Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

2008-06-23 Thread Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
One side note - if this feature is added please make sure this feature 
is configurable so we can disable it if we choose (which I would).  I 
have customers who hold all spam for a certain period of time and than 
we delete.  If anything needs to be returned to the queue it is scanned 
manually or returned to the proc for reprocessing.  Virus scanning on 
all messages held would defeat the whole purpose of AVAFTERJM for their 
implementation.


Darrell

--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, 
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.



Bonno Bloksma wrote:

Hi,
 
(Open mail request)

Dear Declude people.
 
I have asked this before and with the current spam levels kan we PLEASE 
have this feature now ASAP? We all want to use AVAFTERJM but could you 
PLEASE make it scan all mail which is not deleted?
If that is a to big step at first becasue of all the possible copy, 
routeto, etc statements can we at least have it for the HOLD action asap?



Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer

tio hogeschool hospitality en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  / www.tio.nl 
http://www.tio.nl


- Original Message -
*From:* Kevin Bilbee mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* declude.virus@declude.com mailto:declude.virus@declude.com
*Sent:* Friday, June 13, 2008 5:25 PM
*Subject:* RE: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG

Be careful with this setting. If a message gets held as spam it will
not be
virus scanned. Make sure you scan any message moved back into the
delivery
queue for viruses before placing it in the delivery queue folder.



Kevin Bilbee

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
  Darin Cox
  Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 6:10 AM
  To: declude.virus@declude.com mailto:declude.virus@declude.com
  Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
 
  AVAFTERJM has been around a long time.  I don't remember what
version,
  but
  it was a 1.x version.
 
  Are you familiar with the setting?  It tells Declude to run
Anti-Virus
  after
  Junkmail.  It then only runs AV after checking to see if the
message is
  spam.  With the spam load these days, I would expect that to be the
  desired
  config, resulting in AV scanning on only about 10% of incoming mail
  instead
  of 100%.  However, it is not the default setting, which runs AV
first,
  then
  Junkmail.
 
  That could easily account for yours and Kathy's 70-100% CPU.
 
  Darin.
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Brian Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: declude.virus@declude.com mailto:declude.virus@declude.com
  Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 8:55 AM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
 
 
  No, I am still using antique version declude and
  imail.
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: declude.virus@declude.com mailto:declude.virus@declude.com
  Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 8:07 PM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
 
 
   Interesting that you are also seeing the 70-100% CPU with F-Prot 6,
  where
   we
   are not.
  
   Are you running AVAFTERJM?
  
   Darin.
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Brian Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: declude.virus@declude.com mailto:declude.virus@declude.com
   Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:23 AM
   Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-PROT 6 vs ClamAV SOSDG
  
  
   I just terminate my F-Prot 6, and installed ClamAV SOSDG
  
   Before that, my CPU usage is always run to skyhigh,
   at around 70%-100%,   now using ClamAV, reduce
   to 5%-20%, still catching all the testing virus.
  
   F-prot 6 do not provide option like noboot, nomem,
   I guess these become the default setting, and cause
   very high CPU and harddisk usage.
  
   Alex instruction dated at 6 June 2008 for ClamAV installation
   is very helpful, thanks!
   The main tricks in clamav are:
   1: need to install the contributors' tools, then get
   two dedicated tools for declude, can run the
   clamdscan as service.
  
   2: need to remove --mbox, if this is there, it will
   not function.
  
   Brian
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Brian Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: declude.virus@declude.com mailto:declude.virus@declude.com
   Sent: Friday, 

Re: [Declude.Virus] extracting base64 encoded files

2008-02-18 Thread Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Bonno,

This should do the trick.

http://www.fourmilab.ch/webtools/base64/

Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, 
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.





Bonno Bloksma wrote:

Hi,
 
I had some valentine mail come through which was caught as suspicious. 
However, in the end it was reported ans Unknow virus in Unknow File.
I now want to have a better look at the enclose base64 encoded card.zip. 
But... what tool to use to extract that zip file without sending it to 
my mail program. I used to be able to extract uuencoded stukk with my 
zip archive tool but... What to use for base64 encoded stuff?


Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer

tio hogeschool hospitality en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  / www.tio.nl 
http://www.tio.nl


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


--



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] Re: [Declude.Virus] IMmail 2006.23 release notes

2007-12-10 Thread Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Bonno,

After Declude finishes scanning the message it passes it off to 
smtp32.exe for delivery.  I can't think of any instance where declude 
will use the imail.exe utility.


Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, 
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.



Bonno Bloksma wrote:

Hi,
 
In the IMail 2006.23 release notes it states:

--Quote--
The IMail.exe Client provided in the IMail Server contained a 
vulnerability due to a boundary error when processing emails with 
multipart MIME data, which could potentially compromise a user's system.
 
IMail.exe will no longer be delivered during installation.
 
Caution: It is recommended that existing installations remove IMail.exe 
from the IMail directory. It has been determined that utilizing this 
feature could potentially corrupt mailboxes.

--Quote--
 
I seem to remember Declude used this (IMail.exe) as part of it's mail 
delivery. Is that still true with the 4.x versions
 
I use it to send myself mails when something happens like a sniffer 
update. But that is just one script which I can change.

Is there something similar that we can use?
 
p.s. I assume they mean IMail1 as there is no IMail.exe in the IMail 
directory.
 
 


Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer

tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  / www.tio.nl 
http://www.tio.nl/

- Original Message -
*From:* Tom Lewis mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Monday, December 10, 2007 2:28 PM
*Subject:* RE: [IMail Forum] apimmdd.txt files

The api/mmdd/.txt files are new in 9.23. There is informational logging 
taking place that is creating these logs. They can be used by tech 
support for diagnosing problems in the web client if they were to occur.
 
You can get to the release notes here: 
http://docs.ipswitch.com/IMail2006.23/ImailRelNotes/index.htm
 
Tom Lewis

*Ipswitch, Inc.*
Development Manager - Messaging Products
706-312-3573
 



*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Bonno Bloksma

*Sent:* Monday, December 10, 2007 7:27 AM
*To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Subject:* [IMail Forum] apimmdd.txt files

Hi,
 
As of IMail 2006.23 I have apimmdd.txt logfiles. However I cannot find 
what these are for. Is this the new extra debugging for the webmail?

There seem to be no release notes for 2006.23, at least I cannot find them.
 
Appart from that, everything seems to be working ok.


Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer

tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  / www.tio.nl 
http://www.tio.nl


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


--



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] IMmail 2006.23 release notes

2007-12-10 Thread Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Bonno,

After Declude finishes scanning the message it passes it off to 
smtp32.exe for delivery.  I can't think of any instance where declude 
will use the imail.exe utility.


Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, 
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.



Bonno Bloksma wrote:

Hi,
 
In the IMail 2006.23 release notes it states:

--Quote--
The IMail.exe Client provided in the IMail Server contained a 
vulnerability due to a boundary error when processing emails with 
multipart MIME data, which could potentially compromise a user's system.
 
IMail.exe will no longer be delivered during installation.
 
Caution: It is recommended that existing installations remove IMail.exe 
from the IMail directory. It has been determined that utilizing this 
feature could potentially corrupt mailboxes.

--Quote--
 
I seem to remember Declude used this (IMail.exe) as part of it's mail 
delivery. Is that still true with the 4.x versions
 
I use it to send myself mails when something happens like a sniffer 
update. But that is just one script which I can change.

Is there something similar that we can use?
 
p.s. I assume they mean IMail1 as there is no IMail.exe in the IMail 
directory.
 
 


Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer

tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  / www.tio.nl 
http://www.tio.nl/

- Original Message -
*From:* Tom Lewis mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Monday, December 10, 2007 2:28 PM
*Subject:* RE: [IMail Forum] apimmdd.txt files

The api/mmdd/.txt files are new in 9.23. There is informational logging 
taking place that is creating these logs. They can be used by tech 
support for diagnosing problems in the web client if they were to occur.
 
You can get to the release notes here: 
http://docs.ipswitch.com/IMail2006.23/ImailRelNotes/index.htm
 
Tom Lewis

*Ipswitch, Inc.*
Development Manager - Messaging Products
706-312-3573
 



*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Bonno Bloksma

*Sent:* Monday, December 10, 2007 7:27 AM
*To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Subject:* [IMail Forum] apimmdd.txt files

Hi,
 
As of IMail 2006.23 I have apimmdd.txt logfiles. However I cannot find 
what these are for. Is this the new extra debugging for the webmail?

There seem to be no release notes for 2006.23, at least I cannot find them.
 
Appart from that, everything seems to be working ok.


Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer

tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  / www.tio.nl 
http://www.tio.nl


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


--



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] False Positive ClamAV

2007-05-21 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Are you sure CLAMAV is hitting on this or is this a hit from the SANE phish 
database being used with CLAM?

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail.  
IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Bonno Bloksma 
  To: Declude.Virus@declude.com 
  Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 7:09 AM
  Subject: [Declude.Virus] False Positive ClamAV


  Hi,

  Some of our mail is getting caught bij ClamAV. I've had two reports on two 
completely unrelated mails.

  Body of message generated response:
  554 5.7.1 virus Email.Phishing.RB-882 detected by ClamAV - 
http://www.clamav.net

  I submitted a virus http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi tagging it as a false 
positive report. When I hit Submit I get an error stating this virus is already 
known and I should fix something in the submission. :-(

  Can anyone tell me:
  1) Whether this is normail behaviour for that page?
  2) Where I can report this bug in the webpage? It's not a bug in the program 
so I don't think the Bugzilla page is the right place. If I need to report it 
via a mailing list, which one?
  3) How I can check whether my report was received?


  Met vriendelijke groet,
  Bonno Bloksma
  hoofd systeembeheer



  tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme 
  begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
  t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  / www.tio.nl 

  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.Virus. The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] ClamAV lstat() failed. ERROR

2007-04-25 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Gary,

In order to scan the file I am sure Declude has to append the path to the 
files to scan otherwise how would the virus scanner know what to scan?  It 
needs some type of path.  Unless possibly it sets a working directory and 
expects the scanner to scan all the files in the working directory.  I 
suspect it gets a path much like it calls an external application.  Flip 
your logs to debug what does it show?

Darrell


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 6:39 PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] ClamAV lstat() failed. ERROR


In pursuing the problem of the new worm with a password-protected RAR file, 
I found a problem with ClamAV.

I'm running the SOSDG ClamAV Windows port version 0.90.2-2 (along with 
runclamd and runclamscan).

Declude uses the following string:
C:\clamav-devel\bin\clamdscan.exe --quiet -l report.txt

If I try to use it at a command prompt, I get the lstat() failed error. If I 
type in the full path for my command string, such as
C:\clamav-devel\bin\clamdscan.exe --quiet -l C:\temp\report.txt 
C:\temp\123456789.eml

it works. The problem is that Declude scans a file in a different directory 
each time, so the path changes. So for Declude to work now, it would require 
a significant change in Declude.

But ClamAV worked before. What changed? Can it be changed back? Is this a 
problem with ClamAV in general, or just with the SOSDG Windows port? Do the 
other ClamAV ports have this problem?

Any suggestions you might have are greatly appreciated.

Gary Steiner









---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] AVG Virus updates - No updates from declude since 4/7/7

2007-04-16 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Honestly, I am not sure what all the individual files are, but here are my dates

incavi.avm - 4/15/2007
microavi.avg - 4/5/2007
miniavg.avg - 2/16/2007
avi7.avg - 2/21/2007

Howard - you can try this post from David from the Archive-
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.virus@declude.com/msg13473.html

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail.  
IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Howard Smith (N.O.R.A.D.) 
  To: declude.virus@declude.com 
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; 'David Barker' 
  Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:28 AM
  Subject: [Declude.Virus] AVG Virus updates - No updates from declude since 
4/7/7


  I have not had a virus update from decludes AVG builtin scanner since 4/6/7 , 
has any one received any later updates , or suggestions  to fix problem

   

   

  Howard Smith

  N.O.R.A.D. Inc.

  P.O. Box 680116

  Miami, Florida 33168  

  www.norad.com 

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   


  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.Virus. The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] virus via e-mail getting rare

2007-03-26 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
All and all it has been way down for me as well.  In mid 2005 I was averging 
around 100K-200K viruses a month (with AVAFTERJM).  That has been dropping and 
dropping.  In 2006 the highest for any give month I had was 22K.  This year I 
have had nothing over 2,500.  With running AVAFTERJM a lot of viruses also get 
tagged as spam.  In 2003 we averaged around 400K+ viruses per month (which 
dropped by more than half when AVAFTERJM was enabled).  Other things like 
greylisitng also helps twart viruses.  

Come to think about it I can't remember the last major virus trying to come in 
(mydoom?) that we had to deal with.

Darrell


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail.  
IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Bonno Bloksma 
  To: Declude.Virus@declude.com 
  Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 8:37 AM
  Subject: [Declude.Virus] virus via e-mail getting rare


  Hi,

  Is virus via e-mail a dying breed? There are days where I barely get any 
virusses via e-mail. Most of what get's caught is malfomed mail, 99% spam.

  I just did a test to see if my virusscanners are still working correctly, 
eicar is still being caught by both F-prot and Sophos so all seems to be 
woking. Both scanners are also correctly updating their database.


  Met vriendelijke groet,
  Bonno Bloksma
  hoofd systeembeheer



  tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme 
  begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
  t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  / www.tio.nl 

  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.Virus. The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude Upgrade on IMail - Key Trouble

2007-03-22 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bill,

It's

CODE   [PLACE YOUR DECLUDE CODE HERE]

Darrell


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message - 
From: Bill Green dfn Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 8:31 PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Declude Upgrade on IMail - Key Trouble


I've just upgraded to the 4.x suite from 3.0. I'm getting the Invalid Key
message. According to the Archives, I need to put the Key in the declude.cfg
file, but what is the correct syntax?

License Key (KEY#) ?
or
Product Key (Key#) ?
or just
Key # ?

Bill Green
dfn Systems



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude Upgrade on IMail - Key Trouble

2007-03-22 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bill,

Do you have a declude.exe and a decludeproc in your imail folder?  Do you 
have the decludeproc service in services?  Do you also have a proc folder 
off of imail\spool (i.e. imail\spool\proc).  Are files starting to be 
deposited into the proc folder?

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.

- Original Message - 
From: Bill Green dfn Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude Upgrade on IMail - Key Trouble


Is there an actual set of instructions for a Declude Upgrade for IMail? The
Declude site lists Installation Instructions, but they are for SmarterMail.
The Knowledge Base is no help. Declude Support has gone Home. My Upgrade has
gone horribly wrong and I now seem to have a hybrid monster.

Bill Green
dfn Systems

- Original Message - 
From: Bill Green dfn Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 6:31 PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Declude Upgrade on IMail - Key Trouble


 I've just upgraded to the 4.x suite from 3.0. I'm getting the Invalid Key
 message. According to the Archives, I need to put the Key in the
 declude.cfg file, but what is the correct syntax?

 License Key (KEY#) ?
 or
 Product Key (Key#) ?
 or just
 Key # ?

 Bill Green
 dfn Systems


 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude Upgrade on IMail - Key Trouble

2007-03-22 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bill,

The Imail\Declude folder is the one that matters.  What are you getting in 
your logs?

Darrell


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message - 
From: Bill Green dfn Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude Upgrade on IMail - Key Trouble


Thanks Darrell,

I put it in both declude.cfg files. I now have two. One in the
IMail\Decude Folder, and one in the Program Files\Declude Folder. I'm not
sure which one is working right now.

Bill Green
dfn Systems


- Original Message - 
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude Upgrade on IMail - Key Trouble


 Bill,

 It's

 CODE   [PLACE YOUR DECLUDE CODE HERE]

 Darrell

 
 Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
 Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration,
 MRTG
 Integration, and Log Parsers.
 - Original Message - 
 From: Bill Green dfn Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: declude.virus@declude.com
 Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 8:31 PM
 Subject: [Declude.Virus] Declude Upgrade on IMail - Key Trouble


 I've just upgraded to the 4.x suite from 3.0. I'm getting the Invalid Key
 message. According to the Archives, I need to put the Key in the
 declude.cfg
 file, but what is the correct syntax?

 License Key (KEY#) ?
 or
 Product Key (Key#) ?
 or just
 Key # ?

 Bill Green
 dfn Systems



 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.




 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.Virus] DLAnalyzer 5.2.1 Released

2007-03-09 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
DLAnalyzer 5.2.0 has been released.

DLAnalyzer is a comprehensive reporting tool that integrates both Junkmail
and Virus statistics into one report. Some of the features require the
Enterprise or Standard version, but we also have a FREE LITE version
available.

Report Samples: http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/reportsamples.htm
Release Notes: http://www.invariantsystems.com/download/current/readme.txt
Download: http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/download.aspx

Any questions let me know,
Darrell


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG
Integration, and Log Parsers.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] DLAnalyzer 5.2.1 Released

2007-03-09 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
DLAnalyzer 5.2.0 has been released.

DLAnalyzer is a comprehensive reporting tool that integrates both Junkmail
and Virus statistics into one report. Some of the features require the
Enterprise or Standard version, but we also have a FREE LITE version
available.

Report Samples: http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/reportsamples.htm
Release Notes: http://www.invariantsystems.com/download/current/readme.txt
Download: http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/download.aspx

Any questions let me know,
Darrell


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG
Integration, and Log Parsers.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] Clam AV vs. AVG vs. McAfee

2007-03-06 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Wolf,

I use McAfee, CLAM, Internal AVG, and at one time (before licensing changes) 
F-Prot all at the same time.  If you have extra CPU there is no reason not to 
use multiple scanners.  One thing though when I switched to processing AV last 
I seen a dramatic drop in viruses due to them being caught as spam.  50-60K a 
month down to less than 2K.  FWIW - I have McAfee as my last scanner and every 
now and than I see it grab a few viruses that the others miss.

Darrell


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail.  
IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Wolf Tombe 
  To: declude.virus@declude.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 10:16 AM
  Subject: [Declude.Virus] Clam AV vs. AVG vs. McAfee


  The discussion on the current version of Clam AV and Clam being able to 
detect some image spam got me thinking.  Prior to Declude version 4.0, I always 
used McAfee AV to scan all incoming messages.  When I upgraded to Declude 4 I 
decided to try it's built in AV which seems to work fine.  I'm curious though 
as to the opinions of others on this list as to the merits of using Clam or 
other anti-virus scanners either in place of the Declude built in AV or in 
addition to it.

   

  Any opinions people would like to share will be appreciated.

   

  Thanks!

   

  Wolf

   

   


  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.Virus. The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Current Version of Clam AV

2007-02-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
In my normal maintenance window (once a week) all services are stopped and I 
clean out the work, error, proc, spool, and review folders.  Since I stop 
CLAMAV as well I am able to delete those directories.

Darrell


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail.  
IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Stephan 
  To: declude.virus@declude.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 11:22 AM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Current Version of Clam AV


  Thanks for responding. I can't delete them until I restart the ClamAV 
service. Do you have a way of automatically deleting them, or do you schedule a 
task to restart ClamAV and then delete them? I tried using a schedule task but 
for some reason they still don't get deleted (but it's possible to do it 
manually.)

