Re: Request to join the Debian Documentation Project group

Hi Jefferson, On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:24:02PM +, Debian GitLab wrote: > > Jefferson Carneiro (https://salsa.debian.org/oslackjeff) requested Developer > access to the Debian Documentation Project group. > > https://salsa.debian.org/groups/ddp-team/-/group_members I've seen your nice

wiki.debian.org / Re: Any discussion of replacing MoinMoin?

Hi Franklin, Thanks for your interest. On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 10:07:00PM +, Franklin Yu wrote: > > MoinMoin, the wiki software backing the Debian Wiki, has suffered from slow > development recently; the latest release is in 2020, and it is written in > Python > 2.7. The Python 3.5 support

Re: Bug#1035710: unblock: doc-debian/11.3

On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 04:21:47PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2023-05-14 06:47:18 +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > reopen 1035710 > > retitle 1035710 unblock: doc-debian/11.3 > > thanks > > > > Please unblock package doc-debian > > &g

Re: help with doc-debian package

Hi, On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 01:48:42PM -0600, jathan wrote: > On 17/02/2023 00:57, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:58:48AM -0600, jathan wrote: > > > On 14/02/2023 23:11, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 07:38:

Re: help with doc-debian package

Hi, On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:58:48AM -0600, jathan wrote: > On 14/02/2023 23:11, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 07:38:39PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > > On Tue 14 Feb 2023 at 02:32PM +01, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > > > > > &

Re: help with doc-debian package

Hi, On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 07:38:39PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Tue 14 Feb 2023 at 02:32PM +01, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > > I believe Sean didn't get to it yet. Maybe the two of you can coordinate? > > I have a bit of a backlog. I'll have to withdraw my offer

Re: help with doc-debian package

Hi Jathan, Sorry, I only now see your reply... Thanks a lot for your offer to help! On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 06:42:18PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > Hi Sean, > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 09:45:15AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > On Wed 01 Feb 2023 at 08:38PM +01, Joost van

Re: help with doc-debian package

Hi Osamu e.a., On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 11:37:50AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 09:45 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > On Wed 01 Feb 2023 at 08:38PM +01, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > > > > > FWIW: our beloved doc-debian [1] package, which ships stuf

Re: help with doc-debian package

Hi Sean, On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 09:45:15AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Wed 01 Feb 2023 at 08:38PM +01, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > > > FWIW: our beloved doc-debian [1] package, which ships stuff like > > /usr/share/doc/debian/constitution.txt.gz and > > /

help with doc-debian package

Hiya, FWIW: our beloved doc-debian [1] package, which ships stuff like /usr/share/doc/debian/constitution.txt.gz and /usr/share/doc/debian/social-contract.txt.gz is another one of those old and strange (by-hand stuff @ ftp-master, e.g.) packages in need of some extra care. I don't think I have

Bug#1021709: manpages.debian.org: FAQ is full of deadlinks, incl. to the static assets repo

Hi наб, On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 02:15:56PM +0200, наб wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 01:55:42PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > https://dyn.manpages.debian.org/faq.html redirects here to > > https://manpages.debian.org/bullseye/avr-libc/FAQ.3avr.en.html which I > >

Bug#1021709: manpages.debian.org: FAQ is full of deadlinks, incl. to the static assets repo

Hi наб, Thanks for your report! On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 01:26:24PM +0200, наб wrote: > Package: manpages.debian.org > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > https://dyn.manpages.debian.org/faq.html: > source code: >

Re: Question about where to start

Hi Reinaldo, Thank you for your interest in debian-doc and translation work. On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 10:43:19PM +0200, reinaldoplace...@tutanota.com wrote: > Hello folks. My name is Reinaldo Espinosa, I'm from Cuba, I'm writing here > because I will like to contribute to Debian Documentation and

Re: Bullseye release date in Debian history

Hi sebul, On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 04:19:52PM +0900, sebul wrote: > > https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/project-history/-/edit/master/project-history.en.dbk > says at Line 490 > > Debian 11 Bullseye (no release date yet): named for > Woody's wooden toyhorse that appeared in Toy Story 2. > > >

Re: Untranslated part of debian history korean.

