Did you replace the .cfg file and forget to put your registration code in? I
did that to myself once.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Todd Holt
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
This new beta release has not eliminated the problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Inconsistencies
Anyway, I get a
Time to add it to the trailer.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] DSN:Heuristics and Weight
In response to your e-mail below
Right, right, right. But the manual tells how to create the txt files, and
how to create the test line in the global.cfg. I assume that the final step
in this process is to put a matching line in $default$.junkmail telling what
the action is.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Funny you should mention that.
I'm sitting here waiting for year-end processing to finish, and I'm typing
all of the pm0.net and flowgo IP addresses into a Blacklist file. I hope I'm
doing this right.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
I figured as much. I'm building an impressive list of IP addresses, but I
haven't seen any logfile entries show up yet. I hope I'm doing this right. I
have a test defined this way:
POSTGEN ipfile c:\imail\declude\postgen.txt
in honor of postmastergeneral, my favorite target, and:
AH. Perfect. Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] greylist?
Here's a new problem:
I have the following in my
I put this in global.cfg:
XINHEADER X-Note: Tests failed: %testsfailed%
and I get lines like these in my awesome new Spam Review Message Header box:
X-Note: Tests failed: SPAMCOP2, BADHEADERS, SPAMHEADERS, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT18,
WEIGHT182
I'm having trouble getting any work done, what with
are showing
up as visible in the delivered messages. Is this a glitch, or have I done
something incorrect in my setups?
--
John Shacklett
www.continentaloffice.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail
No, I don't think it is. I'm not using HEADER actions at all, see my
response to Tony.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] header
Just the one, as near as I can tell.
I sent you a pile of examples, once upon a time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] header
I'm getting the weight just fine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
Noticed after updating to v1.0.12
wildcard to the left of whatever is listed, but not to the right; is this a
correct interpretation?
--
John Shacklett
www.continentaloffice.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
That makes sense. I was thinking about the question that was posed the other
day about having a foreign domains test, so I made a fromfile list of
foreign top-level domains. But .co for Colombia catches all of the .com
addresses. Back to the drawing board.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I tried to do exactly this with a fromfile list of TLDs a couple of weeks
ago, but crashed miserably on the rocks of .co matching to .com as well. A
way to weight individual countries differently would be even better.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I had a similar sort of morning, got the sniffer demo, and I've been
watching the mailserver slowly die. My declude log for today has a lot of
external program didn't respond in an hour so skip it messages, so I
commented sniffer back out of my global.cfg. Took a while, but all the gunk
in the
I have a
6.06 installation, and I have a combination of differently-sized subnets in my
local address table, and I have never seen this happen. For example, my IMail
server itself sits in a 255.255.255.240 netmask.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
http://www.moed.uscourts.gov/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Todd Holt
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam/Unsolicited Faxes
Everyone should advertise whatever it is that you
Tom, what is the format for the filters?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 5:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List
I'm already doing this. I have a program on the
I'm getting similar messages for OUTBOUND messages from users of my own
domain.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Helpdesk
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Could you explain HELOBOGUS?
This is where I shop for new features:
http://www.declude.com/relnotes.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darin T. Cox
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is there a feature list for the JunkMail
I thought I had a handle on all this, but this message from Timothy got
snagged by my MYFILTER filter test, which is looking for Saf-E Mail in the
body and applying punitive weights, but I received a message in my own
personal Inbox overnight from Saf-E which didn't trip the word filter, or
My profound apologies to one and all. I'm not having a good morning [I had
an afternoon of hooky planned for the golf course, and it's not going to
happen after all], so I'm making bad decisions.
I could send the headers, but here are two lines from the declude log that
are more to the point:
Right, but isn't that the power of the filter tests? I use a complete list
of ccTLD codes that I downloaded from IANA and I jiggled the individual
weights based on the kind of mail I process here, but I wouldn't imagine
that my weight choices would be appropriate for anyone else anywhere else.
