/ can be bothered to change
that.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands
this is already reported as
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/26/26971.html
(release critical!)
Yes, I reported it. Apparently (from the makedev changelog) a new upstream
version was used, and I'm assuming that that's when the ISDN stuff was
lost.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work
expect
this sort of thing to happen... It's just necessary that those packages
that use imlib have to be rebuilt. It worked fine on the Alpha
architecture, where we can do that in one swell foop.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
On Mon 05 Oct 1998, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05-Oct-98 Paul Slootman wrote:
Do you really mean _all_ other packages? AFAIK you can have libjpegg6a
and libjpeg6b installed together (I didn't find a libjpegg6b package).
Additionally, isn't it that so that those packages that use imlib
.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands
On Mon 05 Oct 1998, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Sun 04 Oct 1998, James Troup wrote:
Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Old/slow/lomem machines can't properly compile X or Mozilla anyway.
Bzzt. I've compiled xfree86 for Debian/m68k on a 386/25 equivalent
with only 14Mb (don't ask
.
Demon (a large ISP in the UK and the Netherlands, www.demon.net)
uses Exim as its customer-facing smtp interface, so I guess that they're
convinced as well.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software
a user I never
really understood what this bo was doing on my cd.
Using something that is more clearly a codename (like Red Hat's
Hurricane, for example) would be an advantage there.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
On Wed 07 Oct 1998, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998 13:00:51 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
I personally have confidence in Exim's quality in this regard.
Demon (a large ISP in the UK and the Netherlands, www.demon.net)
uses Exim as its customer-facing smtp interface, so I guess
there in the changes file... Note that this would imply that there
should also be a [EMAIL PROTECTED] which would usually
be the same as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (but not always! The
maintainer may use something else besides i386 as his platform).
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED
a message about wrong versions, so at least it doesn't crash).
That said, it's trivial to rebuild (if perhaps a bit longwinded).
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands
in a number of texts though.
Yeah, I know...but when I'm writing little 2second programs to check
something I tend to not fuss with returns, etc, etc...
Then you should just leave out the void in front of main;
that's less typing and does the right thing :-)
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL
architecture is _not_ a port.
I'm thinking of using my Alpha as primary platform for my packages,
let the i386 people take care of porting them! (Although I think that
porting would never happen...)
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
.
It's unfortunate that there's no way to tell the kernel that the data
being read sequentially, so there's no point in keeping that data around
in the buffer cache after it's been passed to user-land...
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED
this because I ran into a package lately that didn't build
with libstdc++2.9-dev, it needed libg++-dev installed.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands
and
found no explanation.
I think strace is too useful for debugging and should not be removed.
Seconded! I agree fully.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands
.
To be picky it's should be its :-) Otherwise it says
about it is friends (it's is short for it is).
Besides that I agree.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands
the point of supplying source packages if
they're useless.
I mean that we should converge on using the same build environment and build
Source dependencies would be a *big* help.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
1.0.3 release) (according to /proc/version). That works
perfectly with ISDN and all, and stayed up for a month until I upgraded
sysvinit which then decided to run through all the init scripts etc ;-(
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu 15 Oct 1998, J.H.M. Dassen Ray wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 01:50:33PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
I last compiled (with success) 2.0.36pre2 with gcc version egcs-2.90.29
980515 (egcs 1.0.3 release) (according to /proc/version). That works
perfectly with ISDN and all, and stayed
-1.1 release)
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands
in
potato... So, if this is an effort to reduce the number of release-
critical bugs (for _slink_), then IMHO it's the wrong way to go about
it.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede
needed to -8pre9v2. I'll say it again:
http://master.debian.org/~paul/alpha/xfree86/xfree86-alpha.diff
Without these, the X server crashes and burns. PLEASE add these patches
before uploading -9 !
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
vbox
If anyone has better suggestions (I haven't really thought hard about this
yet) I'd like to hear them (please include reasoning).
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede
On Sat 23 Jan 1999, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 11:36:23AM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
isdnutils contains the basic isdnctrl, ipppd stuff needed for
networking
isdnmonitoring isdnlog, imon, xisdnload, ... that sort of thing
isdndocs the faqs and other docs
-bit entities need to be aligned on even
addresses, 32-bit entities on (addr % 4 == 0) addresses, and 64-bit
addresses must be aligned on (addr % 8 == 0) addresses.
