Keith,
I have a beta available and I am looking for individuals to test it out.
If you are interested the beta will be made available as early as
Monday.
Please let me know if you are interested.
Darrell LaRock
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Darrell,
Totally interested. You can hit me with the beta off list if
you'd like. Email is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks again for writing it and
providing out to this forum.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Darrell L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003
I have a beta available and I am looking for individuals to test it out.
If you are interested the beta will be made available as early as
Monday.
I would be interested.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
Yes, me too please.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
Sent: Friday, 28 February 2003 9:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Analyzer - Comments Needed
I have a beta available and I am looking for
I would love it too. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell L.
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Analyzer - Comments Needed
Keith,
I have a beta
Is it possible to tell Hijack to not store messages from certain IPs
Yes. You can use the ALLOWIP option to do that. For example, if you add
the following line to the \IMail\Declude\hijack.cfg file:
ALLOWIP 192.0.2.25
then Declude Hijack will allow unlimited E-mail from 192.0.2.25.
Scott,
What information / location in the e-mail headers does Declude use for the
REVDNS test.
Does Declude use the DNS server in the global.cfg file to make the query ?
Thanks
Stu
-
CSOnline Technical Support hours -
Count me in : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Shacklett
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Analyzer - Comments Needed
Yes, me too please.
Me too!!! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:28 AM 2/28/2003, you wrote:
Count me in : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of John Shacklett
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
What information / location in the e-mail headers does Declude use for the
REVDNS test.
It uses the appropriate Received: header (based on your settings in the
\IMail\Declude\global.cfg file). By default, it will use the IP from the
first Received: header. However, by using the IPBYPASS/HOP
Hello, All,
I am pushing hard to learn as much about Declude.JunkMail as my time allows
during the trial period. I think I installed on February 11th so I'm about
17 days into the trial.
I was hoping to get some feedback from the list as far as things I might
have looked over and might want to
Could someone pleaase :) help me out, my declude mail and virus
config setup is soo old, ( been so busy you know...). it needs updating
real bad, could someone help me update my config files and settings to the
latest configurations too much stuff getting thru especially adult
In my experience SPAMCOP has been very good at weeding out SPAM and we
hold/block using this test alone. We do occasionally get a false
positive or two, but no more or less than any of RBL's that list known
open relays.
Darrell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
In our experience as an ISP, this was our INITIAL reaction (based on my
personal mailbox),
However SPAMCOP turned into about 50% accuracy system wide, and we had to
move to at least 2 RBL tests failed to hold, or SNIFFER.
It would be a good idea to run the sniffer
Hello, All,
I have a question concerning the best way to go about filtering out a
specific e-mail message. For an overview of the current state of our spam
filtering setup please see an e-mail I just sent to the list with the
subject Where I'm At Now and Where Should I Be Going?.
OK, below I
Speaking of SPAMCOP, one option would be to increase the weight that that test
applies. Then you will block mail that fails that test and another, but pass mail
that fails only that test.
YMMV
__
David Fletcher
InfoTech International, LLC.
Title: Message
Hello, All,
Just trying to expand my own internal
KnowledgeBase.
In the below message, what exactly is a "filter
file"? Is it a feature of Declude or a different 3rd-party add-on?
If it's part of Declude is there somewhere in the documentation where I can read
more about it?
I
would love to use this as well.
Darryl
Koster~~Status
Technologies
Inc.
President/Owner"Let Us Help You Get The Status You Deserve!"http://www.statustechnologies.comP:
(905) 435-0145 TF (NA) 888-909-9004 F: (905)
435-0873
Hello, Brian,
Is there a link on the web somewhere to CYBERsitter SpamManager? I can't
seem to find it. Also,would you consider this product a competing product
to Declude.JunkMail?
Thanks,
Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Brian Milburn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
OK, below I have included the headers for an e-mail that one of my users
forwarded to me. I have removed the username...
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 28 00:58:23 2003
This is one option that you can filter on -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is the return address of the E-mail. The advantage of
In the below message, what exactly is a filter file? Is it a feature of
Declude or a different 3rd-party add-on? If it's part of Declude is there
somewhere in the documentation where I can read more about it? Is
filter a type of test like fromfile?
A filter file is just the file that is
I agree as an ISP that SPAMCOP alone does not work, but as a corporate
email, it might be considerably different, positive or negative.
Another test you might consider is SpamChk, I just started using it and
it makes a huge difference in my mail box, I do need to tune it though,
it trapps my Daily
You can find it on the Tools page at www.declude.com.
BTW, Scott, I know there are other add-ons out there that are not on
your tools list, if it is not your intention to maintain a comprehensive
list then maybe someone else might want to put one together. It would
be nice to know all the
Quick question,
the list of spam address's at
http://www.imagefxonline.net/apps/delog/fromfile.txt
have an id number at the end of them. Will this affect the kill list by
leaving them in?
Darryl Koster
~~
Status Technologies Inc.
It seems that SPAMCOP goes through cycles. Right now, I have not heard many
complaints lately. But about 4 months ago, I had to lower its weight from
hold to major test.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
Could someone pleaase :) help me out, my declude mail and virus
config setup is soo old, ( been so busy you know...). it needs updating
real bad, could someone help me update my config files and settings to the
latest configurations too much stuff getting thru especially adult
We would like to announce the release of LogTool for Declude JunkMail. This
application was designed from the ground up to allow the user to quickly and easily
drill-down into JunkMail's logs to assist in the fine-tuning of the filters.
In a near future release, we will expand LogTool's
Darrell,
I'll be glad to have a look at that too. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Maybe it would be easier to post it to a site so we can download it from
there and save you time.
Paul
Keith,
I have a beta available and I am looking for individuals to
test it out. If you are interested the beta
www.spammanager.com
There is a version that is intended to work closely with Declude that some
of us including myself beta tested and helped worked out the bugs.
There is also a standalone version to work directly with Imail.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft,
Dan,
In a perfect BOFH world, I would just block 211.0.0.0/8 :D But, I'd say
the best way to filter out that subject line would be just by using the
the Imail filters. It's very unlikely that a legit message would ever
use that *exact* subject, so I think you'd be okay.
Koree
Dan Geiser
I see you updated it recently, I was killing myself yesterday to
remember the name of Spammanager, had to search the archives. Also,
could you include a link to my add-ons site
http://spamreview.argolink.net/software, I have several tools there, one
is the zipfile for the Hijack notifier. As I
Dan,
I have several tests I made myself, which if I wanted to, could drop to
2 or 3, however, here is what I would do. FWIW - I'm by no means an expert
here, trial and error gets you through it.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [211.241.219.3]
This line is your best friend! well, I
The address is http://www.spammanager.com
It might be a competing product for Declude, but it is not intended to be. It
is a different approach however it also supports being used as a Declude test.
Imail is not really our intended market, however since we use IMail ourselves,
it was a natural
I see you updated it recently
:)
Also, could you include a link to my add-ons site
http://spamreview.argolink.net/software, I have several tools there, one
is the zipfile for the Hijack notifier.
It's set up now with one link to each tool, I hope that isn't a problem (it
should be easier for
Same here, I would be interested.
Jeff Kratka
*
TymeWyse Internet
P.O.Box 84 - 583 N. Main St., Canyonville, OR 97417
tel/fax: (541) 839-6027 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
-Original
Dear, Scott, et. al.
Thank you very much for all of the recommendations. It is definitely my
itent to learn how to do all of the possible techniques that people
suggested when responding to my original e-mail, eventually. But for the
time being I think I'll try the block the E-mail based on the
Thank you, it is a nice way to see how the filters are doing, and it
keeps the data set small, all 28 of my tests take up less than a meg to
store (rrd's are created at their final size).
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
The primary other option is to block the E-mail based on the IP address
(211.241.219.3, from the top Received: header)
Am I correct that the setup for this option is outlined in the section
labeled Your own IP blacklists in the Declude JunkMail manual?
That is correct.
I would be interested. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Horne, CCNA
Systems Administrator
TAIS Web
Wilcox World Travel Tours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended
I would love to try it out as well!!
Sounds very usefull.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell L.
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 6:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Analyzer - Comments
I am finding that not all the headers are being inserted when the message is
from an Internet domain and going to a gateway domain.
These are the headers that are being added:
XINHEADER X-RBL-Warning: Total weight: %WEIGHT%
XSENDER ON
XSPOOLNAME ON
XINHEADER
I am finding that not all the headers are being inserted when the message is
from an Internet domain and going to a gateway domain.
That's normal.
If the E-mail is not destined to an account on the IMail server, it is
considered outgoing E-mail, so:
XINHEADER X-RBL-Warning: Total weight:
Pardon me going off topic, but we've exhausted our normal diagnostics on this Outlook
problem. I
have two users (software developers) who both run Windows/Office 2000 and started
having email
trouble today. It doesn't send or receive, acts very sluggish, and when they check the
Task Manager
an
I know this sounds elementary but you yourself might want to make sure that
Real-time File protection is enabled on their system and do a full manual
scan.
Googling for MAPISP32 and CPU turns up some interesting hits.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Keith,
Did you check Google Groups? There looks to be tons of stuff discussing
similar issues in there.
Some sample subjects include...
OL2000/MAPISP32 livelock state (NOT COVERED BY Q195922)
mail problem mapisp32.exe using 99% CPU
MAPISP32 uses 100% CPU
etc...
Just a thought.
Take Care,
Dan
Indeed, Google does have information. I've got expand my search engine horizons beyond
Alta Vista!
(P.S. We've got RealTime enabled and tried manual scan.)
Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator
VantageMed Operations (Kansas City)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email
Hello, All,
We've been running Declude.JunkMail in filtering (HOLD action) mode for
about a week now.
I think the powers that be are interested in seeing some real, concrete
numbers regarding what sort of benefit Declude.JunkMail has been brining to
our mail server lo these last 7 days. I am not
Hi, Again,
I was asked me an interesting question today which I did not have an answer
for so I thought I would find out. Currently we hold all suspected spam
but somewhere down the road we might be interested in rejecting the spam for
even being received by our mail server.
One JunkMail action
When the bounce action is flipped on, if a message fails a test with
bounce associated with it does Declude.JunkMail tell IMail to reject the
message during the incoming SMTP conversation (and not even accept it into
the server) or does IMail actually accept the message and then queue the
bounce
Delog is good, there is a thread about a beta log analyzer Log Analyzer
- Comments Needed, sounds real promising. You might check those out. I
seem to remember there being others, but can't think of them off hand.
The only other one is Netcomm LogTool, but I don't think you want to
spend $200
Quick question,
the list of spam address's at
http://www.imagefxonline.net/apps/delog/fromfile.txt
have an id number at the end of them. Will this affect the kill list by
leaving them in?
No these are allowed with Declude and are no more than a comment.
The comments, however, have a
Hello, Greg,
Does Log Tool have a trial version that I can
try?
Thanks, Much!
Dan
- Original Message -
From:
Greg Bourland
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 5:27
PM
Subject: h:Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Declude.JunkMail Statistics
Check
Yes it will by setting it up per the Declude configuration in the
documentation.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks John!
~Patrick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Tolmachoff
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 7:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: DSN:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitlist Compiler
Yes it will by setting it up per
If any one needs the exact Declude tests definitions let me know.
(Although I may not be able to get it to you until Tuesday.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
SpamManager returns negative results for adult and positive results for spam.
John has some good test definitions that I am sure he will share.
On 02/28/03 7:41pm you wrote...
There is a Declude specific version of SpamManager now
available that does not have all the bells and whistles and
In a corporate setting a company may or may not have an
Internet/email/conduct policy. If not, it may be very dificult to fire
someone for conduct that they didn't agree to abide by and if it came to
a lawsuit they would probably loose.
In fact, in TN, a long-haul trucker won a worker's comp
I can't believe you guys are agonizing over this ethical dilema. it
redicuolus... have you been so jaded by popular opinion of what is right
or wrong that you let $$$ signs dictate what is right and wrong?
Poronography and all the sick things that go with it ( i don't think i have
to elaborate
58 matches
Mail list logo
