RE: [Declude.JunkMail] EServices Autowhite?

2005-09-03 Thread Markus Gufler
You will probably need to add the virtual host keys as well, but you certainly will be able to fake it out using the Registry alone. No IMail EXEs will be necessary to install. Maybe not only virtal host keys but also one for each user mailbox. Autowhite does a great job at my side

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] EServices Autowhite?

2005-09-03 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Maybe not only virtal host keys but also one for each user mailbox. AutoWhite doesn't consult user Registry keys, though it does look up alias Registry keys in order to consolidate aliases and their target usernames under the same .AWL whitelist file. AFAICS: - If a user only uses a

[Declude.JunkMail] ip4r blacklists

2005-09-03 Thread Gary Steiner
I continue to run into a problem where Declude fails to get any response from the ip4r blacklists, then SmarterMail catches the exact same spam using the ip4r blacklists(spamcop, cbl, spamhaus, etc.). Declude support implied that there was a problem with my DNS server. But both Declude and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r blacklists

2005-09-03 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Gary, Someone recently posted that they did not have the HOP x setting in their global.cfg and what was happening is that the ip4r tests were being skipped. Can you check on that? Also, if you drop down to a command prompt and type this what happens. nslookup 2.0.0.127.bl.spamcop.net

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 update

2005-09-03 Thread Kim Premuda
We installed the latest 3.0.3 beta tonight; the decludeproc service shot to 99% of CPU and stayed there for 15 minutes. During this time we accumulated over 1000 items in the proc folder; nothing was going out. Anyone else experienced this? We loaded JunkMail 3.0.3 last night and, this

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail

2005-09-03 Thread Dave Beckstrom
I've found a few Declude bugs and other problems when running in the smartermail environment. 1) Declude leaves directories with names such as 6432144091.vir in the SPOOL/PROC overflow directory and it NEVER goes back and removes these directories or cleans them up. I have to manually delete

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 update

2005-09-03 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Kim, Those were the same error messages that I seen when the work directory was not created. Please see my earlier post - you need to make sure you have a /spool/proc/work directory. Darrell -- DLAnalyzer - Comprehensive reporting

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 update

2005-09-03 Thread Kim Premuda
Those were the same error messages that I seen when the work directory was not created. Please see my earlier post - you need to make sure you have a /spool/proc/work directory. Darrell Thanks, Darrell. I did read your previous post, but not until I had already sent my posting to the list.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 update

2005-09-03 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Kim, I believe in the next beta that they will make sure the directory gets created. Now the other thing to make sure of is did you increase the amount of threads that it will use in the declude.cfg file? By default it appears to use only 5 threads. I bumped mine up to 25 and that seems to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r blacklists

2005-09-03 Thread Gary Steiner
1. I have a HOP 0 line in my global.cfg file. 2. Here's what I get: nslookup 2.0.0.127.bl.spamcop.net Server: ns1.sprintlink.net Address: 204.117.214.10 Non-authoritative answer: Name:2.0.0.127.bl.spamcop.net Address: 127.0.0.2 3. I had been running on debug, but this

re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail

2005-09-03 Thread Gary Steiner
Regarding #5. I've run into spam that was sent to multiple addresses on the server, and the spam was processed by Declude (it's listed in the log files), but somehow when this spam is then moved to the hold directory it gets confused and somehow loses track of the file, and the file doesn't

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 update

2005-09-03 Thread Kim Premuda
Now the other thing to make sure of is did you increase the amount of threads that it will use in the declude.cfg file? By default it appears to use only 5 threads. I bumped mine up to 25 and that seems to be working very well. The other thing which is documented on the beta page is if you

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail

2005-09-03 Thread Dave Beckstrom
Gary, Yeah, that sounds exactly like what is happening and I see messages in the log, as well, that supports what you're saying. Hopefully Declude support will be around on Monday and maybe we can work on getting that one solved. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail

2005-09-03 Thread Darin Cox
Hi Dave, Probably not... Monday's Labor Day. Easy to forget those little things called holidays, isn't it? grin Darin. - Original Message - From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 7:42 PM Subject: RE:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r blacklists

2005-09-03 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IP4R tests are running based on seeing results triggered for the MXRATE tests. The only thing I can suspect right now is that possibly your DNS server was slow to respond on that query and Declude moved on. The results would still have been returned to your DNS server hence why it was picked

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r blacklists

2005-09-03 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Gary, Also, I noticed from the NSLOOKUP below you are using Sprint's DNS? Is this the case for Declude / SmarterMail? Darrell --- DLAnalyzer - Comprehensive reporting on Declude Junkmail and Virus. Download it today - http://www.invariantsystems.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail

2005-09-03 Thread Dave Beckstrom
Darin, Ever since I started working out of a home office I do forget about the holidays! Well, the good news is that I've made some progress in understanding the problem. As long as I don't specify a HOLD action (EG. WEIGHT30 HOLD %DATE%) and instead run with (WEIGHT30 SUBJECT [SPAM]) then

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail

2005-09-03 Thread Darin Cox
Hi Dave, I know what you mean. After the first startup venture in the late 90's, holidays have never been the same... You might try running the 2.06 version for SmarterMail. I've heard mostly success for that. That may buy you some time until the kinks get worked out of the 3.0 beta. Darin.