snak detek+0r wrote:
Nothing silly about that page in my humble opinion. The page is
short because there is not much content on it. If you want it, and
other pages that may have little content, to appear deeper-- get
creative and add a generic image beneath the text of same.
sigh.
yes yes, i know. but that will break my background image. that's what i
was trying to say before: the only reason i used overflow:hidden is that
it somehow made the bg work (what i'm talking about visually is that the
main/middle section of that vertical silver divider line).
i see now that
snak detek+0r wrote:
yes yes, i know. but that will break my background image. that's what i
was trying to say before: the only reason i used overflow:hidden is that
it somehow made the bg work (what i'm talking about visually is that the
main/middle section of that vertical silver divider
snak detek+0r wrote:
trimmed
actually, since i got to check this on ie6 today, i did notice a huge
problem (perhaps better asked under separate cover; not sure?). the
problem can be easily seen here:
http://tinyurl.com/nd27cr
IE/6 does not support min-height and is honoring
That's good to know. I guess it's not surprising; it is, however, rather
disconcerting. My basic instinct is to set the base at 10px, simply so i
can work in units that I'm used to. If everything is multiples of ten it
makes ems a much more intelligible unit too. I guess I've been going
about
David Laakso wrote:
...
IE/6 does not support min-height and is honoring height:500px;
The correction is to let content determine height. Compliant browsers,
and IE/7 will all go along with this; and, IE/6 will follow suit.
#content { border: 1px solid red (4 position only--delete);
On 2009/05/31 18:14 (GMT-0400) snak detek+0r composed:
My basic instinct is to set the base at 10px, simply so i
can work in units that I'm used to. If everything is multiples of ten it
makes ems a much more intelligible unit too
10 does seem easy on the surface, as most of us are
Index and all inside pages: Neither Opera or The IEs are capable of
scaling line-height set in pixels. Try a raw number for line-height.
wow. didn't even know i could do that. the w3 site doesn't even
mention that you can use px, but everyone and their mom seem to,
including ALA, some
snak detek+0r wrote:
Oh, I understand what you're suggesting now. And yes, that doesn't
interfere with my tiling background. But it does end up with certain
pages looking a little silly:
http://tinyurl.com/mfyyuf
Nothing silly about that page in my humble opinion. The page is
short
On 2009/05/31 19:19 (GMT-0400) snak detek+0r composed:
Since I'm still trying to get my mind around this (and the w3 rules are
quite hard to parse IMO), I was just playing around with my own styles
when I noticed that the original base line-height value for this project
was set using %:
snak detek+0r wrote:
Index and all inside pages: Neither Opera or The IEs are capable of
scaling line-height set in pixels. Try a raw number for
line-height.
wow. didn't even know i could do that. the w3 site doesn't even
mention that you can use px, but everyone and their mom seem to,
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
snak detek+0r wrote:
[...]
Index: Minimum font-size 24px breaks the h-nav and does a little
number on the text in right column.
i'm not sure what you mean by this? i don't have any fonts nearly
that big. and i also couldn't see what you're talking about in
On 2009/05/30 09:45 (GMT-0700) David Hucklesby composed:
FWIW - I have set a modest minimum font size of 12px on my browsers. My
primary browser, Opera 9.6 on Mac, scales up _all_ fonts on pages that
have the seemingly popular 62.5% font-size set on BODY. It amazes me how
many pages break
snak detek+0r wrote:
Subject: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?
there are two different layouts, front page
http://tinyurl.com/pxgydd
and all other pages
http://tinyurl.com/msyk76
fingers crossed,
thanks!
No amount of finger-crossing will solve the 404s on both style sheet
David, thanks for your gracious feedback. unfortunately, i'm not sure if
i understand much of what you had to say (my comprehension stats are
usually pretty decent too); explanation below. also, at the bottom is a
newly discovered problem its the sort of thing i can't reason, but that
i know
there are two different layouts, front page
http://tinyurl.com/pxgydd
and all other pages
http://tinyurl.com/msyk76
fingers crossed,
thanks!
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
snak detek+0r wrote:
there are two different layouts, front page
http://tinyurl.com/pxgydd
and all other pages
http://tinyurl.com/msyk76
Index and all inside pages: Neither Opera or The IEs are capable of
scaling line-height set in pixels. Try a raw number for line-height.
Index:
17 matches
Mail list logo
