I've already written tech support asking them if there are different
result codes for avgscan.exe, and if there are none, if they could add them.
If they do add them, please do post the information here. :)
Here's what the DOS version provides:
I have a problem. I just noticed that since adding the line BANNAME
DELETED0.TXT to my Virus.cfg, my BANnotify.eml file is bouncing
notifications in response to these files. I tried SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS
DELETED0.TXT, but that didn't work. The problem of course is that these
files aren't in
I am having a problem here... not sure if it is with declude or with f-prot.
Thought I would ask here. What is happening is this. My mail will be coming
in, I run task manager and see many declude.exe running. then all of a
sudden mail will not come in. when I check the task manager this
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=comcast.net
Shows they DO support the postmaster account.
That actually just means that they *have* a postmaster account.
However I get this in mail headers form any Comcast.net users.
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Just recently installed a Declude Virus trial (and will purchase). I'm
finding the program to be as good as I expected having used Declude
Junkmail for about a year. I'm having just one problem. Though I've put
BANCRVIRUSES OFF in virus.cfg, messages with the blank folding
vulnerability
The problem: It looks like IncrediMail has introduced many new and very very
important email features like colored backgrounds, emoticons, animations,
... but is not able to create a proper simple email.
G
Question: Are vulnerabilities like Blank folding non-RFC conform formats
or is this simply
I would much rather prefer to filter vulnerabilities with JunkMail. This
stuff scares me.
The fact that it scares you is exactly why it should be done with Declude
Virus.
Scott, isn't this somewhat the equivalent of a virus scanner going after
Zap The Dingbat??? There's no virus there, just
I totally get how wide the hole is, though I wonder about how many of
these have been patched for some time? Still though, it doesn't seem to
catch any viruses, just 99% spam, and maybe 1% legit E-mail. In fact a
search of Google for some of the Vulnerabilities will turn up people
bitching
What version automatically stops the forging ( or ones that are deemed
forging ) viruses from sending out emails to the receipent and/or other
postmaster ?
We are running v1.75
If you upgrade to 1.77 at http://www.declude.com/virus/manual.htm it will
automatically stop the bogus
Pardon my language... butDAM...
Where are all these virus-infected emails coming from?? Are they coming from
home computers, servers or what??
We went through a list of about 60,000 different IPs that were sending
Mydoom, and got reverse DNS entries for them, to figure out who was sending
Would it be possible to E-mail one of the quarantined D*.SMD files to our
virustrap@ account? We can then analyze it and should be able to get a
better idea of why this is happening.
I sent sample d*.smd virus files and postmaster and log file txt to the
virustrap account.
It looks like
I'm using Grisoft's AVG 7.0 professional, and I've been getting this a
lot:
02/03/2004 08:44:02 Qb395000802285220 Error 6 in virus scanner 1.
02/03/2004 08:44:02 Qb395000802285220 Scanned: Error in virus scanner.
[MIME: 2 800]
I already emailed AVG, but haven't heard back. Anyone have any idea
I resent it last night from my yahoo account. Did you receive it at the
virustrap address?
No -- the only E-mail to arrive there was the one from GroupShield for
Exchange.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
Please check the virustrap mailbox again, hopefully third attempt is a
charm...
It came through -- it looks like the one from last night probably did as
well, but got caught here.
Are you running 3 virus scanners with Declude Virus? The only thing that I
can think of that could account for
I am using F-Prot with Declude Virus and have had something interesting
happen today. I currently have Declude Virus set to delete emails with
viruses. However, somehow a user was using webmail on my Imail server and
sent a message that contained a virus to a user that has his account on our
Are you running 3 virus scanners with Declude Virus? The only thing that I
can think of that could account for this happening is if there are 3 or
more virus scanners being used with Declude Virus.
No, just two. We replaced McAfee with TrendMicro. Here are the actual
virus scanner config
This morning Norton caught a copy of MyDoom in my inbox. At first I assumed
it was just one of the damaged variants, but I decided to track it down and
make sure.
Following is a log snippet from when the message came in.
