,I've installed the missing i386 package as well as a lot of others
one.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 10:51 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 12:48 PM Mario Marietto
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello to everyone.
> >
> > I'm trying to compile wine-tkg from this rep
me/marietto/Scaricati/wine-tkg-git/wine-tkg-git#
> ./non-makepkg-build.sh
>
> => Installing package: libllvm12:i386 | Using apt
> E: Can't find package libllvm12:i386
> ==> WARNING: Failed to install package: libllvm12:i386
> => Installing apt-smart | Using pip
>
Yes, this is, where the entry "i386" is put in. I remember, to execute the
command "dpkg --add-architecture i386" a very long time ago.
Thus, aptitude now knows about it.
Zhanks for making things clearer.
Best
Hans
> Indeed, multi-arch is a dpkg thing. The list of current architectures
> is
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 12:37:06PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2024-06-16 at 12:18, Hans wrote:
>
> > I am wondering, why aptitude is showing me (incorrectlly?)
> > libllvm*:i386 and apt-get not.
> >
> > I have no i386 entry in sources.list, but where does aptitude get its
> > information?
>
sion and
installed-version information for both architectures for that package.
> aptitude search libllvm | grep i386
> What did I miss?
A difference in the default information displayed by the tools.
--
The Wanderer
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
per
I am wondering, why aptitude is showing me (incorrectlly?) libllvm*:i386 and
apt-get not.
I have no i386 entry in sources.list, but where does aptitude get its
information?
apt-cache search libllvm | grep i386
aptitude search libllvm | grep i386
o "add" another architecture to
your package sources.
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-tkg-git/wine-tkg-git#
> ./non-makepkg-build.sh
>
> => Installing package: libllvm12:i386 | Using apt
> E: Can't find package libllvm12:i386
> ==> WARNING: Failed to install package: libllvm12:i386
> => Installing apt-smart | Using pip
> error: externally-managed-env
Errata corrige :
that's not the correct package. The package I need is for i386.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 4:43 PM Mario Marietto
wrote:
> I've found the required package here :
>
>
> https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20220531T025502Z/pool/main/l/llvm-toolchain-12/libl
I've found the required package here :
https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20220531T025502Z/pool/main/l/llvm-toolchain-12/libllvm12_12.0.1-21_amd64.deb
But according with this post :
https://www.reddit.com/r/debian/comments/rbeq4o/libllvm12_package_is_breaking_steam/
it seems
On Sun 16 Jun 2024 at 15:41:59 (+0200), Mario Marietto wrote:
> root@debian-now:/home/marietto/Scaricati/wine-tkg-git/wine-tkg-git# apt
> install libllvm12:i386
> E: Can't find package libllvm12:i386
>
> So,I would like to know how to install the package "libllvm12:i386&qu
Hello to everyone.
I'm trying to compile wine-tkg from this repo :
https://github.com/Frogging-Family/wine-tkg-git
This is what I did,according with the short tutorial :
root@debian-now:/home/marietto/Scaricati/wine-tkg-git/wine-tkg-git#
./non-makepkg-build.sh
=> Installing package: libllv
Hi,
Le 16/06/2024, Dmitry a écrit:
> if press `u` => iuA => Update
> if pres `-` => idA => Delete
> if press `_` => ipA => Purge
> if press `=` => ihA => Hold
>
> But how to go back to `i A`?
I believe you are looking for `:`, aka “keep”. This is less
strong/persistent than `=` (Hold).
Hi.
When I take a look at a package line in the SecurityUpdates of the
TextUserInterface of Autitude I see `PackageName i A`
if press `u` => iuA => Update
if pres `-` => idA => Delete
if press `_` => ipA => Purge
if press `=` => ihA => Hold
But how to go back to `
On 2024-06-13 22:15:05 +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
> Hello,
>
> El jue., 13 jun. 2024 20:48, Vincent Lefevre escribió:
>
> > On 2024-06-13 14:43:25 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:57:59PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > >
The "whois" package has "Priority: standard".
