[deal.II] Re: Apply Neumann Boundary condition

You should test your code step by step, figuring out exactly where the error occurs. And then propose a technical and accurate question here. Time is expensive, and the developers offer their kind help to us, then we should respect their time and help. 在 2016年12月2日星期五

[deal.II] Re: Apply Neumann Boundary condition

Dear Jean, I know that this website is not the code reviewer. I want to apply Neumann boundary condition on the curved side of my domain. It should be note that the domain is symmetry. I have considered half of a circle. It would be very kind of you if you let me know whether it is applied

[dealii-developers] Promoting developer version documentation in search engines and user forum posts

Dear all, When I answer posts on the forum I try my best to add links to relevant portions of the documentation. I tend to choose (when I remember to do so) those from the developer page because I anticipate that these links would exist in perpetuity as we move to version 9 and beyond. As

Re: [deal.II] Re: mesh quality during deformations using MappingQEulerian

Hi Tom, > J-P, you (and the entire dealii community) are a paragon of encouragement, >> and I appreciate that very much. >> > Thank you, your kind words do mean a lot! > here's what I came up with yesterday > That's a handy piece of code to keep around. Thanks for sharing it! This works

[deal.II] Re: Apply Neumann Boundary condition

Dear Benhour, As I explained to someone else the day before yesterday, the point of this forum is not to provide a code review service without you having done due diligence on your

[deal.II] Apply Neumann Boundary condition

Dear All, I want to apply non-zero neumann boundary condition on the curved domain of half of the circle. The way that I define my geometry, the boundary id and apply the Neumann B.C is written as follow: *Defining boundary id for different sections of domain (half_hyper_ball):* const

[deal.II] Re: Trouble building dealii with p4est - undeclared variables in scope

Chris, On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 10:56:13 AM UTC-5, Chris Coutinho wrote: > > With only p4est enabled, and P4EST_DIR pointing to the DEBUG folder of > version 0.3.4.1, I get the following errors associated with undeclared > variables in scope. The rest of the output can be found in the

[deal.II] Trouble building dealii with p4est - undeclared variables in scope

Hello deal.ii users, I'm having trouble building dealii 8.4.2 with p4est support on OpenSUSE Leap 42.2, kernel 4.4.27-2-default, gcc/g++/gfortran version 4.8.5, openmpi 1.10.3 (MPI 3.0) I have successfully built deal.ii with MPI, PETSC, and METIS support and ran a few examples without a

Re: [deal.II] Wall time vs number of cores for MPI run

I wrote a code using deal.II. Now, I want to compare effect of the number of cores on the simulation time. The code is developed based on step-42 from deal.II tutorial. The code is executed in Ubuntu 14.04, Intel core i5 and 4GB ram as, mpirun –n ./code parameter_file.prm The obtained

[deal.II] Wall time vs number of cores for MPI run

Dear all I wrote a code using deal.II. Now, I want to compare effect of the number of cores on the simulation time. The code is developed based on step-42 from deal.II tutorial. The code is executed in Ubuntu 14.04, Intel core i5 and 4GB ram as, mpirun –n ./code parameter_file.prm

Re: [deal.II] Re: deal.ii and Reduced Basis method

Dear Jean-Paul and Wolfgang, thanks a lot for your replies! We contacted the developers of pyMOR who will help us to solve the RB problem, using deal.ii as an external software. Kind regards, Giulia Il giorno giovedì 1 dicembre 2016 13:07:58 UTC+1, Wolfgang Bangerth ha scritto: > > > Giulia, >

Re: [deal.II] Re: mesh quality during deformations using MappingQEulerian

> Its great that you're getting somewhere with this! > > J-P, you (and the entire dealii community) are a paragon of encouragement, and I appreciate that very much. After I wrote you yesterday I was able to figure out how to 'play a journal file' from within an embedded python session within

Re: [deal.II] Re: deal.ii and Reduced Basis method

Giulia, there are also this thesis https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/52960 and the pyMOR package has deal.II interfaces: http://pymor.org/ Best W. On 12/01/2016 01:05 AM, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote: Dear Giulia, Judging by the lack of reply it seems that no-one knows of (or has

[deal.II] Re: deal.ii and Reduced Basis method

Dear Giulia, Judging by the lack of reply it seems that no-one knows of (or has implemented) an open-source library to specifically do model order reduction with deal.II. However, at least one of my colleagues uses deal.II to perform ROM via proper orthogonal decomposition, so deal.II