On 9/22/10 6:54 PM, Angela French wrote:
Hello,
I'm got a problem with pages in my site that have a floating sidebox. They LOOK fine, but
they are not accessible in terms of a semantic document outline. The problem is that the
headings I have given my sidebar box aren't correct in terms
On 9/20/10 5:31 AM, Michal Čizmazia wrote:
Hi, which browsers render my test case correctly?
http://cim.szm.com/stretch-over-cell.html
Thank you.
Michal Cizmazia
On Mac OS X 10.4.11
Pass
Opera/10.62
Fail
Camino/2.0.3
Safari/4.1.2
WebKit nightly trunk 63031 [crashes browser]
On 9/20/10 6:46 AM, Michal Čizmazia wrote:
Wow, thank you David,
is the specification clear in this case? Is there a way how can I
stretch the nested span over a table cell in all browsers?
The test case:
- http://jsfiddle.net/Vwg7T/
- http://cim.szm.com/stretch-over-cell.html
Michal
So how does David's query work?
I am not so sure David's query does work. Drag the window to
approximately 475px and judge for yourself -- assuming, of course, we
are talking about the same thing and we both speak both speak Spanish...
What say we consult the various clerks of the
On 9/17/10 11:54 PM, Allen Bennett wrote:
Most lines center only in AM browser (a tabbed browser that sits on top of
IE-so I assume that it works properly in IE, also). Also, it gives a
malware warning when I try to open it in Google Chrome (only). The CSS is
below.
Allen J. Bennett
On 9/18/10 10:45 AM, Rob Emenecker wrote:
Checked on a local file only...
*:first-child + html .left,
*:first-child + html .right,
*:first-child + html .maincontent {
z-index: -1; background: lime; }
/* for IE/7.0 */
That did work, however when I tried applying the same treatment to the DIV
On 9/18/10 12:45 PM, David Laakso wrote:
On 9/18/10 11:30 AM, Allen Bennett wrote:
It gives me an error because I didn't send it a fill--but I don't
know how
to; evidently I can't simply click on the URL you sent me.
Most lines center only in AM browser (a tabbed browser that sits on
top
On 9/18/10 7:56 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
We could use this:
.left,.right,.maincontent,x:-ie7 {}
Actually, it is the colon that dos the magic.
For example:
selector,ie:7 {...}
or:
selector,:7 {...} /* even shorter to target ie7 :) */
--
Regards,
Thierry
Please see sig link IE
On 9/17/10 7:52 AM, sisir behera wrote:
Hi,
you can see the following url to use the jquery plugin.
http://www.filamentgroup.com/lab/setting_equal_heights_with_jquery/
Please let me give suggestion on this.
Thanks,
Sisir
Since this list devoted to the practical application of CSS,
On 9/17/10 2:44 PM, Rob Emenecker wrote:
Okay, more important than my last query...
Can anyone shed any light as to why the z-index is not behaving as
desired/expected on IE7? The suckerfish menu is falling behind my content.
(Or my content is appearing on top.) Either case, it's not
On 9/15/10 8:24 PM, Keith Purtell wrote:
A typical example of a problem I'm trying to deal with is IE ignoring
max-width.- Keith Purtell
IE 7/8 support min/max.
IE/6 does not support min/max.
IE/6 is on death row.
Feed IE/6 width only [not min/max width].
#page {min-width: whatever;
On 9/14/10 7:55 PM, Chris Blake wrote:
Be warned this CMS template creates a whole load or wrappers so you'll
have to expand about 100 divs before getting to the culprits. It is
however one sexy menu that works even with javascript turned off.
Drink a warm cup of milk, maybe with some
On 9/11/10 11:16 AM, Yogesh Agashe wrote:
Hello,
I am developing a website where we deal with lot of thumbnail images which
are almost always scaled down or up.
I use ubuntu 10.04 and have observed that images which are scaled down look
very poor in Firefox, which is not the case with Google
On 9/9/10 8:42 AM, Claude Needham wrote:
I have developed a practice of using 100% in the body and then using
em elsewhere to set sizes.
Such as:
body {
font-size: 100%; /* base my size on user default */
font-weight: normal;
font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;
}
h1 {
On 9/9/10 9:09 PM, Keith Purtell wrote:
I've been working on making my css flexible with different
browsers/screen resolutions/devices. The best information I've found so
far has been the Patrick Griffiths article at A List Apart. In applying
the suggestion that I use ems as often as possible,
On 9/6/10 8:44 AM, Alan Gresley wrote:
Best viewed in Webkit (Safari 5). Enjoy.
http://css-class.com/test/css/shadows/box-shadow-spheres2.htm
Nice job.
