On 8/2/2011 6:56 PM, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
On 08/02/2011 04:50 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/1/2011 9:44 PM, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
I was a long-time user of make-kpkg, but since I learned how to use the
in-kernel deb-pkg target I have been taking the Debian Kernel Team's
advice and
Dne 3.8.2011 2:30, piše Dave Witbrodt:
On 08/02/2011 07:45 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 22:44:46 -0400 (EDT), Dave Witbrodt wrote:
My understanding is that the Debian Kernel Team recommends using the
'make deb-pkg' target now; they argued that kernel-package should be
On 8/1/2011 9:44 PM, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
I was a long-time user of make-kpkg, but since I learned how to use the
in-kernel deb-pkg target I have been taking the Debian Kernel Team's
advice and recommending building custom kernels that way.
As was I. One downside (depending on how you look
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 22:44:46 -0400 (EDT), Dave Witbrodt wrote:
My understanding is that the Debian Kernel Team recommends using the
'make deb-pkg' target now; they argued that kernel-package should be
considered deprecated, but Manoj wanted to continue supporting it since
so many people
On 08/02/2011 04:50 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/1/2011 9:44 PM, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
I was a long-time user of make-kpkg, but since I learned how to use the
in-kernel deb-pkg target I have been taking the Debian Kernel Team's
advice and recommending building custom kernels that way.
As was
On 08/02/2011 07:45 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 22:44:46 -0400 (EDT), Dave Witbrodt wrote:
My understanding is that the Debian Kernel Team recommends using the
'make deb-pkg' target now; they argued that kernel-package should be
considered deprecated, but Manoj wanted to
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:30:01 -0400 (EDT), Dave Witbrodt wrote:
Stephen Powell wrote:
I don't like make deb-pkg that well for a number of reasons. One of
them is that I get a linux-headers-* package and a libc-dev package too,
whether I want them or not. make-kpkg is more flexible. I only
hi,
anybody had the same issue? whole compilation goes fine,
but when it comes to creating packages it terminates with
following error:
/usr/bin/makeARCH=i386 \
-C Documentation/lguest
make: *** Documentation/lguest: No such file or directory. Stop.
make: ***
* tadziu [110801 18:58 +0200]:
hi,
anybody had the same issue? whole compilation goes fine,
but when it comes to creating packages it terminates with
following error:
/usr/bin/makeARCH=i386 \
-C Documentation/lguest
make: *** Documentation/lguest: No such file or
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:58:10 -0400 (EDT), tadziu wrote:
anybody had the same issue? whole compilation goes fine,
but when it comes to creating packages it terminates with
following error:
/usr/bin/makeARCH=i386 \
-C Documentation/lguest
make: ***
On 08/01/2011 08:21 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
I haven't tried this out myself yet, but this may be another symptom
of Debian bug report 635536.
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635563).
At the very least, the above bug report illustrates that there
are known problems with
:
I was trying to compile kernel src from backports with alsa modules
and ipw3945 modules. src was tar-.gz files fo this modules.
I get error like this
/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/include/adriver.h: In function
'snd_pci_orig_save_state':
/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/include/adriver.h:1099
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 02:54:55 -0400 (CDT)
Orestes Leal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe this modules doesn't work 'yet' with that kernel,
one Question, How do you build your kernel?
it´s suggested by linux that the sources of the kernel
must not be placed in /usr/src
for example my kernel
I was trying to compile kernel src from backports with alsa modules
and ipw3945 modules. src was tar-.gz files fo this modules.
I get error like this
/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/include/adriver.h: In function
'snd_pci_orig_save_state':
/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/include/adriver.h:1099: error
On Thursday 12 January 2006 03:14, Brian Nelson wrote:
Eike Lantzsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I attempted to compile kernel-2.6.15 with make-kpkg but I got this error:
[snip]
http://bugs.debian.org/347487
Thank you, the workaround worked (downgrade kernel-package 10.031 to 10.030
I attempted to compile kernel-2.6.15 with make-kpkg but I got this error:
gzip
-9qf
/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.15/debian/linux-image-2.6.15.20060111/usr/share/doc/linux-image-2.6.15.20060111/conf.vars
install -p -m 644
debian/buildinfo
/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.15/debian/linux-image
Eike Lantzsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I attempted to compile kernel-2.6.15 with make-kpkg but I got this error:
gzip
-9qf
/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.15/debian/linux-image-2.6.15.20060111/usr/share/doc/linux-image-2.6.15.20060111/conf.vars
install -p -m 644
debian/buildinfo
Hi list, Please reply to email directly. Thanks.
