Hi,
I noise-profiled my newly-purchased Samsung NX1 and am quite happy with the
results it makes.
The resulting file can be found here:
http://www.strobotti.com/derp/dt-noiseprofile-20150501.tar.gz
I hope it helps others as well!
Kind regards,
Juha Jantunen
http://www.strobotti.com
-
On 04/12/15 05:21, Urs Schütz wrote:
> Hi
>
> I did profiling the Olympus E-PL7 noise, following the description
> http://www.darktable.org/2012/12/profiling-sensor-and-photon-noise/
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/e7we55r8ru5p14h/dt-noiseprofile-20150412.tar.gz?dl=0
>
> Thanks for the very nice prog
Hi
I did profiling the Olympus E-PL7 noise, following the description
http://www.darktable.org/2012/12/profiling-sensor-and-photon-noise/
https://www.dropbox.com/s/e7we55r8ru5p14h/dt-noiseprofile-20150412.tar.gz?dl=0
Thanks for the very nice program to all developers.
Urs
Here is noise profile for Sony RX100 Mark3. I've tested it with my images
and the results look reasonable. The benchmark shows higher PSNR for all
ISO values but check the generated charts (I had to generate them as
PostScript not PDF).
https://www.dropbox.com/s/76cyuavtfsiw3cu/dt-noiseprofile-201
[Note: I am now resending this in order to increase the chance of getting
recognized by developers doing noise profile reviews...]
Am Dienstag, 10. Februar 2015, 22:50:10 schrieb Pedro Côrte-Real:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Roland Riegel
wrote:
> > Lately, I have upgraded to a Sony SLT-A
thanks, pushed to master.
your fits are okay, since the bright regions only contain a few pixels in
your image the fit prefers the dark parts of the curve. which means the
profile might leave some more noise in brighter regions, which might not
look disturbing at all. if you're testing the git ver
Hello dear darktable community,
so far, Sony's ILCE-7s doesn't seem to have noise profiles for 1.6.0. I
tried to generate some for the most commonly used ISO values - 100 to 12800
(the AUTO range) as well as 25600 and 51200. The camera supports up to 400k
ISO, but it was hard to generate an image
Would it also be possible to get white balance presets for the olympus omd
em1?
On Oct 24, 2014 12:49 PM, "thokster" wrote:
> hi,
>
>
>
>
> Am 30.09.2014, 19:52 Uhr, schrieb johannes hanika :
>
> hi,
>>
>> yeah, sorry, i really don't get around to doing all the things i'd like to
>> these days..
okay, will switch to the less aggressive one then.
-jo
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 5:47 AM, thokster wrote:
> hi,
>
>
>
>
> Am 30.09.2014, 19:52 Uhr, schrieb johannes hanika :
>
> hi,
>>
>> yeah, sorry, i really don't get around to doing all the things i'd like to
>> these days..
>>
>> all the fit
hi, sorry for the super late reply.. and thanks for profiling. the plots
look good, will push.
-jo
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Rich Renomeron
wrote:
> Here is one of the images I used (ISO 3200):
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_HpnO6hbpJxUzJid082bi1lajQ/edit?usp=sharing
> .
>
> Thanks
Hi,
would it make your life easier if we (anyone reading the list) create
tickets for all submitted profiles, so they don't get forgot so easily?
regards,
Sebastian
On 2014-09-30 19:52, johannes hanika wrote:
> hi,
>
> yeah, sorry, i really don't get around to doing all the things i'd
> like to
Great!
Thx a lot!
I had no problems with the old GX7 profile. I just made another one to see
if get similar results.
I'll try to compare the both.
regards
thouks
Am 30.09.2014, 19:52 Uhr, schrieb johannes hanika :
hi,
yeah, sorry, i really don't get around to doing all the things i'd l
Hi,
By the way I have posted a D40 preset long time ago and didn't hear anything
about it yet ;)
Is the preset okay?
