On 4/18/2013 11:56 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
I don't think uptime challenges are useful. It makes people want to
do something that they shouldn't want to do.
Uptime is about continuous availability and reliability of
infrastructure, systems, and software, with least disruption to users,
and
On 4/17/2013 1:10 AM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 schrieb Tixy:
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 22:59 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Linux greer 3.2.6 #1 SMP Mon Feb 20 17:05:10 CST 2012 i686 GNU/Linux
22:35:31 up 412 days, 10:05, 1 user, load average: 1.18, 0.97, 0.44
So you
Linux greer 3.2.6 #1 SMP Mon Feb 20 17:05:10 CST 2012 i686 GNU/Linux
22:35:31 up 412 days, 10:05, 1 user, load average: 1.18, 0.97, 0.44
--
Stan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 4/15/2013 1:44 PM, Dexter Filmore wrote:
Am Wednesday 10 April 2013 23:54:28 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 4/10/2013 12:32 PM, Dexter Filmore wrote:
Am Wednesday 10 April 2013 18:05:08 schrieb Ross Boylan:
You cannot get more than about 200MB/s out of a RAID1 setup, not even
with
15krpm SAS
On 4/10/2013 9:15 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
actually what i need is 4GB LAN throughput with teaming (802.3ad) for data
storage to backup VMs and same huge data manipulations will be done. so
just confused if it going to work or not.
Addressing the bonded ethernet issue:
802.3ad LACP
On 4/10/2013 12:32 PM, Dexter Filmore wrote:
Am Wednesday 10 April 2013 18:05:08 schrieb Ross Boylan:
You cannot get more than about 200MB/s out of a RAID1 setup, not even
with
15krpm SAS drives. the RAID1 will never be faster than a single disk.
How
would it.
It can read faster than a
On 4/3/2013 7:00 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
Are there any readily available, inexpensive (US$200-500), NAS (Network
Attached Storage) boxes in the 1-3TB capacity that are capable of
running Debian and NFS?
I'm looking for a device that can export a RAID-1, either ext4 or ZFS,
capacity in the
On 4/2/2013 1:02 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
i am about to build a centralized storage and i want some auto detect
(where no requirement of drivers and high performance capability) LAN card
for our server.
Intel i350-T4
On 4/2/2013 10:33 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 4/2/2013 1:02 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
i am about to build a centralized storage and i want some auto detect
(where no requirement of drivers and high performance capability) LAN card
for our server.
Intel i350-T4
http://www.intel.com
On 4/1/2013 12:03 AM, egam...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Stan,
Thank you for your reply.
No, I do not have the card for now. Just planning to buy a
dual port Gigabit PCI-e Ethernet card.
The Intel cards are always cheaper, work out-of-the-box with the stock
Intel drivers in Squeeze
On 4/1/2013 9:59 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
i have been working on Postfix dovecot etc for couple of months and
suddenly my my management ask the question that they want to sync mobile
device calendar along with i map. i am sure about IMAP i can implement this
with no issues but calendar
On 3/29/2013 10:33 PM, Eric Gamess wrote:
I am planning to install a HP NC380T Dual Port PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet
Card (374443-001) in our Debian 6.0.6 computer.
Do you already have it? What do you plan to use it for? Dual GbE
suggests high bandwidth and/or redundancy requirements.