problem: server reboots after kernel is uncompressed.
no error as the kernel never loaded and puked before run-time.
hardware: dell poweredge 2450.
bf24.bin loads fine for the 2.4.18.
all hardware in dmesg compiled into custom kernel 2.6.3.
On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 21:48:06 -0800
Corey Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running 2.6.0-test9-mm1 on a KT400, and I haven't noticed any
particular strain during heavy I/O. At the moment, my system is under
light load and yet can still give hdparm -t 30-45 MB/sec (which is to
be expected)
apt, of course), and tried to compile the kernel with these options:
M Adaptec AIC7xxx Fast - U160 support (New Driver)
? ?(32) Maximum number of TCQ commands per device
? ?(15000) Initial bus reset delay in milli-seconds
? ?[*] Probe for EISA and VL AIC7XXX Adapters
? ?[*] Build Adapter Firmware
decided to give the 2.6.0-test series a try, so I downloaded the source
(via apt, of course), and tried to compile the kernel with these
options:
I don't have any SCSI HDD, but maybe your SCSI driver isn't ready yet in
2.6?. In post-halloween-2.6.txt
(http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/docs/post
Karol Czachorowski wrote:
By the way, anyone using 2.6.0-testX on VIA686[AB] chipset? I have some
troubles with IDE preformance.
Karol
I'm running 2.6.0-test9-mm1 on a KT400, and I haven't noticed any
particular strain during heavy I/O. At the moment, my system is under
light load and yet can
Patrick Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 at 1:42am, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
: --- dhobner [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
: I did the following:
:
: apt-get install gcc
: apt-get install kernel-package
: apt-get install kernel-source.2.4.18
: apt-get install libc6-dev
:
Gary Hennigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think, in general, it's best to stick with 2.95 compilers for the
kernel. There are exceptions, but the easiest route is to use gcc-2.95
for compiling kernel source. You can do this by editing the
kernel-source-2.4.20/Makefile and setting
Gary Hennigan wrote:
I think, in general, it's best to stick with 2.95 compilers for the
kernel.
This seems to be the common view of the kernel developers, but I've had
no trouble building 2.4.20 and .21 kernels using whatever gcc was
current in Debian unstable at the time (3.3 currently, and
I use the deb-packages. On Unstable: kernel-package (8.040), gcc(3.3-2),
kernel-source-2.4.20 (2.4.20-8). I also had problems before, which could
be solved by changing the Makefile back to gcc-2.95 (eg. it compiled),
but now, with the packages above, everything seems to be just fine.
Best
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:49:44 -0700
Craig Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary Hennigan wrote:
I think, in general, it's best to stick with 2.95 compilers for the
kernel.
This seems to be the common view of the kernel developers, but I've had
no trouble building 2.4.20 and .21 kernels
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 at 9:25am, Gary Hennigan wrote:
:Patrick Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 at 1:42am, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
[...]
: : Anyone know why this is not compiling?
:
: No, but I grabbed the 2.4.20 source and had all sorts of other problems.
: I'm on a
what version of kernel-source are you using? I have 2.4.20-7 (from
testing) and cannot compile with gcc3.3.
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 13:11, Kevin McKinley wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:49:44 -0700
Craig Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary Hennigan wrote:
I think, in general, it's
On 17 Jun 2003 14:52:41 -0700
Jeremy Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what version of kernel-source are you using? I have 2.4.20-7 (from
testing) and cannot compile with gcc3.3.
I haven't actually, but I was speaking of 2.4.20-8, which others have used
successfully with gcc3.3.
Here's an
I did the following:
apt-get install gcc
apt-get install kernel-package
apt-get install kernel-source.2.4.18
apt-get install libc6-dev
apt-get install tk8.3
apt-get install libncurses5-dev
tar -jxf kernel-source-2.4.18.tar.bz2
make-kpkg clean
make-kpkg --append-to-version=.030320 kernel_image
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:30:53AM -0400, dhobner wrote:
I did the following:
apt-get install gcc
apt-get install kernel-package
apt-get install kernel-source.2.4.18
apt-get install libc6-dev
apt-get install tk8.3
apt-get install libncurses5-dev
tar -jxf kernel-source-2.4.18.tar.bz2
--- dhobner [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
I did the following:
apt-get install gcc
apt-get install kernel-package
apt-get install kernel-source.2.4.18
apt-get install libc6-dev
apt-get install tk8.3
apt-get install libncurses5-dev
tar -jxf kernel-source-2.4.18.tar.bz2
make-kpkg
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 at 1:42am, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
: --- dhobner [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
: I did the following:
:
: apt-get install gcc
: apt-get install kernel-package
: apt-get install kernel-source.2.4.18
: apt-get install libc6-dev
: apt-get install tk8.3
: apt-get install
Its the latest 2.5.45 Appologies for not mentioning this.
The below error seems to indicate a broken makefile, doesn't it?
Justin Ryan wrote:
Any ideas about the below error? It is from the kernel.org download
2.5.44? if not, recommend you grab the latest..
make menuconfig
make -f
Any ideas about the below error? It is from the kernel.org download
make menuconfig
make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts lxdialog
scripts/Makefile.build:10: .config: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `.config'. Stop.
make: *** [menuconfig] Error 2
--
Any ideas about the below error? It is from the kernel.org download
2.5.44? if not, recommend you grab the latest..
make menuconfig
make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts lxdialog
scripts/Makefile.build:10: .config: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target
well, thats about it...is it known not to?
dragos
PS sistem woody, kernel 2.4.14
On 29-Nov-2001 Dragos wrote:
well, thats about it...is it known not to?
dragos
PS sistem woody, kernel 2.4.14
a large reason why we still have gcc 2.9.5 as the default compiler ...
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:42:04PM +0200, Dragos Delcea (Bucaresti, Ro) wrote:
| well, thats about it...is it known not to?
Likely. Since gcc 3 is so new, it is also likely that there are bugs
in it. The kernel tends to trigger some rare bugs in the compiler,
which is why I beleive they only
On 29-Nov-2001 dman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:42:04PM +0200, Dragos Delcea (Bucaresti, Ro)
wrote:
| well, thats about it...is it known not to?
Likely. Since gcc 3 is so new, it is also likely that there are bugs
in it. The kernel tends to trigger some rare bugs in the compiler,
On Thursday 29 November 2001 06:53 pm, dman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:42:04PM +0200, Dragos Delcea (Bucaresti, Ro)
wrote:
| well, thats about it...is it known not to?
Likely. Since gcc 3 is so new, it is also likely that there are bugs
in it. The kernel tends to trigger some rare
well, I'll try again tomorow; for now I installed 2.95 and got over it...
I'll let you all know what I find out (I think it is gcc for it gave me an
error screen which told me to submit a bug report to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
however, can I trust it to compile anything else except the kernel?
Kernel 2.4.16 has appeared, to fix the bug in the preceding version.
Unfortunately the new version won't compile here: I get:
In function `parport_config'
Undefined reference to `parport_pc_probe_port'
Anthony Campbell
--
Anthony Campbell - running Linux GNU/Debian
On 27 Nov 2001, Anthony Campbell wrote:
Kernel 2.4.16 has appeared, to fix the bug in the preceding version.
Unfortunately the new version won't compile here: I get:
In function `parport_config'
Undefined reference to `parport_pc_probe_port'
Anthony Campbell
Thanks to
On 27 Nov 2001, David Goodenough wrote:
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 5:14 pm, Anthony Campbell wrote:
On 27 Nov 2001, Anthony Campbell wrote:
Kernel 2.4.16 has appeared, to fix the bug in the preceding version.
Unfortunately the new version won't compile here: I get:
In function
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 10:05:00PM +, Matthew Sackman wrote:
Dear all (again)!
