Control: tag -1 patch pending
Cyril Brulebois (2023-01-29):
> If we really want not to use a bare /firmware, maybe /firmware-lookup?
> But having something specialized in hw-detect and something much more
> generic in preseed would look strange to me. I don't really mind eit
iated semantic) right now.
>
> Yup, good call. We can extend this more to add the nuanced options
> once we've got the basics - let's do it incrementally!
Thanks for confirming the approach!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ue to the finish-install hook that disables cdrom
entries in certain conditions, which also adds the informative text
at the bottom. That can be kept as is.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
that's a short-term blocker at all.) But building a 2-column table out
of existing information shouldn't be much work anyway…
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
tic) right now.
Implementing this (and documenting it in the installation guide) would
make us comply with what was agreed to.
Swift feedback would be appreciated, thanks!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team
working on main & non-free & main-non-free-firmware, soon to become
main & non-free-firmware (once the move is complete). I don't have such
hardware to confirm what happens at runtime though.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I releas
Hi,
Here's an update regarding firmware packages vs. non-free-firmware. I'm
extending the list of recipients a little; feel free to let me know if
you spot packages/teams that I would have missed!
Cyril Brulebois (2023-01-17):
> For this first round, I've checked on amd64/unstable wh
place to configure to find all firmware packages
(release notes etc. are being worked on).
Thanks for your time!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
, is not
something I consider a blocker for the upcoming D-I release, or even for
the first Bookworm release. Just something that seems nice to have, if
we want to.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Fre
re the installer image, and rely
on an extra USB stick to hold the firmware part (and rely on mountmedia).
But again, I have no idea how common it is for the boards we support in
the installer to require loading firmware files during the installation
process…
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2023-01-24):
> I'm also not sure what our plan for e.g. ARM images (concatenateable
> images) would be; I don't think we'll pull any firmware packages during a
> d-i build, so they wouldn't end up under [2], but maybe it'd be feasible
> to just concatenate som
Cyril Brulebois (2023-01-24):
> In the meanwhile, I'll disable both mountmedia calls in the upcoming
> upload:
> - to reduce delays when official installation images are just
>self-sufficient (that's why we had that GR in the first place!);
I thought about this a few ho
shortcomings in the historical implementation.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Control: tag -1 pending
Cyril Brulebois (2023-01-21):
> I've pushed three commits in the pu/ifupdown+wireless branch:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/netcfg/-/commits/pu/ifupdown+wireless
Updated branch:
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/netcfg/-/commits/pu
Hi again,
Cyril Brulebois (2023-01-19):
> Sorry for the noise. I missed there were several rsync calls on the
> dak side, and at least dak needs patching…
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-team/dak/-/merge_requests/267
This was merged and works fine for sid, but for some reason, w
Control: tag -1 patch
Cyril Brulebois (2023-01-23):
> Can we please finally drop those checks? You'll find above the green
> light from Sean regarding lintian's possibly moving ahead of changes in
> Policy; since December, 5.6.11 even ends with:
>
> udebs and source pac
on what's been a huge time sink already.
The only packages where this field makes sense are packages which build
at least one deb binary package (not just udebs). For those, compliance
against current(-ish) Policy should be *actually* checked before adding
this field.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k
Hi lintian maintainers,
Cyril Brulebois (2022-04-13):
> Sean Whitton (2021-08-12):
> > On Tue 27 Jul 2021 at 04:08AM +02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >
> > > Whatever happens on the debian-policy front (if anything), I'd prefer if
> > > lintian would stop
Justin B Rye (2023-01-22):
> tldr: looks good to me.
[ + Holger's green light in the other mail. ]
Thanks to both of you!
I've managed to confirm patched apt-setup udebs alongside patched
hw-detect udebs give the desired results, so I've just uploaded
apt-setup.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Bruleb
Cyril Brulebois (2023-01-22):
> The configuration found below manages to:
> - let my allow-hotplug slow-to-appear wireless interface come up at
>boot-up, via the udev integration;
> - allow me to stop and start networking, losing then regaining all
>relevant configs (
Control: reopen 1022843
Control: found 1022843 0.8.40
Control: severity 1022843 serious
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2023-01-22):
> d-i believes that everything should be allow-hotplug, and we end up
> using that everywhere. I'm wondering whether to just use auto everywhere
> instead, since th
in:
https://bugs.debian.org/1029352
(which is mainly about wireless interfaces but ends up in the third
issue about other kinds of interfaces as well.)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consulta
Holger Levsen (2023-01-22):
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 05:01:36PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > don't we want to default this to true?