Cheers,
Björn
johannes hanika schrieb:
>--
>Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog
hi,
yeah, sorry, i really don't get around to doing all the things i'd like to
these days..
all the fits look excellent.
gh3: we had that already, but not with as detailed measurements (iso
steps), so i added this one.
gx7: we had an equivalent profile. is there anything wrong with it? values
ar
On 29/09/14 23:54, thokster wrote:
> The last 3 months I tried 3 times to provide noise profiles.
> Up to now there was no reaction.
>
> Am I banned somehow?
> Are the profiles too bad to talk about?
> Do my messages not appear on the list?
Nope. Johannes is just busy, so your noise profiles may
me too
2014-09-30 7:10 GMT+02:00 Colin Adams :
> I can see the message.
>
> On 29 September 2014 23:54, thokster wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> can anybody see this message?
>>
>> The last 3 months I tried 3 times to provide noise profiles.
>> Up to now there was no reaction.
>>
>> Am I banned somehow?
>
I can see the message.
On 29 September 2014 23:54, thokster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can anybody see this message?
>
> The last 3 months I tried 3 times to provide noise profiles.
> Up to now there was no reaction.
>
> Am I banned somehow?
> Are the profiles too bad to talk about?
> Do my messages not a
Hi,
can anybody see this message?
The last 3 months I tried 3 times to provide noise profiles.
Up to now there was no reaction.
Am I banned somehow?
Are the profiles too bad to talk about?
Do my messages not appear on the list?
I wonder whats wrong?
regards
thouks
I generated a second profile.
I think better than the first
https://www.mediafire.com/?mukya81x5phyj3s
C Touzé
--
Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=16059147
... and the third one:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/352146/GM-1/dt-noiseprofile-20140519.tar.gz
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-t
Let me know, if it's usable.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/352146/GX-7/dt-noiseprofile-20140519.tar.gz
thanks
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Stat
Another try.
Hopefully better than the old one
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/352146/GH-3/dt-noiseprofile-20140519.tar.gz
thanks
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI
On 26/06/14 21:43, Erwin Burema wrote:
> Recently got myself a new camera a Canon EOS 700D and to my dismay
> the profile denoise didn't have any profiles for this camera so a quick
> profiling later I got these results:
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20940867/dt-noiseprofile-20140626.tar.
On 24/09/14 15:44, Per Östlund wrote:
> I think this has been overlooked.
Hi Per,
Thanks, Johannes has added your curves, they should now be in git master.
Regards,
Rob
> On 2014-06-27 00:46, Per Östlund wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I made an attempt at generating a noise profile for the Sony Alpha A7.
thanks for the profile! should be pushed now, files look great :)
cheers,
jo
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Per Östlund wrote:
> I think this has been overlooked.
>
> On 2014-06-27 00:46, Per Östlund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I made an attempt at generating a noise profile for the Sony Alpha A
I think this has been overlooked.
On 2014-06-27 00:46, Per Östlund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made an attempt at generating a noise profile for the Sony Alpha A7.
> I tried it out on a couple of my high ISO shots, but couldn't really
> see much difference compared to the general poisson when I adjusted
Hi,
I created a profile by following the instructions on this page:
http://www.darktable.org/2012/12/profiling-sensor-and-photon-noise/
the results look good. the end of the script advises sending the file.
The link for the file :
http://www.mediafire.com/download/19t9divh5bxrxg2/dt-noiseprofile-2
Hi
Since some months I am playing around with darktable master
from git, just a simple user. I love it! Thanks for the
nice work!
Here is my try to give something back: I did a noise
profile for the Olympus E-PL2 from ISO200 - ISO6400.
https://www.dropbox.com/l/db5TfCYYv8xwJoEdUn3wSl??text=1
Be
Hi,
I made an attempt at generating a noise profile for the Sony Alpha A7. I
tried it out on a couple of my high ISO shots, but couldn't really see
much difference compared to the general poisson when I adjusted the
strength to be visually the same. But I'll leave the analysis to you
experts.
