Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: etch beta1
(http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/etch_d-i/beta1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso)
md5sum ab2d19daaddd8616b189f8ca1dce3626
uname -a: Linux delphinus 2.6.12-1-amd64-generic #1 Wed Sep 28
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Fill in date and from where you got the image
uname -a:
Linux shambles 2.4.27-2-386 #1 Thu Jan 20 10:55:08 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
Date:
2005-05-10T11:00:00 UT
Method: Boot off sarge-i386-netinst.rc3.iso cdrom
Most
I had to remove 'gs' and 'gs-common' I believe.
This was during package installation after the boot I assume?
AFAICT the file should be owned by gs-common.
I think it happened when I was installing a pile of packages, using
the package list from another host, viz
foo$ dpkg --get-selections
There seemed to be a conflict over which package owns this file -
/usr/share/man/man1/gsnd.1.gz
gs-common, or some other package. I can't remember, think it was 'gs'.
I had to remove 'gs' and 'gs-common' I believe.
I went over to packages.d.o and ran a few queries.
dist package
Package: update-flashplugin
Hi
a little more info, hope this helps.
I have a sarge system in which I tried hacking
/etc/update-flashplugin.conf.rb
as noted above. This was the result.
# cat /etc/update-flashplugin.conf.rb
# -*- ruby -*-
#
module UpdateFlashPluginConf
SITES = {
#
Package: ssh
Version: 1:4.2p1-5
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
This may be another incidence of #328568, #328606.
I can ssh to localhost fine.
I can ssh to a remote debian host fine.
But when I ssh to an external host running sun's openssh I get a segv:
- the
I'd rather have 'ssh -vvv' output, if you could.
gladly:
$ ssh -vvv [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21 | tee log.ssh
OpenSSH_4.2p1 Debian-5, OpenSSL 0.9.8a 11 Oct 2005
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: Applying options for *
debug2: ssh_connect: needpriv 0
debug1: Connecting to
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.4-2sarge5
Followup-For: Bug #322239
Hi
I think I am seeing this too. It was reported in #316824 (for 'mozilla')
but I did not cross-report to 'mozilla-firefox'.
The patch below should fix the issue, see #316824 for why I think
it fixes it.
PLEASE can you
I think I am seeing this too. It was reported in #316824 (for 'mozilla')
but I did not cross-report to 'mozilla-firefox'.
The patch below should fix the issue, see #316824 for why I think
it fixes it.
I don't see why the firefox script should circumvent YOUR broken
LD_LIBRARY_PATH. If your
And what about people that actually intend to use libraries from other
locations instead of those in /lib, without breaking firefox ?
Sorry, but I'm not following you. How would that come about?
The library in question is libgcc_s.so.1.
When would someone running a 'stable' system need to
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.28.6
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
*** Please type your report below this line ***
When I come to upgrade some of my machines from woody to sarge, and want
to upgrade aptitude as the first step, in some cases aptitude wants to
remove over 100 packages, in other cases,
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.4-2sarge5
Severity: normal
Hi
we run our systems with plain old 'lpr' as the print subsystem, so
we rely on the xprint package for printing direct from the browser
to the printer of choice (it's possible you want to print some things
to a b/w printer, and
Package: base-files
Version: 3.1.2
Severity: minor
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi
The nsswitch.conf(5) manpage does not explain how to override some fields in
/etc/passwd, with the compat option. In fact I could not easily find any
reference to the full +/- semantics
Package: mysql-client
Severity: minor
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hello,
I was about to install mysql-client and saw that mysql-doc was
suggested, so I thought I'd install that too. Is this a bug?
# apt-get install mysql-client
Reading Package Lists... 0%
Reading Package
The package not in main but in non-free due to license restrictions.
Most probably you don't non-free in your /etc/apt/sources.list.
The docs are available on http://dev.mysql.com anyway so it's no big
problem if you don't want non-free stuff on your computer.
thanks for your response.