> > Why would we enable non-free-firmware if there's no use for it?
> > hw-detect makes that determination, based on contents p
Holger Levsen (2023-01-22):
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 04:24:12PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Template: apt-setup/non-free-firmware
> > Type: boolean
> > Default: false
>
> don't we want to default this to true?
Why would we enable non-free-firmware i
on into non-free-firmware, but we shouldn't block on this… I'll let
Holger comment about that part and possibly propose different plans.
Thanks for your help!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Fre
rned with networking.service
being marked as failed could always revert from “auto” to
“allow-hotplug” if that works for them (remember the timing issue
mentioned above).
→ ifupdown maintainers, comments welcome!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D
Cyril Brulebois (2023-01-19):
> At the moment, we have 3 packages there, with no appstream metadata at
> all. Questions:
>
> - Would that explain that no files are generated on mekeel, and
>therefore nothing is synced into the archive?
> - Or should we have empty indices
, having no dep11 indices for non-free-firmware breaks
debian-cd builds against unstable (which is how I'm testing support
for non-free-firmware in various components of the installer plus
debian-cd).
Thanks for your help!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<ht
Hi Al,
Al Watts (2023-01-19):
> /etc/systemd/timesyncd.conf appears to be unchanged from the default
> packaged config file, with all lines commented out.
It looks like we should create some /etc/systemd/timesyncd.conf.d/*.conf
snippet.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debi
ternal storage anyway, which
has proven to be confusing users anyway.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2023-01-18):
> On 1/18/23 15:28, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > While working on extending firmware support, I've stumbled upon floppy
> > support in various components. Even if the maintenance costs are low, I
> > suppose this could go away no
Hi,
While working on extending firmware support, I've stumbled upon floppy
support in various components. Even if the maintenance costs are low, I
suppose this could go away nowadays?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- R
done.
Uploading atmel-firmware_1.3-7.debian.tar.xz: done.
Uploading atmel-firmware_1.3-7_all.deb: done.
Uploading atmel-firmware_1.3-7_amd64.buildinfo: done.
Uploading atmel-firmware_1.3-7_amd64.changes: done.
Successfully uploaded packages.
Thanks for the swift
will require a similar review from there).
Please let us know if there's anything we can do to make your life
easier.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
--- Begin Message ---
Hi folks,
so maybe I'll be able to reproduce
it somewhere, and/or find a different solution to account for the newly
installed firmware (current plan would be to keep hw-detect ± as is
while introducing support for non-free-firwmare).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n-installer/binary-amd64/Packages.xz
-
https://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/bullseye/non-free/binary-amd64/Packages.xz
The first one lists udebs, to be used by the installer; the second one
lists debs, to be installed in the target system.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)&l
Start by refreshing your apt cache?
Also, while some of us can read error messages in German, it's best
practice to set LC_ALL=C so that you get English messages to report
(this is a development list, where English is expected).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debama
Control: notfound -1 20220917
Debian Bug Tracking System (2023-01-09):
> > # that version is nearest to "daily builds"
> > found 1028250 20220917
No, that bug isn't found in that version. We wouldn't have released d-i
with such an obvious issue.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brul
Control: severity -1 important
Cyril Brulebois (2023-01-08):
> I'm seeing at least two problems with cryptsetup while testing daily
> builds:
> - with 6.1.0-1 (currently getting into the archive), my very usual 1G
>RAM / 5G storage setup can no longer get an automated e
.
The first point could be waved aside with an errata entry; the second
point is going to be a blocker for the next release.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/
Samuel Thibault (2023-01-01):
> Yes, that's it, I have uploaded a fixed choose-mirror.
Many thanks for the investigation and the fix!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance C
nitrd.gz] Error 2
| make[1]: *** [Makefile:298: _build] Error 2
| make: *** [Makefile:292: build_kirkwood_netboot] Error 2
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ebian-boot/2022/12/msg00030.html
Yes, that's definitely a welcome and coordinated addition!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
0044.html
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
We know, there's no need to open a bug report against debian-installer
every time the Linux ABI is bumped.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- R
red out it doesn't make sense to.
