Re: Processed: Re: Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable

2020-07-25 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello all,
I resolved the breakage by "apt-get remove libgcc-8-dev". 

This removed noting central to me and allowed the subsequent
"dist-ugprade" to complete.

In the dist-ugprade I noticed two things:
a) All Debconf questions were asked in english, although they should
   be available in my default locale, i.e. de

b) The "dist-upgrade" initially failed:
…
Vormals nicht ausgewähltes Paket python3-sugar3 wird gewählt.
Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../30-python3-sugar3_0.117-1_all.deb ...
Entpacken von python3-sugar3 (0.117-1) ...
dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-q4FnQb/30-python3-sugar3_0.117-1_all.deb (--unpack):
 Versuch, »/usr/bin/sugar-activity-web« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket 
python-sugar3 0.112-3 ist
dpkg-deb: Fehler: »einfügen«-Unterprozess wurde durch Signal (Datenübergabe 
unterbrochen (broken pipe)) getötet
Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../31-libxapian30_1.4.15-1_amd64.deb ...
Entpacken von libxapian30:amd64 (1.4.15-1) über (1.4.11-1) ...
Vormals nicht ausgewähltes Paket python3-xapian wird gewählt.
Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../32-python3-xapian_1.4.15-1+b1_amd64.deb ...
Entpacken von python3-xapian (1.4.15-1+b1) ...
Vormals nicht ausgewähltes Paket python3-carquinyol wird gewählt.
Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../33-python3-carquinyol_0.117-1_amd64.deb ...
Entpacken von python3-carquinyol (0.117-1) ...
dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-q4FnQb/33-python3-carquinyol_0.117-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
 Versuch, »/usr/bin/copy-from-journal« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket 
python-carquinyol 0.112-1 ist
Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../34-sucrose_0.117-3_all.deb ...
Entpacken von sucrose (0.117-3) über (0.112-6) ...
Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von:
 /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-q4FnQb/30-python3-sugar3_0.117-1_all.deb
 /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-q4FnQb/33-python3-carquinyol_0.117-1_amd64.deb

A subsequent "apt-get -f install" fixed this, however.

If you would like to get futher information from me so that other 
users can avoid these problems (especially the first one) please let
me know. Please note, however, that I'm no tracking testing, i.e. the
state is now evolving again.

Greetings

   Helge


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable

2020-07-19 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
reassign 964477 apt
thanks

On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 06:58:33PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2020-07-19 18:48, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Hello Aurelien,
> > sorry for answering late, I was a few days offline.
> > 
> > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 09:45:55PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On 2020-07-07 21:04, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > > > Package: libc6-dev
> > > > Version: 2.28-10
> > > > Severity: important
> > > > 
> > > > Until a few hours ago I run stable. Switching sources to testing and
> > > > then
> > > > apt-get update
> > > > apt-get upgrade
> > > > 
> > > > worked. Now:
> > > > 
> > > > apt-get dist-ugprade tells me the following:
> > > > 
> > > > root@samd:~# LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade
> > > > Reading package lists... Done
> > > > Building dependency tree
> > > > Reading state information... Done
> > > > Calculating upgrade... Error!
> > > > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> > > > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> > > > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> > > > or been moved out of Incoming.
> > > > The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> > > > 
> > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > > >  libc6-dev : Breaks: libgcc-8-dev (< 8.4.0-2~) but 8.3.0-6 is to be 
> > > > installed
> > > > E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be 
> > > > caused by held packages.
> > > 
> > > This break entry is correct, if we remove it gcc-8 will be left
> > > potentially broken after the upgrade. I have no idea how it can be fixed
> > > on the glibc side.
> > 
> > Who would be the best party to fix this? (Sorry, at the moment I don't
> > have a clue what causes this problem).
> 
> I guess apt developers might be able to help there.
> 
> > > > If I try to remove either libc6-dev or libgcc-8-dev then a long list of 
> > > > programms is scheduled for deinstallation, e.g. lots of KDE, okular, 
> > > > libreoffice etc.
> > > 
> > > Have you tried installing gcc-defaults from testing before starting the
> > > upgrade?
> > 
> > I did an upgrade today (dist-upgrade is still broken) and for some
> > strange reason I cannot install gcc-defaults:
> > 
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > Building dependency tree
> > Reading state information... Done
> > E: Unable to locate package gcc-defaults
> > 
> > I also get this in an current (unrelated) sid chroot. Strange.
> 
> Oops sorry. gcc-defaults is the source package. You should try with one
> of the corresponding binary packages, like gcc or g++.

Ok, then this is not another local problem.

However, it does not help. Installing gcc brings in a few packages but
then dist-upgrade fails again the same way. g++ is already at the
latest version.

I reassign this bug to apt as suggested.

Thanks for your support.

Greetings

 Helge


-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable

2020-07-19 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Aurelien,
sorry for answering late, I was a few days offline.

On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 09:45:55PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2020-07-07 21:04, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Package: libc6-dev
> > Version: 2.28-10
> > Severity: important
> > 
> > Until a few hours ago I run stable. Switching sources to testing and
> > then
> > apt-get update
> > apt-get upgrade
> > 
> > worked. Now:
> > 
> > apt-get dist-ugprade tells me the following:
> > 
> > root@samd:~# LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > Building dependency tree
> > Reading state information... Done
> > Calculating upgrade... Error!
> > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> > or been moved out of Incoming.
> > The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> > 
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >  libc6-dev : Breaks: libgcc-8-dev (< 8.4.0-2~) but 8.3.0-6 is to be 
> > installed
> > E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused 
> > by held packages.
> 
> This break entry is correct, if we remove it gcc-8 will be left
> potentially broken after the upgrade. I have no idea how it can be fixed
> on the glibc side.

Who would be the best party to fix this? (Sorry, at the moment I don't
have a clue what causes this problem).

> > If I try to remove either libc6-dev or libgcc-8-dev then a long list of 
> > programms is scheduled for deinstallation, e.g. lots of KDE, okular, 
> > libreoffice etc.
> 
> Have you tried installing gcc-defaults from testing before starting the
> upgrade?

I did an upgrade today (dist-upgrade is still broken) and for some
strange reason I cannot install gcc-defaults:

Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package gcc-defaults

I also get this in an current (unrelated) sid chroot. Strange.

Any help much appreciated (or pointers).

Greetings

  Helge


-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable

2020-07-07 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.28-10
Severity: important

Until a few hours ago I run stable. Switching sources to testing and
then
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade

worked. Now:

apt-get dist-ugprade tells me the following:

root@samd:~# LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Error!
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libc6-dev : Breaks: libgcc-8-dev (< 8.4.0-2~) but 8.3.0-6 is to be installed
E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by 
held packages.

If I try to remove either libc6-dev or libgcc-8-dev then a long list of 
programms is scheduled for deinstallation, e.g. lots of KDE, okular, 
libreoffice etc.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel taint flags: TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to de_DE.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set 
to de_DE.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on:
ii  libc-dev-bin2.28-10
ii  libc6   2.28-10
ii  linux-libc-dev  5.7.6-1

libc6-dev recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libc6-dev suggests:
ii  glibc-doc 2.30-8
ii  manpages-dev  5.07-1

-- no debconf information

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#960783: tzdata: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation

2020-05-16 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Package: tzdata
Version: 2020a-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

Please find the updated German debconf translation for tzdata
attached.

Please place this file in debian/po/ as de.po for your next upload.

If you update your template, please use 
'msgfmt --statistics '
to check the po-files for fuzzy or untranslated strings.

If there are such strings, please contact me so I can update the 
German translation.

