FYI Spamdomians failed this. Which it
should have based on my SP entry ofcom.although it was a valid
email. Its an invoice sent by someone to my client though intuits online
invoicing system.
What is everyone using for "com."
Received: from mail2.smart-mail.net [65.16.167.134]
by
asn't mean for
that...
Jason
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Todd - Smart MailSent: Friday, August 01, 2003
6:45 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains com.
FYI Spamdomians failed t
Title: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] dashes in domains
Question on SpamDomains...
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'netscape.' found: Address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from invalid
r2d2.aoltw.net
The above header was in an email to me from a netscape employee I work
with. (changed it to
Title: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] dashes in domains
Joshua,
What about...
netscape. .aol
?
Dan
- Original Message -
From:
Joshua
Levitsky
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 6:26
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains
question
Title: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] dashes in domains
Oh that is smart... cool... I think that will do it
for me.
-Josh
- Original Message -
From:
Dan
Geiser
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 6:42
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Spamdomains
Hello, All,
Since the SPAMDOMAINS test only has 2 possible columns one for the domain
name and one for a possible alias...
When using the SPAMDOMAINS test, if you have a legit sender that has three
interchangeable domains in use on their mail servers, e.g. HOTMAIL.COM,
MICROSOFT.COM and MSN.COM
Since the SPAMDOMAINS test only has 2 possible columns one for the domain
name and one for a possible alias...
When using the SPAMDOMAINS test, if you have a legit sender that has three
interchangeable domains in use on their mail servers, e.g. HOTMAIL.COM,
MICROSOFT.COM and MSN.COM (this is just
Hello, All,
If I am using the SPAMDOMAINS test what happens when it does a reverse DNS
lookup and it times out? Does the e-mail message pass or fail the
SPAMDOMAINS test?
Also, what happens when it does a reverse DNS lookup and there is no reverse
DNS entry? Is that even possible for it to not
If I am using the SPAMDOMAINS test what happens when it does a reverse DNS
lookup and it times out? Does the e-mail message pass or fail the
SPAMDOMAINS test?
It will automatically pass the SPAMDOMAINS test.
Also, what happens when it does a reverse DNS lookup and there is no reverse
DNS entry?
Scott
I had this mail fail both SPAMDOMAINS and HELOBOGUS. The message is an
OK message the syslog shows the message actually arriving from a hotmail
server. Should this not have been OK or do I have something wrong?
Received: from hotmail.com [65.54.169.8] by mx2.netraprise.com with
ESMTP
I had this mail fail both SPAMDOMAINS and HELOBOGUS. The message is an
OK message the syslog shows the message actually arriving from a hotmail
server. Should this not have been OK or do I have something wrong?
The problem here is with your HOP/IPBYPASS settings:
Received: from hotmail.com
Yes indeed. Just changed it. All fixed.
The problem here is with your HOP/IPBYPASS settings:
Thanks
David Stavert
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an
Any chance that SPAMDOMAINS can have three entries. MSN uses Qwest DSL
in my neighbourhood.
Is there another way to handle this?
That's something that we are looking into.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
I just implemented the SPAMDOMAINS test this
weekend and it appears to be working fine.
I have having onesmall problem thought.
One of our domain names - updategraphiCS.com is getting flagged:
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'cs,com'
found...
How can I get around this ??
I remember a previous discussion regarding someone creating and maintaining
an sd.txt file for everyone to use. Did that ever occur? Does anyone have a
sd.txt file they would be willing to share?
Thank you,
Bill Newberg
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Fw:
[Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS problem
your sd.txt file probably has
cs.com
in it. To fix the prob. just change it to
.cs.com
Jason
- Original Message -
From:
Jeff
Pereira
To: [EMAIL
: [Declude.Virus] Fw:
[Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS problem
- Original Message -
From: Jeff
Pereira
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 9:07 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS problem
I just implemented the SPAMDOMAINS test this
weekend
Any chance that SPAMDOMAINS can have three entries. MSN uses Qwest DSL
in my neighbourhood.