The buttons don't seem that useful to me, but I would like to mention that I
still see the problem where clicking an existing button too quickly in
succession makes SpamReview bomb with an error box that says Run-time error
'55': File already open.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Shacklett
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All
Importance: Low
The buttons don't seem that useful to me, but I would like to mention that I
still see
I'm having a memory failure here. What does the LOG_OK setting in the
global.cfg file control and what are its options, or do I have a line left
in mine from the deep dark recesses of Declude past?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott
That's what I thought. I just reread the Suggestion posts again and I
understand now that the extra functionality being requested is the
To:/From:/Subject: part.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, 10 October
I get email that talks about situations like that all the time, describing
mythical joys and riches beyond belief. I call it spam, and I'm looking
for something that helps me control it. Do you have any suggestions?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
:38:28 Qce29136 R6 Message OK
10/16/2002 16:38:28 Qce29136 L7 Message OK
They only show up sporadically. I'm using a LOGLEVEL MID setting.
I know I've read the answer before and I can't seem to find the right search
term to unearth the answer in the archives.
--
John Shacklett
I understand the thought process there, but I don't agree. I have noticed a
number of bulk mailers, the big commercial ones I guess, that have static
and steady IPs. I have an ipfile for those. I also notice a variety of
domains that I find rather transient, and I fromfile those. When I scan my
I was just in the process of composing EXACTLY the same response when
Roger's reply came through. This here all_list.dat file looks odd to me, but
who am I to judge.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Roger Heath
Sent:
%WEIGHT%
%MAILFROM% 0 0
--
John Shacklett
www.continentaloffice.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why is it that if someone tells you there are 1 billion stars in the
universe,
you will believe them,
but if someone tells you a wall has wet paint
you will have to touch it to be sure
Is the late-lamented never made it out of beta ADULT test completely gone
now?
--
John Shacklett
www.continentaloffice.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why is it that if someone tells you there are 1 billion stars in the
universe,
you will believe them,
but if someone tells you a wall
I'd love to give your program a try.
Written between the lines of the post I first started this thread with: I
have a nagging problem with porn and I have been charged with cleaning it
up. My challenge is that the stuff I'm seeing is stuff that my local users
are sharing among themselves, so I'm
I like Spam Review, and I use it every single day.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2002 1:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] 3rd Party Hold Readers
I've seen
I am a private company, we have an Acceptable Use Policy, I have the backing
of Upper Management, I've sent hate mail to our users warning them of dire
consequences, I understand the issue and the steps required to deal with it.
What I'm working on now is enforcement. This isn't Johnny Cochran,
We just
reclaimed an old domain name. We had it for a couple of years, then it expired
and some bandits in the Philippines grabbed it and held it hostage, and when it
expired again we grabbed it back. The day, and I mean the very day, that I put
that domain in as an alias for our primary
Title: Message
I think
that misses the point of this thread: If I'm bouncing [or rejecting outright]
mail from a host or domain, then they have no appeal recourse unless I can open
up a safe channel for _SOME_ mail to flow through.
On the
other hand, I have abuse@mydomains and
Our CFO, who has never given his email address out to ANYONE! fills out
every reader reply card for a free trade magazine, belongs to the board of
something called the Financial Executives Institute, and answers every
telephone survey-research phone call that crosses his desk. I suspect your
Veep
Here's my take on why I endorse John's request. I understand Dan's
suggestion and agree with its intent, I just don't want to raise my log
level yet. I'm a MID loglevel person, and happy to be there otherwise.
When Declude calls my IPFILE test and nabs a message for failing, the
logfile line
Well, I did only say tempted. I have been pretty heavy handed knocking off
/24 blocks however.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
Sent: Tuesday, 14 January 2003 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
I'm subscribed to the digest version and didn't receive yesterday's digest
either.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, 15 January 2003 3:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail Forum
While we're beating this into the ground like a tentpeg:
including, or specifically excluding, $default$.junkmail?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, 17 January 2003 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
Yes, me too please.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
Sent: Friday, 28 February 2003 9:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Analyzer - Comments Needed
I have a beta available and I am looking for
It constantly occurs to me, as it has to many others who have mentioned this
previously, that what we really need is a FAQ compilation that covers
customization and best-practices for various situations and integration of
the add-on tools and who knows what else. Search the archives hasn't
proven
Maybe the declude -diag output could be tweaked to give a quick count of
whitelist lines.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Saturday, 31 May 2003 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist after
that message should have reached 23 points.
I'm going to comb the log for more instances of SPAMDOMAINS and see what
else is happening, but this little bit was unsettling.
--
John Shacklett
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came
| Are you sure that the line in your sd.txt file is exactly
| msn.com hotmail.com (no spaces or other characters after
|hotmail.com)?
|
|Yes. I copied that line and pasted it exactly and I double checked the
|whitespace before I composed my questions.
|
|One last thing to check: Is that the
The new SPAMDOMAINS test would also be useful, *if* everyone sending mail
with a return address on your domain would be doing so from an IP that has
a reverse DNS entry that matches your domain.
-Scott
The struggle I'm having with putting my
Did you enter
example.com
OR
@example.comexample.com
in your SPAMDOMAINS list? The second (with your domain, of course) should
prevent the false inclusion of mailing lists with your domain on the left.
side of the return address.
I have a separate issue with SMTP AUTH which is
The eerie stillness was nerve wracking. I wondered who would cave in first.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler
Sent: Thursday, 31 July 2003 11:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Is the list down?
Anyone
So long as Bill didn't pick fights with all of us and drive us all off the
list
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Thursday, 31 July 2003 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] If a tree falls in
I had a
funny thing happen over the weekend, I had more items in spool/virus than in
spool/spam at one point. I'm speechless.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Todd - Smart
MailSent: Tuesday, 02 September 2003 8:33 AMTo:
[EMAIL
And I'm seeing more and more of these messages with the text section crafted
cleverly to try and avoid blocks, and with more and more of them with these
text sections large enough to defeat scanning of the message proper by the
usual battery of content-based tests. I think Kami pointed this out
Doesn't the installed.bin file contain the current version number?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, 13 October 2003 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ERROR: SOMEONE CRUMBLED MY MAGIC
Pete's ideas about holding messages in limited circumstances to allow virus
scanning and spam testing to catch up with new threats, and I started asking
myself what delay is 'normal' now.
What kinds of methodology are people using to time things?
--
John Shacklett
www.continentaloffice.com
I posted a question two weeks ago asking if anyone knew a way to calculate
the amount of time it takes for individual messages to clear the entire
receive/virusscan/junkmailscan/deliver process, and this exactly why I
asked. My system doesn't have any filters quite as large as 140kb, or even
70k,
I'm not very good with these unix tools in general, but my set of unxutils
doesn't include usort, and if I try using sort instead, I get a steady
stream of errors from gawk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Thursday, 20
for listening, see you next week.
--
John Shacklett
www.continentaloffice.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They say that genius is 99 percent perspiration and 1 percent inspiration.
Then again, so is mowing the lawn.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com
I think this might be on http://www.ahbl.org/using.php in the rhsbl section.
I have been trying
AHBL-DOMAINSrhsbl rhsbl.ahbl.org * 5 0
for a couple of days, but I don't have any stats to share today.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
text to columns using a space as the delimiter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, 30 December 2003 2:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Sorting log
Importance: High
Any ideas on the
I know this suggestion was kind of tongue-in-cheek, but we did exactly this
for one of our Marketing wonderboys. After 3 days, just three days, he came
into my office waving his white handkerchief and begging for mercy. The
message was sent better than any discussion could have, technical or not.
I had a problem with Sniffer earlier this week that turned out to be a
corrupt update. There was a consistent error in the log for the time period
when that botched update was in place. I've noted since then that several
others have complained of similar issues with their sniffer updates,
although
Roger, this version works on my NT4 machine like a champ. Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Eriksson
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Updated SURBL filter script
We get a fair amount of SPACE subjects from our webmail users. Imail's
webmail interface gets upset if you try and send an email with both a blank
subject and a blank body [for example, an unsubscribe message to an address
that does all of the processing based on the To: address alone], so a
in the SPOOL directory after
the program alias fires off the proper CMD batch.
Can someone remind me of some critical part of program alias care and
feeding that I've forgotten?
--
John Shacklett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.continentaloffice.com
There is a theory which states
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 4:19 PM
To: John Shacklett
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: tmp file residue
Can someone remind me of some critical part of program alias care
and feeding that I've forgotten?
You've found it yourself: it's the removal
Has anyone tried to construct dummy SPF records locally for domains that are
not your own in order to outsmart SPF records in the real world that permit
spammers junk to pass?
--
John Shacklett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.continentaloffice.com
There is a theory which states
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17568.html
I remember this conversation vividly, but I think it crashed on the rocks
quickly. Maybe we need a posse of VB types delegated with the charge of
trying to contact Tom again and see if his offer is still good.
-Original
anyone recommend a tool to quickly look up IP Range assignments
that works more strongly than SamSpade?
--
John Shacklett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.continentaloffice.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
Is there a service on the website where we can look up
our complete current software licensing information and expiration dates of
current Service Agreements?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry
SimpsonSent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 10:10 AMTo:
[EMAIL
to note that it is one more aspect of the conversion of Declude
from something unique to just another product.
--
John Shacklett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.continentaloffice.com
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL
Sorry to waste DJM bandwidth.
I just realized that I stopped receiving Imail_Forum Digests on April 26th.
I've tried to re-subscribe, but is this just me, or have they somehow
scrambled their Digests?
Thanks.
--
John Shacklett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.continentaloffice.com
The Declude staff let me know that v3 won't work on WinNT, so I think I
can't delay the inevitable any longer.
Just for fun, has anyone tried the v3 beta with IMail6 on WinNT?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sorry this is so late.
We've used stunnel for a while now, it also was simple to setup and seems
flawless in operation.
JS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 30 September 2005 6:09 PM
To:
I'm in a fairly unique position in that I actually have a brand new system
sitting on the bench as part of our LONG delayed migration away from
NT4/Imail6 and into the new millennium. So timing is everything, and a
Version 3/Version 4 decision had to be made in fairly short order to be
considered
I'm making the jump to a new mailserver this weekend, and I've hit two
snags. I know that the answers to both of these questions are in the
archives, but the search feature on the list archive appears to be broken
currently. My apologies to all, both for the OT question as well as for
reasking.
Here's my second off-topic question. Thank you again for all the great
suggestions on handling the port forwarding question on Wednesday and for
all the great discussion that spun off of that original thread.
Question two:
I'm making the jump from Imail 6 on NT4 clear up to Imail 2006.03 on
for utilities for Declude And
Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG
Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message -
From: John Shacklett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 4:12 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail
This morning I'm seeing a flood of stock spam with scores that are more than
double my delete weight getting through with no action taken. I'm looking
at one right now with a score of 67, and in my scheme we delete at 30.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No action taken
I'm seeing the same thing. However the headers show all of the tests failed
and the score - well above my delete weight.
John C
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Shacklett
Sent: Monday
Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von John
Shacklett
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Juni 2006 13:37
An: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Betreff: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No action taken
This morning I'm seeing a flood of stock spam with scores that are
more than
Matt, I did get a reply from Gerry earlier and I
resubmitted my earlier support email to him, and he indicated they would
escalate things, but that's it.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: Monday, 05
June 2006 4:29 PMTo:
Actually, Matt, it's worse than that. I have made
several observations about issues I'm having with the current release [for
example: built-in AVG does NOT work for me, not ever, not even once; newest
release version has a virus logging change that broke my daily activity summary
report
is that's
setting things in disarray, it's being logged at log_level mid.
--
John Shacklett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.continentaloffice.com
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E
I'd like to break the flow of the current discussion and circle back a
number of posts to ask a question.
I'm not familiar with either Razor or Cloudmark and Bill's mention of that
service caught me unprepared. How does Razor fit into your analysis? Do you
need SA or something similar to invoke
Thank you, Sandy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Friday, 21 July 2006 2:49 AM
To: John Shacklett
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Razor
Do you need SA or something similar to invoke Razor or does it come
I've
discovered that my mailserver has been listed on CBL. I asked to be delisted,
and they complied, but I'm right back on *SNAP* just like that. Assuming for the
moment that I'm not at risk for the vulnerability covered by MS06-040, and that
nothing infected me before I loaded that
/imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com/msg106753.html
Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail,
mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
John
I'm going through the exact same situation with CBL this week. If you go
into the Advanced section of the SMTP service properties, there's a box to
fill with the text of your HELO response text.
The problem I'm having with them is that even though I already only have
only one HELO/EHLO hostname,
Why wouldn't the defaults in the upgrade be to
mimic the current behavior? That's potentially a major change from trying to
maintain backwards compatibility, isn't it? If the upgrade is adding new
switches, then the default switch shouldn'tshouldn't radically alter the
status quo.
From:
Where does the .HDB file need to end up? I'm not familiar with that
extension.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday, 21 February 2007 1:08 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Image spam
Declude
Isn't the mailfrom in this case [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not the vigara part? Chuck
is looking for a way to filter based on the name attached to the address
and not the specific address proper, isn't that right Chuck?
I'm butting in here because I'm trying to capture something similar using
the
94 matches
Mail list logo