I have no
On 3/23/2013 4:01 PM, Glenn English wrote:
I installed wheezy on one of the LAN hosts yesterday. Everything else is
squeeze, including my amanda backup machine. Amanda kept saying my wheezy box
wasn't working:
WARNING: sbox.slsware.lan: selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK
On 3/18/2013 3:57 AM, Casper Langemeijer wrote:
If I ifup both eth0 and eth1, ifconfig shows both interfaces. No
difference between output for them. (except ip/mac of course) The
counters get reset every few seconds for the broken eth0. Also: ethtool
shows nothing out off the ordinary except
On 3/18/2013 2:44 PM, Casper Langemeijer wrote:
On 03/18/2013 02:23 PM, Casper Langemeijer wrote:
It gets even more weird: I had the NIC daughter card replaced, and the
problem still exists. I think I will use the machine in production as
it is now. Since I'm not using 4 ethernet ports, for
On 3/17/2013 10:34 AM, Casper Langemeijer wrote:
Which has alway been my understanding of it until so far. But I like to
repeat from my first email: I tried the debian installer again, but
even then it's not able to get a DHCP IP address using eth0. eth1 is
working fine. This is after a cold
Hi Paul,
Don't know if you remember me. I helped you get your wireless working
up there on the mountain, quite some time ago.
On 3/15/2013 5:45 PM, Paul E Condon wrote:
I think I have an OK understanding of the 'theory' of samba,
but something is not working in practice.
There's not much
On 3/13/2013 8:00 PM, Brad Alexander wrote:
...
play with ...
features ...like f2fs and btrfs.
...
I was wondering if anyone is running any of them, and if they are stable
enough for day-to-day use.
I see a major disconnect here. Playing with something new is not
day-day use. You can buy a
On 3/12/2013 7:30 PM, Curt Howland wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling j...@aenertia.net
wrote:
Just out of curiosity why are you not using KVM? It is better, faster,
and integrated with the kernel. virt-manager is more than capable tool
for provisioning VM's.
On 3/7/2013 11:20 AM, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
Hey guys,
Anyone out there happen to have Debian running on a HP BL460c G8 blade
with the FlexFabric 2-port adapter? We're running Debian squeeze and
have issues with the P420 Smart Array that required a backported kernel
(kmuto d-i build) to get
On 2/24/2013 7:41 AM, Tixy wrote:
Actually, I just double checked, and my CPU [1] does have PAE after all.
PAE is in every AMD/Intel chip manufactured post 1998. You'd have to be
using a Pentium MMX, AMD K6-2, or older chip, to lack PAE support.
The general rule here: if the chip clock is
On 2/3/2013 8:56 AM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I am using Oracle VirtualBox (v 4.2.6 r82870) as a testbed for Wheezy
Testing before upgrading my production linux computer. The software is
installed on my 64 bit Dell Inspiron laptop with 8 GB of RAM running MS Win
7 Professional as the
On 1/30/2013 6:54 AM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
Hi,
I had a problem that generated A LOT of messages in syslog and it grew untill
the entire /var partition had 0 bytes free.
The /var/log/syslog file was over 4GB large. I deleted it using a simple rm
/var/log/syslog command and the file is
On 1/19/2013 3:41 AM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Thanks for detailed informations, I was suggesting some of them
(instruction sets and range of registers, but did not known about the
new GPRs), but did not had the knowledge to explain things as nicely as
you.
I would like to
Given the recent threads regarding 32 vs 64 bit I thought I'd take a
moment to present information often omitted in responses to these posts.
First, the i386 kernel/user space have access to only the original 8
general purpose registers of the 80386 ISA that are 32 bits wide, and
cannot generally
On 1/18/2013 6:37 AM, lina wrote:
It is my /home/lina/try directory.
Honest speaking, I even didn't know when it showed up. And for those
files inside, it looks so strange for me. might some Fortran code? or
something.
$ cd try/
-bash: cd: try/: Permission denied
I don't feel so
On 1/16/2013 10:35 PM, lina wrote:
Hi,
I don't know how to scroll down in htop, for 128 processors.
What system do you possess that has 128 cores/hardware threads? HP
DL980? Supermicro 5086B-TRF? What are you using it for? That's a
tremendous amount of horsepower...
Please reply-all so I
On 1/17/2013 9:53 PM, lina wrote:
On Friday 18,January,2013 11:18 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
What system do you possess that has 128 cores/hardware threads? HP
DL980? Supermicro 5086B-TRF? What are you using it for? That's a
tremendous amount of horsepower...
I can't find the answer
On 1/17/2013 11:57 PM, Doug wrote:
What happens if you do rm -rf /try from root?
(I/m not all that familiar with Deb, but you must
have some way to get admin permission, if you
are the owner of the install. su or perhaps sudo.)
If this pertains to the 8-way box, it's not running Debian, but
On 1/18/2013 1:29 AM, lina wrote:
Anyone has some idea about how to set 4 columns like this?
http://htop.sourceforge.net/htop-64.png
$ man htop
F2, S
Setup screen. There you can configure meters displayed on
the top side of the screen, as well as set various display
On 12/22/2012 2:30 AM, Daniel Dalton wrote:
I've installed debian with a separate /home partition on my samsung 830
series ssd drive.
I would like to verify partition alignment is correct though.
Regardless of what you've read on the interwebs, there is no such thing
as proper or improper
On 12/10/2012 11:03 PM, lina wrote:
Let's say, I have some .tex which will generate more than 100 pages in PDF.
The pdflatex consume a bit longer to finish in one core.
Here I have physical 4 cores with virtual 4.
I wonder whether or how can make it fast.
In my situation, if I
On 12/7/2012 5:48 PM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
A RAID-1 will outperform
a parity-based RAID using the same disks every time, due to calculating the
parity.
This hasn't been true for almost a decade. Even the slowest of modern
single core x86 CPUs have plenty of excess horsepower for soft RAID
On 12/5/2012 5:54 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
The ultimate goal should be to be able to have some sort of log database
for troubleshooting purposes containing the analyzed mail log files of
the last X days/weeks on which a query could be done for a message id, a
from or to address, some
On 12/4/2012 9:50 PM, s0lid wrote:
Im not sure if this was discussed before but is there an application that
is like microsoft exchange(Mail, Calendar, and contacts). The whole suite
not just the mail server.
This software class is called groupware. The term has been around for
15 years or
On 12/3/2012 1:23 AM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
Yes, I had intended to get 1600 MHz memory as a replacement, but I
accidentally got the 1333. If I add additional memory I realize that I
will have to used 1333 for that, as well, unless I replace all of it.
Unless you have an integrated GPU that
On 12/1/2012 5:34 PM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
I'm calling this case settled. I went back to Fry's today and returned
the second kit of Patriot Memory. I got a store creidit and went back
to pick out new memory. Fry's does not carry Micron memory, and only
occasionally has Crucial. They were
On 11/28/2012 9:14 AM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
On 11/27/2012 11:09 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 11/27/2012 11:29 PM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
Gigabyte 970A-DS3 MB
8GB (2x4GB) Patriot G3 RAM
The DIMMS are 1600. According to the BIOS the CPU Timing is at 200 and
the memory is at x8.0
On 11/27/2012 11:29 PM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
Last weekend I put together a new box to replace the one that has been
locking up repeatedly. The components are:
Gigabyte 970A-DS3 MB
8GB (2x4GB) Patriot G3 RAM
AMD FX-4100 Quad Core CPU
ASUS DVD/CD Writer
MSI R5450
On 11/6/2012 9:51 AM, Martin McCormick wrote:
Is there any utility that will move the heads on a
floppy drive from one stop to the other? I needed to write a
floppy on an old system and discovered that the drive's head
moving hardware has gotten stiff with disuse. It gets better the
On 11/6/2012 11:34 AM, Martin McCormick wrote:
Stan Hoeppner writes:
#!/bin/bash
count=0
while [ $count -le 100 ]; do
dd if=/dev/fd0 of=/dev/null count=1 skip=1
dd if=/dev/fd0 of=/dev/null count=1 skip=2940
let count=count+1
done
Thanks! That appears to be doing the job. Time
On 11/6/2012 10:08 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
What I do know is that lack of microcode update support is a severe issue
IMO.
Debian has survived and functioned very well with good stability, all
the while lacking microcode update capability for all these years. This
doesn't seem
On 11/4/2012 10:42 AM, Dr Beco wrote:
With so many processors out there, each one installed in a different
system with different amount of RAM, kinds of disks (normal, SSD,
flash, etc.), a benchmark like linpack came to fill a gap when
comparing systems (not only processors).
That is
On 11/2/2012 7:44 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Well with ARM getting more performant the differences might blur.
Yes, which is the fact that started this discussion.
What is a tablet? What is a desktop? If there are already attempts to make
regular computer displays touchable for example.
On 11/2/2012 9:56 PM, Charles Kroeger wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:30:02 +0100
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Now if they'd just smarten up
I've pondered this sort of thing my whole adult life. I don't understand
everything
you're saying here but it sounds pretty straight
On 11/3/2012 2:32 AM, Neal Murphy wrote:
On Saturday, November 03, 2012 01:47:40 AM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Motorola 680x0, DEC Alpha, SGI MIPS, HP PA-RISC, Motorola/IBM PowerPC,
Sun SPARC, Cray Vector, Intel Itanium (irony here).
You missed Moto's 88K
I didn't include the 88K because its
On 11/2/2012 12:05 AM, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
SSD like samsung 840 (TLC) only has 1k write times. Swap directly on it
would not be horrible?
Your question I presume: Is SSD suitable for a swap partition?
Answer: Yes, all SSDs are much faster than mechanical HDD for swap duty
Reason:
On 11/1/2012 1:23 AM, David Baron wrote:
I get as far as the USB ports.
From there I can get into a root-shell where I must vgmknodes to get my lvm
volumes mounted!
Various other inits like USB capabilities, network (cannot find eth2
device!),
etc., rc.local, are not executed. Problem
On 11/2/2012 7:16 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
And thus I say, that I better use a dual core CPU with higher peak
performance for typical desktop workloads, than a quad core CPU with lower
peak performance. A quad core CPU with as high peak performance might be
in order if something
On 11/2/2012 7:27 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
But granted I find it a pity that soo much variety of CPU platforms has
gone already.
Yes, a shame. A short list of some CPU archs that have been pushed out
of the market or severely marginalized by x86,
On 10/31/2012 7:56 PM, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:01:40 -0500
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Why didn't you purchase a self encrypting SSD? Eliminates all of these
issues. Lots of them available today.
Price? Doing a quick check on Newegg, the cheapest SSDs
On 11/1/2012 11:42 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Montag, 29. Oktober 2012 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
For powerful laptops and power saving desktops I think Intel
Sandybridge/Ivybridge is best bet currently - except for the
political dimension.
Sure, but 90% of users don't need powerful
On 10/30/2012 8:01 AM, John Hasler wrote:
Stan Hoeppner writes:
No, I mean millions [of ARM cpus]. One billion chips per year would
equal 1 for every 7 humans on the planet, and that's simply
impossible. Over 3 billion people have never used an electronic
device. That's almost half
On 10/30/2012 8:05 AM, John Hasler wrote:
Stan Hoeppner writes:
At this point in time, and in the foreseeable, the only way to crack
into the desktop market is with a new x86 chip that has sufficiently
compelling advantages over both Intel and AMD. And since one must
have a license from
On 10/30/2012 12:02 PM, Celejar wrote:
As I have said, I don't have a deep understanding of these issues, but
one apparent flaw in your argument is that IBM, Motorola and DEC
weren't moving billions of their chips independently of their push into
the desktop market, as ARM is.
What's
On 10/30/2012 11:58 AM, Celejar wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/10/30/amd_to_partner_with_arm_for_server_cpus/
Just saw that, too:
Do note that the SeaMicro acquisition was announced in March. Before
the acquisition every SeaMicro product used Intel chips, from hot
running Xeons to
On 10/30/2012 10:44 PM, Charles Kroeger wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:50:02 +0100
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
If enough people buy AMD then Intel has a strong competitor. This keeps
the marketplace healthy and keeps Chipzilla from becoming a total
monopoly WRT x86
On 10/31/2012 4:48 AM, Jochen Spieker wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
So again, ARM will never reach the desktop, nor succeed, without full
ISV support. Which, as I stated previously, is why ARM will only have a
chance on the desktop if the consumer conditions are right to launch an
Android based PC
On 10/31/2012 5:46 PM, Christian Stalp wrote:
Hello out there,
I want to prepare my new ssd as an encrypted fs. In order to do that I
took a reasonably new version of the network-installer and created:
first an ext3 partition to hold the kernel. Then one MB of free space
(the debian-installer
On 10/30/2012 4:16 AM, Joe wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 23:02:58 -0500
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
No, I mean millions. One billion chips per year would equal 1 for
every 7 humans on the planet, and that's simply impossible. Over 3
billion people have never used an electronic
On 10/30/2012 7:19 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 29 oct 12, 21:06:36, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
The second big reason is that neither Microsoft nor ISVs will profit
from a non x86 CPU architecture entering the desktop space. Supporting
ARM would simply cost them money. So there's no incentive
On 10/29/2012 1:15 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Sonntag, 28. Oktober 2012 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 10/28/2012 4:38 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 27 oct 12, 22:27:30, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Coming from a 2800+ which is a ~60 watt CPU, and given the fact
you'll never make use of more than
On 10/29/2012 6:08 PM, Celejar wrote:
Interesting. Google shows that there was a thread on /. a year ago
about the question of ARM on the desktop, but a quick skim shows no
obviously compelling reason why it won't ever happen. Thoughts?
There a dozens of reasons. First and foremost, ARM
On 10/29/2012 9:17 PM, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 21:06:36 -0500
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 10/29/2012 6:08 PM, Celejar wrote:
Interesting. Google shows that there was a thread on /. a year ago
about the question of ARM on the desktop, but a quick skim shows
On 10/28/2012 4:38 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 27 oct 12, 22:27:30, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Coming from a 2800+ which is a ~60 watt CPU, and given the fact you'll
never make use of more than 2 of those 8 cores, I recommend a dual core
AthlonII X2 @ 3.4GHz. I have the 3GHz model and the 2nd
On 10/27/2012 7:29 PM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
I'm really getting annoyed by my random system lockups, so I have been
looking at new motherboards, new systems, etc.
...
I saw a Fry's add for a motherboard, an AMD 8 Core CPU and memory for
That's a 125 watt CPU (ouch!). That's two 60 watt
cheap and easy to implement.
--
Stan
On Oct 24, 2012, at 11:59 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 10/24/2012 8:54 AM, Zhong wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the second time I've send you this message but
regarding about my fan heating up, is there any known issue
CC'ing back to debian-users
On 10/25/2012 1:50 AM, s0lid wrote:
I just read the specs on the System x3650 M4 (sorry I din previously)
and it has the m5110e integrated on the mobo, and AFAICT no other
SAS/SATA ASIC. Thus the method I described for getting Debian and a
mainline kernel
On 10/25/2012 2:54 AM, Berni Elbourn wrote:
On 23/10/12 14:14, s0lid wrote:
Hi,
I have a new server IBM X3650 M4 with a raid controller ServeRaid
M5110e. I'm having a problem finding driver for this device. I tried
to install debian using the ISO from http://kmuto.jp/debian/d-i/ which
say
control issues. Which is why you
always reply to the list, not individuals.
--
Stan
Thanks.
On Oct 25, 2012, at 12:20 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 10/25/2012 12:06 AM, Zhong wrote:
The problem is, high temperature readings only occur in Debian but not
evident
On 10/24/2012 4:15 AM, s0lid wrote:
I actually have 5 of this new servers to replace my old ones. hmmm...
i can do that or can i use the testing branch of debian instead?
I just read the specs on the System x3650 M4 (sorry I din previously)
and it has the m5110e integrated on the mobo, and
On 10/24/2012 8:54 AM, Zhong wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the second time I've send you this message but
regarding about my fan heating up, is there any known issue surrounding the
Linux kernel on a similar problem such as mine?
Because much of my research on this topic either
On 10/23/2012 8:14 AM, s0lid wrote:
Hi,
I have a new server IBM X3650 M4 with a raid controller ServeRaid
M5110e. I'm having a problem finding driver for this device. I tried
to install debian using the ISO from http://kmuto.jp/debian/d-i/ which
say that it has the driver for the M5110e but
On 10/21/2012 10:10 AM, r...@microway.com wrote:
I think the correct driver should be mpt2sas. That should be available in
the regular kernel (no extra driver source needed), although I'm not sure
off hand if Debian's binary kernel package includes it.
mpt2sas is for LSI based SAS/SATA HBAs.
On 10/17/2012 8:18 AM, richie.jf@foxconn.com wrote:
First off, I own a couple of your socket AM3 M61PMP-K motherboards. The
CPU temp doesn't report correctly, which is not critical. Besides that
they work great and I'm pleased with them.
When we install Debian Etch(Kernel 2.6.24) on Intel
On 10/15/2012 10:41 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
Recently someone was chided for attempting installation from a CD.
Not all of us have convenient access to a high speed internet connection.
I can have limited access to high speed access by carrying one of my
laptops to the local library. I
On 10/13/2012 5:06 AM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
I am installing Debian 6.0.0 squeeze with kernel version
2.6.32-5-amd64 on Dell R720 2U server(
http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/products/pedge/dell-poweredge-r720-spec-sheet.pdf),
the installer is unable to detect the RAID Controller and NIC
On 10/13/2012 6:42 AM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 10/13/2012 5:06 AM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
I am installing Debian 6.0.0 squeeze with kernel version
2.6.32-5-amd64 on Dell R720 2U server(
http://www.dell.com
On 10/13/2012 8:12 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Saturday 13 October 2012 12:42:52 Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
What is the difference between drivers and firmware blobs.
I actually said binary blob. I would not have used the term firmware
blob. In fact, that is the first time that I have seen it used.
On 10/6/2012 7:43 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Stan Hoeppner
s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
This thread reinforces what experienced server admins round the world
have known forever:
DO NOT USE dynamic network address assignment on servers
On 10/6/2012 1:52 PM, Satoru Otsubo wrote:
Hi,
Stan
The problem in this thread is but one of many that can/will result from
using dynamic IP assignment with servers. If the OP had mentioned his
use of dynamic IP up front he would have saved himself, and the rest of
us, much time.
On 10/4/2012 12:06 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 10/4/2012 3:46 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Oct 3, 2012, at 8:40 PM, Satoru Otsubo wrote:
But the phenomena are same, that is,
When booting my PC, apache2 failed to start
This thread reinforces what experienced server admins round the world
have known forever:
DO NOT USE dynamic network address assignment on servers.
The problem in this thread is but one of many that can/will result from
using dynamic IP assignment with servers. If the OP had mentioned his
use
On 10/4/2012 3:46 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Oct 3, 2012, at 8:40 PM, Satoru Otsubo wrote:
But the phenomena are same, that is,
When booting my PC, apache2 failed to start.
And when I executed the following:
# /etc/init.d/apache2 restart
apache2 started successfully with the dual stack.
On 10/3/2012 9:08 AM, Satoru Otsubo wrote:
I'm Satoru Otsubo
I have some problems concerning apache2's handling of IP version 6.
My PC: Linux squeeze Japanese version clean install.
I use the normal apache2 package prepared by debian maintainers, that is, I
did not compile apache2.