Hi,
Recently got myself a new camera a Canon EOS 700D and to my dismay
the profile denoise didn't have any profiles for this camera so a quick
profiling later I got these results:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20940867/dt-noiseprofile-20140626.tar.gz
Hope that these are good enough other
profile looks very good, thanks for submitting!
-jo
2014-05-25 15:07 GMT+12:00 Aurélien PIERRE :
> Hi !
>
> I'm new here. I would like to share my noise profile for Nikon D5300.
>
> All shots have been made focusing to infinity, at f/8, with a
> white-balance manually set on a 18% (neutral) gr
Hi !
I'm new here. I would like to share my noise profile for Nikon D5300.
All shots have been made focusing to infinity, at f/8, with a
white-balance manually set on a 18% (neutral) grey card, between 100 to
25600 ISO.
All files are here :
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/85303452/dt-noisepr
Current git-master works now.
Am 17.05.2014, 14:09 Uhr, schrieb Björn Sonnenschein :
> Hello all,
>
> I am using Darkable, built from git, on my Fedora x64 system and
> profiling images from my Nikon D40 does not work properly.
> When I run the gen-profiles script from the folder where the exp
You are not the only one.
Same here.
Am 17.05.2014, 14:09 Uhr, schrieb Björn Sonnenschein :
> Hello all,
>
> I am using Darkable, built from git, on my Fedora x64 system and
> profiling images from my Nikon D40 does not work properly.
> When I run the gen-profiles script from the folder where t
Hello all,
I am using Darkable, built from git, on my Fedora x64 system and profiling
images from my Nikon D40 does not work properly.
When I run the gen-profiles script from the folder where the exported images
are located, it fails with the following output:
[sun@localhost noise]$ /home/
Here is one of the images I used (ISO 3200):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_HpnO6hbpJxUzJid082bi1lajQ/edit?usp=sharing
.
Thanks,
Rich
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Rich Renomeron wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's an attempt at profiling a Canon SL1/100D. I'm not sure I did it
> right, as the gra
awesome, thanks, these graphs look spot on, will be included in 1.4 :)
cheers,
jo
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Bernhard Kappler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached you'll find a noise profile for the Panasonic DMC-G6.
> The profiling I used the Darktable
> (1:1.4~rc1+120~gee46e3d-0pmjdebruijn1~sauc
yes, noise profiles are uncritical wrt new bugs, it's just new data. so no
problem to put them into the release.
-jo
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Steven Adler wrote:
> Works great! Will this make it in 1.4?
> hey,
>
> thanks for the profiles, these look spot on, i'll push to git.
>
> can y
hey,
thanks for the profiles, these look spot on, i'll push to git.
can you specify more precisely what kind of artifacts you mean? or provide
a test shot so we can take a look? is that related to noise profiling or a
separate issue?
-jo
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:30 PM, steve wrote:
> I gener
I generated a noise profile for the Olympus OM-D E-M1 but it shows
artifacts even at low noise levels. Is it possible that dt isn't
supporting the new RAW format of the E-M1 completely?
What do you think?
http://ubuntuone.com/1ONsmlo3Ktf7tyySfkYQ5G
Steve
---
Am Montag, 7. Oktober 2013, 09:21:32 schrieb Richard Isted - Hotmail:
> Hi all,
Hi.
> Were the noise profile shots I send through last weekend for the Panasonic
> GX7 & GF3 ok or not? I've not heard either way and I've pulled the latest
> updates from GIT but they don't seem to be there.
>
> I
Hi all,
Were the noise profile shots I send through last weekend for the Panasonic GX7
& GF3 ok or not? I've not heard either way and I've pulled the latest updates
from GIT but they don't seem to be there.
I also sent the WB profile for the GX7 at the same time.
Thanks.
Rich.
--
Turning off the highpass filter makes it look better. Setting the hp
filters blend mode to 'color' makes black and white.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4qbrt5byistky8i/img_0001_01.jpg
Thanks
On 17 September 2013 20:43, Pascal Obry wrote:
> Le 17/09/2013 21:40, Roumano a écrit :
> > Remove the hig
Hi,
Remove the high pass module... ( or change the blend mode) (maybe it's was eat
by the style ?)
