t Manager for Red Hat.
No, this is not necessarily a kernel bug. It can be a hardware bug and it
is plausible it can not be solved with a driver work-around.
You are hitting a problem and you want someone else to fix it for you. The
answer may simply be that you need to replace the NIC with somet
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 09:05:29AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > It has been known to happen that drivers implement workarounds for issues
> > in the hardware itself, so that hardware bugs do not get tripped (or are
> > tripped less often).
>
>
>
> You
> It has been known to happen that drivers implement workarounds for issues
> in the hardware itself, so that hardware bugs do not get tripped (or are
> tripped less often).
You make it sound like it's a rare occurrence, but it's actually
quite common. Most of it is discrete so you'
In days of yore (Tue, 16 Apr 2024), Sirius thus quoth:
> In days of yore (Mon, 15 Apr 2024), Jamie thus quoth:
> > So there is a very nasty bug in the e1000e network card
> > driver.
Doing some reading turned up a Proxmox thread about the issues with these
Intel NICs.
l page states this is upstream kernel only at this point, so going
to SourceForge for their out-of-tree driver is no longer an option.
> I am running Debian 12 Bookworm.
>
> You will get the message "Detected Hardware Unit Hang" and then
> the network card just stops working.
So there is a very nasty bug in the e1000e network card
driver.
I am running Debian 12 Bookworm.
You will get the message "Detected Hardware Unit Hang" and then
the network card just stops working.
This is a built in NIC on the computer
The computer is a is a HP Prodesk
El 2024-03-26 a las 16:23 +, Eduardo Jorge Gil Michelena escribió:
> Estimada gente:
> Disculpen el OT...
> ¿Conocen alguna lista de correos o foro web sobre Hardware?
¿De hardware en general o buscas algo más concreto?
> Antes había muchos pero ahora... parece que han desaparec
El 2024-03-26 a las 16:23 +, Eduardo Jorge Gil Michelena escribió:
> Estimada gente:
>
> Disculpen el OT...
> ¿Conocen alguna lista de correos o foro web sobre Hardware?
¿De hardware en general o buscas algo más concreto?
> Antes había muchos pero ahora... parece que han
Estimada gente:
Disculpen el OT...
¿Conocen alguna lista de correos o foro web sobre Hardware?
Antes había muchos pero ahora... parece que han desaparecido o por lo menos los
que yo conocía.
Y en la WEB... la información que suelo buscar seguramente debe estar pero...
con tanta página y sitio
Michael Kjörling composed on 2024-01-28 19:23 (UTC):
> On 28 Jan 2024 19:19 +0100, from h...@adminart.net (hw):
>> On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 15:56 +, Michael Kjörling wrote:
>>> It's also worth talking to your local electrician about installing an
>>> incoming-mains overvoltage protection for
On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 19:19:55 +0100
hw wrote:
Hello hw,
>How do you know in advance when the battery will have failed?
Even my very basic UPS (APC Backup 1400) has a light on the front
labelled "Replace Battery". That, combined with a very annoying high
pitch scream, are pretty good motivators
; years) every couple years [...]
>
> To comment myself, I think was 3 years, not 5, sorry.
>
>>> The hardware is usually extremely difficult --- and may be impossible
>>> --- to replace.
>>
>> And let's not forget that you can _plan_ to perform the battery
>> replaceme
On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 15:56 +, Michael Kjörling wrote:
> On 26 Jan 2024 16:11 +0100, from h...@adminart.net (hw):
> > I rather spend the money on new batteries (EUR 40 last time after 5
> > years) every couple years [...]
To comment myself, I think was 3 years, not 5, sorry.
&
On 26 Jan 2024 16:11 +0100, from h...@adminart.net (hw):
> I rather spend the money on new batteries (EUR 40 last time after 5
> years) every couple years [...]
>
> The hardware is usually extremely difficult --- and may be impossible
> --- to replace.
And let's not forget that
ks on
> the eevblog can get really deep into the weeds on subjects like this.
> If you are not careful, they might provide you with circuit designs
> and have you build your own hardware.
>
> Also see <https://www.eevblog.com/> and
> <https://www.google.com/search?q=to
areful, they might provide you with circuit designs
and have you build your own hardware.
Also see <https://www.eevblog.com/> and
<https://www.google.com/search?q=totp+hardware+site:eevblog.com>.
