[css-d] CSS Table

2011-12-12 Thread David Laakso
I am messing around with a CSS Table layout that uses table-layout: fixed;. The layout appears to be fine in an Android/2.2.2 mobile-handset; however, I need to know if the same is true in current versions of iPad and iPhone. markup http://chelseacreekstudio.com/z/ css embedded Thanks.

Re: [css-d] CSS Table

2011-12-12 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Dec 12, 2011, at 5:05 PM, David Laakso wrote: I am messing around with a CSS Table layout that uses table-layout: fixed;. The layout appears to be fine in an Android/2.2.2 mobile-handset; however, I need to know if the same is true in current versions of iPad and iPhone. markup

[css-d] style attribute with display: none on style tag

2011-12-12 Thread Joergen W. Lang
I've come across some sites that use the following code in the head section: style type=text/css style=display:none I suspect it is there to either a) prevent people from exposing their code b) prevent search engines from seeing their code Is there any documentation of this? Pointers,

Re: [css-d] style attribute with display: none on style tag

2011-12-12 Thread Jukka K. Korpela
2011-12-12 13:08, Joergen W. Lang wrote: I've come across some sites that use the following code in the head section: style type=text/css style=display:none It would be interesting to see some sample URLs, as that could let us find out why they are doing that. I suspect it is there to

Re: [css-d] style attribute with display: none on style tag

2011-12-12 Thread Joergen W. Lang
Am 12.12.11 12:48, schrieb Jukka K. Korpela: 2011-12-12 13:08, Joergen W. Lang wrote: I've come across some sites that use the following code in the head section: style type=text/css style=display:none It would be interesting to see some sample URLs, as that could let us find out why they

Re: [css-d] footer not clearing main content in IE7

2011-12-12 Thread Chetan Crasta
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Debbie Campbell d...@redkitecreative.comwrote: In this WordPress site, only in IE7, the footer (outlined in red) isn't clearing the main container:

Re: [css-d] IE7 css box class not working

2011-12-12 Thread Chetan Crasta
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Carol Swinehart ckfswebdevelopm...@gmail.com wrote: www.socilfairfieldhocking.org/index6.html on this page you will see where in the leftcol div .box The .box tag does not work in the css as the first box is code that way and is not working. The other

Re: [css-d] off-topic gmail delay

2011-12-12 Thread Boray ERIS
When you click to reply button email is replied To the sender of email. Try reply all. On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 02:30, mem talofo.l...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I've asked some questions and I had some answers. I've also replied to those answers. So please do not take me as rude for not

[css-d] Puzzling rendering difference

2011-12-12 Thread Chris Morton
I'm baffled: Why does this page http://www.eigen.com/about/partners.cfm display correctly, but this page http://www.eigen.com/about/partners2.cfm does not? __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]

Re: [css-d] Puzzling rendering difference

2011-12-12 Thread David Laakso
On 12/12/2011 6:32 PM, Chris Morton wrote: I'm baffled: Why does this pagehttp://www.eigen.com/about/partners.cfm display correctly, but this pagehttp://www.eigen.com/about/partners2.cfm does not? Narrow the field: Does it not display correctly in Opera, Safari, Firefox, SeaMonkey,

[css-d] Fluid layout cross-browser rendering

2011-12-12 Thread David Odefey
I'm working on a fluid layout. It is rending how i would like in Chrome 15, but breaks in FF 8 (win7) I've inspected that computed layout in firebug (FF) and I have an excess of 1px. content w=1431 blog w = 961 sidebar w = 471 = 1432 I can easily hack a solution by reducing any

Re: [css-d] panotour problem

2011-12-12 Thread Chetan Crasta
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:13 AM, virtual tours virtualtours.co...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all - a friend suggested I post here with the hope that someone could help - so here goes: I'm redoing a 360 panoramic website at www.virtualtours.co.cc but am having a problem displaying the swf files in

Re: [css-d] Fluid layout cross-browser rendering

2011-12-12 Thread Chetan Crasta
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:19 AM, David Odefey dode...@gmail.com wrote: I'm working on a fluid layout. It is rending how i would like in Chrome 15, but breaks in FF 8 (win7) It is hard to troubleshoot the problem without a link to the page. It is far too time consuming to take your code,

Re: [css-d] Fluid layout cross-browser rendering

2011-12-12 Thread David Odefey
The page is part of a project in development, and it is dynamic. I copied the view source to get a static snapshot and uploaded it along with the css to: http://odefeydesign.com/problem/ again, chrome-fine, firefox, breaks (by 1px) Thanks for taking a look On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Chetan

Re: [css-d] Fluid layout cross-browser rendering

2011-12-12 Thread Chetan Crasta
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:08 AM, David Odefey dode...@gmail.com wrote: The page is part of a project in development, and it is dynamic. I copied the view source to get a static snapshot and uploaded it along with the css to: http://odefeydesign.com/problem/ again, chrome-fine, firefox,

Re: [css-d] Fluid layout cross-browser rendering

2011-12-12 Thread David Odefey
Thanks for the feedback. I was hoping there was a solution that allowed me to keep both my percentage based widths as well as the static width borders. If I can't find a way to do this I am planning on reducing one of the widths a bit. I wish there was a way to do something like .selector {

Re: [css-d] Fluid layout cross-browser rendering

2011-12-12 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Dec 13, 2011, at 2:25 PM, David Odefey wrote: Thanks for the feedback. I was hoping there was a solution that allowed me to keep both my percentage based widths as well as the static width borders. You could float your sidebar to the right and set its margin-left to 0, that would fix

Re: [css-d] Fluid layout cross-browser rendering

2011-12-12 Thread Chetan Crasta
One last question, does anyone know how many decimal places you can use when setting pixel and percentages in CSS? In my experience it seems like fonts allow finer accuracy (i've used ems values like 2.4) but widths seem only to allow #.0 and #.5. Any info or references about this? IE6

Re: [css-d] Fluid layout cross-browser rendering

2011-12-12 Thread David Odefey
Hey, thanks Phillipe! Don't know why I didn't think about that. I go to float:left by default always, I guess. Thanks also for the reference to the W3 spec. That was exactly what I wanted to know. Is the full functionality of this recommendation implemented by the big browsers? On Mon, Dec

Re: [css-d] Fluid layout cross-browser rendering

2011-12-12 Thread David Odefey
Thanks again Chetan. Do have a link to a reference about this info? I try to keep all that kind of information clipped or bookmarked. David On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Chetan Crasta chetancra...@gmail.comwrote: One last question, does anyone know how many decimal places you can use

Re: [css-d] Fluid layout cross-browser rendering

2011-12-12 Thread Chetan Crasta
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:27 AM, David Odefey dode...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks again Chetan. Do have a link to a reference about this info? I try to keep all that kind of information clipped or bookmarked. David IE6 and IE7 ignore the decimal part in percentage values and px values, and

Re: [css-d] Fluid layout cross-browser rendering

2011-12-12 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Dec 13, 2011, at 2:55 PM, David Odefey wrote: Is the full functionality of this recommendation implemented by the big browsers? http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/ is still a draft, as mentioned at the top of the document. Rendering engines are in the process of implementing it. Some parts

Re: [css-d] style attribute with display: none on style tag

2011-12-12 Thread Joergen W. Lang
Am 12.12.11 15:42, schrieb Jukka K. Korpela: 2011-12-12 15:50, Joergen W. Lang wrote: style type=text/css style=display:none It would be interesting to see some sample URLs, as that could let us find out why they are doing that. http://www.quirksmode.org/