Will someone volunteer to update the jhbuild moduleset?
Thanks-
Luis
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:37:10 +0100, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 09:09 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
Morning all,
The release team has agreed on a final modules list proposal, if there is
I support this strongly; I understand the conceptual model behind
putting run application... in Applications but it totally doesn't fit
with anything else we do.
Luis
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:19:05 -0500, Bryan Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey ~
I'm requesting a break in the 2.10 freeze for
I can't comment on the doc implications, but it seems like a useful
fix to me and would make the foot menu more useful than it currently
is.
Luis
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:13:03 +0100 (CET), Vincent Untz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
The main menu needs some updates since right now, it's
OK, all... we've been nagging about the showstoppers for a while now
and had medium-to-poor success on them. By my count:
http://tinyurl.com/657ob
We're now down to 7, one or two of which are puntable, but many of
which are extremely embarassing and some of which even have patches.
Yes, some of
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:17:08 +0700, Ross Golder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 10:43 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
122150 gnome-termnal 2.4.0.1 won't redraw text lines properly-
redrawing is broken and has been for a long time. Given that vte is
defacto unmaintained
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:35:28 -0700, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:43:35 -0500, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bug we have a handle on- go elijah go!
166722: gnome_url_show needs to use startup-notification and take a
timestamp parameter- basically
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 02:57:25 +0100, Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El mar, 01-03-2005 a las 17:46 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru escribió:
Just as I was testing the Simple theme earlier with gnome-themes 2.9.92 on
Arch Linux, the following happens, on
1/2.
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 17:02:12 +0100, Ronald S. Bultje
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=169021 contains a fix for a
potential crasher that several people reported for RC1. It's a two-line
fix. The issue is that request pages 1-4 from a list,
I would point out that if you want to discuss actual market research
(/not/ online polling) then the discussion could be continued on
marketing-list. /no/ part of the discussion is d-d-l appropriate.
Luis
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:55:24 -0700, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar
On 4/23/05, William Jon McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* include a version/equivalent of flurry screensaver
* include a version/equivalent of glslideshow screensaver
Are you not just wrapping the xscreensaver hacks? I thought that was
what KDE had done?
Luis
So... does anyone think it would be insane to put servers (hula,
asterisk, jabber) on the liveCD and have the gnome tools point at
them?
Would anyone volunteer to look into this? :)
Luis
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Someone with more perl-fu than me- would it be possible to set up a
script to watch cvs-commits list and send this kind of mail out
automatically, or just update a webpage somewhere? Making maintainers
do this manually (and remember to do it automatically) seems sort of
crap...
Luis (Jeff can't
On 6/8/05, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
I guess there's quite a few benefits/risks to be weighed up here:
- The benefit of having cool new rendering stuff in GNOME 2.12
- The benefit of being able to use all the other new APIs in GTK+
2.8 for GNOME 2.12
On 6/8/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/8/05, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
I guess there's quite a few benefits/risks to be weighed up here:
- The benefit of having cool new rendering stuff in GNOME 2.12
- The benefit of being able to use all
On 6/9/05, Jon K Hellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:39 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
If we're talking about performance/stability in the context of whether
GNOME 2.12 should use GTK+ 2.8, we're effectively saying I think the
GTK+ team might ship a unstable or
I think there seems to be a very strong consensus that ggv/gpdf should
be replaced by evince in 2.12. Does anyone object to me going ahead
and removing them from the jhbuild moduleset and adding evince?
Luis
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
On 6/9/05, Jon K Hellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 10:49 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
first 'column' of times is gtk 2.6, second is gtk/cairo HEAD of
yesterday, both with the Mist theme:
GtkEntry - time: 0.43 0.76
GtkComboBox - time: 12.61 15.30
GtkComboBoxEntry
On 6/9/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/9/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/9/05, Jon K Hellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:39 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
If we're talking about performance/stability in the context of
whether
On 6/10/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't seen this announced on gtk-devel or here, so:
http://gtkperf.sourceforge.net/
Apparently this is a test tool to test gtk performance. Would be great
to have someone test 2.7 with it.
Went ahead and did it myself
On 6/10/05, Alexander Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 09:40 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 6/10/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't seen this announced on gtk-devel or here, so:
http://gtkperf.sourceforge.net/
Apparently this is a test
[Moving this off r-t to a broader group that might have more feedback on this :)
On 6/10/05, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, June 10, 2005 15:22, Ross Burton said:
I think the release team need to make a statement about what version of
DBus is to be used for any code which can
On 6/10/05, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 19:00 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
- To be realistic, if GNOME-2.12 is released after GTK+-2.8,
most distributors are going to ship using them together.