Greetings
Helge
# Translation of tzdata debconf templates to German
# Copyright (C) Helge Kreutzmann , 2007, 2008.
# Copyright (C) Holger Wansing , 2010, 2011, 2013, 
2016, 2017.
# This file is distributed under the same license as the tzdata package.
# Holger Wansing , 2019.
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: tzdata 2020a-20a-1\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: tzd...@packages.debian.org\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2020-04-24 21:28+0200\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2020-05-16 17:58+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Holger Wansing \n"
"Language-Team: German \n"
"Language: de\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n"
"X-Generator: Lokalize 2.0\n"

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#. Note to translators:
#. - "Etc" will present users with a list
#. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones
#. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions:
#. EST5, MST7, etc.
#: ../tzdata.templates:1001
msgid "Africa"
msgstr "Afrika"

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#. Note to translators:
#. - "Etc" will present users with a list
#. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones
#. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions:
#. EST5, MST7, etc.
#: ../tzdata.templates:1001
msgid "America"
msgstr "Amerika"

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#. Note to translators:
#. - "Etc" will present users with a list
#. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones
#. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions:
#. EST5, MST7, etc.
#: ../tzdata.templates:1001
msgid "Antarctica"
msgstr "Antarktis"

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#. Note to translators:
#. - "Etc" will present users with a list
#. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones
#. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions:
#. EST5, MST7, etc.
#: ../tzdata.templates:1001
msgid "Australia"
msgstr "Australien"

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#. Note to translators:
#. - "Etc" will present users with a list
#. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones
#. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions:
#. EST5, MST7, etc.
#: ../tzdata.templates:1001
msgid "Arctic"
msgstr "Arktis"

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#. Note to translators:
#. - "Etc" will present users with a list
#. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones
#. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions:
#. EST5, MST7, etc.
#: ../tzdata.templates:1001
msgid "Asia"
msgstr "Asien"

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#. Note to translators:
#. - "Etc" will present users with a list
#. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones
#. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions:
#. EST5, MST7, etc.
#: ../tzdata.templates:1001
msgid "Atlantic"
msgstr "Atlantik"

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#. Note to translators:
#. - "Etc" will present users with a list
#. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones
#. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions:
#. EST5, MST7, etc.
#: ../tzdata.templates:1001
msgid "Europe"
msgstr "Europa"

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#. Note to translators:
#. - "Etc" will present users with a list
#. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones
#. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions:
#. EST5, MST7, etc.
#: ../tzdata.templates:1001
msgid "Indian"
msgstr "Indien"

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#. Note to translators:
#. - "Etc" will present users with a list
#. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones
#. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions:
#. EST5, MST7, etc.
#. Type: select
#. Choices
#. Translators: do not translate underscores. You can use spaces instead.
#: ../tzdata.templates:1001 ../tzdata.templates:13001
msgid "Pacific"
msgstr "Pazifik"

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#. Note to translators:
#. - "Etc" will present users with a list
#. of "GMT+xx&quo

Bug#918455: ETA for upload?

2019-02-24 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Aurelien,
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 06:52:19PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> this German Debconf translation bug has been marked pending for for
> almost a month now. As the freeze is rapdily approaching I would like
> to enquire if (and wehn) an upload for the forthcoming stable is
> intended.

roundabout 7 weeks ago the debconf update was provided. As the hard
freeze is approaching, do you think it is possible to perform another
uplaod (with the translations in #920427, #920598, #923061) in the
next days to ensure propagation to Testing in time?

Thanks!

Greetings

  Helge


-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#921913: locales: character map file `C' not found: No such file or directory

2019-02-22 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Aurelien,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:34:12PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2019-02-21 22:01, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Hello Aurelien,
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 09:14:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On 2019-02-10 08:48, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > > > Package: locales
> > > > Version: 2.28-6
> > > > Severity: minor
> > > > 
> > > > In todays upgrade in my sid chroot I see the following messages
> > > > locales (2.28-6) wird eingerichtet ...
> > > > Generating locales (this might take a while)...
> > > >   de_DE.ISO-8859-1... done
> > > >   de_DE.UTF-8... done
> > > >   en_GB.UTF-8... done
> > > >   en_US.UTF-8... done
> > > >   C.C...[error] character map file `C' not found: No such file or 
> > > > directory
> > > >  done
> > > > Generation complete.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't know if this is new or older or if this poses a problem. I can 
> > > > provide you with mor details if necessary.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > The list of locales to be generated is defined by /etc/locale.gen, it
> > > looks like there is someting wrong there. Could you please send me a
> > > copy of this file?
> > 
> > I attached the file.
> 
> The issue is the "C C" line in that file. Now I have no idea how it
> ended up there, as it's not one of the value offered by default in the
> debconf template. It only appears there if it is found in the
> /etc/locale.gen config file.

This is my built sid chroot, where I'm not tuning anything. I definitly
did not touch this file. 

If it is unreproducible then I can simply fix up the line and you can
close the bug. If you need further information / debugging simply let
me know.

Greetings

  Helge
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#921913: locales: character map file `C' not found: No such file or directory

2019-02-21 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Aurelien,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 09:14:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2019-02-10 08:48, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Package: locales
> > Version: 2.28-6
> > Severity: minor
> > 
> > In todays upgrade in my sid chroot I see the following messages
> > locales (2.28-6) wird eingerichtet ...
> > Generating locales (this might take a while)...
> >   de_DE.ISO-8859-1... done
> >   de_DE.UTF-8... done
> >   en_GB.UTF-8... done
> >   en_US.UTF-8... done
> >   C.C...[error] character map file `C' not found: No such file or directory
> >  done
> > Generation complete.
> > 
> > I don't know if this is new or older or if this poses a problem. I can 
> > provide you with mor details if necessary.
> > 
> 
> The list of locales to be generated is defined by /etc/locale.gen, it
> looks like there is someting wrong there. Could you please send me a
> copy of this file?

I attached the file.

Thanks and Greetings

   Helge
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


locale.gen
Description: GENbank data


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#921913: locales: character map file `C' not found: No such file or directory

2019-02-09 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Package: locales
Version: 2.28-6
Severity: minor

In todays upgrade in my sid chroot I see the following messages
locales (2.28-6) wird eingerichtet ...
Generating locales (this might take a while)...
  de_DE.ISO-8859-1... done
  de_DE.UTF-8... done
  en_GB.UTF-8... done
  en_US.UTF-8... done
  C.C...[error] character map file `C' not found: No such file or directory
 done
Generation complete.

I don't know if this is new or older or if this poses a problem. I can provide 
you with mor details if necessary.

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#918455: ETA for upload?

2019-02-05 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Aurelien,
this German Debconf translation bug has been marked pending for for
almost a month now. As the freeze is rapdily approaching I would like
to enquire if (and wehn) an upload for the forthcoming stable is
intended.

Thanks!

Greetings

  Helge
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#877434: Acknowledgement (glibc: [INTL:de] updated German man page translation)

2019-01-04 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Aurelien,
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 06:33:55PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2019-01-04 15:51, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Hello Aurelien,
> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 08:17:38PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On 2018-12-26 22:00, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > > > Hello Glibc maintainers,
> > > > more than one year ago I submitted the updated German man page
> > > 
> > > Sorry this has been missed, that will be in the next upload.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > > > translation. As the freeze is approaching I (and probably other German
> > > > speaking users) would be very happy if you could include it in your
> > > > package so that it is part of the next stable release.
> > > 
> > > Note that your update only changes some fuzzy strings, so the German
> > > translated files will be unchanged.
> > 
> > Fixing fuzzy strings (i.e. they are not fuzzy anymore) recompletes the
> > German translation. I just checked, everything looks fine. Or are
> 
> My point is that while the fuzzy is removed from the po file, the
> resulting German translation is unchanged as it was already correct.
> Therefore there is no user visible changes.