Regards
Le mardi 17 septembre 2013 à 18:42 +0100, Ben Short a écrit :
> I've tried your style and it produces the following image...
>
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/n7640zo6j7vxfiy/img_0001.jp
Le 17/09/2013 21:40, Roumano a écrit :
> Remove the high pass module... ( or change the blend mode) (maybe it's was
> eat by the style ?)
I would bet for a wrong blend mode. Maybe using "color" blend mode?
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of imag
I've tried your style and it produces the following image...
https://www.dropbox.com/s/n7640zo6j7vxfiy/img_0001.jpg
Somethings not quite right.
On 16 September 2013 23:18, Ger Siemerink wrote:
> Ben,
>
> try attached attached style, which worked for me good as a default.
> I do have a EOS60D
Hi,
In the following folder there is a raw and a jpg created by my Canon 60D.
Can anyone give me some tips on how to apply darktables denoise filters to
the raw to get it looking at good as the jpg?
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/59hxinw37p76g4p/pG3OIO8qD6
Are darktables denoise tools anywhere as go
Ben,
try attached attached style, which worked for me good as a default.
I do have a EOS60D
regards Ger
2013/9/16 Ben Short
> Hi,
>
> In the following folder there is a raw and a jpg created by my Canon 60D.
> Can anyone give me some tips on how to apply darktables denoise filters to
> the r
cool, thanks for that, graphs look good, will push to master.
-jo
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:01 PM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to share my noise-profiles I've just made ...
>
> Best regards
> toalaber
>
>
>
hi, welcome to the list. your profiles look both equally good, i pushed the
normal exposure. maybe there is some secret in-camera raw processing going
on, dark values aren't stabilized quite as well as bright ones, maybe
you'll need some parametric blending with additional tweaks for dark areas
to
First, I'd like to say hello and thank for a great piece of software!
I switched from rawtherapee because it couldnt read properly my underwater pics
with WB adjusted :) Besides I was impressed by the noise profiling and decided
to profile my camera, too. I hope this could help others. I have s
nice lensflare! :)
thanks for the profile, pushed.
it somehow fails to stabilize variance in those very dark regions, i'll
have a look if that is due to this particular camera or if there is
something structural going on.
cheers,
jo
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:58 PM, TCJ wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
Hi,
I created a noise profile for my Sony SLT-A99V.
The raw import in the current version of darktable seems to be not correct.
Thatswhy I used a patched version of
"src/external/LibRaw/internal/dcraw_common.cpp" where I added
{ "SONY SLT-A99", 128, 0,
{ 6344,-1612,-462,-4863,12477
Here is a profile for the Panasonic GH-3
Hopefully it looks good.
regards
thorsten
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/352146/dt-noiseprofile-20130510.tar.gz
--
AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform deli
Here is a profile for the Panasonic GH-3
Hopefully it looks good.
regards
thorsten
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/352146/dt-noiseprofile-20130510.tar.gz
--
AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform del
* johannes hanika [2013-05-04 08:38] :
> sorry, but these curves don't match the data (probably something about
> exposure, too dark i would say). see the attached image. the flat green
> line should actually follow the noisy green curve very closely.
>
> -jo
My apologies for the bad samples
cool, thanks. numbers are very close to your last version, maybe the
gaussian part (sensor heat etc) is a little different now.
commited,
jo
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Baptiste Pierrat wrote:
> Correction: commas instead of tabs in the presets.txt file.
>
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:08
sorry, but these curves don't match the data (probably something about
exposure, too dark i would say). see the attached image. the flat green
line should actually follow the noisy green curve very closely.
-jo
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Stefan Wimmer wrote:
> > I tried to create denois
cool, thanks for that, committed. sorry for the delay..
j.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Wolfgang Renz wrote:
> hi,
>
> I tried to denoise some more real life pictures with the presets I sent
> before.