So, the release team could decide to go with 2.6 even with
On 6/10/05, John (J5) Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:23 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
[Moving this off r-t to a broader group that might have more feedback on
this :)
On 6/10/05, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, June 10, 2005 15:22, Ross Burton said
On 6/10/05, Owen Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:21 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
But the last time we rushed out a gtk-gnome paired release, and got
ourselves locked into the new APIs so that we couldn't back out, the
result was that any distro actually paying
Seems to me that gnome-keyring-manager should at a minimum go into
meta-gnome-proposed in jhbuild*, and seems (to me) to fill a fairly
important need for key management, and should probably be in 2.12.
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
For reference, it wasn't in 2.8 because of issues addressed
On 6/10/05, Kristian Høgsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please note that I think we should include evince in GNOME, replacing
gpdf and ggv. I'm only saying that maybe is better disable by now
poppler's cairo backend: this will produce sometimes a less sexy
rendering, but it's fast and with
On 10 Jun 2005 15:33:58 -0400, Jonathan Blandford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 6/10/05, Kristian Høgsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With my testing hat on, I couldn't agree more. :) I assume you mean
make it the default in the next evince release
So since I've been whining about building gtk 2.7 and stack, and of
course had only attempted a couple times to build it (and all had
failed) I thought I'd poke at tinderbox-y bits this weekend. Some Luis
Network News-y[1] bits:
* the nss install stuff is still sort of hosed when building against
On 6/12/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* the nss install stuff is still sort of hosed when building against
firefox, but I have a patch: see
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154213
I should add that I'd greatly appreciate it if a couple other people
could apply this patch
On 6/13/05, Cédric Marcone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hal doesn't build in jhbuild beacuse dbus didn't install
dbus-gtype-specialized.h in $prefix/include/dbus-1.0/dbus
I don't have any install-fu magic, so no patch : sorry ;)
Yeah, a commit from Colin Walters (applying a patch from Ross
And the tinderbox succeeds now (at least, hal does :). Thanks...
Luis
On 6/13/05, Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 12:42 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
Hackish patch to fix this attached. Expect something similar and some
other patches which slipped through the
On 6/14/05, Ryan McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-14-06 at 08:22 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
The problem is that newer pkg-config's pkg.m4 caches PKG_CHECK_MODULES()
...
James.
Having had quite a few pains myself when trying to build gnome from
jhbuild, I wonder
On 6/14/05, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 à 11:57 +0200, Sebastien Bacher a écrit :
Le vendredi 10 juin 2005 à 13:10 -0400, Luis Villa a écrit :
Each of the major distributors could
(should?) package 2.7.0
I've put .deb packages (i386) of the current
On 6/16/05, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16 Jun 2005, at 12:47, Luis Villa wrote:
If someone could *finally* wrap that in a GUI (ideally, I guess, as
part of the existing keybinding dialog) that would be a nice 2.12
feature.
Well, we still do this in JDS... I know
Popping heads up on this tread again- Jonathan, Jody, what will it
take to get this patch in for 2.12?
On 6/17/05, Erwann Chenede [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The functionality (for custom keybindings) was added the 2002-05-22 in
gnome-settings-daemon.
If anybody is interested by the UI in JDS 3
On 6/30/05, Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 11:07 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Popping heads up on this tread again- Jonathan, Jody, what will it
take to get this patch in for 2.12?
Hasn't Sebastien Bacher taken Jonathan's place in the g-c-c maintainers?
News
Narrator: In A.D. 2005, build was beginning.
Captain: What happen ?
Mechanic: someone[2] set the build up the bomb!
Operator: We get signal.
Captain: What !
Operator: Main screen turn on.
[1] yes, i'm having fun rehashing old memes. Don't like it, find a new
buildbitch ;)
[2] by
Hrm. half-assed funny emails are better when they actually get
finished before they get sent. Blah...
Anyway, build output coming shortly- accidentally nuked the error and
am now rebuilding to double-check.
Luis
On 7/10/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Narrator: In A.D. 2005, build
Hey, guys- if I wanted to test this:
(1) what would I need to do to set it up, exactly? (presume that I
have all of GNOME running from source, and can patch as needed.)
(2) how could I tell if it succeeded/failed? What are the
expectations, design goals, etc.? What new things should I be able to
On 7/11/05, John (J5) Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:14 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Hey, guys- if I wanted to test this:
(1) what would I need to do to set it up, exactly? (presume that I
have all of GNOME running from source, and can patch as needed.)
You just
On 7/10/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/10/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hrm. half-assed funny emails are better when they actually get
finished before they get sent. Blah...
Anyway, build output coming shortly- accidentally nuked the error and
am now rebuilding
On 7/12/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/10/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/10/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hrm. half-assed funny emails are better when they actually get
finished before they get sent. Blah...
Anyway, build output coming shortly
On 7/13/05, Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heya,
Dudes, you should work with Brian Cameron from Sun on this - I'm pretty
sure he'll pick up this thread, but he's done a HUGE amount of work in
this space already.
I personally think a step by step effort working down through your
On 7/13/05, Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that necessarily
going to please 100% of ISVs? No. (Possibly not even 50%.) Will it be
useful anyway? IMHO, yes. While we should definitely get Bryan's input
and attempt to accomodate it as much as practicable, lets please not
bog this
On 7/14/05, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 13 juillet 2005 à 19:56 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit :
Opinions?
Hi,
It seems pretty minimalistic, there is no UI to configure a
non-detectable printer by example (lp, smb, ...). Wouldn't
gnome-cups-manager be better
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lör 2005-07-09 klockan 22:54 +0200 skrev Christian Rose:
fre 2005-06-10 klockan 13:53 -0400 skrev Luis Villa:
Seems to me that gnome-keyring-manager should at a minimum go into
meta-gnome-proposed in jhbuild*, and seems (to me) to fill a fairly
important need
So, I'm now tinderboxing with 'make check' turned on.
This is good, in that we have more testing. Maintainers who do not
immediately start writing tests which run on make check are
poopieheads. :) [2]
This is bad, in that lots of things are failing right now. I plan to
file bugs on these as
And by winner, I mean LOSAH.
tinderbox, having guessed that the magic word was 'dbus', was given
the appetizing choice of door #1, door #2, or door #842, chose #842.
Looking behind door #842:
http://cvs.freedesktop.org/dbus/dbus/ChangeLog?rev=1.842view=markup
means we did not get the car behind
On 7/15/05, Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 23:55 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
And by winner, I mean LOSAH.
tinderbox, having guessed that the magic word was 'dbus', was given
the appetizing choice of door #1, door #2, or door #842, chose #842.
Looking behind
On 7/15/05, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 06:05, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
http://primates.ximian.com/~federico/news-2005-07.html#14
Cool, needs a little HIG love though :)
- Alerts shouldn't have any titlebar text
Is this, or is this not, an a11y
be in the style of Dr. Seuss. And that would cause him to roll
over in his grave. And no one would like that, would they?
On 7/14/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I'm now tinderboxing with 'make check' turned on.
This is good, in that we have more testing. Maintainers who do not
immediately
On 7/15/05, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 17:50 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
None of the other Great Monarchs have assumed power on this issue.
Thus I, as the GDP Fearless Leader, hereby declare this the new
default theme. I don't want a long discussion about
On 7/18/05, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 09:05 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
[I'm not opposed to 2.7 going in anymore- what bugs there are seem to
be getting fixed very promptly- so this is just for information.]
On 7/18/05, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED
Sadly, I have no entertainment or drugs for you today.
Currently:
* gnome-vfs
* e-d-s
* at-spi (because it isn't self-hosting; serious autotool guru-ness
may be needed here.)
are failing 'make check'.
bugs and traces:
On 7/18/05, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/18/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. It was suggested that I should 'make distcheck' in tinderbox.
Opinions?
Luis is cool for doing all this tinderbox work.
Heh. Thank James mostly; he wrote the code and I'm just
On 7/18/05, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:03 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 7/18/05, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/18/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. It was suggested that I should 'make distcheck' in tinderbox
On 7/18/05, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Luis Villa wrote:
build/distribute daily snapshots like we used to. Not sure if that is
worth the admitted pain of nagging/etc., especially since ATM no one
is offering to build daily snaps.
I'm willing to do
On 7/18/05, Andrew Sobala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 15:54 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 15:22 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 7/18/05, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Luis Villa wrote:
build/distribute daily
On 7/18/05, Ikke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 15:29 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
One way to go about is to require all involved modules to have an
RPM .spec file, and jhbuild can be instructed to build and
install RPMs, but most probably this will not be accepted
On 7/18/05, Rob Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
One way to go about is to require all involved modules to have an
RPM .spec file, and jhbuild can be instructed to build and
install RPMs, but most probably this will not be accepted
practice in GNOME. Or am I wrong?
On 7/18/05, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 20:23 +0200, Ikke wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:28 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
I think the advantages of adding make distcheck are bigger than the
disadvantages.
