On 15/07/2007 12:19, Stephen Oravec wrote:
http://www.intheholler.com
Win XP - FF 2.0.0.4 - fine
Opera 9.20 - fine
IE6 - not fine.
1. The darker green borders on the headings e.g. What's New are
very thick. They look ~1em thick.
2. The right-hand side column moves beneath the left-hand side
cols. horizontal scrolling would be reduced.
I found the Header text a bit difficult to read.
Ernie. :)
From: Stephen Oravec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: [css-d] site check please
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:19:53 -0400
http://www.intheholler.com
HI,
I could use a confirmation that this site: www.sunsetmusic.biz is not
showing bad floats in IE6.
Prior to my fixes it was pushing content on the home page way down.
Thanks,
dstefani
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/13/07, Don Stefani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI,
I could use a confirmation that this site: www.sunsetmusic.biz is not
showing bad floats in IE6.
I can confirm on IE6 / Windows 2000 that it looks correct.
Brian
__
Gary Benson wrote:
My rationale for only putting a couple
of questions in the Find out more box was so the reader wasn't
bombarded with information. There's only five questions on the site
now, but I plan to write several more.
Rather than putting all the questions on every page, how
Dagmar Noll wrote:
Gary Benson wrote:
My rationale for only putting a couple of questions in the Find
out more box was so the reader wasn't bombarded with information.
There's only five questions on the site now, but I plan to write
several more.
Rather than putting all the questions
Hi all,
Could I trouble you for site check of http://www.relaxshiatsu.co.uk/
please? I use Firefox on Linux so Windows and Mac checks are
especially welcome, as are any general comments and suggestions you
may have.
If it helps, this is what I see when I look at it:
On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:20 AM, Gary Benson wrote:
Hi all,
Could I trouble you for site check of http://www.relaxshiatsu.co.uk/
please? I use Firefox on Linux so Windows and Mac checks are
especially welcome, as are any general comments and suggestions you
may have.
If it helps, this is
Gary Benson wrote:
Hi all,
Could I trouble you for site check of http://www.relaxshiatsu.co.uk/
please? I use Firefox on Linux so Windows and Mac checks are
especially welcome, as are any general comments and suggestions you
may have.
If it helps, this is what I see when I look at it:
Mark Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:20 AM, Gary
Benson wrote:
Hi all,
Could I trouble you for site check of http://www.relaxshiatsu.co.uk/
please? I use Firefox on Linux so Windows and Mac checks are
especially welcome, as are any general comments and suggestions
Gary Benson wrote:
Hi all,
Could I trouble you for site check of http://www.relaxshiatsu.co.uk/
please? I use Firefox on Linux so Windows and Mac checks are
especially welcome, as are any general comments and suggestions you
may have.
Looks great Gary. The curve problem that Ray
--- Gary Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Could I trouble you for site check of
http://www.relaxshiatsu.co.uk/
please? I use Firefox on Linux so Windows and Mac
checks are
especially welcome, as are any general comments and
suggestions you
may have.
If it helps, this is what
Gary Benson a écrit :
Hi all,
Could I trouble you for site check of http://www.relaxshiatsu.co.uk/
please? I use Firefox on Linux so Windows and Mac checks are
especially welcome, as are any general comments and suggestions you
may have.
If it helps, this is what I see when I look at it:
Hi all,
Could I trouble you for site check of http://www.relaxshiatsu.co.uk/
please? I use Firefox on Linux so Windows and Mac checks are
especially welcome, as are any general comments and suggestions you
may have.
If it helps, this is what I see when I look at it:
I think you
should keep the navigation at the bottom of page in
the Find Out More section, consistent. I think it's
confusing for the user for the links to be shifting
from page to page. You should offer all links to all
your questions, even if you have a link to the
Questions at the top.
Matthew Ohlman wrote:
Gary Benson wrote:
Could I trouble you for site check of http://www.relaxshiatsu.co.uk/
please? I use Firefox on Linux so Windows and Mac checks are
especially welcome, as are any general comments and suggestions you
may have.
Looks great Gary. The curve problem
Luis Speciale wrote:
Gary Benson a écrit :
Could I trouble you for site check of http://www.relaxshiatsu.co.uk/
please?
