The issue appears to be at line 1725 of sbctc.css. Is floating every image
in the main container the desired behavior? If so, you'll have to
explicitly reset for either all within a element or use a
class. You'll need to be more specific with your declaration than what
you've done here:
What Greg said...
/*Show menu when invisible checkbox is checked*/
input[type=checkbox]:checked ~ .menu-main-navigation-container
#menu-main-navigation {
display: block;
}
^ That is in your css files
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:16 PM Greg Gamble wrote:
> Looks like
I might muddy the waters here, but I'll try to explain how I interpreted
the goal. Consider a use-case in which your page has a long list of
anchors (imagine a sticky sidebar which scrolls with the user). The goal
(in my contrived scenario) would be to gray out the anchor which links to
the
Tough one. margin-top: auto as Philippe suggested does work but flex-end,
as I understood it, should take care of this. It's like flex-end doesn't
respect that you've changed the flex-direction to column.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 7:18 PM Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> > On Aug
Note that it still compiles to the first example.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:18 PM Crest Christopher <crestchristop...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I knew probably SaSS could do it although I don't use SaSS atleast I was
> right ;-)
>
> Chris Rockwell wrote:
>
>
> If I understand
If I understand you correctly, no.
You can do:
body {
background-image: url('my300pximage.jpg');
}
@media and (min-width: 700px) {
body {
background-image: url('my700pximage.jpg');
}
}
With sass you can do this:
body {
background-image: url('my300pximage.jpg');
@media and
Set top:0 in .colorbar-link.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:43 AM Tom Livingston wrote:
> List,
>
> I'm trying to add a hover to a block-styled link. I want to transition the
> 'top' position of the element on hover with easing but I can't get it to
> happen with the easing. Where
The Web developer toolbar from Chris Pedrick (sp?) does that and much more.
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016, 12:01 AM Crest Christopher
wrote:
> Anyone aware of a simple tool for Chrome which allows me to draw a
> freestyle rectangle and get the dimensions displayed ?
>
wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 29, 2016, Chris Rockwell <ch...@chrisrockwell.com>
> wrote:
>
> > If this layout were in a narrower viewport than shown, and keeping
> >> the grid as shown, in my mind the graphics in the middle row would
> begin to
> >> scale before
>
> If this layout were in a narrower viewport than shown, and keeping
> the grid as shown, in my mind the graphics in the middle row would begin to
> scale before the rest.
For clarification: are you saying that's how you think it should work *or*
that is the desired effect you're going for?
the relevant media queries with each component.
I've worked with large codebases that have separate files for media
queries, each breakpoint, and I've always found it more difficult to track
down what I need.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:32 PM Chris Rockwell <ch...@chrisrockwell.com>
wrote:
> I
I have used the method from the second article since I started using Sass.
I break components/objects/atoms/whatever into their own file and it makes
more sense, to me, to include the media query with the components.
I make mine "more inline" though:
.selector {
color: red;
@media
There is likely a width set on one of the parents causing the overflow
scrolling. Do you have a link?
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016, 6:09 PM Larry Martell wrote:
> I am trying to align 4 divs horizontally. I know I've successfully
> done this before with either display:
What are the different scenarios in which this would be used? Is the
assumption that you need to move the text so that it fits right on
different images correct? Can you use background-image for this, and then
position the text within the container?
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 5:00 PM John J
Or flex: https://jsfiddle.net/gc1dgrsb.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 3:01 PM Tom Livingston wrote:
> You could try using calc, if the browser support is ok (
> http://caniuse.com/#search=calc).
>
> .centerdiv{width: calc(100% - 68px};/* 68 is width of two outer divs */
>
> On Mon,
.css-discuss.org [mailto:
> css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Chris Rockwell
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 7:29 PM
> To: Karl DeSaulniers; CSS-D
> Subject: Re: [css-d] syntax: attribute selector on linked image
>
> Is this in an iFrame? Have you inspected th
Is this in an iFrame? Have you inspected the element with developer tools
to see what styles are being applied to it? Maybe yours are simply not
specific enough.