Is there another way to handle this?
Thanks
David Stavert
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing
Is there a site available where I can download the latest sd.txt file that
people are using for the SPAMDOMAINS test?
Thank you,
Bill
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
Title: Message
Hi;
Does anyone know
of the Spamdomain entries for Prodigy?
This is what I saw
in a spam..
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: NOABUSE, NOPOSTMASTER, IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT,
BASE64, FILTER-SUBJECT, FILTER-HEADER-XMAIL, COUNTRY, WEIGHT20s, WEIGHT20r,
FREEEMAILSX-Weight: 49X-Mailfrom:
Razvan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 3:02
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDomains-
Prodigy?
Hi;
Does anyone know
of the Spamdomain entries for Prodigy?
This is what I
saw in a spam..
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: NOABUSE, NOPOSTMASTER, IPNOTINMX
: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:32
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
SPAMDomains- Prodigy?
This looks to be most likely a dynamic DSL
customer of Unity Telephone:
Scott, after thinking some more about Kami's situation, would this
scenario pass or fail the spamdomains test?:
==
SpamDomain.txt file entry:
prodigy.net
Message from (X-Declude Sender):
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Connecting mail server (or one tested based on HOP and
Yesterday I posted that ameritech.net was coming from a yahoo mail server.
Today this one os coming from adelphia.net... as a result I have removed
amertiech.net from the sd.txt file.
Received: from Hyperion.tenforward.com [65.161.10.61] by tenforward.com with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.15) id
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sheldon Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 8:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS
Received: from Hyperion.tenforward.com [65.161.10.61] by
tenforward.com with ESMTP
:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS
Yesterday I posted that ameritech.net was coming from a yahoo
mail server. Today this one os coming from adelphia.net... as
a result I have removed amertiech.net from the sd.txt file.
Is this not only because
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Charles Frolick
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 11:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS
Would you mind sharing your two lists? I would like to be
more aggressive with SPAMDOMAINS, but I know the FP potential.
Thanks
Make the spamdomains entry for yahoo:
yahoo.
instead of:
@yahoo. .yahoo.
There is no need to have it setup with these extra parameters. Let us
know
if that resolves your problem.
I made the change yesterday, but have not heard from anyone yet.
Sheldon
Sheldon Koehler,
I have two today that I question. First it seems sprintpcs.com is coming
from not only sprint.com but sprintip.com:
Received: from Hyperion.tenforward.com [65.161.10.61] by tenforward.com with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.15) id A859C0A90086; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 18:24:41 -0700
Received: from
07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail
Some yahoogroups.com email is bouncing and some is not... Below is a header.
Right now my sd.txt file has:
@yahoo. .yahoo.
Any suggestions?
Received: from Hyperion.tenforward.com [65.161.10.61] by tenforward.com with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.15) id A4CA78D0088; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:29:30 -0700
Some yahoogroups.com email is bouncing and some is not... Below is a header.
Right now my sd.txt file has:
@yahoo. .yahoo.
That line means that any E-mail with a return address including @yahoo
must have a reverse DNS entry with .yahoo. in it (or @yahoo., but that
won't appear in a reverse DNS
This E-mail should not have failed the SPAMDOMAINS test, but it was
whitelisted, so it is not possible to tell whether or not it failed the
SPAMDOMAINS test without looking at the log file.
This was the last email she received from the list. She is now getting
messages saying her email is
: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:42 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS strangeness
Some yahoogroups.com email is bouncing and some is not... Below is a
header.
Right now my sd.txt file has:
@yahoo. .yahoo.
Any suggestions?
Received: from Hyperion.tenforward.com [65.161.10.61
Title: Message
John:
In the SPAMDomains
test it seems like we need to do a correction. This is an email we just
received that triggered BellSouth.