Best,
~d
PS In the world of geometry is that a sphere or is it known as a simple
circular object?
--
:: desktop and mobile ::
On 9/6/10 11:12 AM, Alan Gresley wrote:
It is our perception that makes it appear spherical.
It appears to be what it is: a dimple :-) , rather than a sphere.
Best,
Gertrude Stein
--
:: desktop and mobile ::
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
On 9/6/10 1:30 PM, Alan Gresley wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
On 9/6/10 11:12 AM, Alan Gresley wrote:
It is our perception that makes it appear spherical.
It appears to be what it is: a dimple :-) , rather than a sphere.
Best,
Gertrude Stein
That are really two way of perceiving
On 9/4/10 1:20 PM, Brian M. Curran wrote:
So it seems that the language keeps getting revised/improved,
but it has continued to just be known as CSS, correct?
Sincerely,
Brian M. Curran
Yes, I think that is a fair assumption. In and of itself, CSS is often
used in the generic
On 9/3/10 5:58 AM, Rick Gordon wrote:
What is the best way to set an image with liquid sizing so that it will fit,
for example, into the left 25% of its containing div?
Do you mean something like this?
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/11.html
Drag to 640...
Best,
Diane Arbus
--
::
On 9/2/10 1:48 AM, taestrada wrote:
This is the url: http://www.pastrycraftseattle.com
Thank you so much. It worked!
Alix
O.K. so far. But we're not quite finished.
1/ In the sidebar in IE 6/7 the top of the colored-block that reads
Sign up for a class kisses the bottom of the
On 9/2/10 9:46 AM, Kim Brooks Wei wrote:
Hi All,
If my layout is liquid - that means to me that it resizes to fit any
browser window - why is it that I can see only part of it (and no
scroll bar to see the rest) at lower resolutions?
Pondering the mystery in metro New York
Kimi
I
On 9/2/10 11:31 AM, Kim Brooks Wei wrote:
Hey David,
Thank you! I shot you an email thanking you for this layout a couple
of days ago. It's probably sitting in your trash folder where a lot of
my emails end up being filtered : (.
Yes, I know... I saw your mail and I read it. I sent you
On 9/2/10 8:23 PM, Kim Brooks Wei wrote:
I have nth child even-odd styling on this page set up as an ID. When I
changed this to class so I could set up a second styled section
farther down the page the styling broke. Any ideas as to why?
http://bit.ly/ad7AEl
I am not quite sure what you
On 9/3/10 1:04 AM, Kim Brooks Wei wrote:
At 9:31 PM -0400 9/2/10, David Laakso wrote:
On 9/2/10 8:23 PM, Kim Brooks Wei wrote:
I have nth child even-odd styling on this page set up as an ID. When
I changed this to class so I could set up a second styled section
farther down the page
taestrada wrote:
I am having the strangest problem with a site I built. It looks great when I
view it in Firefox, Chrome and IE8, but two people have reported that the
the brown navigation bar doesn't show up at all. One of them was using IE7
and the other said IE8. Since I can't replicate the
Keith Purtell wrote:
David:
It's taken me a while to write you because I've been digesting and
applying all the advice I got about my newbie CSS efforts.
Hi, Studs Terkel, Chicago, on this end with some suggestions that have
nothing to do with what you wrote David Hucklesby about--
On 9/1/10 9:43 PM, Cheryl Smith wrote:
What is the email address to access webdesign-l?
Cheryl
web design list l...@webdesign-l.com
Do you have a CSS question, Cheryl?
Btw, thanks! I did not know that that was meatloaf...
Best,
~d
--
:: desktop and mobile ::
Kim Brooks Wei wrote:
Hi David and all,
I had some time to look into this after replacing my failing Mac.
Yikes!
It seems that basically my copy is sliding underneath the tiger when
window size is reduced - is that the problem you were referring to?
Yes, sort of... :-)
What can
Blake, that's a fantastic article you sent me - thanks for it. While I
pick it apart I still need my site to be functional and it isn't,
entirely. So, can you help me figure a way to get the beige background
and its contents to either 1) slide to the left right on top of the
tiger when
Rick Pasotto wrote:
Does IE8 work differently on different versions of Windows?