I'm guessing the same holds true for sparc(64).
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED
is that if you can't trust a pgp signature to
sign a gpg key, why should trust a pgp signature to do anything
at all, e.g. accept an uploaded package. Seems like a reasonable
argument.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
that they
should in fact erase the package? In short, the problem just moves
around; being able to revoke a key is great, but still leaves many
problems open.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian
On Wed 15 Sep 1999, Philip Hands wrote:
I know there is some pathetic kudos about how many signatures you have
Is the pathetic part the reason why you don't have any? :-)
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
that a glance at the rules file
will make clear). Once it builds, I do 'debian/rules clean' and then
restart the package build, to ensure that the final package can be
reproduced (restarting things from the middle sometimes leads to things
happening differently).
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL
On Wed 15 Sep 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Perhaps someone made a typo and closed the wrong bug?
It was apparently done by the maintainer, and no further response
from him. Curious.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed 15 Sep 1999, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
The man page defines a table like so:
What happens if you pass the -pt option to man?
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL
debian:30380 debian.devel:24066
You expand locally to a newsgroup?
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
On Thu 16 Sep 1999, Joe Drew wrote:
I've received an OK from the author of Rael's Binary Grabber to redistribute
Perhaps you could shed some light on what `Rael's Binary Grabber' is?
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED
...
Where is Oldenburg geographically? E.g. how far from Holland? :-)
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
is STILL not getting added (it is 7609 JD; yes, with a
space), and also my coordinates (0521952 / 0063753) were not added.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
On Thu 23 Sep 1999, Paul Slootman wrote:
I should have used https://www.debian.org/ in the original mail.
No, you should have used https://db.debian.org/ ...
I get 'connection refused by the server'...
... because db.debian.org does accept https connections, while
www.debian.org doesn't
connect daily to a
random 5-10 systems out of a collection 700 hosts (each running ssh
1.2.17), which IMHO means the sample is quite random, but then
statistics lessons was a long time ago).
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED
:
if ($1 == ENOENT) {
$dorename = 0;
} else
unlink (${file}.dpkg-devert.tmp);
Note the missing braces round the unlink statement.
Besides, devert is spelled wrong (but that's not important).
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
mime-support should be installed much
earlier.
Also, when upgrading mime-support, it always offers to replace the
conffile /etc/mailcap, which is NEVER a smart thing to do. Maybe
/etc/mailcap should be one of the base files, and not part of
mime-support?
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL
server modules built by the stock 4.0 source
tree.
A separate xserver section might be useful for separating the servers
(and fonts etc) and the applications. If you have a working X setup,
then you don't need to look at xserver/*, only x11/* when looking for a
certain app.
Paul Slootman
--
home
On Mon 13 Mar 2000, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Paul Slootman wrote:
Also, when upgrading mime-support, it always offers to replace the
conffile /etc/mailcap, which is NEVER a smart thing to do. Maybe
/etc/mailcap should be one of the base files, and not part of
mime
It _is_ useful to be able to install these separate parts, of course...
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
On Fri 24 Mar 2000, Peter Makholm wrote:
In SSLUG (swedish/danish LUG) we have begun translating
man-pages to danish. when we have finished a nice set (like
file-utils) I will make a debian package out of it.
Wouldn't manpages-dk be the correct name?
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL
On Tue 28 Mar 2000, Peter Makholm wrote:
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wouldn't manpages-dk be the correct name?
That depends
The two letter language code is da and the two letter country code is
DK (making the correct locale: LC_ALL=da_DK)
There shouldn't be any
to have
all it's sockets matched to it or generally root user will
see all the necessary information in place.
Ah, it's not in the synopsis, but _is_ described.
