If you don't mind, is this report 1.05b something that I could download
(i.e. declude website). If so, what is the name of this reporting tool?
Thank you,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 1:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Believe I found it, called DeLog by Image'fx Thanks for the aid.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Shared Kill File Stats
If you don't mind, is this report 1.05b something that I
Hi Scott,
Is there a digest mode for both your lists??
Tks,
Mike
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an
Is there a digest mode for both your lists??
Yes -- you can use the standard IMail command for that (which takes some
hunting to find!). You can send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
set mode digest declude.virus or set mode digest declude.junkmail, and
you will get switched to the
Hi all,
Since we're bragging about our killfie usage...
Sunday was a bit slow, we've been averaging 55,000 messages per day
since the beginning of December.
Declude Log file information:
---
Total amount of unique messages found in log: 36292
Wow Fritz that's impressive! Good job and Tom thanks for the info on
the upgrade.
-Don S
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Frederick P.
Squib, Jr.
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 9:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
Tom,
You are awesome, thanks for such great tools and support.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Juliano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 12:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Shared Kill File Stats
If you don't mind, is
Believe I found it, called DeLog by Image'fx
This program will not generate those stats, it will,
however, analyze the Declude log file and it's free.
You can find this program using the following link:
http://www.imagefxonline.net/apps/delog
Regards,
Tom
Image`fx
---
[This E-mail was scanned
Is there a limit to the number of filters or other tests, whether in terms
of actual, theoretical or performance wise?
Right now, it is hard-coded to 256; we plan to make it unlimited soon.
Is there any difference with having one compared to say 5?
grayfilter1 Free e-mail
What does it mean when mail is caught (i.e.: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) but
Spam
Review shows no warnings or explanations unlike other emails with a
paragraph of why the mail failed?
It could have been caught by a test that you do not have set to WARN.
The headers and a log snippet would help us to
Scott, what is hard coded to 256? My single filter list has over 2400
entries in it and it flags entries in the 2000 range all of the time, and
seems to be working great.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:01 AM
To:
Scott, what is hard coded to 256?
Sorry, I should have explained.
There is a hard-coded limit on the number of tests that are defined, so you
can't have more than 256 tests defined. Each filter test that you create
(that has a unique name shown in the global.cfg file) counts as only one
Gotcha, thanks for the clarification.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Limit on number of filters (Or tests)
Scott, what is hard coded to 256?
Sorry, I
Does t_key: still need to be defined, as it says on the web site -
otherwise it runs in demo mode?
Monday, December 16, 2002, 11:38:07 AM, Thomas Juliano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you don't mind, is this report 1.05b something that I
could download i.e. declude website). If so, what is
A lot of our customers seem to want a web interface to Declude JunkMail,
mostly so that customers can turn their spam settings on or off.
We haven't come up with something in the past, because it is very
complicated without a hook into web messaging, and it doesn't look like
Ipswitch is
Does t_key: still need to be defined, as it says on the web site -
otherwise it runs in demo mode?
You can leave it out if you wish.
Regards,
Tom
Image`fx
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
If I could give users granular control over their own spam settings, that would get me
off the hook for doing it for them.
What you're describing, though, sounds almighty complex. On the surface (admittedly
:D) It would be fairly straightforward to write in ColdFusion, if all we're talking
Scott, I think that this would be a great addon to JunkMail. A very small
percentage of our user even use web messaging (possibly because they don't
know it's available--we don't currently advertise it), so it would not be a
burden to most of our customers. Also, once you bookmark the link, it
Is this something that is important enough that it would be
worthwhile?
I don't think it's worth the effort technically, though it may well be
so in a financial sense.
Nobody seems to have acknowledged my message about REDIRECTing to
PLAN.IMA for per-user actions, but I am
Several contributors to this list have talked about or have shown
preliminary tools. We started working on something as well a few wekks ago
as well. It might be worthwhile to pool the work already begun or take
something that has a promissing start.
David
Is this something that is
Admittedly, we're a small ISP and may not be representative of the entire
group, but I'm not convinced we would even use such a product.
Every so often I feel as though I'm a censor and I get an uneasy feeling.
If we allow individuals to control their own destiny with antispam
parameters,
Admittedly, we're a small ISP and may not be representative of the
entire group, but I'm not convinced we would even use such a
product.
Okay, makes sense. Many admins would quite sensibly not want to
surrender control, and server resources, to a chaotic--not to say
Scott,
I've spent thousands of hours (as many of us have) perfecting a universally applicable
configuration (as diverse as my client base allows).
On the server side, when there's a flaw in the system revealed by an FP, changing the
entire system means all other clients benefit from the
Scott,
I vote yes. Our users would love it! If you or another does not create
it - we would eventually work on something for our customers based on
repeat requests. It's either I pay my guys, another, or you.
Several months ago another Decluder here shared files they developed of
end user filter
I agree with what you are saying and especially no need for GUI for
Declude administrator. Not sure I read Scott's original post correctly?
I was thinking he meant end user on/off/select/remove filters tool.
Filters set-up, defined, and made available for selection by the Declude
administrator.
Absolutely!
Given the already vocal comments on this list, here's my few cents worth:
The lack of a web-based GUI is probably the one main feature that keeps some of your
competitors in business.
Given the relatively low-cost of Declude, even the Pro version compared with the
multi-thousand
Nobody seems to have acknowledged my message about REDIRECTing to
PLAN.IMA for per-user actions, but I am using the method with great
success to provide user self-management from *within* IMail Web
Messaging. If I, no JavaScript guru, can do it, surely others could go
this or
27 matches
Mail list logo
