On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.orgwrote:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 21:16 -0500 schrieb Jeremy Shaw:
- A patch that prevents the generation of less than dependencies
so it still tries to build if the dependencies get newer
haskell-devscripts
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Trent W. Buck trentb...@gmail.com wrote:
Kari Pahula k...@debian.org writes:
Though now I'm thinking that it's not generally a good idea to expect
an one to one mapping from cabal names to libghc6-*-dev names anyway,
but better to look at what files you are
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
Jeremy Shaw wrote:
Hello,
Having received no negative feedback, I uploaded the latest version of
cabal-debian to hackage. cabal-debian is part of the debian package
which features:
As you know I do like the
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 07.04.2009, 10:50 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
Joachim, have you uploaded haskell-devscripts? If not, I've done a new
version, without changing the number, since the other one
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Kari Pahula k...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:51:41AM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
Let's make dh_haskell_depends add that dependency from -prof to the
corresponding -dev, instead. Since I was about to update
haskell-devscripts anyway, I'll add
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.orgwrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 28.07.2009, 17:28 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
In the current version of ghc6, 6.10.4-1, the extensible-exceptions
deb packages are in the provided package lists for the compiler
This wouldn't matter if haddock didn't take an incredibly long time for some
of my packages. It used to be that haddock wouldn't run if there was no
binary package with the suffix -doc in the control file, but with the
current haskell-devscripts (or hlibrary.mk?) it seems to run regardless.
I think it was just a local version of hlibrary.mk that had that feature.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:13 PM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
This wouldn't matter if haddock didn't take an incredibly long time for
some of my packages. It used to be that haddock wouldn't run
Attached is my change to support this.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:44 PM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it was just a local version of hlibrary.mk that had that feature.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:13 PM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
This wouldn't matter if haddock didn't take
When I upgrade to a newer version of a package, the old package is not
getting unregistered by ghc-pkg. I believe this is because ghc-pkg update
does not actually unregister the old package, and the ghc-pkg unregister
call in the prerm script is not called during an upgrade, only during a
remove.
The version of hslogger in sid (1.0.8-2) still uses the dh_haskell
script which has been removed from haskell-devscripts.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Trent W. Buck t...@cybersource.com.au wrote:
Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org writes:
1) no hyperlinks,
2) hyperlinks that will be broken unless other -doc packages are
installed, or
3) hyperlinks that are guaranteed not to be broken, because the
other
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org wrote:
David Fox dds...@gmail.com writes:
Give me working links or give me no links at all
Presumably it would be possible to provide links to a common page
explaining the situation if the docs aren't installed? (Like the
man
I know nobody else is using this compiler, but I suspect the issue is
in haskell-devscripts as the error occurs after the compile. It is
quite odd, because there doesn't seem to be anything at all unusual
about the regex-posix package. Every other package I have tried
builds fine (except for
I used the 6.12.1-9 packaging to build 6.13-20091231, so I thought I
should post the changes I made to do it. Some of these are fixes
which I think should go into the 6.12 packaging, in particular
removing the hardcoded version number from ghc6.triggers and restoring
the quilt patching code.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 16.02.2010, 13:41 -0800 schrieb David Fox:
I used the 6.12.1-9 packaging to build 6.13-20091231, so I thought I
should post the changes I made to do it.
Thanks,
Some of these are fixes
which
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Trent W. Buck t...@cybersource.com.au wrote:
David Fox dds...@gmail.com writes:
Ok, I see that this functionality is provided by dpkg version 1.15.5.4
or newer. Ubuntu Karmic uses 1.15.4 while Jaunty uses 1.14.24. I
find it troubling when the Haskell
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.orgwrote:
We can consider though to add -dyn packages as a service for users who
want to locally compile dynamically linked program – just like we
provide the -prof packages at the moment.
Or even include the -dyn library in
Whew, I have to catch up!
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
Hi again,
Am Montag, den 03.05.2010, 11:25 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Hi David,
Am Samstag, den 01.05.2010, 21:47 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
I packaged the ghc package
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:53 AM, David Fox da...@seereason.com wrote:
Whew, I have to catch up!