[snip]
By the way, why you use zoom ? Sorry, but I don't understand.
#findOutMore {
zoom: 1;
}
It forces hasLayout on the #findOutMore div which stops it
extending
Dagmar Noll wrote:
Elli Vizcaino wrote:
I think you should keep the navigation at the bottom of page in
the Find Out More section, consistent. I think it's confusing
for the user for the links to be shifting from page to page. You
should offer all links to all your questions, even if you
On 09-Jul-07, at 8:54 AM, Frank Burleigh wrote:
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
On 09-Jul-07, at 5:13 AM, Frank Burleigh wrote:
Hello, list. We've been working on this site:
http://firms.law.indiana.edu/about/blank.shtml
I'd appreciate your review. I'm interested in any critique you'd
care
to
Hello, list. We've been working on this site:
http://firms.law.indiana.edu/about/blank.shtml
devoted to the empirical research of law firms and markets.
The intended audience is an academic one, and the browser level is the
Geckos, IE 6 and 7, Safari, hopefully Opera--behaving browsers plus
Hi Once again
On 29/06/07, David Hucklesby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:28:58 +0100, Richard Brown wrote:
Could someone take a quick look at this site in IE please? I think the
third
column is dropping below the 1st. Is that correct?
Hi All
On 27/06/07, Richard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone take a quick look at this site in IE please? I think the
third column is dropping below the 1st. Is that correct?
http://www.familywealthdifference.com/blog/
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:28:58 +0100, Richard Brown wrote:
Hi All
On 27/06/07, Richard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone take a quick look at this site in IE please? I think the
third
column is dropping below the 1st. Is that correct?
http://www.familywealthdifference.com/blog/
Hi
On 26/06/07, Richard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone take a quick look at this site in IE please? I think the
third column is dropping below the 1st. Is that correct?
http://www.familywealthdifference.com/blog/
Richard Brown wrote:
Hi
On 26/06/07, Richard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone take a quick look at this site in IE please? I think the
third column is dropping below the 1st. Is that correct?
http://www.familywealthdifference.com/blog/
Hi David
On 27/06/07, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone take a quick look at this site in IE please? I think the
third column is dropping below the 1st. Is that correct?
http://www.familywealthdifference.com/blog/
Hi All
On 27/06/07, Richard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27/06/07, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone take a quick look at this site in IE please? I think the
third column is dropping below the 1st. Is that correct?
http://www.familywealthdifference.com/blog/
Hallo Matthew,
I hope this delay response helps to further reaffirm the advice given so
far...
For what its worth, I am one of those folks using an iMac Flat panel 800Ghz.
I have IE 5.2Mac and have never used it personally, other than when I was
checking site I was building.
IE5 Mac was just a
Hi
Could someone take a quick look at this site in IE please? I think the
third column is dropping below the 1st. Is that correct?
http://www.familywealthdifference.com/blog/
http://familywealthdifference.com/blog/wp-content/themes/FWPItheme2/style.css
Thanks.
--
Rich
http://www.cregy.co.uk
Richard Brown wrote:
Hi
Could someone take a quick look at this site in IE please? I think the third
column is dropping below the 1st. Is that correct?
http://www.familywealthdifference.com/blog/
http://familywealthdifference.com/blog/wp-content/themes/FWPItheme2/style.css
Thanks.
Yes,
Jason Crosse wrote:
Richard Brown wrote:
Hi
Could someone take a quick look at this site in IE please? I think the third
column is dropping below the 1st. Is that correct?
http://www.familywealthdifference.com/blog/
David Laakso wrote:
Matthew Ohlman wrote:
... I would especially appreciate a review of IE on Mac if possible
since I do not have access to a Mac. General comments and suggestions
are very much appreciated if you have any.
The site is: http://www.ohlman.com/sldc/index.html
IE Mac:
in
Ingo Chao wrote:
IE Mac:
in general: if you need to support IE-Mac, buy a Mac :) and read
Philippe's IE-Mac bugs and oddities pages.
http://www.l-c-n.com/IE5tests/
Lol - yes read them,
and buy a Mac.
[...]