  -Original Message-
  From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent 2/27/2007 10:17:46 AM
  To: declude.virus@declude.com
  Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Current Version of Clam AV

   
  FWIW - I have always had left over directories from .84 on up.

  Darrell
  
  Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message - 
From: Stephan 
To: declude.virus@declude.com 
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Current Version of Clam AV


I am also running the 0.90-1, and it's working fine, except I still get 
leftover .vir directories inside the declude/proc dir. The error in the clamav 
log shows:
- d:\imail\spool\proc\work\d716a0~1.vir\/0: Unable to create temporary 
directory ERROR
I've tried checking permissions, and made sure I have the clamav tmpdir 
variable set to my clamav tmp dir (which fixed a similar error that stopped the 
clamav service from starting.) But I haven't been able to fix this one. Anyone 
know how to fix this error?
Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent 2/26/2007 1:30:43 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Current Version of Clam AV


Gary,

I upgraded on Friday and have not ran into any issues.

Darrell


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.

- Original Message - 
From: Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Current Version of Clam AV


I see that SOSDG released a new version (0.90-1) of their Windows port of 
ClamAV on 02-22-2007.

http://www.sosdg.org/clamav-win32/

Has anyone upgraded to it yet?  Any problems?

Gary Steiner



 Original Message 
 From: Mark Reimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 2:04 PM
 To: declude.virus@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Current Version of Clam AV

 Clam AV releases prior to 0.90 have Dos issues I believe. Is their a 0.90
 release for windows?



 Mark Reimer

 IT System Admin

 American CareSource

 972-308-6887



   _

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
 Reimer
 Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 10:06 AM
 To: declude.virus@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.Virus] Current Version of Clam AV



 What is the current release of Clam AV for windows? I saw 0.90 stable is 
 out
 now.



 Mark Reimer

 IT System Admin

 American CareSource

 972-308-6887









---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.Virus. The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com. 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.Virus

Re: [Declude.Virus] Current Version of Clam AV

2007-02-26 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Gary,

I upgraded on Friday and have not ran into any issues.

Darrell


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.

- Original Message - 
From: Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Current Version of Clam AV


I see that SOSDG released a new version (0.90-1) of their Windows port of 
ClamAV on 02-22-2007.

http://www.sosdg.org/clamav-win32/

Has anyone upgraded to it yet?  Any problems?

Gary Steiner



 Original Message 
 From: Mark Reimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 2:04 PM
 To: declude.virus@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Current Version of Clam AV

 Clam AV releases prior to 0.90 have Dos issues I believe. Is their a 0.90
 release for windows?



 Mark Reimer

 IT System Admin

 American CareSource

 972-308-6887



   _

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
 Reimer
 Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 10:06 AM
 To: declude.virus@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.Virus] Current Version of Clam AV



 What is the current release of Clam AV for windows? I saw 0.90 stable is 
 out
 now.



 Mark Reimer

 IT System Admin

 American CareSource

 972-308-6887









---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] How to block an IP

2006-12-26 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Joe,

Just add the IP or CIDR block into the SMTP access control in Imail.

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.

- Original Message - 
From: J Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Sent: Monday, December 25, 2006 11:06 PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] How to block an IP


Is there a way to block an IP address before analysis by Declude's AV (Ver
1.82 - Imail 8.x)?

I thought I should be able to do this with rules.ima by looking for a line
in the header. So I have a line that says
H~xxx\.yyy\.zz\.
but it doesn't work. (In case you can't see it, the lines read \. = slash
dot per Ipswitch docs) I don't think the H~ (header contains) command reads
everything in the header.

~Joe



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.Virus] ClamAV, BitDefender, Symantec, Trend, Sophos

2006-12-19 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
FYI - List of AV Vulns that were listed in the SANS Vulnerability Alert that 
affect most of us one way or another.

Also, there was a McAfee vulnerability but it was for thier linux based version.

06.50.31 CVE: CVE-2006-5874

Platform: Cross Platform

Title: Clam Anti-Virus MIME Attachments Denial of Service

Description: Clam Anti-Virus (ClamAV) is an anti-virus application for Windows 
and UNIX like operating systems. It is exposed to a denial of service issue 
because it fails to handle certain file types.

Specifically, the vulnerability exists when the application processes 
base64-encoded MIME attachments. This results in a NULL pointer dereference 
crashing the affected application. ClamAV versions prior to 0.88.4-2 are 
affected.

Ref: http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/453968

MODERATE: BitDefender PE File Parsing Engine Integer Overflow

Affected:

BitDefender Antivirus and Antivirus Plus BitDefender for ISA Server and MS 
Exchange BitDefender Internet Security BitDefender Mail Protection for 
Enterprises BitDefender Online Scanner

Description: Multiple BitDefender products are vulnerable to an integer 
overflow in parsing packed PE (Portable Executable) files. Portable Executable 
files are the standard executable format on Microsoft Windows systems. Failure 
to properly handle certain malformed packed PE files can lead to an integer 
overflow and arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the scanning 
process.

Status: BitDefender confirmed, updates available. According to BitDefender's 
website, the update was distributed immediately via BitDefender's automatic 
update system, and no user interaction is required to install the update.

References:

BitDefender Security Advisory

http://www.bitdefender.com/KB323-en--cevakrnl.xmd-vulnerability.html

(11) Symantec Antivirus Big Yellow/Sagevo Worm

Description: eEye researchers have discovered a new worm that is exploiting a 
buffer overflow vulnerability in the Symantec Antivirus and Client Security 
software. The overflow being exploited by the Big Yellow/Sagevo worm was 
patched by Symantec in May 2006. Enterprises using Symantec AV or Client 
Security software should apply the patch immediately if they have not done so 
already. In addition, blocking access to the port 2967/tcp at the network 
perimeter will prevent any attacks originating from the Internet.

References:

eEye's Analysis of Worm Binary

http://research.eeye.com/html/alerts/AL20061215.html

Symantec's Worm Analysis

http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2006-121309-3331-99tabid=2

06.50.14 CVE: CVE-2006-5645

Platform: Third Party Windows Apps

Title: Multiple Trend Micro Antivirus RAR Archive Remote Denial of Service

Description: Trend Micro provides antivirus and software security applications. 
These applications are exposed to remote denial of service issues because they 
fail to properly handle file types, resulting in excessive consumption of 
system resources. Trend Micro Server Protect version 5.58, Trend Micro PC 
Cillin - Internet Security

2006 and Trend Micro Office Scan version 7.3 are affected.

Ref: http://www.trendmicro.com/en/home/us/home.htm

CRITICAL: Sophos Anti-Virus Multiple Vulnerabilities

Affected:

Sophos products with a scanning engine version prior to 2.40

Description: Sophos Anti-Virus contains multiple buffer overflows in parsing 
CPIO and SIT archives. CPIO is a common archive format used primarily on Unix 
and Unix-like systems, and SIT is a common archive format used primarily on 
Apple Macintosh systems. A specially-crafted CPIO or SIT archive scanned by 
Sophos could exploit these buffer overflows and execute arbitrary code with the 
privileges of the scanning process. Some technical details for these 
vulnerabilities are publicly available.

Status: Sophos confirmed, updates available.

References:

Sophos Knowledge Base Article

http://www.sophos.com/support/knowledgebase/article/17340.html




Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail.  
IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] DLAnalyzer 5.2.0 Released

2006-11-16 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
DLAnalyzer 5.2.0 has been released.

DLAnalyzer is a comprehensive reporting tool that integrates both Junkmail 
and Virus statistics into one report. Some of the features require the 
Enterprise or Standard version, but we also have a FREE LITE version 
available.

New:
  * Compatible with the log changes in Declude 4.3.x
  * Fully Implements Zerohour reporting (Virus and Junkmail).
  * Requires the .Net 2.0 Framework

Report Samples: http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/reportsamples.htm
Release Notes: http://www.invariantsystems.com/download/current/readme.txt
Download: http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/download.aspx

Any questions let me know,
Darrell


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.Virus] DLAnalyzer 5.2.0 Released

2006-11-16 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
DLAnalyzer 5.2.0 has been released.

DLAnalyzer is a comprehensive reporting tool that integrates both Junkmail 
and Virus statistics into one report. Some of the features require the 
Enterprise or Standard version, but we also have a FREE LITE version 
available.

New:
  * Compatible with the log changes in Declude 4.3.x
  * Fully Implements Zerohour reporting (Virus and Junkmail).
  * Requires the .Net 2.0 Framework

Report Samples: http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/reportsamples.htm
Release Notes: http://www.invariantsystems.com/download/current/readme.txt
Download: http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/download.aspx

Any questions let me know,
Darrell


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] RE: Differences in reporting of ClamAV And ClamWin.

2006-10-26 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Eddie,

You do not need to run clamav twice to detect both phish and viruses.  If 
you put the phish.ndb into the same directory as the clam db it will also 
use that.

Also, for me to get the virus name I had to use the wrapper.

This snippett below is from Scott Fisher who helped me get mine going.
I use this version of the cygwin clam
http://www.sosdg.org/clamav-win32/index.php

I use Terri Fitts's runclamscan wrapper and runclamd service:
http://www.smartbusiness.com/imail/declude/


Here is my virus.cfg entry
#
#  Clam A/V
#
#  Runclamscan log levels
#   log=0 (no logging)
#   log=1 (minimal logging only date, time, elapsed times, viruses)
#   log=2 (log all messages same as 1)
#   log=3 (debug log - whole bunch of stuff - multiple lines)
#
SCANFILE2 d:\imail\declude\runclamscan.exe log=1
C:\clamav-devel\bin\clamdscan.exe --quiet --mbox --max-ratio 0 --max-space
1M -l report.txt
VIRUSCODE2 1
REPORT2 FOUND

Hope this helps,
Darrell


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.

- Original Message - 
From: Eddie Pang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:43 AM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] RE: Differences in reporting of ClamAV And ClamWin.


Hi All,

I am stumpted.

I am trying to run ClamAV to take advantage of clamdscan.exe for speed and
performance, but I am unable to gather statistics for use with DLAnalyzer.

Looking closer at the logs, I find a slight variation between the 2
products.  ClamWin reports the phish/virus on the same line as virus=.
However with ClamAV, the Virus= is blank, and the phish/virus is on the next
line.

ClamAV is from www.sosdg.org version 0.88.4-1, and ClamWin is from
www.clamwin.net version 0.88.5.

Any suggestions to ClamAV (Scanner3) would be greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Eddie.

=
SCANFILE2 C:\imail\declude\runclamscan.exe log=2
c:\Progra~1\clamwin\bin\clamscan.exe --verbose
--database=C:\Docume~1\Alluse~1\.clamwin\db --tempdir=c:\temp
--no-summary --max-ratio 0 -l report.txt
VIRUSCODE2 1
REPORT2 FOUND
#
SCANFILE3 C:\imail\declude\runclamscan.exe log=2
C:\clamav-devel\bin\clamdscan.exe --quiet --log-verbose --no-summary
--max-ratio 0 -l report.txt
VIRUSCODE3 1
REPORT3 FOUND
==
10/25/2006 19:07:52.875 q4148041a01064bf4.smd Virus scanner 2 reports exit
code of 1
10/25/2006 19:07:52.875 q4148041a01064bf4.smd Scanner 2: Virus=
Html.Phishing.Rock.Sanesecurity.06050500 Attachment= [14] O

10/25/2006 19:07:59.578 q4148041a01064bf4.smd Virus scanner 3 reports exit
code of 1
10/25/2006 19:07:59.578 q4148041a01064bf4.smd Scanner 3: Virus=  Attachment=
[14] O
10/25/2006 19:07:59.578 q4148041a01064bf4.smd File(s) are INFECTED [
Html.Phishing.Rock.Sanesecurity.06050500: 1]
==




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] Bug in mismatched extensions causes backscatter on spam

2006-10-02 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Matt,

I agree with everyone of your points - My intent 
was to bring it up that I had reported this issue up a long time ago as I also 
thought that what was happening was undesirable. However, at the time 
Scott did not feel this was a bug. However, times change and back scatter 
is a huge issue. Maybe thats enough now to convince for an alteration of 
behavior. As my preference would be to handle mismatched exe's as its own 
class of which I would not send bannotify messages for.

Darrell
Check 
out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Matt 
  To: declude.virus@declude.com 
  Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 8:24 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Bug in 
  mismatched extensions causes backscatter on spam
  Darrell,I'm sure that it is desirable to block (when 
  the detection isn't erroring), however having this handled as if it was an EXE 
  when it comes to the bannotify.eml is problematic. Backscatter can get 
  you blacklisted, not to mention it is annoying to get such things for forged 
  E-mail.I have Virus running after JunkMail and still I have bounced a 
  dozen of these today alone (which excludes messages that reached my DELETE 
  weight). For those that run JunkMail before Virus (the default), that 
  number could be in the hundreds or thousands depending on volume since this 
  comes from a major zombie spammer. I'm guessing that most are bouncing 
  EXE's that aren't detected as viruses.To check this, just search your 
  Virus log for "mismatched.exe".The behavior needs to be changed so 
  that this doesn't trigger bannotify.eml bounces. I am testing using 
  "SKIPIFEXT mismatched.exe" in my bannotify.eml to see if that helps, but this 
  should not bounce such messages by default as if they were EXE's. It 
  makes sense to give it a unique extension for these conditions and let us 
  determine what to do with them instead of lumping it together with actions for 
  EXE's.MattDarrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
  wrote: 
  



I brought this up to Scott several years ago - 
and he said this is not a bug but a by design issue.He explained a 
scenario why this was important and I understood based on the explantion but 
for the life of me I can't remember the scenario.
Darrell

Check 
out http://www.invariantsystems.com 
for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue 
Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

  - 
  Original Message - 
  From: 
  Matt 
  
  To: 
  declude.virus@declude.com 
  
  Sent: 
  Sunday, October 01, 2006 3:33 PM
  Subject: 
  [Declude.Virus] Bug in mismatched extensions causes backscatter on 
  spam
  I just found this bug. Essentially, if the MIME 
  headers for an attachment are mismatched, Declude "assumes" that it is an 
  EXE for virus scanning purposes, and this causes EXE triggers such as 
  bannotify.eml to be triggered. This is especially bad since it is 
  happening fairly commonly on zombie spam.For example, here are the 
  MIME headers from the spam sample:
  Content-Type: 
image/jpeg;name="smoky.1.jpg"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 
base64Content-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Content-Disposition: 
inline;filename="smoky.1.gi"You will note the 
  Content-Type being image/jpeg and the file extension being "gi". 
  Here is what Declude Virus finds:
  10/01/2006 14:03:44.656 q02f8014a9ecc.smd Vulnerability 
flags = 86310/01/2006 14:03:44.671 q02f8014a9ecc.smd MIME file: 
[text/html][7bit; Length=590 Checksum=51800]10/01/2006 14:03:44.671 
q02f8014a9ecc.smd Found file with mismatched extensions 
[smoky.1.jpg-smoky.1.gi]; assuming .exe10/01/2006 14:03:44.671 
q02f8014a9ecc.smd MIME file: mismatched.exe [base64; Length=25644 
Checksum=3233585]10/01/2006 14:03:44.671 q02f8014a9ecc.smd 
Banning file with EXE extension [image/jpeg].10/01/2006 14:03:44.890 
q02f8014a9ecc.smd Virus scanner 1 reports exit code of 
010/01/2006 14:03:45.421 q02f8014a9ecc.smd Virus scanner 2 
reports exit code of 010/01/2006 14:03:45.421 q02f8014a9ecc.smd 
Scanned: Banned file extension. [Prescan OK][MIME: 2 
26380]10/01/2006 14:03:45.437 q02f8014a9ecc.smd From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[outgoing from 62.161.108.7]10/01/2006 14:03:45.437 
q02f8014a9ecc.smd Subject: Re: diagnostician dullThis 
  is clearly not desirable behavior, and I have run into a related bug 
  previously (that was previously 

Re: [Declude.Virus] Bug in mismatched extensions causes backscatter on spam

2006-10-01 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])



I brought this up to Scott several years ago - and 
he said this is not a bug but a by design issue.He explained a scenario 
why this was important and I understood based on the explantion but for the life 
of me I can't remember the scenario.
Darrell

Check 
out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Matt 
  To: declude.virus@declude.com 
  Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 3:33 
  PM
  Subject: [Declude.Virus] Bug in 
  mismatched extensions causes backscatter on spam
  I just found this bug. Essentially, if the MIME headers 
  for an attachment are mismatched, Declude "assumes" that it is an EXE for 
  virus scanning purposes, and this causes EXE triggers such as bannotify.eml to 
  be triggered. This is especially bad since it is happening fairly 
  commonly on zombie spam.For example, here are the MIME headers from 
  the spam sample:
  Content-Type: 
image/jpeg;name="smoky.1.jpg"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 
base64Content-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Content-Disposition: 
inline;filename="smoky.1.gi"You will note the 
  Content-Type being image/jpeg and the file extension being "gi". Here is 
  what Declude Virus finds:
  10/01/2006 14:03:44.656 q02f8014a9ecc.smd Vulnerability 
flags = 86310/01/2006 14:03:44.671 q02f8014a9ecc.smd MIME file: 
[text/html][7bit; Length=590 Checksum=51800]10/01/2006 14:03:44.671 
q02f8014a9ecc.smd Found file with mismatched extensions 
[smoky.1.jpg-smoky.1.gi]; assuming .exe10/01/2006 14:03:44.671 
q02f8014a9ecc.smd MIME file: mismatched.exe [base64; Length=25644 
Checksum=3233585]10/01/2006 14:03:44.671 q02f8014a9ecc.smd Banning 
file with EXE extension [image/jpeg].10/01/2006 14:03:44.890 
q02f8014a9ecc.smd Virus scanner 1 reports exit code of 010/01/2006 
14:03:45.421 q02f8014a9ecc.smd Virus scanner 2 reports exit code of 
010/01/2006 14:03:45.421 q02f8014a9ecc.smd Scanned: Banned file 
extension. [Prescan OK][MIME: 2 26380]10/01/2006 14:03:45.437 
q02f8014a9ecc.smd From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [outgoing 
from 62.161.108.7]10/01/2006 14:03:45.437 q02f8014a9ecc.smd Subject: 
Re: diagnostician dullThis is clearly not desirable behavior, 
  and I have run into a related bug previously (that was previously reported) 
  where a filename that spans two lines (which is RFC compliant when 'folded') 
  will be treated as an EXE and bounced if you are bouncing non-virus 
  EXE's.It is absolutely necessary to allow for bannotify.eml bouncing 
  of messages with EXE extensions because they are commonly received 
  legitimately regardless of whether they are allowed or not, but to have EXE be 
  the assumed extension at the same time causes a lot of different issues. 
  Because of this, I would strongly suggest that Declude assume a different 
  extension when necessary, such as "unknown" so that we can configure Declude 
  Virus to handle "unknown" files in a different way. We could choose for 
  instance to block them, but not bounce 
  them.Thanks,Matt---This E-mail came from the 
  Declude.Virus mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.Virus". The archives 
  can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.