In my
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: etch i386 netinst daily 2006.12.12
md5sum 135db969cce6d94c64adb9f42764581a
uname -a: Linux testhost 2.6.18-3-686 #1 SMP Mon Dec 4 16:41:14 UTC 2006 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 2006.12.13
Method:
How did you install? netinst
Package: installation-guide
Hi,
in the installation guide, at
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch06s03.html
there is a discussion of Configuring Your Mail Transport Agent that
no longer reflects the debian installer (at least as of rc1 or later).
In the d-i tree the text is at
retitle 402851 [i386][netinst][daily 20061212] Dell Optiplex 745 (mostly
successful)
thanks mate
it helps googlers if the machine model name is in the title...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: coreutils
Version: 5.2.1-2.1
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
This is a pure 'etch' system.
This seemed a somewhat intermittent problem, but I'm sure it's real.
Below is a transcript that shows it occurring.
Observations:
* The problem seems to be
What does type -all df(assuming bash) or which df(other shell) say
when run from your root account?
# echo $SHELL
/bin/bash
# which df
/bin/df
# type -all df
df is a function
df ()
{
/bin/df -k
}
df is /bin/df
ah. fascinating. how the blue blazes did that get there?
It's not a symlink
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta3/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
Linux tinsley 2.6.16-2-686 #1 Fri Aug 18 19:01:49 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2006-08-23T22_00_00+1000
Method:
How
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta3/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
Linux tinsley 2.6.16-2-686 #1 Fri Aug 18 19:01:49 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2006-08-23T22_00_00+1000
Method:
How
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta3/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
Linux tinsley 2.6.16-2-686 #1 Fri Aug 18 19:01:49 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2006-09-09T22_00_00+1000
Method:
How
Package: alsa-utils
Version: 1.0.13-1
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Please adjust severity as you see fit, it might be important.
This is a pure 'etch' system, with Maestro card (lspci output below).
I am trying to get some sound output (from the headphone
Steps to reproduce:
user$ /usr/sbin/alsactl names
User can not write to /etc/asound.names
same occurs if I run as root.
What tells
$ ls -al /etc/asound.names
?
user$ ls -al /etc/asound.names
ls: /etc/asound.names: No such file or directory
user$ ls -la /etc/as*
ls: /etc/as*: No
[...]
I still get a hard lockup.
The file ~/asound_user.names is not created.
I checked around in /var/log, all I could find were boot-time messages
in /var/log/messages, eg
Oct 18 20:46:42 tinsley kernel: es1968: not attempting power management.
Oct 18 20:46:42 tinsley kernel:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
That seems to be ok. Are you able to play your known good mp3 with
alsaplayer, mpg321 or similar? Make sure nothing is muted in
alsamixer.
alsaplayer - very faint and muffled sound.
mpg321 - no discernable sound
Are you a member of group
Package: unixodbc
Version: 2.2.11-13
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
not sure this is a bug but here goes. Feel free to close or reassign.
This occurred on a pure etch machine.
I just did a normal update/upgrade cycle,
then a dist-upgrade,
and a couple of
Package: apt-proxy
Version: 1.9.35
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
Not sure what priority is appropriate here, since it's semi-related to
verification of security updates.
I just installed apt-proxy on a pure etch machine, and tried running in
debug mode.
Package: xfonts-base
Version: 1:1.0.0-4
Severity: minor
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
not sure if this is a bug or a transition issue around xorg 7.0.
I just upgraded a pure-etch system and got these warnings:
Setting up xfonts-base (1.0.0-4) ...
warning:
Package: wifi-radar
Version: 1.9.6-2
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
As a normal user I typed:
$ /usr/sbin/wifi-radar
and was rewarded with:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/sbin/wifi-radar, line 1357, in ?
confFile.write( open( CONF_FILE,
Package: systemimager-server
Version: 3.2.3-6sarge2
Severity: normal
Hi,
I was using getimage to make a backup of a woody host before upgrading to sarge.
