[SOLVED] Re: speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-05-17 Thread Franco Martelli
On 30/04/24 at 14:07, Alexandre Rossi wrote: Hi, Basically I've the same issue described here: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1180389/speaker-test-returns-all-6-channels-to-front-speakers The speaker-test program is provided by the alsa-utils package. I'm using Debian 12 Bookworm, I've

Test

2024-05-11 Thread Alex PADOLY
Ceci est un email pour vérifier la réception des messages de la liste. Envoyé avec la messagerie sécurisée [Proton Mail.](https://proton.me/)

Re: speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-05-10 Thread Franco Martelli
Hi Alexandre, On 07/05/24 at 11:56, Alexandre Rossi wrote: My hypothesis: speaker-test outputs directly to ALSA (kernel) but ALSA redirects to pulseaudio (the 99-pulse.conf file) and pulseaudio Output profile is stereo. Therefore, pulseaudio downmixes 5.1 to stereo. That would explain why only

Re: speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-05-07 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi, > > My understanding is that pulseaudio uses alsa for kernel interface and > > that speaker-test uses alsa directly. So if one cannot get speaker-test > > to sound right, it cannot work with pulseaudio. That why I suggest > > workarounds > > in alsa conf (a

Re: speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-05-06 Thread Franco Martelli
daemon, maybe I've pulseaudio daemon misconfiguration My understanding is that pulseaudio uses alsa for kernel interface and that speaker-test uses alsa directly. So if one cannot get speaker-test to sound right, it cannot work with pulseaudio. That why I suggest workarounds in alsa conf (asoundrc

Re: speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-05-02 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi, > > > The issue is that speaker-test doesn't play sound to the correct speaker. > > > If > > > I run: > > > > > > ~$ speaker-test -Dplug:surround51 -c6 -s3 -f75 > > > > > > The sound comes from (Center), (Front right), (Rear l

Re: speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-05-01 Thread Franco Martelli
Hi Alexandre, On 30/04/24 at 14:07, Alexandre Rossi wrote: Hi, Basically I've the same issue described here: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1180389/speaker-test-returns-all-6-channels-to-front-speakers The speaker-test program is provided by the alsa-utils package. I'm using Debian 12

Re: speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-04-30 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi, > Basically I've the same issue described here: > https://askubuntu.com/questions/1180389/speaker-test-returns-all-6-channels-to-front-speakers > > The speaker-test program is provided by the alsa-utils package. I'm using > Debian 12 Bookworm, I've no ~/.asoundrc file. My /pr

speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-04-29 Thread Franco Martelli
Hi everyone, Basically I've the same issue described here: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1180389/speaker-test-returns-all-6-channels-to-front-speakers The speaker-test program is provided by the alsa-utils package. I'm using Debian 12 Bookworm, I've no ~/.asoundrc file. My /proc/asound

test

2024-04-13 Thread Frank McCormick
test

Test

2024-04-11 Thread D
Hi debian users

test of a gnuplot bug visible with Pango 1.52 (Debian/unstable)

2024-02-29 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Hi, Since the upgrade of the Pango library to 1.52 in Debian/unstable, I'm seeing an annoying bug in gnuplot with the wxt terminal. The issue can be reproduced with the following command: echo 'set terminal wxt; plot x' | gnuplot -persist A window appears, but it is not drawn and it cannot be

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-25 Thread Max Nikulin
On 26/01/2024 07:09, Stefan Monnier wrote: systemctl --user status pipewire{,-pulse} wireplumber which shows that `wireplumber` failed to start. I was assuming that systemctl --user --failed journalctl --user --boot and as root systemctl --failed journalctl --boot

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-25 Thread Stefan Monnier
> The problem might be in between of > > lspci -vnn Spews out a lot of stuff, the relevant part being presumably: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller [8086:284b] (rev 03) Subsystem: Lenovo ThinkPad T61/R61 [17aa:20ac]

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-25 Thread Max Nikulin
On 24/01/2024 04:28, Stefan Monnier wrote: But since `pactl` seems to still be useful for Pipewire, I tried `pavucontrol` and it shows me no device from which to select in the "Output Devices". Now, how do I figure out why that is? The problem might be in between of lspci -vnn and

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-23 Thread Stefan Monnier
> But since `pactl` seems to still be useful for Pipewire, I tried > `pavucontrol` and it shows me no device from which to select in the > "Output Devices". Hmm... actually, not quite: there is one output device, called "Dummy Output". And there is similarly just one input device listed, called

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-23 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> Server Version: 15.0.0 >> Default Sample Specification: float32le 2ch 48000Hz >> Default Channel Map: front-left,front-right >> Default Sink: @DEFAULT_SINK@ >> Default Source: @DEFAULT_SOURCE@ >> Cookie: 40db:2cde >> % >> >> Not sure what the `Cookie` does and even

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-23 Thread Dan Ritter
Stefan Monnier wrote: > Server Version: 15.0.0 > Default Sample Specification: float32le 2ch 48000Hz > Default Channel Map: front-left,front-right > Default Sink: @DEFAULT_SINK@ > Default Source: @DEFAULT_SOURCE@ > Cookie: 40db:2cde > % > > Not sure what the `Cookie`

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-23 Thread Stefan Monnier
> OK. First diagnostic: `pactl info`. > > On my bookworm desktop, I get this: > > $ pactl info > Server String: /run/user/1042/pulse/native > Library Protocol Version: 35 > Server Protocol Version: 35 > Is Local: yes > Client Index: 13692 > Tile Size: 65472 > User Name: dsr > Host Name: spike >

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-22 Thread Dan Ritter
Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Does mplayer give any more interesting errors? > > Oh, I didn't notice it at first, but now that you ask, yes it does: > after something like a timeout period it says: > > AO: [pulse] Init failed: Timeout > Failed to initialize audio driver 'pulse' > > And lo

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Max Nikulin
On 22/01/2024 04:26, Charles Curley wrote: You and I seem to be having similar problems. No, you don't. Charles, your graphics adapter is supported by i965, but not iHD and vainfo reports a number of profiles https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20240113101948.0a880f26@hawk.localdomain

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Stefan Monnier
> Does mplayer give any more interesting errors? Oh, I didn't notice it at first, but now that you ask, yes it does: after something like a timeout period it says: AO: [pulse] Init failed: Timeout Failed to initialize audio driver 'pulse' And lo and behold if I start it with `mplayer

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Charles Curley
On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 18:51:17 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: > So, IIUC the problem is that the hardware video decoder drivers aren't > found for some reason. I checked my VA-related packages and they seem > to be installed: > > # aptitude search '\' | grep '^i' > i A i965-va-driver -

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2024-01-20 18:51 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Whenever I try to view videos in Firefox in my trusty Thinkpad T61, > Firefox just eats up the CPU but doesn't actually show the video. > > At startup I get the following message: > > [GFX1-]: vaapitest: VA-API t

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Dan Ritter
Stefan Monnier wrote: > > This should be the Intel 4500 integrated gpu, which is part of > > the i915/i965 family. It needs: > > > > - an intel kernel module > > According to `lsmod | grep '^i'` I have `i915` loaded. Is that the one? Yes. > > - X11 running the intel video driver > >

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Stefan Monnier
> This should be the Intel 4500 integrated gpu, which is part of > the i915/i965 family. It needs: > > - an intel kernel module According to `lsmod | grep '^i'` I have `i915` loaded. Is that the one? > - X11 running the intel video driver Interesting. I was using the `modesetting` driver. So

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Dan Ritter
Stefan Monnier wrote: > Whenever I try to view videos in Firefox in my trusty Thinkpad T61, > Firefox just eats up the CPU but doesn't actually show the video. > > At startup I get the following message: > > [GFX1-]: vaapitest: VA-API test failed: failed to initialise V

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Stefan Monnier
Max Nikulin [2024-01-21 10:51:36] wrote: > On 21/01/2024 06:51, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> [GFX1-]: vaapitest: VA-API test failed: failed to initialise VAAPI >> connection. > [...] >> Any idea what might be going on? Any hint how I could diagnose the problem? > I

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-20 Thread Max Nikulin
On 21/01/2024 06:51, Stefan Monnier wrote: [GFX1-]: vaapitest: VA-API test failed: failed to initialise VAAPI connection. [...] Any idea what might be going on? Any hint how I could diagnose the problem? I would start from comparison of "vainfo" output and relate

Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-20 Thread Stefan Monnier
Whenever I try to view videos in Firefox in my trusty Thinkpad T61, Firefox just eats up the CPU but doesn't actually show the video. At startup I get the following message: [GFX1-]: vaapitest: VA-API test failed: failed to initialise VAAPI connection. So, IIUC the problem

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread tomas
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 05:32:04PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: [...] > Perhaps you should use debian-lists-test, > <https://lists.debian.org/debian-lists-test/>. **THANK YOU** (I know, I'm breaking my promise of bowing out of this thread, but this is just the kind of constructive

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread tomas
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 09:08:11PM +, Tixy wrote: > On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: > > This is a test of the emergency broadcast system > > Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. Folks: the OP might be a bit of a challenge to some

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread fjd
On Sat, 23 Dec 2023, Vít Smolík wrote: Should someone report the mail to the mailmasters as stated in here: https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html Or is it too small of an issue to even report? it's teensy. fjd -- Davis Verbum sat sapienti.

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread Vít Smolík
Vít Smolík (12023-12-23): Yeah, it is the Code of Conduct, sorry, didn't realize that. Could there be some SpamAssassin config that we could send to the list-masters, that would catch theese kinds of messages? Not without catching some legitimate questions and answers too. “Test” is a very

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread Nicolas George
Vít Smolík (12023-12-23): > Yeah, it is the Code of Conduct, sorry, didn't realize that. Could there be > some SpamAssassin config that we could send to the list-masters, that would > catch theese kinds of messages? Not without catching some legitimate questions and answers too. “Test”

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread Vít Smolík
.” And for people who pretend they did notice, it also the seventh rule: “Do not send "test" messages to determine whether your mail client is working.” At this point, people should ignore that person. I could suggest sending them answers that seem legit but will cause them to break thei

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread Nicolas George
elcome.” And for people who pretend they did notice, it also the seventh rule: “Do not send "test" messages to determine whether your mail client is working.” At this point, people should ignore that person. I could suggest sending them answers that seem legit but will cause them to brea

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread Vít Smolík
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 4:37 PM Pocket wrote: On 12/22/23 16:08, Tixy wrote: On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: This is a test of the emergency broadcast system Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. I am not spamming this list I am trying

Re: Test

2023-12-22 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 4:37 PM Pocket wrote: > > On 12/22/23 16:08, Tixy wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: > >> This is a test of the emergency broadcast system > > > > Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list.

Re: Test

2023-12-22 Thread Tom Furie
Pocket writes: > On 12/22/23 16:08, Tixy wrote: >> On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: >>> This is a test of the emergency broadcast system >> Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. > > I am not spamming this list I am t

Re: Test

2023-12-22 Thread Pocket
On 12/22/23 16:08, Tixy wrote: On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: This is a test of the emergency broadcast system Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. I am not spamming this list I am trying to determine if my email setup is working.

Re: Test

2023-12-22 Thread Lee
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 4:08 PM Tixy wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: > > This is a test of the emergency broadcast system > > Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. Would forwarding his message to commun...@debian.org an

Re: Test

2023-12-22 Thread Tixy
On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: > This is a test of the emergency broadcast system Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. -- Tixy

Test

2023-12-22 Thread Pocket
This is a test of the emergency broadcast system

Re: Seeking an sftp location to test a problem?

2023-10-26 Thread john doe
On 10/26/23 15:47, Karen Lewellen wrote: Because shellworld is theonly such door I know of, I need a completely objective sftp location for testing, username  and password. Googling around would lead you to something like [1]. [1] https://www.sftp.net/public-online-sftp-servers -- John Doe

Seeking an sftp location to test a problem?

2023-10-26 Thread Karen Lewellen
Hi folks, Its Karen Lewellen. Going to ask this question carefully. I am having a computer built, due to a combination of experiences, DOS remains my main system. However I do use sftp to reach a Linux shell service called shellworld. Recently when I type exit, or bye, to leave sftp it reboots

Re: HS: test après coupure du mail.

2023-08-23 Thread Informatique BILLARD
Bonjour oui cela ne m'est pas venu à l'esprit. Cordialement Le 23/08/2023 à 15:57, François TOURDE a écrit : Le 19592ième jour après Epoch, Informatique BILLARD écrivait: Test François-Marie Selon https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct il faut éviter d'envoyer ce genre de

Re: HS: test après coupure du mail.

2023-08-23 Thread François TOURDE
Le 19592ième jour après Epoch, Informatique BILLARD écrivait: > Test > > François-Marie Selon https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct il faut éviter d'envoyer ce genre de messages. Tu peux toujours t'adresser à Majordomo pour voir l'état de ton inscription. Extrait

HS: test après coupure du mail.

2023-08-23 Thread Informatique BILLARD
Test François-Marie

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-21 Thread Dan Ritter
krys...@ibse.cz wrote: > Dan Ritter wrote: > > The kernel announces readiness during boot with: > > dmesg:[ 18.331561] EDAC amd64: Node 0: DRAM ECC enabled. > > > > and then an event looks like this: > > Message from syslogd@HOSTNAME at Jan 25 15:05:51 ... > > kernel:[5964975.397283] [Hardware

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-21 Thread krystof
Dan Ritter wrote: > The kernel announces readiness during boot with: > dmesg:[ 18.331561] EDAC amd64: Node 0: DRAM ECC enabled. > > and then an event looks like this: > Message from syslogd@HOSTNAME at Jan 25 15:05:51 ... > kernel:[5964975.397283] [Hardware Error]: Corrected error, no > action

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-21 Thread Dan Ritter
Anssi Saari wrote: > Dan Ritter writes: > > > We see ECC errors irregularly and infrequently on both Intel and > > AMD CPUs. > > How/where do you see those on a Debian system? I looked into this > briefly but didn't get anywhere. The kernel announces readiness during boot with: dmesg:[

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-21 Thread Anssi Saari
krys...@ibse.cz writes: > PS: Some commercial memtests should allegedly be able to inject ECC > errors (for example the one from passmark), have anyone tried those? I've tried Passmark's memory tester (the commercial one which includes ECC error injection), but I've had no luck. My desktop has

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-21 Thread Anssi Saari
Dan Ritter writes: > We see ECC errors irregularly and infrequently on both Intel and > AMD CPUs. How/where do you see those on a Debian system? I looked into this briefly but didn't get anywhere.

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread krystof
Dne úterý 21. února 2023 1:20:50 CET, DdB napsal(a): > Lucky me, i just looked up my hardware (Dual CPU on server MB): > > > https://versus.com/en/amd-epyc-7282 > > Supports ECC memory Yes, but it is sad that you have to search for this information somewhere else than on vendors website. But

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread DdB
Am 20.02.2023 um 23:48 schrieb krys...@ibse.cz: > I am sorry, it was little missleading - not that they can not support them, > but there is no official document that would state so. The only official > specsheet I saw that explicitely mentions ECC support is this one: >

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread Dan Ritter
krys...@ibse.cz wrote: > Dear Debian community, > we recently started using AMD Ryzen CPUs, ASRock Rack motherboards and > Kingston unbuffered ECC DIMMs for our small bussiness servers. All the > servers are running on ZFS for which ECC memory is recommended. So I naively >

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread krystof
DdB wrote: > Did you really read, that epycs cannot support ECC? > At least i can say, that my pools did not report any faults (which ofc > would be several layers above ecc) either in 3 years, which did help in > falling asleep. ;-) I am sorry, it was little missleading - not that they can not

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread gene heskett
On 2/20/23 13:12, John Hasler wrote: Tape the Americium-241 button out of a smoke detector to a RAM chip. Ooooh, that would be nasty ;o(> But it ought to do the trick. Cheers, Gene Heskett. -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread DdB
mended. So I naively > tried to test it actually works. I read EVERY disscussion on EVERY forum I > was able to find (and there is a lot of them, believe me), but I did not find > a satisfying answer. According to the legendary tweet from AMD (for which is > link in every discussion), the R

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread John Hasler
> Hi, thank you for the answer. Honestly it came to my mind I could make > some kind of neutrino emitter, since according to most articles it is > the main source of ECC errors, Neutrons, not neutrinos. The latter rarely interact with matter at all. A neutron source is fairly difficult to make.

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread John Hasler
Tape the Americium-241 button out of a smoke detector to a RAM chip. -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA

Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread krystof
Dear Debian community, we recently started using AMD Ryzen CPUs, ASRock Rack motherboards and Kingston unbuffered ECC DIMMs for our small bussiness servers. All the servers are running on ZFS for which ECC memory is recommended. So I naively tried to test it actually works. I read EVERY

Re: Just a test

2022-11-09 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Amn wrote on 09/11/2022 at 01:12:12+0100: > Please disregard this email. Alright, I'll disregard it. -- PEB signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Just a test

2022-11-08 Thread Jeremy Hendricks
I’m Jeremy, how are you? On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 7:27 PM Amn wrote: > Please disregard this email. > >

Just a test

2022-11-08 Thread Amn
Please disregard this email.

Test ML

2022-11-02 Thread ajh-valmer
Essai : désolé

debian-lists-test for your test posts, was Re: Which MTA for from-based smarthost selection, local delivery and queuing?

2022-09-08 Thread David Wright
On Thu 08 Sep 2022 at 10:54:20 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > Sorry, this is a test email. Not sure how to do it "off list" (more > explanation later, maybe) There's a very underpublicised list called debian-lists-test specially designed for such tests. Cheers, David.

test

2022-05-13 Thread steef
test (failure)

Re: test

2022-04-27 Thread antoine . valmer
On Wednesday 27 April 2022 08:54:52 Rémi Demarthe wrote: > Le lundi 25 avril 2022 à 19:01 +0200, awache...@gmail.com a écrit : > > On Monday 25 April 2022 17:56:36 Rémi Demarthe wrote: > > > Le lundi 25 avril 2022 à 11:13 +0200, ajh-valmer a écrit : > > Quel serveur de mails indique que mon mail

Re: test

2022-04-27 Thread Rémi Demarthe
Bonjour, Le lundi 25 avril 2022 à 19:01 +0200, awache...@gmail.com a écrit : > On Monday 25 April 2022 17:56:36 Rémi Demarthe wrote: > > Le lundi 25 avril 2022 à 11:13 +0200, ajh-valmer a écrit : > > > test ml > > > Chez moi sur evolution le message est considéré comme

Re: test

2022-04-25 Thread Romulus 1er
Test ok Le lun. 25 avr. 2022 à 19:27, a écrit : > On Monday 25 April 2022 17:56:36 Rémi Demarthe wrote: > > Le lundi 25 avril 2022 à 11:13 +0200, ajh-valmer a écrit : > > > test ml > > > Chez moi sur evolution le message est considéré comme spam. > > Dans l

Re: test

2022-04-25 Thread awache322
On Monday 25 April 2022 17:56:36 Rémi Demarthe wrote: > Le lundi 25 avril 2022 à 11:13 +0200, ajh-valmer a écrit : > > test ml > Chez moi sur evolution le message est considéré comme spam. > Dans les sources : > X-Spam-Flag: yes > X-Spam-Level: *** > X-GND

Re: test

2022-04-25 Thread Rémi Demarthe
Bonjour, Le lundi 25 avril 2022 à 11:13 +0200, ajh-valmer a écrit : > test ml > Chez moi sur evolution le message est considéré comme spam. Dans les sources : X-Spam-Flag: yes X-Spam-Level: *** X-GND-Spam-Score: 290 X-GND-Status: SPAM En espérant que cela puisse

Re: test

2022-04-25 Thread ajh . valmer
On Monday 25 April 2022 12:01:23 Fernand COSTA wrote: > vu ;) > Le 25/04/2022 à 11:13, ajh-valmer a écrit : > > test ml Merci. Malgré mon nouveau mail , (l'ancien posant problème) je ne reçois pas le mail que j'envoie à la ML Debian en retour.

Re: test

2022-04-25 Thread Fernand COSTA
vu ;) Le 25/04/2022 à 11:13, ajh-valmer a écrit : test ml

test

2022-04-25 Thread ajh-valmer
test ml

Re: Test unitaire de réseau

2022-02-07 Thread Olivier
r plusieurs machines, j'aimerai n'en utiliser qu'une > > seule (j'imagine qu'il est plus simple de lancer les tests et lire > > leurs résultats sur une seule machine), dotée de plusieurs interfaces > > réseau, et de lancer un script unique lançant chaque test unitaire > > mais s'il faut en utiliser plusieurs, j'en utiliserai plusieurs. > > > > Qui a déjà essayé un truc équivalent ? > > > > Slts > > >

Re: Test unitaire de réseau

2022-02-07 Thread Pierre Couderc
qu'il est plus simple de lancer les tests et lire leurs résultats sur une seule machine), dotée de plusieurs interfaces réseau, et de lancer un script unique lançant chaque test unitaire mais s'il faut en utiliser plusieurs, j'en utiliserai plusieurs. Qui a déjà essayé un truc équivalent ? Slts

Test unitaire de réseau

2022-02-07 Thread Olivier
chaque test unitaire mais s'il faut en utiliser plusieurs, j'en utiliserai plusieurs. Qui a déjà essayé un truc équivalent ? Slts

Re: how to test and compare performance of bullseye for i386 and amd64

2022-01-27 Thread a
Sorry, last word in last mail is wrong, it should be inconvenience, not  incontinence

Re: how to test and compare performance of bullseye for i386 and amd64

2022-01-26 Thread a
Thank David! my mail provider blocks your reply without informing me, so i can't receive it on time, i get your reply by some other way it's amazing that you get my history of getting help here, actually i've just bought 2nd-hand pc, it's core2 Q8200, 2.33G, it's my fastest pc though others

Re: how to test and compare performance of bullseye for i386 and amd64

2022-01-26 Thread a
Thank Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside! it's only for curiosity. for most users, their performance have little difference

Re: how to test and compare performance of bullseye for i386 and amd64

2022-01-26 Thread David Wright
On Wed 26 Jan 2022 at 05:44:50 (-0500), Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > On 2022-01-25 19:35, David Wright wrote: > > On Tue 25 Jan 2022 at 01:37:29 (-0500), a wrote: > >> Thank David and Polyna-Maude! > >> > >> it's surprising that "The x64 binary are also somewhat larger than the > >>

Re: how to test and compare performance of bullseye for i386 and amd64

2022-01-26 Thread Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
On 2022-01-25 19:35, David Wright wrote: > On Tue 25 Jan 2022 at 01:37:29 (-0500), a wrote: >> Thank David and Polyna-Maude! >> >> it's surprising that "The x64 binary are also somewhat larger than the >> i386 binaries" >> >> i compare some packages of bullseye for both arch, they happen to be

Re: how to test and compare performance of bullseye for i386 and amd64

2022-01-25 Thread David Wright
On Tue 25 Jan 2022 at 01:37:29 (-0500), a wrote: > Thank David and Polyna-Maude! > > it's surprising that "The x64 binary are also somewhat larger than the > i386 binaries" > > i compare some packages of bullseye for both arch, they happen to be > contrary > > though difference is small and IMO

Re: how to test and compare performance of bullseye for i386 and amd64

2022-01-25 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 03:29:17PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:18:55AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > it's surprising that "The x64 binary are also somewhat larger than the > > > i386 > > > binaries" > > > > There is no fundamental reason why a 64bit

Re: how to test and compare performance of bullseye for i386 and amd64

2022-01-25 Thread tomas
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:18:55AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > it's surprising that "The x64 binary are also somewhat larger than the i386 > > binaries" > > There is no fundamental reason why a 64bit architecture (like amd64) would > require more code than a 32bit architecture (like x86),

Re: how to test and compare performance of bullseye for i386 and amd64

2022-01-25 Thread Andy Smith
Hello, On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 08:30:20PM -0500, a wrote: > i've installed debian 11 for both arch on same PC, amd64 seems faster > > is there some tool to demonstrate performance of PC? Regardless of performance you should be more concerned that 32-bit x86 parts of the Linux kernel have more

Re: how to test and compare performance of bullseye for i386 and amd64

2022-01-24 Thread a
Thank David and Polyna-Maude! it's surprising that "The x64 binary are also somewhat larger than the i386 binaries" i compare some packages of bullseye for both arch, they happen to be contrary though difference is small and IMO has little impact on performance firefox-esr for i386: size=

Re: how to test and compare performance of bullseye for i386 and amd64

2022-01-24 Thread Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
On 2022-01-24 22:02, David Wright wrote: > On Mon 24 Jan 2022 at 20:30:20 (-0500), a wrote: >> i've installed debian 11 for both arch on same PC, amd64 seems faster >> >> is there some tool to demonstrate performance of PC? >> Yes there is standardized benchmark available. LinPack for example,

Re: how to test and compare performance of bullseye for i386 and amd64

2022-01-24 Thread David Wright
On Mon 24 Jan 2022 at 20:30:20 (-0500), a wrote: > i've installed debian 11 for both arch on same PC, amd64 seems faster > > is there some tool to demonstrate performance of PC? > > they say it's not possible to say which is faster without defining > computing task > > is performance difference

how to test and compare performance of bullseye for i386 and amd64

2022-01-24 Thread a
i've installed debian 11 for both arch on same PC, amd64 seems faster is there some tool to demonstrate performance of PC? they say it's not possible to say which is faster without defining computing task is performance difference significant if computing task is web browsing

Re: Please help to test latest Debian 11 release candidate on real hardware

2021-08-12 Thread Robbi Nespu
The data also on salsa now https://salsa.debian.org/linuxhw/TestCoverage/-/tree/main/Dist/Debian_11 -- Robbi Nespu D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA https://robbinespu.gitlab.io | https://mstdn.social/@robbinespu

Re: Please help to test latest Debian 11 release candidate on real hardware

2021-08-11 Thread Andrey Ponomarenko
> on 24 Jul 2021 16:27:23 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote > >> Why isn't this on Salsa instead of a Microsoft site? > > the package are dump and store at > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/hw-probe by debian package maintainer, > maybe the upstream author (Andrey Ponomarenko) want to centralize >

Re: test vs. [ [was: Bash script problem]

2021-08-05 Thread tomas
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 08:32:39AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 01:59:06PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 07:19:11AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > The external versions of test and [ need to exist for POSIX conformance,

Re: test vs. [ [was: Bash script problem]

2021-08-05 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 01:59:06PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 07:19:11AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > The external versions of test and [ need to exist for POSIX conformance, > > and also so that you can -exec them from find(1) or other similar >

test vs. [ [was: Bash script problem]

2021-08-05 Thread tomas
programs, for compat. There /is/ a /bin/test, but I can't > >find a /bin/[ on my system anymore. > > It's in /usr/bin on Debian. Ah, there it is, thanks. With all those young-uns shaking Unix's foundations, one never knows ;-P [...] > I'm a bit surprised they're not the

Re: Please help to test latest Debian 11 release candidate on real hardware

2021-07-29 Thread David Wright
On Thu 29 Jul 2021 at 12:54:14 (+0300), Anssi Saari wrote: > Andrey Ponomarenko writes: > > > LiveCDs for quick testing: > > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/ > > Well, are these images bootable via Grub directly and if so then what > parameters are needed?

Re: Please help to test latest Debian 11 release candidate on real hardware

2021-07-29 Thread Anssi Saari
Andrey Ponomarenko writes: > LiveCDs for quick testing: > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/ Well, are these images bootable via Grub directly and if so then what parameters are needed? Making testing easy eases testing...

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >