RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Any fix released for the corrupt message character issues in 3.0.5?

2005-09-29 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Yes, a fix is in place and I believe they are doing the final testing of it. So far, it is I have not seen it reoccur since the update. Contact Declude support about the update. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Any fix released for the corrupt message character issues in 3.0.5?

2005-09-29 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Actually, looks they have official released 3.0.5.5 which fixed the problem. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:34 PM To: Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] JunkMail 3.0.5 100% CPU Usage

2005-09-29 Thread John T \(Lists\)
My current settings are as follows: THREADS 10 WAITFORMAIL 1 WAITFORTHREADS 1500 WAITBETWEENTHREADS 100 WAITFORTHREADS will cause Decludeproc to wait the configured time if the maximum number of threads configured are running before checking to see if it can spawn another thread.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New and old locations of Q files while being processed

2005-10-04 Thread John T \(Lists\)
I understand that in Declude 2.x and lower Declude will rename the Q file by replacing the leading Q with an underscore, and the extension has it's first letter replaced with a tilde. Am I correct in assuming that when 2.x and below moves a Q file into Overflow, that it repeats this same

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 3.05.5 issues

2005-10-04 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Your threads is way too high, and I suspect that there are time outs occurring and not all scanning is being done. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Vanderzand Sent: Tuesday, October 04,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New and old locations of Q files while being processed - SpamReview?

2005-10-04 Thread John T \(Lists\)
John T (Lists) wrote: I understand that in Declude 2.x and lower Declude will rename the Qfile by replacing the leading Q with an underscore, and the extensionhas it's first letter replaced with a tilde. Am I correct in assumingthat when 2.x and below moves a Q file into Overflow

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 3.05.5 issues

2005-10-04 Thread John T \(Lists\)
involvement in the list Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet Computer Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2 519-741-1222 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 12:11 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail sent to Yahoo! address ends up in Bulk folder

2005-10-04 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Best place to start is to find out why it is being placed there. I believe Yahoo adds header lines for filtering, so getting the headers from the recipient would be the place to start. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] chronic junkmail -- new account

2005-10-10 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Interesting thought. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 5:45 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] chronic junkmail -- new

[Declude.JunkMail] DomainKeys

2005-10-10 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Good, bad, indifferent? Now that 3.0.5.5 is out and stable, any thoughts of including a test for DomainKeys into Declude? John T eServices For You --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DomainKeys

2005-10-10 Thread John T \(Lists\)
in DomainKeys, SenderID, or anything else that validates E-mail that comes from a shared server such as this. Happy Monday! Matt John T (Lists) wrote: Good, bad, indifferent? Now that 3.0.5.5 is out and stable, any thoughts of including a test for DomainKeys into Declude

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DomainKeys

2005-10-10 Thread John T \(Lists\)
, especially with Multiple Processors in place. Keith _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of John T (Lists) Sent: Mon 10/10/2005 5:54 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DomainKeys Good, bad, indifferent? Now that 3.0.5.5 is out and stable, any

[Declude.JunkMail] Command line file editor

2005-10-11 Thread John T \(Lists\)
I am looking for a way to edit a text file through command line for use in batch files, generally doing search and replace. If any one has suggestions, please let me know. John T eServices For You --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Command line file editor

2005-10-11 Thread John T \(Lists\)
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Command line file editor - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am looking for a way to edit a text file through command line for use in batch files, generally doing search and replace

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spamheaders

2005-10-11 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Users/clients sending e-mail out should be authenticating and authentication should be whitelisted hence the test does not matter. As for receiving, find out what the common string is that is used in the headers and add that to your whitelisting file giving credit for the same amount as the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spamheaders

2005-10-11 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Who cares if the client is authenticating and you are whitelisting authentication? John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Sullivan Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 5:45 PM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spamheaders

2005-10-12 Thread John T \(Lists\)
on the plant when their emails are scored high due to the spamheaders test. I can't whitelist everyone. I am not sure if you understand my question John? Travis - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005

RE: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IP Blacklist

2005-10-12 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Well, the company is founded and/or run and/or owned by a gentleman that hates spam and has put a lot of time and effort into creating products/services to help out in the war on spam, especially for parents. A couple of years ago, they created a product to work in conjunction with Declude that