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.orgwrote:
Hi again,
Am Montag, den 03.05.2010, 11:25 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Hi David,
Am Samstag, den 01.05.2010
Sometimes the Setup build command gets run twice, and in some mysterious
way this causes unresolved symbols when loading a library compiled against a
library to which this has happened, like this:
Loading package syb-with-class-instances-text-0.0.1 ... linking ... done.
ghc:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:33 AM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes the Setup build command gets run twice, and in some mysterious
way this causes unresolved symbols when loading a library compiled against a
library to which this has happened, like this:
Loading package syb
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:31 AM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:33 AM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes the Setup build command gets run twice, and in some mysterious
way this causes unresolved symbols when loading a library compiled against a
library
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.orgwrote:
Hi David,
Am Mittwoch, den 05.05.2010, 05:52 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
I have pushed patches to http://seereason.com/darcs which address all
these issues except the case sensitivity. I will address
I'm getting errors like this from version 1.1.3 of haskell-regex-tdfa which
is now in sid:
Explict error in module Text.Regex.TDFA.NewDFA : compressOrbit,1
reverting to 1.1.2 fixes it. Also, the homepage and the darcs repo given in
the cabal file appear to be out of date.
Homepage:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.orgwrote:
Hi David,
Am Montag, den 19.07.2010, 11:26 +0100 schrieb David Fox:
I'm getting errors like this from version 1.1.3 of haskell-regex-tdfa
which is now in sid:
Explict error in module Text.Regex.TDFA.NewDFA
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.orgwrote:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 26.07.2010, 17:25 +0100 schrieb Chris Kuklewicz:
Version 1.1.3 of regex-tdfa has a bad bug.
The error was something I changed from 1.1.2 to 1.1.3 that was simply
Wrong. It would only trigger
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 06.03.2011, 09:17 -0600 schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
OK, so I'll make an upload with libgmp10-dev providing both libgmp-dev
and libgmp3-dev.
Done: just uploaded gmp_5.0.1+dfsg-6.
Good luck! :-)
-Steve
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 18.04.2011, 12:39 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
Attached is a patch that changes an occurrence of ghc-pkg6 to ghc-pkg.
This led to incorrect binary dependencies in some packages.
well spotted! patched
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo
mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote:
HI all,
Anyone looking at doing that latest version of darcs?
If not, I'll have a stab at it.
Cheers,
Erik
I built it with the attached changes. Implied is the availability of
haskell-tar and haskell-text.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2011, 07:50 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
Excerpts from Iain Lane's message of Qua Jun 01 07:27:28 -0300 2011:
(...)
Where are we with gitit and haskell-debian?
Well, I have
The magic-haskell package does not give libghc-magic-dev a dependency
on libmagic-dev, which I would argue is necessary for the package to
function.
-david
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
I patched the ghc in experimental so it was 7.2.1, but I can't build
the happy deb with it. It gets to Preprocessing executable 'happy'
for happy-1.18.6... and then dies with exit code 127. This was using
an Ubuntu Natty build environment.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:58 PM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
I patched the ghc in experimental so it was 7.2.1, but I can't build
the happy deb with it. It gets to Preprocessing executable 'happy'
for happy-1.18.6... and then dies with exit code 127. This was using
an Ubuntu Natty
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:21 PM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:58 PM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
I patched the ghc in experimental so it was 7.2.1, but I can't build
the happy deb with it. It gets to Preprocessing executable 'happy'
for happy-1.18.6
Can anyone tell me how to increase the stack size when you see this
message from haddock while building a deb:
stack overflow: use -g +RTS -Ksize to increase it
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 04.12.2011, 10:13 +1100 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo:
Maybe someone wants to write a lintian check for this?
The main thing that stop me working on lintian is that its
written in Perl, a
When I try to install ghc-doc I get this message:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
ghc-doc : Depends: 18
Oh, I see, 18 is provided by ghc-haddock.
