Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-17 Thread Henning Follmann
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:08:47PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote: - Original Message - From: Marty mar...@ix.netcom.com It seems like free software employment and market share come with increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's my main concern as a Debian user, as I

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-17 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 17/10/14 23:06, Henning Follmann wrote: On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:08:47PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote: - Original Message - From: Marty mar...@ix.netcom.com It seems like free software employment and market share come with increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-17 Thread Ric Moore
On 10/16/2014 11:30 PM, Marty wrote: On 10/16/2014 08:41 PM, Ric Moore wrote: But, I consider it idiotic to bash Red Hat as ~anyone~ with the guts can do what Bob Young did. Just gather some talented people together around a kitchen table and create your own distro. That is perfectly legal

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-17 Thread Steve Litt
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 08:06:11 -0400 Henning Follmann hfollm...@itcfollmann.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:08:47PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote: - Original Message - From: Marty mar...@ix.netcom.com It seems like free software employment and market share come with

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-16 Thread Rob Owens
- Original Message - From: Marty mar...@ix.netcom.com It seems like free software employment and market share come with increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's my main concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends. I hope that Debian members consider an

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-16 Thread Miles Fidelman
Rob Owens wrote: - Original Message - From: Marty mar...@ix.netcom.com It seems like free software employment and market share come with increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's my main concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends. I hope that Debian members

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-16 Thread Brian
On Thu 16 Oct 2014 at 14:08:47 -0400, Rob Owens wrote: From: Marty mar...@ix.netcom.com It seems like free software employment and market share come with increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's my main concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends. I

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-16 Thread Ric Moore
On 10/15/2014 08:02 PM, Marty wrote: On 10/15/2014 04:19 PM, Ric Moore wrote: This is fortuitous! Not a bad gig at all. I'm sure some soreheads think that we debated WORLD DOMINATION during lunch, or how to screw over Debian, but sadly we mostly discussed what was the Right Thingtm Do

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-16 Thread Marty
On 10/16/2014 08:41 PM, Ric Moore wrote: But, I consider it idiotic to bash Red Hat as ~anyone~ with the guts can do what Bob Young did. Just gather some talented people together around a kitchen table and create your own distro. That is perfectly legal and now they are worth billions, by

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise, surprise. Damned for their success. We want Linux to be successful, but woe betide any company that actually gets us there... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread berenger . morel
Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise, surprise. Damned for their success. We want Linux to be successful, but woe betide any company that actually gets

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 15 oct 14, 10:41:12, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Maybe you want. But I think that most users just want it to work fine and efficiently, which does not necessarily imply being sold massively around the world. The fact is, that linux is actually a success, but it has never

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Brian
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise, surprise. Damned for their success. We

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread berenger . morel
Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit : On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise,

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit : On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: Check out

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Mike McGinn
Comments inline below: On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 06:37:57 Scott Ferguson wrote: On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit : On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread berenger . morel
Le 15.10.2014 12:37, Scott Ferguson a écrit : On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit : On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread John Hasler
Steve Litt writes: Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise, surprise. Better Red Hat than just about anybody else. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Joel Rees
2014/10/15 1:47 Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk: On Tue 14 Oct 2014 at 12:06:11 -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:02:10AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:05:06 -0400 Henning Follmann hfollm...@itcfollmann.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:09:53 +0100 Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk napísal: On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: Check out what single

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Steve Litt
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:11:10 +0100 Jonathan Dowland j...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise, surprise. Damned for their success. We want Linux to be successful, but woe betide

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Steve Litt
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:37:37 +0900 Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote: 2014/10/15 1:47 Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk: Give me swearing in posts rather than innuendo and attempted character assassination of a group dedicated workers. Do you realize that a lot of your posts, jumping on

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Brian
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 12:53:52 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:37:37 +0900 Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote: 2014/10/15 1:47 Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk: Give me swearing in posts rather than innuendo and attempted character assassination of a group dedicated

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Keith Peter
On 14 October 2014 17:10, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, Marty wrote: It seems like free software employment and market share come with increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. People have to eat. Almost everyone who works on Debian has someone who

