On Thursday, February 4, 2021 4:49:21 AM EST Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 2/2/21 7:46 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > Both Eventlet and DNSPython are monkey patching the standard SSL library
> > in potentially conflicting ways
>
> After checking, that's *NOT* the case. Though Eventlet is doing
>
On Sunday, October 4, 2020 10:24:22 PM EDT Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 3:29 PM Fioddor Superconcentrado wrote:
> > I've packaged a project provided via https://pipi.org and I wanted to
> > create a debian/watch file but pipi.org publishes the tarball behind a
> > strange url like
> I
I've started working on updating dnspython to 2.0.0. The package itself is
basically ready to go, but there is at least one incompatibility I've found
relative to the current 1.16.0 version.
As far as I can tell, this only affects DNS results for type TXT lookups. For
those, the data
On Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:21:45 AM EDT Matthias Klose wrote:
> The removal of packages still depending on Python2 looks good [1], however
> we have a bunch of packages that still require Python2, and where
> maintainers explicitly asked to keep those in the distro [2]. Among those
> are pypy
On Monday, June 29, 2020 7:53:46 AM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 6/29/20 12:58 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On June 29, 2020 10:12:49 AM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> On 6/29/20 8:34 AM, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> >>> nope, this is not true. Using the
On Monday, June 29, 2020 10:17:57 AM EDT Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >>> More over, mock debhelper was upgraded to 13, for no apparent
> >>
> >> reason
> >>
> >>> (yet another "cosmet
On June 29, 2020 10:12:49 AM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>On 6/29/20 8:34 AM, Ondrej Novy wrote:
...
>> More over, mock debhelper was upgraded to 13, for no apparent
>reason
>> (yet another "cosmetic fix" that isn't helping?). I'd like to
>remind
>> everyone that, increasing
On June 29, 2020 3:08:53 AM UTC, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm working on poetry packaging, I created on salsa de repository [0].
>
>Note that there are many packages that are not in Debian like cachy,
>cleo,
>etc.
>
>I RFS python-cachy [1] and now I'm working on cleo, which depends on
On Sunday, June 28, 2020 1:59:08 PM EDT Sandro Tosi wrote:
> 5. consolidating packages *into* the DPMT/PAPT gives a lot of
> benefits, f.e. people basically got "free" handling of the py2removal
> process; moving packages out is actually detrimental for the python
> ecosystem (at least that's my
On Thursday, June 4, 2020 8:00:30 PM EDT Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello all,
> it looks like i started a process that would require the removal of
> several PyPy (as in pypy-* depending on the `pypy` package) packages
> from the archive.
>
> I'm now wondering: what should we do with the entire pypy
On Thursday, June 4, 2020 7:39:59 PM EDT Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Scott Kitterman writes:
> > On Monday, April 13, 2020 5:18:53 AM EDT Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> >> Hi Scott!
> >>
> >> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 06:31:57PM -0400, Scott Kitterma
On Friday, May 15, 2020 4:36:52 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 5/15/20 7:09 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Friday, May 15, 2020 12:55:48 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> On 5/15/20 5:43 PM, jojo wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>
On Friday, May 15, 2020 12:55:48 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 5/15/20 5:43 PM, jojo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to join the list because I think my software is a valuable
> > addition to the debian universe, my ultimate goal would be to bring it
> > into Ubuntu Studio because it is
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 10:32:42 PM EDT Doug Torrance wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am interested in joining the Python Applications Packaging Team. I'm
> experienced in packaging for Debian and am an active member of the Window
> Maker and Science teams. However, I don't have much experience with
On Thursday, December 5, 2019 11:42:02 AM EDT Scott Talbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm already a member of DPMT, I would like to join PAPT as well so I can
> also contribute to those packages. I have read the policy and accept it.
>
> Salsa ID: swt2c-guest
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
I know this is late,
On Friday, May 8, 2020 6:59:08 AM EDT Uwe Steinmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> not sure if this is the right list, but it was my closes guess.
>
> I'm packaging a c++ program (horizon-eda) which also contains a
> python module written in c++. Upstream's Makefile has a target 'pymodule'
> and 'make
On Thursday, April 30, 2020 5:32:39 PM EDT peter green wrote:
> I would like to join the DPMT, there are a couple of reasons for this.