20040201 205725 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (2CA400EE) [64.186.56.58]
However, I think you hit it with the SMTP service being restarted. While I
didn't restart it, I found this in the event log:
The IMail SMTP Server service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this 8
time(s). The following corrective action will be taken in 0 milliseconds:
No action.
There is a
This is indeed due to an issue with Declude Virus -- it will be fixed in
the next interim release.
Scott, I upgraded to Declude v1.77i26 and that took care of the file name
issue - thanks! However, I am now noticing that about 1 in 10 postmaster
messages is displaying virus in Unknown File,
Attached are 5 recent samples. Let me know if you need more.
Thanks -- that information is very helpful. It seems that the problem
occurs when there are more than 2 MIME segments (perhaps these are coming
from bounce messages).
Would it be possible to E-mail one of the quarantined D*.SMD
Processor is up around 85-90%
If you use Task Manager, go to the Processes tab, and click the button that
says CPU (which sorts by CPU usage), which process(es) are at the top of
the list?
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam
Using SKIPIFFORGING means we don't have to keep adding
SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS to the eml's for each new forging virus, right???
Can we then remove the SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS lines?
Correct -- *if* you are running the latest beta.
What specifically do we put in virus.cfg and/or the individual eml's?
Just
Is there a quick way that I can suppress the notifications being sent to the
sender... and the sender's postmaster
The options are:
[1] Upgrade to v1.77, which automatically supresses them, or
[2] Delete the \IMail\Declude\sender.eml and
\IMail\Declude\otherpostmaster.eml files, or
[3] Manually
Am I correct that if we don't have a current service agreement then we can't
upgrade to any version above 1.75?
It depends on when the Service Agreement expired. You are entitled to run
any version that is released while your Service Agreement is
active. Although we prefer that people run the
Are multiple scanners run in series or concurrently?
They are run in series.
Since the virus scanners typically use up as close to 100% of the CPU time
that they are given, if we switched to running them in parallel, an
improvement would only be shown on servers with multiple
processors.
Scott - did you ever find these guys? They still don't get it...
Received: from prudentialrand.com [65.160.6.2] by mail.toplineus.com with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.07) id A36A225A007C; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:08:26 -0500
We're still trying to track them the toplineus.com people.
The current version number that we are running is 1.75. Our service
agreement expired on 12/31/03. What is the highest version number we can
upgrade to?
The latest beta, v1.77, was released in December so you are entitled to run
that version if you wish.
If they are run in series, then wouldn't it be best to run the next
scanner only if the previous scanner passed? In other words why scan the
email again if it already failed one of the scanners?
The logic behind that is the only a small fraction of E-mail contains a
virus. Since the majority of
Scott - did you ever find these guys? They still don't get it...
I finally got a hold of someone there. It looks like they will fix the
problem, but I just have to convince them first that it wasn't really
someone on your server that sent the virus. :)
The best of both worlds approach would be to allow for a switch,
SKIPIFFOUND ON. Removing the second scanner isn't a good option as
variants can come at any time and both F-Prot and AVG lagged badly on
picking up both Mimail.s and MyDoom.b.
We will look into adding an option like this.
Has anyone been catching any of these? I updated F-Prot this morning and
verified that .B was in the virus list but still none have shown up. We are
getting blasted with .A though.
We're seeing about 5,000 Mydoom.A's for every 1 Mydoom.B, so you probably
just have been lucky enough not to have a
Since this is the only one I have seen as all else has been caught, I do not
know the real virus size
The size of what came in here is 14K.
The real Mydoom.A is around 22K, so the one you got was definitely a
corrupt (truncated) copy.
One more question, everyone is talking about version 1.77ixx
Is the name of the file otherpostmaster1.eml or otherpostmaster.eml?
It can be whatever you want, but the default one is otherpostmaster.eml
For some reason, I have it as otherpostmaster1.eml but I am now seeing it in
the manual as otherpostmaster.eml.
Either way will work fine -- Declude Virus
F-Prot is the first virus and the log samples I provided show the F-Prot did
report the virus name. In fact, the log and postmaster report both use the
first scanners reported virus name (in this case F-Prot reported the virus
as Mydoom) instead of the second scanner (TrendMicro, which reports
Due to the overwhelming amount of MyDoom quarrantines, my virus folder is
huge.