This is what happened:
foo# prepareclient
finishes normally
master# getimage -golden-client foo -image foo -exclude /data/
creates
Followup-For: Bug #386497
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686
*** Please type your report below this line ***
See also bugs 380188, 383264
I attempted to boot linux-image-2.6.17-2-686-bigmem and also had this
failure. This kernel was from backports.org, _but_ only these changes had
been made:
Package: offlineimap
Version: 4.0.9
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I can reproduce this, though not always at the same point in the transfer.
My setup is as follows
server: ms exchange 2000 version 6.0.6603.0
On the server I have two folders in the listed
Hi John
I was just interested in helping confirm the problem is localised to Tk.
If that's not necessary I'll shut up.
..
sounds exactly like that sort of thing I've seen. You might try the
console blinkenlights interface. I suspect it will work fine for you,
and that the bug is really in
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: cdrom, with command install
Image version: Etch RC1 netinst
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc1/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 2006 Nov 30 0500 GMT
Machine: Dell Poweredge 1850, no raid controller
BIOS A05, MPT
Package: exim4
Op 30-11-2006 om 15:39 schreef Vincent McIntyre:
It looks pretty good otherwise.
Okay, closing installation-reports #401007
Bug: exim4 auto-configuration assumes short hostnames
-
When prompted for the hostname
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-8
Severity: normal
Hi,
I checked but could not see this filed, apologies if it's done already.
The WA government made a very late decision to start daylight saving
this weekend, 2/3 Dec 2006. This means the timezone data for Australia
need yet another update.
Please understand that I think the default config you've arrived at
is good. I was just a bit surprised that the exim4 step was missing;
when it didn't show up I thought something was amiss.
I understand the wish not to bother people with the questions about
MTA configuration, these can be
Please let me know if something is wrong or badly written.
It's a great idea to document this problem and ways to deal with it.
It's an extremely unsettling experience to have it occur unexpectedly.
Could I suggest taking your notes one step further, and explaining how to
fix it permanently,
Hello,
I allow that my contribution to the Debian GNU/Linux release
notes can be distributed under any DFSG-free license.
Good luck with the next release notes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jeremy
[ for some reason I did not get an email with your question, only the
bug did... Should I have gotten one if you sent mail just to the bug?
This may have been a transitory problem in our email system.
]
Is this also the last message you see when using Expert Installation?
Yes,
package: debian-installer
Version: Debian GNU/Linux installer 4.0 (installer build 20070308etch2)
severity: minor
I was wondering how to set a label on a partition (not a partition
table, but a label that e2label could read).
I couldn't see this documented in [1] so I wrote a patch, attached.
package: debian-installer
severity: wishlist
Hi,
I was looking at packages/apt-setup/generators/and noticed a
difference between the way that 91security and 92volatile add lines
to the new sources.list file (subversion, r54582):
91security does this -
echo deb http://$host/
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: lenny i386 hd-media daily 2008.07.21
(see comments for details)
uname -a: (does not boot)
Date: 2008.07.22
Method:
How did you install? Boot from USB key.
What did you boot off? USB key
If network install, from
I tried lenny beta 2, that booted successfully.
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz
md5: 6d3bb654070a821de94774f89dd5d11d
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/lenny_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-LennyBeta2-i386-netinst.iso
md5:
I tried 20080721 again, to be sure I hadn't muffed the usb install.
I redid the setup of the key, as described in the initial report,
double-checking I did not have the think mounted by usbmount or
whatever while I was zcatting to it.
Same result.
I see 'linux' and 'initrd.gz' all
Vincent, have you made another Debian installation on the same system
since your original installation report (9 Mar 2007)? Did you
experencie a similar issue? If you have not, would you take the time to
boot a recent build of d-i (netboot mini.iso will do) and see if the
problem is still
addendum:
see also bug #439462
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439462
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I see this issue reliably on etch systems.
