achei que fosse algum problema no Squid, tanto que limpei
o cache parei e subi novamente o Squid, mas nada resolveu.
Descobri (sei lá, pelo menos aparentemente) que se eu parar a conexão
ADSL: poff dsl-provider e depois subir novamente com pon
dsl-provider tudo volta ao normal.
Alguém sabe se insto
cache parei e subi novamente o Squid, mas nada resolveu.
Descobri (sei lá, pelo menos aparentemente) que se eu parar a conexão
ADSL: poff dsl-provider e depois subir novamente com pon
dsl-provider tudo volta ao normal.
Alguém sabe se insto procede?...Se for, é algum bug no pacote?...Tem
como
aparentemente) que se eu parar a
conexão ADSL: poff dsl-provider e depois subir novamente com
pon dsl-provider tudo volta ao normal.
Alguém sabe se insto procede?...Se for, é algum bug no
pacote?...Tem como arrumar isto?
Grato,
Jurgen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
debian
(sei lá, pelo menos aparentemente) que se eu parar a
conexão ADSL: poff dsl-provider e depois subir novamente com
pon dsl-provider tudo volta ao normal.
Alguém sabe se insto procede?...Se for, é algum bug no
pacote?...Tem como arrumar isto?
Grato,
Jurgen
depois subir novamente com pon dsl-
provider tudo volta ao normal.Alguém sabe se insto procede?...Se for, é
algum bug no pacote?...Tem como arrumar isto?
Grato,Jurgen
debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org[4]
listmas...@lists.debian.org[5]
http://lists.debian.org/52c55b06.2080...@gmail.com[6
Buenas tardes,
-Mensaje original-
De: Camaleón [mailto:noela...@gmail.com]
Enviado el: viernes, 19 de noviembre de 2010 10:00
Para: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Asunto: Re: Mandar un correo a 2 direcciones poniendo solo 1 dirección.
El Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:47:22 +0100, Ramses
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 08:09:49PM -0400, A. F. Cano wrote:
...
And following up to my remaining problem, it is now solved.
ip-up.local was executing the command that popped up the pppstatus
window too quickly. The ppp link was not completely up yet and so
pppstatus couldn't see it. A sleep 1
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 06:28:44AM +0200, NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:34:33PM -0400, A. F. Cano wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 02:06:14PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
$ /usr/bin/X11/xhost +
Yes, I had done that.
Then as root in a terminal:
# export DISPLAY=:0.0
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 02:06:14PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, A. F. Cano shared this with us all:
--} I've also tried without su. The result is the same:
--}
--} konsole: cannot connect to X server
--}
--} And this is even after I've typed
--}
--} xhost +
--}
--} from a
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:34:33PM -0400, A. F. Cano wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 02:06:14PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
$ /usr/bin/X11/xhost +
Yes, I had done that.
Then as root in a terminal:
# export DISPLAY=:0.0 your user name here
This was the missing piece! I was missing the user name.
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, NN_il_Confusionario shared this with us all:
--} /usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/FAQ.gz
--} section How do I run an X client as root when the X session is run by a
user? --}
--} (this is the placement in sarge, I have not checked where the FAQ is
now)
I don't know where that
I've decided to automate what I've been doing manually after starting
pppd, via pon.
/usr/bin/pon (a script) starts /usr/sbin/pppd (an suid root executable).
I used to start pon as root, but I've added myself to the dip group
so I now can start it as a regular user. After the link is up,
/etc
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, A. F. Cano shared this with us all:
--} I've also tried without su. The result is the same:
--}
--} konsole: cannot connect to X server
--}
--} And this is even after I've typed
--}
--} xhost +
--}
--} from a regular user console.
You may need to do the following:
As user in
John Hasler wrote:
I would like to have some graphical way that could start ppp via an
applet...
Gpppon.
...and then display status (graph of incoming/outgoing data and
statistics either on the status bar or a small window).
Pppstatus in an Xterm.
Yes, I'm aware of pppstatus and
Hi,
I have ppp configured just fine with pon/poff so I would like to keep
using that sub-system as all the configuration files are working.
I would like to have some graphical way that could start ppp
via an applet and then display status (graph of incoming/outgoing data
and statistics either
I would like to have some graphical way that could start ppp via an
applet...
Gpppon.