Jeff
Piotr writes:
> You could have contacted them to get a replacement, 100% faulty phone
> calls means Qualcomm modem was faulty. But I assume you contacted them
> and were unhappy with the result, hence your negative opinion on
> provided customer support, or lack thereof.
They were willing to sell
piorunz wrote:
> On 06/12/2023 07:45, Andre Rodier wrote:
> > If you also know a small phone supporting Debian, it could be fine
> > as well. **I don't need phone functions like, bluetooth, wifi,
> > etc.**
>
> Pinephone tick this box. It works quite well, for early development
> Linux phone.
have one) but a
hardware problem seems more likely. Inquiries on the forums produced no
results. I successfully installed Mobian but that did not help. Too
bad: it does everything I want except make phone calls.
Sad to hear. My copy worked, phone calls were great. You could have
contacted them
On 12/8/23 13:13, John Hasler wrote:
Too
bad: it does everything I want except make phone calls.
Phones now a days are not expected nor intended to make phone calls
--
It's not easy to be me
Some results of searches indicated that the card
might need to be activated on another phone (I didn't have one) but a
hardware problem seems more likely. Inquiries on the forums produced no
results. I successfully installed Mobian but that did not help. Too
bad: it does everything I want excep
On 08/12/2023 15:20, John Hasler wrote:
Piotr writes:
Pinephone tick this box. It works quite well, for early development
Linux phone.
No support when it doesn't, though.
Why you say so? What doesn't? It worked for me quite well, as a device
in early development. I really liked it. I passed
Piotr writes:
> Pinephone tick this box. It works quite well, for early development
> Linux phone.
No support when it doesn't, though.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 06/12/2023 07:45, Andre Rodier wrote:
If you also know a small phone supporting Debian, it could be fine as
well. **I don't need phone functions like, bluetooth, wifi, etc.**
Pinephone tick this box. It works quite well, for early development
Linux phone. Operating system you want is
screen is not needed.
- A num pad, with about two or three more keys.
- A small camera, to scan QR codes.
- An internal clock, with a DCF77 or similar device a nice plus.
I basically want to implement a hardware TOTP device, as none of them
are satisfactory to me.
Some looks nice, like ReinerSCTs
> Interesting. I have memtest86+ 6.10-4, for amd64, on the machine.
Then AFAIK it is not a known problem (IOW, it should work).
> Maybe I'll try a USB stick version.
IIRC the memtest86+ Debian package comes with .iso files which you can
(manually) put into /boot/images/ and which boot in a
On Sat, 02 Dec 2023 11:58:11 -0500
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Note: Memtest86 does not appear to work. I believe that is a known
> > problem with UEFI machines.
>
> AFAIK the current memtest86+ (not to be confused with memtest86, which
> is proprietary) claims to work fine on UEFI.
> IIUC the
d it to have
direct access to some of your hardware) but running it inside a VM
might save you a fair bit of trouble in the long run.
Stefan
> Note: Memtest86 does not appear to work. I believe that is a known
> problem with UEFI machines.
AFAIK the current memtest86+ (not to be confused with memtest86, which
is proprietary) claims to work fine on UEFI.
IIUC the one in oldstable doesn't OTOH.
Stefan
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:27:59 +0100
Arno Lehmann wrote:
>
> ... have you ever tried
>
> bcdedit /bootsequence
>
> In general, the built-in help of bcdedit is not bad, needs a bit of
> patience, though.
>
> And of course we lack the flexibility of tools such as awk or sed on
> Windows, to
it wrong deliberately.
Well...
... probably yes. But that's MS and their hardware partners for you.
It's getting better the more MS loses interest in actually selling Windows.
Cheers,
Arno
--
Arno Lehmann
IT-Service Lehmann
Sandstr. 6, 49080 Osnabrück
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 18:34:30 -0500
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> As I understand things, a well functioning UEFI system does not need
> to use GRUB. The entries for Linux and Windows will be in the UEFI
> boot menu, and you can boot directly using EFI variables.
>
It's the 'well functioning'
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 6:17 PM Charles Curley
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 15:57:28 -0700
> Charles Curley wrote:
>
> > My FIT-PCs that provide network services are getting old, and i386
> > Linux is slowly fading away. So I would like to replace them with a
> > router/gateway computer.