My site ( http://d37tm.org ) doubles the height of the header -- at
least on IE8 on XP. I see it in browsershots.com (I think you can see
the results at http://browsershots.org/http://d37tm.org/ )
The css is:
Tom Livingston wrote:
I have the following in my stylesheet:
How can I fix this?
Please provide a url. Thanks. ~d
--
:: desktop and mobile ::
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
__
css-discuss
Timariane Thornewig wrote:
I just tried to adjust the CSS and I created another version of the HTML called:
http://www.ashelighting.com/controldesign2.html
It's not really solving my problem, but I think I'm getting closer!
Unable to hit a moving target :-) . Let it be and make no
Brian M. Curran wrote:
I was tinkering with my
site this morning, and caused a float drop problem in IE6. What happened
was. I was trying to create some white space between my secondary nav and
the side of my page. My site is: drafting services . com (remove all
spaces).
Sincerely,
Brian
Brian M. Curran wrote:
Thank you David!! I normally don't think bug when something is going wrong
in my desired results.
-Brian
I think what Alan suggested will work as well and avoids writing a hack.
But then if you prefer to retaliate then what Georg Sortun wrote below
gives you
Martin wrote:
Hi there,
I've been googling for it and a:active doesn't work as I'd like it to.
I've got a menu. When I hover over a menu item the colour changes to
orange. I'd like it
to stay orange as long as I'm on this particular page for visitors to
know where they are at the moment.
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Thank you David!! I normally don't think bug when something is
going wrong
in my desired results.
I think what Alan suggested will work as well and avoids writing a
hack.
Actually I think there is no need for the selector hack.
One can safely
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't understand your approach.
What's your reasoning for using the selector hack?
--
Regards,
Thierry
To remember, not to forget, that display:inline; it is only needed by
a browser that is on death row. If that bothers you, delete the
Adam wrote:
I notice when trying to style a drop cap, everything looks fine, but some characters are
cut off near the bottom, such as the letter Q.
I have tried adding width settings which I notice some people do, as well as adjust the line-height.
Here is an example where it happens:
Claude Needham wrote:
But, before filing this away under the heading of unique oddities to
avoid in the future
I wanted to check with others to see if there was a deeper
understanding to be gleaned or
a best practices type of lesson to be learned.
Regards,
Claude Needham
I suppose you
Keith Purtell wrote:
Hope this is what you wanted...
http://www.keithpurtell.com/kthings/a_body_vance_divs.htm
- Keith Purtell
http://www.myspace.com/canyonsofthesky
What is your uri?
Best,
~d
Keith,
I am not sure what the question is but anyway some observations:
Wesley Acheson wrote:
Forgot the link http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?page=3cid=27F87
btw the search I'm doing is list columns css
What does everyone think does this work in the wild?
Regards,
Wesley
Yes, it will work just fine-- assuming of course that you
Keith Purtell wrote:
I will correct these errors asap. Thank you for taking time to critique
my efforts. Css-d is an outstanding community resource.
- Keith Purtell
http://www.myspace.com/canyonsofthesky
Coping with the World Wide Web is sometimes difficult. Hang around. Much
fun
This page [signature link] on a drag from a full desktop window to a
480px window opens fine in Opera without a horizontal scroll bar. Same
at 240px in Opera.
However in FF and Safari it's fine at 480px, but refuses to open at all
at 240px. Why be that?
css :: around line 168
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Aug 25, 2010, at 11:09 PM, David Laakso wrote:
However in FF and Safari it's fine at 480px, but refuses to open at all at
240px. Why be that?
What do you mean 'refuses to open'.
when I resize a window with a Gecko browser to something smaller than 240px
Scott Povlot wrote:
I need some help with a rendering problem on IE8 that does not show on other
browsers including IE7, Firefox and Chrome. I am using an image replacement
technique for the title header. On IE8, there is a large gap at top of the
image so the backgrounds don't match up.
Keith Purtell wrote:
Time, and considering keeping the existing brown area, putting brief
text in the nav buttons. Then they'd see the full page title when they
got there.
So many options.
Thanks again for helping.
- Keith Purtell
So many options. So little time. What is your uri?
Bill Braun wrote:
I am adapting a Word Press style to integrate a blog into my web site.
I have just about everything except the top navigation font style.
