John wrote:
I have this for my basic links:
a {
color: #111311;
border-bottom: 1px dotted #000;
margin: 0 0 0 0;
padding-bottom: 1px;
text-decoration: none;
}
a:hover, a:focus, a:active {
color: #8c;
}
and I want to keep it, but I also
PL wrote:
My client has a number of property pages. I have just added flash slide shows
to the banner area. I did not change anything in the CSS to do this and the CSS
remains the same for all property pages as before.
However, on one page, the text appears to have changed to a smaller font
I am looking for a technique that will allow me
to generate a DIV, the width of which is the
width of its widest non-shrinkable immediate child
element; the DIV will always be floated.
For example, consider the following :
DIV style=float: ...
IMG src=... alt=...
Karl Bedingfield wrote:
Now it may be that I have spent too many hours at the laptop but for
some reason my new Tumblr theme design just does not show in IE. All I
get is the background and no content. My site displays just fine in
Chrome and Firefox.
Can anyone see what might be causing
Karl Bedingfield wrote:
Well I cleaned up the validation a little. As far as I can see the
other code is auto-generated and beyond my control.
I still think there is a CSS issue I am missing. Just don't know what.
Well, that's quite possible :
W3C CSS Validator results for
Could some kind soul suggest to which list questions
concerning event handling are best directed (in the
context of web pages, image maps, and onmouseover/out) ?
Many thanks in advance :
Philip Taylor
__
css-discuss
Felix Miata wrote:
Linux distros are free to package extensions or not as they see fit.
Apparently David's doesn't and yours does, or David's using neither Linux nor an
extension that provides it.
Is there any evidence to suggest that Reply to list
functionality is offered only via an
URL or URI ?
Angela French wrote:
I have a background image that repeats vertically. The weird thing is though,
that it is rendering with a small space between each one. Can someone tell me
what property I might try to get rid of that? Or why it is doing that?
Angela French
Internet
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Have you tested this in anything beside a Gecko browser ?
To be honest, no. I develop using solely Seamonkey, and
only when the site renders successfully in that do I look
to see how it might render in other browsers.
See
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
Since you already have markup like
Mspan class=Keyphraseany of us/span
it would seem natural to put the initial letter in a classed span, making it
trivial to refer to it in CSS. Assuming, of course, that you can affect the
markup.
Yes, I can indeed; I was just
Could anyone explain why the leading M of the following paragraph :
p style=margin-top: 2.3em!-- #BeginLibraryItem /Library/Ugandan infant in a laundry basket.lbi --img id=Infant-Uganda-001
src=Resources/Images/Photographs/Web/Scaled/240/Infant-Uganda.001.jpg
Elli Vizcaino wrote:
Hello,
I am unable to test functional behavior cross browser because I have to rely
on browser shot services to do my testing. I would greatly appreciate it, if
a number of you would take a look at this site http://e7flux.com/dfd/ and
hover on the word About in
Elli Vizcaino wrote:
Seamonkey? Umm that doesn't sound like a very popular browser. What
machine/OS do you have?
Pentium 4-based PC running Windows/XP Professional; SP3.
Philip Taylor
__
css-discuss
Elli Vizcaino wrote:
No one is giving me any insights into this sub menu hanging issue I got
feedback on. Or has it magically corrected itself after I made the other
adjustments. Another look would be greatly appreciated :)
No comments on this, since I can't see it, but there is one
Tom Livingston wrote:
Link?
Nancy Timper wrote:
DUH.
http://www.datecreekranch.com
thanks
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
Tomasz Borek wrote:
What actually puzzles me is why would that site creator have different
classes (char1, char2, ...) for characters in each letter in Cowpoke's.
Including the '.
The only styling he uses is margin-right, like:
h1 .char2 { /* try also char5 and char8 */
mem wrote:
Let's suppose that by looking to those wireframes, I can say that all my h2
will have a padding-bottom of 10px.
However, if later on, I create a rule telling that the ul will have a margin
top of 5px... (because almost all may have that attribute) if I place the h2
on top of
bruce.som...@web.de wrote:
My current employer - and the previous employer - use IE6 as their
official corporate browser. The reason the current employer uses it?
High end mission critical enterprise web apps that work only with IE6.