BTW: it should be all its sockets, no apostrophe.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
) if you choose option 4. I don't think that any daemons
etc. try to deliver to a local user via SMTP.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
FYI:
On Wed 28 Jun 2000, Paul Slootman wrote:
The README says:
Noffle is a Usenet news server optimized for few users and low speed
dial-up
connections to the Internet. It acts as a server to news clients running
on
the local host, but gets its news feed by acting
On Mon 07 Aug 2000, Ruud de Rooij wrote:
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm in the process for building the latest version of the isdnutils,
with the latest upstream sources. However, I've run into a glitch,
licence-wise. The isdnlog people have decided to use CDB instead
the required files.
This couldn't be handled by `expect' or similar?
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
. Or was that the high 8 bits of AX etc...
Apart from that, using assembler is evil (if there isn't a C language
alternative) because then your source will never run on anything
besides the processor the assembler code is written for.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
to be. Should this be considered spam? As far as I'm
concerned, it's unsollicited commercial email, thus spam.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
:
boxes and deroff. I'm sure there are more. But otherwise, some
are probably good suggestions.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux
notice something isn't running,
and you wonder whether there was some message from the init.d script.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
On Fri 18 Aug 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 10:20:48AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Thu 17 Aug 2000, Colin Watson wrote:
(I usually recommend Ctrl-S (stop output) and Ctrl-Q (restart output).)
Or shift-PageUp
Of course, if you run a display manager, you
coloured output..
Then you must have some other arrangement to get the colors;
it's not enabled by default. Try a fresh install (I have).
Maybe a direct setting of LS_COLORS in your .bash_profile or
whatever?
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work
necessary. I hope that
when debian 2.3 is frozen you will take the time to do another
thorough review _before_ it is released.
Regards,
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed 30 Aug 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Paul Slootman wrote:
Then you must have some other arrangement to get the colors;
it's not enabled by default. Try a fresh install (I have).
Maybe a direct setting of LS_COLORS in your .bash_profile or
whatever?
Nope:
[tornado
.
Yuck. Smells like a serious buffer overflow somewhere.
This needs to be fixed fast.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: [EMAIL
Package: imap
Version: 4.7c-1
Severity: important
On Thu 31 Aug 2000, Paul Slootman wrote:
Yuck. Smells like a serious buffer overflow somewhere.
Upon a quick glance, there indeed appears to be no checks at all
for buffer overflows. A buf of 8k is allocated into which the
From:, Status:, X
behaviour, hence different sizes.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.isdn4linux.de/
I can't ssh to it, and www.debian.org doesn't work either.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
those kinds of
annoyances.
It would be useful if dpkg-buildpackage checked it then.
I thought it did, and exactly what you describe (crapping out)
happened, even though there _were_ build-depends. That sucked to
the extreme (yes, it was a huge package and yes, it happened near
the end).
Paul
developers.map.jpeg as a .map image-map file according to this error:
It sounds like it's not recognizing the .jpeg, and using .map instead?
Is .jpeg a recognized extension for .jpg?
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
for uploading yet. Perhaps you should ask for
more help in debian-mentors (which is for helping new maintainers)?
Good luck,
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
that the system
:administrator can rearrange the links, provided that they
:leave at least one link remaining, without having their
:configuration overwritten.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED
is updated (two times
Don't remove _all_ the symlinks, leave the K ones. Or move one of the
symlinks to rc5.d or whatever.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
??$PKGNAME ]; then
/etc/rc$RC.d/S??$PKGNAME start
fi
That's ignoring file-rc, unfortunately. Is there an easy way of
determining whether a certain init.d script should be started in
the current runlevel that works also with file-rc ?
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL
to List-Directory :-(
On pandora I just did the following:
$ touch a b c A B C
$ echo [[:lower:]]
a b c
$ echo [[:upper:]]
A B C
$ echo [a-c]
a b c
The scary thing (for me :-) is that this also works on Solaris already.
At least, with ksh, not in sh.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL
. It just reads /var/run/utmp, like who does, so
it should be trivial to add the -r flag to who :-)
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
and staying there). Nowadays xdm
detects that the X server is looping, and after a couple of times
stops restarting the X server. This has saved me once or twice.
Thanks, Branden! (or was it someone else's work?)
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work
) which allows a script to query if a
certain init.d script should be started [in the current runlevel].
This sounds like the most reasonable way of doing it IMHO.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl
be retrieved without logging in. Misleading.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.isdn4linux.de
to do about it?)