---This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] Fw: A secret e-card has been sent fot you!!

2006-09-29 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Pretty nice peice of social engineering below - how 
many of your users will click on this tomorrow :) Who can resist the 
temptation of a "secret" greeting card.

The link actually takes you to 
http://www.lkkm.cz/help/postcard.gif.exe

Darrell
Check 
out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

- Original Message - 
From: e-greetings.com 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 10:20 PM
Subject: A secret e-card has been sent fot you!!

Hello friend !A friend has sent you an ecard from 
e-greetings.comSend free ecards from e-greetings.com with your choice of 
colors, words and music.Your ecard will be available with us for the 
next 10 days. If you wish to keep the greeting longer, you may save it on your 
computer or take a print.To view your ecard, click on the following 
Internet address.http://www.e-greetings.com/view.php?sid=1246 
Hope you will visit us,e-greetings.com 

---This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] CLAMAV - 88.3-1 - 7/11/2006 Release

2006-07-30 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I noticed a new build from the SOSDG group has been released (88.3-1).
http://www.sosdg.org/clamav-win32/index.php

Anyone running it yet?

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] Invalid file types triggering on an invalid file type

2006-07-18 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])



What version are you running Matt in version 
3.0.5.20they fixed a ms-tnef issue with winmail.dat.

This might be the issue you are 
seeing.
Darrell
Check 
out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Matt 
  To: declude.virus@declude.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 7:48 
PM
  Subject: [Declude.Virus] Invalid file 
  types triggering on an invalid file type
  I found a message blocked for an "Invalid ZIP Vulnerability", 
  but it doesn't have a zip attachment. The only attachment on this 
  message is a winmail.dat. While that winmail.dat file clearly contains 
  data of some sort, I am pretty certain that it is triggering vulnerabilities 
  inappropriately, and I am positive that this message was not a 
  virus.My Declude Virus logs are showing both the Invalid ZIP 
  Vulnerability and a bogus .jpg file. I would like to turn this detection 
  off. Is there a switch to turn off this detection?Detail 
  follows:
  HEADERS FROM THE SINGLE 
ATTACHMENT=--=_NextPart_000_0056_01C6A9CF.4BDDA860Content-Type: 
application/ms-tnef; 
name="winmail.dat"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 
base64Content-Disposition: attachment; 
filename="winmail.dat"VIRUS LOG 
ENTRIES=07/17/2006 
06:32:40.488 q674000a2e465.smd Vulnerability flags = 86207/17/2006 
06:32:40.566 q674000a2e465.smd MIME file: winmail.dat [base64; 
Length=2312012 Checksum=33270092]07/17/2006 06:32:40.800 
q674000a2e465.smd Virus scanner 1 reports exit code of 007/17/2006 
06:32:41.253 q674000a2e465.smd Virus scanner 2 reports exit code of 
007/17/2006 06:32:41.253 q674000a2e465.smd Found a bogus .jpg 
file07/17/2006 06:32:41.253 q674000a2e465.smd Invalid ZIP 
Vulnerability07/17/2006 06:32:41.253 q674000a2e465.smd Found a bogus 
.Zip file07/17/2006 06:32:41.253 q674000a2e465.smd File(s) are 
INFECTED [[Invalid ZIP Vulnerability]: 0]07/17/2006 06:32:41.253 
q674000a2e465.smd Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS [MIME: 7 
2314810]07/17/2006 06:32:41.269 q674000a2e465.smd From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [outgoing from 
##.##.48.210]07/17/2006 06:32:41.269 q674000a2e465.smd Subject: FW: 
M341092022 / 
  M341092023Thanks,Matt---This 
  E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send 
  an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.Virus". 
  The archives can be foundat 
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] 4.2.20 Error in Log

2006-07-13 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Andy, 

Besides AVG I have 3 scanners: listed in order (F-Prot, Clam AV, McAfee). 

I do think its an AVG issue like you suggested.  I am trying to find a way 
to disable the built in AVG virus scanner to see if this message goes away. 

Darrell 

Andy Schmidt writes: 

Do you have a second/external scanner defined. 


May be the internal scanner (AVG) deletes an attachment and then Declude
complains that its gone when it tries to launch the secondary? 


Best Regards
Andy Schmidt 


Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206  

 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 05:46 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.Virus] 4.2.20 Error in Log 



Since upgrading to 4.2.20 I started seeing the following error:  

07/12/2006 00:34:41.812 q7bca020f6715.smd 1 [1 of 2 not deleted] files 
were deleted.  You should not use an on-access virus scanner that scans the 
\IMail directory or sub-directories.07/12/2006 00:34:41.328  

This only happens when AVG catches a virus.  It did not get logged under 3.x 

version.  Nor do I have an On Access Virus Scanner.  Anyone else seeing 
this?  

Darrell  

See the log snippet below.  


07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 q7bca020f6715.smd Vulnerability flags = 0
07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 q7bca020f6715.smd MIME file: [text/html][7bit; 
Length=733 Checksum=67160]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 q7bca020f6715.smd MIME file: email-details.zip 
[base64; Length=108312 Checksum=13182423]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.781 q7bca020f6715.smd AVG Reports VIRUS: 
IRC/BackDoor.SdBot.PMS
07/12/2006 00:34:41.781 q7bca020f6715.smd File(s) are INFECTED 
[IRC/BackDoor.SdBot.PMS: 7]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.812 q7bca020f6715.smd 1 [1 of 2 not deleted] files 
were deleted.  You should not use an on-access virus scanner that scans the 
\IMail directory or sub-directories.07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 
q7bca020f6715.smd Vulnerability flags = 0
07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 q7bca020f6715.smd MIME file: [text/html][7bit; 
Length=733 Checksum=67160]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 q7bca020f6715.smd MIME file: email-details.zip 
[base64; Length=108312 Checksum=13182423]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.781 q7bca020f6715.smd AVG Reports VIRUS: 
IRC/BackDoor.SdBot.PMS
07/12/2006 00:34:41.781 q7bca020f6715.smd File(s) are INFECTED 
[IRC/BackDoor.SdBot.PMS: 7]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.812 q7bca020f6715.smd 1 [1 of 2 not deleted] files 
were deleted.  You should not use an on-access virus scanner that scans the 
\IMail directory or sub-directories.  

Darrell  


 ---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, 
mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, just
send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 





---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, 
mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] 4.2.20 Missing File Error in Log

2006-07-13 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
After testing with AVG off it appears that the error about the missing file 
only occurs when AVG is on.  With AVG disabled I get no error messages.  
Here is the relevant log info. 

I have confirmed this is an AVG issue.  With AVG on I get the error with AVG 
off I do not get the error. 

Darrell 


WITHOUT AVG ON
F:\Logs\Virusgrep -i q4ae100a56d71.smd vir0713.log
07/13/2006 09:30:16.468 q4ae100a56d71.smd Vulnerability flags = 0
07/13/2006 09:30:16.468 q4ae100a56d71.smd MIME file: [text/html][7bit; 
Length=126 Checksum=10064]
07/13/2006 09:30:16.468 q4ae100a56d71.smd MIME file: tyjguozxgx.gif 
[base64; Length=1137 Checksum=127847]
07/13/2006 09:30:16.484 q4ae100a56d71.smd MIME file: Dorothy.zip 
[base64; Length=84731 Checksum=10789144]

07/13/2006 09:30:16.484 q4ae100a56d71.smd Found encrypted .ZIP file
07/13/2006 09:30:16.484 q4ae100a56d71.smd Banning .ZIP file with 
encrypted exe extension.
07/13/2006 09:30:16.703 q4ae100a56d71.smd Virus scanner 1 reports exit 
code of 8
07/13/2006 09:30:16.703 q4ae100a56d71.smd Could not find parse string 
Infection: in report.txt

07/13/2006 09:30:16.703 q4ae100a56d71.smd File(s) are INFECTED [: 8]
07/13/2006 09:30:16.703 q4ae100a56d71.smd Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS 
[Prescan OK][MIME: 3 86092] 


WITH AVG ON:
F:\Logs\Virusgrep -i q11e2008d1156.smd vir0713.log
07/13/2006 05:27:06.312 q11e2008d1156.smd Vulnerability flags = 0
07/13/2006 05:27:06.312 q11e2008d1156.smd MIME file: [text/html][7bit; 
Length=414 Checksum=37647]
07/13/2006 05:27:06.312 q11e2008d1156.smd MIME file: account-details.zip 
[base64; Length=108316 Checksum=1

3182509]
07/13/2006 05:27:06.828 q11e2008d1156.smd AVG Reports VIRUS: 
IRC/BackDoor.SdBot.PMS
07/13/2006 05:27:06.828 q11e2008d1156.smd File(s) are INFECTED 
[IRC/BackDoor.SdBot.PMS: 7]
07/13/2006 05:27:06.859 q11e2008d1156.smd 1 [1 of 2 not deleted] files 
were deleted.  You should not use a
n on-access virus scanner that scans the \IMail directory or 
sub-directories.
07/13/2006 05:27:06.859 q11e2008d1156.smd Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS 
[Prescan OK][MIME: 2 108872] 

Darrell 

Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes: 

Andy,  

Besides AVG I have 3 scanners: listed in order (F-Prot, Clam AV, McAfee).  

I do think its an AVG issue like you suggested.  I am trying to find a way 
to disable the built in AVG virus scanner to see if this message goes 
away.  

Darrell  

Andy Schmidt writes:  

Do you have a second/external scanner defined.  


May be the internal scanner (AVG) deletes an attachment and then Declude
complains that its gone when it tries to launch the secondary?  


Best Regards
Andy Schmidt  


Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206   

  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Darrell

([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 05:46 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.Virus] 4.2.20 Error in Log  



Since upgrading to 4.2.20 I started seeing the following error:   

07/12/2006 00:34:41.812 q7bca020f6715.smd 1 [1 of 2 not deleted] 
files were deleted.  You should not use an on-access virus scanner that 
scans the \IMail directory or sub-directories.07/12/2006 00:34:41.328   

This only happens when AVG catches a virus.  It did not get logged under 
3.x  

version.  Nor do I have an On Access Virus Scanner.  Anyone else seeing 
this?   

Darrell   

See the log snippet below.   


07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 q7bca020f6715.smd Vulnerability flags = 0
07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 q7bca020f6715.smd MIME file: 
[text/html][7bit; Length=733 Checksum=67160]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 q7bca020f6715.smd MIME file: 
email-details.zip [base64; Length=108312 Checksum=13182423]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.781 q7bca020f6715.smd AVG Reports VIRUS: 
IRC/BackDoor.SdBot.PMS
07/12/2006 00:34:41.781 q7bca020f6715.smd File(s) are INFECTED 
[IRC/BackDoor.SdBot.PMS: 7]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.812 q7bca020f6715.smd 1 [1 of 2 not deleted] 
files were deleted.  You should not use an on-access virus scanner that 
scans the \IMail directory or sub-directories.07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 
q7bca020f6715.smd Vulnerability flags = 0
07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 q7bca020f6715.smd MIME file: 
[text/html][7bit; Length=733 Checksum=67160]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 q7bca020f6715.smd MIME file: 
email-details.zip [base64; Length=108312 Checksum=13182423]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.781 q7bca020f6715.smd AVG Reports VIRUS: 
IRC/BackDoor.SdBot.PMS
07/12/2006 00:34:41.781 q7bca020f6715.smd File(s) are INFECTED 
[IRC/BackDoor.SdBot.PMS: 7]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.812 q7bca020f6715.smd 1 [1 of 2 not deleted] 
files were deleted.  You should not use an on-access virus scanner that 
scans the \IMail directory or sub-directories.   

Darrell   


 ---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, 
Imail, mxGuard

[Declude.Virus] 4.2.20 Error in Log

2006-07-12 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Since upgrading to 4.2.20 I started seeing the following error: 

07/12/2006 00:34:41.812 q7bca020f6715.smd 1 [1 of 2 not deleted] files 
were deleted.  You should not use an on-access virus scanner that scans the 
\IMail directory or sub-directories.07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 

This only happens when AVG catches a virus.  It did not get logged under 3.x 
version.  Nor do I have an On Access Virus Scanner.  Anyone else seeing 
this? 

Darrell 

See the log snippet below. 


07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 q7bca020f6715.smd Vulnerability flags = 0
07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 q7bca020f6715.smd MIME file: [text/html][7bit; 
Length=733 Checksum=67160]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 q7bca020f6715.smd MIME file: email-details.zip 
[base64; Length=108312 Checksum=13182423]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.781 q7bca020f6715.smd AVG Reports VIRUS: 
IRC/BackDoor.SdBot.PMS
07/12/2006 00:34:41.781 q7bca020f6715.smd File(s) are INFECTED 
[IRC/BackDoor.SdBot.PMS: 7]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.812 q7bca020f6715.smd 1 [1 of 2 not deleted] files 
were deleted.  You should not use an on-access virus scanner that scans the 
\IMail directory or sub-directories.07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 
q7bca020f6715.smd Vulnerability flags = 0
07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 q7bca020f6715.smd MIME file: [text/html][7bit; 
Length=733 Checksum=67160]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.328 q7bca020f6715.smd MIME file: email-details.zip 
[base64; Length=108312 Checksum=13182423]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.781 q7bca020f6715.smd AVG Reports VIRUS: 
IRC/BackDoor.SdBot.PMS
07/12/2006 00:34:41.781 q7bca020f6715.smd File(s) are INFECTED 
[IRC/BackDoor.SdBot.PMS: 7]
07/12/2006 00:34:41.812 q7bca020f6715.smd 1 [1 of 2 not deleted] files 
were deleted.  You should not use an on-access virus scanner that scans the 
\IMail directory or sub-directories. 

Darrell 


---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, 
mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] 4.2.3 Built-in scanner

2006-07-06 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
John, 

What problems are you having with scan.exe?  A lot of us use McAfee and have 
no issues. 


Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, 
mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. 



John Shacklett writes: 


After loading 4.2.20 this afternoon, my AVG scanner is now finally detecting
viruses. Oh happy day. Now if I can just get scan.exe to work, I'll have a
full house. 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Shacklett
Sent: Thursday, 11 May 2006 11:44 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] 4.2.3 Built-in scanner 

Declude 4.2.3 Diagnostics right on the top line.  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
Sent: Thursday, 11 May 2006 9:30 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] 4.2.3 Built-in scanner 


Just curious, what does your diags.txt?  Did 4.2.3 in fact get fully
installed and running? 

John C  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Shacklett
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 6:56 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] 4.2.3 Built-in scanner 


I guess I should have been more dramatic. What I intended this to mean was
that I still don't see any evidence that AVG is working at all.  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Shacklett
Sent: Tuesday, 09 May 2006 3:04 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] 4.2.3 Built-in scanner 


Just for fun, I completely commented out the three scanners in my virus.cfg
and resent the eicar plain test file, and it made it to my Inbox.  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Shacklett
Sent: Tuesday, 09 May 2006 9:58 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] 4.2.3 Built-in scanner 

Forget my last post, I have different problems. Sorry. 


I followed John C's suggestion and sent myself a standard base64 MIME
encoded eicar.com file [which should have occurred to me earlier], and I
ended up with the following lines in the debug output: 


05/09/2006 09:50:57.007 q9e3d01cb331c.smd AVG Reports No Virus
05/09/2006 09:50:57.178 q9e3d01cb331c.smd Virus scanner 1 reports exit
code of 3
05/09/2006 09:50:58.444 q9e3d01cb331c.smd Virus scanner 2 reports exit
code of 0
05/09/2006 09:50:58.616 q9e3d01cb331c.smd Virus scanner 3 reports exit
code of 0 

 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
Sent: Tuesday, 09 May 2006 9:41 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] 4.2.3 Built-in scanner 


Temporarily go to LOGLEVEL DEBUG and use the test virus sender.  It should
show AVG working. MID and HIGH levels didn't show which scanner caught
EICAR, but DEBUG did. 

John C 



05/09/2006 08:34:55.687 q9a7b016d30e4.smd AVG Virus detected. Not
continuing with any remaining scanners.
05/09/2006 08:34:55.687 q9a7b016d30e4.smd AVG Reports VIRUS: EICAR_Test
05/09/2006 08:34:55.687 q9a7b016d30e4.smd AVG Reports Not Healable 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 8:13 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] 4.2.3 Built-in scanner 


1. Use the test virus sender http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=99
2. Check your virus logs
3. Declude\Scanners\AVG\DB
4. Check the date on the database files 


David B
www.declude.com  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Shacklett
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 8:45 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] 4.2.3 Built-in scanner 



How do I determine if the built-in scanner is working? Where do the virus
signature files live? How do I tell if those files are being updated? 


--

John S 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, just
send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, just
send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, just
send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, just
send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be 

Re: [Declude.Virus] New Virus: zipped word doc with Macro-Virus

2006-06-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Mcafee is catching these Trojan.Myno on my systems. 


Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, 
mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. 



Markus Gufler writes: 


Some of us has noted in the past two hours that messages with an zip-file as
attachment has passed our virus filters 

It's a zip-file containing a MS Word Document named my_notebook.doc 


Most Virus-Scanners can't catch it. Virustotal has returned only two
scanners with positive results 

Sophos has found WM97/Kukudro-A 
UNA has found a Macro Virus 

No other AV-Engine has catched the suspicious file. 


We've added the following lines to our virus.cfg in order to block as much
was we can at the moment. 


BANNAME prices.zip
BANNAME apple_prices.zip
BANNAME sony_prices.zip
BANNAME hp_prices.zip
BANNAME dell_prices.zip
BANNAME My_Notebook.doc 


Regards
Markus 

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] New Virus: zipped word doc with Macro-Virus

2006-06-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Actually, it is CLAMAV catching it.  Not sure about McAfee as I stop on 
first virus.  F-Prot is def. not catching it though. 

Darrell 

Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes: 

Mcafee is catching these Trojan.Myno on my systems.  


Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, 
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.  



Markus Gufler writes:  

Some of us has noted in the past two hours that messages with an zip-file 
as
attachment has passed our virus filters  

It's a zip-file containing a MS Word Document named my_notebook.doc  


Most Virus-Scanners can't catch it. Virustotal has returned only two
scanners with positive results  

Sophos has found WM97/Kukudro-A UNA has found a Macro Virus  

No other AV-Engine has catched the suspicious file.  

We've added the following lines to our virus.cfg in order to block as 
much
was we can at the moment.  


BANNAME prices.zip
BANNAME apple_prices.zip
BANNAME sony_prices.zip
BANNAME hp_prices.zip
BANNAME dell_prices.zip
BANNAME My_Notebook.doc  


Regards
Markus  

  


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.  





---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, 
mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.Virus] fpReview Released - Easily Review Held Messages

2006-05-22 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
fpReview is a utility that allows you to easily review held mail on your 
Imail or SmarterMail system. With fpReview you can review messages and 
return them back to the queue for delivery or rescanning by Declude. Besides 
being able to return the message to the queue for delivery many other 
options are available such as delete, move, copy, etc. 