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Ric Moore
On 10/15/2014 07:08 AM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit : On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: Check out

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Ric Moore
On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote: We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what I mean). Wonderful Linux company Corel changed their CEO, and promptly accepted money from Microsoft and dropped all their

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Joel Rees
2014/10/16 5:46 Ric Moore wayward4...@gmail.com: On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote: We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what I mean). Wonderful Linux company Corel changed their CEO, and promptly

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 15 oct 14, 21:37:57, Scott Ferguson wrote: As far as I'm aware Debian has *never* been sold anywhere, nor are there plans to - did I miss another meeting down the docks? http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/ No, that's not meant as a joke. As far as I understand, this is about the only

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Wednesday 15 October 2014 22:44:18 Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Mi, 15 oct 14, 21:37:57, Scott Ferguson wrote: As far as I'm aware Debian has *never* been sold anywhere, nor are there plans to - did I miss another meeting down the docks? http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/ No, that's not

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Ric Moore
On 10/15/2014 05:06 PM, Joel Rees wrote: 2014/10/16 5:46 Ric Moore wayward4...@gmail.com mailto:wayward4...@gmail.com: On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote: We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what I

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Marty
On 10/15/2014 04:19 PM, Ric Moore wrote: On 10/15/2014 07:08 AM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit : On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 16/10/14 00:14, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 12:37, Scott Ferguson a écrit : On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit : On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Steve Litt
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:06:00 +0900 Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote: 2014/10/16 5:46 Ric Moore wayward4...@gmail.com: On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote: We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Henning Follmann
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:56:40AM -0400, Marty wrote: It seems like free software employment and market share come with increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's my main concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends. I hope that Debian members consider an amendment

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread David Guyot
Marty, I think I see why you suggest this: as a corporate user of Debian, I think you would like to see Debian orientations more enterprise-friendly, for example by loosening external software license policy or upgrade frequency. Being myself such a user, I understand that the stability and

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Steve Litt
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:05:06 -0400 Henning Follmann hfollm...@itcfollmann.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:56:40AM -0400, Marty wrote: It seems like free software employment and market share come with increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's my main concern as a

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Rusi Mody
On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 5:50:02 PM UTC+5:30, Henning Follmann wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:56:40AM -0400, Marty wrote: It seems like free software employment and market share come with increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's my main concern as a Debian user, as

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Henning Follmann
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:02:10AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:05:06 -0400 Henning Follmann hfollm...@itcfollmann.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:56:40AM -0400, Marty wrote: It seems like free software employment and market share come with increasing risk to

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 15/10/14 02:02, Steve Litt wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:05:06 -0400 Henning Follmann hfollm...@itcfollmann.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:56:40AM -0400, Marty wrote: It seems like free software employment and market share come with increasing risk to objectivity and technical

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, Marty wrote: It seems like free software employment and market share come with increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. People have to eat. Almost everyone who works on Debian has someone who pays them. It's my main concern as a Debian user, as I consider

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Martin Read
On 14/10/14 16:05, Scott Ferguson wrote: And how should we interpret that in light of your signature and constant plugging of your business on the list? Perhaps Joey Hess's signature holds the answer? I presume you mean Joel Rees (yes, I get their names mixed up occasionally too), since Joey

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Brian
On Tue 14 Oct 2014 at 12:06:11 -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:02:10AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:05:06 -0400 Henning Follmann hfollm...@itcfollmann.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:56:40AM -0400, Marty wrote: It seems like free

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Marty
On 10/14/2014 12:10 PM, Don Armstrong wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, Marty wrote: It seems like free software employment and market share come with increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. People have to eat. Almost everyone who works on Debian has someone who pays them. It's my

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Marty
On 10/14/2014 12:47 PM, Brian wrote: On Tue 14 Oct 2014 at 12:06:11 -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:02:10AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:05:06 -0400 Henning Follmann hfollm...@itcfollmann.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:56:40AM -0400,

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Steve Litt
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 20:35:54 -0400 Marty mar...@ix.netcom.com wrote: http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/whos-writing-linux Say hello to our new bosses? Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise, surprise. SteveT Steve Litt*