Oh, I see what you mean. The change was a pure english one - it did
not affect the translation. Therefore the correct action (which could
have been done by you as maintainers as well) was to simply remove the
"fuzzy" marker. The change *is* user visible, however. With the fuzzy
marker, the english string is shown, without the translated (German)
one. 

> > there some other issues (e.g. new strings I missed) which you want to
> > point out?
> 
> No, everything is fine.

Then we can let this rest.

Greetings

  Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#877434: Acknowledgement (glibc: [INTL:de] updated German man page translation)

2019-01-04 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Aurelien,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 08:17:38PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2018-12-26 22:00, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Hello Glibc maintainers,
> > more than one year ago I submitted the updated German man page
> 
> Sorry this has been missed, that will be in the next upload.

Thanks.

> > translation. As the freeze is approaching I (and probably other German
> > speaking users) would be very happy if you could include it in your
> > package so that it is part of the next stable release.
> 
> Note that your update only changes some fuzzy strings, so the German
> translated files will be unchanged.

Fixing fuzzy strings (i.e. they are not fuzzy anymore) recompletes the
German translation. I just checked, everything looks fine. Or are
there some other issues (e.g. new strings I missed) which you want to
point out?

Thanks again for including the update before stable.

Greetings

  Helge


-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#877434: Acknowledgement (glibc: [INTL:de] updated German man page translation)

2018-12-26 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Glibc maintainers,
more than one year ago I submitted the updated German man page
translation. As the freeze is approaching I (and probably other German
speaking users) would be very happy if you could include it in your
package so that it is part of the next stable release.

If there are any issues with the translations please let me know so
that I can fix them.

Thanks and Greetings

Helge  
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Template for from package

2018-11-18 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
reassign 871051 tzdata 2017b-2
thanks

The Debconf translation is not for fookebox, but for tzdata.

(Fookebox already has several submissions for pt translations)
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#877434: glibc: [INTL:de] updated German man page translation

2017-10-01 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Package: glibc
Version: 2.24-17
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

Please find the updated German man page translation for glibc
attached.

If you update your template, please use 
'msgfmt --statistics '
to check the po-files for fuzzy or untranslated strings.

If there are such strings, please contact me so I can update the 
German translation.

Greetings
Helge
# base-config manual page
# Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# Jens Seidel <jenssei...@users.sf.net>, 2005.
# Helge Kreutzmann <deb...@helgefjell.de>, 2013, 2017.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: eglibc 2.24-17\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-10-21 15:29+0200\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2017-10-01 20:46+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Helge Kreutzmann <deb...@helgefjell.de>\n"
"Language-Team: German <debian-l10n-ger...@lists.debian.org>\n"
"Language: de\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"

# type: TH
#. type: TH
#: validlocale.8:1
#, no-wrap
msgid "validlocale"
msgstr "validlocale"

# type: TH
#. type: TH
#: validlocale.8:1
#, no-wrap
msgid "0.1"
msgstr "0.1"

# type: TH
#. type: TH
#: validlocale.8:1
#, no-wrap
msgid "Petter Reinholdtsen"
msgstr "Petter Reinholdtsen"

# type: SH
#. type: SH
#: validlocale.8:2
#, no-wrap
msgid "NAME"
msgstr "NAME"

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:5
msgid "validlocale - Test if a given locale is available"
msgstr "validlocale - Prüfen, ob eine übergebene Locale verfügbar ist"

# type: SH
#. type: SH
#: validlocale.8:5
#, no-wrap
msgid "SYNTAX"
msgstr "SYNTAX"

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:8
msgid "validlocale EIE"
msgstr "validlocale EIE"

# type: SH
#. type: SH
#: validlocale.8:8
#, no-wrap
msgid "DESCRIPTION"
msgstr "BESCHREIBUNG"

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:13
msgid ""
"Test if the locale given as argument is a valid locale.  If it isn't, print "
"on stdout the string to add to /etc/locale.gen to make locale-gen generate "
"the locale (if it exists at all)."
msgstr ""
"Überprüft, ob eine als Argument übergebene Locale gültig ist. Falls sie es "
"nicht ist, wird auf der Standardausgabe die Zeichenkette angegeben, die zu /"
"etc/locale.gen hinzugefügt werden muss, damit locale-gen die Locale (falls "
"sie überhaupt existiert) erstellt."

# type: SH
#. type: SH
#: validlocale.8:13
#, no-wrap
msgid "FILES"
msgstr "DATEIEN"

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:16
msgid "I"
msgstr "I"

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:18
msgid "I"
msgstr "I"

# type: SH
#. type: SH
#: validlocale.8:18
#, no-wrap
msgid "ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES"
msgstr "UMGEBUNGSVARIABLEN"

# type: TP
#. type: TP
#: validlocale.8:20
#, no-wrap
msgid "B"
msgstr "B"

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:24
msgid ""
"Which charset to assume if the given locale is missing from the list of "
"supported locales."
msgstr ""
"welcher Zeichensatz angenommen werden soll, falls eine übergebene Locale "
"nicht in der Liste der unterstützten Locale enthalten ist"

# type: SH
#. type: SH
#: validlocale.8:24
#, no-wrap
msgid "EXAMPLES"
msgstr "BEISPIELE"

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:28
msgid ""
"If you give a valid locale as parameter, it outputs a string specifying this "
"on stderr:"
msgstr ""
"Falls Sie eine gültige Locale als Parameter übergeben, wird auf der "
"Standardfehlerausgabe eine Zeichenkette ausgegeben, die diese angibt:"

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:31
msgid "% validlocale C"
msgstr "% validlocale C"

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:33
msgid "locale 'C' valid and available"
msgstr "locale 'C' valid and available"

# type: Plain text
# s/invalid/invalid Locale/
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:37
msgid ""
"When given a invalid (not generated or just nonexistent), it outputs a "
"string on stderr telling that this is an invalid locale, and a string to "
"stdout with the string to add to /etc/locale.gen to have this locale "
"generated:"
msgstr ""
"Wenn eine ungültige (nicht erstellte oder einfach nicht existierende) Locale "
"übergeben wird, wird es eine Zeichenkette auf der Standardfehlerausgabe "
"ausgeben

Bug#877291: glibc: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation

2017-09-30 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Package: glibc
Version: 2.24-17
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

Please find the updated German debconf translation for glibc
attached.

Please place this file in debian/po/ as de.po for your next upload.

If you update your template, please use 
'msgfmt --statistics '
to check the po-files for fuzzy or untranslated strings.

If there are such strings, please contact me so I can update the 
German translation.

Greetings
Helge
# Translation of glibc debconf templates to German
# Copyright (C) Helge Kreutzmann <deb...@helgefjell.de>, 2006-2009, 2011, 2016, 
2017.
# This file is distributed under the same license as the glibc package.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: glibc 2.24-17\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: gl...@packages.debian.org\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2017-06-13 22:11+0200\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2017-09-30 10:35+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Helge Kreutzmann <deb...@helgefjell.de>\n"
"Language-Team: de <debian-l10n-ger...@lists.debian.org>\n"
"Language: German\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Choices
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1001
msgid "All locales"
msgstr "Alle Locales"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002
msgid "Locales to be generated:"
msgstr "Zu generierende Locales (�Standorteinstellungen�):"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002
msgid ""
"Locales are a framework to switch between multiple languages and allow users "
"to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc."
msgstr ""
"Locales ist ein System, um zwischen verschiedenen Sprachen umzuschalten. "
"Benutzer k�nnen damit ihre Sprache, ihr Land, ihren Zeichensatz, ihre "
"Sortierreihenfolge und anderes mehr festlegen."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002
msgid ""
"Please choose which locales to generate. UTF-8 locales should be chosen by "
"default, particularly for new installations. Other character sets may be "
"useful for backwards compatibility with older systems and software."
msgstr ""
"Bitte w�hlen Sie aus, welche Locales erzeugt werden sollen. UTF-8-Locales "
"sollten standardm��ig ausgew�hlt werden, insbesondere f�r neue "
"Installationen. Andere Zeichens�tze k�nnten f�r R�ckkompatibilit�t mit "
"�lteren Systemen und Software n�tzlich sein."