==
X-RBL-Warning:
SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'bellsouth.net' found: Address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from invalid
Is there a way to use this test on domains that receive forwarded
email? Ex someone from AOL sends an email to a server that
automatically forwards the email to the server that is running DJM.
Since the sending server DJM sees is not aol.com/netscape.net in this
example the email incorrectly
I am having a lot of people using prodigy complain about being rejected.
With the headers that have been sent, they are ALL being sent through
yahoo.com. Is yahoo and prodigy in cahoots for email or something?
I have temporarily added:
prodigy.netyahoo.com
to the sd.txt file. So far this
of the majority, it's time
to pause and reflect. Mark Twain
- Original Message -
From: Sheldon Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 9:10 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS prodigy.net
I am having a lot of people using prodigy complain
: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains Weight
Whats the average weight on the Spamdomains test that people are
using. I'm getting good results with Bills list and thinking about
increasing the weight to 10 or so...
--
Rich Griebel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kendra.com
Scanned for Viruses
We give for this test a weight of 55 points and hold on 100.
FP's occur if a client uses a sender-domain listed in the
spamdomains-file but uses another smtp-server (from his ISP) to send out
legit messages.
Another case: A message send from a web form with the sender-adress
inserted by the
It looks like these headers tell me to add:
attbi..comcomcast.net
to the sd.txt file.
Received: from Hyperion.tenforward.com [65.161.10.61] by tenforward.com with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.15) id A15AE91F00FC; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:41:46 -0700
Received: from sccrmhc13.attbi.com (unknown
Note, that for internal email, the IP address used in SPAMDOMAINS is the
email address of the sender. So, for us, that gets translated to our ISP's
name, as only the mail server has rDNS set up (we trap on our own mail
server address in spamdomains, as that was being faked by quite a bit of
email
Note, that for internal email, the IP address used in SPAMDOMAINS is the
email address of the sender. So, for us, that gets translated to our ISP's
name, as only the mail server has rDNS set up (we trap on our own mail
server address in spamdomains, as that was being faked by quite a bit of
Ok, I understand.
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 3:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains lookup timeout
Markus,
The idea is, that we don't
Here is a comment on the web site www.dnsreport.com
When you check a site on this web site the first revdns check can fail and
the explanation is as follow
--
Reverse DNS entries for MX records
This may be a false positive due to the nasty BIND bug (client side) that
causes reverse
After reading 100+ archive message about spamdomain, I was thinking that the
ip used for the RDNS query is the one of the original remote smtp server
but after playing arround with a dummy domain i set up, i have now some
doubts that the test is using the IP of the ip of the original client that
likely spam.
HTH to clarify.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Serge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 8:41 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains: Which IP ?
After reading 100+ archive message about spamdomain, I was thinking that
the
ip used
The RDNS test is run against the IP address of the original sending mail
server, not the IP of the client machine that drafted the message. I don't
believe that intermediate hops are considered in this test, just the RDNS of
the originating mail server. Scott, can confirm this.
Declude JunkMail
Okay, thanks for the clarification Scott.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains: Which IP ?
The RDNS test is run against the IP address of the original
Whats the average weight on the Spamdomains test that people are
using. I'm getting good results with Bills list and thinking about
increasing the weight to 10 or so...
--
Rich Griebel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kendra.com
Scanned for Viruses using Declude and F-Prot
---
[This
Hi all,
I'm not sure about this, but I've seen some spam messages coming from
domains contained in our sd-file. (hotmail.com) However the messages
hasn't failed the SPAMDOMAINS test.
For example from the Sender-IP: 218.25.255.18
Can it be, because it's not possible to finish the REVDNS-query?
]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains lookup timeout
Hi all,
I'm not sure about this, but I've seen some spam messages coming from
domains contained in our sd-file. (hotmail.com) However the messages hasn't
failed the SPAMDOMAINS test.