> Since I wasn't completely satiesfied I repeated the profiling procedure.
>
> According t
Correction: commas instead of tabs in the presets.txt file.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Baptiste Pierrat <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had previously sent a noise profile for Sony SLT A57. However it appears
> that I did it wrong (I applied the raw linear style and exp
Hello,
I had previously sent a noise profile for Sony SLT A57. However it appears
that I did it wrong (I applied the raw linear style and exported to TIF
instead of directly using the script on the raw files) and the results were
so-so.
So I did it again correctly this time and averaged 4 results,
As I got no response, I'm sending this once again.
Here are noise profiling files for three cameras I'm using: Olympus E-1,
Olympus E-3 and Olympus EP-2:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6jPA_Ww7jjcTVM3eEFuS0h3S1E/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6jPA_Ww7jjcR0puOVBwbkc0ZWc/edit?us
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Virtual Fantasy wrote:
> First, the data doesn't look right, why are they all zeros?
>
I thought this was just a way of displaying coeff. which are small. The
line in presets
looks typically like this:
{"E-1 iso 100", "OLYMPUS CORPORATION", "E-1",
awesome, thanks for profiling, pushed to master :)
-jo
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Baptiste Pierrat <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> I have successfully profiled my camera using the tools and method
> described in the blog. You will find the results
> here:
>
> https://d
Hi guys!
I have successfully profiled my camera using the tools and method described
in the blog. You will find the results
here:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6APWwFDfvCnamM4SFcyYTVwOGM/edit?usp=sharing
I've tested it on several pictures and also did a few benchmarks; it
effectively increased
Here are noise profiling files for three cameras I'm using: Olympus E-1,
Olympus E-3 and Olympus EP-2:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6jPA_Ww7jjcTVM3eEFuS0h3S1E/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6jPA_Ww7jjcR0puOVBwbkc0ZWc/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6jPA_Ww7j
> I tried to create denoise profiles for my new Nikon D7100 and the results
> can be downloaded here:
>
> http://swimmer.home.xs4all.nl/diverse/dt-noiseprofile-20130408.tar.gz
>
> Please let me know whether the presets are reasonable otherwise I'll give it
> another try.
Hi again,
I w
graphs look spot on. pushed, thanks :)
-jo
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Stefan Wimmer wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> since my direct email is still hanging for approval I'll give it another
> try
> via Gmane ... ;-)
>
> I tried to create denoise profiles for my new Nikon D7100 and the results
>
Hello again,
since my direct email is still hanging for approval I'll give it another try
via Gmane ... ;-)
I tried to create denoise profiles for my new Nikon D7100 and the results
can be downloaded here:
http://swimmer.home.xs4all.nl/diverse/dt-noiseprofile-20130408.tar.gz
Please let me
hey,
i think something is wrong lately with hdr construction or something else
on the way in the benchmark script.. your plots look just fine and the flat
noise variances are perfect. i'll push to git master.
thanks for measuring that data :)
-jo
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Wolfgang Renz wr
Thank you for your work.
After a git pull, the K-5 IIs noise profile is available :-)
Cheers,
Michael
Am 23.03.2013 14:17, schrieb johannes hanika:
> cool, thanks. those plots look great, pushed.
>
> the error message is not to worry, just used to generate more helpful
> user feedback.
>
> che
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:17 PM, johannes hanika wrote:
> cool, thanks. those plots look great, pushed.
>
> the error message is not to worry, just used to generate more helpful
> user feedback.
That profile can probably be duplicated for the non s version btw...
Regards,
Pascal de Bruijn
-
cool, thanks. those plots look great, pushed.
the error message is not to worry, just used to generate more helpful
user feedback.
cheers,
jo
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Michael Born wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the data is here:
> http://rapidshare.com/files/3186686894/dt-noiseprofile-20130323.t
Hi all,
the data is here:
http://rapidshare.com/files/3186686894/dt-noiseprofile-20130323.tar.gz
Please tell me if something is not ok with the data.