In /var/log/daemon.log I see lines like:
automount[21298]: cache_ghost: entry in yp:auto-pks.direct not valid
map format, key /applic
This occurs for all items in the map. The entries all look like:
/applic -hard,intr,grpid
Package: base-config
Version: 2.73
Severity: normal
Hi,
not sure what the severity is, please adjust to suit.
I was examining the /etc/host.conf file on some etch boxes.
host.conf(5) explains that
multi Valid values are on and off. If set to on, the resolv+ library will
return
Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-5etch1
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
This system is running pure etch, with no backports.
$ strace -o /tmp/vlc.strace vlc
View-Playlist
Manage-Services Discovery -Manage Playlists-SAP Announcements
The
Package: totem-xine
Version: 2.16.5-3
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
This system is straight etch with no backports.
totem appears to be looking for some file that it is expecting kde to
have created for it, and is completely unable to cope if it's not there.
Hi Josselin
Is artsd started when you see this error?
I don't think so.
% ps -fade|grep arts
nothing
% dpkg -S artsd
libkdepim1a: /usr/lib/kde3/plugins/designer/kpartsdesignerplugin.so
libarts1c2a: /usr/lib/libartsdsp.so.0
libarts1c2a: /usr/bin/artsdsp
libarts1c2a: /usr/bin/artsd
I tried democracyplayer as well, this may help to narrow things down.
It opens the gui, takes me through the config dialog (I said no)
to all questions and then dies again.
On the second invocation (see below) it skips the setup and dies
immediately after completing the drawing of the
Then it is a bug in libxine1.
I'll let the xine maintainers tell us whether this is fixed in the
unstable version.
ok, thanks.
To work around this issue, you can set audio.driver: alsa
in .gnome2/totem_config.
I tried this, perhaps I got it wrong.
% cat ~/.gnome2/totem_config
cat:
To work around this issue, you can set audio.driver: alsa
in .gnome2/totem_config.
Either that, or you can also remove the arts plugin from the filesystem,
if you don't use it:
sudo rm /usr/lib/xine/plugins/1.1.2/xineplug_ao_out_arts.so
I first tried renaming, but totem still managed to
Hi Lo,
thanks for your prompt reply.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x08373888 ***
This is what you should try to fix first; anything happening
afterwards is uninteresting to research as this is a memory corruption
Hi,
ouch, this is annoying when you hit it.
I found just adding a README file to the svn repo was sufficient,
without having to patch the code.
Also, I'll voice my support for this to be patched in the stable
release, either via security or a point release.
thanks for your work on trac,
Hi,
attached is a patch against 1.9.36, the version currently in unstable.
Please consider applying this.
I did check that bzip2 haven't changed locations again.
Vince
--- usr/share/pycentral/apt-proxy/site-packages/apt_proxy/cache.py.orig
2007-12-07 14:12:28.354666060 +1100
+++
oops, just in case there is any confusion, that patch was against
1.9.36.1
not
1.9.36
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: RC3 netinst
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/rc3/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
md5 sum 95042ee7c74ce5a512ecaba41cea225d
uname -a: unable to boot. attempted to boot 2.4.27 (default)
Date: 26 Mar 2005
Method: Boot
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: RC3 netinst
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/rc3/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
md5 sum 95042ee7c74ce5a512ecaba41cea225d
uname -a: 2.4.27-2-sparc64
Date: 26 Mar 2005
Method: Boot from netinst cdrom
Machine: Sun
Package: debconf
Severity: wishlist
I think this is the right package to file against...
Would it be possible to display, in the corner of the debian installer
dialogs, the current verbosity (I think it is called priority) setting?
e.g.
| |
Hi Blars
The xkb problem has been fixed, both /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/sun/{us,se}
have the semicolons removed in the latest xlibs package.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=299370
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
A bit more digging on the gentoo lists reveals this:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-1766279.html#1766279
The problem is basically related to the recoding of isofs starting at
silo 1.3.0, it seems some kit (newer specially) doesn't like the new
iso first. This affects up to
from a Dell PowerEdge 1850.