Hi Sebul, You might want to report this as a wishlist bug for the debian-history package. Thanks, Bye, Joost On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 06:19:08PM +0900, sebul wrote: > -- Forwarded message - > 보낸사람: sebul > Date: 2022년 5월 18일 (수) 18:54 > Subject: Untranslated part of debian

Re: debian-faq in NEW - or: remove documentation from the archive at all

Hi, On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 07:54:47AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, 2022-04-04 at 20:52 +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > > Maybe in a next upload of debian-faq, we could get rid of this by-hand > > stuff. > > Afaik it's only used to get the FAQ conten

Re: debian-faq in NEW - or: remove documentation from the archive at all

Hi, Samuel Thibault schreef op maandag 4 april 2022: > the byhand queue is quite different from the new > queue, possibly there are very few ftpmaster who actually know how to > process it. Maybe in a next upload of debian-faq, we could get rid of this by-hand stuff. Afaik it's only used to get

Re: Can we make use of Season of Docs by Google Inc

Hi abhijith, Thanks for reaching out to debian-doc. I agree Season of Docs migth be useful for Debian. I think one of the first things we should organize in the 3 days left, is: - Have community members willing to help recruit, evaluate, and onboard a technical writer, and who would be

Re: info2www and/or encourage more html documentation

Hi Diane, On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 02:24:37PM -0700, Diane Trout wrote: > > I noticed info2www fell out of testing a while back, but has been > abandoned upstream and doesn't look maintained in Debian. > > Do people think it's worth trying to keep it alive? > > I was willing to salvage it and

problem with systemctl suspend [german] (was: Re: Release Notes)

Hallo Andy, On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 12:42:21AM +0100, andy wrote to debian-doc@lists.debian.org: > > Systemctl suspend funktioniert nicht richtig, wenn ich > > systemctl suspend > > im Terminal eingebe fährt der Rechner herunter aber beim Neustart bleibt > der Bildschirm schwarz was kann ich

Re: release date on website with notes

Hi Jeremy, On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 07:08:07AM -0500, Jeremy Brown wrote: > > My computer has had a number of malware incidents, so I am taking extra > precautions. This morning I got an update notification about my os. Is > there somewhere I can get notices directly from the debian website with

Re: Bug#998160: Stop using /usr/share/doc/debian

On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 03:08:42PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Source: debian-faq > Version: 10.1 > Severity: minor > > When DDP was started, those people had big plan. But in reality, scope > has been scaled back. > > Since there is no big pile of Debian document and most (Policy, > DevRef,...)

debian-faq: remove obsolete usenet links / Re: Debian FAQ Usenet newsgroup

Package: debian-faq Severity: normal Hi Sebul, On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 05:07:34AM +0900, sebul / https://sebuls.blogspot.kr wrote: > Hello. > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/support.en.html#s12.2.5 > 12.2.5. Usenet newsgroups > say Linux Online and LinuxJournal > But these links

Re: debian-faq korean translation

Hi Sebul, Wow! That's an impressive amount of work, thanks for that! The translation is not complete yet, did I see that correctly? (Hrm... maybe it is complete enough to ship it anyway, improvements can also come after the first public release of this translation.) And I saw you also changed

debian-faq: remove links to obsolete user help forums (was: Re: Is debianHELP correct ?)

Package: debian-faq Severity: normal Tags: +patch Reporting this as a bug so it won't get lost. Sebul and Justin B Rye: thanks a lot! Bye, Joost On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 09:38:41AM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote: > Sebul wrote: > > Please see > >

current Debian stable release and debian-faq / Re: Latest version of Debian

Hi sebul, On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 02:52:07AM +0900, sebul wrote: > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/getting-debian.en.html#version > says release 10, a.k.a. the `stable' distribution or buster But, now release > 11 bullseye is stable. Update please. This has been fixed in our git

Re: Bug#993819: release-notes: Please document the removal of wicd

Hi, On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 05:23:45PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 10:01:10PM +0100, Roger Lynn wrote: > > Package: release-notes > > Severity: important > > > > Please document the removal of wicd in Bullseye. This seems particularly > > dangerous if the upgrade is

Bug#991781: RFR: fail2ban can't send e-mail using mail from bsd-mailx

Hi, I've fixed a typo in the patch: s/provide/provider/ , patch below adjusted. Also, it's not clear to me wether one should do e.g. sudo update-alternatives --config mail and select mail.mailutils, or would it be easier/better to edit files in /etc/fail2ban/action.d/ ? But indeed, otoh,

Bug#991688: mention improved/added man page translations

rchive. Justin: is that proper English? If so, the complete text to include in the introductory section for 2.2 "What's new in the distribution?"... would be (Justin B Rye, Helge Kreutzmann, Joost van Baal-Ilić): The manual pages for several projects such as systemd, util-linux, OpenSSH, and Mutt

Bug#991688: mention improved/added man page translations

Hi again Helge, On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 02:39:02PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 12:27:25PM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote: > > Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > > > Please install manpages-nn (where nn is your language code) to > > > benefit from the improvements.