Another useful feature is the ability to report false positives or spam to 
3rd parties by using the integrated email function. fpReview is an 
intelligent application that will adapt to your workflow. It will remember 
email addresses and subjects to streamline future reporting of messages. 

In addition fpReview will import your configured Declude filters from your 
Declude global.cfg. This allows you to create custom Declude rules on the 
fly through our custom interface. 


Screen Captures:
http://www.invariantsystems.com/fpreview/screencaptures.htm 


Download:
http://www.invariantsystems.com/fpreview/default.htm 

Darrell 


---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, 
mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] reque slips by Declude?

2006-05-18 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
With older versions of Declude and Smartermail you used to have to do the 
X rename to skip Declude processing.  If you left the X off it would be 
rescanned by Declude.


However, now that Declude is intergrated into Smartermail v3 what is the 
correct requeing process?


Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.



- Original Message - 
From: Dean Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 7:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] reque slips by Declude?


Gary,

I do believe that messages that have been re-queued do not get scanned
a second time. If they did, you would never be able to re-queue
anything since it would be continually caught.

Dean

On 5/18/06, Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back on May 9 my server was hit by the Feebs virus.  I am using F-Prot, 
which did not detect it.  But I am using BANEXT hta which caught it.


Two days ago I upgraded to SmarterMail 3.1 and Declude 4.2.3.  Among other 
things, I've been looking at the addition of AVG to Declude.  I noticed 
that F-Prot still doesn't detect that version of the Feebs virus, but AVG 
does.  So I thought I would test it.  I still have a copy of the virus I 
received on May 9, so I requed it unchanged and unrenamed to let it got 
through the new Declude to see what would happen.  To my surprise it was 
delivered!  No new Declude headers were added to the message.  Though 
SmarterMail did modify it because it detected it as spam.  I checked the 
virus logs (LOGLEVEL set to HIGH) and there was no listing at all for this 
message.


Naturally I am now quite nervous.  Why did this happen?  Have any other 
Feebs viruses slipped through?  Unfortunately the eicar tests don't have 
an hta to use, so the only way I have to test this is with a live virus. 
The Feebs virus isn't one of the more common ones, but all it takes is one 
to get through to spoil the day of one of my customers.


Gary Steiner



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.




--
__
Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner
Internet Data Technology
888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/
Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] (re)Installing Declude v1.65 on Imail 8.22?

2006-05-08 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])



The activation code goes into the virus.cfg 
file. Did your official hostname change (assuming your running imail) if 
so contact declude support to resolve this issue.

Darrell

Check 
out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Eric 
  Mamet 
  To: Declude.Virus@declude.com 
  Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 8:51 AM
  Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] 
  (re)Installing Declude v1.65 on Imail 8.22?
  
  
  You might have put 
  the finger on it…
  Found this in the 
  log
  
  05/08/2006 14:40:27 
  Q3c3b0eecfd47 Declude Virus NOT running due to invalid activation 
  code.
  05/08/2006 14:40:27 
  Q3c3b0eecfd47 Error: Invalid Declude Virus activation code for 
  open-resources.co.uk.
  
  The activation code 
  in the Virus.Cfg file is the one I have in my original email from 
  declude.
  Our main domain name 
  may not have been the same at the time. Where does it gets this 
  open-resources.co.uk from? Is this what I should 
  change?
  
  Thanks
  
  
  Eric
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
  Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])Sent: 08 May 2006 13:34To: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.Virus] 
  (re)Installing Declude v1.65 on Imail 8.22?
  
  
  Eric,
  
  
  
  Are you only using Declude 
  Virus? If not are there other Declude headers in the 
  message?
  
  In the Virus logs does this 
  message exist? Is there virus logs 
  (virMMdd.log).
  
  
  
  Did you uninstall Declude because 
  of this issue or is this a new server? If this is a new server did you 
  double click on the declude.exe first?
  
  In the Imail SMTP tab for the 
  delivery application does it specific declude.exe? If yes, is the path 
  correct?
  
  
  
  2 things to note - [1] there have 
  been reports of folks having to click the declude.exe multiple times for it to 
  reinstall for some reason and [2] there are some issues with the old declude 
  architecture under imail 8.2x the new version 3.x / 4.x fixes those 
  issues. The issue is related to imail's multithreaded smtp engine. 
  I never had the issue, but a lot of folks 
  did.
  
  
  
  
  
  Darrell
  
  Check 
  out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
  utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue 
  Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log 
  Parsers.
  

- Original Message - 


From: Eric 
Mamet 

To: declude.virus@declude.com 


Sent: Monday, 
May 08, 2006 8:16 AM

Subject: 
[Declude.Virus] (re)Installing Declude v1.65 on Imail 
8.22?


I am trying to re-install 
Declude v1.65 onto Imail 8.22.

I tried to send an eicarplain 
pseudo virus (http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=99) 
and it went right through to my inbox!
It look s like Declude is not 
involved at all…

Has anybody tried 
that?

Eric

PS: I am using F-Prot 
anti-virus


[Declude.Virus] DLAnalyzer 5.0 Released

2006-04-17 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
DLAnalyzer 5.0 has been released.  DLAnalyzer is a comprehensive reporting 
tool that integrates both Junkmail and Virus statistics into one report. 
Some of the features require the Enterprise or Standard version, but we also 
have a FREE LITE version available.


With version 5.0 we have added many new features including new reports like: 
Recipient Based Spam Reports, Test Quality Report that evaluates how 
effective the configured tests are on your system, Domain Executive Reports, 
and Domain Recipient Reports. In addition we have also added a new level of 
customization of the reports allowing you to change the look and feel of the 
report through the use of cascading style sheets.


Report Samples: http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/reportsamples.htm

Release Notes: http://www.invariantsystems.com/download/current/readme.txt

Download: http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/download.asp

Any questions let me know,
Darrell 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Under specific conditions, action not as specified

2006-02-12 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Michael,

Can you post some log snippet's from your junkmail logs showing this going 
through junkmail and the corresponding AV log entries.  I run this exact 
same configuration and do not have this issue.


Darrell


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message - 
From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 7:01 PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Under specific conditions, action not as specified



Declude Version: 3.0.5.23

In GLOBAL.CFG
STOPPROCESSINGONFIRSTDELETE ON

In JunkMail, a message scores more than enough points to be DELETED.

In VIRUS.CFG
AVAFTERJM ON
DELETEVULNERABILITIES   OFF

The result is that the message is moved to the /sppol/virus folder. It 
should have been deleted


Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-683-6718
1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)
N¬f¢-¬±Æ§ç_¢»â®ë±¼fyÉnuá 
0uç%¹×o¢dáSÁj)\jgY®?­.àÞr[yX«ºÉsSX§,X¬µ:.z˱Êâmèî²ÛÖ§f¢-ÚT¨¥²»ÝyÉnuç(T©Ý·*^º{.nÇ+?·fyÉnuåb®ë.æ«r¯zÇ

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])

How does AVAFTERJM cut down on work?  I thought it only affected the
order in which JM and AV ran, and that AV ran each time, regardless of
this setting.


The main benefit is that it cuts down on the amount of messages virus 
scanned thus saving resources.  It has been a MAJOR help for me. 


Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, 
mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Keith, 

It still gets virus scanned.  I have tons of viruses in my virus drop point 
for ROUTETO accounts. 


Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, 
mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. 



Keith Johnson writes: 


Darrell,
  What happens in this scenario.  Virus file comes in, AVAFTERJM
is turned on, thus Declude scans it for spam content, lets say it is
spam, thus ROUTETO sends it to a specific mailbox for customer to review
for certain amount of days.  Does Declude Virus still run against it
prior to ROUTETO?  My fear is that the virus file will land in their
spam box untouched and the user will fire the virus off by looking at
file.   

Keith 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 10:02 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME 



How does AVAFTERJM cut down on work?  I thought it only affected the 
order in which JM and AV ran, and that AV ran each time, regardless of



this setting.


The main benefit is that it cuts down on the amount of messages virus 
scanned thus saving resources.  It has been a MAJOR help for me.  


Darrell
 ---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, 
mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.  


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Keith, 

We don't ROUTETO all of our mail.  We hold and delete on a bunch.  In this 
case 95% of mail is not virus scanned.  If you routeto everything than I 
suspect you will not save any cycles. 


Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, 
mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. 



Keith Johnson writes: 


Darrell,
 I guess my question then is what advantage is it to have it run
prior to Virus if the Virus Scanner still scans it, won't it still use
the same CPU cycles?   

Keith 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 10:43 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME 



Keith,  


It still gets virus scanned.  I have tons of viruses in my virus drop
point 
for ROUTETO accounts.  


Darrell
 ---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, 
mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.  



Keith Johnson writes:  


Darrell,
  What happens in this scenario.  Virus file comes in, 
AVAFTERJM is turned on, thus Declude scans it for spam content, lets 
say it is spam, thus ROUTETO sends it to a specific mailbox for 
customer to review for certain amount of days.  Does Declude Virus 
still run against it prior to ROUTETO?  My fear is that the virus file



will land in their spam box untouched and the user will fire the virus

off by looking at
file.

Keith 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell

([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 10:02 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME 




How does AVAFTERJM cut down on work?  I thought it only affected the
order in which JM and AV ran, and that AV ran each time, regardless

of



this setting.


The main benefit is that it cuts down on the amount of messages virus
scanned thus saving resources.  It has been a MAJOR help for me.   


Darrell
 ---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, 
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe,



just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe,



just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
  


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Don, 

Messages that are HOLD or DELETE are not virus scanned.  ROUTETO gets 
virus scanned.  In summary you have to look at your situation and if it 
makes sense for you.  We don't do much ROUTETO so it makes sense for us and 
saves a signifigant amount of CPU. 

Darrell 


---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, 
mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. 



Don Brown writes: 

Your first and second message seem to be contradictory or I'm dense. 


#1 The main benefit is that it cuts down on the amount of messages
virus scanned thus saving resources. 

#2 It still gets virus scanned. 


So, with or without AVAFTERJM, it looks like each message is scanned by the 
virus
scanner (which makes sense to me).  If that is so, then how does it
cut down on machine resources? 

 


Friday, January 27, 2006, 9:43:19 AM, Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] wrote:
Dsic Keith,  


Dsic It still gets virus scanned.  I have tons of viruses in my virus drop 
point
Dsic for ROUTETO accounts.  


Dsic Darrell
Dsic  ---
Dsic Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, 
Imail,
Dsic mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
Dsic integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.  



Dsic Keith Johnson writes:  


Darrell,
  What happens in this scenario.  Virus file comes in, AVAFTERJM
is turned on, thus Declude scans it for spam content, lets say it is
spam, thus ROUTETO sends it to a specific mailbox for customer to review
for certain amount of days.  Does Declude Virus still run against it
prior to ROUTETO?  My fear is that the virus file will land in their
spam box untouched and the user will fire the virus off by looking at
file.

Keith  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 10:02 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME  



How does AVAFTERJM cut down on work?  I thought it only affected the 
order in which JM and AV ran, and that AV ran each time, regardless of



this setting.


The main benefit is that it cuts down on the amount of messages virus 
scanned thus saving resources.  It has been a MAJOR help for me.   


Darrell
 ---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, 
mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.   


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]  


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]  


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Dsic   


Dsic ---
Dsic [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] 


Dsic ---
Dsic This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
Dsic unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
Dsic type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
Dsic at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

 



Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049
 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])

HOLD, DELETE, ETC - Does not get virus scanned with AVAFTERJM
ROUTETO, SUBJECT, Etc - Does get virus scanned. 

Think of it this way anything that ends up being delivered somewhere (i.e. 
mailbox etc) gets scanned. 

Darrell 



Matt writes: 

This is the crux of the issue that I would like to figure out. 

I am however under the impression that if you DELETE a message, Declude 
Virus never gets it.  I suspect that HOLD and MAILBOX are also that way.  
I am unsure about ROUTETO, and that is what really matters to me. 

As far as savings of resources, it is apparently huge, especially for 
those running multiple virus scanners.  Virus scanning takes more CPU than 
all but the biggest JunkMail configs (things like custom filters with 
thousands of lines of BODY or ANYWHERE searches).  I know that on my 
system I Delete about 70% of all messages, ROUTETO about 10%, and deliver 
about 20%.  I would like to save on scanning what I would otherwise be 
deleting with JunkMail. 

Matt 

 

Keith Johnson wrote: 


Markus,
   However, Darrell mentioned that the AV scanner still runs once
action is taking agains the SPAM message (i.e. routeto, subject, etc.).
Is this not true? 

Keith  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 12:03 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME 



  

So, with or without AVAFTERJM, it looks like each message is scanned by 
the virus scanner (which makes sense to me).




Wrong... if you block the messages on the servers: 


As we know usualy 50% of all incomming messages are spam.
We know too that resource usage of one or two scan-engines is way above
the entire spam filtering even if you use 5-6 external applications like
sniffer, inv-uribl, spamchk, ... 


So if you're spam filters are set up properly they will filter out at
least 50% of all incomming messages before they will reach the
av-engines. 

Markus 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



  





---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, 
mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] My quick and dirty virus stats

2006-01-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])



If you don't want to bother learning or using perl 
I suggest you look at DLAnalyzer. It can do Junkmail reporting and Virus 
reporting for Declude integrated into one Windows based application. There 
is a functional free version (lite).

Darrell
Check 
out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Imail 

  To: Declude.Virus@declude.com 
  Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 3:55 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] My quick and 
  dirty virus stats
  I don't know PERL and with being in the middle of a cluster 
  project along with an open source photo gallery project along with... 
  etc... I'm up to my eyeballs in technical learning right now. I 
  would REALLY appreciate the script. If you get time just email it to 
  this address [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
  I'll get it going...Thanks...MarkAt 02:21 PM 
  1/27/2006, you wrote:
  I use 
PERL for most of this stuff. Easy enough to learn, or I could send you the 
script off-line.Karl 
Drugge-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
ImailSent: Friday, January 27, 2006 2:37 PMTo: 
Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.Virus] My quick 
and dirty virus statsAndrew,What are you using to 
compile these numbers?MarkAt 12:48 PM 1/27/2006, you 
wrote:Just because it's easy to produce...This is from the viruses that get caught as spam from 
Dec 01 2005 through yesterday: 13 Suspicious 
program in 
Archive 
1 Suspicious 
program 
5 Unknown Virus 57 
W32/Bagle 
1 W32/Banker 13 
W32/Brepibot 28 
W32/Kapser 33 
W32/Klez 108 
W32/Mitglieder 13 
W32/Mydoom 665 
W32/Mytob 1,124 
W32/Netsky 5,607 
W32/Sober 
1 
W32/Torvil 
5 W32/ZafiAndrew 
8)No 
virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG 
Anti-Virus.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/243 - Release 
Date: 1/27/2006--PLEASE 
NOTE : Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written 
communications to or from City officials regarding City business are public 
records available to the public and media upon request. Your E-mail 
communications may be subject to public disclosure.PLEASE NOTE : 
Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to 
or from City officials regarding City business are public records available 
to the public and media upon request. Your E-mail communications may be 
subject to public disclosure.No virus found in this incoming 
message.Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 
267.14.23/243 - Release Date: 1/27/2006
  
  

  No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG 
  Anti-Virus.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/243 - Release 
  Date: 1/27/2006


Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude Hardware Issue

2005-12-26 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])



FYI - For the other affected by this I put 3.0.5.22 
back on and everything is flying along with no issues. Processing messages 
as fast as could be.

FWIW - My issues started on December 24th at 
approximatly - 2:10pm EST.

I will follow-up with Declude tomorrow to determine 
why my version decided to downgrade itself.

Darrell
Check 
out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  David 
  Franco-Rocha 
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 
  
  Cc: Declude.Virus@declude.com 
  Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 4:00 
  PM
  Subject: [Declude.Virus] Declude Hardware 
  Issue
  
  Please note that the hardware issue preventing 
  communication with Declude has been resolved. Key authentication has resumed 
  as normal.
  
  There appear to be some misconceptions on the 
  lists regarding the key authentication system. In the event that your key 
  cannot be authenticated (either due to communication failure or because the 
  key was never issued):
  
  A) Your software will continue to 
  function
  
  B) Your software is NEVER downgraded for any 
  reason, either automatically or otherwise
  
  We have had a few reports from customers who have 
  licensed versions of Pro, saying that they are receiving messages in their log 
  files that they do not have the Pro version. We will identify the source of 
  that issue tomorrow when the office reopens and will resolve it. It does not 
  have any relation to the key authentication mechanism with the server, since 
  the actual authentication with IMail versions of Declude continues to be via 
  the old codes entered into the configuration files.
  
  David Franco-Rocha
  Declude Technical / Engineering
  


[Declude.Virus] Sober Virus - Secret Code.

2005-12-10 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,123876,00.asp 


Key paragraph -
//begin
Security firm iDefense said it broke the encrypted code in a Sober variant 
discovered in November and found that it is designed to download the unknown 
code from various Web addresses on January 5, 2006. Millions of zombie 
computers may already be infected with the variant, the company said. 

The date coincides with the 87th anniversary of the founding of the Nazi 
Party. The release of worms has been tied to political events in the past, 
iDefense noted, in a kind of hactivisim designed to distribute propaganda.
//end 

ugh - I suspect more german pro-nazi spam... 


Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude and IMail 2006

2005-11-30 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Knowing that there are issues with 1.x and 2.x with Imail 8.2x and 2006 
extends from 8.2x I would suspect that you may have issues. 


Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



J Porter writes: 

Does Declude (Virus and JM Pro) 1.82 work with Imail 2006?? 


Call me chicken... lol...
but I really don't have the guts to do both upgrades at the same time... 
:)
There are entirely t many instances of sober and mytob hitting us 
daily. 


Thanks
~Joe  


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] how is Declude 3.x?

2005-11-24 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I run 3.0.5.20 DFx - I think 1 or 2.  It has a few extra fixes for me the 
dnsbl issue is the ket one.  I run it on two servers (imail) volume on 
server 1 - 150K and volume on server 2 - 100K. 

External tests: invURIBL  Sniffer 

Darrell 



Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



Sanford Whiteman writes: 

3.0.5y.20 on Imail running fine here.  


I think it would be helpful if 3.0.x adopters could mention IMail/SmarterMail version, Windows OS version, msgs/day, and which (publicly available) external tests they're running. 

I honestly thought, after the rash of buggy releases and seemingly insufficent internal testing, that I would not deploy 3.0.x for several months, if ever.  I'm sure I'm not alone. 

--Sandy 


--
 
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist 
Broadleaf Systems, a division of 
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


--
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] how is Declude 3.x?

2005-11-24 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I understand what everyone is saying, beleive me I do.  What I can tell you 
is that 3.x is much better than 2.x.  Especially, since it fixes the issues 
I had where 100's of declude processes would unexpectantly launch and would 
hose the server.  I have found the later versions to be very stable and 
fast. 

The big issues I am seeing with the new version is variables that were not 
per thread.  I can tell you everyone of my issues that my twin (inside joke 
on the twin) or I have reported has been taken very seriously.  I can tell 
you that David Franco-Rocha has been very aggressive working a lot of these 
issues.  You know they are on the right track when you get builds to fix 
issues at 3am in the morning.. 

