On Wed, May 9, 2018, at 12:46, kneops wrote:
> I don't know how to describe this otherwise, but in this case I had a
> folder with lots of skulls so I wanted to delete them. Normally I do
> ctrl-click on the first image in a row, then shift-click on the last
> image in that row, and then
On Tue, May 8, 2018, at 04:35, Anton Aylward wrote:
> On 07/05/18 07:10 PM, junkyardspar...@yepmail.net wrote:
> > whereas exFAT currently *does* present some obstacle
>
> And what obstacle is that?
Just in the practical sense that it has resulted in two (IIRC) different people
posting here
On Mon, May 7, 2018, at 17:12, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * junkyardspar...@yepmail.net [05-07-18 19:13]:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 7, 2018, at 15:46, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > * junkyardspar...@yepmail.net [05-07-18
> > > 18:05]:
>
On Mon, May 7, 2018, at 15:46, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * junkyardspar...@yepmail.net [05-07-18 18:05]:
> > On Mon, May 7, 2018, at 14:12, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> >
> > > yes, afaik dt uses the systems disk access. I believe dt uses gphoto2 to
> > > access the
On Mon, May 7, 2018, at 14:12, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> yes, afaik dt uses the systems disk access. I believe dt uses gphoto2 to
> access the camera and the camera contained card(s).
I'm just curious: is this still needed for file access on anything but very old
cameras? I've always used
On Fri, May 4, 2018, at 06:10, Dave Pawson wrote:
> Thanks Bernhard, I've emailed dcoffin a couple of times offering files.
> no response at all!
It's possible that dcraw is no longer actively maintained, based on similar
reports.
>Is that the way into adding a new profile to DT? via DC
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, at 11:40, kneops wrote:
> You know that song 'Too many puppies' by Primus? I was confused about
> how to simply rotate an image in darkroom so I asked a question about it
> just a few minutes ago. This has been explained to me. There is a
> seperate Orientation panel next
There *is* a darkroom module for this.
https://www.darktable.org/usermanual/en/modules.html#orientation
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, at 11:01, kneops wrote:
> I was looking for a way to simply rotate an image 90 degrees. It seems
> only to be possible in the ligttable window which I find strange.
GX9 is listed as one of the newly supported cameras in 2.4.3 release
announcement:
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/releases/tag/release-2.4.3
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, at 06:59, Dave Pawson wrote:
> in the UK.
> New Panasonic GX9 camera, not supported by darktable (tbc?)
>
> Willing
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018, at 10:44, Frank J. wrote:
> Pointing DT to the mount point is only possible with "import folder".
> This will leave the fotos on the card and write the moint-point-path to
> the database and write sidecars on the card.
Ah, good point. I never use darktable to access a
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018, at 00:34, Frank J. wrote:
> Hallo,
> is the exFAT-Filesystem supported by darktable?
>
> In the past I used SD-Cards up to 16 GB which are formatted whith a
> FAT-filesystem. My new card is a SDXC-card with 64 GB space. My camera
> (Olympus) formatted the card with an
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, at 22:46, Remco Viëtor wrote:
> Yes, /usr/local/lib is the usual place for locally installed libraries.
> /usr/lib64 is supposed to hold the libraries installed by your distribution.
> And at least on my system, /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/lib64 are searched
> by
>
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, at 18:45, André Felipe Carvalho wrote:
> I think I need to symlink the library to someplace dt expects. But... why
> does it find the library at compilation time, but not when executing?
Are you sure /usr/local/lib is the right place to be installing on your system,
as
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, at 03:25, Bernhard wrote:
>
> Recently I added Geeqie to my workflow to sort and reduce the number of
> photos to process in dt in "mass shootings" (sports, birds in motion
> etc.) - that helped a lot in reducing e.g. from 500 to 50 photos at the
> end of a session - I
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018, at 09:19, Matej Martinovic wrote:
> It's the distance from the sensor plane of your camera to the subject
> which is in focus. You can see the set focus distance also on the
> distance scale on your lens.