This is the reference style:
http://basicbusinesssim.com/
This is the blog page I am trying to match:
Alan Gresley wrote:
The other is of a drop menu. A browser that does not support
transition would use the normal method of hiding sub-menus with ap.
and a browser that supports transitions would use height: 0 and
height: auto on hover (Just like in your demo).
Wesley Acheson wrote:
Hi All,
Are we still limited to 7 or so web safe fonts?
I'm a little bored of some of these. What are good fonts supported by
the majority of browsers on the majority of operating systems?
Wes
No, I don't think so, although as for myself I am limited by my
Francesco wrote:
Looking for feedback on a design I'm almost done with.
http://blackcoil.com/classychild
--
Francesco Sanfilippo, Blackcoil Productions
Not exactly my kind of thing, but nevertheless I did not see any
particular problem with it, Francesco. O.K. in Mac OS X 10.4. Mac
Climis, Tim wrote:
In a comment on Gabrielle's blog posting a couple weeks ago about whether or
not animation belongs in CSS, I came up with a use case for CSS dropdown
menus. Basically, my idea was that you might want to make your menu drop
down with a wipe.
---Tim
Promising,
Climis, Tim wrote:
Promising, I think...
Near the bottom of the page he has a fairly recent example of a CSS3
transition slide-down...
http://www.gethifi.com/blog/nicer-navigation-with-css-transitions
That's pretty much the effect I'm going for (sans the opacity transition). But
a
Charles Turner wrote:
I've got a simple page that is supposed to render a font on the iPad at the
same size in both portrait and landscape modes. It contains the following
markup:
meta name=viewport content=user-scalable=no, width=device-width/
and in a media query for the (portrait) display
Keith Purtell wrote:
I took every message I got about this Web page and pasted it into a
24-page MS Word document.
http://www.keithpurtell.com/kthings/a_body_vance_divs.htm
- Keith Purtell
Start over with a clear head and a clean sheet. Hit the verticals. Hold
the horizontals.
Nestor Augusto Tous Maya wrote:
Good day,
I'm working at the Universidad Tecnologica de Pereira in Colombia as web
developer.
I have a question on the subject of progressive improvement. Happens that on
the website www.utp.edu.co we had the CSS validation icon, but to access it
7
Daniel Hammond wrote:
URL: http://www.northsidecreativeservices.org/sportsandrec
In IE7, the horizontal navigation is shifted down one pixel, so the bottom of
the buttons covers up the black horizontal line that is the bottom border for
the horizontal navigation area. All other browsers
is adding /vertical/ space between the blocks when there is a text-image
in the .outer column.
Browser bug or human bug? Is there a simple fix [other than to ap the
text-image]
markup
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/ron1.htm
css
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 7:19 AM, David Laakso wrote:
is adding /vertical/ space between the blocks when there is a text-image
in the .outer column.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/ron1.htm
It is a Gecko bug (affects anything that uses Gecko 1.9.0
Keith Purtell wrote:
Wow. I got a mountain of suggestions that I did not expect; all valuable.
- Keith Purtell
Keep it simple. All will be well [ sort of ].
Best,
Simon [1]
PS I must remember /not to forget/ to keep it simple myself :-) .
[1]
Ron Zisman wrote:
hey,
page:
http://www.ricochet.org/dn_test/micro_1.html
css:
http://www.ricochet.org/dn_test/stylesheets
ron
Validate the markup and css and bring it back...
~d
--
:: desktop and mobile ::
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Validate the markup and css and bring it back...
thanks david
valid page
http://www.ricochet.org/dn_test/micro_1.html
Close but no cigar :-) .
in the 3rd and 4th units from the top. i'm trying to get .right to
make 2 cols...see png
png:
Steven DuBois wrote:
On 08/14/2010 05:04 AM, Dipesh Parmar wrote:
Does anyone have any experience in a good CMS platform...
Dipesh
I really like Wolf CMS.
That's nice.
Do you have a CSS question?
~d
--
:: desktop and mobile ::
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Averill Ring at Irisweb wrote:
Fwiw, it is usually best to use a strict doctype for a new site.
Why?
Averill
Because HTML 4.01 Strict [and XHTML 1.0 Strict] emphasize structure over
presentation and they are /forward/ compatible.
Best,
~d
--
:: desktop and mobile ::
Kim Brooks Wei wrote:
Thanks, people, for checking this. It seems to look OK on Mac. I'm
concerned with Windows and Linux browsers now.