Enjoy,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for internet connectivity.
He did, and now knows that it is possible to have a reliable internet
connection. He now also pays in excess of US$1000 a year _less_ for it.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
On Fri 08 Sep 2000, Michael Beattie wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:40:02AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
These packages have been uploaded to the experimental distribution
(but not yet installed at this moment, maybe today?),
but are also available by using the following line in /etc/apt
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
In any case, reverse DNS lookup is reasonable, no matter what you
think of DUL.
I have to agree with this. The previous time, the discussion was using
DUL to block email
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
Today, Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been promising this for a while, but now it's happened:
The latest version of isdn4k-utils has been packaged.
Yippie!
:-)
deb http://www.murphy.nl/~paul/debian isdnutils/
After this, apt-get
it already does?
Maybe I'm weird.
No comment :-)
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
it's a (for me non-obvious) bug in bash.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.isdn4linux.de
/isdn.conf.de.gz which should have the
correct settings. Or throw away your /etc/isdn/isdn.conf and run
dpkg-reconfigure isdnlog :-)
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
week.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.isdn4linux.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Paul Slootman wrote:
These packages have been uploaded to the experimental distribution
(but not yet installed at this moment, maybe today?),
FYI: I got got mail from the installer that it's been put into
experimental.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
for this
condescending part of his otherwise correct article. He should be
So now _you_ are telling someone to ask for forgiveness?
Paul Slootman (not a follower of RMS myself)
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl
some smart stuff in vboxmail and vboxplay that I had
added in the 3.0 series of isdnutils.
The old ones (3.1pre1b-1) is available in
http://www.murphy.nl/~paul/debian/isdnutils/1/ if the need arises...
Enjoy. I'll be back on Monday.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
-2.deb from
all architectures in sid?
Is there a build-info for all the other platforms, too? How can I see why
the alpha failed to build my package?
See bug 81379 :-)
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
On Sun 07 Jan 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:05:57AM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
jed-sl-ja is not built anymore (note that it is out of date on
ALL architectures). Does this mean it won't be installed into
woody until someone manually removes jed-sl-ja_0.98.7.j055-2
... it's easier.
Search google for putty, if you need an ssh client for windows.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: [EMAIL
On Sun 07 Jan 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Search google for putty, if you need an ssh client for windows.
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/ (hmm, I appear to
have that memorized - I end up grabbing it any time I'm at a public
Windows
is.
So fix the FM if the way it works has changed. Perhaps even give an
error if charset is defined, as it apparently isn't used anymore.
Paul Slootman
On Wed 02 May 2001, Marco d'Itri wrote:
close 95975
I disagree about whether the bug is closed, as you forget to notice
parts of my message. However, I don't feel like petty BTS games (*)
On May 02, Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I should now set en environment variable to get
. Both dig and host are too noisy
for me, although I won't hesitate to use them when I need their specific
functionality.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
supported in mutt, mutt should use that to
override an absence of any locale settings (as it in fact did in the
past, effectively).
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/
debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED
be made locally or over the network (using ssh).
A proposed version can be downloaded with the following lines in sources.list:
deb http://www.wurtel.net local main
deb-src http://www.wurtel.net local main
Paul Slootman
.
It may be necessary to hijack his packages if he is in fact MIA.
A search on Google doesn't show any recent activity either.
Paul Slootman
pgpBUYYSNPpCQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
2.9.29-0.1 is accepted.
I also needed to upload libsnmp-session-perl 0.95-0.1 as the new mrtg
depends on this 0.93 or higher (only 0.90 was available), and MJ is also
the maintainer for this package.
Paul Slootman
.
As in penny wise, pound foolish ? :-)
(I love proverbs, there's one to prove anything.)
Paul Slootman
information
out of netflow data
(Include the long description here.)
You might have made the effort of filling in the fields; I can't believe
the version is x.y.z, the upstream author is Name [EMAIL PROTECTED],
etc. Especially the license...
Paul Slootman
trying to get across).
Perhaps a separate, concise message to debian-devel-announce?
Paul Slootman
are tiny).
Paul Slootman
1 - 100 of 290 matches
Mail list logo