...and then display status (graph of incoming/outgoing data and
statistics either on the status bar or a small window).
Pppstatus in an Xterm.
Yes, I'm aware of pppstatus and pppstats; I don't want a
-, and ppp-HOWTOs
Searched the debian mailing lists to no effect.
I finally stumbled across it and thought that
others may be having the same problem so thought I'd post my log here so
it goes to the archives.
The problem I was having was that
pon courier
would show in
plog
Matthias Maisenbacher schrieb:
Hallo zusammen,
das Einrichten der DSL-Verbindung war einfach:
pppoeconf aufrufen, alle Werte eintragen. Fertig.
verbinden: pon dsl-provider
trennen:poff
Nur - nach einem Reboot ist es wieder weg. Wenn ich dann pon aufrufe,
meldet der Rechner im
Nur - nach einem Reboot ist es wieder weg. Wenn ich dann pon aufrufe,
Das scheint das gleiche Problem wie in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-german/2005/07/msg02531.html zu
Danke allen Antwortern.
Ich hab die eth0 nun in die /etc/network/interfaces eingetragen.
Seither wird eth0 beim
Hallo zusammen,
das Einrichten der DSL-Verbindung war einfach:
pppoeconf aufrufen, alle Werte eintragen. Fertig.
verbinden: pon dsl-provider
trennen:poff
Nur - nach einem Reboot ist es wieder weg. Wenn ich dann pon aufrufe,
meldet der Rechner im syslog:
Jul 24 22:41:01 obelix
Nachtrag:
beim ersten Einwählen steht matthias, beim zweiten mamaisen,
das hat nichts zu sagen. Ich habs danach mit matthias nochmal
probiert und es sieht genau so aus.
Ebenso hab ich es vor dem pppoeconf mit beiden usern probiert. Nix ging.
Matthias
Jul 24 22:41:01 obelix pppd[1795]:
Hallo!
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 10:57:57PM +0200, Matthias Maisenbacher wrote:
das Einrichten der DSL-Verbindung war einfach:
[snip]
Nur - nach einem Reboot ist es wieder weg. Wenn ich dann pon aufrufe,
meldet der Rechner im syslog:
Jul 24 22:41:01 obelix pppd[1795]: Plugin rp
Kent West wrote:
Debian User Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
n Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:47:39PM -0500, Debian User Leonard
Chatagnier wrote:
Many changes were made in the configuration files to no avail. The
current configuration files and errer messages are below: (Note: I
have pon
Debian User Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
Kent West wrote:
Debian User Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
snip re: wvdial not working, whereas other dialers do work
What are the permissions on /etc/wvdial.conf?
ChatagnierL-Home:/etc/ppp/peers# ls -l /etc/wvdial.conf
-rwxrwxrwt 1 root root 212 Jun
Debian User Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
Kent West wrote:
What are the permissions on /etc/wvdial.conf?
ChatagnierL-Home:/etc/ppp/peers# ls -l /etc/wvdial.conf
-rwxrwxrwt 1 root root 212 Jun 26 11:04 /etc/wvdial.conf
The more I think about it, the less I think these permissions are
correct.
Kent West wrote:
I believe I'd purge and then reinstall wvdial, and maybe.
Don't you just love sentence fragments? They're so very.
Seriously, ignore the partial. I was going to say I might would also
purge/reinstall the ppp-related stuff, but then I remembered that wvdial
is more-or-less
I'm having some of the same issues that Leonard has. The wvdial
doesn't appear to work on 2.6 kernels. I've scripted the tests as high as
kernel 2.6.12. It seems that the connection is immediately lost with only
0.0 or 0.1 minutes connection time reported.
I am going to use
Kent West wrote:
Kent West wrote:
I believe I'd purge and then reinstall wvdial, and maybe.
Don't you just love sentence fragments? They're so very.
Seriously, ignore the partial. I was going to say I might would also
purge/reinstall the ppp-related stuff, but then I remembered
Debian User Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
I still get the warning about can't write PAP-secrets and
Chap-secrets-Permission denied, when calling wvdial as user.
What is the Debian preferred way to do this?
Is your user a member of the dip and dialout groups? If not, then:
adduser lchata dip
Debian User Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
Kent West wrote:
Debian User Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
I still get the warning about can't write PAP-secrets and
Chap-secrets-Permission denied, when calling wvdial as user.