I know this has been addressed, sorry, but can I just delete what is in
there?
Yes, you can, if you have no need for the viruses. :)
You can also use the DELETEVIRUSES ON setting to automatically delete them.
i'm still using forgingvirus and want to enable autoforge
what will happen if a virus is marked by both ?
You'll see [forged], and the notification won't be sent.
can we change the autoforge action so it just tag the virus as forgingvirus
?
It's on the to do list.
Does the extension name of a file play in the proper scanning of an
attachment? IE: If we rename a ZIP file to say test.ziz to get by the
ban on ZIPs. Will it still get scanned ok?
That's up to the virus scanner -- it *should* detect that it is a .ZIP
file. F-Prot definitely does. So if it
I'm trying to understand the report results for one of our client's domain
names. The name is ezrentnow.com. We host both DNS servers (primary is
bcw4.bcwebhost.net and secondary is dns2.bcwebhost.net). I know that the
registrar holding the name (gkg.net) has an error and lists the secondary
So with the new beta, I don't have to change anything in the config files?
Does this make the SKIP in the .eml notifications obsolete?
Correct.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus:
I am confused as to how add this to JM.
Lets say we want to send a copy of the email to a certain mailbox and also
CC the spam address for the domain.
Rule1mailbox spam
Rule1COPYTO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
can these be done with one rule or is mailbox a final action?
Most system notifications come by way of the null SMTP sender, , while
having a valid address in the from field. If I'm not mistaken, Declude
Virus can't be configured this way.
Correct (IMail's imail1.exe process, which is used to send the
notifications, does not allow E-mail to be sent from
Would it work to have a Reply-To address of instead? Assuming of
course that Declude Virus supports Reply-To and mailer daemon's would use
the Reply-To address.
It might be worth a try, but I don't think it will work. Most bounce
messages will normally go to the return address (in the SMTP
To the admin responsible for the Imail server running Declude at
Camargocadillac.com, I have attempted 3 times to notify you to have you stop
sending out Declude notifications to forged addresses. Please correct this
problem.
We sent them an E-mail earlier today (their ISP, actually), after
How do you know if spyware is on a PC? Does Declude or Imail identify
and remove sneakly applications such as these?
That is up to the AV program. Most AV programs do not attempt to detect
spyware. However, if the AV program you use with Declude Virus is capable
of detecting spyware, then it
I use F-Prot and I don't know if they block this. I will check it out.
They do not. Very, very few AV programs detect spyware. If you want to
detect spyware sent in E-mail, it may be best to use a program like
PestPatrol with Declude Virus in addition to F-Prot.
FYI, there is a new fast-spreading virus out there, that is too new to be
caught by AV programs yet.
So far we have seen filenames of body, data, document, file,
glszfj, message, readme, test, text, vgsu042a, and vncexdl,
with extensions of .pif, .scr, .zip.
It may be a wise idea to
Well, that's a good sign then that JunkMail will at least add a few points
to it. If I'm correct, that error also causes BADHEADERS to trip as well...
No (this is important).
If an E-mail has headers that are [1] common in spam, and [2] rare in
legitimate E-mail, it will fail either the
Does the BANNAME entry in virus.cfg support a comment on the end of the
line?
No.
We are banning a number of specific filenames due to specific
virus threats and I would like to put the virus name next to the BANNAME
entry.
In this case, I would recommend adding a comment line before it, such
There I was today adding some new BANNAME's to the virus.cfg file when I
notice .vir directories starting to stack up...
Running declude 1.76i14
Is there any help out there?
Yes -- run the latest release, latest beta, or latest interim release. Any
of the above should fix your problem. :)
I noticed while testing the command line output that the switches
recommended in the manual doesn't include /NOBOOT and as a result, F-Prot
will scan your boot sectors every time it is run. This would waste clock
cycles. I also included the /PACK option which is said to unpack
compressed
Can you tell us what things the test checks for? That might help us fine
tune our configurations based on the traffic we see.