Hang in there its all starting to come together and I think when you ready 
to dive into 3.x you will be very happy... 


Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 




Darin Cox writes: 


Totally agree with you there, Sandy.  We're trying to decide whether to
renew the service agreement.  We paid for a year and haven't upgraded at all
due to the stability problems and bugs with 2.x and 3.x, though we are
considering upgrading to IMail 2006 and 3.0 soon.  Things seem to have
settled down a bit. 

What are you running? 2.06 with IMail 8.15? 

We're still running IMail 8.05 and 1.82 currently. 

Darin. 



- Original Message - 
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] how is Declude 3.x? 




3.0.5y.20 on Imail running fine here.


I think it would be helpful if 3.0.x adopters could mention
IMail/SmarterMail version, Windows OS version, msgs/day, and which (publicly
available) external tests they're running. 


I honestly thought, after the rash of buggy releases and seemingly
insufficent internal testing, that I would not deploy 3.0.x for several
months, if ever.  I'm sure I'm not alone. 

--Sandy 


--
 
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist

Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] New Sober to be released, possible variation?

2005-11-15 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Mark, 

In general for these types of viruses yes you are ok as long as the 
extensions in the zips are ones that you are blocking. 


Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 





Mark Reimer writes: 

If we are banning extensions within zip files we should be ok right? 


Mark Reimer
IT Project Manager
American CareSource
800-370-5994 ext. 267 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 2:30 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] New Sober to be released, possible
variation? 



And another: 

BANNAME	packed-password_text.zip 


John T
eServices For You 




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 10:16 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] New Sober to be released, possible variation? 

Another one to block... 

BANNAME Accept_e-Text.zip 

The list so far is 


# Added 11/15/2005 to handle new Sober.R, S, T, U, V, W variants
BANNAME Accept_e-Text.zip
BANNAME email_photo.zip
BANNAME excel_table.zip
BANNAME foto.zip
BANNAME liste.zip
BANNAME reg_text.zip
BANNAME registration.zip
BANNAME tabelle.zip
BANNAME word-text.zip 


As mentioned before, we keep these in place even after the virus

definitions

are catching them.  That way new variants that use the names are caught
before definitions are available. 

Darin. 



- Original Message -
From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 11:57 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] New Sober to be released, possible variation? 



There are very interesting details in Trend Micro's writeup. 


http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM%5FS
OBER%2EADVSect=T 


i.e. it uses its own SMTP server plus a hardcoded list of accounts and
IDs at 27 ISPs, and that it terminates the Microsoft Windows Malicious
Software Removal Tool. 


It may be worth mentioning that the BANNAME list that Darin provided
will be useful for those of us using F-Prot only, as they are still not
detecting the variant I've been receiving since this thread started. 

Andrew 8) 



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
 Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 6:05 AM
 To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
 Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] New Sober to be released,
 possible variation?

 Most the new Sober variants are expected to be low volume, so
 I'm not surprised that Netsky.P continues to outstrip them.

 Security vendors are varying as to what they are detecting
 with 6 new Sober variants yesterday and today.  Best bet is
 to ban the files at least until virus definition files have
 caught up.  We keep the bans in place for the usual overlap
 in new variants.

 Darin.


 - Original Message -
 From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
 Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 8:44 AM
 Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] New Sober to be released,
 possible variation?


 Thank you Darin.

 just curious after watching our virus logfiles today
 Anyone else can confirm that there are only a few of the
 today new virus and
 far more netsky (most .p variant) showing up in the logfiles?

 Today I've had some reports that certain varaints of the new
 virus slipped
 trough while it was definitively catching some others.

 Markus



  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
  Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 2:33 PM
  To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
  Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] New Sober to be released,
  possible variation?
 
  I just went through all of the reports.  Here's a list of new
  filenames to
  ban:
 
  # Added 11/15/2005 to handle new Sober.R, S, T, U, V, W variants
  BANNAME email_photo.zip
  BANNAME excel_table.zip
  BANNAME liste.zip
  BANNAME reg_text.zip
  BANNAME registration.zip
  BANNAME tabelle.zip
 
 
  Darin.
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Doug Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
  Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 8:24 AM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] New Sober to be released,
  possible variation?
 
 
  Looks like varying attachment names. I got one thats excel_table.zip
 
  - Original Message -
  From: David Dodell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: John T (Lists) Declude.Virus@declude.com
  Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 6:50 AM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] New Sober to be released,
  possible variation?
 
 
   Monday, November 14, 2005, 10:50:00 PM, John T (Lists) wrote:
  
   Sophos is now calling it Sober-R.
  
   Possible variation received this morning ... the text discussed

Re: [Declude.Virus] Help! Upgraded from 1.82 to 3. today

2005-11-05 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Also, in the Command AVAFTERJM OFF

I assume this means it SCANS viruses first, then the junkmail?


No it actually scans for viruses after junkmail.

Darrell
---
invURIBL - Intelligent URI Filtering.  Stops SPAM by focusing on the 
spamvertised link.  More effective than traditional RBL's.  Download a copy 
today - http://www.invariantsystems.com 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Help! Upgraded from 1.82 to 3. today

2005-11-05 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])

David,

When you say messages are getting stuck in the spool do you mean after they 
are processed by Declude?  When you upgraded to Declude 3.x did you replace 
the declude.exe file?


Darrell

---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail Queue Monitoring, Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.


- Original Message - 
From: David Dodell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: David Dodell Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Help! Upgraded from 1.82 to 3. today



I noticed that my virus scanner is no longer sending me notices when
it intercepts a virus ... before I used to get email notice from
declude that a virus, and/or spam was intercepted, but now that seemed
to have stopped ... is there a switch I need to turn on / off?


It appears messages are getting stuck in my spool ... I see messages
addressed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to david david (same user
twice)

Any ideas?

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] Help! Upgraded from 1.82 to 3. today

2005-11-05 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])

David,

Sorry I did not read far enough to the OFF part.  If set to off Viruses 
are scanned for first which is the default setting.  Normally you do not see 
someone have that in their config unless they are going to set it to ON 
which scans for viruses after JM.


Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail Queue Monitoring, Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.


- Original Message - 
From: David Dodell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 3:57 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] Help! Upgraded from 1.82 to 3. today


Saturday, November 5, 2005, 1:42:02 PM, Darrell 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:



Also, in the Command AVAFTERJM OFF

I assume this means it SCANS viruses first, then the junkmail?



No it actually scans for viruses after junkmail.


Ok, I turned it on since I want it to scan for viruses BEFORE
junkmail.

Doesn't make sense to me, I read it as:

AV (Virus) AFTER JM (Junkmail) and if ON would mail Virus After
Junkmail and OFF would mean Virus BEFORE Junkmail




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] Help! Upgraded from 1.82 to 3. today

2005-11-05 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I caught that in the later thread.  On my system I see the same behavior 
where the gsc/gse will get processed by the next queue run as well.  I do 
seem to remember in older versions that they were tried to be delivered 
right away.


Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail Queue Monitoring, Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.



- Original Message - 
From: David Dodell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 3:59 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] Help! Upgraded from 1.82 to 3. today


Saturday, November 5, 2005, 1:43:11 PM, Darrell 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:


When you say messages are getting stuck in the spool do you mean after 
they
are processed by Declude?  When you upgraded to Declude 3.x did you 
replace

the declude.exe file?


As I mentioned in another post, it appears that the Postmaster
generated messages are sitting in the \imail\spool directory, but with
a GSE or GSC extension instead of SMD ... and are eventually processed
within 20 or 30 minutes, I'm assuming being caught by the queue being
reprocessed in that time period??

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Second scanner

2005-11-04 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I use Mcafee and it has been great they tend to be amoung the top for 
getting updates out quick.  However, it is very resource intensive. 


Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Declude Log Parsers. 



David Dodell writes: 


After many years of using Virus Standard, I upgraded to Virus Pro to
take advantage of a second scanner.   I've scanned the previous
threads on what others like for a second scanner to F-Prot, but can't
seem to find any common thread ... 


So I would appreciate what seems to be the next most popular virus
scanner to run as a secondary scanner to F-Prot? 

David 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] Multiple Anti-virus Vendor Detection Bypass

2005-10-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(4) MODERATE: Multiple Anti-virus Vendor Detection Bypass 

Affected: Multiple AV vendors including McAfee, Trend Micro, Kaspersky, 
Sophos, CA, Panda. 

Description: Multiple anti-virus engines reportedly contain a vulnerability 
that can lead to bypassing detection of malware in .bat, .html and 
.eml files. The problem occurs because the detection engines stop 
processing these files if they are tagged with a fake executable file 
header. Note that with the increase in client-side attacks, bypassing 
malicious HTML detection may lead to spread of spyware and other malware on 
desktop systems. Multiple proof of concept examples have been posted. 



Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] Virus name reported as different than what scanner detected.

2005-10-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Anyone seen this before?  The message (attachment) have the W97M/Thus Virus 
and is detected by McAfee as having such, but the final virus string somehow 
ends up at Netsky? 

Darrell 


x:\imail\spoolgrep -i q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd vir1028.log
10/28/2005 11:21:09.718 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Vulnerability flags = 0
10/28/2005 11:21:09.718 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd MIME file: HD New Look 
list.doc [base64; Length=59

904 Checksum=2996157]
10/28/2005 11:21:10.750 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Virus scanner 1 reports exit 
code of 0
10/28/2005 11:21:11.359 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Virus scanner 2 reports exit 
code of 13
10/28/2005 11:21:11.359 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Scanner 2: Virus= the 
W97M/Thus.gen Attachment=HD

New Look List.doc [11] I
10/28/2005 11:21:11.359 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd File(s) are INFECTED [ 
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 13]
10/28/2005 11:21:32.796 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS 
[MIME: 2 60102]
10/28/2005 11:21:32.796 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [

incoming from 64.207.161.182]
10/28/2005 11:21:32.796 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Subject: Here we go Again - 
Proposal 





Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Virus name reported as different than what scanner detected.

2005-10-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
A little more checking and this seems to be happening on any message 
infected with a virus  Possible bug... 

Running 3.x, AVAFTERJM, with EXITSCANONVIRUSDETECT   ON 

10/28/2005 00:39:56.359 qab8ff7a40618ffdf.smd File(s) are INFECTED [ 
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 3]
10/28/2005 00:41:47.968 qabfaf7c50618004e.smd Virus scanner 1 reports exit 
code of 3
10/28/2005 00:41:47.968 qabfaf7c50618004e.smd Scanner 1: Virus= 
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Attachment=email-details.zip [11] O
10/28/2005 00:41:47.984 qabfaf7c50618004e.smd File(s) are INFECTED [ 
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 3]
10/28/2005 00:56:05.015 qaf506d06099e03ac.smd Scanner 1: Virus= 
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Attachment=email-password.zip [11] O
10/28/2005 00:56:05.015 qaf506d06099e03ac.smd File(s) are INFECTED [ 
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 3] 



Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes: 

Anyone seen this before?  The message (attachment) have the W97M/Thus 
Virus and is detected by McAfee as having such, but the final virus string 
somehow ends up at Netsky?  

Darrell  


x:\imail\spoolgrep -i q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd vir1028.log
10/28/2005 11:21:09.718 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Vulnerability flags = 0
10/28/2005 11:21:09.718 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd MIME file: HD New Look 
list.doc [base64; Length=59

904 Checksum=2996157]
10/28/2005 11:21:10.750 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Virus scanner 1 reports exit 
code of 0
10/28/2005 11:21:11.359 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Virus scanner 2 reports exit 
code of 13
10/28/2005 11:21:11.359 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Scanner 2: Virus= the 
W97M/Thus.gen Attachment=HD

New Look List.doc [11] I
10/28/2005 11:21:11.359 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd File(s) are INFECTED [ 
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 13]
10/28/2005 11:21:32.796 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS 
[MIME: 2 60102]
10/28/2005 11:21:32.796 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [

incoming from 64.207.161.182]
10/28/2005 11:21:32.796 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Subject: Here we go Again - 
Proposal  

 



Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, 
MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.  








Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Virus name reported as different than what scanner detected.

2005-10-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
That's good to hear that others are seeing this as well...  Hopefully, we 
will have a fix soon. 


Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



Bill Landry writes: 


Yep, I'm seeing the same thing with Version 3.0.5.12:
=
10/28/2005 10:56:04.343 q662b02abbeb9.smd Vulnerability flags = 0
10/28/2005 10:56:04.343 q662b02abbeb9.smd MIME file: [text/html][7bit; 
Length=714 Checksum=63910]
10/28/2005 10:56:04.390 q662b02abbeb9.smd MIME file: email-details.zip 
[base64; Length=93976 Checksum=11204045]
10/28/2005 10:56:04.390 q662b02abbeb9.smd Banning .ZIP file with scr 
extension.
10/28/2005 10:56:06.156 q662b02abbeb9.smd Virus scanner 1 reports exit 
code of 3
10/28/2005 10:56:06.171 q662b02abbeb9.smd Scanner 1: Virus= 
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Attachment=email-details.zip [16] I
10/28/2005 10:56:07.109 q662b02abbeb9.smd Virus scanner 2 reports exit 
code of 1
10/28/2005 10:56:07.109 q662b02abbeb9.smd Scanner 2: Virus= [ 
WORM_MYTOB.LV](1) in 
M:\IMail\spool\proc\work\D662B0~1.VIR\0.zip,(email-details.htm .scr) 
Attachment=email-details.zip [16] I
10/28/2005 10:56:07.109 q662b02abbeb9.smd File(s) are INFECTED [ [ 
TROJ_GOLDUN.G](1) in 
M:\IMail\spool\proc\work\D644C0~1.VIR\0.rar,(MsWindowsUpdate.exe): 1]
10/28/2005 10:56:07.109 q662b02abbeb9.smd Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS 
[Prescan OK][MIME: 2 94832]
10/28/2005 10:56:07.109 q662b02abbeb9.smd From: xxx To: xxx [incoming 
from xxx]
10/28/2005 10:56:07.109 q662b02abbeb9.smd Subject: Important 
Notification 

= 


10/28/2005 10:56:22.171 q664302abbecd.smd Vulnerability flags = 0
10/28/2005 10:56:23.750 q664302abbecd.smd Virus scanner 1 reports exit 
code of 3
10/28/2005 10:56:23.750 q664302abbecd.smd Scanner 1: Virus= 
HTML/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Attachment= [16] I
10/28/2005 10:56:24.625 q664302abbecd.smd Virus scanner 2 reports exit 
code of 1
10/28/2005 10:56:24.625 q664302abbecd.smd Scanner 2: Virus= [ 
HTML_Netsky.P](1) in 
M:\IMail\spool\proc\work\D66430~1.VIR\0,(NONAMEFL) Attachment= [16] I
10/28/2005 10:56:24.625 q664302abbecd.smd File(s) are INFECTED [ [ 
TROJ_GOLDUN.G](1) in 
M:\IMail\spool\proc\work\D644C0~1.VIR\0.rar,(MsWindowsUpdate.exe): 1]

10/28/2005 10:56:24.625 q664302abbecd.smd Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS
10/28/2005 10:56:24.625 q664302abbecd.smd From: xxx To: xxx [incoming 
from xxx]
10/28/2005 10:56:24.625 q664302abbecd.smd Subject: Mail delivery 
failed: returning message to sender
= 


Bill
- Original Message - From: Darrell 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 9:37 AM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Virus name reported as different than what 
scanner detected. 



Anyone seen this before?  The message (attachment) have the W97M/Thus 
Virus and is detected by McAfee as having such, but the final virus 
string somehow ends up at Netsky?

Darrell
x:\imail\spoolgrep -i q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd vir1028.log
10/28/2005 11:21:09.718 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Vulnerability flags = 0
10/28/2005 11:21:09.718 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd MIME file: HD New Look 
list.doc [base64; Length=59

904 Checksum=2996157]
10/28/2005 11:21:10.750 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Virus scanner 1 reports 
exit code of 0
10/28/2005 11:21:11.359 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Virus scanner 2 reports 
exit code of 13
10/28/2005 11:21:11.359 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Scanner 2: Virus= the 
W97M/Thus.gen Attachment=HD

New Look List.doc [11] I
10/28/2005 11:21:11.359 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd File(s) are INFECTED [ 
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 13]
10/28/2005 11:21:32.796 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS 
[MIME: 2 60102]
10/28/2005 11:21:32.796 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [

incoming from 64.207.161.182]
10/28/2005 11:21:32.796 q41c378d5099ed6c9.smd Subject: Here we go Again - 
Proposal 




Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, 
MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Slightly OT: Encrypting or Securing Email Content

2005-10-11 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Kevin, 

I thought PGP had a desktop version that integrates directly with outlook? 


Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



Kevin Rogers writes: 

We're looking for a simple way to opportunistically allow our users to 
encrypt or password-protect certain emails and/or their attachments that 
contain sensitive data.  We're running Declude Pro and have banned EZIP 
extensions (the highly recommended suggestion from several people on this 
forum), so that kinda rules out PKZIP and any kind of ZIP program (because 
as soon as you password-protect a ZIP file, it becomes an EZIP file).  We 
looked at PGP, but it seems very complex and seems to require a hardware 
proxy in between our mail server and the Net.  Is there a simple and 
effective way to encrypt or password protect documents for email 
transmission that doesn't cause problems with Imail or Declude and doesn't 
require software to be installed on the recipient's end? 

Thanks. 


Kevin
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses.] 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Slightly OT: Encrypting or Securing Email Content

2005-10-11 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Please no talk about sharp objects - I just had a vasectomy a couple of 
hours ago - oh the pain...


Darrell

---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail Queue Monitoring, Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.


- Original Message - 
From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 5:00 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Slightly OT: Encrypting or Securing Email 
Content



What is wrong with sharp objects? They make nice clean cuts.

Now, it's the blunt ones that I worry about.

John T
eServices For You


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 1:44 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Slightly OT: Encrypting or Securing Email

Content


I block all encrypted zips based on the fact that I can't virus scan them.

But then again I'm slightly paranoid and should not be trusted with sharp
objects.

- Original Message -
From: Kevin Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Slightly OT: Encrypting or Securing Email
Content


 So it's this forum's consensus that if I have PRO I should not block all
 EZIPs - I should just block the other extensions even if they are found
 within ZIP files?

 I do send out notices when a file gets blocked, but I don't have a

requeue

 script in place.  I'll search for one and see what I can do.  Thanks.



 Darin Cox wrote:

If you have Declude Virus/EVA Pro you can switch to banning extensions
within zips.  With Standard, you may want to continue to ban encrypted
zips.

In either case, you will probably want to send out notices for banned
files,
notifying the intended recipient that a file sent to them was blocked.
Include a link in the notification for them to requeue the message if it
was
legit and they want to receive it.  Scripts to requeue messages have

been

posted to the list in the past, but they are very simple to create by

just

moving the Q and D files back to the spool directory... possibly going

as

far as launching the SMTP32 process to immediately send the message if

you

don't want your user to wait for the next queue run.

Darin.