For example from the Sender-IP: 218.25.255.18
Can
Levis
- Original Message -
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 4:21 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains lookup timeout
Hi all,
I'm not sure about this, but I've seen some spam messages coming from
domains contained in our sd
Title: Message
Hi;
Anyone knows much
about Altavista for SPAMDOMAINS.
Regards,
Kami
: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains: Altavista
Hi;
Anyone knows much about Altavista for SPAMDOMAINS.
Regards,
Kami
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail
I had a spam get through that only failed sniffer. It said it came from
att.com and I only had att.net in the sd.txt file. So I changed it to:
att.att.
I started out with Bill B.'s file and have been following this list with
changes. So far SPAMDOMAINS has worked like a dream.
With the
, June 13, 2003 10:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains: Altavista
Altavista discontinued their free email service about 2 years ago. So if
you're still seeing spam using their domain, you could probably just add a
weight to any email from @altavista.com.
Bill
From: Sheldon Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: www.tenforward.com
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 08:48:07 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains: att.net
I had a spam get through that only failed sniffer. It said it came from
I started out with Bill B.'s file and have been following this list with
changes. So far SPAMDOMAINS has worked like a dream.
Could you post what you have so far? I was waiting for a good example file
before I jumped in to using the test.
Attached is my latest version. But if you followed
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains: att.net
I had a spam get through that only failed sniffer. It said it came from
att.com and I only had att.net in the sd.txt
Title: Message
Scott:
Any chance of you
handling spamdomains much like the Country filter?
you are perhaps
best equipped to come up with a central depository that knows the addresses and
their respective REVDNS info.
This is a great
test and one that if we all can use effectively can all
I wish we could have a central place that would maintain a list with
up-to-date information so we all could use.
How can we do this?
I would be willing to host it. I could set up a specific e-mail address that
everyone could send updates to and I would then review and add it to the
list. It
: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains: att.net
I started out with Bill B.'s file and have been following this list with
changes. So far SPAMDOMAINS has worked like a dream.
Could you post what you have so far? I was waiting for a good example file
before I jumped in to using the test.
Attached is my
: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains: Altavista
Hi Bill:
This is good to know...
Do they have any paid service or any email with Altavista is not correct?
If they are not serving it then this email should not exist.
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Added:
btinternet.com
Sheldon
Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications 360-457-9023
Nationwide access, neighborhood support!
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time
to pause and reflect. Mark Twain
---
Title: Message
Hi;
Does anyone know
the spamdomain entry for concentric.com?
We are starting to
get a lot of spam from this domain and it is part of XO
communications.
Regards,
Kami
- Original Message -
From:
Kami
Razvan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 8:51
AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains:
Concentric.com
Hi;
Does anyone know
the spamdomain entry for concentric.com?
We are starting
to get a lot of spam
Title: Message
Or even simpler:
concentric. .cnchost.com
will work for both .net and .com.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Bill
Landry
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 9:34
AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
SpamDomains: Concentric.com
Compuserver.com is also known as cs.com and comes from aol.com
compuserve.comaol.com
cs.comaol.com
Sheldon
Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications 360-457-9023
Nationwide access, neighborhood support!
Whenever you find
This one came out of no where:
Msg failed SpamDomains (Spamdomain '@mail.com' found: Address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from invalid .).
That's because the return address has @mail.com in it.
We're looking into a way to get around the partial match issue.
Scott, in this case, how much work to allow the use of a space after the
root domain?
Actually, that wouldn't work; neither the return address nor the reverse
DNS entry will have a space in them.
I know they would not, but if the file could have a space, or even another
character that would
Scott, in this case, how much work to allow the use of a space after
the root domain?
Actually, that wouldn't work; neither the return address nor
the reverse
DNS entry will have a space in them.