2)
right column drops down
- if you, for some reasons, don't want to filter the
Matthew Ohlman wrote:
Good Evening CSS-D,
I was hoping someone could give me a quick site check on the following
design. I would especially appreciate a review of IE on Mac if possible
since I do not have access to a Mac. General comments and suggestions are
very much appreciated if
Hello,
I have been told that there are blank spots (white) in internet
explorer on pc.
Can you please check this site http://www.lankafest.com/ and tell
me what can be done to avoid that.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
css-discuss
rashantha de silva wrote:
Hello,
I have been told that there are blank spots (white) in internet explorer on
pc.
Can you please check this site http://www.lankafest.com/ and tell me what
can be done to avoid that.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, there are whitish parts in IE - it looks to me
Jason, Ingo, and David,
Thanks so much for your input and time. I made a few of the changes you
suggested, but I don't guess I will go to far trying to support for
IE/Mac. I guess the number of users using that combination would be
slim these days, plus I don't think I will get very far
Matthew,
Thought I'd chip in.
I've been using a Mac for years, and not even I know how to get hold of a
Mac with IE5 now. Microsoft ditched it years ago. I think it was out on some
of the first builds of OSX and on old OS9.
If I was developing Google I'd develop for it, but if it's for a
rashantha de silva wrote:
Hello,
I have been told that there are blank spots (white) in internet explorer on
pc.
Can you please check this site http://www.lankafest.com/ and tell me what
can be
done to avoid that.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason replied:
Yes, there are whitish parts in
Hi Everyone
Could someone do a site check in Internet Explorer please I think
there are some spacing issues.
I'm also not seeing the colour specified in the navigation on mouse
over - works fine in firefox and Opera
any suggestions please
I've also put a random Image generator on the
Hi Phil,
Phil Turner wrote:
Hi Everyone
Could someone do a site check in Internet Explorer please I think
there are some spacing issues.
I'm also not seeing the colour specified in the navigation on mouse
over - works fine in firefox and Opera
any suggestions please
I don't see spacing
Phil Turner wrote:
Hi Everyone
Could someone do a site check in Internet Explorer please I think
there are some spacing issues.
I'm also not seeing the colour specified in the navigation on mouse
over - works fine in firefox and Opera
any suggestions please
Phil, Looking closer I see
Good Evening CSS-D,
I was hoping someone could give me a quick site check on the following
design. I would especially appreciate a review of IE on Mac if possible
since I do not have access to a Mac. General comments and suggestions
are very much appreciated if you have any.
The site is:
Good Evening CSS-D,
I was hoping someone could give me a quick site check on the following
design. I would especially appreciate a review of IE on Mac if possible
since I do not have access to a Mac. General comments and suggestions
are very much appreciated if you have any.
The site is:
Matthew Ohlman wrote:
Good Evening CSS-D,
I was hoping someone could give me a quick site check on the following
design. I would especially appreciate a review of IE on Mac if possible
since I do not have access to a Mac. General comments and suggestions
are very much appreciated if you
can you tell me if this works on ie 6 on pc.
http://www.lankafest.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information --
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 18:28:42 -0700, rashantha de silva wrote:
can you tell me if this works on ie 6 on pc.
http://www.lankafest.com/
No, it doesn't. Sorry.
Testing on Win xp Pro using standalone IE6 --
#1 The PNG fix is not working
#2 Can only resize *some* text by using accessibility
Exactly what David said - this is precisely what I'm seeing on IE6,
Windows XP.
~Shelly
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information --
Good Morning;
I have very slowly learned how to use CSS for text formating etc. and use
those techniques on most of my new pages.
I have now created my first CSS layout page and would appreciatesome
feedback from the experts before converting hundreds of pages.
Please take a look at
Hi folks,
I would appreciate it if anyone interested would quickly scan through
http://ids.mediumcool.com.
I think most cross-browser issues are solved -- except for two.
First, on any page below the home page, there is a bread crumb trail. In IE6
and 7, the first link in the trail -- Home --
See this Tom,
http://htmlfixit.com/?p=1013
The advice there should fix your son of suckerfish issue I suspect.