Note that depending on the camera model, this may or may not
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018, at 11:44, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 25. Januar 2018, 20:33:04 CET schrieb Michael Staats:
> > Note: My images are located on a NAS, mounted via nfs v3, but my home
> > dir (i. e. including .config/darktable/*db) lives on a local SSD. I have
> > disable
On Mon, Jan 1, 2018, at 21:27, Frank wrote:
>
> There is no checksum that I could see from this URL. Have I missed it
> somewhere?
The checksum (".asc") files are listed alongside the packages here:
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/releases/
> I had initially thought it might
I find that with the haze removal module enabled, scrolling the temperature
slider in the white balance module produces strange alternating jumps in what
seems to be the area of effect of the former module. Can anyone else confirm
this?
--
jys
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017, at 02:02, Tobias
I can't reproduce this in darktable with lensfun 3.2, so if it is a lensfun
bug, it was probably fixed since lensfun 2.8.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017, at 12:25, Аl Воgnеr wrote:
> Am Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:30:15 +0100
> schrieb Аl Воgnеr :
>
> > Should the Pentax K-1 be
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017, at 11:42, Ulrich Pegelow wrote:
> There is a feature as you suggested in the upcoming 2.4.0. When holding
> down the CTRL key while entering one of the parametric masks sliders you
> see the mask preview as long as you stay in the slider. On leaving the
> view goes back
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017, at 13:53, Brune Wayce wrote:
> Hello,
> I am on Debian 9 (stable) and my camera/lens was not present in the lensfun
> database seen by darktable.
> After some troubles, in the end I did succeed updating the lensfun
> database: I did have to install all the *lensfun*
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017, at 09:59, darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
> DT 2.2.5 on arch.
>
> I was processing an image and I just took a snapshot:
>
> https://i.imgur.com/tUD86t7.png
>
> * cleared the snapshot
> * returned to the lighttable and the preview was totally black.
>
> * pressed D to
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017, at 22:29, Lorenzo Bolzani wrote:
> I'm quite sure that all processing is applied before downscale (this has
> been discussed before). And sharpening is mostly lost after downscale.
This depends on whether "do high quality resampling during export" is checked
in "core
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017, at 13:33, Аl Воgnеr wrote:
> Am Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:28:10 -0700
> schrieb junkyardspar...@yepmail.net:
>>
> > It's not usual to add a compact camera without lens data now, I'm not
> > sure if the intention was to map it to the lens data for the G9,
> > since it appears to use
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017, at 08:06, Аl Воgnеr wrote:
> Am Fri, 27 Oct 2017 15:54:05 +0300
> schrieb Roman Lebedev :
>
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Аl Воgnеr
> > wrote:
> > > darktable 1:2.2.5-0pmjdebruijn1~xenial
> > >
> > >
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017, at 16:08, Roman Lebedev wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 2:05 AM, David Vincent-Jones
> wrote:
> > My lens is included in the current lensfun coverage but does not display
> > in the dt listing ... do I just wait for dt to update to the latest
> >
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017, at 09:34, David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> Norman ... thanks for that, I was assuming that the 'arrow thing' would
> open the list as is a normal case. so, problem solved, thanks
>
> I guess that eventually my camera and lens will be added to the list!!
See
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017, at 23:18, David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> darktable 2.3.0~git975.117e1358c-298.4
> Camera Fujifilm X-Pro2 with XF23mmF2 WR
>
> My lens is correctly shown but the module indicates that
> "camera/lens not found-please select manually"
>
> There is no drop-down list available and
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017, at 13:44, Аl Воgnеr wrote:
> Maybe someone is interested how to use the Pentax KP with Ubuntu 16.04.
> I discussed this with Thorsten Bronger from lensfun privately and
> finally this worked in an own file.
>
>
>
> Ricoh Imaging Company, Ltd.
> Pentax
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017, at 04:37, Remco Viëtor wrote:
> On samedi 30 septembre 2017 12:18:00 CEST junkyardspar...@yepmail.net wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017, at 02:17, Roman Lebedev wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 1:48 AM, wrote:
> > > > Remove the DOCTYPE
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017, at 02:17, Roman Lebedev wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 1:48 AM, wrote:
> >
> > Remove the DOCTYPE declaration on the first line
> >
> >
> >
> > and change the version to "1" in the line that follows
> >
> >
> You do realize that changing
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017, at 07:05, darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
>
> I needed to add some Fuji lenses. I checked:
>
> https://www.mankier.com/1/lensfun-update-data
>
> [froggy@dodoite ~]$ sudo lensfun-update-data
> [sudo] password for froggy:
> Reading
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017, at 20:47, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * junkyardspar...@yepmail.net [09-27-17 23:27]:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017, at 19:15, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > * junkyardspar...@yepmail.net [09-27-17
> > > 21:36]:
>
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017, at 19:15, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * junkyardspar...@yepmail.net [09-27-17 21:36]:
> > The actual official lensfun source code repository is still the sourceforge
> > one. However, most of the additions to the *database* happen in a separate
The actual official lensfun source code repository is still the sourceforge
one. However, most of the additions to the *database* happen in a separate
repository at github; there is a daily update list available here:
http://wilson.bronger.org/lensfun_coverage.html
Unfortunately, adding new
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017, at 10:27, Brune Wayce wrote:
> 2017-09-03 18:05 GMT+02:00 Remco Viëtor :
>
> > Time needed for real time edition depends on which modules you have
> > enabled.
> > Most of the basic ones are simple enough, so you won't see much difference
> >
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017, at 07:52, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Samstag, 2. September 2017, 20:30:53 CEST schrieb
> junkyardspar...@yepmail.net:
> > On Sat, Sep 2, 2017, at 01:50, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, 1. September 2017, 17:47:02 CEST schrieb
> > >
> > >
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017, at 01:50, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Freitag, 1. September 2017, 17:47:02 CEST schrieb
> junkyardspar...@yepmail.net:
> > Ah, nevermind, I finally noticed:
> >
> > "This documentation is for the *developement* version of darktable. for the
> > stable version, please
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017, at 01:38, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> local dt = require "darktable"
> dt.register_event("intermediate-export-image",
> function (event, filename, format, storage)
> os.execute("echo 'TODO: do something to " .. filename .. "'")
> end
> )
Is this why I haven't been
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017, at 08:57, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 24. August 2017, 08:29:31 CEST schrieb
> junkyardspar...@yepmail.net:
> > I've been using a Lua script to fill the lens and focal length fields in
> > darktable for images taken with old manual lenses. It works fine within
I've been using a Lua script to fill the lens and focal length fields in
darktable for images taken with old manual lenses. It works fine within
darktable, allowing for detection by module presets and selection of lens
correction profiles. I just noticed, however, that the information doesn't
Try grabbing the little square that appears in the upper-left thumbnail image,
and dragging it around. :)
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017, at 17:30, Paul Deverson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have, what is in all likelihood, a really dumb question!
>
> In Darkroom view, I know how to zoom in and out using the
4Gb is a pretty big cache... are yousure you aren't hitting swap when trying to
load it into memory?
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017, at 08:34, Albert Castells wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> is it me or lightable is slow when recovering thumbnails?
>
> I mean, when I import a folder, I understand that
On Mon, May 29, 2017, at 14:26, Аl Воgnеr wrote:
> Am Mon, 29 May 2017 13:46:18 -0700
>
> In the meantime I know, why 0.3.2 didn't work sometimes, I use
> different cameras and one was the new Pentax KP, which is not supported
> until now. When I assigned a Pentax K3 instead, it worked
Lens database updates happen here first:
https://github.com/lensfun/lensfun/tree/master/data/db
On May 26, 2017 3:20:39 PM PDT, "Аl Воgnеr" wrote:
>I found out, that the newest list at
>http://wilson.bronger.org/lensfun_coverage.html contains my lens,
>release 0.3.2
On Fri, May 26, 2017, at 02:53, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> So my lensfun is 0.2.8. Where do I find the 0.3.2 version? I (naïvely)
> supposed it was the most recent one...
The 0.3.x source releases have been out for more than 2 years:
http://lensfun.sourceforge.net/
You would have to ask your
Your file auto-selected correctly for me with the profile I attached using
darktable 2.2.4 and lensfun 0.3.2... what versions are you using?
--
jys
On Thu, May 25, 2017, at 10:34, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> I tried with your file, still no go.
>
> The camera is detected in the lens, but the
The variants apparently don't work, see:
https://github.com/lensfun/lensfun/commit/a48bc3afb87d72b48f176890e080a0b094d31b01#diff-50e22dbf0edf411c0bec00e9df83a7ae
But they shouldn't be needed in this case anyway.
Otherwise, not sure why that wouldn't work.
On Sat, May 20, 2017, at 12:24,
On Sun, May 14, 2017, at 10:31, Andy wrote:
> Is there a way to apply the clipping threshold to many images at once?
> Or is there a better way to automatically expose many images so that the
> colors span the whole range of the histogram?
You might find the automatic mode on the levels
This also happens to me, randomly, seems to be harmless. Sometimes scrolling
down then up causes everything to "reshuffle" back to starting from the first
"slot".
On Sun, May 7, 2017, at 11:10, darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
> DT 2.2.4 on arch
>
> When I had a single image it was on the top
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017, at 06:03, Remco Viëtor wrote:
> But, while the *camera* has been added to the Lensfun database, but *lens*
> correction data
> aren't available (so far). You might try using the profiles for the Canon g7x
> ('Mk I').
Indeed, the camera has the same lens as the "Mark
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017, at 00:31, johannes hanika wrote:
> that's averaging. for star trails/light painting maybe you'd want the
> brightest pixel (and for removal of stuff median etc).
Yes, a few times I've abused this averaging in cases where it wasn't really the
optimal approach, but just
Did you try the "create HDR" function in darktable? It sometimes works well for
this kind of thing, depending on exactly how much light fell where in each shot
and the overlap...
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017, at 21:57, darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
> DT 2.2.3 on arch.
>
> I took photos of a car
Oops, I forgot that darktable won't load lensfun database files with a
'version="2"' parameter... sorry. Attached is a stripped down entry for just
the X-Pro2 you can use instead. Don't forget to restore your system
mil-fujifilm.xml file to original. :)
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017, at 18:06,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017, at 09:20, Stéphane Gourichon wrote:
> * Darktable basecurve fusion always considers only one image at a time.
> Never "two frames", several input files (be it bracketed exposure,
> flash/no flash, etc.).
You can, however, use darktable's "create hdr" function to
It is indeed in the database, profiled on the crop sensor it was designed for:
https://github.com/lensfun/lensfun/commit/f8a89e2e582f078aa3b665b6888a006d149d
Beyond that, this discussion is getting pretty far off-topic for this list.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017, at 18:23, Michael wrote:
> has
I created profiles for the E-PL6 and E-PL7, which turned out almost exactly
similar. Since they both use the same sensor as the E-M5mkII, you may want to
give them a try:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/b8hgqit9n8xk8y2/AABWtUI1fIbrGyfj43tZyH6Fa?dl=0
There's also a base curve based on the default
If you are converting to monochrome with the CLUT module, nothing after that
module in the pipeline (i.e. displayed higher in the modules listing) will have
color information to work with; they will all be seeing the monochrome output.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017, at 09:37, darkta...@911networks.com
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017, at 23:10, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> For sure, if you want a real HDR image you'll need several bracketed
> images, but then you'll have to use an external tool if you want
> the equivalent of the basecurve exposure fusion.
You could certainly use the "create HDR" function
I just now went into settings > shortcuts to see if I could bind a keyboard
input to the "auto" button in the levels module. There wasn't any such binding,
but there *was* a subsection for "fusion", which, as far as I know, only exists
in the base curve module. Looking in the base curve module
Sounds like this:
https://www.mail-archive.com/darktable-user@lists.darktable.org/msg00659.html
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017, at 21:45, Mark Patey wrote:
> Hi, everyone-
>
> I've mostly used darktable on Ubuntu up until now, but have recently
> purchased a 2015 MacBook Pro, and am currently using dt
Known issue. Check out the section on Input Color Profile here:
http://www.darktable.org/usermanual/ch03s04s03.html.php
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017, at 21:31, Mark Patey wrote:
> Hi, all-
>
> I'm experiencing an odd issue with my Fuji X-T10 RAF files in darktable.
> When I enable the Levels module,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017, at 14:11, Guillermo Rozas wrote:
> Try increasing the opencl_memory_headroom parameter as mentioned by
> Matthias before. It worked for my 960M for those particular images.
Thanks, I will, if I ever need to for my actual use case. Other than an
occasional stitched
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017, at 00:26, Matthieu Moy wrote:
>
> GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a 140 $ card, so not a high-end one but not a crappy
> one either, and it's 50 % slower than a core i7 for these images.
Those benchmark totals don't give a very meaningful overview by themselves. I
just installed
Well, trying to white balance concert lighting seems like it might be a
potentially futile task, but... what I would do is use a different module,
maybe "color correction", to produce the offset from white that you want, then
apply that same setting to all the pictures that you white balance
You can load the jpeg file as if it were an XMP file using "load sidecar file"
in the history module in lighttable view (you may have to change the filter in
the file selection dialog to show all files).
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016, at 15:55, Niccolò Belli wrote:
> Hi,
> I just lost one hour+ of
Are you able to select it manually from the menu? If so, then run exiv2 on a
file taken with that lens and see if the name matches what's in the model field
in the profile. If it doesn't, try changing the field to whatever name it uses.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016, at 19:38, Francisco Cribari wrote:
>
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016, at 03:52, Roman Lebedev wrote:
> Please try adding 2 following lines:
> fprintf(stderr, "%s roi in %d %d %d %d\n", self->name(), roi_in->x,
> roi_in->y, roi_in->width, roi_in->height);
> fprintf(stderr, "%s roi out %d %d %d %d\n", self->name(), roi_out->x,
> roi_out->y,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016, at 13:55, Roman Lebedev wrote:
> Hm, so the speed decrease is for the full pipe, which is for main darkroom
> view.
> I expected to see a problem in preview pipe.
>
> How did you get darktable?
Built on Slackware64 14.2, with the same build options I've been using for
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016, at 06:23, Roman Lebedev wrote:
> I would make a educated guess that at some point the darkroom caches,
> which usually are there and make darkroom fast, are invalidated for
> valid reasons, so darktable has to re-run the whole pipe, and not just
> one module.
> And as you
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016, at 01:40, Roman Lebedev wrote:
> I doubt that is a bug. Especially profiled denoise is quite CPU-hungry.
Thanks. I'm well aware that the denoise is computationally expensive (and
rarely have it enabled while editing). What I don't understand is why,
occasionally, the
Thanks for splitting the preset storage out from the image db, very happy to
see that, and the modifier keys on the sliders is a nice UI enhancement... if I
can retrain myself to use them!
I've encountered one odd behavior, but can't quite seem to nail down exact
steps to reproduce: when
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016, at 08:15, Jean-Luc CECCOLI wrote:
> At this time, I realized that I had left the parmeter set to overwrite
> instead of merge (or stack, I don't remember the english parameter).
On the occasions when I use "overwrite" mode, I try to remember to set it back
to "append"
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016, at 01:09, Jason Polak wrote:
> Interesting problem. I would of thought it possible to at least draw the
> masks for the spot removal module and save it as a preset, but I just
> tried it and it's not possible to save drawn masks as a preset, most
> likely because it
Do you perhaps have the history stack module set to "overwrite" instead of
"append"? This happens to me if I don't remember to change it back immediately
after the rare occasions that I use "overwrite" mode...
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016, at 10:40, François Guinot wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have 2
Besides the default curve, I would also apply any desired white balance,
denoise, and lens correction (or chromatic aberrations module) to the RAW files
before exporting, since those work better on linear data, I believe.
--
jys
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016, at 19:20, I. Ivanov wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
The following links give some insight into how a lighting-independent (within
reason) color profile is prepared:
http://ninedegreesbelow.com/photography/camera-profile-make-target-shot.html
http://ninedegreesbelow.com/photography/well-behaved-camera-profile.html
--
jys
On Wed, Aug 17,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016, at 16:00, David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> The 'recently used' list has a limited length so that entries that were
> older get automatically removed.
>
> One can also hit the 'reset' button and all but the current setting will
> be removed.
You can also just delete the ones
78 matches
Mail list logo