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2001
msgid "None"
msgstr "Keine"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002
msgid "Default locale for the system environment:"
msgstr "Standard-Standorteinstellung f�r die Systemumgebung:"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002
msgid ""
"Many packages in Debian use locales to display text in the correct language "
"for the user. You can choose a default locale for the system from the "
"generated locales."
msgstr ""
"Viele Debian-Pakete benutzen Locales, um Text in der f�r die Benutzer "
"korrekten Sprache anzuzeigen. Sie k�nnen aus den generierten Locales einen "
"Standard f�r Ihr System ausw�hlen."

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002
msgid ""
"This will select the default language for the entire system. If this system "
"is a multi-user system where not all users are able to speak the default "
"language, they will experience difficulties."
msgstr ""
"Bemerkung: Dies w�hlt die Standardsprache f�r das gesamte System. Falls dies "
"ein Mehrbenutzer-System ist und nicht alle Benutzer die Standardsprache "
"sprechen, dann werden diese Schwierigkeiten haben."

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/libc.templates:1001
msgid "Do you want to upgrade glibc now?"
msgstr "M�chten Sie das Upgrade von Glibc jetzt durchf�hren?"

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/libc.templates:1001
msgid ""
"Running services and programs that are using NSS need to be restarted, "
"otherwise they might not be able to do lookup or authentication any more. "
"The installation process is able to restart some services (such as ssh or "
"telnetd), but other programs cannot be restarted automatically. One such "
"program that needs manual stopping and restart after the glibc upgrade by "
"yourself is xdm - because automatic restart might discon

Bug#815697: glibc: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation

2016-02-23 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Package: glibc
Version: 2.21-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

Please find the updated German debconf translation for glibc
attached.

Please place this file in debian/po/ as de.po for your next upload.

If you update your template, please use 
'msgfmt --statistics '
to check the po-files for fuzzy or untranslated strings.

If there are such strings, please contact me so I can update the 
German translation.

Greetings
Helge
# Translation of glibc debconf templates to German
# Copyright (C) Helge Kreutzmann <deb...@helgefjell.de>, 2006-2009, 2011, 2016.
# This file is distributed under the same license as the glibc package.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: glibc 2.21-9\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: gl...@packages.debian.org\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-12-07 14:56+0100\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-02-21 19:48+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Helge Kreutzmann <deb...@helgefjell.de>\n"
"Language-Team: de <debian-l10n-ger...@lists.debian.org>\n"
"Language: German\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Choices
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1001
msgid "All locales"
msgstr "Alle Locales"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002
msgid "Locales to be generated:"
msgstr "Zu generierende Locales (�Standorteinstellungen�):"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002
msgid ""
"Locales are a framework to switch between multiple languages and allow users "
"to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc."
msgstr ""
"Locales ist ein System, um zwischen verschiedenen Sprachen "
"umzuschalten. Benutzer k�nnen damit ihre Sprache, ihr Land, ihren "
"Zeichensatz, ihre Sortierreihenfolge und anderes mehr festlegen."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002
msgid ""
"Please choose which locales to generate. UTF-8 locales should be chosen by "
"default, particularly for new installations. Other character sets may be "
"useful for backwards compatibility with older systems and software."
msgstr ""
"Bitte w�hlen Sie aus, welche Locales erzeugt werden sollen. "
"UTF-8-Locales sollten standardm��ig ausgew�hlt werden, "
"insbesondere f�r neue Installationen. Andere Zeichens�tze k�nnten f�r "
"R�ckkompatibilit�t mit �lteren Systemen und Software n�tzlich sein."

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2001
msgid "None"
msgstr "Keine"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002
msgid "Default locale for the system environment:"
msgstr "Standard-Standorteinstellung f�r die Systemumgebung:"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002
msgid ""
"Many packages in Debian use locales to display text in the correct language "
"for the user. You can choose a default locale for the system from the "
"generated locales."
msgstr ""
"Viele Debian-Pakete benutzen Locales, um Text in der f�r die "
"Benutzer korrekten Sprache anzuzeigen. Sie k�nnen aus den generierten "
"Locales einen Standard f�r Ihr System ausw�hlen."

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002
msgid ""
"This will select the default language for the entire system. If this system "
"is a multi-user system where not all users are able to speak the default "
"language, they will experience difficulties."
msgstr ""
"Bemerkung: Dies w�hlt die Standardsprache f�r das gesamte System. Falls dies "
"ein Mehrbenutzer-System ist und nicht alle Benutzer die Standardsprache "
"sprechen, dann werden diese Schwierigkeiten haben."

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/libc.templates:1001
msgid "Do you want to upgrade glibc now?"
msgstr "M�chten Sie das Upgrade von Glibc jetzt durchf�hren?"

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/libc.templates:1001
msgid ""
"Running services and programs that are using NSS need to be restarted, "
"otherwise they might not be able to do lookup or authentication any more. "
"The installation process is able to restart some services (such as ssh or "
"telnetd), but other programs cannot be restarted automatically. One such "
"program that needs manual stopping and restart after the glibc upgrade by "
"yourself is xdm - because automatic restart might disconnect your active X11

Bug#771295: glibc: [INTL:de] updated German man page translation

2014-11-28 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Package: glibc
Version: 2.19-13
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

Please find the updated German man page translation for glibc
attached.

If you update your template, please use 
'msgfmt --statistics pofile.po'
to check the po-files for fuzzy or untranslated strings.

If there are such strings, please contact me so I can update the 
German translation.

Greetings
Helge
# base-config manual page
# Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# Jens Seidel jenssei...@users.sf.net, 2005.
# Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de, 2013, 2014.
#
msgid 
msgstr 
Project-Id-Version: eglibc 2.19-13\n
POT-Creation-Date: 2014-10-21 15:29+0200\n
PO-Revision-Date: 2014-11-28 11:38+0100\n
Last-Translator: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de\n
Language-Team: German debian-l10n-ger...@lists.debian.org\n
Language: de\n
MIME-Version: 1.0\n
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n

# type: TH
#. type: TH
#: validlocale.8:1
#, no-wrap
msgid validlocale
msgstr validlocale

# type: TH
#. type: TH
#: validlocale.8:1
#, no-wrap
msgid 0.1
msgstr 0.1

# type: TH
#. type: TH
#: validlocale.8:1
#, no-wrap
msgid Petter Reinholdtsen
msgstr Petter Reinholdtsen

# type: SH
#. type: SH
#: validlocale.8:2
#, no-wrap
msgid NAME
msgstr NAME

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:5
msgid validlocale - Test if a given locale is available
msgstr validlocale - Prüfen, ob eine übergebene Locale verfügbar ist

# type: SH
#. type: SH
#: validlocale.8:5
#, no-wrap
msgid SYNTAX
msgstr SYNTAX

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:8
msgid validlocale EltIlocaleEgt
msgstr validlocale EltILocaleEgt

# type: SH
#. type: SH
#: validlocale.8:8
#, no-wrap
msgid DESCRIPTION
msgstr BESCHREIBUNG

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:13
msgid 
Test if the locale given as argument is a valid locale.  If it isn't, print 
on stdout the string to add to /etc/locale.gen to make locale-gen generate 
the locale (if it exists at all).
msgstr 
Überprüft, ob eine als Argument übergebene Locale gültig ist. Falls sie es 
nicht ist, wird auf der Standardausgabe die Zeichenkette angegeben, die zu /
etc/locale.gen hinzugefügt werden muss, damit locale-gen die Locale (falls 
sie überhaupt existiert) erstellt.