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:27 AM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
When I try to install ghc-doc I get this message:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
ghc-doc : Depends: 18
Ok, I see - the value for ghc 7.4.0 is supposed to be 704, the value for
ghc 7.0.4 is supposed to be 700.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:38 AM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
Below you can see that the C preprocessor is seeing
-D__GLASGOW_HASKELL__=704 rather than 740 or 741. I actually can't
31.12.2011, 10:31 -0800 schrieb David Fox:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:27 AM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
When I try to install ghc-doc I get this message:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
ghc-doc : Depends: 18
Oh, I see, 18 is provided by ghc
04.01.2012, 08:50 -0800 schrieb David Fox:
In ghc revision 4 the ghc-doc package now depends on
haddock-interface-18, but haddock --interface-version still prints
18 whereas in earlier compilers it printed haddock-interface-16.
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Joachim Breitner
nome
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2011, 20:51 +0100 schrieb Iustin Pop:
I'm asking more from the point of view of upstream, rather than Debian
packaging. I presume that due to the ghc6→ghc migration, doing backports
for a
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Clint Adams cl...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 12:10:32PM +, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
I'm not sure who the intended users of this package might be, so I can't
if they'll understand your package description. But at least have no idea
Recent versions of cabal-debian can be persuaded to create a package
for executables named haskell-foo-utils. I know I use this for
packaging the trhsx binary in hsx.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Ugh, don't use this patch. It causes other packages to fail.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:00 AM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
I encountered a failure whose origins are mysterious but which is fixable
with the attached patch. There are a number of elements that combine to
cause this bug
The real problem is that the notice function in Cabal passes its argument
to a function called wraptext, so when your package name gets very long a
newline is inserted in the message that hlibrary.mk doesn't expect.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:22 PM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
Ugh, don't
I settled on the attached patch, which so far works for all packages. Its
unlikely that this will matter to anyone else, since packages long enough
to trigger this bug have never been encountered.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:28 PM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
The real problem
This changes haddock-interfaces-22 to haddock-interface-22.
diff
Description: Binary data
I will see about changing cabal-debian to do this.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.orgwrote:
Hi,
please be a bit more careful when packaging stuff. The following looks
like it was created with cabal-debian and the result was not manually
checked:
releases.
David Fox
d...@seereason.com
Is there a standard place to put the files that are listed in the
data-files section of a cabal files? I've seen them put into a package
named haskell-mylibrary-utils, so that is what cabal-debian does right now
by default.
I try to incorporate knowledge about packaging haskell into the
cabal-debian package. It is used to debianize all the happstack packages
which we upload to deb.seereason.com.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Michael Alan Dorman
mdor...@ironicdesign.com wrote:
Daniel Silverstone
Yes, I tried to make it backwards compatible, but it is a major rewrite,
and should be much cleverer. If it fails any use cases I am happy to do
what I can.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Michael Alan Dorman
mdor...@ironicdesign.com wrote:
Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org writes:
I
I've just uploaded cabal-debian-3.4,1. Let me know if the build issues
persist. The debian/rules file it ships with is quite simple.
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Giovanni Mascellani g...@debian.org wrote:
Il 25/05/2013 23:19, Giovanni Mascellani ha scritto:
Hi.
Il 25/05/2013 11:38,
I stand ready to make changes to cabal-debian on request.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Clint Adams cl...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 04:41:26PM -0700, Gabriel Gonzalez wrote:
Are there any mostly-automated tools that I should be using or will
this be a manual process?
to make it build with either.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Clint Adams cl...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:06:30AM -0700, David Fox wrote:
I stand ready to make changes to cabal-debian on request.
Is there some reason debian switched to process-listlike
I've uploaded debian-3.79.2 and cabal-debian-3.7 to hackage. The debian
package builds with either process-extras or process-listlike. The new
cabal-debian has a change for the new /usr/share paths generated by
haskell-devscripts-0.8.19.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:54 AM, David Fox dds
I have tried running dpkg-buildpackage on the ghc package uploaded to
experimental and I get the same error from both debian wheezy and ubuntu
precise after 14 meg of build progress messages:
inplace/bin/ghc-cabal copy libraries/template-haskell dist-install
strip
I found the problem - I wasn't specifying that the /proc file system
needs to be mounted during the build.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:49 PM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 11.02.2014, 14:28
It is also necessary to have /proc mounted to run ghc, not just to build it.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:54 PM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
I found the problem - I wasn't specifying that the /proc file system
needs to be mounted during the build.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:49 PM, David Fox
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 17.02.2014, 16:33 -0800 schrieb David Fox:
It is also necessary to have /proc mounted to run ghc, not just to build it.
I think /proc is pretty much a standard requirement these day. If
anything
Worked around by putting these files in debian/ (let’s see if the
ftp-masters agree).
* GHC conflicts with all provided libraries, including
libghc-cabal-dev. We’d probably have to special-case that there
(or remove these conflicts alltogether).
Done.
Cabal and cabal-install
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 09.06.2014, 14:04 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
Excellent! Could we have a similarly modified build of 7.8 in experimental?
just merged these and other changes from unstable to experimental and am
Joachim, is there a procedure for submitting changes to haskell-devscripts?
I have changes to support the building of libraries using ghcjs I'd like
to submit.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 01.07.2014, 15:30 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
Joachim, is there a procedure for submitting changes to
haskell-devscripts? I have changes to support the building of
libraries using ghcjs I'd
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 06:03 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
I believe that these packages should be in the Provides line for the
ghc-doc package:
libghc-binary-doc
libghc-haskeline-doc
libghc-terminfo
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:42 AM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 06:03 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
I believe that these packages should be in the Provides line for the
ghc-doc
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 06:03 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
I believe that these packages should be in the Provides line for the
ghc-doc package:
libghc-binary-doc
libghc-haskeline-doc
libghc-terminfo
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 13:12 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
Either way works for me, it is just that I'm getting build errors
because our builder decides it needs to build those packages and then,
because
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 13:12 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
Either way works for me, it is just that I'm getting build errors
because our builder decides it needs to build those packages and then,
because
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 13.07.2014, 07:50 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 13:12 -0700 schrieb David Fox
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Hi,
We got https://bugs.debian.org/753183 a while ago, and I guess we want
to upload the latest version of cabal-debian. Who of the DHG group uses
this package and would like to prepare an upload? There is a new
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 13.07.2014, 21:54 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
I'm almost certain now that libtinfo-dev should be a dependency of ghc
if it exports terminfo. If so, I apologize in advance - and after
that nice
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:38 AM, David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 13.07.2014, 21:54 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
I'm almost certain now that libtinfo-dev should be a dependency of ghc
On the page
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=pkg-haskell/ghc;a=summary
there is a link to the darcs repository, but it is not valid. What should
it be?
Thanks, I will look into this.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Sven Bartscher
sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de wrote:
Dear maintainer,
We recently dealt with a bug in you package, cabal-debian, about
dependencies not being mapped to lowercase before being added to the
debianization.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:39 AM, David Fox d...@seereason.com wrote:
Thanks, I will look into this.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Sven Bartscher
sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de wrote:
Dear maintainer,
We recently dealt with a bug in you package, cabal-debian, about
dependencies
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 01.07.2014, 15:30 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
Joachim, is there a procedure for submitting changes to
haskell-devscripts? I have changes to support the building of
libraries using ghcjs I'd
That is great news! I think my preference would be to move it to github.com
(I was actually in the process of doing this today - is it ok if I
proceed?) and continue to be the upstream developer - there are some ugly
corners I hope to gradually smooth out. I would hate for anyone to see the
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
* Allow building of documentation when when package has no Haskell modules
✓
* Fix a bash bug in the dev library install recipe
✓
* Remove cases for binary debs in the ghc package - haskell-devscripts is
not a build
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Greetings from Portland,
I should have gone, but I'm not a Debian developer. ;-)
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
If you create the repo there soon I’ll start filing a few issues of
things that I’d do differently (otherwise I’ll use the bts for now and
copy them later, which is fine as well).
No sooner said than done!
Thanks I will look at these soon.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Hi David,
I filed a few more issues at
https://github.com/ddssff/cabal-debian/issues but to not only file
issues, I fixed a few of them.
I didn’t want to push to cabal-debian
I would be a little sad to see the parsing of a debianization go, though
I'm not sure I use that feature in real life. Today I am going to take a
stab at the second option (making it do what we want it to do) and if that
doesn't work I will consider the first option (simplified cabal-debian.) I
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Dmitry Bogatov kact...@gnu.org wrote:
Sounds nice. But HEAD is one commit from 4.19. Maybe package it? I
tried, and it depends on debian-3.85. I `cabal unpack debian` it, and
there is debian/ in it. What should I do with it?
That debianization is my doing -
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Dmitry Bogatov kact...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2015-01-09, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
#. I would prefer section by default `unknown`
I'm adding a --source-section option to version 4.20.
:
* David Fox dds...@gmail.com [2015-01-08 06:20:34-0800]
Also, cabal-debian should be producing library debs, if it isn't there
may
be a bug.
Seems I was not clear enough. I regret, that haskell-cabal-debian
*debian* source package provides only *cabal-debian* binary, without
*libghc
...@weltraumschlangen.de wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:50:43 -0700
David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
We build with the changes in https://github.com/seereason/hsx2hs.git.
That looks good, but it would be better, if there would be a release on
hackage, since our infrastructure builds on building packages from
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 18.03.2015, 14:38 +0100 schrieb Sven Bartscher:
Last year it was brought up, to automate the packaging process
completely and creating the packages out of the package plan.
I didn't follow
It turned out that Jeremy Shaw already had upload rights, and he works for
me. ;-)
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Sven Bartscher
sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de wrote:
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:54:49 -0700
David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I've uploaded hsx2hs-0.13.3 to hackage
Ok, I've uploaded hsx2hs-0.13.3 to hackage, with updated repository path.
GHC-7.10 support is waiting for changes to haskell-src-meta.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Sven Bartscher
sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:50:43 -0700
David Fox dds...@gmail.com wrote
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 28.03.2015, 15:13 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
Right, the ones in https://github.com/seereason/haskell-devscripts are
good.
all applied (but not yet tested).
I wonder how feasible it would
---
Dh_Haskell.sh| 182 +++
Dh_Haskell.sh.orig | 137 +++
dh_haskell_blurbs| 18 +++--
dh_haskell_depends | 25 ---
dh_haskell_extra_depends | 5 +-
dh_haskell_provides | 21
---
Dh_Haskell.sh| 20
Dh_Haskell.sh.orig | 22 +-
dh_haskell_blurbs| 3 +++
dh_haskell_depends | 3 +++
dh_haskell_extra_depends | 3 +++
dh_haskell_provides | 3 +++
dh_haskell_shlibdeps | 3 +++
7 files
---
dh_haskell_depends | 2 +-
hlibrary.mk| 4 ++--
hlibrary.mk.orig | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dh_haskell_depends b/dh_haskell_depends
index b71cec4..4917092 100644
--- a/dh_haskell_depends
+++ b/dh_haskell_depends
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ for pkg
---
Dh_Haskell.sh | 137 +++
Dh_Haskell.sh.orig | 322 +
hlibrary.mk| 79 +++--
hlibrary.mk.orig | 2 +-
4 files changed, 475 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Dh_Haskell.sh.orig
---
Dh_Haskell.sh | 22 +--
Dh_Haskell.sh.orig | 182 +++--
hlibrary.mk| 21 +++
3 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Dh_Haskell.sh b/Dh_Haskell.sh
index 1e1fce6..7cc690a 100644
--- a/Dh_Haskell.sh
---
dh_haskell_blurbs | 5 -
hlibrary.mk | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dh_haskell_blurbs b/dh_haskell_blurbs
index 6d6d3a2..be191bb 100644
--- a/dh_haskell_blurbs
+++ b/dh_haskell_blurbs
@@ -6,10 +6,13 @@
set -e
+DEB_DEFAULT_COMPILER=$1
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