Replacing the apps would cost millions of dollars or more,
Scott Hamm wrote:
I've been looking all over websites -- a lot of good h1 replacement
suggestions. But which one is more practical, validated in all aspects i.e.
bobby approved, html5, etc?
H1 is HTML, not CSS, but that said, why might anyone want to replace it ?
Philip Taylor
David Laakso wrote:
For those among us who suffer from short-term-memory-loss and/or don't have
time to look it up:
--what is your url?
--what versions of IE do you need to hit?
I can confirm that http://adif.sk/testversion/index.html, viewed
in Internet Explorer V7 on Windows/XP, looks
Chetan Crasta wrote:
Using Firebug, this is what I found:
The two lines is actually a bottom border on the h1. The p element is
relatively positioned to overlap the bottom part of the h1. A background
color is set on the p to prevent the border from being seen over the
letters.
Clever !
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
18.8.2011 8:40, Rick Gordon wrote:
I'm just wondering how I might approach addressing a tag that appears just
before another tag, lick the p tag that would immediately precede an h1.
The adjacent sibling selector p h1 would give me access to the attributes
of
Keith Purtell wrote:
I've removed most of the ugly blankness of my splash page, but two
technical problems remain.
...
http://www.keithpurtell.com/kthings/
Keith, do you have any idea why the T is so badly
(over)kerned in CONTACT ? It is very tight in
OTHER and AUTHORS, but just gets away
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline)
is intended to convey I have no idea -- it did not
come from this end.
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Keith Purtell wrote:
I've removed most of the ugly blankness of my splash page, but two
technical problems remain
Tom Livingston wrote:
Though I'm rusty on *HTML hacks- havent used one in years -
the validator is a tool, not law. If you know that is correct
and need it for a fix, then it's fine.
With respect, the validator is more likely to know if something
is correct than a mere human; I would be
FWIW, I think that Ghodmode has every right to ask
why HTML e-mails are prohibited on this list, even
though I personally rejoice that they are. I also
appreciate the non-confrontational way in which he
has presented his views and responded to the view of
others. However. In my e-mail client
Brian M. Curran wrote:
Why does www.seobook.com put his logo in a div? It seems like its' only
purpose is to hold the code class=logo. Wouldn't it have been easier to
put the class=logo in the img tag like how I did on my site:
www.draftingservices.com ?
Well, clearly I don't /know/ why
Felix Miata wrote:
I don't remember being able to notice any differences between Lucida
Grande and Lucida Sans Unicode on any machine I had both installed on,
though I've not checked in a while. OTOH, you probably won't find
Grande on any system that doesn't have Safari installed unless
Barney Carroll wrote:
Keith,
By default. block-level elements occupy the full available width, thus any
following block-level elements can only appear directly below.
I am unconvinced of this explanation. At
http://web-consultants.org.uk/sites/tests/Block-level-elements/DIVs.html
Alan Gresley wrote:
It is really do with block flow direction.
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-writing-modes/#text-flow
| The block flow direction is the direction in which
| block-level boxes stack and the direction in which
| line boxes stack within a block container. The
|
karla porter wrote:
correct me if I'm wrong - but Google web fonts don't require the
@font-face code. I've never had to insert that. Only the following
code needs to be placed at the beginning of the/headelement...
link href='http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=WHATEVER FONT YOU
USE'
Barney Carroll wrote:
The Readable Web blog is almost my single point of reference for the
latest on font-face.
If it's supposed to be The Readable Web, why does it eschew both
accepted conventions [1] for indicating the start of a new paragraph,
and rely solely on the last line of the
Discussion taken off-list.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On May 6, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
My mouse was over the lower central image, which
resolutely refused to come to the foreground until
I moved my mouse away from all three images. When
I move from the rightmost to the central
Does not work for me, Gabriele : Seamonkey 2.0.14,
Win/XP;SP3.
https://picasaweb.google.com/Chaa006/ScreenCaptures?authkey=Gv1sRgCPLV3Kvwm6zA5QE#5603311437556736210
My mouse was over the lower central image, which
resolutely refused to come to the foreground until
I moved my mouse away
John D wrote:
You will only succeed in wasting your time because it is not useful anymore.
Delphi will be more useful if you want to learn something new.
Responded to off-list.
Philip Taylor
__
css-discuss
Lesley Lutomski wrote:
You've missed the semi-colon after width:
800px - I don't know if that might be causing problems in whichever
browser you're using.
It's not missing, it is omitted; as in Algol-68, semi-colon
is a separator in CSS, not a terminator.
Philip Taylor
Ingo Chao wrote:
Some hate the effect [1], therefore, it is decoration.
Some hate coz, gonna and 'fess up, but they are
still (sadly) only too often a part of the content :-(
Philip Taylor
__
css-discuss
David Laakso wrote:
Long-shot: write and upload an .htaccess file
Isn't .htaccess Apache-specific ? From the original
message :
On 4/13/11 7:20 PM, Richard Wendrock Forum wrote:
http://www.PineMillRanch.com/Index.asp
I would expect the use of IIS.
Philip Taylor
Andrew C. Johnston wrote:
Thanks Philip once again, pulling out thebase href=[(site_name)]/base
solved the problem, in combination with your earlier advice about the comment
code.
Really appreciate your assistance, I could never have figured it out by myself.
You're very welcome, Andrew.
Andrew C. Johnston wrote:
When the site was converted, I hacked out one piece of code, which served to
allow the header image to effectively span the entire width of the browser,
improving the look tremendously in my view, but causing errors in ie:
!--
body {
margin-top: 0px;
Andrew C. Johnston wrote:
New link here: http://www.rayxi.com/index.php?id=197
But, it still seems to have the same problem is ie.
Are these, in combination, not likely to be the source of the problem ?
base href=Rayxi Consulting/base
link href=assets/templates/andrew/css/cncss.css
What has happened to some of the text on the
yellow Post-it (R), Gabriele ?
http://web-consultants.org.uk/sites/tests/css/Fullscreen capture
07-Apr-2011 183056.jpg
Philip Taylor
Gabriele Romanato wrote:
I've often asked myself: 'ok, we can rotate boxes with CSS3, but what
John D wrote:
Have you seen this article before:
http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/centered-dropdown-menus
Let us know if this is what you were looking for.
The drop-down for the fourth element is very strangely positioned :
Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
Beware of trying to fit text into a fixed-size container:
http://t.cfaj.ca/postit.jpg
For an example that works with any font size, see
http://twd2.cfaj.ca/. (I have just started to redo my site, so
there not much there besides the first page.)
I don't know how
Alan Gresley wrote:
With this statement, the inability of browser vendors to comply with
W3C specifications. I can assure that the total reverse is true.
The greatest change regarding CSS is the extensive work in re-writing
various parts of the CSS2.1 specs to match current browser
Alan Gresley wrote:
The answer is no. Isn't the css2.1 spec clear enough ?
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#characters
This is not correct. You can begin ID and class selectors with numbers.
The only thing is that they must be encoded properly with characters
escapes (the above spec
Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
It will take me some time to decide by looking at the formal
parts of the specification whether Alan is correct in his assertion;
perhaps others more familiar with the formal syntax can save
time by answering and/or pointing us at the rule(s
Markus Ernst wrote:
I could imagine a hypothetic Web application that generates class names
from any other information, which may start with a digit. Thus class
names may not even be known at coding time. In that case, escaping all
digits might be a valuable alternative.
Far simpler would
Barney Carroll wrote:
I realise these are highly esoteric bugs that aren't part of the CSS
canon, and not being able to show the broken stuff (NDAs, sorry)
doesn't help
Since, almost by definition, you don't need the real content
during your development phase, can you not replace all copy
Barney Carroll wrote:
Hiya Elli,
On 30 March 2011 15:49, Elli Vizcainoelli...@yahoo.com wrote:
I forget what the rules are for naming classes and IDs
This question was answered very succinctly on stackoverflow:
Barney Carroll wrote:
The line between philosophy politics blurs! If it works, I'll do it.
If it doesn't I won't. The question is ideological and we could debate
it for yonks. Ultimately, I believe posters come here for practical
advice. If they were looking for the spec, a bot could do a
HallMarc Websites wrote:
Vive la difference!
First, I must disagree in the usage of inability; I don't believe that is
the reason they produce the product in the manner they do. I believe it is,
more likely, due to their vision and how they want the product to interpret
what we write. For
Doesn't just happen in IE. In Seamonkey at my
preferred settings, only the first seven fit.
Ctrl + and Ctrl - wreak further havoc.
Philip Taylor
Rory Bernstein wrote:
http://motherloadshow.com/
I'm back with another question about this same page. The main nav bar: I am
just using a
IE7 : Problems with this web page might prevent it from
being displayed properly or functioning properly.
Line 64, Char 9, Error : Object required.
Line 9, Char 3894, Error : 'null' is null or not an object.
Corkboard, and corresponding verso blank : displaced vertically
downwards by their full
Jarek Foksa wrote:
Is there a CSS vendor extension in WebKit that would allow me to
explicitely specify whether whitespace between elements should be
preserved or not?
This may seem an odd question, but why would you want
a solution that will work in only one family of browsers ?
Philip
Charles Miller wrote:
I did : I was just too shocked to comment, given that you had
suggested it was overkerned. Remember, please, Goudy's aphorism.
Might that be: First do no harm.:-)
I'll look earlier in the thread for the actual aphorism.
Look no further : A man who would
Gergely Buday wrote:
Hi there,
I would like to have the same height of background for two neighbouring divs at
http://www.math.bme.hu/~gergoe/
For the upper part I was able to set explicit height but for the lower
this is not possible as the text can be variable size. On irc I got
Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
If the code is not valid, you cannot predict how the page will be
displayed. Fixing it may solve your problem.
Quite correct.
Invalid HTML may *be* the issue. You cannot know until you have
fixed it.
Also correct.
The number of error shown may be misleading.
Matthew P. Johnson wrote:
Oh man what browser/os is this? It does not look right at all.
Any browser that supports minimum font size, I would imagine.
Philip Taylor
--
Not sent from my i-Pad, i-Phone, Blackberry, Blueberry, or any
such similar poseurs' toy, none of which would I be seen
Bobby Jack wrote:
I'm working on a layout that requires text to wrap around a positioned image.
In my case, I need an image in the bottom-right of a box, with text inside the
box. So I need the in-flow, wrapping properties of a float combined with the
positioning properties of an
David Laakso wrote:
I think TJK's drop-down may meet your requirement...
Script-free modern browsers / keyboard-friendly
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/keyboard_friendly_dropdown_menu/default.asp
Bearing in mind that the title of the thread
is ... /without javascript/, I am somewhat
Isn't that :
More options / Profile / CSS level 3 ?
Philip Taylor
Nancy Seeger wrote:
Hi All,
Maybe I'm being premature here but I really enjoy using some of the CSS3
techniques, of course making sure things degrade gracefully. Mostly using RGBA
with a backup hex, shadow boxes,
This is possibly relevant to Nancy's more recent query :
Philip and David,
If it were a snake... fantastic, I didn't know that had been added.
So in checking this out - what limits does it have? Are vendor prefixes
supported like Webkit etc?
Thanks,
Nancy
Philip Taylor
Sorry, attached message was lost in transit. Repeated below.
Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
This is possibly relevant to Nancy's more recent query :
Philip and David,
If it were a snake... fantastic, I didn't know that had been added.
So in checking this out - what limits does
Ingo Chao wrote:
HTML5:Rendering:Punctuation and decorations
says
br { content: '\A'; white-space: pre; }
But this doesn't seem to work in Safari and Chrome:
http://www.satzansatz.de/w3/break.html
Who is wrong?
Neither ? HTML 5 was, the last time I looked, simply
work in progress;
Barney Carroll wrote:
Philip,
there is no reason at all to adopt it [HTML5]
Stop being so cynical.
Cynical, Barney ? No, just realistic.
What about these awesome badges/t-shirts?
http://www.w3.org/html/logo/
No comment needed.
? And the fact that CSS3 is now part of HTML5?
What does
Barney Carroll wrote:
[long snip]
So while I sympathise with your reticence as to the shallow-minded,
naive, obscurantist hype surrounding 'HTML5', the HTML5 spec has given
me all sorts of wonderful stuff I'm not about to dismiss…
Fine, all understood, end of thread-digression :-)
** Phil.
Alan Gresley wrote:
I guess this HTML5 movement will just sit well with the current movement
of poor coding practices. I guess I show some of the cynicism of Philip
(Ret.). :-)
Welcome aboard, Alan :-)
--
Not sent from my i-Pad, i-Phone, Blackberry, Blueberry, or any
such similar poseurs'
Overshoots visible at intersection of up and right
lines in Seamonkey V2.0.11 @ 1152 x 864 dpi; screen-
shot available on request.
Philip Taylor
Alan Gresley wrote:
Hello,
After quite a few years with working with this family tree layout, I
believe I have accidentally added the
Gabriele Romanato wrote:
It took a little bit to find a good converter from FLV to OGV, but
finally I did it!
The video is 27 mb in size, so you have to be a little bit patient :-)
Results are encouraging, especially for future CSS3 enhancements:
Seamonkey 2.0.11 under Win/XP PRO;SP3
Ulrike Eikermann wrote:
Here is another Firefox Addon (Font Finder), which lets you click on
elements and tells you the font being rendered. Also it allows you
disable font families, which is useful when testing font stacks.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4415/
What happens
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
And even if you wrap them inside an inner span element, Font Finder
reports ASCII as being in use for the inner element, even though the
element contains no character representable in the font.
Argh : a potentially useful tool, perhaps, but by no means a perfect
Gabriele Romanato wrote:
Hi.
A couple of days ago a user posted here a message about object and
positioning. I've created a test page and a brief description that I
think it may be helpful for future use cases:
http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/01/css-positioning-object-element.html
As
Gabriele Romanato wrote:
Don't get me wrong but ... What is the percentage of use of Seamonkey? ;-)
Philip, as a rule of thumb, you should always test in major league
browsers, like IE, Firefox, Opera, Safari and Chrome.
Of course, it /could/ be something to with the following,
and nothing
Rory Bernstein wrote:
When I have a series of fonts being called in a font-family rule, how do I know
which one is the one being chosen?
You don't, unless JavaScript can tell you (see below).
On this page:
http://mcgivney.ehclients.com/locations/
The font should be the Titillium for the
Rich M wrote:
Hi,
I've revamped some forms in my application, but the display is
unexpected in IE8 / Windows 7 for me. I assume it's equally weird on
other OS and probably IE versions.
Would that be :
https://www.moremagicpoints.com/ ?
If so, Seamonkey doesn't like its
Gabriele Romanato wrote:
Hi all.
After my last post and all the responses that came after that, I first
decided to unsubscribe from css-d, but later I'm back again. Very
emotional, very Italian!
Welcome back, Gabriele :-)
And to add to your list of essentials, please do not forget
Did both you and Rob reduce the window width to 400px
as suggested ? Strange things happen when you do that
in Seamonkey 2.0.11 under Win/XP;SP3 @ 1152 x 864
Philip Taylor
Chetan Crasta wrote:
On my computer (ubuntu), there was absolutely no styling of any
element on the page. It
Kevin A. Cameron wrote:
To be honest this 'discussion' on the merits of this post was a far greater
waste of time than the post in question! :P
With respect, I disagree. Whilst Gabriele's weblog citations
were initially interesting, of late they have been coming so
frequently that I was
smallvoiceshout...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, titillium in those two instances. Wouldn't expect it to be
different but checked in Safari (win), Chrome, Opera, IE 7,8 and it's
present in all.
Bill
--
Hi,
I downloaded and installed Seamonkey 2.02 (Windows). Why not? :)
One reason would be because
Rory Bernstein wrote:
Ah. I see the light. OK, I just uploaded the OTF files. Can I now assume that
this font will show for most users?
Thank you so much for this help,
Rory
Trailer looks really horrible in Seamonkey 2.0.11 under
Windows/XP;SP3 at 1152 x 864, and 3 in page numbers
looks
Chetan Crasta wrote:
The issues described by Phillip are
due to Windows' horrible rendering of @font-face embedded fonts.
Windows XP, Vista and 7 do not correctly apply font smoothing to
embedded fonts. The issue affects all browsers on the windows
platform.
Do you have a citation for this,
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
In general, the fonts I've used did/do look pretty good on all Windows OS
Do have you have some sample pages that I can compare
with the Newton offering, Philippe ?
Philip Taylor
__
css-discuss
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Imho, using element#id to increase the weight of a rule makes sense, but not
when it is used as a hint to help us read and understand rules. I'd think
/*comments*/ are better suited for that.
I'm afraid I can't agree with that, Thierry : comments indicate
only the
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Well-written css code means *lean* selectors so a well written styles sheet
should need more comments than a badly written one, isn't?.
With respect, I disagree : you are choosing to interpret well-written
as efficient; I interpret well-written as transparent,
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
#mainmenu ul li#last #donations {font-size:1.24em;}
What is immediately clear to you in that rule?
That within an element of ID mainmenu will occur a UL;
within that, there will occur an LI of ID last; and
somewhere within that will occur an element of ID donations,
I don't know if it is just a case of excessive nostalgia, but
am I alone in thinking that the W3C CSS service is not what it
once was (in terms of Q.A., that is) ? I ask because I have
recently thrown a number of putatively CSS documents at it,
the most recent being :
Alan Gresley wrote:
What do you inspect to happen with embed font? The validator sees your
CSS as junk. Why don't you try to validate as CSS3.
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Flettershop.ehclients.com%2Fcss%2Fall.cssprofile=css3usermedium=allwarning=1lang=en
Alan Gresley wrote:
What the validator sees it as is not my point; what I was expecting
was a meaningful diagnostic, such as
2 Value Error : font-family Property font-family doesn't exist in
CSS level 2.1 but exists in CSS level 3
Firstly it treats this as valid CSS2.1.
(snip)
OK, but
Before providing feedback, David, I am trying to establish
whether there is a real problem or whether there is an
error of perception. Which is why it would be nice to
try and achieve consensus on this list as to whether or
not the validator is behaving aberrantly before raising
it with the W3C
Alan Gresley wrote:
Property src doesn't exist :
url('../fonts/TitilliumText22L005-webfont.eot')
url('../fonts/TitilliumText22L005-webfont.eot')
Which is almost the same as you were seeking.
No it's not : it's totally different. What I am seeking
is a mention of this property src that does
So : I have simplified Rory's all.css down to the shortest
fragment than can generate a diagnostic from the validator :
@font-face
{
font-family:foo;
}
Here is what the validator says :
Property font-family doesn't exist in CSS level 2.1 but exists in : foo foo
Would other CSS-D
Alan Gresley wrote:
Then this is what feedback you can give.
Take this string.
svg {opacity:0.5}
The report back is.
Property opacity doesn't exist in CSS level 2.1 but exists in : 0.5 0.5
A little over a week ago, it did say but exists in CSS level 3
Fine, so we agree : the validator
Not convinced you are doing your client any favours
by using that : I have to zoom in by a factor of
four before the glyphs stop breaking up :-(
Seamonkey 2.0.11, Win/XP;SP3 @ 1152 x 864.
Philip Taylor
Rory Bernstein wrote:
Hi,
I am using a google-hosted embedded web font called
Rory Bernstein wrote:
Thanks for the screenshots, Phillip.
You're very welcome.
What I find most disturbing is that the other font (the sans
serif one) is not even showing up for you; it is rendering in
some other font. (I'm talking about the grey, all caps items in
the nav bar). How
Tim Climis wrote:
#left {
float: left;
width: 30%;
}
#right {
float: right;
width: 25%;
}
#center {
margin-left: 30%;
margin-right: 25%;
min-height: 12em; /* min-height does not work in IE6 */
}
The problem is surely in the
Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
When you say 'two or more unrelated effects', then I think we should
discuss whether it *is* two unrelated effects. I don't really see that
it is.
OK, let me try to explain, based on your web page in which you
raise this idea, and with some real TOCs to demonstrate
Not run-in (see http://web-consultants.org.uk/sites/Gabriele/SS-1.jpg);
was this intended ?
Philip Taylor
Gabriele Romanato wrote:
I don't know what vacations are:
http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/12/css-hanging-drop-cap.html
Alan Gresley wrote:
It's time now to drop the prefixes. Now if you wish to debate this, then
please feel most welcome to subscribe to the CSS WG list. Not that you
will stop anything.
How are those not involved in the current discussion intended to
interpret that last sentence, Alan ? Are
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