# type: SH
#. type: SH
#: validlocale.8:13
#, no-wrap
msgid FILES
msgstr DATEIEN

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:16
msgid I/usr/sbin/validlocale
msgstr I/usr/sbin/validlocale

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:18
msgid I/usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED
msgstr I/usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED

# type: SH
#. type: SH
#: validlocale.8:18
#, no-wrap
msgid ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES
msgstr UMGEBUNGSVARIABLEN

# type: TP
#. type: TP
#: validlocale.8:20
#, no-wrap
msgid BDEFAULTCHARSET
msgstr BDEFAULTCHARSET

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:24
msgid 
Which charset to assume if the given locale is missing from the list of 
supported locales.
msgstr 
welcher Zeichensatz angenommen werden soll, falls eine übergebene Locale 
nicht in der Liste der unterstützten Locale enthalten ist

# type: SH
#. type: SH
#: validlocale.8:24
#, no-wrap
msgid EXAMPLES
msgstr BEISPIELE

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:28
msgid 
If you give a valid locale as parameter, it outputs a string specifying this 
on stderr:
msgstr 
Falls Sie eine gültige Locale als Parameter übergeben, wird auf der 
Standardfehlerausgabe eine Zeichenkette ausgegeben, die diese angibt:

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:31
msgid % validlocale C
msgstr % validlocale C

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:33
msgid locale 'C' valid and available
msgstr locale 'C' valid and available

# type: Plain text
# s/invalid/invalid Locale/
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:37
msgid 
When given a invalid (not generated or just nonexistent), it outputs a 
string on stderr telling that this is an invalid locale, and a string to 
stdout with the string to add to /etc/locale.gen to have this locale 
generated:
msgstr 
Wenn eine ungültige (nicht erstellte oder einfach nicht existierende) Locale 
übergeben wird, wird es eine Zeichenkette auf der Standardfehlerausgabe 
ausgeben, die dies mitteilt und eine Zeichenkette auf die Standardausgabe, 
der zu /etc/locale.gen hinzugefügt werden muss, damit die Locale erstellt 
wird:

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:40
msgid % validlocale de_AU@euro
msgstr % validlocale de_AU@euro

#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:42
msgid locale 'de_AU@euro' not available
msgstr locale 'de_AU@euro' not available

#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:44
msgid de_AU@euro ISO-8859-15
msgstr de_AU@euro ISO-8859-15

# type: SH
#. type: SH
#: validlocale.8:44
#, no-wrap
msgid AUTHORS
msgstr AUTOREN

# type: Plain text
#. type: Plain text
#: validlocale.8:47
msgid Petter Reinholdtsen Eltp...@hungry.comegt
msgstr Petter Reinholdtsen Eltp...@hungry.comegt

# type: SH
#. type

Bug#717979: Info received (Inclusion of German man page translation possible?)

2014-10-02 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
is there a chance to update the German man page as provided in this
bug report?

Thanks a lot!

Greetings

  Helge
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#717979: Inclusion of German man page translation possible?

2014-09-20 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello GNU Libc Maintainers,
a German translation of the man page was prepared and filed as
717979. Would it be possible to do a maintainer upload targetting
jessi with the translation included?

Thanks!

Greetings

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-07-13 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Keld,
I was told that this e-mail address is the successor to the (no longer
working) one keld.simon...@dkuug.dk. If that is not the case please 
accept my apologizes (and maybe you know the correct current contact 
details in that case?).


You are listed as contact person/author of the following locales:
da_DK de_BE de_CH de_LU el_GR en_AU en_CA en_DK en_GB en_IE en_NZ
es_AR es_BO es_CL es_CO es_DO es_EC es_ES es_GT es_HN es_MX es_PA
es_PE es_PY es_SV es_US es_UY es_VE eu_ES fi_FI fo_FO fr_BE fr_CA
fr_CH fr_LU he_IL it_CH iw_IL kl_GL nl_BE nl_NL pl_PL POSIX pt_BR
pt_PT ru_RU sv_FI sv_SE hu_HU ro_RO tr_TR

These locales come with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these
locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great 
loss.
(Currently they are allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question:

Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license, e.g.
(L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact
me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-07-13 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Keld,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:25:02PM +0200, k...@keldix.com wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:20:29AM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
  These locales come with a statement
  
  % Distribution and use is free, also
  % for commercial purposes.
  
  Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
  statement was meant as a license.
 
 They were meant as a licence
 
  Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license, e.g.
  (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?
 
 I am willing to release them under GPL v2 - This hereby granted.

Thanks for the clarification and for your work on the locales.

Greetings

 Helge
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Contact data for Keld Simonsen (ISO PDTR 14652/ISO/IEC 14651)

2012-07-12 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Dear Ladies and Sirs,
I'm working for the Debian organisation and try to clarify some
software license issues. One person heavily involved is Keld Simonsen:

% Address: Kollegievej 6
%DK-2920 Charlottenlund, Danmark
% Contact: Keld Simonsen
% Email: keld.simon...@dkuug.dk

(alterantively also Sankt Jorgens Alle 8, DK-1615 Kobenhavn V,
Danmark). 

I cannot reach him under the given e-mail address, do you have a more
recent / working one? He is (was) most likely active in the Danish
mirror committe for ISO/IEC JTC1/SC 2.

Thank you very much!

Best regards

 Helge Kreutzmann

P.S. If you need more background for my inquery, do not hesitate to
 read this at
 http://bugs.debian.org/555168

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-07-04 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Pablo,
according to [1] both e-mail addresses are more recent ones from the
former pa...@mandrakesoft.com, pa...@mandriva.com. If that is not the
case please accept my apologizes (and maybe you know the correct
current contact details in that case?).

You are listed as contact person/author of the following locale(s):

az_AZ ber_DZ ber_MA fur_IT ha_NG ig_NG ik_CA iu_CA sc_IT ug_CN
vi_VN wa_BE yo_NG br_FR bs_BA cy_GB fil_PH hy_AM ku_TR mi_NZ
pap_AN tg_TJ tk_TM tl_PH tt_RU ur_PK uz_UZ uz_UZ@cyrillic yi_US

These locales come with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

Further the following locales only have a part of the above statement:
fy_DE li_BE li_NL nds_DE nds_NL

Finally, the following ones have no statement at all:
dz_BT iso14651_t1_common mt_MT sq_AL


As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these
locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great 
loss.
(Currently they are allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question:

Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license, e.g.
(L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact
me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168#566

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-07-02 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Shehzad,
thanks for your answer. Just to make sure I understand you correctly:
The license (L)GPL v2 or higher is fine for you, correct?

Also thanks for the new address of Pablo, unfortunately, it also does
not work.

Greetings

Helge

On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:56:55PM +0100, Shehzad Ali wrote:
 Hello Dr. Kreutzmann
 
 I have absolutely no objections to the statement being modified to allow for 
 modification and re-licensed. Pablo contacted me for help so I have included 
 his updated e-mail in the reply too. As long as the locale can be updated, 
 modified and distributed freely for the benefit of everyone I have no 
 objections :)
  If you require anything else from me please do not hesitate to ask.
 
