Hi Frédéric and Thomas,
Sorry for the delay. I must admit I wasn't aware the dogfooding problem
is so difficult to avoid.
On 2019-08-17 07:53, Thomas Finneid wrote:
> The good news is that after talking with some of the maintainers of
> Sbt and Scala, they would be very interrested in getting a
Hello,
I am writing regarding the status of sbt Debian package. Version 0.13.13
is in sid, but it had never entered testing. Version 1.3.0-RC3 has
already been released, are there any plans to update the package? If
not, I would be willing to try my luck.
Best wishes,
Andrius
On 2019-08-08 17:48, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I don't think there is a repository yet. I've just created an empty one
> on Salsa if that helps.
Thanks - I'll push once I have something.
Best,
Andrius
Hi Emmanuel,
On 2019-08-08 10:33, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> sbt is in sid but hasn't been bootstrapped properly yet, it still uses
> libraries not built from sources. Nobody is actively working on it, feel
> free to give it a try.
Thanks, I'll give it a look. By the way, the source package does
Hi Thomas,
On 2019-09-25 23:03, Thomas Finneid wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in answering, I'm on daddy-leave so time is
> scarce. (and sorry for the long mail... :) )
Thank you for finding some time to contribute to packaging Scala/sbt! :)
> I have some more good news :) After battling with my
Hi Thomas,
I have managed to get around Scala FTBFS problem [1] for now, will
continue looking into your script.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941211
On 2019-09-27 02:07, Thomas Finneid wrote:
> 1- The scala library depenencies are hardcoded, so it doesnt find the
>
Hi all,
Recently I have ran into maven-built package with POMs lacking
'...' properties for its dependencies. This however
seems to fail the build process:
[ERROR] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the POMs:
[ERROR] 'dependencies.dependency.version' for junit:junit:jar is
Hi Egon,
On 2019-11-21 11:27, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> Awesome! Plz let me know if I can answer any questions around
> dependencies, or impact of missing dependencies.
I have made it to a successful cdk build today!
I had to exclude three artifacts due to compilation problems (mostly
Hello,
New version of freehep-graphicsio is out (in 2014 [1]), and I would like
to see it packaged. However, packaging of freehep-graphicsio is split in
a dozen of source packages, and update maintaining this split would be
tedious. Maybe merging the source packages (retaining the upstream
Hi,
On 2019-11-19 19:40, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I've sat together with Egon Willighagen who is member of CDK upstream
> team to update the cdk package[1]. So far the switch from ant to maven
> seems to have basically succeeded. However, for some reason it does not
> build modules in the correct
Hi,
I have managed to get around the most of the build problems. However, a
lot of the artifacts depend (transitively) on org.xml-cml.cmlxom, which
is not packaged yet. For the time being I can skip these artifacts, but
in the long run it would be great to have cmlxom packaged.
Best,
Andrius
Hello,
On 2019-11-23 12:30, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> I am not against this, but I think I would happily give away maintenance
> of these packages. I never used them directly, just needed them as
> GeoGebra dependencies.
>
> That said, before updating I would suggest to consider exactly what
Hello,
Java Team's page [1] states that some help/information is needed
regarding the autopkgtest. I haven't seen much Java packages having
autopkgtests, but to me it seems possible at least for packages using
maven-debian-helper. Maybe there are gotchas that I am not aware of?
Workflow of an
Hi Egon,
On 2019-12-31 16:02, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> I saw that CDK 2.3 is now in unstable! Great news! Many thanks for
> your time during the BioHackathon, and others for their effort to make
> this happen. Very much appreciated.
Yes, it's finally in! :) Hope to get the CDK's depiction part
Hi Andreas,
On 2020-04-15 15:53, Andreas Tille wrote:
> This made me wonder about the status of the freehep-* packages that did
> not had a new upload since the move from Alioth. It seems the new version
> of freehep can be found at
>
> https://github.com/freehep
>
> and the structure of the
Hello,
On 2020-04-21 10:40, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> So I have no problems in removing GeoGebra to allow FreeHEP to be
> updated (maybe it turns out that GeoGebra also works with FreeHEP's new
> version, but I believe it is unlikely), but then at the same time I give
> up as FreeHEP
Hi Andreas,
On 2020-04-30 15:27, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I wonder whether this fits into Debian packaging policy at all and
> whether I need to avoid this in favour of packaging proper JARs?
I believe it is the latter. Capsules seem to embed all their
dependencies, and this is something to avoid.
Hi Giovanni,
On 2020-04-21 10:40, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> So I have no problems in removing GeoGebra to allow FreeHEP to be
> updated (maybe it turns out that GeoGebra also works with FreeHEP's new
> version, but I believe it is unlikely), but then at the same time I give
> up as FreeHEP
Hi Andreas,
On 2020-04-28 12:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Any help for a kickstart would be really appreciated.
I have almost no idea what nexus-staging plugin does, but it may be not
essential for building the package. You can try to patch it out by
removing the following lines from build.gradle:
Hello,
On 2020-05-13 16:46, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> I'd like to push json-simple 3.1.1 into unstable, but I'm not sure how I
> should handle the transition. The 3.x releases are not backward
> compatible with 2.x.
>
> A whole set of deprecated classes has been removed:
>> * Deprecated JSONParse
Hello,
On 2020-05-14 10:07, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> I won't maintain 2 source packages. The deprecated one (version 2.x)
> should be dropped. The 'Conflicts' field is needed during the transition
> only. The new package would have:
> * 'json-simple' as source package name (unchanged)
> *
On 2020-05-14 11:27, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> I think I could try this indeed. Would a versioned 'Breaks' field
> listing the few reverse dependencies be useful then?
No, this is not needed, libsimple-json-java upload for v3.0.0 shouldn't
be any different from the other uploads. However, please
Hello,
On 2020-07-19 15:40, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> I have no problem with your changes, but since merkys should be back
> shortly we can leave it to him to do the upload. Once that is done, I
> will push geogebra with the updated patches.
I have uploaded freehep to unstable toda
Hi Andreas,
On 2020-07-01 12:30, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Thanks for this. I've added it to the COVID-19 relevant list of packages
> in new[1]
> [1]
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/community/2020-covid19-hackathon/-/wikis/NEW-Requests
>
Thanks for doing so!
Best,
Andrius
Hi,
On 2020-07-10 09:49, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> There is no need for this step. I have already a patched version that
> compiles with the new FreeHEP. The thing I ask you is to add this patch
> to freehep-vectorgraphics:
[snip]
Glad to hear that, and thanks for the patch. I have added it
Hi,
On 2020-07-10 15:59, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Great, then I revoke the intention of RMing geogebra and close the
> corresponding bug. As soon as freehep-vectographics is available, I will
> bump patches and dependencies on geogebra and everything should be find.
Sure, I will ping you
Hi,
On 2020-07-01 10:46, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Sorry, I completely lost track of this thread. Here is the RM bug:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964070
Thanks a lot for the information. I have uploaded freehep-vectorgraphics
to experimental, waiting for it to
Hello,
On 2020-07-02 18:40, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> On second thought, it seems that it would not be too difficult to port
> GeoGebra to the new FreeHEP, so maybe we can consider this a little bit
> more carefully.
I agree that porting GeoGebra is much better than removing it
altogether. I
Hi Tony,
On 2020-07-29 06:41, tony mancill wrote:
> Fair enough... In the long run, it is likely that porting r-cran-rcdk
> is a better use of time. However, I got interested in it and here is
> the status so far:
>
> 1) I updated jgrapht0.6 to install a pom file and uploaded a new
> package
Hi Tony,
On 2020-07-27 16:50, tony mancill wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:51:49AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
>> What is more, the subtree tool/smsd/ contains only pom.xml, what might
>> be the reason of codeless jar. It seems to me that cdk-smsd is legacy
>> now, and I would suggest
Hello,
On 2020-07-27 08:38, tony mancill wrote:
>> It actually seems that org/openscience/cdk/smsd/Isomorphism is not
>> part of the currently packaged CDK. Any idea how to solve this?
> I am just starting to take a look a this, but I think we need to spend
> some more time with CDK. That class
Hello,
On 2020-07-22 22:00, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Thanks, I just pushed geogebra.
Thanks!
By the way, could you please also initiate removals of obsolete freehep
source packages? They are the following:
freehep-graphics2d
freehep-graphicsio
freehep-graphicsio-emf
freehep-graphicsio-java
Hi Andreas,
On 2020-07-23 17:55, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Would you mind to update cdk package (which was the original issue
> I stumbled upon freehep)?
I have updated cdk yesterday. The cdk-depict module is built now.
Best,
Andrius
right now.
Best,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
mplate-maven-plugin-java (ITP #911302). I have
pushed their packaging to Salsa:
* https://salsa.debian.org/merkys-guest/mojo-executor
* https://salsa.debian.org/merkys-guest/string-template-maven-plugin
(build-depends on libmojo-executor-java)
It would be great if you could review and, if po
e to join the Debian Med sprint in March 2019
> which will happen in Vilnius[1] (no better details yet).
Thanks, I will be there.
Best,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
On 10/24/18 1:40 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I've uploaded mojo-executor and string-template-maven-plugin, they are
> awaiting in the NEW queue for the FTP masters approval. Thanks a lot
> Andrius.
Many thanks for reviewing and uploading the packages!
Best,
Andrius
10:30, Andrius Merkys
> wrote:
> > I am preparing a package for apache-opennlp [1]. Building it results in
> six artifacts, one of them,
> org.apache.opennlp:opennlp-morfologik-addon:jar:1.9.0, depends on another
> artifact org.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools:jar:debian which is b
drius 40 Jan 2 03:17 morfologik-fsa-debian.pom ->
../../../../../../morfologik-fsa/pom.xml
Thus this might be used to solve the interdependency problem. However, this
method looks more like a hack and I expect maven-debian-helper to have some
built-ins for this.
Best,
Andrius
--
Andr
to fix this? I would like to investigate the issue
myself, but cannot figure out how to get to the build.
Best,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
Hello,
I have recently been granted Developer rights in Debian Java Project on
Salsa (as 'merkys'). However, I am unable to create new repositories
there, and I am willing to upload a couple of new packages. Are there
additional requirements for repo creation rights? I have read and I
accept
ndrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
Dear Markus,
On 2019-04-01 16:39, Markus Koschany wrote:
> You just needed the "maintainer" status. I've granted it a minute ago.
> Welcome on board!
Thanks a lot for adding me!
Best wishes,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio
On 2019-04-17 09:52, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> ~/Documents/ITR-1_2019_170419$ cat ITR.sh
> java -jar ITR-1_AY201920_PR1.jar
OK, this means that all required classes should be there in the JAR
file. Could you check what does 'jar -tvf ITR-1_AY201920_PR1.jar | grep
ThreeRedLightsIlluminate' say?
Hello,
On 2019-04-17 09:35, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> I don't think it's just an openjdk issue, it's probably something to
> do with the class as it shows -
>
> com.itd.efiling.offline.common.player.ctrl.ThreeRedLightsIlluminate
to me this looks like a problem with the CLASSPATH. Does
Dear Shirish,
On 2019-04-17 10:19, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> ~/Documents/ITR-1_2019_170419$ jar -tvf ITR-1_AY201920_PR1.jar | grep
> ThreeRedLightsIlluminate
> 1699 Mon Apr 15 19:26:26 IST 2019
> com/itd/efiling/offline/common/player/ctrl/ThreeRedLightsIlluminate$1.class
> 3599 Mon Apr 15
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019, 22:19 Andreas Tille, wrote:
> I have no idea what restrictions the lack of cmlxom might imply.
>
I have packaged and uploaded cmlxom today. Will do so with the rest of
dependencies.
Would you take over and upload your changes? If not please push and
> let me
Hi Andreas,
On 2020-05-20 14:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Any hint how to take this hurdle would be welcome.
Try setting the CLASSPATH in your d/rules like this:
export CLASSPATH :=
$(DEBJAR)/htsjdk.jar:$(DEBJAR)/picard.jar:$(DEBJAR)/commons-collections4.jar
I did this in one of packages and it
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/maven-debian-helper/-/merge_requests/2
[2]
https://salsa.debian.org/merkys/maven-debian-helper/-/blob/autopkgtest-pkg-maven/share/maven-debian-helper/autopkgtest-runner
Hope this helps,
Andrius
Hello,
I want to make an upload for xom package with a couple of fixes. I want
to use its packaging repository on salsa [1], but it is in somewhat
diverged state. The newest Debian version of xom is 1.2.10-1.1, but
repository on salsa has 1.2.10-1 (note incorrect git tag) plus a pair of
commits
Hi Sebastiaan,
On 2021-08-25 12:32, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Import the changes from the NMU:
>
> gbp import-dsc /tmp/xom_1.2.10-1.1.dsc
>
> Review the changes since -1:
>
> git diff debian/1.2.10-1{,.1} debian/
>
> Restore changes that were reverted by the NMU import.
Thanks, I will
Hi,
On 2021-09-15 00:59, Philippe De Neve wrote:
> I was wondering why the Gradle version in buster/bullseye/bookworm/sid
> is 4.4.1. Latest release is 7.2.
Please see these bug reports for reference:
https://bugs.debian.org/926714
https://bugs.debian.org/933264
Best,
Andrius
Hello,
Maintainer of antlr4-cpp-runtime here.
On 2021-07-28 22:36, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> 2) Do "$something-else" for all these packages to stay in sync - again,
> probably bumping versions only when needed.
> With this approach, I do not see a problem in introducing a Go runtime
> source package
Hello,
Java policy on Java libraries (Ch. 2.4.) reads [1]:
Their classes must be in jar archive(s) in the directory /usr/
share/java, with the name packagename[-extraname]
-fullversion.jar. The extraname is optional and used internally
within the package to separate the different
Hi,
On 2021-10-18 10:31, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
>>> Not sure though what is the impact of this policy inversion. Most of
>>> Java-related software seems to read both regular files and symbolic
>>> links transparently.
>>
>> There isn't much impact, both styles are fine in my opinion.
>
> This
Hi Pierre,
On 2021-10-17 22:18, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> * Package name: ciftools-java
> Version : 3.0.0
> Upstream Author : Sebastian Bittrich
> * URL : https://github.com/rcsb/ciftools-java
> * License : Expat
> Programming Lang: Java
> Description :
Hi Markus,
On 2021-10-15 14:34, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Indeed, that looks like a bug in libcommons-lang3-java or rather maven-debian-
> helper to me. I have just checked some other Maven packages and there the
> policy is implemented correctly. The bug in libcommons-lang3-java could be
>
Hi Alexandre,
On 2022-03-23 16:33, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> Seems to work:
>
> $ ls -la /usr/share/java/htmlcleaner*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 18 mars 18:20
> /usr/share/java/htmlcleaner-2.26.jar -> htmlcleaner.jar
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 176219 18 mars 18:20
Hello,
Some time ago there was a discussion about the need to coordinate
uploads of antlr and its runtime packages, as in Debian they are split
into several source packages across several teams:
On 2021-07-29 10:09, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Maybe an antlr4 packaging team could be set
Hi Ole,
On 2023-12-08 13:03, Ole Streicher wrote:
I am trying to update the adql-java package to the newest upstream
(beta) version. As it is my first project using gradle, I sumbled upon a
number of problems:
One is that the plugin org.javacc.javacc is not available. I guess this
is because
60 matches
Mail list logo