What is the Debian preferred way to do this?
Is your user a member of the
Gayle Lee Fairless wrote:
I'm having some of the same issues that Leonard has. The wvdial
doesn't appear to work on 2.6 kernels. I've scripted the tests as high as
kernel 2.6.12. It seems that the connection is immediately lost with only
0.0 or 0.1 minutes connection time reported.
I
Kent West wrote:
Debian User Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
I still get the warning about can't write PAP-secrets and
Chap-secrets-Permission denied, when calling wvdial as user.
What is the Debian preferred way to do this?
Is your user a member of the dip and dialout groups?
Kent West wrote:
Debian User Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
Kent West wrote:
Debian User Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
I still get the warning about can't write PAP-secrets and
Chap-secrets-Permission denied, when calling wvdial as user.
What is the Debian preferred way
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:47:39PM -0500, Debian User Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
Many changes were made in the configuration files to no avail. The
current configuration files and errer messages
are below: (Note: I have pon working on sarge now but can't remember how
I got it now.)
Thanks
n Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:47:39PM -0500, Debian User Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
Many changes were made in the configuration files to no avail. The
current configuration files and errer messages
are below: (Note: I have pon working on sarge now but can't remember how
I got it now.)
Thanks
Debian User Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
n Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:47:39PM -0500, Debian User Leonard
Chatagnier wrote:
Many changes were made in the configuration files to no avail. The
current configuration files and errer messages are below: (Note: I
have pon working on sarge now
This issue was priviously posted as Wvdial, Pon Broke On Sarge-Stable,
Only Pon works On Woody-Done Everthing I Know-Need Help, but no
solution forthcoming. Since then, have tried to configure KPPP and it
wont work. Reposting with new info. Need serious Guru help. OOOPS,
Fixed KPPP myself
Discovered wvdial and pon not working after finally getting the
2.4.27-2-386 KI to boot. Ran wvdialconf and
pppconfig which didn't change anything. Chmod a+rwx on all wvdial and
wvdial.conf files. Some Debians may
say that's not the way, but I don't want to use su and don't have to on
pon
Debian User Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
Discovered wvdial and pon not working after finally getting the
2.4.27-2-386 KI to boot. Ran wvdialconf and
pppconfig which didn't change anything. Chmod a+rwx on all wvdial and
wvdial.conf files. Some Debians may
say that's not the way, but I don't want
---BeginMessage---
Marty wrote:
Debian User Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
Discovered wvdial and pon not working after finally getting the
2.4.27-2-386 KI to boot. Ran wvdialconf and
pppconfig which didn't change anything. Chmod a+rwx on all wvdial
and wvdial.conf files. Some Debians may
say
wvdial still gave same
error message as user or as root. Now
what? Thanks for helping,
Leonard
I'm at a loss. Sorry, but as I wrote privately pon is its own dialer
and there are many other dialers in Debian. You might use them to
verify it's wvdial-specific, then file a seperate bug report
and rebooted and runing wvdial still gave same
error message as user or as root. Now
what? Thanks for helping,
Leonard
I'm at a loss. Sorry, but as I wrote privately pon is its own dialer
and there are many other dialers in Debian. You might use them to
verify it's wvdial-specific, then file
letztendlich der beste funktionierende
Workaround für den fehlenden ifconfig-up-Patch, allerdings musst man
jetzht statt pon ifup verwenden.
Gruss,
Eduard.
--
Ambassador Londo Mollari: Everyone around me dies, Mr. Morden, except those who
most deserve
iface eth1 inet static
address 0.0.0.0
netmask 255.255.255.0
noch rein und es geht wieder.
Nein, eth1 geht zum LAN. Das steht da auch schon richtig drin.
Trotzdem vielen Dank.
Lars
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
Am Montag, 13. Juni 2005 09:29 schrieb LJahn:
iface eth1 inet static
address 0.0.0.0
netmask 255.255.255.0
noch rein und es geht wieder.
Nein, eth1 geht zum LAN. Das steht da auch schon richtig drin.
Trotzdem vielen Dank.
Sorry, für eth0 wär es für mich wohl die
jetzht statt pon ifup verwenden.
weißt du zufällig, ob das auch problemlos mit der Zeile
D0:2345:respawn:/usr/sbin/pppd nodetach call dsl-provider
in der /etc/inittab funktioniert?