>
>
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 15:57:28 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> My FIT-PCs that provide network services are getting old, and i386
> Linux is slowly fading away. So I would like to replace them with a
> router/gateway computer.
Thank you all for much useful advice. I ended up with an ACEMAGIC T8
nt works finem its just that when Debian
drops support for the armel architecture I'm going to have to fork out
for new hardware, so am keeping my eye out for cheap options.
Another alternative is to just build armel myself. That might work for
the first release after the architecture is dropped,
On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 10:49 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >
>
> > I'm currently running a Globalscale SheevaPlug and a DreamPlugs but
> > Debian support for the old ARM architecture is likely to end soon.
> > (Dropping it seems to come up each release, but so far they're
> > still
> > releasing
boards are supported and if you look inside
that board's `.dts` file you can see which parts of its hardware are
actually supported by the vanilla kernel (tho this is not written in
natural language, so if you're not familiar with the technical details
of devicetree files it can be somewhat
oards are supported and if you look inside
that board's `.dts` file you can see which parts of its hardware are
actually supported by the vanilla kernel (tho this is not written in
natural language, so if you're not familiar with the technical details
of devicetree files it can be somewhat challengi
On 16/11/23 15:40, Tixy wrote:
On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 09:04 +0800, jeremy ardley wrote:
My current favourites are RK3588 based CPU SBC devices which have an
exceptionally fast set of CPUs, high speed networking, and options for
Debian or Ubuntu or OpenWRT or Armbian.
Are these the usual SBC
On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 09:04 +0800, jeremy ardley wrote:
> My current favourites are RK3588 based CPU SBC devices which have an
> exceptionally fast set of CPUs, high speed networking, and options for
> Debian or Ubuntu or OpenWRT or Armbian.
Are these the usual SBC setup where you have to run
On 16/11/23 10:15, Charles Curley wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 09:04:55 +0800
jeremy ardley wrote:
My current favourites are RK3588 based CPU SBC devices which have an
exceptionally fast set of CPUs, high speed networking, and options
for Debian or Ubuntu or OpenWRT or Armbian. They can
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 09:04:55 +0800
jeremy ardley wrote:
> My current favourites are RK3588 based CPU SBC devices which have an
> exceptionally fast set of CPUs, high speed networking, and options
> for Debian or Ubuntu or OpenWRT or Armbian. They can provide a
> network storage service as well
2.5Gb instead of 4; for a little more money you can get
up to 5x 2.5Gb NICs. You can add wifi via a miniPCIe slot; I didn't
bother. There are
The reality is that for a basic router function you don't need very much
hardware and certainly don't need fans. All the commercial Chinese
routers
On 11/15/23 18:37, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
On 16.11.2023 03:46, Charles Curley wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:58:05 +0500
"Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote:
16 years is a good amount of value. :)
Is it Pentium 4 on ITX motherboard?
Nope. FIT-PC, first iteration. Processor is an AMD Geode
On 16.11.2023 03:46, Charles Curley wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:58:05 +0500
"Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote:
16 years is a good amount of value. :)
Is it Pentium 4 on ITX motherboard?
Nope. FIT-PC, first iteration. Processor is an AMD Geode SBC.
https://linux-hardware.org/?probe=c256a73072
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:58:05 +0500
"Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote:
> 16 years is a good amount of value. :)
> Is it Pentium 4 on ITX motherboard?
Nope. FIT-PC, first iteration. Processor is an AMD Geode SBC.
https://linux-hardware.org/?probe=c256a73072
I did buy a spare hard drive for each,
program.)
None of my personal machines either. It all depends on specifications
for each individual piece of hardware.
My desktop has Skylake CPU rated at 65W Base TDP and cooled by
tower-style heatsink with 4 heatpipes rated at 130W TDP.
Idle, small load temps are 28-32°C, busy workloads: 4 cor
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 12:31:52 +0500
"Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote:
> On 15.11.2023 07:56, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> [...]
> [...]
> I wrote that email as a word of caution, because Roberto had
> mentioned he is looking for the device with the same conditions as
> OP, which is "no fans".
>
On 15.11.2023 07:56, Stefan Monnier wrote:
This looks too good to be true and raises many red flags.