Here is an example using your original that shows the margin works just
fine: https://jsfiddle.net/wnzfh6c4/
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at
ive it a go and see what the results are.
Chris Rockwell
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 3:12 PM, John J <cr8...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have my "waffle" menu div hiding until viewport reaches max-width:
> 42.5rem, using display:none; in the desktop CSS, then using display:inline;
> a
Hi Karl,
I loaded the site on a Nexus 5 and the breakpoints seem to work fine. What
really stands out to me is the slow performance:
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/160130_65_54P/. It loaded very slowly.
I would focus on performance first, which does have an effect on seo.
I use chrome Vox
When I read this I assumed J.C. was referring to a navigation bar that is
fixed to the bottom of the screen, and I think D'Arcy provided a solution
(I didn't test it).
I think there are very valid use cases for this design pattern. If the
navigation is accessible from the bottom of the screen it
when I grab the list it applies my style to the lis and not the ul
Is this because you don't have a consistent, reliable way to target the
ul instead of the li's? If that's the case I would try to go up the
theming chain (not sure the CMS) to apply some classes.
Chris Rockwell
On Wed, Aug 26
When you declare margin: 0 auto you're explicitly giving instructions to
not use margin on the top and bottom. If absolute positioning is
acceptable, you can do:
margin:auto;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom:0;
left:0
right:0;
On Jun 3, 2015 7:46 PM, Crest Christopher
There is no link, Crest. Why do you think z-index would be causing a script
not to run?
On Apr 5, 2015 1:21 PM, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have a problem, z-index on this page is blocking the script to work,
currently I've only removed the z-index for the x320 break
if statement to check if the value returned is zero, if it is, get
the value from the parent.*
Chris Rockwell
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com
wrote:
I think if you add a z-index to everything that is position:relative it
will solve the issue (.circle-button
.
Chris Rockwell
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Tom Livingston wrote:
With respect, the code that the validator doesn't like or understand is
necessary and the issue isn't showing up on other pages of the site with
the same stylesheet.
Fair
It appears that the addition of this:
-webkit-transform: translate3d(0,0,0);
fixes the Safari issue.
That fix was mentioned in one of the StackOverflow threads I saw while
looking into this. Odd that adding z-index didn't work as it did on my
end, as well as removing `position:relative`. Oh
This is pretty ugly, but it works on Safari MAC :
http://codepen.io/chrisrockwell/full/MYmdbo/
Chris Rockwell
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, I still can't post a link for this. Hopefully someone
smarter than me can help me based
Is using LESS for CSS off-topic? Have you looked at Stack Overflow?
stackoverflow.com
Chris Rockwell
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:05 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
A bit off-topic; any good current resources for LESS issues anyone can
share?
Thank you!
John
{ background-color: gray; } }
Chris Rockwell
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Try:
@media only screen and (min-width : 320px) {
#menupanel {background-color:red;height:400px;width:320px;border:2px;}
}
@media only screen and (min-width : 600px
, but they just prefer a
different medium to solve the problems. Use whatever tools help you to
solve the problem in the fastest way.
Chris Rockwell
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
A sheet/styles for base styles. No MQ.
What do you mean by MQ
to wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_resolutions
However, if you've ever looked at the stats for a low to medium traffic
site, that list doesn't cover a fraction of them.
Chris Rockwell
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
I
You have flexbox, display:table-cell, display:inline-block, float:left. I
prefer flexbox but most often use one of the display's and avoid float at
almost all costs.
Are you using inline-block and running into this:
http://css-tricks.com/fighting-the-space-between-inline-block-elements/?
On Nov
loaded.
- Drupal makes it point-and-click easy to aggregate and compress your
CSS/JS, I would recommend taking advantage of this
Hope it helps!
Chris
Chris Rockwell
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:49 PM, J.C. Berry jcharlesbe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello all,
Feel free to tell me
and
paste it in to the Disable Rich Text view. Next, enable rich text, save
it, go back and view the source - is anything different from what you
originally put it?
Again, I don't think this is CSS related so if you want to send me more
details off list I would be happy to try and help.