>
> Firstly I have been making an effort to try and get broken
> build-dependencies in testing fixed, and this often ends up involving
> python module packages.
On Thursday, April 30, 2020 6:21:48 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, April 30, 2020 5:49:20 PM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote:
> > Hi Scott (2020.04.30_20:33:59_+)
> >
> > > > That seems reasonable, although if we're going down that road, it
> > &g
On Thursday, April 30, 2020 5:49:20 PM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Scott (2020.04.30_20:33:59_+)
>
> > > That seems reasonable, although if we're going down that road, it
> > > probably makes no sense for any of them to be universal.
> >
> > If we were talking about maintaining this for
On Thursday, April 30, 2020 2:32:24 PM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Scott (2020.04.30_16:23:41_+)
>
> > Making dirtbike build a py3 wheel for setuptools (and pkg_resources),
> > which is technically accurate at this point since dirtbike can't build
> > wheels from a>
> > python2 package
On April 30, 2020 7:21:39 AM UTC, Matthias Klose wrote:
>On 4/30/20 5:28 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> I think Python policy changes should be discussed. I accidentally
>committed a
>> change to git [1] (I didn't realize I still had access, I thought it
>would b
I think Python policy changes should be discussed. I accidentally committed a
change to git [1] (I didn't realize I still had access, I thought it would be
a merge request) to allow Python 3 only wheels for packages that require
wheels, but that no longer support Python 2. This is going to
On April 26, 2020 4:06:00 PM UTC, Anil F Duggirala
wrote:
>hello,
>I am running into an issue installing psutil: pip3 install psutil, in a
>virtual environment. I have upgraded my pip and setuptools with no
>avail. I am getting this error: https://pastebin.com/2Xb7UN9g
>Some have suggested
On Saturday, April 25, 2020 1:10:37 PM EDT Anil F Duggirala wrote:
> hello,
> Im having an issue while installing a piece of software with pip3:
> pip3 install --user -r contrib/requirements/requirements-binaries.txt
>
> Command "python setup.py egg_info" failed with error code 1 in
>
On April 24, 2020 12:26:27 AM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau"
wrote:
>On 20-04-23 17 h 54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:21:49 PM EDT Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
>>> This warning was added to Lintian today, after being requested in
>>&
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:21:49 PM EDT Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> This warning was added to Lintian today, after being requested in
> #958182. It appears on thousands of packages:
> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructu
> re.html
Thanks. I mailed the
This one has the same issue.
Scott K
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 1:05:23 PM EDT Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> Accepted:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Format: 1.8
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 18:39:20 +0200
> Source: todoman
> Architecture: source
> Version: 3.7.0-2
>
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 1:06:42 PM EDT Félix Sipma wrote:
> Note that changing the address triggers a lintian warning:
>
> W: khard source: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure Python
> Applications Packaging Team
Python Applications Packaging Team
is correct.
Scott K
On April 19, 2020 3:24:17 PM UTC, "Félix Sipma" wrote:
>Hi Thomas,
>
>Thanks for the review, and it's nice to see you found a number of
>problems! I have to admit I did not prepare a new package since a long
>time, probably forgot a lot of things, and copied others from other
>packages of
On Tuesday, April 14, 2020 11:33:29 AM EDT Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> On 4/14/20 4:02 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 14, 2020 8:25:36 AM EDT Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> could please somebody who have enough privileges remove
> >>
&
In the course of dropping python3.7 from supported versions binNMUs were
scheduled before the python3-defaults update dropping python3.7 migrated to
testing.
These binNMUs migrated to Testing immediately. This resulted in a case where
in Testing, python3.7 and python3.8 were supported
On Tuesday, April 14, 2020 8:25:36 AM EDT Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> Hi,
> could please somebody who have enough privileges remove
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/authprogs.git
>
> It is an application and should be located in python-team/applications.
I've moved it:
On Monday, April 13, 2020 5:18:53 AM EDT Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi Scott!
>
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 06:31:57PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > This being roughly the mid-point in the development cycle, I thought it
> > might be good to see where we are in terms of fu
On April 13, 2020 3:44:31 AM UTC, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:32 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>> I took a look at the presence of pyproject.toml files in the Debian
>archive.
>> There are currently 99 packages. Of those, only 28 specify a
>'build-backen
On Sunday, April 12, 2020 9:56:01 PM EDT Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello,
> python-pytest is blocking 18 packages from removal, most of them would
> be leaves once python-pytest is gone.