Why not introduce one or some special characters that in all this
DNS-records,
:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains: Concentric.com
Concentric's .com zone files are not configured properly, so probably the best way to setup the .com zone is like:
concentric.com .cnchost.com
but concentric.net looks like it's configure properly, so you can add this one
/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 01:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
Here is my list thus far:
amazon.com
aol.com
apple.com
att.
attbi.com
bellsouth.net
: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
Here two big international ones:
t-online.de t-online.com
wanadoo.fr
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax
for tin.it
Will this work?
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 6:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
Here two big international ones
will run the risk of matching unintended
domains such as myaccountant.com, business-in-asia.com
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Dan Patnode
Sent: 06 Jun 2003 15:33:26 -0700
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
So then these also won't work:
@2die4.com outblaze.com
no further down the list)
@abc.comxyz.net
@abc.comxyz.org
Your list below should work just fine.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Dan Patnode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
So then these also
-
From: Dan Patnode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
So then these also won't work:
@2die4.com outblaze.com
@accountant.com outblaze.com
@adexec.com outblaze.com
@africamail.com outblaze.com
@allergist.com
: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
Thanks for the clarification. In that example then, the way to go is:
@abc.comxyz.
:)
On Friday, June 6, 2003 16:12, Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those should work fine. What will not work is when the left part is listed
more than once with different
Reply to: Bill B.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list on Friday 9:20:04 AM
Wait a second? When I requested this, was this format put in Declude?
earthlink.com earthlink.net
earthlink.net earthlink.com
email.itwebmessenger.it
excite.com excitenetwork.com
If so, I did
email provided by netscape.net is at least partly based from AOL instant
messenger accounts, which partly correspond to some peoples' real aol.com
email addresses. when you do a full install of Netscape 6 and above, it
links w/ your AIM account for messaging, and provides you a *free*,
Wait a second? When I requested this, was this format put in Declude?
earthlink.com earthlink.net
earthlink.net earthlink.com
email.itwebmessenger.it
excite.com excitenetwork.com
If so, I did not see this indicated in any messages I have read.
This was added to v1.70 -- you can
, 2003 7:20 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
Attached is a list of spamdomains and their coresponding aliases that I've
compiled thus far. Anybody want to comment or expand upon this?
Bill
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
Attached is a list of spamdomains and their coresponding aliases
that I've compiled thus far. Anybody want to comment or expand upon this?
Bill
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http
At 01:36 PM 5/30/2003, John Tolmachoff \(Lists\) wrote:
If someone has a comprehensive spamdomains listing they are happy
with,could they post it for others to analyze/use?
Uh, see the orginal post that started this thread.
I would, except the list archives are still down.
John,
In your list you your have: microsoft.com msn.com
Urgh, I can't win. It is not my list. Please people, read the entire post.
(Yes, I myself am guilty at times, so first admonishment is to me.)
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
Sorry John.
I am questioning the validity of the test more then I am questioning you.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
John,
In your
: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
From what I see, they look to be mutually exclusive:
==
dig mx excite.com
; DiG 9.2.1 mx excite.com
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 15919
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2
What if you had two lines:
msn.com hotmail.com
msn.com microsoft.com
It would NOT fail if it reversed to either hotmail or ms, correct?
Actually, it would fail in this case, since each line is processed
separately from the rest.
: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains
I generally avoid sounding like a cheer leader, but this test is sweet! (inside a
weighting system)
The structure of the text file is a simple list of domains, like:
Ameritech.net
Amrer.net
Angelfire.com
Aol.com
When a domain FPs on a predictable variation, just tab over
On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 07:23 PM, Bill B. wrote:
Somebody mentioned aol.com and netscape.com a while ago, but I cant
recall which format it was. Perhaps somebody else remembers...
aol.com netscape.com
AND/OR
netscape.comaol.com
Bill
I think you mean netscape.net no? I might be
Thats correct, my mistake. It should be netscape.net
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Levitsky
Sent: Thu, 29 May 2003 22:33:21 -0400
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains
On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 07:23 PM, Bill B. wrote:
Somebody mentioned aol.com and netscape.com
101 - 193 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