OK. That was really minor/uninteresting anyway.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t error seems to come from ncurses
though (https://sources.debian.org/ is wonderful).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
es to your UID's ACL via the right commands file
but I'm not sure that's going to be successful since those are unknown
packages at the moment. We'll see.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freela
Hi again,
Cyril Brulebois (2022-12-12):
> I've glanced at depthcharge-tools-installer and while I'm no debconf
> expert and I can't assess the postinst with high certainty, the overall
> impression was good enough for me to sign and upload; I did change the
> Maintainer to debian
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2022-12-03):
> I'm happy to have those moved under installer-team/ whenever is most
> convenient for you and your potential sponsor.
I've done that a few days ago.
> I can't promise to do the reviewing/uploading right away (I'd like to
> tie up some loos
les end up in what udebs is decided in src:linux, under
debian/installer/modules.
Commit fixing the bug mentioned above:
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/782d644da7ab74e04bfebd30b66c264654028da3
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/
tramfs/modules-udebs changes for more boards as needed...
>
> [3] Solving "How Can I Run Debian on My Chromebook?" For Good
> https://debconf22.debconf.org/talks/87-solving-how-can-i-run-debian-on-my-chromebook-for-good/
I'll definitely catch up with it at some point!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
you indicate your availability and preferences between:
>
> - December 3rd
> - December 10th
> - December 17th
>
> At this point, the 10th is probably my preference, as I'm likely to be
> busy with work stuff at the tail end of November.
I should be able to make any of those work fo
fine.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
someone else might spot
something I might have missed.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
)
updated accordingly to allow uploading from platti instead of plummer.
A first build should show up after the next static push.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.
and debian-cd for
information given the way testing images are built…
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
workload on firmware and other things, it looks to me working
on this is likely to trigger more immediate questions/problems than
we'll have time to figure out before it's time to release.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager
oving that.
(It's hard to get right for end-users.)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
be packaged once their
redistributability is clarified?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ian/ftpsync/ after a build, so the
package doesn't look like it needs an update for that (even though a lot
of work happened in master since the last tag/release).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member --
ing.
Thanks for patching and verifying the extra component's presence on a
per-suite basis isn't an issue, that was on my to-do list.
And yes, it looks like bullseye-proposed-updates material to me; esp.
given that tiny diff…
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://de
tion (probably installation guide plus
release notes), and of course implementing it; then see if/how we expose
it?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e-installer/debootstrap-failed
I only followed that from afar, but I suspect the difference between
both installations is that netinst embeds init-system-helpers 1.64 (in
testing at the time the image was built), while netboot pulls 1.65.2
(in testing currently).
For the actual debootstrap issue, see #102042
tool had failed to
include or exclude the right entries. :)
Thanks for the fix!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
debian.org/DebianInstaller/Team
2. https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/errata
3. https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Hi dd@,
Cyril Brulebois (2022-09-12):
> Looking at the previous release cycles, such freezes usually last for a
> few days only, from a given debian-installer upload until installation
> images have been built successfully, and haven't found to be crippled
> with obvious bugs.
The
a déjà-vu while adding this in the upcoming one
(https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/News/2022/20220922):
- hw-detect:
+ Replace /etc/pcmcia/ with /etc/pcmciautils/ (#980271).
It would be great if someone could double-check what's going on here. :)
Cheers,
--
Cyril
Hi,
Ansgar (2022-09-20):
> Cyril Brulebois writes:
> > FTP Masters, please sync the installer from *tpu* to testing, once it's
> > available there.
> >
> > dak copy-installer 20220917 -s bookworm-proposed-updates
>
> Done:
>
> +---
> | $ dak co
-installer 20220917 -s bookworm-proposed-updates
Thanks for your help!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Samuel Thibault (2022-09-17):
> Cyril Brulebois, le sam. 17 sept. 2022 01:41:52 +0200, a ecrit:
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/commit/23e4451d7132e3bac7bd589747a44a776ea69834
> >
> > To get back on track with the release,
) instead, and
relying on an extra/hopefully final prop-up (as done during point
releases…) might be more straightforward.
Thanks for reading up so far, and for any advice on the way forward!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release m
all of
them could go away.
I see no urgency in getting that cleaned up though, you might want to
wait a little in case someone monitoring debian-boot@ expresses some use
case I didn't think of.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release m
Hi,
FTP Masters, please sync the installer from sid to testing, as it seems
to be Installed for all release architectures (9 total):
dak copy-installer 20220914
Release team: FYI, I've urgented it.
Thanks for your time.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<ht
already being used as a flag in other places.