According to the Debian policy[*]:
standard
These packages provide a reasonably small but not too limited
character-mode system. This is what will be installed by default
if the user doesn’t select anything else
On 2024-06-13 14:43:25 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:57:59PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > The "whois" package has "Priority: standard".
>
> hobbit:~$ apt-cache show whois | grep Priority
> Priority: optional
qaa:~> apt-
Hello,
El jue., 13 jun. 2024 20:48, Vincent Lefevre escribió:
> On 2024-06-13 14:43:25 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:57:59PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > The "whois" package has "Priority: standard".
> >
> &
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:57:59PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> The "whois" package has "Priority: standard".
hobbit:~$ apt-cache show whois | grep Priority
Priority: optional
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 06:59:49AM +0200, Kamil Jońca wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de writes:
[...]
> > and of course, if you are using a desktop environment and NetworkManager
> > or systemd-networkd, it's probably better to go with the flow and let
> > them do.
>
> About year ago none of them was
to...@tuxteam.de writes:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 06:30:27AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [following up on myself, bad style, I know]
>
>> For my laptop, I very much prefer to say "sudo ifup eth0" than to
>> say "sudo ifup en0ps&&@*#!☠" thankyouverymuch :)
>
> and of course, if you are
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 06:30:27AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[following up on myself, bad style, I know]
> For my laptop, I very much prefer to say "sudo ifup eth0" than to
> say "sudo ifup en0ps&&@*#!☠" thankyouverymuch :)
and of course, if you are using a desktop environment and
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 03:16:41PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 09:01:44PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > Mine loks like this:
> >
> > GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet net.ifnames=0"
>
> People who are thinking of doing this should take a moment to
Richard wrote:
> Good catch. With the title of this thread and not seeing any proper
> description of what's actually wrong on GitHub, I figured the change
> of the adapter name was meant. Yes, with MAC randomization, that's
> what you'll get. But it's nothing Debian defaults to. So question is,
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 09:01:44PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> No need. You can have your traditional names (I do). Just add
> "net.ifnames=0" (if necessry separated by a space, should
> other stuff be already there) to your GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT
> in your /etc/default/grub, then ru
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 02:30:40PM -0400, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 June 2024 06:54:54 am Richard wrote:
> > But also, just
> > searching the web for this topic, you should have come across this
> > answering your questions: https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkInterfaceNames
> >
>
On Wednesday 12 June 2024 06:54:54 am Richard wrote:
> But also, just
> searching the web for this topic, you should have come across this
> answering your questions: https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkInterfaceNames
>
Wow. Just wow...
That sort of thing just drives me crazy! :-)
I can see
Good catch. With the title of this thread and not seeing any proper
description of what's actually wrong on GitHub, I figured the change of the
adapter name was meant. Yes, with MAC randomization, that's what you'll
get. But it's nothing Debian defaults to. So question is, can this be
disabled on
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:33 AM Richard wrote:
>
> Question is, does it make that much sense to report it to Debian directly?
> Are you encountering this issue on Debian itself or
> Armbian/Raspbian/whatever? You reported this to the Raspberry Pi GitHub, so
> I'd expect them to take this up
Question is, does it make that much sense to report it to Debian directly?
Are you encountering this issue on Debian itself or
Armbian/Raspbian/whatever? You reported this to the Raspberry Pi GitHub, so
I'd expect them to take this up with the upstream devs themselves, so by
the time Trixie is
Hello,
This bug, or a close relative, has already been reported in
https://github.com/raspberrypi/bookworm-feedback/issues/239
as 'Predictable network names broken for ASIX USB ethernet in kernel 6.6.20'
I added a comment reporting my experience in Proxmox here:
If it where an issue with pip or pipx, yes. But as you pointed out
yourself, it's also happening on OpenSuse, so the issue can't be pip or
pipx, but rather either what you are trying to install or your
understanding of it.
Am So., 2. Juni 2024 um 14:20 Uhr schrieb Richmond :
> I am not
Richard writes:
> python3 -m venv venv
> source venv/bin/activate
> pip install musicpy
OK thanks. And apparently to get idle working I do:
python -m idlelib.idle
Richard writes:
> That's how its done. Also, complaining here about something that
> doesn't even work on other distros and thus can't be a Debian
> problem doesn't make that much sense.