Bug#991688: mention improved/added man page translations

Hi, Helge: thanks! On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 12:17:15PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Package: release-notes > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > The man pages for nonenglish speaking users have been substantially > improved and extended. Please add a text along the following lines: > > The

Re: Constitution A.6 - "V(A,D) is strictly great"

Hi Laura, Last uploader of doc-debian here. On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 06:45:47PM +0200, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > > I have changed the constitution files in the website repo to match the > updated text currently now in doc-debian package: > >

Bug#841666: release-notes: recommend installing usrmerge on upgrade to stretch

On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:52:11AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 at 22:38, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > > > On Feb 27, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > > > > Due to systemd changes, currently usrmerge requires a reboot to > > > > complete. > > > > To lower support load on

Re: Request ddp-team Project in Salsa

Hi Sergio, On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 05:52:56PM +, Sergio Moraes wrote: > > I've requested access to the ddp-project repo a few minutes ago (username: > sergiomoraes). > > I have experience as a Knowledge and Content Management Specialist and I'd > like to contribute to Debian's Documentation

Bug#976238: release-notes: Please mention that NSS NIS/NIS+ support has been moved to separate packages

Hi, Thomas: Thanks for adding this information, it does sound serious enough. A draft text or patch for https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/blob/master/en/issues.dbk under "Package specific issues" would be needed. (I myself lack the time now.) HTH, Joost

Re: UpgradingToBuster

Hi Geoff, On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 06:05:39PM +0100, Geoff Kaniuk wrote: > > > I know that you do not want multiple bug reports covering different topics > or packages, but since these are all release-notes related, should I include > them in just one report? In general, it's best to submit

Re: X Resources for emacs

Indeed I overstepped. I am sorry.

Re: X Resources for emacs

Hi Bob, Thanks for reporting your issue. The discussion ideally takes place on the debian-user list. Cc-ed. Thanks, Bye, Joost On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 01:33:44PM -0400, Bob Bernstein wrote: > I very glad to have debiandoc-sgml (which I have loved for > years) playing quite nicely with psgml

Re: Bug#612993: Converted debian-faq to DocBook

Hi again, On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 10:39:17PM +0200, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: > Am 07.07.19 um 14:56 schrieb Javier Fernandez-Sanguino: > > Thank you very much for your work on this Tobias. With the new buster > > release we have to upload some content changes (and bump the version to > >

Re: buster and the release notes

On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 10:01:23PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > 5) in whats-new.dbk there isn't much exiting for buster. Don't we have > nice new things? inspired by https://itsfoss.com/debian-10-buster/ by Shirish: AppArmor Enabled by Default https://wiki.debian.org/AppArmor/HowToUse

debian-doc policy / Re: ping and new proposal

On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 09:17:13PM +0200, Thomas Lange wrote: > > > My proposal to list these items on /doc: > > Manual licenses comply with DFSG > We use Docbook XML for our documents > The sources should be at https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team > www.debian.org/doc/ will be

Re: and translations / Re: micronews / dpn / Re: Somes updates on flyers page

Hi, [Adding debian-doc@lists.debian.org to Cc] On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 08:15:37AM +0200, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > El 3 de abril de 2019 5:03:18 CEST, "Joost van Baal-Ilić" > escribió: > >On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 12:14:06AM +0200, Alban Vidal wrote: > >> Le 02/

Re: Binary compatibility and Debian updates

Hi Jakob, On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:36:10PM -0700, Jakob Leben wrote: > > I have not been able to find clear information about Debian policies for > binary > compatibility between point releases and security updates. In essence, I would > like to know whether the binary interface of dynamic ELF