Good to know, thanks.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ions.txt
2. https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2022/09/msg0.html
And… partman-hfs was one of them. Apparently, it's buildd-built and a
source-only upload should do the trick (that's what Holger did so far),
but I thought I'd mention it anyway.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
pt via the
packages_exceptions mechanism:
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i/-/commit/afd1b542b6f45a11a75afdfd68fe2781e8c8df8f
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
-powerpc64/hfs-modules
Until partman-hfs (possibly) hits testing, I'm tempted to ignore it
in calc-release-status, instead of dropping it entirely from the
l10n infrastructure: I suppose the latter would mean lower chances for
translators to work on this package?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k
Cyril Brulebois (2022-09-08):
> TL;DR: Everything matches what was already assessed by Steve McIntyre:
> mismatched shim* packages shouldn't be an issue from a d-i perspective,
> we're “just using the old shim” (sorry, buster…).
Furthermore, I've just checked on two laptops (Dell G3
ckages shouldn't be an issue from a d-i perspective,
we're “just using the old shim” (sorry, buster…).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Ansgar (2022-08-30):
> Yes. Changing the Priority in unstable will automatically propagate to
> testing, but (old)stable will be unaffected.
Perfect, thanks for the confirmation!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager --
the default set are a no
brainer, but I expect many admins to have some deployment code that
acts on rsyslog, either configuring it in some specific ways, or getting
rid of it… I wouldn't want stable to get a different set of packages
overnight, esp. if it comes via archive metadata updates, rather th
Holger Levsen (2022-08-29):
> So probably it would be better to either remove the file or write
> "uninitialized" into it... or support both via commandline flags :)
For anyone wanting to look into this, it doesn't seem worth it to add a
command line flag for this…
Cheers,
--
IRC: we
had a brief chat about it with Steve a few hours/days ago… That's been
on my todo list for months, but I'm still struggling to find time.
I'm trying to make that happen next week (provided Steve is available
for the debian-cd part).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
t; unstable/testing.
> >
> >
> > While at it, I also pulled a patch to fix build failures when
> > systemd is built against newer kernel headers (>= 5.14).
>
> Please go ahead; thanks.
LGTM, ta.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://deb
tpt usable after multi-threaded fork to prevent Ansible
> deadlocks.
No objections in principle on the d-i side.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Cyril Brulebois (2022-08-11):
> This breaks d-i builds, (at least) via libnl udebs picking up a
> dependency on sgml-base, which doesn't exist in a udeb context.
For completeness, I've just uploaded a workaround for src:libnl3 (see
https://bugs.debian.org/1016996 for details), so that part
re a workaround to
make sure this source package isn't a blocker when we plan for a Debian
Installer release.
I'll upload shortly, source debdiff attached. Please let me know if you
have any comments or questions.
In passing, thanks for your work on this package!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (
a bit.
This breaks d-i builds, (at least) via libnl udebs picking up a
dependency on sgml-base, which doesn't exist in a udeb context.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
more.
Fun you should be reprising that today, I stumbled upon it a few hours
ago while comparing upgraded 10→11 systems vs. fresh 11 systems…
No objections from the d-i side, sorry if that blocked the issue. :/
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D
.so
- after:
./lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
Thanks to Aurélien for investigating at the same time as I did, and for
the upcoming fix!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
and actual download.
TL;DR: No objections either way.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
test them.
>
> Given d-i does nothing with dmraid unless the boot flag is present,
> I want to ask if dmraid could also stop shipping its udeb, if thats
> ok with debian-boot?
Given how specific it is, opt-in, on a specific arch, and dead upstream,
looks like a wholesale removal
> do them at the same time or separately.
Leaving aside the debootstrap's pu/opu requests that I would be happy
not to have to be involved with (trusting Luca's assessment instead),
I'm happy to try and accommodate any dates that might be picked up for
10.13 and 11.5, for all other ins
eloper on the kernel command line, which should make
debconf queries/answers (as triggered by db_get and friends) appear in the
syslog. Past $self seems to agree:
https://mraw.org/blog/2012/12/23/d-i_hacking_recipe_3/
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
elp understand what's
going on.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ime (the function call itself
is already guarded within an #ifdef/#endif block, so it seems somewhat
optional already).
Feel free to let us know, and whether you'd like us to try and come up
with a tentative patch.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com
resolving this issue!
No worries, just applying your suggested changes, you're doing the work.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
g if
that makes sense.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
401 - 500 of 4333 matches
Mail list logo
