keras orphaned

Dear Debian Science, I have unfortunately decided to orphan keras and related packages, as there are errors with the latest numpy that I cannot resolve, and upstream no longer maintains this software as an independent package from TensorFlow, so it is EOL as far as compatibility with Theano is

Re: Salvaging keras - unpushed commits?

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 5:21 PM Andrius Merkys wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, 16:48 Andreas Tille, wrote: >> >> seems Stephen is not active. If I where you I'd push the uploaded state >> to Git and upload the latest upstream version. > > > Thanks for suggestion - I will take

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

lsa master. regards, Steve On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:43 PM Stephen Sinclair wrote: > > I have disabled the test on salsa, but I am not sure the software will > succeed on arm64. Actually I am quite curious, as my attempts to > compile on my Raspberry Pi did not get as far as running

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

elcome! > > There is a build problem on arm64 "96 - ContactTest (Timeout)". Please > fix or disable this > only test. I have restarted the build but it did not succeed. > > Regards > > Anton > > Am So., 24. Jan. 2021 um 17:54 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair >

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

55b54e6e953dc > > Best regards > > Anton > > Am Sa., 23. Jan. 2021 um 14:48 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair > : > > > > Hi Anton, > > > > Thanks, last time I tried to use the salsa pipeline for this package, > > it was not possible because the build produ

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

to build currently [1]. Could you please take a look and let me know, > whether it is ready to be uploaded. > > Thanks > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/siconos/-/pipelines > > Anton > > Am Mi., 20. Jan. 2021 um 22:46 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair > :

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

Hello, If there still is time, there is a minor version upstream update to the siconos package looking for a sponsor: https://mentors.debian.net/package/siconos/ siconos (4.3.1+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release. * Rebase patches: + Remove upstreamed patch to

RFS: siconos 4.3.0+dfsg-2

regards, Stephen Sinclair

Re: RFS: siconos 4.3.0+dfsg-1

Thanks very much Anton, appreciated ;) Steve On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:18 PM Anton Gladky wrote: > > Uploaded. Thanks for your contribution! > > Anton > > Am Sa., 26. Sept. 2020 um 18:11 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair > > : > > > > Hi Anton, > > >

Re: RFS: siconos 4.3.0+dfsg-1

Hi Anton, Sorry to nudge, but have you had a chance to look at the package? I just did a rebuild after upgrading my unstable schroot today and it still seems to build and passes autopkgtest, so I feel confident. kind regards, Steve On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 12:33 PM Stephen Sinclair wrote

Re: RFS: siconos 4.3.0+dfsg-1

Thank you Anton, much appreciated. Open to any comments. kind regards, Steve On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 8:20 PM Anton Gladky wrote: > > Hello, > > I will take care of it. > > > Anton > > > Am Di., 8. Sept. 2020 um 08:55 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair > : >>

RFS: siconos 4.3.0+dfsg-1

Dear Debian Science members, I am looking for a sponsor for this update to the Siconos package. I was unfortunately unable to find a sponsor (on mentors) when I made the initial update for the 4.3.0 upstream release, but after finding and fixing some recent problems due to updates in

lasagne and keras

Hello Debian Science members, These two packages are having trouble, lasagne more than keras. lasagne has an autopkgtest bug that I have been so far unable to fix: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962938 As a result the package has been marked for autoremoval from testing. I

RFS: keras/2.3.1+dfsg-2 [RC] -- deep learning framework running on Theano or TensorFlow

in Debian. Please read: https://github.com/keras-team/keras/releases/tag/2.4.0 This update fixes a small problem with a test due to updates to python3-h5py. Regards, -- Stephen Sinclair

Re: RFS: lasagne update

Cheers, thank you Anton! Steve On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 8:55 PM Anton Gladky wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > I have reviewed this package, made some more minor changes and > uploaded it. > > Thanks for contribution! > > Anton > > > Am Do., 30. Apr. 2020 u

RFS: lasagne update

Hello science team, I am looking for a sponsor for the deep learning package lasagne. The package has been updated on salsa and is passing build and test: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/lasagne/pipelines/131520 Currently it is blocking numpy migration so I sped up my work on this update

Re: RFS: keras, keras-applications, keras-preprocessing

work, why to loose it at least right > now > > Thanks for contribution! > > Anton > > Am Di., 14. Apr. 2020 um 15:51 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair > : > > > > Hi Anton, > > > > Thanks for checking the package. > > > > On Tue, Apr 14,

Re: RFS: keras, keras-applications, keras-preprocessing

th theano also being end of life things are looking shaky. regards, Steve > Am Sa., 21. März 2020 um 15:40 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair > : > > > > Dear Science team, > > > > I decided to check up on my packages and found that there are errors > > t

RFS: keras, keras-applications, keras-preprocessing

Dear Science team, I decided to check up on my packages and found that there are errors that have cropped up due to recent updates to Python and GCC. I noticed that they will be autoremoved from testing soon, so I am looking for a sponsor to upload some updates. In particular keras and siconos,

Re: numerical comparisons or not? (platform compatibility during testing)

Thanks Aaron, On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 2:45 PM Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > Stephen Sinclair writes: > > > It could be the way.. but since this would possibly require some > > tuning, is there a way to test on different buildd platforms before > > the package is act

Re: numerical comparisons or not? (platform compatibility during testing)

t it would be nice to be able to test different thresholds before bothering sponsors. Steve > Am Di., 18. Feb. 2020 um 16:24 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair > : > > > > Hi folks, > > > > I've got my package, siconos, working nicely now on the platform I use it > >

numerical comparisons or not? (platform compatibility during testing)

Hi folks, I've got my package, siconos, working nicely now on the platform I use it on (amd64) but some inspection of the build logs has revealed that buildd fails on all other platforms. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=siconos=sid=yes In fact it does build fine, but the software

Re: please review siconos package

Hello, Would any one be able to review this package for me? I have fixed a couple of things and verified that autopkgtests work since sending this original email. kind regards, Steve On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 1:52 PM Stephen Sinclair wrote: > > Hello science team, > > As previously

please review siconos package

Hello science team, As previously mentioned I have been developing a package for Siconos, a C++ framework for numerical simulation of non-smooth dynamical systems. I would like to know if anyone would be willing to review this package as it stands. The package is here:

Re: Aborting all plan about deep learning frameworks.

It's true that this field is rapidly moving these days and it's hard to keep up with upstream releases. My interest in taking the Keras and Lasagne packages was mainly to help provide stable and well-tested targets for these APIs, as well as to learn about packaging. Two things that surprised me

Re: running CI tests before package sponsorship

Hello, Thanks for the response. Indeed unit tests are already running during package build on my local machine and I use autopkgtest to test the installed packages for proper functioning. However this only allows me to test on x86_64. My concern was more that I was under the impression that

running CI tests before package sponsorship

Dear Debian Science, Is it possible to do CI testing on a package build in a salsa repository that has not yet been uploaded? I am getting ready to propose a package that features a lot of numerical tests in its test suite and I am afraid of hitting many unknown numerical errors on the variety of

Re: need repositories for keras subprojects

On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Lumin wrote: > Hi Stephen, > >> I am updating the keras package and the newest release of keras 2.2.0 >> now depends on some modules that have been broken off upstream into >> separate tarballs, namely "keras-applications" and >> "keras-preprocessing". >> >> So I

need repositories for keras subprojects

Hello, I am updating the keras package and the newest release of keras 2.2.0 now depends on some modules that have been broken off upstream into separate tarballs, namely "keras-applications" and "keras-preprocessing". So I am making corresponding packages for these. Would someone be able to

Re: Bug#894128: Acknowledgement (RFS: fclib/3.0.0 -- read and write problems in the Frictional Contact Library format)

he tarball using watch-file: >>> uscan --force-download >> >> Fixed. >> >>> 3) Apply cme fix dpkg >> >> Done. >> >>> Please fix those issues and I will upload the package. >> >> Thank you very much! >> >> Steve >

Re: netlib templates copyrights

ill hoping they will update the archive, but otherwise I could forward the email granting permission to this mailing list (it is quite general) in order to have a public record, but I am not sure if that's necessary. Steve On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Stephen Sinclair <radars...@gmail.com>

Re: netlib templates copyrights

of those files? > > Regards > > Anton > > > 2018-04-05 18:02 GMT+02:00 Stephen Sinclair <radars...@gmail.com>: >> Hello science team, >> >> The software I am packaging embeds dftemplates and dctemplates from netlib: >> >> http://www.netlib.org/t

netlib templates copyrights

Hello science team, The software I am packaging embeds dftemplates and dctemplates from netlib: http://www.netlib.org/templates/index.html It is clear from the context that this is code to accompany a book and intended to be used by the readers. However, I cannot find an explicit copyright,

Re: Bug#894128: Acknowledgement (RFS: fclib/3.0.0 -- read and write problems in the Frictional Contact Library format)

? > 2) I am not able to download the tarball using watch-file: > uscan --force-download Fixed. > 3) Apply cme fix dpkg Done. > Please fix those issues and I will upload the package. Thank you very much! Steve > 2018-03-26 18:54 GMT+02:00 Stephen Sinclair <radars...@gma

Fwd: Bug#894128: Acknowledgement (RFS: fclib/3.0.0 -- read and write problems in the Frictional Contact Library format)

b regards, Steve -- Forwarded message -- From: Debian Bug Tracking System <ow...@bugs.debian.org> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 1:27 PM Subject: Bug#894128: Acknowledgement (RFS: fclib/3.0.0 -- read and write problems in the Frictional Contact Library format) To: Stephen

Re: project creation on salsa

ib > > Regards > > Anton > > > 2018-03-20 21:11 GMT+01:00 Stephen Sinclair <radars...@gmail.com>: >> Hello, >> >> I am packaging fclib [1], an API in C for read/writing files in a >> format for a collection of frictional contact problems.

project creation on salsa

Hello, I am packaging fclib [1], an API in C for read/writing files in a format for a collection of frictional contact problems. I have a package ready locally, and would like to put it on Salsa before filing my ITP and requesting sponsorship. As I would like to propose it for Debian Science, I

Re: Fwd: RFS: boost-numeric-bindings/0.99-1 [ITP] -- Numeric Library Bindings for Boost

bindings target are extremely slow moving (LAPACK, BLAS, etc.), therefore the libraries should not be expected to take a lot of maintenance. That said I will work on getting unit tests working. regards, Steve > On 08/11/17 01:21, Stephen Sinclair wrote: >> >> Dear Debian Science main

Fwd: RFS: boost-numeric-bindings/0.99-1 [ITP] -- Numeric Library Bindings for Boost

my package of the boost numerics_bindings C++ headers that wrap many numeric libraries. I am reviving someone's old work on this package and am proposing it for inclusion in Debian Science. regards, Steve -- Forwarded message -- From: Stephen Sinclair <radars...@gmail.com>

question how to handle missing files, pulling in external files for documentation

Hi, I have been working on an updated package for Keras and aimed to do the following: (1) update to the latest version, (2) add a documentation package. Some issues came up that I wanted to ask before pushing a new upstream branch. Another thread mentioned that PyPI is preferred as the

Bug#852133: ITA: keras -- deep learning framework running on Theano or TensorFlow

One can check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/keras.git Changes since the last upload: * Change maintainer to Debian Science, uploader to Stephen Sinclair (Closes: #852133). * Change Section to python. * Add gbp.conf

Re: Keras (abstraction layer for Theano and TensorFlow) seeks for an adopter

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 31/10/17 16:11, Stephen Sinclair wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 31/

Re: Keras (abstraction layer for Theano and TensorFlow) seeks for an adopter

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 31/10/17 13:15, Stephen Sinclair wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>

Re: Keras (abstraction layer for Theano and TensorFlow) seeks for an adopter

Hello, On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Would that time be better spent on the Tensorflow / Keras combo, which is > arguably significantly more popular in research? I am afraid we are already > spreading our packaging efforts thin on the machine

Re: question on adding licenses from code website

not know of that possibility. regards, Steve On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Afif Elghraoui <a...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, Steve, > > على الجمعـة 6 كانون الثاني 2017 ‫06:24، كتب Stephen Sinclair: >> Hello, >> >> I mentioned previously that I'm interested in packagin

question on adding licenses from code website

Hello, I mentioned previously that I'm interested in packaging a few bits of numerical code available from some university websites that we depend on. One is LUMOD from Stanford, and I stated that it had no license. I've now been informed that I missed a page on their site where the license is

packaging Siconos

Dear Debian Science team, I am working on an open source (Apache2 license) numerical simulation engine for non-smooth dynamical systems which is called Siconos: http://siconos.gforge.inria.fr Lately we have been motivated to package it for Debian Sid, and I think the Debian Science team is the