Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-20 Thread Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)
FWIW, I think that Ghodmode has every right to ask why HTML e-mails are prohibited on this list, even though I personally rejoice that they are. I also appreciate the non-confrontational way in which he has presented his views and responded to the view of others. However. In my e-mail client

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-20 Thread Geoff Lane
On Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 12:59:45 AM, Ghodmode wrote: There aren't any contemporary email applications that can't handle HTML. Is anyone using one? --- Er.. I am. At least, I'm using an email client that doesn't by default render HTML (it also doesn't retrieve external resources such as

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-20 Thread Tim Climis
On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 12:12:26 pm Ghodmode wrote: Ya I shouldn't have said there aren't any, but I was hoping someone would comment with the name of one that doesn't. No one has yet... Not even you. What's TA-ships? Teaching assistantships. Any grad student teaching a class, which is

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-20 Thread Ghodmode
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Mark Henderson shadefro...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 July 2011 11:59, Ghodmode ghodm...@ghodmode.com wrote: Okay, so I change my email settings every time I send to CSS-discuss so that it's plain-text, but I have to ask... why? In case you haven't already

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-20 Thread Alan Gresley
On 20/07/2011 2:29 PM, Ghodmode wrote: I'm not going anywhere, but you have a point. Some people seem to be disproportionately upset by the topic. The reason that text is used is mainly due to security issues and encoding (mono-space). My email client is permanently set to only show text

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-20 Thread Ghodmode
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Alan Gresley a...@css-class.com wrote: On 20/07/2011 2:29 PM, Ghodmode wrote: I'm not going anywhere, but you have a point.  Some people seem to be disproportionately upset by the topic. The reason that text is used is mainly due to security issues and

[css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-19 Thread Ghodmode
Okay, so I change my email settings every time I send to CSS-discuss so that it's plain-text, but I have to ask... why? Is it a CSS-Discuss community policy, or the policy of an individual who happens to be the list administrator? I suspect that it's based on old practices for reasons that are

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-19 Thread Bjoern Hoehrmann
* Ghodmode wrote: Is it a CSS-Discuss community policy, or the policy of an individual who happens to be the list administrator? I suspect that it's based on old practices for reasons that are no longer valid. Noting that this kind of discussion, even of marked offtopic, is usually not

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-19 Thread Ghodmode
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net wrote: * Ghodmode wrote: Is it a CSS-Discuss community policy, or the policy of an individual who happens to be the list administrator?  I suspect that it's based on old practices for reasons that are no longer valid. Noting

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-19 Thread Ghodmode
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Ben Henick lurker...@henick.net wrote: There aren't any contemporary email applications that can't handle HTML.  Is anyone using one? There are very few that handle it genuinely well, and the most commonly used e-mail client implements an ancient rendering

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-19 Thread Ted Rolle Jr.
I just performed a test with a short message: Unadorned: This is yellow. This is Garamond typeface. This is Comic Sans typeface. This is BOLD. This is italicized. This is underlined. This is in a different size. Note emoticon --- Adorned: This is yellow. *This is underlined.* This is

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-19 Thread Tim Climis
On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 7:59:45 am Ghodmode wrote: There aren't any contemporary email applications that can't handle HTML. Is anyone using one? This obviously isn't true, as we've heard from at least two people. I work for a major American university, and the email system all our

[css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-19 Thread Ghodmode
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Ed Seedhouse eseedho...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Ghodmode ghodm...@ghodmode.com wrote: Any html email i get gets dumped straight into the trash bin by my mail reader, at my instruction.  HTML is a web page markup language. Email is

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-19 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Jul 20, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Ghodmode wrote: Troll? I'm surprised the listmom hasn't called a halt to this discussion yet. Hopefully he will do so soon. PS - I'd be the first to unsubscribe if this this list start allowing html mail. Philippe -- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com/

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-19 Thread Micky Hulse
gmail + html emails + iphone mail.app = hard to read I wish gmail had an option to strip HTML from all incoming e-mails. Sorry to contribute to this OT thread... :: crawls back into hole :: __ css-discuss

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-19 Thread Claude Needham
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Micky Hulse mickyhulse.li...@gmail.com wrote: gmail + html emails + iphone mail.app = hard to read I wish gmail had an option to strip HTML from all incoming e-mails. Sorry to contribute to this OT thread... :: crawls back into hole :: I've seen the screen

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-19 Thread Ted Rolle Jr.
sigh Here is the usual course of these conversations: People fight about something trivial (However, I don't believe this issue is trivial!) All leave the list forever for two weeks. Then come back and ignore each other. ... Ted, almost 70, and appreciates the ability to change type faces/sizes in

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-19 Thread Ghodmode
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Tim Climis tim.cli...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 7:59:45 am Ghodmode wrote: There aren't any contemporary email applications that can't handle HTML.  Is anyone using one? This obviously isn't true, as we've heard from at least two people.

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-19 Thread Ghodmode
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Claude Needham gxx...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Micky Hulse mickyhulse.li...@gmail.com wrote: gmail + html emails + iphone mail.app = hard to read I wish gmail had an option to strip HTML from all incoming e-mails. Sorry to

Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML

2011-07-19 Thread Ghodmode
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Ted Rolle Jr. ster...@gmail.com wrote: sigh Here is the usual course of these conversations: People fight about something trivial (However, I don't believe this issue is trivial!) All leave the list forever for two weeks. Then come back and ignore each