No -- we don't want spammers knowing what we check for. Spammers have
actually purchased copies of Declude JunkMail, so it would not be
unreasonable to think that they
I include the VIRUSCODE 8 for holding suspicious files, and -AI to
enable neural-network virus detection. I'm not sure why Scott did not add
at least the -PACKED switch back then, figured maybe he though I was just
being overly cautious.
The -PACKED switch is used for .exe files that are
Is there any way to disable the Partial (Fragmented) Vulnerability check?
Only by disabling all vulnerability detection.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and
We have seen about 35 so far this morning.
Mcafee says it is a Forging virus...
This one definitely is a forging virus.
Right now, it looks like Bagle is now accounting for over 20% of all
viruses (excluding vulnerabilities).
-Scott
---
I am running f-prot (windows version) with declude.
When I get the virus-list (fpcmd -virlist vir.txt), I do not find
[EMAIL PROTECTED] listed there, and I have my virus definitions updated.
I wonder if something is wrong with my f-prot settings, or perhaps I am
missing something.
What is the
These are my def status:
SIGN2.DEF created 19 January 2004
F-Prot definitely should detect Bagle with the 19 Jan 2004 definitions.
For some reason, it seems that the /VIRLIST doesn't display Bagle -- I
can't explain why, though. But it is catching it (as W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]).
im new to declude and i have to make some changements to the config file
as we have only problems with Outlook 'CR' Vulnerability, i would like to
disable this one
it seems, that some self written form2mail handlers and imail produces
more false positivs then it does help
i have seen in
For some reason an attachment infected with the W32.bugbear.B.Dam is
getting through today.
The .Dam means damaged, and usually indicates a corrupt, non-viable
(safe) variant (which AV programs may or may not detect).
-Scott
---
Declude
what must I do to use the Declude Queue Feature?
It is automatically enabled (except with very old versions of Declude).
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and
Any progress?
We are still working on this.
The processing of recipients from Q*.SMD files is extremely tricky, even
the smallest change will affect something, so it is slow work.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution
what must I do to use the Declude Queue Feature?
It is automatically enabled (except with very old versions of
Declude).
How do I see it working?
I have ~ 400 Q* Files in my Spooldir, no directory overflow or something
like that.
If there is no \IMail\spool\overflow directory, the problem is
--NextPart_see7a
Content-Type: image/gif;Name = tst.gif
Here's the problem -- this Name = tst.gif is not RFC-compliant, and
triggers an Outlook vulnerability.
It looks like the sender will need to upgrade or replace their program
Mail v1.0 based on anyMail v1.1. But with a name of
Here's a message that I received this morning. The message is obviously
forged, but I'm curious if others have seen messages that appear
to come from discussion lists that they are subscribed to complete with
appropriate subject lines and passable to and from lines. This is the
fourth or
Are you treating Sobig.C as a forging virus?
Yes. All variants of Sobig are being treated as forging.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in
I'm either missing what you are referring to or it isn't there, or I am
wrong on what the current order of execution is. Could you be more
specific as to which option you are speaking of?
You can add a line AVAFTERJM ON to accomplish this. However, be warned
that any E-mail held by Declude
I don't want to throw away false positives and I don't want our mail admin
to have to look through all messages flagged by Declude Virus because that
could possibly take a lot of time.
FWIW, the de-facto standard is to delete them or quarantine them.
All up-to-date mailserver virus scanners
As I'm seeing the line in Sophos SWEEP for NT I was thinking I did
something wrong. However, here are both report files (manually run from the
commandline). Where is Declude getting the sting in Sophos NT from?
I'm guessing that it is in your .eml file. :)
That's the funny part, I had looked at it but that's not it either. Here's
my postmaster.eml file:
Good catch.
It turns out this is a flaw with the way that Declude Virus is handling the
multiple scanners. It is automatically overwriting the filename that
F-Prot reports (the correct one) when
Below is the line I have in my virus.cfg file:
SCANFILEd:\imail\declude\FProt\f-prot.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOMEM
/ARCHIVE /NOFLOPPY /NOBOOT /DUMB /REPORT=report.txt
But I still receive the following in my logs when running the virus scanning.