>
> so i was playing with the idea of tackling python-pytest removal by
> updating all its rdeps and not run
This being roughly the mid-point in the development cycle, I thought it might
be good to see where we are in terms of future Python packaging developments.
As I understand it, PEP-517 and PEP-518 are 'the future'.
I took a look at the presence of pyproject.toml files in the Debian archive.
On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 11:56:22 PM EDT Olek Wojnar wrote:
> Dear DPMT members,
>
> You may be aware that the Debian Med team is in the middle of a
> biohackathon [1] to provide better FOSS tools to the medical community for
> their work on the COVID-19 pandemic. We just had a new contributor
On Saturday, April 4, 2020 5:53:30 PM EDT fancycade wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I would like to join the Python Modules Team. For the time being I am
> interested in maintaining packages related to the upcoming covid
> biohackathon. Specifically I am trying to get my feet wet by packaging this
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python3-sphinx-better-theme
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Author : Steve Johnson
* URL : https://pypi.org/project/sphinx-better-theme
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : modified version
On Monday, April 6, 2020 8:17:53 PM EDT Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 5:04 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > There was a telepathy-gabble upload this week that took out a bunch of
> > python2 build-deps, but it looks like telepathy-gabble-tests retained
> > ma
On Monday, April 6, 2020 9:24:35 AM EDT Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [2020-03-30 17:47]:
> >I've heard pybuild now has a cmake backend, so theoretically you could do
> >something like
> >
> >%:
> > dh $@ --buildsystem=pybuild --system=cmake
>
> [..]
>
There was a telepathy-gabble upload this week that took out a bunch of python2
build-deps, but it looks like telepathy-gabble-tests retained many of them as
depends:
https://packages.debian.org/unstable/telepathy-gabble-tests
In particular, this is the last package in Testing that depends on
On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 9:54:41 AM EDT Sandro Tosi wrote:
> >> Maybe you can paste the list of 20 affected apps, though?
> >
> > I'm more interested in the 18 that are above 1000. Could you please just
> > list them all 38, sorted by popocon?
> here's the list:
>
> cvs2svn - popcon = 303,
>
On March 28, 2020 5:10:42 AM UTC, Sergio Durigan Junior
wrote:
>On Friday, March 27 2020, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote:
>
>> On 27.03.2020 20:09, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>>> On Friday, March 27 2020, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>>
>>>> The python3-defa
On Friday, March 27, 2020 3:39:30 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, March 27, 2020 3:21:38 PM EDT Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote:
> > On 27.03.2020 20:09, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> > > On Friday, March 27 2020, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > >> The p
On Friday, March 27, 2020 3:21:38 PM EDT Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote:
> On 27.03.2020 20:09, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> > On Friday, March 27 2020, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >> The python3-defaults with python3.8 as the default python3 has migrated
> >> to
> >>
The python3-defaults with python3.8 as the default python3 has migrated to
Testing thanks to the release team hammering things around until it went.
Most of the outstanding autipkgtest failures with python3.8 were fixed either
in unstable or in git/BTS. Here are the remaining issues that
Pybuild has a cmake plugin that I think is relatively new. It may handle the
complexity for you, but I've never tried it. We used to do this with pykde4,
which is available on snapshot..d.o.
Scott K
On Friday, March 27, 2020 8:48:33 AM EDT Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Could anyone
On March 26, 2020 7:02:20 AM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Hi Andrey,
>
>On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:34:11AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/954640
>
>Thanks a lot. Multiqc builds with humanfriendly from Git.
>
>Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
The bug is fixed in
On Monday, March 23, 2020 12:30:15 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Sunday, March 22, 2020 1:10:35 AM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 21, 2020 2:28:15 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > On Saturday, March 21, 2020 5:44:15 AM EDT Graham Inggs wrote
On Sunday, March 22, 2020 1:10:35 AM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, March 21, 2020 2:28:15 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 21, 2020 5:44:15 AM EDT Graham Inggs wrote:
> > > Hi Scott
> > >
> > > On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 06:41, Scott
On Saturday, March 21, 2020 2:28:15 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, March 21, 2020 5:44:15 AM EDT Graham Inggs wrote:
> > Hi Scott
> >
> > On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 06:41, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> > > I've gone through and statused the issues current
On Saturday, March 21, 2020 5:44:15 AM EDT Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi Scott
>
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 06:41, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I've gone through and statused the issues currently listed on the package
> > tracker for python3-defaults migration that are autopkgtes
I've gone through and statused the issues currently listed on the package
tracker for python3-defaults migration that are autopkgtest related [1]. I
stuffed it into a pastebin [2]. I'm open to suggestions about where better to
maintain such a list.
If you ever want python3.8 as default
On Monday, March 2, 2020 9:14:52 AM EST Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > The src:ipykernel-py2 package provides python-ipykernel, which is to be
> > removed for the Python 2 removal transition.
>
> Cc-ing Gordon explicitly: the last time we spoke, Gordon wanted to
> keep the python2 stack of
On Friday, February 28, 2020 2:56:24 PM EST Scott Talbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently a member as swt2c-guest, but I recently became a DD, so can
> I please be re-added to DPMT and PAPT under swt2c.
>
> I still accept all policies. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
Done. I set an expiration of a
On Friday, February 28, 2020 2:28:29 PM EST Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to join the DPMT group on Salsa, please.
>
> I currently maintain 15 Python modules uploaded (repos are in the
> general debian group) that I'd like to move to the group, and most
> importantly I have accepted
On Sunday, March 1, 2020 2:53:13 PM EST Georg Faerber wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I was part of the team in the past as 'georg-guest', I would like to
> join again as 'georg'. I do maintain anorack and mwic.
>
> I've read the team policy and accept it.
>
> Thanks,
> Georg
Welcome back.
Scott K
On Saturday, February 8, 2020 2:50:54 PM EST Gordon Ball wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 02:42:11AM +0000, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On February 7, 2020 3:59:46 PM UTC, Mattia Rizzolo
wrote:
> > >On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 11:36:00AM +, Gordon Ball wrote:
> > >>
On February 8, 2020 12:38:54 PM UTC, Ondrej Novy wrote:
>Hi,
>
>so 8. 2. 2020 v 4:11 odesílatel Scott Kitterman
>napsal:
>
>> Except: Every time we add a binary to Debian it impacts everyone.
>The
>> packages file gets bigger and so updates get slower. Alt
On February 7, 2020 3:59:46 PM UTC, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 11:36:00AM +, Gordon Ball wrote:
>> I wonder if this split really makes sense; it feels like adding the
>> overhead of an extra binary package to avoid not having a very small
>> file in /usr/bin if you're
On February 2, 2020 9:58:45 PM UTC, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
wrote:
>Hello
>
>on unstable it works but on buster (and we need to make it work for
>buster)
>we have this message
>
>Python 3.7.3 (default, Apr 3 2019, 05:39:12)
>[GCC 8.3.0] on linux
>Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or
On Friday, January 24, 2020 2:00:36 PM EST Scott Kitterman wrote:
> The next step is to deal with all the packages that pip vendors and we
> unvendor. There are quite a few packages that need updating to a sufficient
> version for the new pip:
>
> Needs packaging:
> pep517
I started looking into updating pip to the current release because I knew it
would take awhile and we need to do it at some point. Merging our changes
into the new upstream release turned out to be somewhat less challenging that
I had feared (alternately it wasn't and I messed it up). I've
It looks like a lot of this is lintian-brush generated and of questionable
value, IMO. As an example, bumping compat to 12 is trivial to do.
The hard part is checking if it affects the package content, so the bot has
produced a proposed change that will take far longer to verify than it
On November 28, 2019 5:27:53 PM UTC, Simon McVittie wrote:
>On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 11:15:31 -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> if you install `pubsub` as top-level module, your package must be
>> named pythonN-pubsub, if not it violates the policy and it's RC
>buggy.
>
>That's what I had thought,
On November 18, 2019 11:14:03 AM UTC, Thibaut Paumard
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've noted that python3-dev's last upload last week dropped the
>dependency on dh-python. I find this change surprising in the context
>of
>the current Python 3.8 transition.
>
>This makes "my" package yp-svipc FTBFS. I'm
On November 10, 2019 10:09:57 PM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>On 11/10/19 1:20 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> is there any public trace of these "many voices"?
>
>Just like when we discussed moving away from SVN to Git, we can't know
>the exact number unless we have a kind of poll/vote (but we don't
On Monday, October 28, 2019 11:02:40 AM EDT Félix Sipma wrote:
> On 2019-10-28 10:44-0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > It's the way setuptools works. Looking at the current upstream
> > recommendations:
> >
> > https://python-packaging.readthedocs.io/en/latest/non-co
On Monday, October 28, 2019 10:25:44 AM EDT Félix Sipma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with package_data files in a package ("khard", which is
> not currently under the debian-python umbrella but it is on my todo list
> to transfer it, I just didn't find the time yet) not getting installed.
>
On Monday, October 14, 2019 3:45:06 PM EDT Nick Morrott wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to migrate my current membership of the debian-python DPMT
> and PAPT teams on salsa to use my shiny, new DD account \o/. My salsa
> account is nickm.
>
> Thank you for your help, guidance, mentorship and
On Sunday, October 13, 2019 10:52:17 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In some cases I've seen, particularly in the med or science team,
> switching some packages to Python 3 requires a significant effort.
>
> For example, today I looked into removing Python 2 from python-cogent.
> Running
On Wednesday, October 2, 2019 11:37:59 AM EDT Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I would like to request to be included in the Debian Python Modules
> Team.
>
> * Why you want to join the team: I would like to maintain altair (See
> #941599) within the team, as any other future
On Monday, October 7, 2019 1:56:18 AM EDT Stuart Prescott wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> Could you please add me to DPMT.
>
> I've been looking at upgrading plastex (which is team maintained but with no
> active maintainer) to a newer upstream version; upgrading it to a newer
> upstream version gets rid
On September 15, 2019 11:59:08 PM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau"
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>What is the process to update the DPMT and PAPT policies? I feel the
>DPMT policy is pretty good and I feel the PAPT policy could copy a
>bunch
>of stuff from there.
>
>For example, the PAPT policy doesn't
On September 9, 2019 3:25:43 AM UTC, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:11 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>> This was sent to the FTP Team, but it seems like someone with some
>bandwidth
>> to assist from DPMT/PAPT would be a better audience. Note that the
>remova
; The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/920127
>
> This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
> a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
> ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.
>
> Debian distributi
On Saturday, August 31, 2019 11:09:33 AM EDT Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 10:20:32AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I definitely think it will be helpful. Thanks for putting it together.
> > It's the best thing I've seen yet for answering the question of
On Saturday, August 31, 2019 2:31:36 AM EDT Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello,
> i've prepared a small website,
> http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html, to keep track of
> the bugs user-tagged `py2removal`.
>
> * i'm sure there are bugs
> * it's pretty brutal html, but should provide useful
On Sunday, August 25, 2019 10:55:55 AM EDT Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 24.08.19 07:03, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 15, 2019 8:08:41 AM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> Hi there!
> >>
> >> According to the daily graph I built here:
> >>
On Saturday, August 24, 2019 3:26:33 AM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, August 24, 2019 2:46:04 AM EDT Guðjón Guðjónsson wrote:
> > Hi list
> >
> > QScintilla Qt4/python2 version has one reverse dependency and it is the
> > tora package that is marked
On Saturday, August 24, 2019 6:28:10 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I came across python-xattr, which I know well because it's used in
> Swift. I went to investigate it's reverse dependencies, and discovered
> that it's py2 version is only used by calendarserver, which itself, is
> py2
On Saturday, August 24, 2019 2:46:04 AM EDT Guðjón Guðjónsson wrote:
> Hi list
>
> QScintilla Qt4/python2 version has one reverse dependency and it is the
> tora package that is marked for autoremoval on the 5th of September.
>
> Shall I keep support for Qt4/python2 in my upgrade or is it ok to
On Thursday, August 15, 2019 8:08:41 AM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> According to the daily graph I built here:
> http://py2graph.infomaniak.ch/py2.7.deps.svg
>
> we can work on Python 2 removal for the below packages. Note that I have
> *not* checked for reverse dependencies,
On Monday, August 5, 2019 8:53:21 AM EDT mer...@debian.org wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On 2019-08-05 02:07, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I'm about to upload an updated pyyaml. It adds deprecation warnings for
> > unsafe pyyaml usage [1]. If you maintain a package that uses pyyaml,
On July 24, 2019 4:08:54 PM UTC, Scott Talbert wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Ondrej Novy wrote:
>
>> út 23. 7. 2019 v 11:40 odesílatel Scott Talbert
>napsal:
>> When removing leaf python2 packages for bullseye, is there
>> anything
>>
>>
>> __modules__ package :)
>>
>>
On July 24, 2019 1:01:47 AM UTC, "eamanu15 ." wrote:
>El mar., 23 de jul. de 2019 a la(s) 21:55, Drew Parsons
>(dpars...@debian.org)
>escribió:
>
>> Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> > See https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python2-rm.html
>> >
&
Thanks. That dropped almost 1,900 packages off the tracker.
Scott K
On July 22, 2019 4:07:43 PM UTC, "Piotr Ożarowski" wrote:
>Format: 1.8
>Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:40:36 +0200
>Source: dh-python
>Architecture: source
>Version: 4.20190722
>Distribution: unstable
>Urgency: medium
>Maintainer:
See https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python2-rm.html
The ones near the top of the stack (bottom of the page) are less likely to
have rdepends that need to be sorted before action can be taken on them.
Scott K
On July 16, 2019 3:42:47 PM UTC, Matthias Klose wrote:
>On 16.07.19 17:31, Julien Puydt wrote:
>> Le 16/07/2019 à 17:21, Andrey Rahmatullin a écrit :
>>> Python 2 is included in buster and so will be supported for several
>>> years.
>>>
>>
>> The starting point of the thread was :
>> 1. Ok,
On Monday, July 8, 2019 5:45:17 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 7/8/19 6:28 PM, Stewart Ferguson wrote:
> > On 2019-07-08 00:13:45, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> On 7/7/19 5:31 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>> you can start dropping it now, however please don't drop anything yet
> >>> with
> >>>
On Sunday, July 7, 2019 6:13:45 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 7/7/19 5:31 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 07.07.19 16:55, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >> On 2019-07-07 22:46, Mo Zhou wrote:
> >>> Hi science team,
> >>>
> >>> By the way, when do we start dropping python2 support?
> >>> The upstreams
On March 30, 2019 10:29:27 AM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Clack Boylan, from the OpenStack infra team, wrote this patch:
>
>https://github.com/pypa/pip/pull/6367/commits/f8292a304deebcf0e4cda2e40caa226c70030f11
>
>which fixes this:
>
>https://bugs.debian.org/837764
>
>I do believe this
On Sunday, February 10, 2019 06:04:17 PM Christian Kastner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> pyrit has been handed over to pkg-security, where it will be better
> taken care of, and the main repository is now pkg-security-team/pyrit.
>
> Could one of the owners of PAPT on Salsa please remove the repository
>
On January 28, 2019 9:28:59 AM UTC, Ondrej Novy wrote:
>Hi,
>
>pá 25. 1. 2019 v 22:20 odesílatel Scott Kitterman
>
>napsal:
>
>> I've added you to both DPMT and PAPT. As discussed on IRC, I think
>PAPT
>> is
>> the right answer for Tox.
>>
>
>
On Saturday, January 26, 2019 04:05:50 PM Martin Kelly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm attempting to release a new version of my package python-gmpy2 [1]
> and am hitting a bug that I can't figure out how to resolve.
> Specifically, in the latest version under pbuilder, python-setuptools is
> missing. When
I've added you to both DPMT and PAPT. As discussed on IRC, I think PAPT is
the right answer for Tox.
Scott K
On Monday, January 21, 2019 01:17:00 PM Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to be added to the Python team Salsa group (either PAPT, DPMT,
> or both -- see below). My salsa
On Saturday, January 05, 2019 08:30:28 PM Ole Streicher wrote:
> Mattia Rizzolo writes:
> > On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 04:02:35PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> >> I'll do tonight. It however looks a bit suboptimal: when the CI test
> >> with a new version fails for an old reverse dependency, then
On Sunday, December 23, 2018 05:22:07 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Which PAPT package is a fairly good shape to be used as reference
> for bringing another PAPT package in better shape?
>
>
> Context:
> I'm new to PAPT and would like to have some examples packages.
I think
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 11:44:44 AM Neil Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 11:41:40 +0100
>
> Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > On 11/28/18 5:51 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > I'd expect at least python3-django to be in that list. Could be an
> > > upstream bug in their setup.py
> >
> > From
101 - 200 of 683 matches
Mail list logo