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2005-10-12 Thread John T \(Lists\)
A clarification on how to reset Hijack: For Declude versions 2.x and below, you need to end the Deccon.exe process. It is also best to do this with Imail SMTP and Queue Manager service stopped and no Declude.exe processes running to ensure that no process will try to call Deccon.exe during the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Footer32 Question

2005-10-14 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Using PREWHITELIST ON prevents all tests from running. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Anton Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 8:42 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Footer32 Question

2005-10-14 Thread John T \(Lists\)
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Footer32 Question You, sir, are a god among men. It works like a charm. Thank you very much!!! -Chris -- Original Message -- From: John T \(Lists\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PREWHITELIST ON

2005-10-14 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Log is debug mode is best. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:19 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] PREWHITELIST ON

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PREWHITELIST ON

2005-10-15 Thread John T \(Lists\)
] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 12:22 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PREWHITELIST ON I've just sent a debug mode on to support. - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] PREWHITELIST ON

2005-10-15 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Whiteman Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 1:38 PM To: John T (Lists) Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] PREWHITELIST ON BTW, any one know how to get into the BIOS on a Acer 5133SB? Yes, that is a Pentium 133. 133 as in CPU speed, not bus speed. Per Google, F1, F2, or CTRL+ALT+ESC

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PREWHITELIST ON

2005-10-15 Thread John T \(Lists\)
on to support. - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:34 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PREWHITELIST ON Log is debug mode is best. John T eServices For You

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PREWHITELIST ON

2005-10-18 Thread John T \(Lists\)
ON I was very fond of my Acer and spent big bucks buying it when it first came available. Oh for the memories, Windows and Office on floppies! Barry From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 6:34 PM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Held message / Imail Spool viewer

2005-10-18 Thread John T \(Lists\)
What do you mean by held messages in the Imail spool? Are you referring to the Declude Junkmail hold folder? I use SpamReview. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Monday,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Switched to SmarterMail

2005-10-18 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Since I do not user SmarterMail I have not personally tested, but from what some one else has tested and by how it works, the program I have AutoWhite for Declude should work with SmarterMail. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] update to Declude 3.0.5.5

2005-10-19 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Hijack is working fine, what is not in use is the Declude Console, which as Randy posted is going to be reworked into a new version soon. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GlobalWeb.net

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude as a service and Global.cfg

2005-10-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Correct, changes to the config files do not require a restart as the debug log shows that they are checked every time. However, changes to the declude.cfg file probably require a restart of the Decludeproc service. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DecludeProc crashing still

2005-10-25 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Nothing in my logs. When these events occur, you need to do the following: Check for DrWatson logs. Check for files in the proc\review directory Check the logs for that time period. What do the above 3 indicate? John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread John T \(Lists\)
David, you need to amend your sequence: Imail SMTP service must be stopped before stopping the Decludeproc service else if a new message is handed to declude.exe and declude.exe finds Decludeproc is not running, it sends a start command. At least this was the case prior to 3.0.5x. John T

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread John T \(Lists\)
of Imail receiving email. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 1:13 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread John T \(Lists\)
version number reported by v...12? The auto recover on the services tab. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:27 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue

2005-11-01 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Remember, changes to the declude.cfg file call for a restart of the Decludeproc service. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 12:53 PM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Anyone at Exchange and Windows Connections This week?

2005-11-02 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Does I want to be count? It is only 2 hours away, but I am just too busy. How come it is never in the LA basin? John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith Sent: Wednesday, November 02,

[Declude.JunkMail] Interesting thought on some tests when a front end gateway is involved.

2005-11-04 Thread John T \(Lists\)
I sent an e-mail to a software vendor requesting answers to some questions. That message was rejected based on a SPF Fail. Yes, I have SPF records setup for my domains. So how did it fail, bad configuration on the recipient side. By reviewing the heads and the rejection notice, I found that my

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though

2005-11-16 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Threw me for a curve too. I was wondering if Matt was sick until I went back and reread his post. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:36 PM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 2006 standalone

2005-11-17 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Declude does indeed have a copy of Imail 2006 Beta that they have been testing on. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tyler Jensen Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 3:42 PM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude hijack