 Regards
 Shehzad
 
  Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:22:30 +0200
  From: deb...@helgefjell.de
  To: shehzadas...@hotmail.com; pa...@mandrakesoft.com
  CC: 555...@bugs.debian.org
  Subject: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
  
  Hello,
  you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:
  
  ur_PK
  
  This locale comes with a statement
  
  % Distribution and use is free, also
  % for commercial purposes.
  
  Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
  statement was meant as a license.
  
  As discussed in
  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
  locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
  great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).
  
  To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
  question:
  
  Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
  e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?
  
  If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
  contact me (via the reply-to address set).
  
  Thanks for helping to resolve this!
  
  Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-07-02 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Shehzad,
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:49:50PM +, Shehzad Ali  wrote:
 Yes, the license (L)GPL v2 or higher is fine for me. 

Thanks.

  Pablo works at Mandriva now according to his LinkedIn profile. Their is 
 another e-mail on his website. Would you like me to find that for you?

That would be great if you could find out that other e-mail address,
this would help a lot!

Thank you

Helge

 
 Regards
 Shehzad
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:36:08 
 To: shehzadas...@hotmail.com
 Cc: pa...@mandrakesoft.com; pa...@mandriva.com; shehzadas...@yahoo.com; 
 555...@bugs.debian.org
 Subject: Re: Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales
  provided by you
 
 
 Hello Shehzad,
 thanks for your answer. Just to make sure I understand you correctly:
 The license (L)GPL v2 or higher is fine for you, correct?
 
 Also thanks for the new address of Pablo, unfortunately, it also does
 not work.
 
 Greetings
 
     Helge
 
 On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:56:55PM +0100, Shehzad Ali wrote:
  Hello Dr. Kreutzmann
  
  I have absolutely no objections to the statement being modified to allow 
  for modification and re-licensed. Pablo contacted me for help so I have 
  included his updated e-mail in the reply too. As long as the locale can be 
  updated, modified and distributed freely for the benefit of everyone I have 
  no objections :)
   If you require anything else from me please do not hesitate to ask.
  
  Regards
  Shehzad
  
   Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:22:30 +0200
   From: deb...@helgefjell.de
   To: shehzadas...@hotmail.com; pa...@mandrakesoft.com
   CC: 555...@bugs.debian.org
   Subject: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
   
   Hello,
   you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:
   
   ur_PK
   
   This locale comes with a statement
   
   % Distribution and use is free, also
   % for commercial purposes.
   
   Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
   statement was meant as a license.
   
   As discussed in
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
   locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
   great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).
   
   To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
   question:
   
   Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
   e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?
   
   If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
   contact me (via the reply-to address set).
   
   Thanks for helping to resolve this!
   
   Helge
 
 -- 
   Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
    Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
     64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
    Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/
 

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-07-01 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

yi_US

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-30 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

uk_UA

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-30 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

ur_PK

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-30 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

uz_UZ

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-30 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

uz_UZ@cyrillic

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-29 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

tg_TJ

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-29 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

tk_TM

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-29 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

tl_PH

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-29 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

tr_CY

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-29 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

tr_TR

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-29 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

tt_RU

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-29 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

tt_RU@iqtelif

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-28 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

se_NO

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-28 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

shs_CA

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-28 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

sk_SK

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-28 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

sl_SI

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-27 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello A S Alam,
thanks for your reply, and no, you did not miss anything, the e-mail
was kindly quickly directed to you (by bubulle).

Did you also do the locale file for pa_IN (e-mail address
amanli...@netscape.net)?

From your reply I assume GNU General Public License V2 or later is
fine for both files?

Thanks again!

Best regards

  Helge

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:24:36AM +0530, A S Alam wrote:
 I am really sorry if I missed mail earlier.
 
 I am fully agree with any changes in locale file, whichever you think
 is more suitable free software license. As I am not expert for
 liceneses, while you people can provide better choice to keep
 software free. All my contribution for open source should be
 available as free software and though should be part of debian.
 
 Please let me know if anything I need to do other than this.
 
 Amanpreet Singh Alam
 
 ਬੁੱਧਵਾਰ 27 ਜੂਨ 2012 10:58 ਸਵੇਰੇ ਨੂੰ, 
 Christian PERRIER ਨੇ ਲਿਖਿਆ:
 Amanpreet Singh Alam is also using alternate addresses, which I also
 CCto this mail to get better chances he sees it.
 
 To A S Alam, could you address the below question about the Punjabi
 locale (this is pa_PK as it seems that pa_IN doesn't have the
 offending sentence included).
 
 Quoting Helge Kreutzmann (deb...@helgefjell.de):
 Hello,
 you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:
 
 pa_PK
 
 This locale comes with a statement
 
 % Distribution and use is free, also
 % for commercial purposes.
 
 Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
 statement was meant as a license.
 
 As discussed in
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
 locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
 great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).
 
 To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
 question:
 
 Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
 e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?
 
 If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
 contact me (via the reply-to address set).
 
 Thanks for helping to resolve this!
 
  Helge
 
 -- 
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
 Dipl.-Phys.   
  http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
  64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
 Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 A S Alam
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 To unsubscribe, send mail to 555168-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org.

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-27 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

ro_RO

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-27 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

ru_UA

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

--
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-26 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

pa_PK

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-21 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

oc_FR

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-20 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

nan_TW@latin

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-20 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

nb_NO

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-19 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

mn_MN

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-19 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

mi_NZ

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-18 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

lg_UG

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-18 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

lt_LT

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-18 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

lv_LV

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-17 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

ka_GE

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-17 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

kk_KZ

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-17 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

ko_KR

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-17 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

ku_TR

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-16 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

id_ID

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-16 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

is_IS

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-15 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

hsb_DE

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-15 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

ht_HT

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-15 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

hu_HU

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-15 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

hy_AM

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: [Traduc] Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-14 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Jean-Philippe,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 02:29:23PM +0200, Jean-Philippe Guérard wrote:
 At that time, the license was not discussed, as we were under the
 impression this file was part of the glibc and distributed under the same
 license.
 
 The original author of this file is Keld Jørn Simonsen.
 
 Provided that Keld Jørn Simonsen agree with this, we would be very happy
 to see this file officially put under a Free license. Using the same
 license as the glibc would be fine for us.

Do you have a working e-mail address of Keld? The one listed in the
files no longer works.

 Hope that helps.

Yes, definitly. Hopefully Keld can be contacted, this would solve many
other problematic locales as well.

Greetings

  Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-13 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

ga_IE

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-13 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

gl_ES

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-12 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

fa_IR

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-12 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

fil_PH

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-12 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

fr_FR

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-11 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

en_ZA

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

Furthermore, several licences have no statement at all, namely:

af_ZA nr_ZA nso_ZA nso_ZA nso_ZA nso_ZA nso_ZA ss_ZA st_ZA ts_ZA tn_ZA
ve_ZA xh_ZA zu_ZA

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense these locales to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-11 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

et_EE

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-10 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Adi,
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 11:43:37PM +0300, Adi Roiban wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I don't know how I ended up as a translator for cv_RU.
 
 Anyway, I agree to release all my work as public license.

Thanks. Just to clarify: you mean public domain?

Greetings

   Helge
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-10 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

dv_MV

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-10 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Dafydd,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 07:09:19PM +0100, Dafydd Harries wrote:
 Indeed, the imaginet.co.uk address is not mine at all.

The file says:
title Welsh language locale for Great Britain
source thanks to Dafydd Tomos (daf...@imaginet.co.uk)

So I assume that (unfortunately) you are not the person who did the
Welsh locale?

