too. I'll be brushing up the necessary updates tomorrow ready for a
simple pull on the day.
(BTW, Wheezy will still be 3.0.0 for us - we'll get back into step with
Jessie as 8.0.0 via the new dak support. We can skip 4, 5, 6 7.)
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk
they want
quickly.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpcvf08q9qre.pgp
Description: PGP signature
of Wheezy.
Users of stable are generally quite familiar with using the relevant
backports packages. Users specify exactly which packages are selected
from backports.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpq5cbni0CII.pgp
Description: PGP signature
+dpkg-cross.
+
+ -- Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:16:57 +0100
+
emdebian-crush (2.2.18) unstable; urgency=low
* Implement the new lintian profile support
Index: xapt/xapt
===
--- xapt/xapt (working copy
/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpmhSSTouymH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
scim-anthy is RC buggy and out of all the possible fixes, the
only sensible choice is to remove scim-anthy from testing and
reintroduce it via wheezy-backports once that becomes available.
The
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
scim-prime is RC buggy in wheezy but the NMU uploaded
to unstable contains significant changes including replacing
the dpatch build-dependency with source format 3.0 quilt -
including rewriting
@@
+scim-chewing (0.3.4-1.2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Apply gtk.patch from unstable upload without extraneous
+changes. Fixes FTBFS: scim_color_button.cpp
+(Closes: #684854). Thanks Tz-Huan Huang tzh...@gmail.com
+from upstream.
+
+ -- Neil
.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/08/msg01479.html
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpboIuxC3cCc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment
and to close RC bug #680829, I feel it is necessary to
remove libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl from testing.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment
and to close RC bug #680819, I feel it is necessary to
remove libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl from testing.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment
and to close RC bug #680843, I feel it is necessary to
remove libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
twidge needs to be migrated to a modified hoauth API but the
RC bug #665254 has had no maintainer input since it was
opened in March. (Maintainer is also upstream.)
Please remove twidge from
.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpitnjZIDhex.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 14:17:05 +0100
Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 10:59:42 +0100
Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org wrote:
If you want it in Debian now, push it into experimental. If you
would be the only upstream change
between 0.94.3 and 0.94.4. After Wheezy, we'll switch the catdoc build
to probably cmake and do a backport including some other interim
fixes.
Is this appropriate as an RC bug fix?
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk
includes changes made without using the patch system you
added later in the diff... presumably because that change was made
without using a patch system. Again, no bug report for this change, no
indication of why it needs to be done in Wheezy.
--
Neil Williams
=
http
it is unpacked.
Wherever the data lives inside the .deb is not the problem.
Where the data gets cached, copied, listed and parsed is likely to be a
major problem.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpxAKk7tlVeC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
will be made
given the lack of response to the original RC bug against linbox.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpDh15hW5Rhx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
in order to build stuff for amd64
armel. Foreign means that I just need one version - ideal for Arch:all.
i.e. foreign is less constrained than same and foreign packages need
only specify Multi-Arch: foreign in debian/control to complete their
conversion.
--
Neil Williams
=
http
information out of
the installation process and send that in as a bug report. Have you
been able to install Debian on this particular machine before?
I've tested d-i for testing recently and the network interface came up
normally via DHCP, using isc-dhcp.
--
Neil Williams
=
http
gnome-user-share ?
http://packages.debian.org/sid/gnome-user-share
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpX6lhORw3vY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
by anyone. It's not a lot of time to get a major upstream
version packaged and tested.
Backports exists to allow for packages which are updated at points
where there wasn't enough time to get the new version into the release.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk
answer. The decision has been made, emacs24 was not and is not
ready for inclusion into Wheezy, the window for it to be considered
has closed. Wheezy will have emacs23, not emacs24 but emacs24 is
certainly a candidate for backports.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk
policy, especially rule #7:
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
Turn your request into an unblock bug and attach a complete debdiff
between the version currently in testing and the version to unblock.
(Rule #3)
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk
Just to help those scanning the RC bug lists, the binNMU request for
bobcat is #683244. The binNMU for c++-annotations would need to be
requested later.
I've done a simple test in a pbuilder chroot and the principle of the
request does fix these two RC bugs.
--
Neil Williams
the version in testing and the version in
unstable to be attached.
Please CC me because I am not subscribed in the list.
Which is another reason to use bug reports.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgp4UKs3UJfIY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the release.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpY9GJygtCiN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
this
as unchanged.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpKwIJrEZuWd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
There's a circular dependency with gnotime and qof - both are valid candidates
so I'd like to ask that gnotime and qof are hinted to go into testing
together.
Both packages are new upstream releases, QOF has had a major upgrade and
gnotime fixes several bugs.
Thanks.
--
Neil Williams
, it seems too far into the freeze, especially if this new
dependency is not part of the fix for the RC bug.
* A transition is required (four rdeps)
... and that helps the release of Squeeze how?
Has a simpler fix for #594519 been investigated, based on 2.3?
--
Neil Williams
=
http
the package back into
Squeeze when nothing has actually changed since it was removed?
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpRcJ4xREQE4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:29:51 +0100
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
Oops, forgot the changelog:
Source: emdebian-crush
Version: 2.2.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:08:38 +0100
Closes: 595804 596008 596088
2.2.7 has just been accepted into unstable for two i18n bug fixes and
just a standards-version update:
Source: emdebian-grip
Version: 2.2.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:02:21 +0100
Closes: 585500 592870
Changes
Documentation and translation update:
Source: svn-buildpackage
Version: 0.8.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:18:20 +0100
Closes: 592756 594442 596350
Changes:
svn-buildpackage (0.8.2) unstable; urgency=low
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 16:46:13 +0100
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 11:29 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
I had to modify the build system slightly for the i18n support in
emdebian-crush 2.2.5 and I also tweaked one logic check:
$arch = `debconf-show
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:29:21 +0100
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 17:15 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Documentation and translation update:
Unblocked.
Sadly, 5 days after the l10n deadline passed, 4 days after the upload
and unblock, I've received
not relevent here, where we're discussing fixing actual
bugs, and should definately not change at this stage (if at
all, and I remain unconvinced).
The readline dependency has also been reverted. Re-opening the affected
bug.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http
I've now got all the l10n updates for multistrap (program output and
manpages) and I'm ready to upload 2.1.7 to unstable.
This upload also fixes one important bug and one GPL-compliance issue:
Source: multistrap
Version: 2.1.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Neil Williams codeh
On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 16:44:22 +0200
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) f...@funlabs.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02-10-2010 20:03, Neil Williams wrote:
[...]
Please let me know if this change is acceptable for a freeze
exception
- if so, I'll upload
alone Wheezy.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpwHwfb8YcAT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package multistrap
Approval request prior to upload:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/10/msg00070.html
The upload has now been made, please unblock
.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpw92ydp9xit.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 19:10:04 +0100
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
tags 540341 + moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 14:36 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
I'd like to ask for apt-cross to be removed from Squeeze to fix the
RC bug #591457 and a long standing bug, #502433
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:04:43 +
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package emdebian-crush @ 2.2.5.1
As part of the fix for #540341 (and, in turn, #591457
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
gpib already has a FTFBS (#577321) (open since 2009) and the
gpib-modules-source package also fails to build a module (bug #550932).
I agree with the comments in 577321, this package should be
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
In the absence of any progress on the RC bug (#597375 data loss if move is
cancelled),
despite pings, bsc should removed from Squeeze. If there is a fix, it can go
into
unstable or if no news
of
Emdebian Grip based on the updated Lenny.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpbd6HabRXia.pgp
Description: PGP signature
been
explained and the diff is so large that it would be hard to see how it
would pass any level of freeze constraint.
OTOH you could make a better impression on the release team by fixing
some RC bugs in other packages instead of persisting with this little
diversion.
--
Neil Williams
the
point somewhere.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpUjJZpyIEXk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
or require
rebuilds using g++-4.5 merely to use the optional compiler.
Stable releases need a stable toolchain with known bugs, not a
comparatively untested optional compiler with compatibility issues
against the existing binary packages available in Squeeze.
--
Neil Williams
=
http
volunteer whilst I sort out a point release for
Emdebian Lenny and prepare for an Emdebian release alongside Squeeze.
Thus my question: which of the three options would be ok from the RT
point of view and please our users most?
Please wait for comments from others before proceeding.
--
Neil
be migrated to testing?
Thanks.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgp6WJbAQgyEW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to be working around the problem in libarchive, rather
than fixing it, so I'm really asking whether a binNMU of reprepro is the
best solution to #418637.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpjOQbWHTY6O.pgp
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:48:30 +0200
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Neil,
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 08:36:45PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Regarding #418637.
I've prepared a new release of deb-gview which Build-Depends on
libarchive-dev. libarchive1 has been replaced
with this patch to revert to
libarchive1 or can I have your permission to upload the NMU to the
delayed queue (or even direct to unstable) this week instead of next?
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
diff
Please can a rebuild be scheduled for glipper on mips so that glipper
can migrate to testing? Thanks.
# 61 days old (needed 10 days)
# out of date on mips: glipper (from 0.95.1-2)
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http
architectures?
Do I need to create an RC bug on libhandoff to stop it migrating into
testing in a couple of days when it is not available on all
architectures? I thought that was more-or-less automatic.
Thanks.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com
this macro in configure.ac has not changed from the previous
version (0.72-3) which built successfully on all arches prior to the
transition that needed v0.90 to fix. intltool is available so I'm not
sure what has gone wrong with the m68k build.
Can gpe-calendar be retried on m68k please?
--
Neil
?
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpTlf67O6jjC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 20:24:25 +0200
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Neil Williams [Sat, 25 Aug 2007 19:12:22 +0100]:
amd64 has had this successful rebuild:
gpe-contacts (0.46-2+b1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Binary-only non-maintainer upload for amd64; no source changes
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libctapimkt
Closes RC bug #606265
Source: libctapimkt
Version: 1.0.1-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org
Date: Tue
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package towitoko
Closes RC bug #557495
Source: towitoko
Version: 2.0.7-8.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org
Date: Tue, 07
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:40:19 +
Closes: 602332 605139
Changes:
emdebian-grip (2.2.7+i18n) unstable; urgency=low
.
* [INTL:fr] French translation (manpages) (Closes: #605139)
* [INTL:ca] update catalonian translation (Closes: #602332
nana ncurses-hexedit
ocrad opt readline5 rplay scm teseq time trueprint tua ulog-acctd
uucp xzgv yafc yiyantang zgv
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpEqAdolmZO2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
testing (pbuilder):
Source: curl
Version: 7.21.0-1.1
Distribution: testing-proposed-updates
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:10:56 +
Closes: 594150
Changes:
curl (7.21.0-1.1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer
configuration.)
It works but I'd be happier if someone could explain what is actually
happening and why
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpzMDdJpGCsi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:44:47 +
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 21:29 +, Neil Williams wrote:
I've tidied up the patch which turns this silent error into a more
noisy warning but does not try to fix the underlying issue. The
patch is based
severity 594150 important
tag 594150 fixed-upstream
thanks
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:25:47 +0530
Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan rkrish...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org
wrote:
I'm still dubious about this whole bug/patch - especially
at initialization time:
It would be very useful to have a test case piece of code from the
original use case too.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgp1MFuPPwfnC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
is simply bust and
trying to link against things in the wrong way (hence complaints about
relocate). Nothing to do with the -dbg package.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpzXf5pTvw3I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
I haven't got a way of testing the package once built and nobody has
offered test results.
Julien noted that the package should be removed, however that message
went against a different bug
to remove ohai and chef from Squeeze. This bug
doesn't warrant blocking Squeeze.
I'll file those two tomorrow unless someone comes up with a patch for
ohai (or the release team decide to add the hints anyway).
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpLVPvIcQBWP.pgp
changes).
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpQCPtqlzO8q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
I'm also filing an RM request for ohai due to RC bug
596351. chef is a reverse dependency which needs to be
removed at the same time.
Please remove chef from testing.
See
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596351#60
Please remove ohai from testing (similar bug filed to remove chef as well).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT
gnome-pilot has cleared NEW? (Neither package can
migrate without the other as migrating new gnome-pilot will break
installations of existing gnome-pilot-conduits.)
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpDevNjH6ZkE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
questions to the debian-user list. Release is not the
right forum for this discussion.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpWuNhZDVEFr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, zlib1g (= 1:1.1.4)
(imagemagick-extra has the depends on libwmf)
Would the best solution here be to binNMU libtiff to close #634194 and
then reassign #634550 for an imagemagick binNMU?
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgppV8ZFxEFc3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
: No such file or directory
bug report being filed...
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpMhL1iJrXiL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 12:48:01 +0200
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 09:33:59 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 00:06:42 +0200
Richard B. Kreckel krec...@ginac.de wrote:
Hi!
I realize this must be a FAQ, but I still need a little
to be a mirror of the Emdebian suites.
At some point, I'll contact the www team to sort out support in
packages.d.o and qa.d.o.
How does this sound to you?
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgp8AeJuOcFVj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
are the reverse dependencies which still expect it to be
available on architectures where it cannot actually build or function.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpAPTI4lEn2K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
. This might need to be arranged with ftp-master and
involves two (almost identical) uploads.
Preferences? Alternatives?
I'm suspecting that 0 is the right choice but I want to be sure before
I write the code.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpSpOUet41KC.pgp
become useless due
to external
Would it be feasible to address this somehow in stable? Please
forgive my ignorance.
See #577760 which would be the correct solution.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgp1eyPw9XysV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
know if this is OK to upload.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
diffstat for frei0r_1.1.22git20091109-1.1 frei0r_1.1.22git20091109-1.2
frei0r-1.1.22git20091109/debian/changelog | 10 ++
frei0r-1.1.22git20091109/debian/control |1 +
frei0r
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 11:23:47 +0100
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Neil.
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (03/03/2012):
There is an RFS but it doesn't look ready and includes lots more
changes than just fixing the FTBFS.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/02
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package alsa-base for the RC bug fix
just uploaded for #673679.
The complicating factor here is the udeb. alsa-drivers
provides the old alsa-base udeb in testing which is
-dev, glutg3-dev, libgtkglext1-dev,
libxmu-dev
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpInqJl8Ku93.pgp
Description: PGP signature
http://incoming.debian.org/dpkg-cross_2.3.0.1_amd64.changes
Source: dpkg-cross
Version: 2.3.0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:22:41 +0100
Closes: 497234 502108
Changes:
dpkg-cross (2.3.0.1) unstable; urgency=low
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:29:17 +0100
Neil McGovern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:47:42AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
http://incoming.debian.org/dpkg-cross_2.3.0.1_amd64.changes
+ $(RM) Debian::DpkgCross.3
?
While fixing the translations, I discovered a bug
checking its existance
+(Closes: #502760)
+
+ -- Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:07:23 +
+
libnss-ldap (261-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Updated nl.po Closes: #469175
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 16:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Neil Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081104 16:03]:
http://incoming.debian.org/libnss-ldap_261-2.1_amd64.changes
I doubt that this changes is correct, because /etc/init.d/nscd is an
conffile and isn't removed during remove but only
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gpm/news/20081130T004706Z.html
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=470882#239
plus one addition change to debian/rules to clean up the Makefile to
allow the package to build twice in a row (release goal).
--
Neil Williams
=
http
; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Remove non-free smarty logo included in package (Closes: #507316)
+
+ -- Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:52:16
+ +
smarty (2.6.20-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- smarty-2.6.20
prepared an emdebian-archive-keyring-udeb package if that is
helpful - it currently Conflicts: with and Provides:
debian-archive-keyring-udeb and consists of the d-a-k-udeb plus the
emdebian key.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:59:11 +0100
Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Neil Williams wrote:
When the Lenny freeze started, I wasn't in any position to consider an
Emdebian release based on Lenny, I was expecting to get the tools into
Lenny and release with Squeeze. However, the delays
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:54:13 +0100
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote:
* Neil Williams [Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:59:47 +]:
OK, time for an update on this. At the Debian-UK BSP, I had a chance to
discuss the issues in detail with Phil Hands with regard to pre-seeding
d-i to handle the key
: Good signature from Emdebian Archive Signing Key
gpg: Signature made Sun 15 Feb 2009 08:17:24 GMT using DSA key ID 28BCB3E3
gpg: Good signature from Neil Williams (Debian) codeh...@debian.org
gpg: aka Neil Williams (CodeHelp) li...@codehelp.co.uk
gpg: aka N Williams
emdebian-tools appears to still be frozen - could it be unblocked
please so that 1.5.0 can migrate into testing?
Thanks.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpUekqFNzkRf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