Cheers,
Michael
PS: I used the git version of today and got the following error message
from the gen-profile script.
...
===> Prepare final tarb
Am 23.03.2013 08:54, schrieb Pascal Obry:
>
> Michael,
>
>> Sorry, I hope this time it works.
>> http://rapidshare.com/files/730495913/IMGP3276.PEF
>> http://rapidshare.com/files/3682942706/IMGP3137.DNG
>
> Ok reproduced and now fixed. Will be part of 1.2-rc2 I suppose.
>
Thank you very much.
Michael,
> Sorry, I hope this time it works.
> http://rapidshare.com/files/730495913/IMGP3276.PEF
> http://rapidshare.com/files/3682942706/IMGP3137.DNG
Ok reproduced and now fixed. Will be part of 1.2-rc2 I suppose.
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by mea
Am 22.03.2013 17:30, schrieb Pascal Obry:
>
> Michael,
>
>> The K200D can save PEF or DNG raw files. Here are test files:
>> http://rapidshare.com/files/3682942706/IMGP3137.DNG
>> http://rapidshare.com/files/730495913/IMGP3276.PEF
>
> I don't have permissions to download those files.
>
Sorry, I
Michael,
> The K200D can save PEF or DNG raw files. Here are test files:
> http://rapidshare.com/files/3682942706/IMGP3137.DNG
> http://rapidshare.com/files/730495913/IMGP3276.PEF
I don't have permissions to download those files.
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to tr
Hi Pascal.
Am 21.03.2013 22:30, schrieb Pascal Obry:
>
> Michael,
>
>> >From the metadata panel of the LT (without the ""):
>> model "PENTAX K-5 II s"
>> maker "PENTAX"
>
> This one is not on the database. There is the "PENTAX K-5" and probably
> this profile was wrongly used I suppose as the m
On 13-03-21 02:30 PM, Pascal Obry wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
>> >From the metadata panel of the LT (without the ""):
>> model "PENTAX K-5 II s"
>> maker "PENTAX"
>
> This one is not on the database. There is the "PENTAX K-5" and probably
> this profile was wrongly used I suppose as the model must be an
Michael,
>>From the metadata panel of the LT (without the ""):
> model "PENTAX K-5 II s"
> maker "PENTAX"
This one is not on the database. There is the "PENTAX K-5" and probably
this profile was wrongly used I suppose as the model must be an exact
match now.
> and
>
> model "PENTAX K200D"
> ma
Am 21.03.2013 21:52, schrieb Pascal Obry:
>
> Michael,
>
>> I'm sure there were profiles for both cameras in DT.
>
> Ok, so what is the exact model name and camera maker displayed in dt for
> those cameras?
>
>From the metadata panel of the LT (without the ""):
model "PENTAX K-5 II s"
maker "P
Michael,
> I'm sure there were profiles for both cameras in DT.
Ok, so what is the exact model name and camera maker displayed in dt for
those cameras?
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of imagination
http://v2p.fr.eu.org
http://www.obry.net
Hi Pascal,
I'm sure there were profiles for both cameras in DT.
Michael
Am 21.03.2013 21:38, schrieb Pascal Obry:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
>> The current git pull shows me available noise profiles for PENTAX K-5
>> and NIKON D5100 pictures.
>> No profiles are listed for PENTAX K200D and PENTAX K-5IIs
Hi Michael,
> The current git pull shows me available noise profiles for PENTAX K-5
> and NIKON D5100 pictures.
> No profiles are listed for PENTAX K200D and PENTAX K-5IIs pictures (just
> generic poissonian).
Maybe they are not in the database, I haven't looked. But anyway I have
fixed the issu
Am 21.03.2013 20:14, schrieb Pascal Obry:
>
> Is it me or the profile are not found anymore?
>
> For my D800 and D300 picture I do not see the body in the profile combo
> anymore.
>
> Pascal.
>
Hi Pascal.