OK, but what are they? :)
Making sure
On 7/18/05, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Luis Villa
So, I think it should be doable, and more than useful!
Well, ATM, using a simple-but-possibly-wrong hack[1] 10 of the 18 gtk
dependencies fail distcheck.
Yeah, but those are way out of our scope. It's probably only
On 7/18/05, Ikke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:15 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:03 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 7/18/05, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/18/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. It was suggested
On 7/18/05, Danilo Šegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today at 18:56, Elijah Newren wrote:
Sane? Insane?
Does it matter? I think it'd be useful, though I'm betting libwnck
fails and I'll be unable to fix it (I wasn't able to last time I
tried, but thankfully people smarter than I are
'make distcheck' actually seems to work shockingly well (enough that
I'll probably try to run it once a day) but this bug:
Libwnck CVS HEAD fails to compile w/ --enable-gtk-doc
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302231
hoses things pretty badly, since libwnck is (indirectly) a dependency
On 7/19/05, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Luis Villa
shrug If we're going to throw massive tarballs over the wall, might as
well add the extra few megs and just make them debug from the start, no?
Luis (noting that he has no idea if this would actually *work
On 7/19/05, Dan Winship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 11:31 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 7/19/05, Alexander Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The naming of the packages could also be such that there is no chance of
conflicting with your vendor gnome, current version
On 7/21/05, Andrew Sobala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 14:49 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
But there is no reason to tarnish Gnome's reputation because some people
feel that Gtk 2.8 is too cool to wait. Shipping a slower, more fragile
version of Gnome and which in
On 7/21/05, Miguel de Icaza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
The QA team does not consider a GTK+ 2.8-based GNOME more fragile than a
2.6-based one. The QA team believes the issues involved in upgrading
this component of the GNOME desktop are no greater than upgrading any
other
On 7/21/05, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/21/05, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
6) I sent off my default theme declaration about a week ago.
Whatever the technical solution is, I need it to happen now.
We hit UI freeze in less than a week.
Hmm...hard to get people
move to bzr, svk, or something in that
vein to make the branching part of this manageable over the long term.
Or rather, we don't *have* to, but I don't envy the poor soul who
tries to do it with CVS.
Luis
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 00:22 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 7/22/05, Glynn Foster [EMAIL
On 7/22/05, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Federico,
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 22:58 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
I work in the desktop team at Novell, and a large part of my work
consists of maintaining NLD 9, which uses GNOME 2.6. When a bug comes
in for that
Honestly, any reason to wait to 2.14?
Luis
On 7/22/05, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
gnome-smproxy is a little program in gnome-session which acts as an
XSMP proxy for applications which don't support XSMP, but do support the
obsolete WM_SAVE_YOURSELF ICCCM protocol.
That would be awesome! It would be almost like:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110670
or maybe it would be like:
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-control-center/capplets/mouse/ChangeLog?rev=1.97view=markup
2005-07-10 Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
The release team met last week, and we talked a bit about the new
module stuff. As usual, we tried to understand and reflect the
community consensus as reflected in d-d-l and other forums, with the
understanding that sometimes we have to, you know, go ahead and decide
;)
In:
* evince: It's
Some things are sort of broken, and because I've been using the
tinderbox box as a liveCD build machine they haven't been caught.
Apologies if this ruins your plans to stay instead and play with HEAD
all day. :) Culprits so far:
* ORBit2
* gnome-applets xkb stuff
The direct committers have been
On 7/27/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some things are sort of broken, and because I've been using the
tinderbox box as a liveCD build machine they haven't been caught.
Apologies if this ruins your plans to stay instead and play with HEAD
all day. :) Culprits so far:
* ORBit2
On 7/27/05, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 17:49 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Punted to 2.13/2.14
* eggcups: this was pushed very late, and partially as a result there
* productivity/office suite: the discussions about where this would
I'm guessing gnome-power
On 7/27/05, Tor Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 12:25 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Also broken:
* gnome-vfs, since this commit:
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-vfs/ChangeLog?rev=1.2231view=markup
Should be fixed now. Sorry.
No problem, thanks for fixing.
Luis
On 7/28/05, Yavor Doganov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:25:01 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Similar with libgtop:
Fixed in CVS by Alexander Shopov. Apologies for this blunder.
Thanks, Yavor, Alexander. Much appreciated.
Luis (sparing you all for the weekend)
P.S. anyone
No energy to be funny this morning. Each of you should instead picture
me in a Cat In The Hat hat, reciting Dr. Seuss, but using lots of
words that rhyme with 'build' and 'tinderbox.'