Re: I took liberty to update po for debian-faq

Hi Beatrice, On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 04:33:40PM +0100, Beatrice Torracca wrote: > > > > In case I made the wrong move, please tell me if I should not do this > > > again, or if I need to revert the changes (or keep them only for > > > Italian). > > > > It looks fine to me; thanks! I've just

Re: I took liberty to update po for debian-faq

Hi Beatrice, On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 12:11:28PM +0100, Beatrice Torracca wrote: > > In the debian-faq repo the original version has been updated several > times, but the .pot and .po files (and the corresponding translations, > I imagine) were stuck at 2017 (IIRC). > > Having commit rights on

Bug#841666: release-notes: recommend installing usrmerge on upgrade to stretch

Hi, On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 01:52:26PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:22:04 +0100 Ansgar wrote: > > A minor clarification: > > > > Installing usrmerge on upgrades should probably not be recommended for > > environments used to build packages. This matches debootstrap's > >

Bug#922673: doc/user-manuals: debian-faq: please add new Dutch translation (was: Bug#881647)

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: patch, l10n X-Debbugs-CC: debian-doc@lists.debian.org Hi, We currently have the dutch translation of the Debian FAQ available at https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/index.nl.html . However, it is not listed at

Re: Status of debian-faq

Hi, On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 02:13:14PM +0100, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: > > the package "debian-faq" has been uploaded three months ago and contains > various important fixes. It's currently stuck in BYHAND. > > Is there any chance that we can get this package into buster? and feb 15 it got

Re: Bug#871105: Status of debian-faq

Hi Tobias, On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:18:41PM +0100, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: > Am 10.01.2019 um 06:46 schrieb Joost van Baal-Ilić: > > Saw you've uploaded "byhand: 9.0" on november 17, great! Upload is now > > displayed at https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html.

Re: Bug#871105: Status of debian-faq

Hi again Tobias, On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 09:53:30AM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 11:57:03PM +0100, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: > > Am 17.11.2018 um 09:04 schrieb Joost van Baal-Ilić: > > > I plan to work on the Debian FAQ at > > > https://

Re: where could I point to documentation about packaging leaf packages when trying to get a new package into Debian ?

Hi Shirish शिरीष On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 02:41:12PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: > Dear all, > > Do we have some documentation or a diagram which explains how > packaging leaf packages makes it easier for a new biggish package to > enter into Debian ? > > I tried quite a few times yesterday and

Re: Request to join the ddp-team at salsa.d.o

Hi Adriano, On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 08:27:39PM -0300, Adriano Rafael Gomes wrote: > Hi, this is just a follow-up to my request to join the ddp-team at > salsa.d.o. I've worked on translating the refcard and the release-notes to > pt_BR since more than 5 years. I had commit access to the

Re: commit rights on salsa and old svn contrib

Hi, On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 02:00:16PM +0200, Baptiste Jammet wrote: > > I am the actual french translator for several documents in ddp (release > notes, refcard, history) and contributor in some english ones. > Can I have some commit rights in these repos, please ? > My account is

Re: doc-base and examples?

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 09:53:32PM -0700, Diane Trout wrote: > > > I would not register example code in my packages with doc-base. As I > > understand it, doc-base is merely intended to be used to register > > more > > traditional documentation: manuals, faqs, reference documentation, > > etc.

Re: doc-base and examples?

Hi Diane, On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 09:20:50AM -0700, Diane Trout wrote: > > I was wondering if one should be able to register examples (as source > code) with doc-base? > > I.e. I was packaging a python package with sphinx documentation and > have: > > /usr/share/doc/-doc/html (contains all

Re: commit rights on salsa for Debian Refcard, Debian Faq and Debian Release Notes

Hoi Frans, On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 11:39:40PM +0200, Frans Spiesschaert wrote: > > I am the current maintainer of the Dutch translation of the Debian > Refcard, the Debian Faq and the Release Notes. > Can I gain commit rights for those repos on salsa in order to keep > their Dutch translation

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 01:11:40PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2018-05-12 12:16, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > If putting our repos under a "ddp" group means write-access to our repos is > > shared, then I'm in favour of that: it'd save administrative ove

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

Hi, On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 11:18:54AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2018-05-12 09:51, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > Ideally refcard, faq, release-notes, project-history etc. would all be > > standalone git repositories (after possibly being converted from svn to > &

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

Hi, On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 12:41:47AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2018-05-11 10:54, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > Correction: There is even a ddp group, so I'll put it there: > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ddp/refcard > > Oops: ddp is not a group, but an empty repository. Indeed,

Re: Move of DDP SVN repository to Salsa?

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:51:03PM +0200, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > Hello > > El 08/05/18 a las 15:26, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino escribió: > > Dear colleagues, > > > > Is anyone currently working on moving the entire DDP SVN repository from > > Alioth > > to Salsa? > > > > It appears the

Re: Installation

Hi Antonio, On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 10:51:17AM -0600, Antonio Ramos Montiel wrote: > > Is this the right address to ask this type of questions?. No, the debian-doc list is for discussions about documentation in Debian. > How to install my *EPSON STYLUS OFFICE TX300F printer* to my *raspberrypi

Re: #612993 debian-faq: FAQ: Please convert SGML to DocBook XML

Hi Osamu e.a., On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:18:57PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:14:54AM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > > > Yes, we need to finally convert the Debian FAQ from debiandoc to modern > > DocBook > > XML, so that obsolete

Re: debian-faq: notes on systemd obsolete

Hi again Justin e.a., On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:40:54PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:46:50AM +, Justin B Rye wrote: > > Vincent McIntyre wrote: > > > Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > > > +Instead of run

Re: debian-faq: notes on systemd obsolete

Hi Justin, Applied, up to: On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:46:50AM +, Justin B Rye wrote: > Vincent McIntyre wrote: > > Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > > +Instead of runlevels, as used on traditional [...] > > > + > > > +Service file /lib/systemd/rc.local

#612993 debian-faq: FAQ: Please convert SGML to DocBook XML

Hi Osamu, victory e.a., Yes, we need to finally convert the Debian FAQ from debiandoc to modern DocBook XML, so that obsolete debiandoc toolchain can get removed. I just found out that running "debiandoc2dbk debian-faq.sgml" from within an SVN checkout produces pretty neat debian-faq.dbk/*.dbk

Re: debian-faq: notes on systemd obsolete

3AM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: [...] > > Index: customizing.sgml > > === > > --- customizing.sgml(revision 11724) > > +++ customizing.sgml(working copy) > > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ >

Re: debian-faq: notes on systemd obsolete

Hi, On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:04:29PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > Joost van Baal-Ilić <joostvb-debian-doc-2016053...@mdcc.cx> wrote: > > > > Current Debian FAQ in SVN says, in customizing.sgml : > > > > Every distribution seems to have a different boo

Bug#880638: release-notes: Document apt sandbox support [buster]

Hi Niels, Thanks for your bugreport! On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 07:37:12AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > Package: release-notes > Severity: wishlist > > --- News for apt (libapt-pkg5.0 libapt-inst2.0) --- > apt (1.6~alpha1) unstable; urgency=medium > > All methods provided by apt except for

short intro to debian documentation / Re: Outreachy project about improving documentation and website content (Re: Sign up to mentor for Outreachy Round 15)

Hi Keerthana, On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 11:22:05PM +0530, Keerthana Krishnan wrote: > Laura wrote: > > What follows is about the website part, I'm not member of the > > documentation team > > nor am much familiarized with their repos/sources. > > > > I never mentored in Outreachy/GSoC and I think I

Bug#871659: www.debian.org: scripts: Debian GNU/Linux FAQ should not be typesetted on webserver but webserver should use faq .deb (was: Re: [...] Debian Documentation BoF @ DebConf17 [...])

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, Previous, in https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20170806213642.ga17...@beskar.mdcc.cx : On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 11:06:54PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:36:42PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > On Sa

notes from BoF (was: Re: [...] sunday august 6th / Re: Debian Documentation BoF @ DebConf17, Montréal)

Hi, On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 06:38:51PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:06:40PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > > > FYI: I just submitted this proposal for a BoF at DebConf17, after an > > inspirational discussion with W. Mar

tomorrow, sunday august 6th / Re: Debian Documentation BoF @ DebConf17, Montréal

Hi, On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:06:40PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > FYI: I just submitted this proposal for a BoF at DebConf17, after an > inspirational discussion with W. Martin "debacle" Borgert: > > We'll be discussing the state of Debian's Document