- Original Message -
From: Kevin Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 1:26 AM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Slightly OT: Encrypting or Securing Email

Content



We're looking for a simple way to opportunistically allow our users to
encrypt or password-protect certain emails and/or their attachments that
contain sensitive data.  We're running Declude Pro and have banned EZIP
extensions (the highly recommended suggestion from several people on
this forum), so that kinda rules out PKZIP and any kind of ZIP program
(because as soon as you password-protect a ZIP file, it becomes an EZIP
file).  We looked at PGP, but it seems very complex and seems to require
a hardware proxy in between our mail server and the Net.  Is there a
simple and effective way to encrypt or password protect documents for
email transmission that doesn't cause problems with Imail or Declude and
doesn't require software to be installed on the recipient's end?

Thanks.

Kevin
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses.]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses.]




 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses.]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] Bitdefender Vulnerability

2005-10-10 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
FYI - For those using Bitdefender - 


05.40.20 CVE: Not Available
Platform: Cross Platform
Title: BitDefender Antivirus Logging Function Format String
Vulnerability
Description: BitDefender Antivirus is a proprietary antivirus product
for multiple platforms. It is vulnerable to a format string issue in
its logging functionality. This issue is due to a failure of the
application to properly sanitize user-supplied input prior to passing
it as the format specifier to a formatted printing function. A remote
attacker may leverage this issue to write to arbitrary process memory,
facilitating code execution and privilege escalation. BitDefender
versions 7.2, 8, and 9 for Windows are reported vulnerable. Other
versions and platforms may also be affected. 

Ref: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14968/info 




 




Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Possible new virus

2005-10-05 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Alot got through today with that one, but its being 
caught by F-Prot now.

10/05/2005 22:06:18 Q86937B8E01F27E50 MIME file: 
pword_change.zip [base64; Length=113709 Checksum=13075286]10/05/2005 
22:06:18 Q86937B8E01F27E50 Scanner 2: Virus=W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Attachment=pword_change.zip [12] O

My first hit was at 20:02 EST tonight.

Darrell
---Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail Queue Monitoring, Declude Overflow 
Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Darin Cox 
  To: Declude.Virus@declude.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 10:33 
  PM
  Subject: [Declude.Virus] Possible new 
  virus
  
  We're seeing a lot of emails with 
  pword_change.zip attached. May want to block it in your 
  virus.cfg.
  
  Subject is"Your new Password" All so 
  far were routed through gmx.net or web.de just before delivery, but are 
  originating from a variety of dial-up or broadband ISP 
  accounts.
  Darin.
  
  


Re: [Declude.Virus] Possible new virus

2005-10-05 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Mcafee released this within the last hour - 


Advisory This is a Medium Threat 
Advisory for W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Justification W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] has been 
deemed Medium due to prevalence. 
Read About It Information about 
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] is located on VIL at: http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_136390.htm 
Detection W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] was first 
discovered on October 5, 2005 and detection will be added to the 4598 dat files (Release Date: October 5, 2005). 
The EXTRA.DAT IS AVAILABLE. 
If you suspect you have W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED], please submit a sample 
to http://www.webimmune.net. 
Risk Assessment Definition For further 
information on the Risk Assessment and AVERT Recommended Actions 
please see: http://www.mcafeesecurity.com/us/security/resources/risk_assessment.htm 

Best Regards, 
McAfee AVERT - Anti Virus and Vulnerability Research, Analysis, 
and Solutions visit us at www.avertlabs.com 

---DLAnalyzer - Comprehensive 
reporting on Declude Junkmail and Virus. Download it today - http://www.invariantsystems.com.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Darrell 
  ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
  To: Declude.Virus@declude.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 10:46 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Possible new 
  virus
  
  Alot got through today with that one, but its 
  being caught by F-Prot now.
  
  10/05/2005 22:06:18 Q86937B8E01F27E50 MIME file: 
  pword_change.zip [base64; Length=113709 Checksum=13075286]10/05/2005 
  22:06:18 Q86937B8E01F27E50 Scanner 2: Virus=W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Attachment=pword_change.zip [12] O
  
  My first hit was at 20:02 EST 
  tonight.
  
  Darrell
  ---Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
  utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail Queue Monitoring, Declude 
  Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log 
  Parsers.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Darin Cox 
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com 
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 10:33 
PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Possible new 
virus

We're seeing a lot of emails with 
pword_change.zip attached. May want to block it in your 
virus.cfg.

Subject is"Your new Password" All 
so far were routed through gmx.net or web.de just before delivery, but are 
originating from a variety of dial-up or broadband ISP 
accounts.
Darin.




Re: [Declude.Virus] Version 3.0.5.5

2005-09-29 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Harry, 

The message on my system just said you need to remove the last version.  
Once I did that and re-ran the update all was well. 

Darrell 



Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



Harry Vanderzand writes: 


I downloaded this update
 
stopped decludeproc
 
ran the update
 
got message:  Another version is already running, cannot update
 
what's up with that?
  

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222 

  



  _   


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Billman
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 2:53 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Version 3.0.5.5 

 

Declude Version 3.0.5.5 is available on the website for download. 

There are two changes from version 3.0.5.3 

  


1.  Fix for special character scanning causing abnormal termination.
Special thanks to John Tolmachoff for identifying and helping us fix this
nasty.  


2.  For SmarterMail only.  Correctly handle parsing the XML file for the
email installation path.  

  

SY, Bill Billman 

Declude 

  



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.7/112 - Release Date: 9/26/2005 






---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] ...Change after Upgrade in the case (upper/lower) of letters in D Q files

2005-09-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Jeff, 

Yes that is normal with the 3.0 upgrade.  It is just a cosmetic change and 
does not really impact anything. 


Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



Jeff writes: 

I have no idea if this is of any importance as all appears to be working well, but after upgrading while I was reviewing messages held in my SPAM and ViRUS folders I noticed that all of the letters in the Q  D files (with the exception of the D that begins a D file) are now in lower case as shown below.  

Has anyone else noticed this ? 



After Declude Upgrade 


D3a5001f80247.smd
q3a5001f80247.smd 

Before 


D2B3A0DEC2046.SMD
Q2B3A0DEC2046.SMD  

 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] Invariant Systems MRTG Scripts Updated For Declude 3.0

2005-09-26 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Our MRTG scripts that we make available for Declude users have been updated 
for the new log format of Declude 3.0.  The programs are provided free and 
as is.


They can be downloaded from our site listed in the tag line.

Any questions let me know.
Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail Queue Monitoring, Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude Beta 3.0.4.4 Posted

2005-09-23 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I think it really depends on your volume if you will see this.  Also, if you 
have already tweaked your WAITFORMAIL you may not see it as well.  On my 
system during off peak hours I get on anverage between 75-100 messages per 
minute.  What you will see is Declude will spawn up to 20 or so threads (I 
modified my threads value to keep up with volume) and process the messages.  
Once the decludeproc finishes processing that round of messages it will stop 
using any CPU time and sit idle for roughly 30 seconds.  Once it sleeps for 
30 seconds it will start to process messages again.  See snippet of log 

09/22/2005 21:38:43.703 q5c96523a026274b2.smd Successfully move 
[x:\IMail\spool\proc\work\q5c96523a026274b2.smd] to 
[x:\SPAM-HOLD\22Sep2005\q5c96523a026274b2.smd]
09/22/2005 21:39:08.968 q5c646c64029c7469.smd CFG: Set hop to 0. 

What occurs on my system is that the initial process completes and there is 
still messages in the /proc directory, but instead of grabbing more messages 
out of the /proc directory Declude goes to sleep.  During the time it sleeps 
even more messages come in.  Essentially what occurs is the amount of mail 
in the /proc folder just climbs steadily. 

Now I switched the WAITFORMAIL setting down to 1 second, but under those 
settings it appears to chew up an inordinate amount of CPU.  I am still 
tweaking the values for a balance. 

The box is a Dell PowerEdge 2600 Dual Xeon with HT enabled with 4GB of RAM.  
Fresh install of Windows 2003 running Imail 8.15 HF 2.  The box is only used 
for gatewaying. 

I guess the moral of the story is you would not really see this (if it 
affects you) only if the volume the box is processing is more than what the 
normal /work queue runs can handle.  You could probably easily test this by 
increasing your WAITFORMAIL setting to a couple of minutes.  If you are 
not affected by this than your system will continue to function properly and 
process the mail in the /proc folder as it should.  If it is affected by it 
you would see files still in the proc folder and Declude go to sleep for 
that specified period of time.  The key thing is that you would have to 
watch the proc folder since normal operation would be for the decludeproc 
service to go to sleep if no files existed in the folder. 

Darrell 



Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



Andy Schmidt writes: 

Hi Nick: 


I'm only repeating what I'm told - I don't have factual information on my
own. 


There have been several reports on this list that describes the following
problem with dual-processor systems: 


Declude is supposed to check the /proc folder and ONLY go to sleep (for 30
seconds), if the folder contains no messages. On systems that have that
problem, Declude goes to sleep even though there ARE messages to process. 

The result is, that messages are queuing up and never get processed. 


There is a parameter to set the sleep time low (e.g. 1 second), this way,
the effect of the problem is less - but now Declude does't go to sleep when
it actually could - with a possible impact on resource consumption. 



(Of course, the question is why this appears to be related to dual-processor
systems.  May be one process still has an access lock against the first file
in the proc folder and another process doesn't handle that error condition
right - who knows.) 

 



Best Regards
Andy Schmidt 


Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206  

 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 08:15 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude Beta 3.0.4.4 Posted 



Hi Andy, 

Andy Schmidt wrote: 

Thanks Bill.  I had gotten the impression as if everyone with 
dual-processor system was reporting this and that people were still 
seeing it with the latest version.
  

If you will would you let me know more about this issue. I haven't been 
following exactly so I do not know what I should be looking for  :) I have
3.0.4.4  running on my quad processor [with hyper threading] box 
without ant problems - at least as far as I can tell. If I'm I missing 
something I will revert back to 2.0.6.16 in a heartbeat! 

-Nick 

  


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, just
send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL 

Re: [Declude.Virus] AVAFTERJM ?

2005-09-22 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Marcel, 

AVAFTERJM ON goes in the virus.cfg file and it makes AV run after JM as 
you suspected.  Several of us run this mode for the reason you cited.  The 
only deal you have to remember is if something is trapped by JM and you put 
it back in the queue it will not be virus scanned. 


Darrell

invURIBL - Intelligent URI filtering plug-in for Declude.  Try it today 
http://www.invariantsystems.com 

Marcel Sangers writes: 

Hello all, 


We make use of the latest Declude version (spam+virus) Pro. What does
the AVAFTERJM option do? Antivirus scanning after Junkmail I suppose?
What is the default? First scanning viruses followed by scanning for
spam? 


Due to the large amounts of spam I would suggest first filtering out
spam followed by possible viruses? Is that correct? 


Regards,
Marcel 




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude Beta 3.0.4.4 Posted

2005-09-22 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The directives are for tuning both single and multiprocessor systems. 
They
are not meant as a tradeoff.  Some multiprocessor systems do not exhibit 
the
reported sleep for 30 seconds behavior.  We have not been able to 
reproduce

it ourselves.


I can produce it on my machine even on version 3.0.4.4.  David was also 
provided remote access to my machine and seen this issue occur when I first 
reported it under the early beta.



It's hard to fix something that we can't reproduce but we will keep
trying.  It's not even clear to me that this problem still exists in the
latest version.


I posted earlier (and to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]) that the problem still exists 
in the latest beta.  Again, I can provide remote access to this machine if 
needed.  You can mitigate the effects of this issue by adjusting the 
waitformail, but it seems to cause more cpu related usage.


What concerns me even more than the obvious issue with multiprocessor 
machines is its excessive use of CPU.  This is also included in my beta 
notes.


Darrell



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 7:56 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Beta 3.0.4.4 Posted

Hi David,

I can't help but ask...

You are proposing options that will help with the dual processor issue.
But, are you REPRODUCING the issue and fixing it? I understand that the
problem is that the service goes to sleep for 30 seconds, even though 
there

are messages in the PROC folder. Clearly that should not happen.  Changing
the timings will only create a trade-off by consuming extra
machine-resources.

Even on a dual-processor system should the service be able to determine
reliably if a folder has content or not?

I'm just worried that the beta is declared successful when an entire 
class

of machines is only working with a bandage.

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:28 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Beta 3.0.4.4 Posted

Yes, these are to help adjust for timing with Dual-proc

Different systems / configuration respond differently to these settings.

In particular they to fine tune through-put with CPU utilization.

1. SLOW server that is heavily loaded

You may want to try to increase WAITBETWEENTHREADS and lower THREADS.

2. FAST server
Use the THREADS and WAITFORTHREADS to adjust the CPU utilization.

When decludeproc first starts up it will use a lot of the CPU but after 
that

the %CPU used by decludeproc should come way down.

The %CPU of all processes running may be high depending on external tests,
other processes, etc.  If the system is spiking but coming down quickly
that's good.

David B
www.declude.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:27 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Beta 3.0.4.4 Posted

David,
Are these to be used to correct issues with Dual-proc, or is that
still an ongoing issue still be looking at?  Thanks for the time.

Keith

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 11:41 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Declude Beta 3.0.4.4 Posted


2 new Directives

WAITFORTHREADS  1500
Located in the Declude.cfg - Defined in milliseconds eg. 1500 = 1.5 
seconds

this can be changed so that when the maximum threads are in use this time
specifics the wait before checking to launch more threads.

WAITBETWEENTHREADS 1
Located in the Declude.cfg - Defined in milliseconds eg. 1 = 1 millisecond
The time to wait between spawning one thread and starting to process 
another

thread.

David B
www.declude.com

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, 
just

send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, 
just

send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, 
just

send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by 

Re: [Declude.Virus] blocking eml and msg attachemtns

2005-09-14 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Also, any emails that are mime/base64 encoded should be mime decoded by the 
AV scanner.  I know mcafee has that option which we enable. 


Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



Darin Cox writes: 


With Declude 1.82, we haven't had any trouble with decoding and blocking
viruses or banned attachments in attached .eml or .msg files.  We wouldn't
block them separately because of all of forwarded messages sent as
attachments, both by us, AOL feedback loops, and by our users. 

Darin. 



- Original Message - 
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 1:32 PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] blocking eml and msg attachemtns 



What are others thoughts on blocking eml and msg attachments? 


If there is an eml or msg attachment which that has a executable or virus
attachment, will Declude properly decode it and will it be scanned for
viruses and banned attachments? 


John T
eServices For You 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude Beta 3.0.3.8 Available

2005-09-14 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
David, 

Any progress on the issues we seen under multi-processor environments? 

Darrell 

David Barker writes: 


If you are running the Declude Beta please upgrade to 3.0.3.8 and send
feedback to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
David B
www.declude.com 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Limit Size of message to be scanned?

2005-07-08 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Grant, 

Their is nothing native to Declude to prevent that - the only real option 
besides something custom is to limit the size at the imail layer. 


Darrell

InvURIBL - Intelligent URL filtering - stops 85% of spam with the default 
configuration.  http://www.invariantsystems.com 



Grant Griffith writes: 


Yep, we had one client send a 50+ and 45+ at the same time.  That is about
the same time the system locked up.  It is a Dual Pentium 3.6 processors
with at least 2 gig of memory.  I would of hoped it could keep up, but seems
to be a pattern this week whenever huge emails get sent thru the server, it
locks up and needs rebooted to fix it. 

  


How does anyone else handle this?  I would guess there would be a way to not
scan messages over a certain size 

  

Thanks, 

Grant Griffith 

EI8HTLEGS, A Division of ETC 

(812)932-1000 

  _   


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 2:05 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Limit Size of message to be scanned? 

  

50 MB e-mail attachments? 

  

Youch! 

  

John T 

eServices For You 

  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 8:36 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Limit Size of message to be scanned? 

  

Hello All, 

  


Is there a way to limit the size of the message that Declude/F-Prot can
scan?  We have some customers that are sending 50+ meg files and it is
causing our servers to have major issues.  Is there a setting to say skip
anything over a certain size?  Either in F-Prot or Declude? 

  


We fixed it currently by setting it to OFF for certain domains, but really
want to ban extensions and vulnerabilities for those domains.. 

  

  

Thanks, 

Grant Griffith 

EI8HTLEGS, A Division of ETC 

(812)932-1000 

  




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Limit Size of message to be scanned?

2005-07-08 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Grant, 

What I do is set the Single Message Size under the domain.  The limit I 
have in place for most of my sites I maintain is between 10MB - 20MB. 

If this is a store and forward server you can set this on the primary domain 
of the server and it affects all of the domains you gateway for. 


Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 




Grant Griffith writes: 

Darrell, 


How can I do this on the Imail end?  I can limit attachments sent thru Web
Messaging, but not via Outlook or anything else.  At least I can not find
any settings for that. 


Thanks,
Grant Griffith
EI8HTLEGS, A Division of ETC
(812)932-1000
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:13 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Limit Size of message to be scanned? 

Grant,  

Their is nothing native to Declude to prevent that - the only real option 
besides something custom is to limit the size at the imail layer.  


Darrell
 
InvURIBL - Intelligent URL filtering - stops 85% of spam with the default 
configuration.  http://www.invariantsystems.com  



Grant Griffith writes:  


Yep, we had one client send a 50+ and 45+ at the same time.  That is about
the same time the system locked up.  It is a Dual Pentium 3.6 processors
with at least 2 gig of memory.  I would of hoped it could keep up, but

seems

to be a pattern this week whenever huge emails get sent thru the server,

it
locks up and needs rebooted to fix it.  

   


How does anyone else handle this?  I would guess there would be a way to

not
scan messages over a certain size  

   

Thanks,  

Grant Griffith  

EI8HTLEGS, A Division of ETC  

(812)932-1000  

  _


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 2:05 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Limit Size of message to be scanned?  

   

50 MB e-mail attachments?  

   

Youch!  

   

John T  

eServices For You  

   


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 8:36 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Limit Size of message to be scanned?  

   

Hello All,  

   


Is there a way to limit the size of the message that Declude/F-Prot can
scan?  We have some customers that are sending 50+ meg files and it is
causing our servers to have major issues.  Is there a setting to say skip
anything over a certain size?  Either in F-Prot or Declude?  

   


We fixed it currently by setting it to OFF for certain domains, but really
want to ban extensions and vulnerabilities for those domains..  

   

   

Thanks,  

Grant Griffith  

EI8HTLEGS, A Division of ETC  

(812)932-1000  

   

  


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Limit Size of message to be scanned?

2005-07-08 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Grant, 

Here are the links to the messages 


Org - http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg24792.html
Update - 
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg24977.html 


Hope this helps
Darrell 


---
DLAnalyzer - Comprehensive reporting on Declude Junkmail and Virus.
http://www.invariantsystems.com 

Grant Griffith writes: 

Hey All, 


Is there a known issue with Declude 2.0.6.16 and Imail 8.2?  I recall
reading something a few weeks ago about a possible issue and we did just
upgrade toward the end of last week. 

I scanned the archives, but did not find anything specific. 


Thanks,
Grant Griffith
EI8HTLEGS, A Division of ETC
(812)932-1000 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:38 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Limit Size of message to be scanned? 