Chris Rockwell
explanation of the properties
flex-grow and flex-shrink?
Have you seen http://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/?
Chris Rockwell
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Darren Brierton darren.brier...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
I've been trying to familiarise myself with the new Flexible Box
When using a Grid FrameWork must you keep all the column classes and
gutters or that is only needed when designing ?
Not at all. If the grid framework is too difficult to modify for your
needs, choose another framework, or start form scratch.
A grid framework, or any framework for that
I can't look at the example now, but there are endless examples available,
try MDN: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/:first-child
On Sep 26, 2014 9:40 AM, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote:
The first child of my example, I linked too.
Philip Taylor wrote:
Hey Matthew,
If you look at the stylesheet in Chrome dev tools you'll see a red dot
after both of the styles in question - deleting it solves the issue. A
search suggests that it's unicode characters inserted by server side code:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/23511935
Chris
Chris Rockwell
On Tue
it belongs.
Chris Rockwell
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Dave Solko d...@pixelalchemy.com wrote:
Is it possible to add a link to the :after?
I'm adding an image via :after, and I want to make it clickable. Is this
possible?
Using WP, and it's not possible to add the image without
://ejohn.org/blog/sub-pixel-problems-in-css/).
Chris
Chris Rockwell
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:38 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
http://www.coffeeonmars.com/170_su/client/portfolio/
At this link, I have 3 thumbnails which display horizontally and are
evenly distributed, and respect
Glad to help!
Chris Rockwell
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:00 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On Sep 18, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com
wrote:
Check out the Computed tab in Chrome Dev tools - it shows that
47.87234%
is equal to 430.844 pixels which, without
Can you elaborate on what you want/expect to happen? Sounds like a
jsfiddle.net example or some code might be necessary to help.
If you don't want it to happen, it *sounds* like a JavaScript/jQuery issue.
If you want it to happen but you're getting the wrong styles, it *could* be
a CSS issue.
Hey Chris - there is no link in your email.
Chris
Chris Rockwell
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, thank you for your help.
If you don't mind visiting this page, followed by clicking on the word
tutorials. There are two issues, first
Rockwell
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry !
[Link
http://www.thecreativesheep.ca/webdesignprojects/largeprojects/CreativeSheep/cs_site.html
]
Chris Rockwell wrote:
Hey Chris - there is no link in your email.
Chris
Chris Rockwell
Many ways to do this, some add to html, some to css. You should be able to
go to any website that has a form to inspect how they do it.
Just wrap each label/input pair in a span/div and use a class of
'form-element--inline' or 'form-element--block'. Make the former display:
inline-block and the
('image.svg'), none;
There's also modernizr if you're already using that.
Chris
Chris Rockwell
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
List,
I was having a discussion in the comments of an article about using
svg as a background-image in CSS, and using a png
They do work the same. You're not giving it a declaration it doesn't
understand ( like rgba(), therefore causing a fallback ), it perfectly
understands url(), it just can't render the resource you're giving it.
Chris Rockwell
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com
Hey Tom, just a heads up that you need to include the 2nd argument in
background-image:, otherwise it won't fallback.
Chris
On Aug 5, 2014 8:45 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
On Aug 5, 2014, at 6:15 PM,
by adding inline styles (as opposed to adding classes and
dealing with the styling in a sheet), but this will hopefully get you
thinking along the right path.
Make sense?
Chris
Chris Rockwell
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Works in latest Chrome and FF for me
of
the necessity for !important :)).
Chris Rockwell
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Debbie Campbell d...@redkitecreative.com
wrote:
I'm not at all opposed to removing the JS, it's kind of an artifact...
--
Debbie
On 8/1/2014 11:26 AM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
Hi Debbie,
If I understand you
You may not need to Debbie, I just wanted to mention it. Why not add the
CSS I included to your stylesheet and se
Chris Rockwell
I'm not at all opposed to removing the JS, it's kind of an artifact...