Müsste man nicht für jeden Provider (wenn man denn verschiedene hat) auch
in /etc/network/ was anlegen? Ich hab
Hallo,
habe seit einer Weile mal wieder apt-get dist-upgrade auf meinem dsl-router
gemacht. seit dem läuft die Internet-Verbindung nur nach manuellem ifconfig
eth0 up. Ich überlege diese Zeile einfach in /etc/network/interfaces
einzutragen. Allerdings steht da schon folgendes :
iface
Pessoal
Alguém pode me dar a dica de como evitar que o modem emita o som da
discagem? Sei que para kppp há uma opção, mas eu uso o pon/poff.
Já procurei nos arquivos em /etc/ppp e não achei.
Valeu!
Leandro
--
(@_ Leandro Padilha Ferreira - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//\
V_/_ http
Leandro Ferreira wrote:
Pessoal
Alguém pode me dar a dica de como evitar que o modem emita o som da
discagem? Sei que para kppp há uma opção, mas eu uso o pon/poff.
Já procurei nos arquivos em /etc/ppp e não achei.
Olá, procure no histórico da lista.
http://lists.debian.org
On 12.Sep 2004 - 21:09:13, Dirk Salva wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 07:20:10PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Der Scheiss hat hier an dem Tag schon genug genervt. Wir haben da zu
zweit einige Stunden dran gesessen (beide vorher noch nie ISDN unter
Linux eingerichtet).
Nicht fluchen, besser
On 11.Sep 2004 - 19:10:09, Elmar W. Tischhauser wrote:
Hallo!
On 11 Sep 2004 at 16:58 +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 11.Sep 2004 - 13:26:36, Dirk Salva wrote:
Irrtum, pap-secrects ist besser, weil chap AFAIK unsicher ist.
Woran machst du das fest? Auszug aus RFC 1334, Abschnitt 2:
On 11.Sep 2004 - 19:32:24, Dirk Salva wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 04:58:34PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Nicht ganz. Bei mir hat mit ipppd0 absolut gar nichts funktioniert.
Da waere dann Ursachenforschung dran gewesen. Ausserdem ist es ippp0
(ohne d) *klugscheiss* ;-) Also bei meinem
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 07:20:10PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Bei mir kam hinzu, dass ich
ISDN und DSL genutzt habe, und ipppd.ippp0 musste umbenannt werden,
weil sonst irgendwas nicht mehr funktionierte. Wie gesagt, mit dem
default-gw oder wasweissich, ist schon zu lange her, dass ich
Hallo!
On 12 Sep 2004 at 19:15 +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 11.Sep 2004 - 19:10:09, Elmar W. Tischhauser wrote:
On 11 Sep 2004 at 16:58 +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Irrtum, pap-secrects ist besser, weil chap AFAIK unsicher ist.
Woran machst du das fest? Auszug aus RFC 1334,
Hallo!
On 12 Sep 2004 at 21:09 +0200, Dirk Salva wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 07:20:10PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
haette dir gezeigt dass fuer ippp0 eine Defaultroute gesetzt wird -
einfach Auskommentieren und gut. Oder einen Check dort einbauen ob
eventuell DSL benutzt wird.
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 10:29:10PM +0200, Elmar W. Tischhauser wrote:
Zumindest bei meinem Woody gibt es in der /etc/isdn/device.ippp0 einen
ausführlichen Kommentar, der beschreibt, wo man bezüglich der Routen
etwas einstellen muss: Abschnitt NETWORK SETUP, Zeile 258ff.
Jupp. Und da stehts ja
On 10.Sep 2004 - 21:13:53, Frank Coldewe wrote:
hallo,
option `number`. Hat da wer eine Idee ?? capi habe ich nicht mehr drin,
läuft alles über isdn4linux wegen der Karte (fritz pcmcia)
Dann ist aber nicht der ppp zustaendig sondern der ipppd. Also mal in
/etc/isdn/device.ippp0 und
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 12:05:58PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
option `number`. Hat da wer eine Idee ?? capi habe ich nicht mehr drin,
läuft alles über isdn4linux wegen der Karte (fritz pcmcia)
Dann ist aber nicht der ppp zustaendig sondern der ipppd. Also mal in
/etc/isdn/device.ippp0
On 11.Sep 2004 - 13:26:36, Dirk Salva wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 12:05:58PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Nicht ganz. Bei mir hat mit ipppd0 absolut gar nichts funktioniert.