Thanks Darrell, 

I knew the setting was there somewhere, but kept overlooking it. 


Thanks,
Grant Griffith
EI8HTLEGS, A Division of ETC
(812)932-1000 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:34 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Limit Size of message to be scanned? 

Grant,  

What I do is set the Single Message Size under the domain.  The limit I 
have in place for most of my sites I maintain is between 10MB - 20MB.  

If this is a store and forward server you can set this on the primary domain 

of the server and it affects all of the domains you gateway for.  


Darrell
 
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 

Integration, and Log Parsers.  

  

Grant Griffith writes:  

Darrell,  


How can I do this on the Imail end?  I can limit attachments sent thru Web
Messaging, but not via Outlook or anything else.  At least I can not find
any settings for that.  


Thanks,
Grant Griffith
EI8HTLEGS, A Division of ETC
(812)932-1000
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:13 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Limit Size of message to be scanned?  

Grant,   

Their is nothing native to Declude to prevent that - the only real option 
besides something custom is to limit the size at the imail layer.   


Darrell
 
InvURIBL - Intelligent URL filtering - stops 85% of spam with the default 
configuration.  http://www.invariantsystems.com   



Grant Griffith writes:   


Yep, we had one client send a 50+ and 45+ at the same time.  That is

about

the same time the system locked up.  It is a Dual Pentium 3.6 processors
with at least 2 gig of memory.  I would of hoped it could keep up, but

seems

to be a pattern this week whenever huge emails get sent thru the server,

it
locks up and needs rebooted to fix it.   




How does anyone else handle this?  I would guess there would be a way to

not
scan messages over a certain size   



Thanks,   

Grant Griffith   

EI8HTLEGS, A Division of ETC   

(812)932-1000   

  _ 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 2:05 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Limit Size of message to be scanned?   



50 MB e-mail attachments?   



Youch!   



John T   

eServices For You   




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 8:36 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Limit Size of message to be scanned?   



Hello All,   




Is there a way to limit the size of the message that Declude/F-Prot can
scan?  We have some customers that are sending 50+ meg files and it is
causing our servers to have major issues.  Is there a setting to say skip
anything over a certain size?  Either in F-Prot or Declude?   




We fixed it currently by setting it to OFF for certain domains, but

really
want to ban extensions and vulnerabilities for those domains..   





Thanks,   

Grant Griffith   

EI8HTLEGS, A Division of ETC   

(812)932-1000   



   


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.  

  


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can

Re: [Declude.Virus] NetSky and Sasser author sentenced, Microsoft pays up

2005-07-08 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Slap on the wrist and his friends got paid for turning him in...  Looks like 
a win-win for all of them. 

Darrell 

John Tolmachoff (Lists) writes: 


So the virus writer got a slap on the wrist. Boy, that will sure send a
message to would be virus writers. 

  

John T 

eServices For You 

  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 11:40 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] NetSky and Sasser author sentenced, Microsoft pays
up 

  


Well, the speculation on whether Microsoft would make good on their bounty
to Sven Jaschen's friends is over. 

  

http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/ 

  

  

Andrew 8) 






Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude Failed To Initialize Properly

2005-07-06 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
See - http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg24938.html 
I posted about this issue a couple of times.  We are currently waiting on a 
fix - but this is the cause from what I can see from the debug logs.


Darrell
---
invURIBL - Intelligent URI Filtering.  Stops 85%+ SPAM with the default
configuration. Download a copy today - http://www.invariantsystems.com

- Original Message - 
From: Avolve Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 5:36 PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Declude Failed To Initialize Properly


Has anyone had this message box pop up on their server and if so has 
anyone found a workaround for the problem ?


The application failed to intialize properly (0xc142). Click on OK to 
terminate

the application.

Running Imail 8.20 - 2005.04.12.23 with hotfix 2 and the latest beta of 
Declude 2.0.6.16 and had 2.0.6 but it did the same thing.


Running 700mhz Pentium III with 384Megs, plenty of drive space and do not 
receive that much email.


I'm trying to play with the queue manager, but haven't found a combination 
yet that stops this problem.


Thanks and praise for a fix, it's driving me insane.





Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net




---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] ClamAV Cabinet File Parsing Remote Denial of Service

2005-07-05 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
FYI - For those who have not seen this and are running ClamAV. 


05.26.8 CVE: CAN-2005-1923
Platform: Cross Platform
Title: ClamAV Cabinet File Parsing Remote Denial of Service
Description: ClamAV is a virus scanning utility. ClamAV is affected by a 
remote denial of service issue. ClamAV versions 0.85.1 and earlier are known 
to be vulnerable.
Ref: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14089 



Darrell 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability

2005-06-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Dan, 

I have been running 2.0.6 with no major issues that plague me on a daily 
basis.  The only issue I have encountered is when the server is under high 
load and Declude spawns processes until the server starts generating errors. 
Since I upgraded the server it doesnt happen very often. 

For the install you can grab the package from your account on the declude 
site.  The manual install was pretty easy - just install and select manual 
along with a directory.  The upgrade for 2.0.6.16 the last beta is just an 
exe download. 


Hope this helps,
Darrell 



Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 




Dan Geiser writes: 


Hi, Again,
I was able to find the ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM in the Declude Release 
Notes, http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122.  It looks like this 
feature was added in Declude 2.0.  But it appears the current version of 
Declude 2.0.6.  Since we are running 1.82 I assume that I'll have to 
upgrade to 2.0 at least.  Is 2.0.6 a safe version to upgrade to in light 
of the issues people have added with bugs and the like?  If so, is there a 
special place where I can go to get instructions on doing a Manual Upgrade 
to 2.0.6? 


Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


- Original Message - From: Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: DECLUDE.VIRUS@DECLUDE.COM
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 3:52 PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring Boundary Space Gap Vulnerability 




Hello, All,
We are running... 


Declude 1.82
Declude JunkMail Status: PRO version registered.
Declude Virus Status:Standard Version Registered. 

We have a customer who has an important e-mail which is being blocked by 
our
virus protection with the Outlook 'Boundary Space Gap' Vulnerability. 


Is there anyway that I can turn off checking for the Outlook 'Boundary
Space Gap' Vulnerability on either a specific incoming e-mail address or 
a
specific incoming e-mail domain? 


Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan) 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan) 

 

 


---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan) 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] blocking by IP address

2005-06-20 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])

If you are using Imail just add it into the SMTP Access Control List.  This
will block them from connecting to them.

Darrell
--
DLAnalyzer - Comprehensive reporting for Declude Junkmail and SPAM.  Try it
today http://www.dlanalyzer.com

Susan Duncan writes:


I have the standard version of Declude virus and spam.  I am receiving
viruses every day from a particular IP address.  I've contacted the admin
for that IP address to no avail.  I would just like to block everything from
that IP so that we aren't getting messages about all the viruses we're
blocking from that address.

Is there an easy way to do that?

Susan Duncan
Web/Communications Officer / Agent des Communications/web
Union of Taxation Employees / Syndicat des employées de l'Impôt
Tel: 613-235-6704 ext 240
Fax: 613-234-7290
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ute-sei.org/



---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG
Integration, and Log Parsers.


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Newbie question

2005-06-08 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Kevin,

You would place that in your virus.cfg file.

Darrell
-
DLAnalyzer - Comprehensive reporting for Declude Junkmail and Virus.  Try it
today - http://www.invariantsystems.com

Kevin Rogers writes:


Should I put  AVAFTERJM ON in my global.cfg file?  And does it matter
where I put it inside the file?

Thanks.


David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ] wrote:


Thanks. This will be added to the manual.

David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical Support

- Original Message - From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Newbie question



Great... Could the Declude staff have this added to the manual?

Darin.


- Original Message - From: Guhl, Markus (LDS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 4:28 AM
Subject: AW: [Declude.Virus] Newbie question


hi darin,

we use AVAFTERJM ON with Declude 2.0.6.14 and it works like we need it.

mfg
i.a.
gez. markus guhl
***
lds nrw
ref. 241
tel.: 0211 9449 2578
fax.: 0211 9449 8344
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



-Ursprngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Darin Cox
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. Juni 2005 23:02
An: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Betreff: Re: [Declude.Virus] Newbie question


I don't know if it still exists since it is not in the current manual,
but
there was an option in previous versions of AV called AVAFTERJM that
allowed
JunkMail to run first.  Otherwise you are correct that AV would run
first.

Darin.


- Original Message - From: Kevin Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Newbie question


Thanks for the quick response.  Yes, I have the Pro versions for both AV
and Junkmail.


Darin Cox wrote:


Do you have the Pro version of Declude Junkmail?  You have to have pro
to
use filters and outbound scanning.  The fromfile filter I mentioned
will
work in the standard version, though.

Darin.


- Original Message - From: Kevin Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Newbie question


I changed it to HEADERS and still I am receiving emails from these
addresses (got 4 of them personally yesterday).  My virus scanner is
now
updated every four hours, so F-Prot caught these viruses, but I still
am
receiving the virus notifications.  Perhaps the scanning takes place
(and the notifications are sent out) before my filter is called?

This is what my filter file contains:
HEADERS0CONTAINS[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HEADERS0CONTAINS[EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc.

This is what I have in my global.cfg
MYFILTERfilterC:\Imail\Declude\Filter.txtx200

This is in my $default$.junkmail file
WEIGHT20HOLD

What am I missing?

Thanks.


Scott Fisher wrote:




The MAILFROM filter test is seperate from anything in the headers. It
is the envelope sender.

If you want to test on the header from (I call it display from because
that's what Outlook displays), you need to check the HEADERS.


- Original Message - From: Kevin Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 3:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Newbie question





Great.  Exactly what I needed.
I was also confused about the MAILFROM.  Does MAILFROM mean what is
displayed as the FROM: in the headers or what it says in the X-Note:
This E-mail was sent from 206-72-95-86.wi.skypipeline.com
([206.72.95.86])  or in the X-Declude-Sender field?

Maybe I should just use the HEADERS 0 CONTAINS instead.

Thanks again.



Scott Fisher wrote:




One caveat. The MAILFROM uses the envelope mailfrom, which is
different than the ones displayed in the headers.
If the below doesn't stop it, add
HEADERS 0 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HEADERS 0 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message - From: Kevin Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Newbie question





I looked up the filter section at the manual.  This is what I did.

I made a file called filter.txt.  This contains:
MAILFROM0CONTAINS[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAILFROM 0CONTAINS[EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc.

I then added this line in global.cfg:
MYFILTERfilterC:\Imail\Declude\filter.txtx200

In my $default$.junkmail file there was already this line:
WEIGHT20HOLD

Do I need to do anything else to the junkmail file to reference
MYFILTER or does the WEIGHT20 take care of everything?

Thanks.

Kevin



Darin Cox wrote:




Nope... add a filter test and put those lines in it.  The same
thing I
mentioned without pro applies here for adding test names to the
global.cfg
and $default$.junkmail.

The manual at 

[Declude.Virus] Another mytob variant

2005-06-02 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Another MyTob variant is out.  F-Prot is catching it but Mcafee is not.  
Mcafee does have an extra.dat for it. 

The file is coming in as info-text.zip. 

Darrell 



DLAnalyzer - Comprehensive reporting on Declude Junkmail and Virus.  Try it 
today http://www.invariantsystems.com 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] New virus out?

2005-05-31 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
John, 

What do the filenames appear to be - any pattern either filename, subject, 
body content etc? 

Darrell 

John Tolmachoff (Lists) writes: 


One of the servers I manage is getting hit with lots of messages being
caught with banned exe within zip. 

They are coming from different IPs 


John T
eServices For You 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] MS05-16 Exploit

2005-05-31 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
a mass-mailing virus.  Declude defaults to BANCSLID ON which may or may 
not protect from such an attack.  Some CSLID calls are entire valid and 
normal for Outlook/Office generated E-mails, and I'm not totally sure 


Plus the other question is does Declude look for the CSLID calls in files in 
zip's. 

Darrell 


--
DLAnalyzer - Comprehensive reporting on Declude Junkmail and Virus.  Try it 
today - http://www.invariantsystems.com

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] EXITSCANONVIRUS

2005-05-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
My thoughts are this - a virus is a virus and a vulnerability is a
vulnerability.  My expectation is that if a virus is detected than the other
scanners will not be called.  However, if a vulnerability is detected the
scanners will execute until such time a virus is found.

Maybe two switches - EXITSCANONVULNERABILITY...

However, on the grander scale of things if nothing changed on this I would
still use EXITSCANONVIRUS as long as it observes the various delivery
options on vulnerabilities.

Darrell

---
invURIBL - Intelligent URI Filtering.  Stops 85%+ SPAM with the default
configuration. Download a copy today - http://www.invariantsystems.com


- Original Message - 
From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 12:49 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] EXITSCANONVIRUS


John, can you expand on that?

In my implementation, there is no difference in message treatment if a
vulnerability or virus is detected.  Therefore, I am happy to stop the
virus scanning if a vulnerability is detected.  That is, as long as
ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM is still respected.

Of course, I've already found that these two had too many false
positives for the safety they afford, so I've turned them off:

BANPARTIAL OFF
BANCRVIRUSES OFF

which leaves me with

BANCLSID ON

which has never been triggered.

Andrew 8)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 12:34 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] EXITSCANONVIRUS


Well, here is an example of what I was hoping not to see.

05/27/2005 23:35:14 Q112105DF2AB2 Vulnerability flags = 0 05/27/2005
23:35:14 Q112105DF2AB2 Outlook 'CR' vulnerability [Subject: H] in
line 15 05/27/2005 23:35:15 Q112105DF2AB2 Virus scanner 1 reports
exit code of 0 05/27/2005 23:35:15 Q112105DF2AB2 File(s) are
INFECTED [[Outlook 'CR'
Vulnerability]: 0]
05/27/2005 23:35:36 Q112105DF2AB2 Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS
05/27/2005 23:35:36 Q112105DF2AB2 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [incoming from x.x.x.x] 05/27/2005
23:35:36 Q112105DF2AB2 Subject: How is Rebecca doing?

In this case, the subject line is the last line for the message in the
Declude Virus log in HIGH and it apparently shows that scanners 2  3
were not called. If it finds a vulnerability, it still should fire the
scanners to see if one of them finds an actual virus.

John T
eServices For You


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ]
 Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 7:21 AM
 To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
 Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] EXITSCANONVIRUS

 John,

 There is a processing loop wherein all the scanners are called in
 succession. It is independent of vulnerability checking. This
 directive merely tells Declude to break out of the external virus
 scanner execution loop. If you use this directive to exit the scanning

 loop on virus
detection
 and (1) you have 5 scanners listed in your cfg file and (2) a virus is

 detected by the first scanner listed, then the effect is exactly the
 same
in
 processing as if you had a single scanner listed and a virus were
 detected by that single scanner.

 David Franco-Rocha
 Declude Technical Support

 - Original Message -
 From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
 Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 2:50 AM
 Subject: [Declude.Virus] EXITSCANONVIRUS


 A question about this new feature.

 Am I correct in thinking that as soon as a scanner reports a virus,
 the
next
 scanner(s) in line will not be called and the message will be
 processed accordingly, and that it will not be affected by Declude
 first finding a banned attachment before having it scanned by a
 scanner?

 John T
 eServices For You



 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe,

 just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe,

 just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at 

Re: [Declude.Virus] Strange behavior

2005-05-13 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])




Does declude virus need any modification as 
such?

No...

Darrell
---invURIBL - Intelligent URI 
Filtering. Stops 85%+ SPAM with the defaultconfiguration. Download a 
copy today - http://www.invariantsystems.com



Re: [Declude.Virus] AV Gateway for external Customer

2005-05-12 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Alex, 

Also make sure you add their mail servers address in the relay for ip 
address options in smtp.. 

Everything else you mentioned from the Declude side is correct and what we 
do. 

Darrell
-
invURIBL - Intelligent URI filtering plug-in for Declude.  Stops 85%+ of all 
SPAM with default configuration.  Try it today - 
http://www.invariantsystems.com 

Hirthe, Alexander writes: 

Hello, 

I want to provide Declude Services for a customer with his own Dominio
Mailserver. Do I only need the Host entry and I'm done?
I found http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19980116-DM01.htm
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19980116-DM01.htm  

At the moment the MX records are pointing to the customer's SMTP Security
Gateway.
In future they will/should point to our mailserver, and I'll create a
declude subdirectory for them \declude\customer.domain\$default$.JunkMail 

Did I forget anything? I sounds to easy :-) 

Alex 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] High CPU F-Prot

2005-04-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Matt, 

I am seeing the same thing - but my server (this one) is way more loaded 
than it should.  Scanner 2 is F-Prot as you can see there is an excessive 
amount of time when this issue occurs.  It was so bad that I ended up 
disabling F-Prot until I can get to the bottom of this. 

Darrell 

04/27/2005 01:33:51 Q24299D44015460F4 MIME file: readme.zip [base64; 
Length=56586 Checksum=6993656]
04/27/2005 01:33:51 Q24299D44015460F4 Banning file readme.zip.
04/27/2005 01:33:51 Q24299D44015460F4 Forging virus found: Likely forged 
sender was [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/27/2005 01:33:51 Q24299D44015460F4 Scanner 1: Virus= the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Attachment= [12] O
04/27/2005 01:34:39 Q24299D44015460F4 Could not find parse string Infection: 
in report.txt
04/27/2005 01:34:39 Q24299D44015460F4 File(s) are INFECTED [ the 
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 8] 

Darrell 

Matt writes: 

After further review, I'm pretty sure that there is an F-Prot issue going 
on here. 