# cat /proc/megaraid/hba0/config
v2.10.3 (Release Date: Thu Apr 8 16:16:05 EDT 2004)
PERC 4e/Si
Controller Type: 438/466/467/471/493/518/520/531/532
Controller Supports 40 Logical Drives
Controller capable of 64-bit memory addressing
Controller is not using 64-bit
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
netinst from http://www.acm.cs.rpi.edu/~dilinger/iso.img
MD5 sum: 03f1445c82c80e51254b55616eb99479
'file' output:
Sun disk label 'CD-ROM Disc with Sun sparc boot created by mkisofs' 768
alts/cyl, 768 data cyls,
This problem has now occurred on a third machine with very similar
configuration to that shown above.
Cheers
Vince
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: mysql-server-5.0
Version: 5.0.32-7etch1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
Background
--
I had reason to want to move the location of the binary logs and I
think this may have uncovered a small bug.
I was able to move the
Package: debian-goodies
Version: 0.27
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
not sure about the severity.
# apt-get install debian-goodies
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
curl
Suggested
Hi
it would be helpful to me also to have ifplugd working earlier in the
boot, so that a machine that wants to ypbind can do that:
% ls /etc/rc2.d/*{nis,ifplugd}*
/etc/rc2.d/S19nis /etc/rc2.d/S20ifplugd
It's helpful to have ifplugd because if the machine is unplugged then
there is no
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.46.4-0.1
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
I could not see an existing report of this problem, e.g. I don't think
this is #409336.
Background
--
I have a nightly cron job that installs security updates only, using a
short
Package: debian-reference
Version: CVS, Sun Jan 14 18:30:35 UTC 2007
Severity: wishlist
The network chapter is really useful.
However I wondered about the subsection on hotplug[1] - I thought udev
was supposed to replace hotplug in all its uses, but it's difficult to
get unambigous information
Followup-For: Bug #354989
Package: wget
Version: 1.9.1-12
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I was attempting to download this large file from mirror.linux.org.au
(server was ProFTPD 1.2.10)
ftp ls
200 PORT command successful
150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for file list
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
apologies for the late response...
I've written a new section explaining the default configuration and how to
configure exim4 after the installation. The new section is intended to be
included in chapter 8 which has some post-installation information.
A
I can confirm this bug.
This might be related to some compatibility with libgtk2.0-0 ?
% script log.gtk
% strace gtkdialog
% exit
% grep ^open /tmp/log.gtk | grep -v ENOENT | \
sed -e 's/^.*\(.*\),.*/\1/' |xargs grep -li gtkdialog
/usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
Cheers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge6
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
Hope I'm reporting this to the correct place...
This is a straight sarge system. Hardware info below.
The problem I observe is that -
when /etc/cron.daily/sysklogd runs,
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD, with the command 'install'
Image version: Netinst daily image
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso, version 20070211-2.iso
md5sum: 045f122cd20090fca10772c72f61ab57
Date:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.85f
Severity: minor
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
I found the message printed by /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local
if it can't get a root filesystem helpful, but I think it could be better.
A suggested patch is attached for your
it is terse on purpose, it is a 2 liner in the sense that not too much
info scrolls off, we need it for the bug report. it has been shown that
user think that those last lines are _bug_ relevant!?
if you enhance current text in 2 lines i'd be happy to reconsider.
Thanks for your reply, I was
Package: xsane-common
Version: 0.99+0.991-2
Severity: minor
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
kudos for the xsane etc packages; worked first time for me!
However as I was reading the documentation I noticed the file
usr/share/doc/xsane/html/sane-xsane-doc.html
refers to
reassign kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686
thanks
Hi,
I don't know why I filed this against kernel-source-2.6.8.
I've received no response at all, so let's try reassigning.
I looked through the existing reports and could not see any
that correspond to this exactly. The closest is #342387.
-- System
Followup-For: Bug #246296
Package: a2ps
Version: 1:4.13b.dfsg.1-1
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
is the version that fixed this (a2ps_4.13b-5) going to get into etch?