--
Debbie
On 8/1/2014 11:26 AM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
Hi Debbie,
If I understand you
I failed, once again, to Reply-All
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com
Date: Jul 30, 2014 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Web fonts
To: Stuart King zinlo...@gmail.com
Cc:
Here is the culprit:
.column-content p {
font-family: Whitney A, Whitney B
and there is no
adherence to structure, you'll end up with some messiness down the road (I
feel like I'm preaching to the choir on this point though :D, maybe I've
misunderstood the question).
Hope that helps.
Chris Rockwell
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
List,
I'm
I would add it to the end of the main sheet and import the partial in this
scenario.
Chris Rockwell
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Chris Rockwell
Felix, admittedly I never questioned why setting font-size: 100% was a best
practice, it's just always something I've done. Based on your response I
did some quick research and, it appears, the original reason was to fix
some ie6/7 issues with em scaling.
Additionally, I checked normalize.CSS as
Nevermind, its not in normalize.CSS, I scanned too quickly - sorry!
On Jul 26, 2014 9:40 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com wrote:
Felix, admittedly I never questioned why setting font-size: 100% was a
best practice, it's just always something I've done. Based on your response
I did
If you haven't seen this yet, it's worth the read and play time:
http://alistapart.com/blog/post/ten-css-one-liners-to-replace-native-apps
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org
is equal to (32 * 1.25)px.
Make sense?
If you want to pad it 20px (1.25em of document base font size), you would
need to set padding-left to 0.625em
Hopefully I haven't muddied the waters.
Chris Rockwell
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:22 AM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On Jul 24, 2014, at 8:18
So, I either have to keep track of the math, or…is there another, better
way I should have built that lock-up?
If you want to use em's, you'll need to be aware of parent font sizes.
Personally, I don't put img's in h1's, but I see it in practice all of
the time (and it's acceptable as far as
Right on…the hide me from view method is one I was encouraged to explore;
have not yet done so.
Take a look at
https://github.com/h5bp/html5-boilerplate/blob/master/css/main.css#L110
__
css-discuss
could
use display:table on header and then display:table-cell on both #lock-up
and img.
Playing around with any of those will get you going.
Chris
Chris Rockwell
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:01 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
http://www.coffeeonmars.com/170_su/template/home.html
Thanks all. It looks like I need to set the width above 100%. I'm
generating screenshots from browserstack now.
Chris Rockwell
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Georg ge...@gunlaug.com wrote:
Den 15.07.2014 02:44, skrev Jon Reece:
Maybe a pixel-rounding issue?
Yes, it is. Testing
a transparent separation that,
again, only occurs in Chrome on this home page. I'm also a bit baffled
because it doesn't happen on internal pages despite them using the same
styling, only the positioning is different.
Thanks for taking a look, and for any ideas.
Chris Rockwell
...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:
css-d-boun...@lists.css-
discuss.org] On Behalf Of Chris Rockwell
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:17 PM
To: CSS-Discuss
Subject: [css-d] Chrome issue with 1 pixel spacing between ul
Hey all,
I'm struggling to track down why, in Chrome (I'm in 35.0.1916.153 m
In that case, why not add 'overflow: visible' to
.l-region--navigation nav .menu:hover li ul
That will resolve the issue with the spacing, but the menu functionality is
messed up -- `overflow` is not transitionable (?) so the sub menus appear
before the transition finishes. See this pen
In the sub menus you have :hover applied to both the li and the a -
what colors/background are you expecting?
#header nav ul li ul li:hover {
1. font-weight: bold;
2. color: green;
#header nav li a:hover{
1. background: skyblue;
2. color: black;
Chris Rockwell
On Thu, Jul 10
That example explicitly sets the width of each th and each td. The last
th and td (the td, really) accounts for what the author thinks will
be the width of the scroll bar. I forked your fiddle and added the top 3
declarations: http://jsfiddle.net/cFr38/
Hope it helps.
Chris Rockwell
On Mon
this as well. That combined with
http://htmlemailboilerplate.com/ will give you some pretty solid email
templates.
Chris Rockwell
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:26 PM, J.C. Berry jcharlesbe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I have a question about a simple layout here. The width is 660px as
you can see
IE 11.0.9600.17107 on Window 7 shows a single red box.