According to Intel specs [1] for this processor it's 28W of heat to
dissipate and that is Base Power only, Turbo Boost is whooping 64W(!).
IMO it is impossible to do with fan-less design at
> This looks too good to be true and raises many red flags.
> According to Intel specs [1] for this processor it's 28W of heat to
> dissipate and that is Base Power only, Turbo Boost is whooping 64W(!).
> IMO it is impossible to do with fan-less design at this small size, so there
> will be at
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 03:57:28PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> > My FIT-PCs that provide network services are getting old, and i386
> > Linux is slowly fading away. So I would like to replace them with a
> > router/gateway computer.
> >
> > It should run Debian.
>
On 14.11.23 10:45, Anssi Saari wrote:
Charles Curley writes:
My FIT-PCs that provide network services are getting old, and i386
Linux is slowly fading away. So I would like to replace them with a
router/gateway computer.
I built a router with an APUD4D board and case from
pcengines.ch.
Charles Curley writes:
> My FIT-PCs that provide network services are getting old, and i386
> Linux is slowly fading away. So I would like to replace them with a
> router/gateway computer.
I built a router with an APUD4D board and case from
pcengines.ch. They're going out of production but are
On 14.11.2023 04:08, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 03:57:28PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
My FIT-PCs that provide network services are getting old, and i386
Linux is slowly fading away. So I would like to replace them with a
router/gateway computer.
It should run Debian.
Charles Curley wrote:
> It should run Debian.
>
> It should either have two gigabit (or better) Ethernet interfaces or
> have suitable expansion capability.
>
> It should be quiet: no fans, and low power requirements. A small
> physical footprint would be nice.
>
> Most of the time it will run
ough the FIT-PCs do fine with IDE
> spinning rust.
It sounds like you want an all-in-one of sorts. Something with
hardware+software. I don't have a recommendation for that.
However, if you would like a piece of hardware that checks most of the
boxes and can run whatever you like, then I rec
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 03:57:28PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> My FIT-PCs that provide network services are getting old, and i386
> Linux is slowly fading away. So I would like to replace them with a
> router/gateway computer.
>
> It should run Debian.
>
> It should either have two gigabit
On 14/11/23 06:57, Charles Curley wrote:
My FIT-PCs that provide network services are getting old, and i386
Linux is slowly fading away. So I would like to replace them with a
router/gateway computer. It should run Debian. It should either have
two gigabit (or better) Ethernet interfaces or
My FIT-PCs that provide network services are getting old, and i386
Linux is slowly fading away. So I would like to replace them with a
router/gateway computer.
It should run Debian.
It should either have two gigabit (or better) Ethernet interfaces or
have suitable expansion capability.
It
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 7:48 AM Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> >> Indeed, technically-inclined people are often better served with Free
> >> Software, and Free Software can also be a great choice for large
> >> corporations who can either have on-site techsupport people or can hire
> >> external
Anssi Saari [2023-11-13 12:34:13] wrote:
> Stefan Monnier writes:
>> My home NAS is in a completely different category:
>> an ARM SBC with on-board SATA. Much smaller, extremely quiet (no fan),
>> and between 5W and 10W of power consumption depending on whether it's
>> mostly idle (the
>> Indeed, technically-inclined people are often better served with Free
>> Software, and Free Software can also be a great choice for large
>> corporations who can either have on-site techsupport people or can hire
>> external support, but it is a lot more difficult to find commercial
>> support
Stefan Monnier writes:
> My home NAS is in a completely different category:
> an ARM SBC with on-board SATA. Much smaller, extremely quiet (no fan),
> and between 5W and 10W of power consumption depending on whether it's
> mostly idle (the overwhelmingly common case) or not.
So which ARM SBC
urse, easier in densely populated areas.
In Berlin, e.g., there were several linux user groups which had
"open days" (some even once a week) where people went with their
hardware and got it fixed. And got to know nice people. Often
at no cost.