The current git pull shows me available noise profiles for PENTAX K-5
and NIKON D5100 pi
Is it me or the profile are not found anymore?
For my D800 and D300 picture I do not see the body in the profile combo
anymore.
Pascal.
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of imagination
http://v2p.fr.eu.org
http://www.obry.net
gpg --keyserv
it's not the latest version of dt :) please let me know if an updated
git master works..
-jo
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Dimitri Gathy wrote:
> With the last version of dt(1.1+1165~g11a3979), the eos5Dc eos5D2 profiles
> appear & work fine but i have no profiles under 2500 iso for my eos5D2
With the last version of dt(1.1+1165~g11a3979), the eos5Dc eos5D2 profiles
appear & work fine but i have no profiles under 2500 iso for my eos5D2
which work fine before, when the eos 5Dc doesn't work.
the dt-noiseprofile.tar.gz, the library.db are here:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/uez42hf74x22sur/dZ
hey,
your graphs look just fine. i would guess you ran into a bug in the
script we fixed recently. this would produce the right graphs +
presets.txt but mess up the preset insertion into the database (so you
would always get black images when testing with that).
thanks for profiling!
cheers,
jo
works perfect.
Thanks a lot for the excellent work!!
J
Am 25.02.2013 07:51, schrieb johannes hanika:
hey,
thanks for profiling, the graphs look very good (will push in a minute).
turns out the script was terribly broken wrt testing those things as
presets. should be fixed now.
cheers,
jo
I try to profile my 5D2 & 5Dc. I succeed with the 5D2 but the 5Dc profile
doesn't work. I have only one profile 'generic poissonian' and when i
choose the preset corresponding to the iso, the image turns black!
I put the dt-noiseprofile.tar.gz, the library.db & the terminal verbose
here:
https://ww
hey,
thanks for profiling, the graphs look very good (will push in a minute).
turns out the script was terribly broken wrt testing those things as
presets. should be fixed now.
cheers,
jo
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:01 AM, JB wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> did the profiling for the Canon G12 and Nikon D7
Hi all,
did the profiling for the Canon G12 and Nikon D700:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/z86sf98yb9n1d1t/GSVStBr-EB/dt-np
Do these look good?
I'm not certain about the result. After a few iterations of trial and
error there are no more errors while running the gen-profile script.
But when applyin
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Wolfgang Goetz wrote:
> johannes hanika wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Wolfgang Goetz
>> wrote:
> ...
>> > noise source is CMOS + DAC ...same hardware with or without the 'E'
>>
>> and the photons themselves.
>
> ;-) good to know that this little b
johannes hanika wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Wolfgang Goetz
> wrote:
...
> > noise source is CMOS + DAC ...same hardware with or without the 'E'
>
> and the photons themselves.
;-) good to know that this little beasts don't look at their target.
>
> > to prove evidence:
> > whe
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Wolfgang Goetz wrote:
> johannes hanika wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Wolfgang Goetz
>> wrote:
>
> Hi Johannes,
>
>> > noiseprofiles.h: // Module: denoise (profiled)
>> > D800E: duplication of the D800 settings.
>>
>> you sure that's a good idea?
johannes hanika wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Wolfgang Goetz
> wrote:
Hi Johannes,
> > noiseprofiles.h: // Module: denoise (profiled)
> > D800E: duplication of the D800 settings.
>
> you sure that's a good idea? doesn't the E version come without the
> lowpass filter and would thu
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Wolfgang Goetz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> changes for git version:
>
> noiseprofiles.h: // Module: denoise (profiled)
> D800E: duplication of the D800 settings.
you sure that's a good idea? doesn't the E version come without the
lowpass filter and would thus be expected
Hello,
changes for git version:
noiseprofiles.h: // Module: denoise (profiled)
D800E: duplication of the D800 settings.
exif.cc: // error in export: GPSLongitude 0 deg 0' 0.00" E
returning length of blob and header, second version
attached:
git diff > d800-noise-exif.txt
kind regards
Wolf
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