12/11/2003 11:49:32 Qa01a010901fa167a Could
Yep, This is what I have in the virus.cfg file.
SCANFILEd:\imail\declude\FProt\f-prot.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOMEM
/ARCHIVE /NOFLOPPY /NOBOOT /DUMB /REPORT=report.txt
Is this all on one line? If not, you need to combine it into one line, so
that it begins with SCANFILE and ends with
We're getting viruses tossed into the virus directory, but it's not being
logged. I have the following settings..
Declude 1.77
Imail 8.03
F-Prot 3.14b
Virus.cfg line for F-Prot - :\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\F-Prot.exe /TYPE /SILENT
/NOMEM /ARCHIVE /NOFLOPPY /NOBOOT /DUMB /REPORT=report
It's catching
And what about LOGFILE? That determines where Declude Virus saves the log
file.
Is anything appearing in the log file?
-Scott
At 05:15 PM 12/14/2003, Rich wrote:
MID
Rich
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Before I consider this feature further, let me doublecheck.
If a mail fails the vulnerability check AND a virus check, but has an EML
template with ONLYSENDIFVIRUSNAMEHAS - will the notification be sent or
not? Example:
When Declude Virus detects both a vulnerability and a virus, Declude Virus
I was looking at the McAfee help file, and there were /mime and /mailbox
switches. Am I missing something?
You can ignore those. McAfee won't see any MIME segments or mailboxes --
Declude Virus handles all that. McAfee will just see an attachment (one
that will be deleted immediately after
We have just released Declude Virus v1.77 (beta). See
http://www.declude.com/virus/manual.htm . Notable changes since the last
beta include:
o BANNAME option would cause problems when too many entries were
used; fixed.
o Added SKIPIFFORGING option for .eml files.
o
Is the /clean switch in McAfee AV (Enterprise Edition 7.1) supported
within Declude?
No, it is not.
In other words is there a problem with adding /clean to the virus.cfg file?
Yes, there would be a problem. Specifically, McAfee will clean the decoded
attachment that Declude Virus creates,
Several people have reported issues with E-mail not being delivered over
the past few days.
The problem has been identified; there was a problem with v1.76 (beta) and
subsequent interim releases and the BANNAME option. This issue is fixed in
a new interim release v1.76i30 at
However one of my colo customers purchased IMAIL and declude lite virus
version.
I set the server up just like mine but I keep getting an error when it
fires up.
declude.exe continues to say;
INSTALLING DECLUDE FOR THE FIRST TIME
INSTALLATION COMPLETE!
The above is written to the dec log file
Scott, my list also longer then the list in the sender.eml file. You are
missing
Avril
I can't seem to find any indication that Avril is a forging virus.
Gibe
This appears to use the sender's E-mail address as the return address.
Hybris
This is indeed a forging virus. The files will be updated
Thanks Scott. I am pretty sure that is what I did; one of the few things I
actually remembered.:(( I just tried it again, and the virus.cfg only lists
Klez. The last line in the file is FORGINGVIRUS Klez. Is it me?
The virus.cfg file just has a sample FORGINGVIRUS entry (since few people
use
Is it possible to put the mails with blocked extension in a separate
directory than the mails with a virus? The directory name could be
\Imail\spool\ext.
This is already in the suggestion database, and something that we plan to
add to a future release.
I just received thisI've pasted the message below. It came with a midi
which my firewall stripped but I'd say this looks like some sort of virus?
It's definitely a rogue E-mail:
Received: from vsmtp4.tin.it [212.216.176.224] by todhunter.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.15) id A6C26340126; Thu, 20
Over the last few days, the majority (about 98%) of entries in our
Virus log look like this:
11/18/2003 04:10:10 Qeff80ed6013007fe 50 is too many MIME levels to recurse
11/18/2003 04:10:10 Qeff80ed6013007fe 50 is too many MIME levels to recurse
11/18/2003 04:10:10 Qeff80ed6013007fe 50 is too many
Note that the scan_alias ON and scan ON do not need to be in there (the
DEFAULT ON will set them both to ON).