In the smaller city I live now there is at le
> FOSS is great for learning by doing, but commercial products can be a better
> choice when a family member, a friend, a neighbor, and especially clients
> and employers, want a computer, a server, a network gateway, etc.. It is
> ironically satisfying when those commercial products have FOSS on
On 11/12/23 09:15, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 04:01:47PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
An obvious difference between internal and external drives is physical
protection. Internal drives and cables are protected. Everything gets
power from the same source (PSU, PCU fed
that he's
been trying for literal years now to make a very simple RAID10
mdadm work on perfectly serviceable hardware. This should be a
simple task, but it's not gone well for him and this list is
unable to get to the bottom of why (I include myself in that, but
I think it ref
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 04:01:47PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> On 11/11/23 08:52, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 10:22:07PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> > > On 11/10/23 19:46, David Christensen wrote:
> > > > On 11/8/23 02:20, gene heskett wrote:
> >
> > Are these 2TB
s use case, the practical situation for Gene is that he's
been trying for literal years now to make a very simple RAID10
mdadm work on perfectly serviceable hardware. This should be a
simple task, but it's not gone well for him and this list is
unable to get to the bottom of why (I include mysel
> I have always liked ATX tower cases with lots of drive bays, both internal
> and external. Over time, more products have become available with good
> cooling and low noise. I have not found a major computer manufacturer who
> makes servers with all of those features, so I build my own:
>
> *
On 11/11/23 08:52, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 10:22:07PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
On 11/10/23 19:46, David Christensen wrote:
On 11/8/23 02:20, gene heskett wrote:
And I just looked at tht pair, and acc gparted they have both been
pvcreated, so I'll leave then alone
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >From what I've read when comparing OpenMediaVault vs TrueNAS, it
> usually comes down to the power consumption of the mini computer/mini
> pc. 5W can save you $100 USD per year. Probably more now due to
> inflation.
5W * 24h/D * 30 D/M * 12M/Y = 43200 Wh, or 43.2KWh per
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 6:20 PM Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > >From what I've read when comparing OpenMediaVault vs TrueNAS, it
> > usually comes down to the power consumption of the mini computer/mini
> > pc. 5W can save you $100 USD per year. Probably more now due to
> >
On 11/11/23 15:41, Pocket wrote:
On 11/11/23 13:47, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I have used ssd drives connected to a RPI4 ever since the 4 came out,
zero issues.
The RPI4's boot from the ssd drives.
I have 4 SSD drives connected to a single RPI4 currently, using a
powered
USB hub.
Hmm... so
o standup a NAS for my home network.
(Currently I'm doing some half-ass file sharing). The enclosure
hardware on the short list are <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08CN4Z4PC/>
and <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07Y3WDHLD>. The mini computer the
enclosure will be attached to will be USB 3.1 o
On 11/11/23 13:47, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I have used ssd drives connected to a RPI4 ever since the 4 came out,
zero issues.
The RPI4's boot from the ssd drives.
I have 4 SSD drives connected to a single RPI4 currently, using a powered
USB hub.
Hmm... so maybe the USB connection is not
> I have used ssd drives connected to a RPI4 ever since the 4 came out,
> zero issues.
> The RPI4's boot from the ssd drives.
> I have 4 SSD drives connected to a single RPI4 currently, using a powered
> USB hub.
Hmm... so maybe the USB connection is not directly relevant either and
the real
On 11/11/23 12:05, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Are these 2TB SSDs or hard disks? I would counsel very strongly indeed
against using any ARM-based single board computer as a RAID device on
USB connections - they're just *not* up to it.
I don't think the issue is whether they're ARM based.
The issue
just my two sense
not advice or promotion
i've used this device for about 2.5 years with 6tb harddrives in raid 1
i have partitions on the raid for the os, debian, and the rest for backups
no problems so far
https://ameridroid.com/products/odroid-hc4
> Are these 2TB SSDs or hard disks? I would counsel very strongly indeed
> against using any ARM-based single board computer as a RAID device on
> USB connections - they're just *not* up to it.
I don't think the issue is whether they're ARM based.
The issue is simply how you connect the disks:
Does anyone here have experience doing that?
> >
> >
> > Yes, but I prefer software RAID -- because I can move the disks to
> > another computer with different hardware and the arrays will still work.
> > Hardware RAID typically requires compatible hardware.
> >
n M1-chip 2020 MacBook Air on which I have dual-booted with
>>> Debian 12 initially, then "upgraded" to sid (in hopes of getting better
>>> hardware support). It has several hardware ... glitches, and my google-fu
>>> is failing me in finding solutions. I'm hoping someone her
graded" to sid (in hopes of getting better
>> hardware support). It has several hardware ... glitches, and my google-fu
>> is failing me in finding solutions. I'm hoping someone here can help.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Have you considered just running Debian
wrote:
> > I have an M1-chip 2020 MacBook Air on which I have dual-booted with
> > Debian 12 initially, then "upgraded" to sid (in hopes of getting
> > better hardware support).