Re: wishing minimal doc criteria for debian packages

Hi Christian, On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 09:47:15AM +0200, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote: > On 2017-08-04 17:16 Joost van Baal-Ilić > > So your point is that upstream could do better? But then why are you > > telling this on a Debian list? I guess you should tell upstream, > > righ

Re: wishing minimal doc criteria for debian packages

Hi, On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 04:31:18PM +0200, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote: > > I am sorry for the "tone". It wasn't against "Debian". It is only > because of Upstream. And I think this is a problem with my > none-native-english, too. OK, I see. > > please do submit a bug for that package. > > I

Re: wishing minimal doc criteria for debian packages

Hi c.buhtz, Thanks for your post on the list! On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:58:02PM +0200, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote: > Does no one want to comment this? > > On 2017-07-23 10:16 wrote: > > I am not sure if this list is the right one for this discussion. > > Please point me to the

Debian Documentation BoF @ DebConf17, Montréal

Hi, FYI: I just submitted this proposal for a BoF at DebConf17, after an inspirational discussion with W. Martin "debacle" Borgert: We'll be discussing the state of Debian's Documentation, what we would like it to be (the Arch wiki?), and how to get there. keywords: The Debian Wiki,

www.debian.org: please remove links to obsolete LDP FAQs

Package: www.debian.org Hi, On https://www.debian.org/doc/ we provide a link to The Linux FAQ and to the index of other FAQs maintained by the Linux Documentation Project. These FAQs as published at http://www.tldp.org/FAQ/Linux-FAQ/ haven't been updated for 13 years (since 2004). Please

Bug#860571: release-notes: clarify and document GnuPG transition for stretch

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 08:51:35AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Wed 2017-04-19 04:55:14 +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > > "The upgrade to "modern" GnuPG has been made as smooth as possible by > > offering > > migration scripts. > >

Bug#860571: release-notes: clarify and document GnuPG transition for stretch

Maybe add something like: "The upgrade to "modern" GnuPG has been made as smooth as possible by offering migration scripts. However, beware: The upgrade comes with some subtle differences in GnuPG's interface. See /usr/share/doc/gnupg/README.Debian for more information." Rationale: I'm

could any debian-doc member take care of uploading doc-debian 6.4 from SVN soonish? (was: Re: jfs: [...] Bug#834977: debian-doc: Please update doc-debian to reflect new version of the constitution (1

Hi Javier! On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:44:02PM +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: > On 21 August 2016 at 14:06, Joost van Baal-Ilić < > joostvb-debian-doc-2016082...@mdcc.cx> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 02:01:47PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > >

jfs: could you please upload? (was: Re: Bug#834977: debian-doc: Please update doc-debian to reflect new version of the constitution (1.7))

Hi Javier, On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 02:01:47PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > Thanks for your well documented bug report. I've fixed all mentioned issues > in > doc-debian's SVN. Could you please upload doc-debian 6.4? It's ready in SVN. Thanks, Bye, Joost

refcard moved from svn to git (was: Re: debian-refcard: package upload?)

Hi, On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:55:34AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2016-08-02 00:40, Holger Wansing wrote: > > thanks for the upload! > > > > I have checked all the files, and all looks fine to me. > > Thanks for checking! Everything is now in >

Re: Git for -doc? (was: debian-refcard: package upload?)

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 02:15:38PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2016-07-10 12:36, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Am Sa. Juli 9 12:57:34 2016 GMT+0200 schrieb W. Martin Borgert: > > > I would do, but probably not before the 20th of this month. > > > > That would be perfectly fine for me. > >

debian-faq: notes on systemd obsolete

Hi, Current Debian FAQ in SVN says, in customizing.sgml : Every distribution seems to have a different boot-up method. Tell me about Debian's. Like all Unices, Debian boots up by executing the program init As of this writing, the unstable release for Debian GNU/Linux is replacing

pine (was: Re: debian-faq: patch5 to remove some outdated content)

Hi, On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 08:51:41PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > victory wrote: > > On Tue, 3 May 2016 21:00:48 +0200 > > Holger Wansing wrote: > > > > it says: > > Where is pine? > > Due to its restrictive license, it's in the non-free area. > > > >

Re: LDP still relevant?

Hi, On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 02:05:08AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 01:36:14PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 11:54:58AM +0100, Tom M wrote: > > > > > > The Linux Documentation Project [1] is mentio

Re: LDP still relevant?