If I remove the scan and scan alias NOTHING will be scanned. For some reason
the default does then nothing.
What version of Declude are you running (\IMail\Declude -diag from a
command
I am currently working on a demo version to see if this program is the one
we need. Seems cool but there is one problem I wonder if its solvable.
I want to scan a domain (scan) and not scan another one (noscan). I set
default to 0. Is there a way to make it scan all domains exept the noscan
This is just a reminder to NEVER send viruses, suspected viruses, or
unknown files to mailing lists or any address not specifically set up to
handle viruses.
We have an address [EMAIL PROTECTED] that is designed to handle viruses
safely. Nobody should intentionally send any potentially unsafe
Are you referring to my message, Scott. It was strictly the text of a
message received and did not include anything executable. Since our Declude,
Groupshield nor my desktop McAfee detected as anything executable I felt it
was safe to send it as it was, strictly ASCII text and as such not a live
Hmmmwe are currently already using McAfee VirusScan Enterprise 7.0 with
engine 4.2.60 and Dat version 4304 (Nov 14.) I use a batch file to copy the
DAT files daily to the folder for use be the command line scanner after the
McAfee auto-update. Our mail servers are updated daily with the
Here also same situation 2+ alerts daily, stopped alerting. Otherwise it
was big load to server compared to regular mail delivery.
Anybody please suggest me a way to get rid of this.
When there is a virus that is causing huge problems due to its volume (as
was the case for many people with
Is it possible to not scan an email from a specific sender for
vulnerabilities?
No.
They are tripping the 'blank folding' vuln. and we
quarantine it. Thanks,
Why do you want them to be allowed to send E-mail with vulnerabilities?
-Scott
---
Is is possible (using per user settings) to simply suspend the
vulnerability scanning, yet still keep the main virus scanning on?
No. The vulnerability detection can only be turned on/off globally. For
an individual account (or domain), it can only be turned on/off along with
virus
How is everyone blocking this virus?
Declude Virus will automatically block Mimail, unless your AV software does
not detect it.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known
I'm trying to narrow down a problem where zip attachments that are
received via IMail 8.03 w/hf are corrupt. Same zip via FTP or HTTP check
out OK. Using the latest Declude virus beta and F-Prot 3.14b. The
declude log looks great, no errors.
Are they being sent as attachment-only E-mails
They are regular emails, I just sent you an example.
They definitely are corrupt (2 of the 3 in the E-mail you sent). However,
I can't explain what would be corrupting them (or whether they were corrupt
before they were sent).
-Scott
---
We have a number of large customers who has serius problems with 'Blank
Folding'
We would like to be able to skip scanning for this single problem until
the problems are solved on a per domain setting.
Unfortunately, the only way to do this is to turn off all vulnerability
detection, which is
I'm running Declude v1.76i14, and it is my understanding that this version
will lookup the virus name via DNS to see if it's forging or not.
Correct.
It appears that the below virus is forging, but I believe my logs show it
trying to send a notification to the sender.
We've updated our server
after putting in this BANCRVIRUSES OFF
I still get this
[Outlook 'Boundary Space Gap' Vulnerability] / [No attachment]
There is an interim release 1.76i16 at
http://www.declude.com/release/176i/declude.exe that will take care of this.
-Scott
We started seeing these are 8am this morning
The attachment comes as photos.zip and so far neither Mcafee or F-prot is
catching them.
We recommend adding a line BANNAME photos.zip to the
\IMail\Declude\virus.cfg file (with v1.76 or higher), which will catch this.
From: james@current domain
I have never experienced this problem. What version of Imail does it
relate to?
I believe the reports have been for IMail v8. So you may want to wait on
upgrading to v8 (or test it on another server, first).
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The
Attached is the file for your review - we ran declude for about 2 min. It
almost crashed the iMail server.
What do you mean by it almost crashed the IMail server? How many E-mails
do you send/receive per day on this server?
10/28/2003 23:30:36 Q5532251336c 1 [1 of 2 not deleted] files were
401 - 500 of 1188 matches
Mail list logo