Thanks!

Greetings

Helge
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Fwd: Re: Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-09 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
for the record

- Forwarded message from \Schalk W. Cronjé\ ysb...@gmail.com -

 Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 00:39:58 +0100
 From: \Schalk W. Cronjé\ ysb...@gmail.com
 To: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de, dwa...@translate.org.za
 Subject: Re: Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales 
 provided
   by you
 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; af; rv:1.9.2.27) 
 Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/3.1.19
 
 Helge,
 
 Let's see what Dwayne has to say. it might be possible to fix all of my 
 legacy out of all of the locales in one go. I would probably just defer to 
 him in the end.
 
 Regards.
 
 Op 08/06/2012 17:15, het Helge Kreutzmann geskryf:
 Hello Schalk,
 thanks for your quick reply.
 
 On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:23:56AM +0100, Schalk W. Cronjé wrote:
 Absolutely, please remove the text and adjust the license to be the
 same as whatever af_ZA, en_ZA are licensed as nowadays.
 This is not possible: af_ZA has no clause while en_ZA has has the same
 problematic text as en_BW and en_ZW.
 
 The no clause text can be interpreted to be the same license as
 (e)glibc, but if possible an concrete license would be preferable, so
 either LGPL v 2.1 or later or maybe same license than (e)glibc.
 
 
 I have added that text way back in the 90s when the localisation
 effort was just starting in Southern Africa. It is worth a review
 anyway. I have CC'd Dwayne Bailey who coordinated *_ZA locales
 subsequently.
 Thanks. I was going to mail him later for his locales.
 
 Greetings
 
Helge
 

- End forwarded message -

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-09 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Christian,
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 08:23:04AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
 Hello Helge,
 
 Great but tedious work you're doing on locales licences. IIRC, you
 already asked me about those I contributed, right?

Nope, you already told it the bug before I started[1]. I listed all
possibly unclear licenses and their resolution[2]. See [3] and [4] for
an explanation.

 Quoting Tomislav Vujec (tvu...@redhat.com):
 
  I suspect that the only reason that this file references me as a contact is 
  since it was based off Croatian locale that I put together two decades ago. 
  I no longer maintain Croatian locale, but since this one is based off my 
  work that was LGPLd, I believe the same license should apply to it, 
  granting rights for use, distribution and modification according to LGPL.
  
  I hope this helps. Please let me know if there's anything else I'd need to 
  do.
 
 
 The other contributor, namely Pablo Saratxaga, is a well-known name in
 the l10n community. He was (is?) working at Mandrakesoft and doing a
 lot of l10n-related work.

See [5].

 You can very certainly reach him by googling a bit, which is certainly
 worth it as he contributed many locales. Trying to find an alternative
 address to @mandrakesoft.com might be a good idea.

Both e-mail adresses known to me failed (with timeouts). 

My plan is to first send out all e-mails and see what I get. For those
who contributed lots of locales, I collected them in one mail
(unfortunately all e-mail addresses were invalid), currently I'm
working through the remaining list. 

I'm not going for the implicit list unless the author also worked on
the non modify one, at least for now.

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168#20
[2] http://www.helgefjell.de/debianitem.php?name=bug555168language=en
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168#43
[4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168#61
[5] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168#56

Greetings

 Helge

P.S. If you need the full e-mail lists, do not hesitate to ask me; I
 can provide them to you off bug.
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-09 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

cv_RU

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-09 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Tomislav,
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:34:10PM -0400, Tomislav Vujec wrote:
 - Original Message -
  From: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
  
  Hello,
  you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:
  bs_BA
  
 [snip]
  Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
  e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your
  choice?
 
 Helge,
 
 I suspect that the only reason that this file references me as a
 contact is since it was based off Croatian locale that I put
 together two decades ago.  I no longer maintain Croatian locale, but

Correct, it clearly states that:
TODO/bs_BA:% Source: adapted from Croatian locale
TODO/bs_BA:source adapted from Croatian locale

However, the croation one has the same clause.

 since this one is based off my work that was LGPLd, I believe the
 same license should apply to it, granting rights for use,
 distribution and modification according to LGPL.

 I hope this helps. Please let me know if there's anything else I'd need to do.

Definitly. Just for clarity:
So may I note that »LGPGL 2.1 and later« applies to both bs_BA and
hr_HR?

Thanks!

   Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-09 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

cy_GB

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-09 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

csb_PL

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-09 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

cs_CZ

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-09 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

crh_UA

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-09 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

ca_ES

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Fwd: Re: Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-08 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
for the record.

Helge
- Forwarded message from \Schalk W. Cronjé\ ysb...@gmail.com -

 Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:23:56 +0100
 From: \Schalk W. Cronjé\ ysb...@gmail.com
 To: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
 CC: dwa...@translate.org.za
 Subject: Re: Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales 
 provided
   by you
 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; af; rv:1.9.2.27) 
 Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/3.1.19
 
 Absolutely, please remove the text and adjust the license to be the same as 
 whatever af_ZA, en_ZA are licensed as nowadays.
 
 I have added that text way back in the 90s when the localisation effort was 
 just starting in Southern Africa. It is worth a review anyway. I have CC'd 
 Dwayne Bailey who coordinated *_ZA locales
 subsequently.
 
 Regards.
 
 Op 07/06/2012 18:51, het Helge Kreutzmann geskryf:
 Hello,
 you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale(s):
 
 en_BW en_ZW
 
 These locales come with a statement
 
 % Distribution and use is free, also
 % for commercial purposes.
 
 Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
 statement was meant as a license.
 
 As discussed in
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these
 locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
 great loss. (Currently they are allowed pending investigation).
 
 To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
 question:
 
 Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license,
 e.g.  (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?
 
 If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
 contact me (via the reply-to address set).
 
 Thanks for helping to resolve this!
 
  Helge
 
 

- End forwarded message -

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-08 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Schalk,
thanks for your quick reply.

On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:23:56AM +0100, Schalk W. Cronjé wrote:
 Absolutely, please remove the text and adjust the license to be the
 same as whatever af_ZA, en_ZA are licensed as nowadays.

This is not possible: af_ZA has no clause while en_ZA has has the same
problematic text as en_BW and en_ZW.

The no clause text can be interpreted to be the same license as
(e)glibc, but if possible an concrete license would be preferable, so
either LGPL v 2.1 or later or maybe same license than (e)glibc.


 I have added that text way back in the 90s when the localisation
 effort was just starting in Southern Africa. It is worth a review
 anyway. I have CC'd Dwayne Bailey who coordinated *_ZA locales
 subsequently.

Thanks. I was going to mail him later for his locales.

Greetings

  Helge
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-08 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

be_BY

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

--
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-08 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

be_BY@latin

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-08 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

br_FR

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-08 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

bg_BG

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-08 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

bs_BA

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-07 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale(s):

en_BW en_ZW

These locales come with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these
locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently they are allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license,
e.g.  (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Update meaning of table values

2012-06-03 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
I added an additional value for the third column in 
http://www.helgefjell.de/debianitem.php?name=bug555168language=en

For completeness, here are the meaning of the column entires:

The first column is the locale, the second states the status:
implicit - no license given, impllicitly the one of (e)glibc
GPL versionless - license GPL, but no version given
Non-modify - License which does not allow modification
Broken - License which is truncated

The third column states if the author replied so far:
Resolved - The author resolved the license issue
Contact - An initial contact was made
None - No reply to this issue so far
Undeliverable - The e-mail address of the original submitter no longer works
A dash indicates that no contact attempt was made so far

The fourth column states if the license is now ok:
It contains either the name of the license (in green), the word
implicit in blue if the licnese is given implicitly, unclear (in
orange) if the status is unclear or no in red if the license is not
ok.