I am not complaining, I am trying to find out how to get it working. And
as pip (and pipx) are debian
ack on Debian, I removed the one package installed with pipx, which
> was musicpy, then tried to install it with pip, but got this message
> which actually tells me to use pipx. (There is no package python-musicpy).
>
> pip install musicpy
> error: externally-managed-environment
>
OK Back on Debian, I removed the one package installed with pipx, which
was musicpy, then tried to install it with pip, but got this message
which actually tells me to use pipx. (There is no package python-musicpy).
pip install musicpy
error: externally-managed-environment
× This environment
ot the layout error so:
1065 pip install layout
cured the layout error but then I got a gui error
1067 pip install gui
There is no such package.
.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/idle.py", line 26, in
gui.mainloop()
NameError: name 'gui' is not defined
ch pipx for anything that's not meant as a standalone CLI program, like
yt-dlp, speedtest and the sorts. Maybe that way you can't do that much
wrong.
At this point this is hardly a Debian related topic. You should first learn
more about Python venvs and their package managers.
>
Richard writes:
> A packages documentation is always your best friend: https://pypi.org
> /project/idle/
>
Yes it makes it look easy there, but:
import idle
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File ".local/pipx/shared/lib/python3.11/site-packages/idle.py", line 4, in
A packages documentation is always your best friend:
https://pypi.org/project/idle/
Also, python script isn't a necessarily a standalone executable. And also,
you shouldn't just wildly mix pipx commands with pip commands if you don't
know what you are doing. Either create a venv with python3 -m
Richard writes:
> Pretty much just what pipx does.
>
Well I don't know how.
Now I need to run idle in my new environment. I have installed it
.local/pipx/shared/bin/pip install idle
and it is here:
.local/pipx/shared/lib/python3.11/site-packages/idle.py
but I don't know how to run it. I
Pretty much just what pipx does.
On Sat, Jun 1, 2024, 22:00 Richmond wrote:
>
> I got it working by doing:
>
> python3 -m venv .local/pipx/venvs/musicpy/
>
> .local/pipx/venvs/musicpy/bin/python3.11
>
> Then I was able to import musicpy from the python shell.
>
> How bewildering!
>
> Thanks.
>
Richard writes:
> That's the point of venv's. pipx runpip should do the trick. Or the
> classic way: source path/to/venv/bin/activate. That way you activate
> the position virtual environment (venv) created in that directory
> with all packages installed in that venv.
>
I got it working by
That's the point of venv's. pipx runpip should do the trick. Or the classic
way: source path/to/venv/bin/activate. That way you activate the position
virtual environment (venv) created in that directory with all packages
installed in that venv.
Richard
On Sat, Jun 1, 2024, 19:10 Richmond wrote:
Richard writes:
> Looking at the package, no wonder it fails. musicpy doesn't contain
> anything that can be executed. So pipx run can't work for obvious
> reasons. You'll have to install it with pipx install and use it in a
> python script.
>
> https://pypi.org/project/musicp
Looking at the package, no wonder it fails. musicpy doesn't contain
anything that can be executed. So pipx run can't work for obvious reasons.
You'll have to install it with pipx install and use it in a python script.
https://pypi.org/project/musicpy/
Richard
On Sat, Jun 1, 2024, 18:40 Richmond
Richard writes:
> If you haven't closed the terminal window/logged out, you need to run
> source .bashrc. Running pipx ensurepath should have said something
> like that.
Yes, I did this:
>
> (logged out and in to get updated PATH)
scription
>
> with not much success.
>
> I have done these:
>
> sudo aptitude install pip
> sudo aptitude install pipx
> pipx ensurepath
> pipx install --include-deps musicpy
>
> (logged out and in to get updated PATH)
>
> pipx run musicpy
> 'musicpy' executable
'musicpy' executable script not found in package 'musicpy'.
Available executable scripts:
I think it is installed, but how do I run it?