David, thanks for taking a look. I didn't know precisely what you
wanted me to check but I did see some rendering problems with my
static image and
Karey Cummins wrote:
IE9 is rumored to arrive in 2011.
Karey Cummins
Things change. Modify your behavior accordingly. All will be well.
Best,
~d
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
__
css-discuss
Averill Ring at Irisweb wrote:
I could use some suggestions with this site
http://irisweb.net/emily
Three things:
1) In validating the pages, I keep getting this same error message:
previous problem http://www.totalvalidator.com/validator/Validator#p0E649
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
At the start-up where I work, we've been trying to find and hire a UI
designer but it's proving to be rather challenging.
Cheers,
Hilco
This list deals primarily with specific CSS questions.
You might post your question to:
web design list l...@webdesign-l.com
Averill Ring at Irisweb wrote:
I could use some suggestions with this site
http://irisweb.net/emily
There's always a difference between the font rendering from IE8 to FF, IE
always looking larger and bolder. Is there a fix for this?
Averill Ring
Is IE at default?
IE/8
Averill Ring at Irisweb wrote:
I could use some suggestions with this site
http://irisweb.net/emily
I've tried to get the bottom of the right column to line up vertically with
the bottom of the left column. If I make a height declaration for
#contentright it drops it down and renders it
Keith Purtell wrote:
I'd like to be able to post the
link here and get comments/troubleshooting. Hope that's OK.
- Keith Purtell
CSS related questions are almost always welcome here as far as I know.
So, post your question [s]. And, welcome to the list... if you have not
been here
Averill Ring wrote:
David, you ... trimmed
Averill
I could use some suggestions with this site
http://irisweb.net/emily
Averill Ring
Averill,
O.K. I hope it works out for you.
It is a good to reply to the list as others may wish to express their
opinion.
Best,
~d
PS
Alan Gresley wrote:
Initially being an exploration into mathematics and sacred geometry,
what I have discovered (like many others) is that hexadecimal colors
can be represented as a 3D prism. I now present it to this list since
it's also a very good color selector.
Dear Theo,
It
Chris Akins wrote:
Our organization is wanting to start down the road of making some of our
applications and content more mobile device friendly.
Chris Akins
Thi/m/k media queries.
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/
--
Tom Livingston wrote:
Just another thought:
www.cloudfour.com/css-media-query-for-mobile-is-fools-gold/
Do you have anymore happiness and good cheer that you might want to
bring to the table?
~d
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Aug 9, 2010, at 12:46 PM, David Laakso wrote:
uri: signature link
On a drag from a full window [1680px this end] to 400px window all is
well [sort of].
Drag back from a 400px window to a full window and both Safari and the
current WebKit nightly
Kim Brooks Wei wrote:
Hi People,
Can you see a double image of my tiger graphic?
No.
Is the page you see
stretched out horizontally -
Yes.
does the type look extended (it
No. Btw, I suggested you check your page in IE 6/7 the last time you
wrote [months ago].
Gabriele Romanato wrote:
Hi!
need some responses and criticisms about my opinions expressed right
here:
http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/08/css3-animations-considered-harmful.html
HTH ^^/
Gabriele Romanato
CSS is a programming language: albeit, a very simple one. It copes with
Michael Beaudoin wrote:
On Aug 6, 2010, at 7:34 PM, David Laakso wrote:
Michael Beaudoin wrote:
I can't get the submenus to line up under the nav menu item. Right
now they are down and to the right.
http://www.ba-doyn.com/junk/ for your perusal.
Michael
No guarantee. Try
sfeld...@sympatico.ca wrote:
hey all,
Is there a good way to get a drop shadow on text using css? I've got
something that seems to work in Safari, and in FireFox 3.6.8 on a mac, but I
think that's about it.
Others have answered your quesion.
I can't really fake this with an image or
Sandy wrote:
the site
needs to work for people who will be increasing text size and also
for those who will be using a screen reader.
Then set no font less than default, and ditch the Verdana and MS
stuff: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif will do.
Letter-spacing content text is not helping
uri: signature link
On a drag from a full window [1680px this end] to 400px window all is
well [sort of].
Drag back from a 400px window to a full window and both Safari and the
current WebKit nightly [and perhaps other browsers] require a reload to
un-stack the bottom navigation.
Mac Firefox
Ido dekkers wrote:
I'm building a 2 column layout design, on the left will be the navigation
and on the right the content.
the 2 questions are:
I don't exactly know what exactly you should do other than spending a
little time looking around here there and everywhere to see what others
David Hucklesby wrote:
Is there a way to zoom pages in IETester?
Cordially,
David
--
Yes. There is a + - slider.
Best,
~d
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
Michael Beaudoin wrote:
I am working on some css/javascript drop down menus and for the life
of me I can't get the submenus to line up under the nav menu item.
Right now they are down and to the right.
The offending file is at http://www.ba-doyn.com/junk/ for your perusal.
Thanks so
markup
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/site/portfolio/01.php
css
around line 669
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/site/css/sisu.css
The image does not fill the width of the window in
Sanyo Mirro scp3810 for BoostMobile running Opera Mini 5.1
nor in the Opera Mini Simulator.
David Laakso wrote:
markup
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/site/portfolio/01.php
Best,
~d
Resolved on the Opera Mini Simulator and Sanyo Mirro handset.
Settings: changed from low to: Image Quality High [ thanks to Duncan
Hill -- on another list ].
This brings the image up to a full
Duncan Hill wrote:
This is probably running off-topic now for CSS-D as it is looking more
like an Opera bug.
Opera 10.70 (Linux Mint 9) shows the same effect
http://redlemonarts.com/_dev/textbeast/faq.html
Duncan
Sue Linux/Opera.
Personal Opinion: the page proper looks far
Duncan Hill wrote:
(bonus for whoever tells me why the four panels are rendered differently
between surprising browsers, Firefox and IE7/8 versus all the rest!
Duncan
/Anything/ to relieve the boredom of all this. But, what four panels do
you mean?
Best,
~d
--
desktop
Duncan Hill wrote:
/Anything/ to relieve the boredom of all this. But, what four panels
do you mean?
Best,
~d
Hi David,
I am seeing size issues on the four panels on the two pages
http://redlemonarts.com/_dev/textbeast/home2.html (menu: Buy Now)
David Laakso wrote:
Duncan Hill wrote:
/Anything/ to relieve the boredom of all this. But, what four panels
do you mean?
Best,
~d
Hi David,
I am seeing size issues on the four panels on the two pages
http://redlemonarts.com/_dev/textbeast/home2.html (menu: Buy Now)
http
Error correction:
This
div class=pane one
should read...
div class=pane
~d
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
Duncan Hill wrote:
Opera box-shadow problem:
related page:
http://redlemonarts.com/_dev/textbeast/faq.html
I only have Opera 10.60 on my systems (Win XP and Linux Mint 9) so I don't
know if this relates to earlier versions as well.
Duncan
I do not see any particular problem
Duncan Hill wrote:
aside
I tested up to 24px just to prevent boredom for you.
Fixed now :D (I hope)
Best wishes
Duncan
Thanks. We're looking good :-) . Way to go, Duncan.
Best,
Helen Keller
Tuscumbia, Alabama
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Shortie Designs wrote:
I'm trying to keep the current page navigation link a different colour to
the rest of the navigation link - this way users will know what page they
are on.
Sofia
This is one way to do it.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/8.html
Best,
~d
--
Elizabeth Farley wrote:
How can I tweak this website so that the bottom part of the site would be
better visible on a widescreen laptop?
http://elizabethfarley.web.officelive.com/StoneTheater/index.html
Thanks so much,
I suppose that depends on what you mean by better visible.
Elizabeth Farley wrote:
Elizabeth Farley wrote:
How can I tweak this website so that the bottom part of the site would be
better visible on a widescreen laptop?
http://elizabethfarley.web.officelive.com/StoneTheater/index.html
Thanks so much,
I suppose that
Brian M. Curran wrote:
Could someone tell me why there is a gap between my #header and #subheader
on this test page:
Brian
Someone, or another, punished you for setting mousetype :-) ?
#subheader { overflow: hidden; }
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Angela French wrote:
I'm being driving nuts by absolute positioning rendering between IE and FF.
I just want to confirm what I think is correct about absolute positioning.
My understanding is that an absolutely position element positions itself
relative to its parent container. If the
Peter Lawson wrote:
I doubt you get questions more basic than this :-[
It is basic questions that make the world tick.
Fwiw, a stab at your very good question
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/8.html
Best,
~d
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
701 - 800 of 3463 matches
Mail list logo