2005-11-17 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Hijack works like this: Outgoing e-mail is tracked by Hijack by the IP address that Imail SMTP service received it from. Each time a message is received from an IP, the count is increased by one and then the count is compared to the HOLD1 and HOLD2 count numbers to see if it is equal

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Keyword

2005-11-28 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Depends upon how it failed. If by keyword you mean a filter test like my KEYSUBJECT then in the log it will tell you which line of the associated filter file that a match was found. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Keyword

2005-11-28 Thread John T \(Lists\)
held it? Richard Farris Ethixs Online 1.270.247. Office 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 7:17 PM Subject: RE

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] F-prot

2005-11-28 Thread John T \(Lists\)
I have not tried the update, but I am using F-Prot on 4 servers. I just downloaded it onto one of my servers, so at least from Southern California I can get in. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] is it ready?

2005-11-29 Thread John T \(Lists\)
While I am willing to take the plunge today, I will be doing so as time permits. I can do this as my server is low volume. I will let everyone know when I do this. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - At wits end

2005-11-29 Thread John T \(Lists\)
The domain you are trying to send to has DNS problems. http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=ucancap.org Your domain has minor DNS problems. http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=cado-oregon.org Have you tried clearing the DNS Cache on your DNS servers? Have you tried

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - At wits end

2005-11-30 Thread John T \(Lists\)
I have been hesitant to do our own DNS services because of others who have told me doing your own DNS can become a full time job. I am assuming they are talking about a registered DNS server when every hacker in the world wants to play with it. I hadn't thought about activating DNS though.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude.cfg threads procedure

2005-11-30 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Changes to the Declude.cfg file require a restart of the Decludeproc.exe service. Of course, I highly recommend first stopping the Imail SMTP and Queue Manager services before restarting the Decludeproc service but some one has posted that is not needed. John T eServices For You -Original

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Old Imail Forum

2005-12-01 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Title: OT: Old Imail Forum Yes, it is still around. Us old diehards like it best. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn Schmidt Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:51 AM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Paranoia

2005-12-03 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Barry head to bed we can take it over from here for you. Once I head off to bed (after the NASCAR banquet - yes I like to watch cars going in circles for hours at a time) I am sure John can pick up right up (nice thing about the west coast it's still early there). HA HA! What's even funnier

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Paranoia

2005-12-03 Thread John T \(Lists\)
I think everyone realized there are only three weekends left until Christmas! Or in my case, 3 weeks until crunch time. In the 9 available work days for me from December 23 through January 2, (Sundays are never work days,) 6 days are already booked and 1 more is tentative, all with work, so

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Paranoia

2005-12-03 Thread John T \(Lists\)
thpthtpthpthtp John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 12:50 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Paranoia

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Paranoia

2005-12-03 Thread John T \(Lists\)
tpfttpfttpfttpft John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 2:13 AM To: John T (Lists) Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Paranoia What's even

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Paranoia

2005-12-03 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Do you charge holiday rates g? Darin. Isn't that word similar to that four lettered word vacation? ;-) John T eServices For You --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Forwarded email accounts

2005-12-03 Thread John T \(Lists\)
First, the tests used are determined by $default$.junkmail. The only time forward.junkmail would be used is if the user was named forward. Second, unless per domain or per user configurations are in use, the $default$.junkmail will be used. To find out which exact file is being used for actions,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Snow

2005-12-03 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Now wait just a carn cerned minute. Our time is short enough as it is without getting rid of 3 months. Besides, temperatures are just fine here in Southern California. ;-) John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Snow

2005-12-03 Thread John T \(Lists\)
What are you saying, I had to wear a long sleeve shirt to go outside last night! Dan ;) On Dec 3, 2005, at 11:51, John T ((Lists)) wrote: Now wait just a carn cerned minute. Our time is short enough as it is without getting rid of 3 months. Besides, temperatures are just

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Snow

2005-12-03 Thread John T \(Lists\)
I like my four seasons rain, snow and all. Barry Why we have 4 seasons here. Just because they may all occur within 2 weeks... John T eServices For You --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Snow

2005-12-05 Thread John T \(Lists\)
And I thought my little 2 year old nephew drooled a lot. ;-) John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 12:55 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Confirm?