Hi, On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 04:53:30PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 11:54:58AM +0100, Tom M wrote: > > > > The Linux Documentation Project [1] is mentioned in Debian's docs, often as > > the > > only source of general GNU/Linux docs. As far as I can see, it is

Re: LDP still relevant?

Hi Tom M, On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 11:54:58AM +0100, Tom M wrote: > > The Linux Documentation Project [1] is mentioned in Debian's docs, often as > the > only source of general GNU/Linux docs. As far as I can see, it is largely an > outdated resource; floppy disks are regularly mentioned, there

Re: debian-faq: Patch4 to change apt-get / apt-cache into apt

Hi, On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 02:20:31PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > Joost van Baal-Ilić <joostvb-debian-doc-2016041...@mdcc.cx> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:06:44PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > > > > now the fourth patch, wh

Re: debian-faq: Patch4 to change apt-get / apt-cache into apt

Hi Holger, On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:06:44PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > > now the fourth patch, which documents the new apt command, as an > alternative for apt-get / apt-cache. > > My approach is, to list both variants in examples, means the old > apt-get command, and the new apt command.

localization vs localisation (was: Re: debian-refcard)

Hi, On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 12:30:34PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > "W. Martin Borgert" wrote: > > On 2016-04-02 21:04, Justin B Rye wrote: > > > I'm still not sure what locale debian-refcard is meant to be > > > using, though. > > > > refcard was originally written in

Re: debian-refcard

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 09:07:21PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi, > > Holger Wansing wrote: > > --- debian/changelog(Revision 11072) > > +++ debian/changelog(Arbeitskopie) > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > > -refcard (5.0.10) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > > +refcard

Re: debian-faq: Patch2 to improve wording or meaning, remove superfluous words, consistentency ...

Hi Holger, On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:20:07PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > [...] > I would appreciate review and comments. Apart from Beatrice and Justin's thoughtfull comments: here are my € 0,02. > Index: faqinfo.sgml > ===

Re: debian-www / debian-doc teams no longer responsive [Was: Re: Bad release in install documentation]

Hi Holger, On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:06:54PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > Joost van Baal-Ilić <joostvb-debian-doc-2016030...@mdcc.cx> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:06:36AM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > Joost van Baal-Ilić <joostvb-debian-doc-2016030.

Re: debian-www / debian-doc teams no longer responsive [Was: Re: Bad release in install documentation]

Hi Holger, On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:06:36AM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > Joost van Baal-Ilić <joostvb-debian-doc-2016030...@mdcc.cx> wrote: > > > > [dropping some CC's] > > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:33:15AM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > > >

Re: debian-www / debian-doc teams no longer responsive [Was: Re: Bad release in install documentation]

Hi Holger, [dropping some CC's] On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:33:15AM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > > As said above, [...] debian-doc seem not very responsive ATM ... What exactly is needed from debian-doc? I don't have time to read this whole thread now. However, if something specific is

Re: Content problem at http://manpages.debian.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/help.html

Hi Richard, On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 07:59:15AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > I have two problems: > 1. Under "Releases" it states "You may download the manpages as > gzip'd tar >archive for private use. A tarball is usually ~100MB big." > >I attempted to download the the tarball for

Re: Inhaltlicher Fehler in Dokumentationsabschnitt 4.4 entdeckt

Hi bitfreak, Ich spreche nur ein bischen deutsch, so I will reply in English. On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 04:33:32AM +0200, bitfreak wrote: > Sehr geehrtes Debian-Dokumentationsteam, > > im /Abschnitt "4.4 Die 3.x-Veröffentlichungen/" wird eine Aussage > gemacht, dass die erste Debconf 2001 und

suggested addition / Re: Discussion about wiki.debian.org/skype

On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 01:59:53PM -0700, Francewhoa wrote: This message is to discuss edits to https://wiki.debian.org/skype All contributors are welcome :) Care to add the output of lintian --pedantic skype*.deb to https://wiki.debian.org/skype ? Currently only output of lintian with default

Re: Problems with building release-notes PDF for Russian

Hi, On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:48:35PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: On 10.06.2015 10:47, Lev Lamberov wrote: 2015-06-10 5:48 GMT+05:00 Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at mailto:prein...@logic.at: On Tue, 09 Jun 2015, Holger Wansing wrote: Looks like serious bug for debiandoc-sgml (or

  1   2   >