I'm using a 2.4.0 test 5 kernel, which is working fine,
I've build and installed kernel headers, and set up
/usr/src/linux to point to the headers.
Hi Matthew (again)
I think a newer kernel could be the
Dear all (again)!
I'm using a 2.4.0 test 5 kernel, which is working fine,
I've build and installed kernel headers, and set up
/usr/src/linux to point to the headers.
I'm trying to compile the NVidia kernel module so that I
can make use of /dev/agpart and dri infrastructure, and the
advanced
:
Dear all (again)!
I'm using a 2.4.0 test 5 kernel, which is working fine,
I've build and installed kernel headers, and set up
/usr/src/linux to point to the headers.
I'm trying to compile the NVidia kernel module so that I
can make use of /dev/agpart and dri infrastructure
Linus is on vacation :(
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/mnt/hda1/src/linux-2.2.4/linux-2.2.4-vanilla/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-strength-reduce -m486
-malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2 -DCPU=586 -DMODULE
-DMODVERSIONS -include
On 3 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
in make menuconfig, turn off anythig you do not need
immediately, like any unknown drivers. (look at makefiles and .config
to know what to turn off).
I too have a hinote vp 575 laptop and a Xircom ehternet/modem
card, but I have not yet
On 3 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Mark The links I created were:
SNIP
I compile kernels in /usr/local all the time, and I never have
created any of these links ... they are not required.
I made the links because that's what the README file for the linux
kernel says to do. As
Hi,
I think it is time for my canned posting about how kernel
header files are handled by Debian.
manoj
$Id: README.headers,v 1.7 1998/07/14 21:18:38 srivasta Exp $
This is the Debian GNU/Linux prepackaged version of the Linux kernel
headers. Linux was written by Linus
Hi,
I need to compile the 2.0.31 kernel. Unfortunately there is
not a debian package for the 2.0.31 kernel, so I downloaded the upstream
version, unpacked it into /usr/local/src, created links and followed the
instructions for make-kpkg in order to make a kernel image package.
Unfortunately
Hi,
Mark == Mark Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mark I need to compile the 2.0.31 kernel. Unfortunately there is
Mark not a debian package for the 2.0.31 kernel, so I downloaded the
Mark upstream version, unpacked it into /usr/local/src, created
Mark links
What links did you
On 3 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Mark I need to compile the 2.0.31 kernel. Unfortunately there is
Mark not a debian package for the 2.0.31 kernel, so I downloaded the
Mark upstream version, unpacked it into /usr/local/src, created
Mark links
What links did you create
On 3 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Mark == Mark Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mark /usr/include/sys/types.h:45: conflicting types for `mode_t'
Mark /usr/local/src/linux-2.0.31/include/linux/types.h:12: previous
declaration
Mark of `mode_t'
Something is seriously wrong
Hi,
Mark == Mark Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mark On 3 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Mark I need to compile the 2.0.31 kernel. Unfortunately there is
Mark not a debian package for the 2.0.31 kernel, so I downloaded the
Mark upstream version, unpacked it into /usr/local/src
On 3 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Mark I am at a loss to know what to try next.
Me too. I can only tell you what works for me, which is: I
unpack kernel sources in /usr/local/src/kernel; I ignore the bit
about symlinks, and I use make-kpkg; but it has been a while since I
Hi,
in make menuconfig, turn off anythig you do not need
immediately, like any unknown drivers. (look at makefiles and .config
to know what to turn off).
I too have a hinote vp 575 laptop and a Xircom ehternet/modem
card, but I have not yet loaded Linux on the laptop -- I'sd
I am running Debian 1.3 and so far have had no problems so far recompiling
kernel 2.0.30 whenever I have needed. Today I d/l'd 2.0.33 and get the
following errors:
-2.0.33/lib/lib.a /usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.33/arch/i386/lib/lib.a -o
vmlinux
fs/filesystems.a(fat.o): In function `fat_readdirx':
Chris,
You need to enable the NLS support. Seems that if you enable the FAT
file system (among other things) you need to compile the NLS support in
also. Take a look at the Configure.help file in the
/usr/src/linux/Documentation directory. Search on NLS and you'll find
out the info.
Steve
62 matches
Mail list logo