On 10/1/2012 2:02 PM, Kelly Clowers wrote:
Agreed, if you where going to change the name, x86-64 makes the most
sense, is the most common name for it in the Linux community (MS users
tend to use x64, which is absurd), and is technically accurate.
Actually, x86-64 is no longer technically
On 9/30/2012 6:02 AM, Wolf Halton wrote:
How long after end-of-life of the itanium chip will Debian keep the port to
IA64?
There's no requirement, that I am aware of, that says Debian must wait
until EOL of a processor before dropping support for it.
Anyone have a link to the release inclusion
On 9/25/2012 1:27 PM, Edward C. Jones wrote:
I use up-to-date Debian testing (wheezy), amd64 architecture.
When I do a Google search, I sometimes get a window asking if I want to
do a search at monstermarketplace.com. For Windows, there is a piece of
malware with this name. Does this
On 9/28/2012 1:52 AM, Neal Murphy wrote:
On Friday, September 28, 2012 02:35:49 AM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
The only permanent solution to this confusion is for Debian to rename
the IA64 port to Itanium and rename the AMD64 port to something like
AMDINTL64.
Something wrong with 'x86_64
On 9/28/2012 6:30 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
AMDINTL64 seems to long for me.
Compared to kfreebsd-amd64 or kfreebsd-i386 it's not long at all.
Besides, the length is pretty much irrelevant. What matters is that
people know exactly what it is by name alone.
I think x86-64 would make some
On 9/28/2012 7:54 AM, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:35:49AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Maybe we could start some kind of petition for Itanium and
AMDINTL64. I think these tell everyone at a glance what they need to
know when selecting a port, and would completely eliminate
On 9/29/2012 4:51 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 01:47:55 -0500
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Hello Stan,
name I suggest above allows even the most challenged users to
understand.
I disagree. the use of the letters INTL are already established,
admittedly
On 9/27/2012 10:07 AM, Jochen Spieker wrote:
Tony Baldwin:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:33:45AM +0200, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote:
I also had to find the answer for 'IA64 or AMD64?'. AFAIR I used
google and then I grepped /proc/cpuinfo for 'lm'.
Isn't this just a question of whether you have
On 9/26/2012 11:14 AM, Artifex Maximus wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Selim T. Erdogan
se...@alumni.cs.utexas.edu wrote:
Artifex Maximus, 18.09.2012:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:29 PM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Artifex Maximus artife...@gmail.com writes:
I've changed my
On 9/25/2012 1:33 PM, Marek Pawinski wrote:
Hi,
I have noticed recently when my DSL router is on and connected and i
power on my machine, it's gets to the part (after i hit enter on my
kernel of choice) where a message appears loading please wait
and this goes on for a few minutes.
On 9/23/2012 8:14 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Freitag, 21. September 2012 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
That's how it's supposed to work, but rarely does. Most people these
days go straight for the mailing list hoping to save themselves the
time/effort of doing research. This is what the OP
On 9/23/2012 9:20 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
Stan, I feel your question is sincere and I will answer it sincerely.
Below is your original post, quoted in its entirety:
I'm going to snip a lot and try to respond to specific points as we've
taken up so much list space with this tread already.
On 9/22/2012 7:14 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:53:21 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 9/21/2012 10:06 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Stan, just my personal opinion but I think there's no need (and no
gain) to say this on the list. We all can think whatever we want -and
we can be wrong
On 9/23/2012 3:20 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
While one could hope you're wanting this off the list because you've
finally realized how much you've embarrassed yourself, I know that,
sadly, that isn't true.
The only thing in this thread that has embarrassed me is the hypocrisy
of those,
On 9/22/2012 2:38 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
Stan violates these two points of the CoC:
* The mailing lists exist to foster the development and use of Debian.
Non-constructive or off-topic messages, along with other abuses, are
not welcome.
* Try not to flame; it is not polite.
I
201 - 300 of 1488 matches
Mail list logo