Da waere dann Ursachenforschung dran gewesen. Ausserdem ist es ippp0
(ohne d) *klugscheiss* ;-) Also bei meinem Woody
Hallo!
On 11 Sep 2004 at 16:58 +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 11.Sep 2004 - 13:26:36, Dirk Salva wrote:
Nicht ganz. Bei mir hat mit ipppd0 absolut gar nichts funktioniert.
Da waere dann Ursachenforschung dran gewesen. Ausserdem ist es ippp0
(ohne d) *klugscheiss* ;-) Also bei meinem
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 04:58:34PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Nicht ganz. Bei mir hat mit ipppd0 absolut gar nichts funktioniert.
Da waere dann Ursachenforschung dran gewesen. Ausserdem ist es ippp0
(ohne d) *klugscheiss* ;-) Also bei meinem Woody ging das ohne
Probleme, einfach in die
/true
#active-filter 'outbound and not icmp[0] == 3 and not tcp[13] 4 != 0'
usepeerdns
ipcp-accept-local
ipcp-accept-remote
and have also edit /etc/ppp/chap-secrets and php-secrets. I use
isdn4linux and not capi, when i start the connection with pon
isdn/provider i get:
unrecognized option `number
'outbound and not icmp[0] == 3 and not tcp[13] 4 != 0'
usepeerdns
ipcp-accept-local
ipcp-accept-remote
Wenn ich also pon isdn/provider eingebe bekomme ich:unrecognized
option `number`. Hat da wer eine Idee ?? capi habe ich nicht mehr drin,
läuft alles über isdn4linux wegen der Karte (fritz
.
Coloque também no grupo dialout.
Veja que isso não é desejável. Gostaria que o usuário comum pudesse simplesmente conectar e desconectar (pon, poff, plog), mas sem ter acesso ao conteudo dos arquivos.
Como se faz isso?
Aqui o meu ppp está com uma opção, já padrão, de hide-password, fazendo
com
a password no arquivo
/etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider.
Veja que isso não é desejável. Gostaria que o usuário comum pudesse
simplesmente conectar e desconectar (pon, poff, plog), mas sem ter acesso ao
conteudo dos arquivos.
Como se faz isso?
Sds.
Paulo.
Hi,
tja, das subject sagts eigentlich schon:
was macht pon in /etc/bash_completion.d?
Das steht dort drin, seitdem ich von woody zu sarge gewechselt habe.
Zumindest ist es mir vorher nicht aufgefallen.
Drinlassen oder loeschen?
Any hints?
ciao, Dirk
--
| Akkuschrauber-Kaufberatung
Dirk Salva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tja, das subject sagts eigentlich schon:
was macht pon in /etc/bash_completion.d?
Das steht dort drin, seitdem ich von woody zu sarge gewechselt habe.
Zumindest ist es mir vorher nicht aufgefallen.
Damit kannst du dann wahrscheinlich bash completion (falls
Moinmoin!
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 07:04:00PM +0200, Dirk Salva wrote:
was macht pon in /etc/bash_completion.d?
| $ dpkg -S /etc/bash_completion.d/pon
| ppp: /etc/bash_completion.d/pon
| $ zgrep completion /usr/share/doc/ppp/changelog.Debian.gz
| * Add bash completion script. (Closes: #170771
I did an apt-get upgrade and, now, when I execute pon, my modem
won't connect. The modem is seems to be making the same connection
sounds as before the upgrade; also, the modem is working in Window98.
I have before/after upgrade records from syslog. After upgrade,
I notice this message
Bonjour,
comment gerez vous pour une conection rtc le PON et le POFF.
J'utilise mozila sous sarge.
Comment fait t'on des racourcis pour lancer ces 2 commandes en mode
graphique.
Merci de vos reponses.
denis
un fil recent m'a permis de resoudre un soucis de conection RTC merci la
liste.
Le 22.06.2004 21:39:49, Famille Bailiet Denis, Marie-Christine, 3A a
écrit :
Bonjour,
comment gerez vous pour une conection rtc le PON et le POFF.
J'utilise mozila sous sarge.