The final column links to relevant e-mails, if any.

Greetings

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-03 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale(s):

gd_GB gv_GB kw_GB hy_AM ka_GE oc_FR pap_AN yi_US

These locales come with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

Further the following locales only have a part of the above statement:
fy_DE li_BE li_NL nds_DE nds_NL

As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these
locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great 
loss.
(Currently they are allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question:

Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license, e.g.
(L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact
me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-03 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale(s):

fy_DE li_BE li_NL nds_DE nds_NL

These locales come with a statement, which seems to be part of

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
truncated statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these
locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently they are allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-03 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale(s):

sr_ME sr_RS sr_RS@latin

These locales come with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these
locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently they are allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license,
e.g.  (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-05-27 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Keld,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locales:
da_DK de_BE de_CH de_LU el_GR en_AU en_CA en_DK en_GB en_IE en_NZ
es_AR es_BO es_CL es_CO es_DO es_EC es_ES es_GT es_HN es_MX es_PA
es_PE es_PY es_SV es_US es_UY es_VE eu_ES fi_FI fo_FO fr_BE fr_CA
fr_CH fr_LU he_IL it_CH iw_IL kl_GL nl_BE nl_NL pl_PL POSIX pt_BR
pt_PT ru_RU sv_FI sv_SE hu_HU ro_RO tr_TR 

These locales come with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these
locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great 
loss.
(Currently they are allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question:

Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license, e.g.
(L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact
me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-05-27 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Pablo,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale(s):

az_AZ ber_DZ ber_MA fur_IT ha_NG ig_NG ik_CA iu_CA sc_IT ug_CN
vi_VN wa_BE yo_NG br_FR bs_BA cy_GB fil_PH hy_AM ku_TR mi_NZ
pap_AN tg_TJ tk_TM tl_PH tt_RU ur_PK uz_UZ uz_UZ@cyrillic yi_US

These locales come with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

Further the following locales only have a part of the above statement:
fy_DE li_BE li_NL nds_DE nds_NL

Finally, the following ones have no statement at all:
dz_BT iso14651_t1_common mt_MT sq_AL


As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these
locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great 
loss.
(Currently they are allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question:

Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license, e.g.
(L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact
me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

P.S. I assumed that both adresses pooint to the same person, my
appologies if I erred there.
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#555168: Overview of (affected) locales

2012-05-26 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
you can find an overview of the (affected) locales in
http://www.helgefjell.de/debianitem.php?name=bug555168language=en

The first column is the locale, the second states the status:
implicit - no license given, impllicitly the one of (e)glibc
GPL versionless - license GPL, but no version given
Non-modify - License which does not allow modification
Broken - License which is truncated

The third column states if the author replied so far:
Resolved - The author resolved the license issue
Contact - An initial contact was made
None - No reply to this issue so far
A dash indicates that no contact attempt was made so far

The fourth column states if the license is now ok:
It contains either the name of the license (in green), the word
implicit in blue if the licnese is given implicitly, unclear (in
orange) if the status is unclear or no in red if the license is not
ok.

The final column links to relevant e-mails, if any.

Greetings

Helge

P.S. km_KH  lo_LA  th_TH are not included in the list, they have a
 license which seems to be ok.
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#652556: eglibc: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation

2011-12-18 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Package: eglibc
Version: 2.13-22
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

Please find the updated German debconf translation for eglibc
attached.

Please place this file in debian/po/ as de.po for your next upload.

If you update your template, please use 
'msgfmt --statistics pofile.po'
to check the po-files for fuzzy or untranslated strings.

If there are such strings, please contact me so I can update the 
German translation.

Greetings
Helge
# Translation of glibc debconf templates to German
# Copyright (C) Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de, 2006-2009, 2011.
# This file is distributed under the same license as the glibc package.
#
msgid 
msgstr 
Project-Id-Version: glibc 2.13-22\n
Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: egl...@packages.debian.org\n
POT-Creation-Date: 2011-10-30 11:52-0700\n
PO-Revision-Date: 2011-12-13 22:39+0100\n
Last-Translator: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de\n
Language-Team: de debian-l10n-ger...@lists.debian.org\n
Language: German\n
MIME-Version: 1.0\n
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15\n
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n

#. Type: multiselect
#. Choices
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1001
msgid All locales
msgstr Alle Standorteinstellungen

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002
msgid Locales to be generated:
msgstr Zu generierende Standorteinstellungen (�locales�):

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002
msgid 
Locales are a framework to switch between multiple languages and allow users 
to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc.
msgstr 
Standorteinstellungen ist ein System, um zwischen verschiedenen Sprachen 
umzuschalten. Benutzer k�nnen damit ihre Sprache, ihr Land, ihren 
Zeichensatz, ihre Sortierreihenfolge und anderes mehr festlegen.

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002
msgid 
Please choose which locales to generate. UTF-8 locales should be chosen by 
default, particularly for new installations. Other character sets may be 
useful for backwards compatibility with older systems and software.
msgstr 
Bitte w�hlen Sie aus, welche Standorteinstellungen erzeugt werden sollen. 
UTF-8-Standorteinstellungen sollten standardm��ig ausgew�hlt werden, 
insbesondere f�r neue Installationen. Andere Zeichens�tze k�nnten f�r 
R�ckkompatibilit�t mit �lteren Systemen und Software n�tzlich sein.

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2001
msgid None
msgstr Keine

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002
msgid Default locale for the system environment:
msgstr Standard-Standorteinstellung f�r die Systemumgebung?

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002
msgid 
Many packages in Debian use locales to display text in the correct language 
for the user. You can choose a default locale for the system from the 
generated locales.
msgstr 
Viele Debian-Pakete benutzen Standorteinstellungen, um Text in der f�r die 
Benutzer korrekten Sprache anzuzeigen. Sie k�nnen aus den generierten 
Standorteinstellungen einen Standard f�r Ihr System ausw�hlen.

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002
msgid 
This will select the default language for the entire system. If this system 
is a multi-user system where not all users are able to speak the default 
language, they will experience difficulties.
msgstr 
Bemerkung: Dies w�hlt die Standardsprache f�r das gesamte System. Falls dies 
ein Mehrbenutzer-System ist und nicht alle Benutzer die Standardsprache 
sprechen, dann werden diese Schwierigkeiten haben.

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/libc.templates:1001
msgid Do you want to upgrade glibc now?
msgstr M�chten Sie das Upgrade von Glibc jetzt durchf�hren?

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/libc.templates:1001
msgid 
Running services and programs that are using NSS need to be restarted, 
otherwise they might not be able to do lookup or authentication any more. 
The installation process is able to restart some services (such as ssh or 
telnetd), but other programs cannot be restarted automatically. One such 
program that needs manual stopping and restart after the glibc upgrade by 
yourself is xdm - because automatic restart might disconnect your active X11 
sessions.
msgstr 
Laufende Dienste und Programme, die NSS verwenden, m�ssen neu gestartet 
werden, da sie andernfalls keine �berpr�fungen oder Authentisierung mehr 
durchf�hren k�nnen. Der Installationsprozess kann einige Dienste neu starten 
(wie Ssh oder Telnetd), aber andere Programme k�nnen nicht automatisch neu 
gestartet werden. Eines dieser Programme, die nach dem Upgrade von Glibc ein 
manuelles Stoppen und Neustarten ben�tigen ist Xdm, da ein automatischer 
Neustart Sie von Ihren aktiven X11-Sitzung trennen k�nnte.

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/libc.templates:1001
msgid 
This script detected the following installed

  1   2   >