Don
Second, I am using the son of Suckerfish menus. In Safari, when you move
over a choice to reveal the submenu, things appear okay -- until you move
onto one of the submenu's
At 10:15 AM 5/30/2007, you wrote:
I would appreciate it if anyone interested would quickly scan through
http://ids.mediumcool.com.
Hi Tom,
I'm sorry but I'm not going to be able to help
you with your problem but I did want to mention
that the one red guy in the background ... very clever idea!
Tom McNeer wrote:
Hi folks,
I would appreciate it if anyone interested would quickly scan through
http://ids.mediumcool.com.
I think most cross-browser issues are solved -- except for two.
First, on any page below the home page, there is a bread crumb trail. In IE6
and 7, the first link
Tom McNeer wrote:
Deb,
Thanks for the compliment. As far as validation goes, are you
referring to HTML or CSS validation? The W3C CSS validator simply
throws a servlet error, and has been doing so for a long time; so I
haven't been able to validate the CSS, although it's not different
Hello everyone!
I finally finished the website of the company for which I work, and I would
like to thank those which helped me on several occasions in my peregrination
CSS.
The home page contains an switcher of layout script at the redimensioning of
the screen, the other pages will be
Sébastien FICHOT wrote:
The home page contains an switcher of layout script at the redimensioning of
the screen, the other pages will be modified very soon.
URL: http://www.aricie.net/eshop
Sebastien,
I think it will be necessary to validate the markup. You have 222 errors
on the
Hi,
Would it be possible to check this site on any major css flaws in
different browsers ?
I have tested Safari, IE 6/7 firefox
Thanks in advance
Silvester
URL: http://home.rosedev.nl/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The navigation looks nice, like the image sprites.
But when the text is resized with the browser (in firefox), the #infobar div
gets pushed down, and the #menu sprite images are exposed.
Could you adjust the positioning of #infobar to fix this?
Silvester Kok wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to check this site on any major css flaws in
different browsers ?
I have tested Safari, IE 6/7 firefox
Thanks in advance
Silvester
URL: http://home.rosedev.nl/
Opera/9.20
Camino/1.0.4
IE/6 and 7
The horizontal nav is breaking a
Matt,
I have tried this, but because the navigation is based on a list it
sizes with the text. overflow: hidden does not
do the trick.
Silvester
On May 23, 2007, at 7:30 PM, Matt McCool wrote:
The navigation looks nice, like the image sprites.
But when the text is resized with the
David
Thanks, header images are in Flash player 8 and 9 so that might be
the problem. Need a fix for this too. Again thanks.
Regards,
ROSE Development
Silvester Kok
On May 23, 2007, at 7:54 PM, David Laakso wrote:
Silvester Kok wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to check this site on any
On 5/9/07, Mauricio Samy Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brian
Add the following CSS:
#navcontainer UL li {width:100%}
Thank you Mauricio
-Bdot
There are only 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who understand
binary and those who don't
Hi,
I would like a general site check for this website
http://tourism.temple.edu/smartbaltimore/default.aspx
Can you just tell me what you think or anything you think I should
change. The menu does not look right in IE6 so if someone could help
me with the CSS for that, that would be great.
Hi Brian
From: Brian Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [css-d] Site Check and CSS help
http://tourism.temple.edu/smartbaltimore/default.aspx
The menu does not look right in IE6 so if someone could help
me with the CSS for that, that would be great.
Add the following CSS:
#navcontainer UL li
From: Dave M G [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://formever.org
IE6 is dead to me now.
While this is certainly your, and your clients choice not to support IE6, it
seems a little shortsighted. I'd to point out just a couple of things.
First, there are undoubtedly many, many people who _cannot_ run IE7
Lori, David, CSS-d,
Thank you very much for your comments, and taking the time to be so
helpful. If it's not too much to bear, I have some follow up questions.
FWIW, a level 2 heading is missing.
I'm sorry, what does this mean?
Ditch the validation buttons?
Really? I tried to make them
Dave M G [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:08:25 -0500, wrote:
Site looks OK in the browsers listed below.
To stop the design breaking below 400px, you might consider giving the
body both a min-width: x; where x is a sufficient number of pixels to
hold the page unbroken. You could use
Dave M G wrote:
Lori, David, CSS-d,
Thank you very much for your comments, and taking the time to be so
helpful. If it's not too much to bear, I have some follow up questions.
FWIW, a level 2 heading is missing.
I'm sorry, what does this mean?
RE: http://formever.org
It is called
On 2007/04/26 12:55 (GMT+0900) Dave M G apparently typed:
I've settled on a design that I'm happy with, and I'd like to invite
people to make comments, both technical and artistic.
http://formever.org
As far as technical commentary goes:
It should display correctly in FireFox. I'm using
David L, David G,Felix,
Thank you for your clarifications and comments.
David L:
There is no h2 now, but there will be lots of h2 in dynamic content,
so I think that's okay.
Fair point about the validation buttons. The theory is, though, that the
site will validate, so hopefully those nit
On 2007/04/26 13:02 (GMT-0400) Dave M G apparently typed:
After I posted my last message, I took a look at the prices for the
browser viewing service. Definitely out of my price range. I guess I'll
just have to keep politely asking here on this list for help...
Running Linux need not be an
Dave M G wrote:
David L, David G,Felix,
After I posted my last message, I took a look at the prices for the
browser viewing service. Definitely out of my price range. I guess
I'll just have to keep politely asking here on this list for help...
OK. Don't wait for my offer to let you know
I am new to this list so I'm not sure about the scope of a site
check may be or not be, but personally I don't care for the design in
general.
Interesting the comments in relates posts about forward looking,
when the design itself is not.
Holly Bergevin wrote:
From: Dave M G [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://formever.org
IE6 is dead to me now.
If you mean that in the sense that IE6 won't be getting any more bug
fixes to address CSS-related problems, that's fine.
While this is certainly your, and your clients choice not to support
Jasper,
Thank you for responding.
I am new to this list so I'm not sure about the scope of a site
check may be or not be, but personally I don't care for the design in
general.
Can you be more specific about what it is you don't like? I'd be very
interested to hear a negative critique of the
CSS-d,
I've settled on a design that I'm happy with, and I'd like to invite
people to make comments, both technical and artistic.
The site is here:
http://formever.org
As far as technical commentary goes:
It should display correctly in FireFox. I'm using Linux, so I'd be happy
to hear from
Dave M G wrote:
CSS-d,
I've settled on a design that I'm happy with, and I'd like to invite
people to make comments, both technical and artistic.
The site is here:
http://formever.org
FWIW, a level 2 heading is missing.
Ditch the validation buttons?
A little slow loading the image.
You
~davidLaakso wrote:
Dave M G wrote:
CSS-d,
I've settled on a design that I'm happy with, and I'd like to invite
people to make comments, both technical and artistic.
The site is here:
http://formever.org
FWIW, a level 2 heading is missing.
Ditch the validation buttons?
A
http://test.fatpawdesign.com/
Sorry about lack of clarity regarding problem. Above URL links to page with
picture links that show what I mean.
Cheers,
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Peter Hyde-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [css-d] site check please,need help with lower nav
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
http://test.fatpawdesign.com/
Above URL links to page with picture links that show what I mean.
I suggest you add a 'hasLayout' trigger...
#pageheader {height: 100%;}
...but I can't check if that'll make IE7 clear properly.
regards
Georg
--
- Original Message -
From: Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Peter Hyde-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] site check please, picture links added
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
http://test.fatpawdesign.com/
Above URL
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
Ever tempted to put at the begining of the CSS declarations,
*{height: 100%;}
'hasLayout' is not a cure - it's _the_ disease, so I would only try that
in cases where IE works flawless and I'm really, really, bored ;-)
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
Hi,
Please spare a moment and help me with my site tests. I have been
trying to clear floats in the main content. It has worked on all the
browsers listed below except i.e. 5.2-mac.
http://www.3pointdesign.com/
http://www.3pointdesign.com/styles/one.css
Safari 2.0.4
Firefox mozilla 1.5.0.9
http://test.fatpawdesign.com/purm/purm.aminepolyols.html
http://test.fatpawdesign.com/purm/purmbaseformatcss.css
http://test.fatpawdesign.com/purm/purmpagecss.css
In FF and Opera in Win XP; and in FF, Opera, and IE6 in Win2K the
h3.titlerow clears the floated dl#pagenav above it, so the blue
Robert DeLaurentis wrote:
I would appreciate anyone who takes the time to look at my site and
lets me know how its working on their browsers. This is my first all-
CSS site. I tried to use minimal number of classes, ids for major
layouy divs only, and as little non-standard cruft as
Thank you much for the help. It's coming along
Jeff
On 4/5/07, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jeffrey morin wrote:
www.melissagerstein.com/tests/akon/akon.htm
The addition of...
ul#secondaryNav {display: inline;}
...will fix the 'margin doubling on floats' bug in IE6, and make
hi everyone,
i'm not too experienced with 3 column layouts. could you be so kind as to
let me know if this is acceptable. it hasn't been debugged yet but works ok
in ff and ie7. haven't checked anything else yet. thanks
Jeff
www.melissagerstein.com/tests/akon/akon.htm
I would appreciate anyone who takes the time to look at my site and
lets me know how its working on their browsers. This is my first all-
CSS site. I tried to use minimal number of classes, ids for major
layouy divs only, and as little non-standard cruft as possible.
To: CSS
Subject: [css-d] site check
hi everyone,
i'm not too experienced with 3 column layouts. could you be so kind as to
let me know if this is acceptable. it hasn't been debugged yet
but works ok
in ff and ie7. haven't checked anything else yet. thanks
Totally breaks in IE6
jeffrey morin wrote:
www.melissagerstein.com/tests/akon/akon.htm
The addition of...
ul#secondaryNav {display: inline;}
...will fix the 'margin doubling on floats' bug in IE6, and make the
columns line up as intended in that browser.
regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
://www.joeschmittjr.com/css-d/07-03-29_SiteCheckForFormever.org/HomePage-reduced.htm
Hope someone finds it useful.
Joe
- Original Message -
From: Dave M G [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CSS Discuss css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 4:23 AM
Subject: [css-d] Site check
Hi all-
I have finally finished converting our current site from a very messy table
layout to a pure css site, including flyouts. I would appreciate any
feedback on it.
http://www.ism.ws/FinalNewIndex.cfm
Thanks,
Taryn
__
David,
Thank you for responding.
IE6 on Windows xp.
I keep getting pop-up Internet Explorer alerts (five of 'em) saying
Press OK to continue loading the content of this page.
I can't verify that this behavior happens with anyone else.
It has been suggested to me that this might be the
CSS-d,
If any of you out there would be kind enough to tell me if you see any
errors on your browser/platform, that would be really awesome. I've
checked that my design validates.
The design I'd like to test is here:
http://formever.org/css_test
I'm using FireFox on Ubuntu(Linux), and that's
Thanks Peter and to all that responded.I am looking into the css error.
Jeralyn
Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
If any of you out there would be kind enough to tell me if you see any
errors on your browser/platform, that would be really awesome.
List item text is escaping a few characters out the right side of the
Learn More box in FF2/Win. Adding some right padding should fix it.
CSS-d,
Thank you so much to those that have sent me screen shots. And thank you
Kenny for the information about FF on Windows.
As expected, IE6 is having some troubles with the transparent bits of
the PNGs. And a couple of other placement issues.
I've just tried putting in the IE7 Javascript
Hi Dave,
Re: http://formever.org/css_test
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:17:26 +0900, you wrote:
As expected, IE6 is having some troubles with the transparent bits of the
PNGs. And a
couple of other placement issues.
I've just tried putting in the IE7 Javascript patch to make IE6 and IE5
Subject: [css-d] Site check please
I have tested on IE 5.5, 6, and 7...the current versions of Firefox and
Opera. Could someone please test on older browsers and the Mac please?
http://www.servcon.net/new/index.htm
TIA,
Jeralyn
03/28/2007
Jeralyn:
Looks good in Safari and Firefox
I have tested on IE 5.5, 6, and 7...the current versions of Firefox and Opera.
Could someone please test on older browsers and the Mac please?
http://www.servcon.net/new/index.htm
TIA,
Jeralyn
8:00? 8:25?
401 - 500 of 1438 matches
Mail list logo