Comment fait t'on des racourcis pour lancer ces 2 commandes en mode
graphique.
Sous gnome, dans le panel, vous vez
Le 12591ième jour après Epoch,
Jean-Luc Coulon écrivait:
Le 22.06.2004 21:39:49, Famille Bailiet Denis, Marie-Christine, 3A a
écrit :
Bonjour,
comment gerez vous pour une conection rtc le PON et le POFF.
J'utilise mozila sous sarge.
Comment fait t'on des racourcis pour lancer ces 2
Le Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:50:12 +0200, Famille Bailiet Denis,
Marie-Christine, 3A a écrit :
Comment fait t'on des racourcis pour lancer ces 2 commandes en mode
graphique.
J'utilise gkrellm, qui marche quel que soit le gestionnaire de fenêtres.
Il contient un bouton qui utilise pon et poff.
n.
Interesting problem, which I have never encountered. I set up my dial-in
with pppconfig, run pon and I connect to my ISP fine. Mozilla, lynx or
any other browser can't connect to anything on the net, however. Wrong
nameservers were my first thought, but they are dynamic, not static. Any
hints
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Hans wrote:
Interesting problem, which I have never encountered. I set up my dial-in
with pppconfig, run pon and I connect to my ISP fine. Mozilla, lynx or
any other browser can't connect to anything on the net, however. Wrong
nameservers were my first thought
Hans wrote:
Interesting problem, which I have never encountered. I set up my
dial-in with pppconfig, run pon and I connect to my ISP fine. Mozilla,
lynx or any other browser can't connect to anything on the net,
however. Wrong nameservers were my first thought, but they are
dynamic
Sebastiaan wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Hans wrote:
Interesting problem, which I have never encountered. I set up my dial-in
with pppconfig, run pon and I connect to my ISP fine. Mozilla, lynx or
any other browser can't connect to anything on the net, however. Wrong
nameservers were my
#this is for ppp0 configuration
auto ppp0
iface ppp0 inet ppp
up /etc/iptables/iptables.sh start
provider dsl-provider
down poff -a
post-down /etc/iptables/iptables.sh stop
1. You don't need the down line. ifdown runs pon and poff
for you.
2
Apparently, _Thomas Hood_, on 03/21/04 04:09,typed:
1. You don't need the down line. ifdown runs pon and poff
for you.
OK.
2. The up and post-down commands don't work properly with ppp ifaces.
See bug #127786. The problem is that ifup simply runs pon
and then the up commands; pon
/interfaces file to execute my
firewall scripts. I am totally new to this method and I have it sort of
working. But the problem is that I am not sure how ifup command relates
to the pon command. I can have the various commands executed as an
interface is brought up, but what happens if I just pon
Can anyone give me any clues as to why I need to run ifconfig xxx down
in order to use pon and modem? I haven't had a network until recently
but now that I do it would be nice to not need to turn the network off
in order to use my dialup connection.
Thanks for any ideas.
Ken
Ken writes:
Can anyone give me any clues as to why I need to run ifconfig xxx down
in order to use pon and modem?
You have probably made your network your default gateway. You don't want
to do that.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Hello,
I am using the Modem Lights Applet included in woody for Gnome 1.4. You
then have a little icon on the task bar in which you can connect,
discontect, watch modem lights, transfer activityetc. It uses pon
and poff command by default, but you can change it if needed. You can
find
Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 02:22:26PM +, Simon Tod wrote:
I thought gkdial would be just the ticket to use as a
'wrapper' around pon/poff - gpppon is too simplistic -
and it seems to work, reasonably well. BUT the dialog
box
gkdial would be just the ticket to use as a
'wrapper' around pon/poff - gpppon is too simplistic -
and it seems to work, reasonably well. BUT the dialog
box doesn't display the fact that it's successfully
connected and the counters that display bytes
transferred and length of connection stay at zero
out KDE and replaced it with Gnome, for the
accessibility tools.
I thought gkdial would be just the ticket to use as a
'wrapper' around pon/poff - gpppon is too simplistic -
and it seems to work, reasonably well. BUT the dialog
box doesn't display the fact that it's successfully
connected
and replaced it with Gnome, for the
accessibility tools.