Current culprits:
* mozilla, with gcc4, in the library:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=284386
On 8/14/05, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:16 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
* gnome-menus:
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-menus/ChangeLog?rev=1.133view=markup
causes:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/bb/microtinder/cvs/gnome-menus'
menu-monitor.c
It is. Thanks, Tor.
Luis
On 8/13/05, Tor Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope libgnomeprint is fixed now:
2005-08-14 Tor Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* libgnomeprint/filters/Makefile.am (install-exec-hook): Hack to
make make install work, especially in tinderbox-like
On 8/22/05, John (J5) Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 13:24 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
I wanted to post this to the dbus list, but I can't subscribe to it-
every address I try comes back invalid. So i'm posting here instead.
Dr. Seuss on managing software development
This is necessarily an incomplete list; if you know of a bug you
believe is a stopper, if in any doubt, please mail
gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org
We'll be looking for more of these in irc.gnome.org #bugs tomorrow-
find a showstopper in bugzilla or the code tomorrow, and I'll
personally... well, dunno,
It is sort of scaring me that we seem to be making very little
progress on even looking at some of these. We found four more at
bugday, though some (2, I think?) from the original list have also
been fixed.
New ones:
text documents just disappearing off the desktop :/
On 8/27/05, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 00:05 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
Thoughts? Should xrdb be turned off by default?
IMHO a much better solution would be to simply delay running xrdb
until after the splash screen
On 8/27/05, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Alex Graveley
My gut reaction is that you should disable it now, and reenable/cache xrdb
if user response is negative.
Turns out we've already disabled it and re-enabled it again because the user
response was negative. So... :-)
On 8/27/05, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Jeff Waugh
How about most people's Emacs?
And everything Tk, which covers a pretty surprising amount of software that
corporates like.
I'm still distinctly unconvinced the rest of us (that is, the vast
majority) should be paying a
On 28 Aug 2005 01:15:19 -0400, Jonathan Blandford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
print screen has cool new feature, that 100% crashes after you use it!
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309731
Feature's been there for a release.
Yes, I took poetic license with the details. ;)
I fixed
On 8/24/05, Andreas Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 24.08.2005, 13:26 +0200 schrieb Marcus Bauer:
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 06:42 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Some known issues, not all of which have known solutions ATM:
* Luis is a silly person and has not contacted Marcus
On 8/30/05, Callum McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gnome-games has been branched for gnome-2-12
gnome-2-12 is the stable branch
HEAD will become unstable (really, really, unstable) in a few days time
Care to share an outline of your plans for the next cycle? :)
Luis
On 8/31/05, Harish Krishnaswamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
The gnome-2-12 branch for Evolution and Evolution-Data-Server has been
created. This would be the stable branch for Evolution 2.4 and
Evolution-Data-Server 1.4
For action ahead on HEAD branch, check out
On 9/2/05, Danilo Šegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't forget to CC gnome-i18n and gnome-docs-list when creating
new branches, especially this close to a release, since we may still
work on HEAD not knowing that we need to switch!
The original post *was* sent to gnome-i18n; I just
On 9/5/05, Damien Sandras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello to all,
GnomeMeeting 1.2.2 has been uploaded to the GNOME FTP server for release
with GNOME 2.12.
It is a very minor bugfixes release. It contains several translations
updates.
I have created a gnome-2-12 branch. Development will
Cool! I've added some information and a link to this post to the roadmap:
http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap
Luis
On 9/5/05, Damien Sandras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sending again with the subscribed e-mail address and with more
information. Sorry for the duplicate.
In line with my other
On 9/14/05, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Having feature freeze two weeks after Christmas last year caused
some complaints. To
avoid something like that, we need to extend the schedule by a
week, shorten it by at
least 3 weeks, or do something even more drastic.
FWIW,
On 10/3/05, Alexander Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eel and Nautilus has been branched for 2.13. 2.12.x work go in the
gnome-2-12 branch.
Any interesting plans for 2.13/14?
Luis
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Any plans for 2.13? [Yes, I'm going to ask this every time I see one of these :)
Luis
On 10/4/05, Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sound Juicer has branched for development, stable branch is gnome-2-12
as expected.
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL
On 10/6/05, William Jon McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have branched nautilus-cd-burner. The stable branch is
gnome-2-12 and development continues on HEAD.
No big plans for GNOME 2.14 - just fixing bugs.
Anyone who has penciled in 'make gdm and screensaver rock my sox' for
2.14
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