For people who hit this, there is a simple workaround to the problem:
# apt-get --purge remove a2ps
#
Package: libquota-perl
Version: 1.4.9-2
Severity: wishlist
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
the upstream for this package has updated four times in the last few
years (since 1.4.9 in 2003), admittedly with only small changes.
However there are notes in 1.5.1 relating to 64-bit
just to folow up on this.
I did some tests with real filesystems on block devices, instead of
loopback devices, on an etch system that previously exhibited the bug.
(nis 3.17-6, libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13)
While the system still showed the bug with ext3 filesystem images mounted
via /dev/loopN, it did
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.0.10-6
Severity: important
Perhaps this is a bug in the NIS package but since the fault affects
rpc.mountd I am filing here first. Feel free to reassign...
Summary
---
I have a system which exports one filesystem.
Access to the export is controlled
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Run strace with -s 5000 or similar, and you'll see the entire error message.
This smells _very_ much like a NIS bug. :-)
here's the output, not quite sure what it means.
7538 write(2, rpc.mountd: nss_nis/nis-netgrp.c:78: _nss_nis_setnetgrent:
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: etch amd64 netinst 4.0r0 (20070308)
uname -a: Linux testhost.atnf.CSIRO.AU 2.6.18-4-amd64 #1 SMP Fri May 4 00:37:33
UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Date: 2007.06.05
Method:
How did you install? netinst cdrom, with 'install'
I plan to wait for a new upstream version before uplaoding a new
package, but I could provide you with an updated version if you want.
that's ok. It only affects the test rig, not production use.
Thanks for taking the time to look into it.
Cheers
Vince
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: debian-installer
Version: etch 4.0r0
Severity: minor
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
This issue did not cause any problems during the installation, but I
don't think it is intended behaviour, so I've guessed minor severity.
This seems to be the same problem as
Package: debian-installer-manual
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
I have been looking into preseeding and partitioning, and noticed what
appears to be an omission in the example code.
The example shows a nice expert recipe but does not include the
Package: debian-installer-manual
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
The coverage of partitioning in the preseeding appendix is quite brief
and I think it would be helpful to point people to the additional
information available in
I've just found something in my preseeding file that seems to change the
story here.
For some reason I had this as the first line of the expert recipe item:
partman-auto/expert_recipe string boot-root
instead of
d-i partman-auto/expert_recipe string boot-root
Argh.
I commented out the
Hi,
It's been almost a month now since I filed this, with no response apart
from Steinar kindly forwarding it to the right place.
Can you give any indication of when it is likely to be addressed?
How can I help resolve it?
This bug is a serious blocker for us moving our systems to etch.
Cheers
Package: texlive-pdfetex
Version: 2005.dfsg.2-12
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
this is probably a duplicate but I have no idea how to divine the
root cause. Bugs that look similar are #419893 and #421969.
I was doing a regular apt-get update; apt-get
Hi Norbert,
thanks for the quick reply.
On Sam, 19 Mai 2007, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
I was doing a regular apt-get update; apt-get upgrade and got stuck
over the package 'tipa'. I've tried removing it and get clobbered
by texlive-pdfetex trying to configure itself, so I'm filing here
Greetings,
Hm, is the right fmtutil.cnf used?
kpsewhich --format='web2c files' fmtutil.cnf
run as root (or however you do the upgrade) should output
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf
% su
# kpsewhich --format='web2c files' fmtutil.cnf
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf
# wc
I was upgrading from sarge to etch and had this symptom well.
My problems appear to be self-inflicted but there may actually be
a problem in the postinst. So the information below is for your
perusal, in case it helps resolve things.
The root cause in my case was the existing database was
Package: ifp-line-libifp
Version: 1.0.0.2-3
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
after upgrading from 'sarge' to 'etch' I found that the 'ifp' command
line program appears not to be working properly. I took a look at the
changelog and README - can't see anything
1 - 100 of 362 matches
Mail list logo