I thought gkdial would be just the ticket to use as a
'wrapper' around pon/poff - gpppon is too simplistic -
and it seems to work, reasonably well. BUT the dialog
box doesn't display the fact that it's successfully
connected and the counters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 02:22:26PM +, Simon Tod wrote:
I thought gkdial would be just the ticket to use as a
'wrapper' around pon/poff - gpppon is too simplistic -
and it seems to work, reasonably well. BUT the dialog
box doesn't display
Hallo Ralph.
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:55:23AM +0100, Ralph Bergmann wrote:
[ . im Dateinamen im Verzeichnis /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/ ]
Das könnte das Problem gewesen sein. Als es nicht ging, da hatte ich
ein Punkt im Dateinamen, jetzt ist er nicht mehr da und es geht.
Könnte also am Punkt gelegen
Hallo Liste!
Ein kurze Frage: Werden die Scripte in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d bzw. ip-down.d
bei 'pon', 'poff' mit ausgeführt?
Danke!
Ralph
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit
Hallo Ralph,
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 04:59:00PM +0100, Ralph Bergmann wrote:
Ein kurze Frage: Werden die Scripte in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d bzw. ip-down.d
bei 'pon', 'poff' mit ausgeführt?
Kurze Antwort: Ja!
Grüße
Mathias
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Mathias Klein wrote:
Kurze Antwort: Ja!
Gibt es bestimmte Anforderungen an solch ein Script? Weil ich hab ein
Script welches mein dyndns aktualisieren soll, macht es aber nicht. Wenn
ich das Script dann aber von Hand starte, dann macht es das :(
Ralph
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und
Hallo,
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 06:23:47PM +0100, Ralph Bergmann wrote:
Mathias Klein wrote:
Kurze Antwort: Ja!
Gibt es bestimmte Anforderungen an solch ein Script? Weil ich hab ein
Script welches mein dyndns aktualisieren soll, macht es aber nicht. Wenn
ich das Script dann aber von
Ralph Bergmann schrieb:
Mathias Klein wrote:
Kurze Antwort: Ja!
Gibt es bestimmte Anforderungen an solch ein Script? Weil ich hab ein
Script welches mein dyndns aktualisieren soll, macht es aber nicht. Wenn
ich das Script dann aber von Hand starte, dann macht es das :(
wahrscheinlich
am Tue, dem 06.01.2004, um 18:23:47 +0100 mailte Ralph Bergmann folgendes:
Mathias Klein wrote:
Kurze Antwort: Ja!
Gibt es bestimmte Anforderungen an solch ein Script? Weil ich hab ein
Script welches mein dyndns aktualisieren soll, macht es aber nicht. Wenn
ich das Script dann aber
Reinhold Plew wrote:
wahrscheinlich startet Dein Script an der falschen Stelle. In ip-up.d
ist die Reihenfolge der Scripte wichtig.
Meinen Script habe ich 02ddns genannt und er startet somit zum richtigen
Zeitpunkt.
hmmm... mein Script startete garnicht. Als ich dann den Dateinamen etwas
Ralph Bergmann schrieb:
Reinhold Plew wrote:
wahrscheinlich startet Dein Script an der falschen Stelle. In ip-up.d
ist die Reihenfolge der Scripte wichtig.
Meinen Script habe ich 02ddns genannt und er startet somit zum
richtigen Zeitpunkt.
hmmm... mein Script startete garnicht. Als ich dann
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 the mental interface of
Reinhold Plew told:
Ralph Bergmann schrieb:
Reinhold Plew wrote:
wahrscheinlich startet Dein Script an der falschen Stelle. In ip-up.d
ist die Reihenfolge der Scripte wichtig.
Meinen Script habe ich 02ddns genannt und er startet somit zum
Ralph Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
Gibt es bestimmte Anforderungen an solch ein Script? Weil ich hab
ein Script welches mein dyndns aktualisieren soll, macht es aber
nicht. Wenn ich das Script dann aber von Hand starte, dann macht
es das :(
Dann gib dem Aufruf von ddclient mal den
Ralph Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ein kurze Frage: Werden die Scripte in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d bzw. ip-down.d
bei 'pon', 'poff' mit ausgeführt?
Kommt darauf an. Die Skripte werden beim Verbindungsauf- bzw. -abbau
ausgeführt. Je nach Einstellung muss pon nicht zum Verbindungsaufbau
führen
1 - 100 of 647 matches
Mail list logo