My server hasn't been hitting 100% yet today, and I also haven't seen any 
F-Prot timeouts, however I have found more compelling evidence that there 
is an issue with F-Prot that would probably lead to timeouts if the load 
was heavy while some messages were scanned.  I searched my logs today for 
examples of where McAfee found Mytob, but F-Prot didn't detect anything.  
There were a fair number of examples, and in every one, F-Prot took an 
uncharacteristically long time to scan the file.  Here are three examples 
that are marked with the gap corresponding to the F-Prot delays: 

   04/28/2005 05:49:04 QB18D740700A83968 MIME file: document.scr
   [base64; Length=52224 Checksum=6533396]
   04/28/2005 05:49:04 QB18D740700A83968 Invalid SCR Vulnerability
   04/28/2005 05:49:04 QB18D740700A83968 Banning file with SCR
   extension [application/octet-stream].
   *--- 6 second gap where F-Prot scans message ---*
   04/28/2005 05:49:10 QB18D740700A83968 Could not find parse string
   Infection:  in report.txt
   04/28/2005 05:49:11 QB18D740700A83968 Scanner 2: Virus=the
   W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Attachment=document.scr [0] O
   04/28/2005 05:49:11 QB18D740700A83968 File(s) are INFECTED [the
   W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 13]
   04/28/2005 05:49:11 QB18D740700A83968 Deleting file with virus
   04/28/2005 05:49:11 QB18D740700A83968 Deleting E-mail with virus!
   04/28/2005 05:49:11 QB18D740700A83968 Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS
   [MIME: 2 54788]
   04/28/2005 05:49:11 QB18D740700A83968 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [outgoing from 12.152.254.47]
   04/28/2005 05:49:11 QB18D740700A83968 Subject: MAIL TRANSACTION FAILED 

   04/28/2005 09:09:41 QE095EDCB006E8802 MIME file: doc.zip [base64;
   Length=55408 Checksum=6875560]
   *--- 4 second gap where F-Prot scans message ---*
   04/28/2005 09:09:45 QE095EDCB006E8802 Could not find parse string
   Infection:  in report.txt
   04/28/2005 09:09:46 QE095EDCB006E8802 Scanner 2: Virus=the
   W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Attachment= [0] O
   04/28/2005 09:09:46 QE095EDCB006E8802 File(s) are INFECTED [the
   W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 13]
   04/28/2005 09:09:46 QE095EDCB006E8802 Deleting file with virus
   04/28/2005 09:09:46 QE095EDCB006E8802 Deleting E-mail with virus!
   04/28/2005 09:09:46 QE095EDCB006E8802 Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS
   [MIME: 2 55605]
   04/28/2005 09:09:46 QE095EDCB006E8802 From: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [outgoing from 208.7.179.200]
   04/28/2005 09:09:46 QE095EDCB006E8802 Subject: hello 

   04/28/2005 09:47:55 QE98BF4DC00DA98FB MIME file: data.scr [base64;
   Length=56320 Checksum=6982245]
   04/28/2005 09:47:55 QE98BF4DC00DA98FB Invalid SCR Vulnerability
   04/28/2005 09:47:55 QE98BF4DC00DA98FB Banning file with SCR
   extension [application/octet-stream].
   *--- 9 second gap where F-Prot scans message ---*
   04/28/2005 09:48:04 QE98BF4DC00DA98FB Could not find parse string
   Infection:  in report.txt
   04/28/2005 09:48:05 QE98BF4DC00DA98FB Scanner 2: Virus=the
   W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Attachment=data.scr [0] O
   04/28/2005 09:48:05 QE98BF4DC00DA98FB File(s) are INFECTED [the
   W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 13]
   04/28/2005 09:48:05 QE98BF4DC00DA98FB Deleting file with virus
   04/28/2005 09:48:05 QE98BF4DC00DA98FB Deleting E-mail with virus!
   04/28/2005 09:48:05 QE98BF4DC00DA98FB Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS
   [MIME: 2 56551]
   04/28/2005 09:48:05 QE98BF4DC00DA98FB From: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [outgoing from 208.7.179.200]
   04/28/2005 09:48:05 QE98BF4DC00DA98FB Subject: Good day 

I'm virtually certain that this is what was happening yesterday, but under 
heavier load, F-Prot was taking longer to scan the messages than the 30 
seconds that I allow it to.  There are no other long delays like this that 
I can find.  F-Prot based on past testing should detect a typical virus in 
100 ms on my system, but it is not only taking much more time to scan a 
very small file, it is also missing the virus. 

I suspect that this is happening on other systems, but the 

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed)

2005-04-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Title: Message



Andrew,

During your test what did the CPU look like was it 
a solid 100%? I have not ran the test, but on my mail server when I was 
seeing the issue live it was 100%.

Darrell
---DLAnalyzer - Comprehensive 
reporting for Declude Junkmail and Virus. Try it out - http://www.invariantsystems.com

- Original Message - 

  From: 
  Colbeck, 
  Andrew 
  To: Declude.Virus@declude.com 
  Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:18 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot 
  missing viruses and is slow (renamed)
  
  I 
  downloaded and manually scanned the file with F-Prot and McAfee multiple 
  times.
  
  Desktop, WXP SP2, P4, 2.8 GHz
  F-Prot -5 seconds
  McAfee -0.4 seconds
  
  
  Server, W2K SP4, P3, 866 Hz
  F-Prot -10.1 seconds
  McAfee -1.21 seconds
  
  F-Prot is indeed returning an errorlevel of 8 on this, and it's 
  definitely way out of line with the scanning time on this 
  file.
  
  I'm 
  enclosing the batch file I use to manually scan (and not clean) files. I 
  monkeyed with all of the documented options and could not reduce the F-Prot 
  scanning time. On the bright side, reviewing the parameters revealed 
  that if you're not mindful and specify both the /type and /dumb options, the 
  last one in the line wins (oops, I did that in my virus.cfg). Also, I 
  learned that /packed is always on.
  
  I'm 
  going to check for a similarmalware detection, and submit it to F-Prot 
  as a bug.
  
  I 
  did get a reply on my previous report to them (after 6 days); they brought my 
  request to the attention of the developers, but then reminded me that any 
  non-zero return code is "undesirable". The request was to re-classify 
  Mitglieder from "suspicious" to "virus" so that I could get the correct return 
  code and thus the correct handling in my Declude Virus.
  
  Andrew 8)
  
  p.s. 
  I use the TimeThis.exe command line utility from Microsoftto get 
  sub-second intervals in batch files.
  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
  Behalf Of MattSent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 3:13 
  PMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: [Declude.Virus] 
  F-Prot missing viruses and is slow (renamed)
  Ok, I've captured one of these 
files and confirmed from a manual scan that it is still taking an excessive 
amount of time...but wait, there's more. The report.txt file that it 
creates shows that it detected Mytob, but every test where I send this to 
myself in E-mail results in no virus detected by F-Prot using VIRUSCODE 3, 
6, 8, 9 or 10. I haven't gone as far as coding something up that can 
capture the exit code from the command line yet, but I would be curious what 
if any was returned.Here's what Declude Virus shows for this file 
when I send it to myself:
04/28/2005 17:40:57 Q58666795008E87C7 MIME file: 
  [text/html][7bit; Length=695 Checksum=54365]04/28/2005 
  17:40:57 Q58666795008E87C7 MIME file: doc.zip [base64; Length=56432 
  Checksum=6987426]--- 10 second gap while F-Prot scans 
  ---04/28/2005 17:41:07 Q58666795008E87C7 Could not find 
  parse string Infection: in report.txt04/28/2005 
  17:41:08 Q58666795008E87C7 Scanner 2: Virus=the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Attachment= [0] I04/28/2005 17:41:08 Q58666795008E87C7 
  File(s) are INFECTED [the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 
  13]04/28/2005 17:41:08 Q58666795008E87C7 Scanned: 
  CONTAINS A VIRUS [Prescan OK][MIME: 3 57490]04/28/2005 
  17:41:08 Q58666795008E87C7 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [incoming from 
  192.168.100.100]04/28/2005 17:41:08 Q58666795008E87C7 
  Subject: [Fwd: Mail Delivery System]Here's a link 
to the virus for those that might want to test it out for themselves. 
Turn off your real-time virus scanner, right click the file and press save 
as, and rename it as doc.zip (it's not really a text file).
http://administration.mailpure.com/virus/doc.txtHere's 
the command line for F-Prot that I was using with the file located in 
C:\test\doc.zip:
C:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\fpcmd.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOBOOT /NOMEM 
  /ARCHIVE=5 /PACKED /DUMB /REPORT=C:\test\report.txt 
C:\test\doc.zipHere's the output from the report.txt file 
when manually scanned:
Virus scanning report - 28 April 2005 @ 
  17:45F-PROT ANTIVIRUSProgram version: 3.16bEngine version: 
  3.16.6VIRUS SIGNATURE FILESSIGN.DEF created 28 April 
  2005SIGN2.DEF created 28 April 2005MACRO.DEF created 20 April 
  2005Search: C:\test\doc.zipAction: Report onlyFiles: 
  "Dumb" scan of all filesSwitches: /ARCHIVE /PACKED /SERVER 
  /REPORT=C:\test\report.txt /SILENT /NOBOOT /NOMEMMemory was not 
  scanned.Hard disk boot sectors were not 
  scanned.C:\test\doc.zip-doc.scr-(Packed) is a 
  security risk named W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]Results of virus 
  scanning:Files: 1MBRs: 0Boot sectors: 0Objects 

[Declude.Virus] High CPU F-Prot

2005-04-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
In the last 24 hours I have seen F-Prot start to use an excessive amount of 
CPU.  Normally it very rarely shows up in task manager and now it has been 
using a considerable amount of CPU. 

Thoughts?
Darrell 


Comprehensive Declude Virus and Junkmail reporting with DLAnalyzer - 
http://www.invariantsystems.com
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] High CPU F-Prot

2005-04-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 Scanner 2: Virus=the 
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Attachment= [0] O04/27/2005 15:03:38 QE1E8CDE50080D601 
File(s) are INFECTED [the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 13]04/27/2005 15:03:38 
QE1E8CDE50080D601 Deleting file with virus04/27/2005 15:03:38 
QE1E8CDE50080D601 Deleting E-mail with virus!04/27/2005 15:03:38 
QE1E8CDE50080D601 Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS [MIME: 2 70364]04/27/2005 
15:03:38 QE1E8CDE50080D601 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [outgoing from 
208.7.179.200]04/27/2005 15:03:38 QE1E8CDE50080D601 Subject: 
hello04/27/2005 17:50:01 Q08DE5B0200CC296E MIME file: test.exe 
[base64; Length=64512 Checksum=7880003]04/27/2005 17:50:01 
Q08DE5B0200CC296E Banning file with EXE extension 
[application/octet-stream].04/27/2005 17:50:31 Q08DE5B0200CC296E ERROR: 
Virus scanner 1 didn't finish after 30 seconds; terminating.04/27/2005 
17:50:32 Q08DE5B0200CC296E Scanner 2: Virus=the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Attachment=test.exe [0] O04/27/2005 17:50:32 Q08DE5B0200CC296E File(s) 
are INFECTED [the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 13]04/27/2005 17:50:32 
Q08DE5B0200CC296E Deleting file with virus04/27/2005 17:50:32 
Q08DE5B0200CC296E Deleting E-mail with virus!04/27/2005 17:50:32 
Q08DE5B0200CC296E Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS [MIME: 2 64690]04/27/2005 
17:50:32 Q08DE5B0200CC296E From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [outgoing from 
12.152.254.47]04/27/2005 17:50:32 Q08DE5B0200CC296E Subject: 
Hello04/27/2005 17:50:29 Q08E35B0200CC2989 MIME file: file.zip 
[base64; Length=64774 Checksum=7891080]04/27/2005 17:50:59 
Q08E35B0200CC2989 ERROR: Virus scanner 1 didn't finish after 30 seconds; 
terminating.04/27/2005 17:51:01 Q08E35B0200CC2989 Scanner 2: Virus=the 
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Attachment= [0] O04/27/2005 17:51:01 Q08E35B0200CC2989 
File(s) are INFECTED [the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 13]04/27/2005 17:51:01 
Q08E35B0200CC2989 Deleting file with virus04/27/2005 17:51:01 
Q08E35B0200CC2989 Deleting E-mail with virus!04/27/2005 17:51:01 
Q08E35B0200CC2989 Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS [MIME: 2 64952]04/27/2005 
17:51:01 Q08E35B0200CC2989 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [outgoing from 
12.152.254.47]04/27/2005 17:51:01 Q08E35B0200CC2989 Subject: 
VzvqvwnocdebkjMarkus Gufler wrote: 
  11:59pm here so it's not a good time to watch the cpu usage as most people
has leaved the office some hours ago. Time to say good night for me too
after haven't seen anything strange with f-prot on my server at the moment.
|-)

Markus


  
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:53 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] High CPU F-Prot

I saw F-Prot time out 3 times today in my logs, and I can't 
remember that ever happening before.  McAfee didn't time out 
once, and that's usually the first to go.  Maybe this 
explains the issue.  I think it's time to so some performance 
monitoring to see what is up.

Matt



Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:


  In the last 24 hours I have seen F-Prot start to use an excessive 
amount of CPU.  Normally it very rarely shows up in task 
  manager and 

  now it has been using a considerable amount of CPU.
Thoughts?
Darrell

Comprehensive Declude Virus and Junkmail reporting with 
  DLAnalyzer - 

  http://www.invariantsystems.com
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To 
  unsubscribe, 

  just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


  --
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To 
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


  -- 
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=


Re: [Declude.Virus] Revisiting the McAfee command line arguments

2005-04-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])



/PANALYZE - Turn on program heuristics.

I have been running this switch for a while and 
have not seen any issues with it. I turned it on as a result of the jpeg 
exploit - see http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.virus@declude.com/msg10831.html

Darrell
--
Comprehensive reporting on Declude Junkmail and 
Virus with DLAnalyzer - http://www.invariantsystems.com

Darrell



Re: [Declude.Virus] Revisiting the McAfee command line arguments

2005-04-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
improved. If a virus is found with scanner 1, I'd like an option to avoid
calling later scanners. While it's good for comparison sakes, if a virus
is found, I don't need 2 other programs to confirm that.
I'd also like to have the PRESCAN ON/OFF setting moved within the virus
scanner definitions. I could then have one of the scanners scan all of the
e-mail, and the less effective scanner would run a Prescan

I have to agree 100% with this.  The option to bypass other scanners when a
virus is found would be a great option to have.

Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail.  IMail Queue Monitoring, Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] OT: Installing Sophos/Anti Virus

2005-04-20 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Not that this solves the issue, but what if you installed Sophos first? 

Darrell

invURIBL - Intelligent URI Filtering for Declude Junkmail.  Blocks 85% of 
SPAM with the default configurations.  Try it out - 
http://www.invariantsystems.com 

Aaron Moreau-Cook writes: 

All, 

I have a Imail Server on a Windows 2003 server with Declude Virus 1.82.  

We have been running with three virus scanners, McAfee VirusScan 7.1, F-Prot
3.16b, and Nod32. After having nothing but trouble with Nod32 crashing on
our system we decided to replace Nod32 with another scanner. 

We tried to install PC-Cillian, but it won't install on a Windows 2003
Server.
We tried to install Sophos, but it won't install because other Anti-Virus
applications are installed. 

So my question is, how do I get another third party scanner installed? How
has everyone else got Sophos installed on their systems? 

We'd like to use Sophos, but at this point I don't really care either way as
long as it is reliable and doesn't crash. 

Thanks, 

Aaron 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] BANnotify.eml

2005-04-15 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Without the attachments. 

Darrell 


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 

Robert Perez writes: 

I know this is a rookie question but anyway: 

Does BANnotify.eml file send the email with or without the attachment/s?

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] DLAnalyzer 4.1.0 Released

2005-04-12 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
DLAnalyzer 4.1.0 has been released.  Version 4.1.0 is compatible with the 
enhanced logging changes introduced with Declude version 4.0.6. 

DLAnalyzer is a comprehensive reporting tool that integrates both Junkmail 
and Virus statistics into one report.  Some of the features require the 
Enterprise or Standard version, but we also have a FREE LITE version 
available. 

Release Notes: http://www.invariantsystems.com/download/current/readme.txt 

Download: http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/download.asp 

We encourage all users of DLAnalyzer to upgrade to 4.1.0 as previous 
versions of DLAnalyzer will not work correctly with the new logging format 
of Declude 2.0.6. 

Any questions let me know,
Darrell 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude Update - Version 2.0.6

2005-03-30 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Mark, 

As one of the testers I can say 2.0.6 is for Imail as well. 

Darrell 

Mark E. Smith writes: 

Will this version work with iMail as well? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 9:48 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Declude Update - Version 2.0.6 

We are in the final stages of getting version 2.0.6 ready for
release. 

We are completing the:
.	Code reviews
.	Documentation
.	Release notes
.	Packaging 

We expect to have the software available for general release
week beginning April 4. 

Barry 

Barry Simpson
www.declude.com
Office (866) 332-5833 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] New virus new__price.zip

2005-03-01 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I am seeing it detected as Bagle.BL by F-Prot.  It is not being detected 
by Mcafee right now. 

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 

Markus Gufler writes: 

Seems there is something going on, please check your virus logs. 

... 

Markus 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] F-prot help

2005-02-18 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Title: F-prot help



Mark,

When you say "on access is set to on" and then 
below that you mentioned the realtime scanner was not installed. Do you 
have an on access virus scanner running? Even one other than F-Prot that 
may be scanning your server?

Darrell
---Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Mark Gordon 
  To: Declude.Virus@declude.com 
  Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 2:44 
  PM
  Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-prot 
help
  
  This has been hashed out before and I checked the 
  archive. I cannot get my installation of declude to work. 
  This is my config: 
  C:\scanners\fprot\fpcmd.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOMEM 
  /ARCHIVE=3 /NOBOOT /DUMB REPORT=report.txt VIRUSCODE 3 VIRUSCODE 6 
  VIRUSCODE 8 REPORT Infection: 
  On access is set to On. 
  Here is my error. I have reinstalled f-prot twice. 
  The scheduler and realtime scanners have not been installed. 
  02/18/2005 14:25:30 Q412a0025005613ea 1 [1 of 2 not 
  deleted] files were deleted; assuming external virus scanner found a 
  virus
  02/18/2005 14:25:30 Q412a0025005613ea File(s) are 
  INFECTED [: 13] 02/18/2005 14:25:30 
  Q412a0025005613ea Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS [MIME: 1 883] 02/18/2005 14:25:30 Q412a0025005613ea From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [incoming from 
  206.27.11.13]
  02/18/2005 14:25:30 Q412a0025005613ea 
  Subject: virustest-1 
  It used to give the name of the virus and now 
  nothing. 


Re: [Declude.Virus] log question

2005-01-26 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Thomas,

The line you are looking for is the "Last Action" 
line. The line you posted means the message triggered the ipnotinmx test 
which normally is not used to punish messages. This message had a total 
weight of -5. From the information provided Declude did not toss that 
message. You need to now search your Imail logs and see if what happened 
next. If you post more log snippets it might shed some more 
light.

Darrell
---Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Thomas Doxtater 
  To: declude.virus@declude.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 6:11 
  PM
  Subject: [Declude.Virus] log 
  question
  
  Hi 
  all,
  
  We had some 
  problems with a spam assassin box filling up over the past weekend and, 
  needless to say, it caused some grief with mail delivery. The problem I'm 
  having presently is that there are a few legitimate emails that got logged in 
  Imail and declude, but didn't get delivered properly. Here is a snip from the 
  declude log (I think) highlighting one of the emails.
  
  10:53:34 
  Q850dc49c00d6246c Tests failed [weight=-5]: IPNOTINMX=IGNORE 
  CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE 
  
  I'm not sure 
  exactly what I'm looking at, or if this is the cause of why the message didn't 
  get delivered. If I'm reading this right, it seems that the message failed the 
  listed tests and was tossed. If that's the case, did it get put into a folder 
  I can recover it from or no?
  
  Thanks for your 
  help,
  
  Thomas Doxtater
  Systems Administrator
  Finishline Studios
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Office: 
608.253.4088


Re: [Declude.Virus] Virtual domains

2005-01-14 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Yes it does. 

Darrell 


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

Chris Hunt writes: 

My company is merging with another printing company (they are moving in 
w/us) 

I setup a virtual domain for their old domain and also the new domain.  
Email is flowing just fine. 

Does declude AV protect virtual domains? 

Chris 

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/F-Prot AV] 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


  1   2   >