>
>
> Out of curiosity, does Debian 12 support the M1 NPU (Neu
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 11:31 PM Kent West wrote:
> I have an M1-chip 2020 MacBook Air on which I have dual-booted with Debian
> 12 initially, then "upgraded" to sid (in hopes of getting better hardware
> support). It has several hardware ... glitches, and my google-fu is fail
On 10/11/23 04:44, Kent West wrote:
I have an M1-chip 2020 MacBook Air on which I have dual-booted with
Debian 12 initially, then "upgraded" to sid (in hopes of getting
better hardware support).
Out of curiosity, does Debian 12 support the M1 NPU (Neural Processing
Unit) ?
Am 09.11.2023 um 14:44:20 Uhr schrieb Kent West:
> Not even from "speaker-test" after I've killed X/Wayland/gdm3, although
> "speaker-test" (as a non-root user) looks like it's working. It acts
> like the speakers are muted, but I can find no way to unmute them.
> When I run "speaker-test" as
I have an M1-chip 2020 MacBook Air on which I have dual-booted with Debian
12 initially, then "upgraded" to sid (in hopes of getting better hardware
support). It has several hardware ... glitches, and my google-fu is failing
me in finding solutions. I'm hoping someone here can he
I have a Desktop PC running Debian 11.
A few days ago I found the following error messages on an xterm window
running in the background :-
Message from syslogd@piglit at Sep 28 09:44:25 ...
kernel:[51369.604961] [Hardware Error]: Deferred error, no action
required.
Message from syslogd@piglit
On 2023-10-03 02:43 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
> I recently installed Debian stable on my old desktop and my trusty old
> Thinkpad X200, without messing with any driver settings. Both are
> running the default gnome desktop with the same kernel.
>
> I installed the terminal emulator 'kitty'
I recently installed Debian stable on my old desktop and my trusty old
Thinkpad X200, without messing with any driver settings. Both are
running the default gnome desktop with the same kernel.
I installed the terminal emulator 'kitty' from the main repository on
both machines but it only works on
ce (12023-06-08):
> What about ads for car insurance?
Yes, what about them? What do you think they have special?
(Hint: an ad for a car insurance is not to convince you to subscribe to
any insurance rather than none, it is to convince you to subscribe to
this insurance rather than any other.)
On 6/8/23 01:34, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Ad industry /is/ about convincing people to do things which
potentially damage them. So it is deceptive by design. Read up on Big
Tobacco for a good example.
What about ads for car insurance?
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 12:45:38AM +0200, Oliver Schoede wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 06:05:18 +0200
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 05:59:11PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >> The only case I can see in which such offloading would
> >> be unethical is where the website
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 06:05:18 +0200
wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 05:59:11PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>> The only case I can see in which such offloading would
>> be unethical is where the website operator is somehow engaging in
>> deceptive behavior, but assuming it is not [...]
>
>A
On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 05:59:11PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
[...]
> The only case I can see in which such offloading would
> be unethical is where the website operator is somehow engaging in
> deceptive behavior, but assuming it is not [...]
A pretty strong assumption given that the crushing
On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 16:17:47 +0800
Bret Busby wrote:
> On 4/6/23 14:32, Max Nikulin wrote:
>
> >
> > I believe, web site creators should be blamed more aggressively than
> > browser developers for RAM requirements of contemporary web applications.
> >
>
> That was the point that I was making
> With no client-side javascript, it's not possible to change just a part of
> a web page[0]. The server must send the whole web page to be rendered by the
> client. So while it decreases CPU usage in the client, it increases network
> usage. Isn't it unethical to also "steal" more bandwidth than
On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 10:34:04AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 04:30:46PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > So the practice is that the whole internet dumps the whole framework
> > schtack [2] on you.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebAssembly
We need better
On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 04:30:46PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> So the practice is that the whole internet dumps the whole framework
> schtack [2] on you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebAssembly
1 - 100 of 5220 matches
Mail list logo