On 2024-05-27 18:42:48 +0300, mindaugascelies...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, May 27, 2024 5:59:55 PM EEST Nicolas George wrote:
> > Eben King (12024-05-27):
> > > Is there an easier way to uninstall a package and everything it brought in
> > > at one swell foop? Th
(Where mrc-mars is my top level metapackage. For *me*, that is the
only manual package I ever want on a machine.)
If I see something that it wants to purge but I do actually want, I
add it to my personal metapackage (build and push) and then do the
above again.
mrc
Am Montag, 27. Mai 2024, 17:51:23 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 04:59:55PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Eben King (12024-05-27):
> > > Is there an easier way to uninstall a package and everything it brought
> > > in
>
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 04:59:55PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Eben King (12024-05-27):
> > Is there an easier way to uninstall a package and everything it brought in
> > at one swell foop? Thanks.
>
> The packages you did not choose to install but were installed as a
&g
On Mon, 27 May 2024 10:57:54 -0400
Eben King wrote:
Hello Eben,
>Is there an easier way to uninstall a package and everything it brought
>in at one swell foop? Thanks.
apt/apt-get autoremove
or
apt/apt-get autoremove --purge
The first removes the packages installed as depend
On Monday, May 27, 2024 5:59:55 PM EEST Nicolas George wrote:
> Eben King (12024-05-27):
> > Is there an easier way to uninstall a package and everything it brought in
> > at one swell foop? Thanks.
>
> The packages you did not choose to install but were installed as a
&g
Eben King (12024-05-27):
> Is there an easier way to uninstall a package and everything it brought in
> at one swell foop? Thanks.
The packages you did not choose to install but were installed as a
consequence are shown by apt-get when you do almost anything:
The following package
Hey. Occasionally I'll install a package and it brings some other
dependencies with it. Fine. Then if I decide it doesn't work for me and
want to uninstall it, I have to go to the installation history, see what was
installed with it, and for each one find it and flag it for removal. You
can
Le 4/24/24 à 13:11, Dan Ritter a écrit> Also, I think you have meanings
reversed.
apt-cache depends psmisc
produces the list of packages that psmisc needs to function.
apt-cache rdepends psmisc
produces the list of packages that need psmisc to be installed
first.
-dsr-
Dan,
Thank you
On Thu 09 May 2024 at 16:24:55 (-), Curt wrote:
> On 2024-05-09, Charles Curley wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 May 2024 14:09:52 - (UTC) Curt wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think there is a process by which you could add closed-source
> >> IBM software to a bona fide Debian depository, even the non-free
On 2024-05-09, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2024 14:09:52 - (UTC)
> Curt wrote:
>
>> I don't think there is a process by which you could add closed-source
>> IBM software to a bona fide Debian depository, even the non-free one,
>> which only seems to contain firmware and drivers for
On Thu, 9 May 2024 14:09:52 - (UTC)
Curt wrote:
> I don't think there is a process by which you could add closed-source
> IBM software to a bona fide Debian depository, even the non-free one,
> which only seems to contain firmware and drivers for closed-sourced
> *hardware*.
Isn't that what
On 2024-05-09, kiruthikaanbusuresh wrote:
>
> Hi Debian Team,
> There is a package by name rsct which is specific to IBM. I would like to
> know the process to get this added to the Debian Distro. Should I have
> to get sponsorship for getting it added to Debian ?
Seems IB
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 06:12:35PM +0530, kiruthikaanbusuresh wrote:
> Hi Debian Team,
> There is a package by name rsct which is specific to IBM. I would like to
> know the process to get this added to the Debian Distro.
Start with sharing more information about it.
* Tell what &q
Hi,
kiruthikaanbusuresh wrote:
> Hi Debian Team,
Standard disclaimer: We are the users. A team only by coincidence.
(And you seem not to be subscribed to the mailing list.
Thus i CC: your mail address.)
> There is a package by name rsct which is specific to IBM. I
> would lik
Hi Debian Team,
There is a package by name rsct which is specific to IBM. I would like to
know the process to get this added to the Debian Distro. Should I have
to get sponsorship for getting it added to Debian ?
Thanks and Regards,
Kiruthika. NV
Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> In my ongoing mission for precise package management,
> I embarked on a quest to swiftly locate all installed packages dependent on
> /mysql-server/.
> Swift reconnaissance led me to /aptitude/, our stalwart ally in the Debian
> arsenal.
> Executing a
Debian Users,
In my ongoing mission for precise package management,
I embarked on a quest to swiftly locate all installed packages dependent on
/mysql-server/.
Swift reconnaissance led me to /aptitude/, our stalwart ally in the Debian
arsenal.
Executing a tactical maneuver akin
, or that emulate the application.
However, they do not seem to exist on bullseye. Older
releases had more HPLX packages.
I searched the package database. but all I found is lx-gdb,
which is not useful for this case. The site I used does not
seem to go before buster. Also, I am not sure how to use
Hola,
doncs això que sembla que aquest "bug" torna a estar present.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2014/01/msg00218.html
M'estic barallant amb una arrencada dual d'una linkat i una debian totes
dues amb les particions arrel i swap xifrades.
Per no haver de posar dues vegades el
Le 06/03/2024 à 18:19, ke6jti a écrit :
Hi,
I have a possible kernel regression for a usb-dvb tuner card. I know
the error in dmesg points to kernel : au0828 but I am not sure what
package this belongs to. I think it belongs to v4l(video for linux)
but I am still not sure what specific v4l
Hi,
I have a possible kernel regression for a usb-dvb tuner card. I know
the error in dmesg points to kernel : au0828 but I am not sure what
package this belongs to. I think it belongs to v4l(video for linux) but
I am still not sure what specific v4l package.
Thanks for you help.
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:56:54 +
debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Hello debian-u...@howorth.org.uk,
>Does the # character at the start of the deb-src line matter?
Yes; It comments out deb-src as a repo, so it can't/won't be used.
--
Regards _ "Valid sig separator is
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 11:56:54AM +, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> thyme after thyme wrote:
> > * debian.list
> > # Debian Stable.
> > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main contrib non-free
> > non-free-firmware
> > deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security
http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/mxlinux/packages/mx/testrepo/
> bookworm test
>
> #ahs hardware stack repo
> #deb http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/mxlinux/packages/mx/repo/
> bookworm ahs
>
> > Note that Debian might have some patches to make the package
> >
ller to find the sources. Something akin
> > to:
> >
> > deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ bullseye-updates main contrib
> > non-free
>
> I'm on bookworm. Pasting my current sources below. Is something missing?
Hm. The package "xfce4-screensaver" does
bookworm
main non-free
#deb http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/mxlinux/packages/mx/testrepo/
bookworm test
#ahs hardware stack repo
#deb http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/mxlinux/packages/mx/repo/
bookworm ahs
> Note that Debian might have some patches to make the package
> buildable in De
nsaver
[sudo] password for m:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package build-dep
~ [100] $
The man page tells me the syntax is actually apt-get build-dep [pkg],
not apt-get install build-dep [pkg]. That gets me to her
; > sudo apt-get install build-dep
>
> I get an error:
>
> ~ $ sudo apt-get install build-dep xfce4-screensaver
> [sudo] password for m:
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Reading state information... Done
> E: Unable
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 09:23:52AM +, thyme after thyme wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm not a developer, but I'm trying to build xfce4-screensaver and
> suspect I may be missing a development package.
>
> I've sudo apt-get installed everything on this list:
> https://
Hello everyone,
I'm not a developer, but I'm trying to build xfce4-screensaver and
suspect I may be missing a development package.
I've sudo apt-get installed everything on this list:
https://salsa.debian.org/xfce-extras-team/xfce4-screensaver/blob/debian/master/debian/control#L6
When I try
On Tue Feb 27, 2024 at 7:12 AM GMT, Frank Weißer wrote:
> So we are at my original question: Which package to file a bug report ?
Package "debian-installer", I think; and/or submit an installation report,
which can be done with reportbug against the "installation-report&qu
Marco Moock:
Am Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:59:41 +0100
schrieb Frank Weißer :
The installer does format it as ext4, but shows ext2 and places that
in fstab, what ends up in emergency mode. That's why I'm here
That is definitely a bug.
So we are at my original question: Which package to file
Am Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:59:41 +0100
schrieb Frank Weißer :
> First of all: I use german during installation; but I doubt that is
> relevant.
Try to reproduce it in English if you like.
> Marco Moock:
> > Am 22.02.2024 schrieb Frank Weißer :
> >
> >> I only choose ext2 for formatting the
First of all: I use german during installation; but I doubt that is
relevant.
Marco Moock:
Am 22.02.2024 schrieb Frank Weißer :
I only choose ext2 for formatting the encrypted partition, because
nothing else is offered.
That is really strange. If I did install Debian 12, it offered me a
Am 22.02.2024 schrieb Frank Weißer :
> I only choose ext2 for formatting the encrypted partition, because
> nothing else is offered.
That is really strange. If I did install Debian 12, it offered me a
list of different file systems, including ext2/3/4.
> Despite that the partition in fact is
Marco Moock:
Am 22.02.2024 um 13:18:48 Uhr schrieb Frank Weißer:
I use to encrypt my swap and /var/tmp partitions during
installation.
That is LUKS.
the partition tool in debian installer offers me randomized keys
for that and has 'delete partition' set to 'yes', which costs lot
of
Am 22.02.2024 um 13:18:48 Uhr schrieb Frank Weißer:
> I use to encrypt my swap and /var/tmp partitions during installation.
That is LUKS.
> the partition tool in debian installer offers me randomized keys for
> that and has 'delete partition' set to 'yes', which costs lot of
> time, not
on reboot I end up in emergency mode.
What package have I to file the bug report against?
Please apologize my poor english.
Kind regards
readU
Frank
On Thu, 2024-02-15 at 20:33 -0500, Neal Heinecke wrote:
> I need to identify the package responsible for creating the software
> sources window. There is a minor bug/typo where the first tab reads
> "Ubuntu Software"
This could be synaptic?
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/
On 16/02/2024 21:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:05:28PM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
I suspect that program name is the question. If "ps awf" gives no clue then
perhaps the following may help (untested):
On 2024-02-16 at 09:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:33:16 -0500 Neal Heinecke wrote:
>>>
>>>> I need to identify the package responsible for creating the
>>>> software sources window. There is a minor bug/typo where the
>>>
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:05:28PM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 16/02/2024 12:16, Charles Curley wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:33:16 -0500
> > Neal Heinecke wrote:
> >
> > > I need to identify the package responsible for creating the software
> > > so
On 16/02/2024 12:16, Charles Curley wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:33:16 -0500
Neal Heinecke wrote:
I need to identify the package responsible for creating the software
sources window. There is a minor bug/typo where the first tab reads
"Ubuntu Software"
I have no idea what a
On 2/16/24, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:33:16 -0500
> Neal Heinecke wrote:
>
>> I need to identify the package responsible for creating the software
>> sources window. There is a minor bug/typo where the first tab reads
>> "Ubuntu Software"
> I need to identify the package responsible for creating the software
> sources window. There is a minor bug/typo where the first tab reads
> "Ubuntu Software"
If all else fails, you can always try something like:
find / -mount -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep -al "U
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 12:27 AM Neal Heinecke wrote:
>
> I need to identify the package responsible for creating the software sources
> window. There is a minor bug/typo where the first tab reads "Ubuntu Software"
If you can locate the program that owns the window, th
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:33:16 -0500
Neal Heinecke wrote:
> I need to identify the package responsible for creating the software
> sources window. There is a minor bug/typo where the first tab reads
> "Ubuntu Software"
I have no idea what a "software sources window&q
I need to identify the package responsible for creating the software
sources window. There is a minor bug/typo where the first tab reads "Ubuntu
Software"
Thanks!
On 1/30/24 1:43 PM, Michael Kjörling wrote:
https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#file-conflicts
should help.
Sure. Thanks!
On 1/30/24 1:40 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-S65GMD/8-marco-common_1.24.1-3_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite
'/usr/share/themes/Gorilla/metacity-1/metacity-theme-1.xml', which is
also in package gnome-themes-more 0.9.0.deb0.8
Where do you get 'gnome-themes-more
1 - 100 of 13711 matches
Mail list logo