2005-12-08 Thread John T \(Lists\)
The problem with Declude Confirm has to do with programmed folder use. Declude is aware of this issue, and has stated that it will be addressed in a future release, but at this time there is no desire to spend much time on it. As such, I would ask the Declude user community to voice its opinion

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and IMail 2006

2005-12-13 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Who ever said it is not compatible? John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 8:14 AM To: DECLUDE.JUNKMAIL@DECLUDE.COM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Way OT: Future Broadband - Verizon Business Fios Service

2005-12-13 Thread John T \(Lists\)
I am in the same boat. For my workstation, I have to use Adelphia Cable. L I am too far for normal DSL, and a business class IDSL for my backup server is over $100 for just 192 Kbps, which is the max I can get. Oh, BTW, 2 blocks over they have Fiber in the street. But not my street.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc terminating unexpectedly

2005-12-13 Thread John T \(Lists\)
What version of Declude? John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Vanderzand Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 9:31 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and IMail 2006

2005-12-13 Thread John T \(Lists\)
3. Duh, that was widely known and is contained in the documentation. 5. Makes sense. Have to have required fields non-blank to migrate. 7. This is Declude issue, not an Imail issue. This is a known issue and Declude has stated that it will be fixed in a future release. 9. Yep, disabling that can

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Network Solutions Spam

2005-12-15 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Nah, they have been lower and am sure they can find a way to go even lower. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 7:21 AM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is anyone successfully blocking these?

2005-12-15 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Title: Message I believe each one has a URL in the body of .smartblast and either .com or another word and then .com. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn Schmidt Sent: Thursday, December

[Declude.JunkMail] Test idea

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Is there any way, and if not is some one willing to come up with a way, of counting the number of characters in the body and if less than say 10 the penalize x and if less than say 25 then penalize y? John T eServices For You --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA

[Declude.JunkMail] BCC in header

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Since a BCC line from a legit client will never appear in the header, it makes sense then that we can filter on BCC: in the header and penalize a good amount, correct? John T eServices For You --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BCC in header

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
positives before you decide to add weight. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 10:17 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] BCC in header

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Is abend some kind of French word? ;) John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 1:13 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]

[Declude.JunkMail] Upcoming work load

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Any one else ramping up for a heavy work load? Starting tonight and going full force on Friday afternoon, I have major projects for Friday, Saturday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday. Monday the 2nd is reserved for work on my servers. ;) Replace 1 SQL server Replace 1

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
. good Abend! :-) Markus From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 10:23 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend Is abend some kind of French word? ;) John T

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Upcoming work load

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Upcoming work load Glad to see that you at leastare takingChristmas offto rest. Best of luck to you on your installs and upgrades. Darin. - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) To: Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Upcoming work load

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. John T (Lists) writes: Any one else ramping up for a heavy work load? Starting tonight and going full force on Friday afternoon, I have major

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 10:23 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend Is abend some kind of French word? ;) John T eServices For You

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-22 Thread John T \(Lists\)
(Business) Fax: +1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 04:51 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend John T (Lists) wrote: Is abend

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Upcoming work load

2005-12-22 Thread John T \(Lists\)
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Upcoming work load What little there is after all the necessities. You mean like software upgrades and new hardware, no? Food? Whazzat? :-) -d - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-22 Thread John T \(Lists\)
DC Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend DC DC John T (Lists) wrote: DC DC DC Is abend some kindof French word? DC AbnormalEnding. - circa 1985 - coined with the introduction of Microsoft products. DC -Nicko DC DC DC DC DC ;) DC DC DC DC

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hardware Issue

2005-12-26 Thread John T \(Lists\)
OUCH! Gee, I thought this is the kind of thing that we were told no way would happen. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Franco-Rocha Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 9:29 AM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hardware Issue

2005-12-26 Thread John T \(Lists\)
. Nothing is bulletproof. Some are just better than others. Monday, December 26, 2005, 11:50:20 AM, John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JTL JTL JTL JTL OUCH! JTL JTL JTL JTL Gee, I thought this is the kind of thing that we were told no way would happen. JTL JTL JTL JTL JTL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Hardware Issue

2005-12-26 Thread John T \(Lists\)
There goes Goran again with interesting words. ;-) John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 2:26 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DEBUG log oddity

2005-12-27 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Are you sure it is not there for every message that is delivered? John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 8:59 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hardware Issue

2005-12-27 Thread John T \(Lists\)
needs to staff 24/7 to address problems as they arise. Darin. - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 3:50 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hardware Issue True, very

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] proc directory orphans

2005-12-28 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Are there any related D files left over? Could these be confirmation list messages that has to do with the Declude Confirm problem? John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Green dfn Systems

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] proc directory orphans

2005-12-29 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Uh, that is kind of time critical. Is e-mail moving and being processed? Again, are they just Q with no D? Is the Decludeproc server running? John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Green dfn

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Alive?

2006-01-02 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Yep, alive and well. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 2:25 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Alive?

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] F-prot

2006-01-05 Thread John T \(Lists\)
This really belongs on the Virus list. I finally just got logged into their server and am downloading now. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer weighting

2006-01-13 Thread John T \(Lists\)
SNIFFER-TRAVEL external 047 C:\Imail\Sniffer\yourlicensecode.exe yourverificationcode 15 0 SNIFFER-INSURANCE external 048 C:\Imail\Sniffer\yourlicensecode.exe yourverificationcode 15 0 SNIFFER-AV-PUSH external 049 C:\Imail\Sniffer\yourlicensecode.exe yourverificationcode 15 0

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Left over D*.SM$ files in proc\work

2006-01-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
How often is this happening? Are you using Hijack? Put both the Junkmail and Virus logs into Debug until a couple of these occur, then extract from the log files ALL lines pertaining to the files in question into one file in exact time sequence along with the log lines from Imail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Server Watching.

2006-01-23 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Although some may have strong opinions against this, but I use WhatsUp Professional. (Well, it is sitting there waiting for me to start using it.) John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerod M.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Server Watching.

2006-01-23 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Andrew, do you administer and support MOM? If so, please contact me off list. BTW, what server did DAD stand for? (It never made it off the design board, of if it did it never became a beta, only an alpha.) John T eServices For You -Original Message- From:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Server Watching.

2006-01-23 Thread John T \(Lists\)
- Server Watching. John T (Lists) wrote: BTW, what server did DAD stand for? (It never made it off the design board, of if it did it never became a beta, only an alpha.) well with family court so prevalent I would guess MOM got all of DAD's stuff? -Nick :) John T eServices For You

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink/prodigy

2006-01-24 Thread John T \(Lists\)
And since ATT now owns SBC, aren't we getting back to Ma Bell? John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 3:56 PM To: JunkMail Declude Subject:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink/prodigy

2006-01-24 Thread John T \(Lists\)
@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink/prodigy I think you've got it backwards, SBC acquired ATT but is keeping the ATT name. Bill - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 4:23 PM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-25 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Sandy, I agree with you. That fact that I was going to be silent has to do with my perception of the users on this list, as compared to other lists that I participate on that I am well know to posts rants. The fact of the matter is I was one of the ones heavily (to my knowledge) involved in

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SMTP Gateway

2006-01-25 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Plans for a gateway version of Declude are still alive. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 6:02 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Ping 2-3-06

2006-02-03 Thread John T \(Lists\)
What? Message, what message? I did not get the message. I did not even get the memo. How come I never get the memos. Gees, if I had gotten the memo, I could have stayed in bed this morning. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Extortion

2006-02-05 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Matt, I agree with you. It would mean nothing to a major spammer to spend 1/4 cent per message to have it guaranteed delivered. For 100K messages, that would be $250 which would actually improve the spammers' chances for more responses since the recipients would then trust the sender. John T

[Declude.JunkMail] elabs3.com

2006-02-08 Thread John T \(Lists\)
What do others have about this sender? John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] elabs3.com

2006-02-08 Thread John T \(Lists\)
12:14 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] elabs3.com Block by default, whitelist exceptions. They have a lot of spam lists, but also do some mailings for legitimate companies. Matt John T (Lists) wrote: What do others have about this sender

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4 changes ... worried...

2006-02-10 Thread John T \(Lists\)
I think we need to stop jumping to conclusions and wait for an official response from Declude (which should have already happened.) I have a feeling that the $1450 for a new license and not for a renewal SA. If that is the case, some one from Declude needs to clarify this on the web site stating

  1   2   3   4   >