Chris Rockwell
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
Can anyone out there tell me what IE 11 does with the following test case?
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/flexbox/flex-basis_column.html
The expected
Sorry - green box.
Chris Rockwell
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com
wrote:
IE 11.0.9600.17107 on Window 7 shows a single red box.
Chris Rockwell
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com
wrote:
Can anyone out there tell me
Hi Tim,
You have width on #imgDiv set to 'auto'. Every element within #imgDiv is
absolutely positioned which effectively removes them from #imgDiv, making
its width 0. If you set it to the width of your images (250px) it will
resolve.
Chris
Chris Rockwell
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:54 PM
-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Chris Rockwell
/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
.
Good luck!
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On 3/17/14 8:14 AM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
I would recommend re-thinking how you execute your layout. Absolute and
relative positioning are completely unnecessary in this case, and you're
only setting yourself
-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css
Try adding this to your head tag:
meta name=viewport content=width=device-width, initial-scale=1
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:28 PM, SSC_perl p...@surfshopcart.com wrote:
On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
Just click on (SCSS) next to CSS and it will show you the compiled code
Looks good to me on Galaxy S3 (Android 4.3) Chrome
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:21 PM, SSC_perl p...@surfshopcart.com wrote:
On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:53 AM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
meta name=viewport content=width=device-width, initial-scale=1
That was it! Thanks, Chris! The table now
-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
Or maybe it's something else, this seems to work fine:
http://jsfiddle.net/2n6an/
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.comwrote:
It's the letter-spacing, just don't know why yet. It appears to only have
an affect when it's being applied to the content
Aargh, this is annoying. I've got it narrowed down to the text shadow.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.comwrote:
Or maybe it's something else, this seems to work fine:
http://jsfiddle.net/2n6an/
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Chris Rockwell
ch
Here is an example without using ::after and content
http://jsfiddle.net/2n6an/1/
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.comwrote:
Aargh, this is annoying. I've got it narrowed down to the text shadow.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Chris Rockwell
ch
/help_support_evolt/
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org
was not downloaded if the first font was available (I
used Arial, and Open-Sans). I think this will hold true for fonts from
services such as Google Fonts since, in the case of Google atleast, it's
just adding the @font-face declaration which in turn has the url().
--
Chris Rockwell
Has JS hacks as well, but it's a nice reference of all the hacks that are
out there: http://browserhacks.com/
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
When you use the IE Scroll bar as you would to scroll a page, the page
doesn't grow ?
Assuming you mean the height of the page, no, it doesn't grow for me. You
have the height of #capsule set in pixels.
Unless you're viewing it in an old version of IE and its lack of support
for elements
scroll any page, that's odd, what am I experiencing ?
Chris Rockwell wrote:
When you use the IE Scroll bar as you would to scroll a page, the page
doesn't grow ?
Assuming you mean the height of the page, no, it doesn't grow for me.
You have the height of #capsule set in pixels.
Unless you're
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry about not using the correct reply :)
I updated the page
herehttp://www.thecreativesheep.ca/webdesignprojects/largeprojects/cs_site.html
.
Chris Rockwell wrote:
Hey Christopher, you're not hitting reply all, so only I'm getting the
responses
-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css
I think you will have more success using Bootstrap's .nav markup, styled
with
.nav-pills and .nav-stacked. The current markup will need some difficult
CSS to
resolve, methinks.
(This just from a cursory look at Bootstrap - you may find something
better.)
The current markup won't need
Questions are:
- In the left sidebar (Choose a Report) I would like the hover to extend
the complete width of the sidebar and midway up/down between the items. I
used display:block but I can't seem to get it fine tuned.
You should apply display:block to the anchor elements (a) to make them
/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo
-- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css
- not to indicate meaning except in the
case of helping other developers understand the markup.
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org
/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css
So my short answer is that using CSS for this is not a good idea :)
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.comwrote:
I've been thinking about this off and on for a few weeks now. In my case,
I have one image carousel that loads up 18 images. I hid it on narrow
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo