Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60#discussion_r169624837
--- Diff:
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/JUnitLauncherTask.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,508 @@
+package
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60#discussion_r169624475
--- Diff:
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/JUnitLauncherTask.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,508 @@
+package
On 19/02/18 1:37 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2018-02-15, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I'm now done with the initial goals that I had in mind for this
task. I've opened a PR[1] for review. I've included a manual for this
task and it can be currently found here[2]. I would suggest reading
the manual
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60
@bodewig, Thank you very much for the review. Based on the review comments,
I have updated the PR with additional separate commits (for easier reference).
I'll be squashing all these commits together
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60#discussion_r168983237
--- Diff:
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/AbstractJUnitResultFormatter.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+package
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60#discussion_r168983118
--- Diff:
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/AbstractJUnitResultFormatter.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+package
that. There are few PRs open, but except
for this one https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/62 I don't plan to
merge the rest given the nature of the changes. There's no release
instructions that I could find, so I am not sure what's going to be
involved in the actual release process.
-Jaikiran
On 17/02/18 12:51 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2018-02-15, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I'm now done with the initial goals that I had in mind for this
task. I've opened a PR[1] for review. I've included a manual for this
task and it can be currently found here[2]. I would suggest reading
the manual
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/62
Hi @reudismam, Is there some reference documentation which states that this
construct performs better? My brief check of the JLS just showed a note which
states that some implementations _might_
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/62
this is ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
I just realized that the manual that I linked in my mail isn't
accessible to everyone. So here's an alternative link to the same
https://home.apache.org/~jaikiran/temp_workspace/manual/Tasks/junitlauncher.html
-Jaikiran
On 15/02/18 7:21 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I'm now done with the initial
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/61
Thank for you the PR. This is now merged
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/61
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/61
this is ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
the regressions that we have found in our latest releases.
-Jaikiran
On 15/02/18 7:21 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I'm now done with the initial goals that I had in mind for this task.
I've opened a PR[1] for review. I've included a manual for this task
and it can be currently found here[2]. I would
n memory, during the report writing
and will be immediately garbage collected once that's done.
Please review the PR - mostly the Ant specific constructs and
implementation details.
[1] https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60
[2]
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Jaikiran/ws/manual/Tasks/jun
GitHub user jaikiran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/60
JUnit 5 support - A new junitlauncher task
This is the initial working version of a new `junitlauncher` task that
support using JUnit 5 framework for testing, within Ant build files. The commit
I forgot to add that, as you note, as a result of the change, the new
created path will retain all elements from destPath that aren't in
dependClassPath, which is unlike the behaviour before the change.
-Jaikiran
On 14/02/18 9:59 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hi Stefan,
You are right. The change
indeed introduces a different behaviour.
[1]
https://github.com/jaikiran/ant/commit/f57b9d5fbca6e9648695bc9d37a27000c0b4aff2#diff-585ed59cf64ef6930e5148094adc322aR21
-Jaikiran
On 13/02/18 11:20 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I'm currently reviewing the big change that introduced
the RC, so that issues like these can hopefully
be caught before we actually do a release.
[1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional
Thanks everyone for the inputs. Based on those, I have now updated the
test to not expect a build failure exception and also have updated our
release notes to mention this change in behaviour.
-Jaikiran
On 09/02/18 11:00 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Jaikiran,
just to avoid duplicate work, I'm
Sure Stefan.
-Jaikiran
On 09/02/18 11:00 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Jaikiran,
just to avoid duplicate work, I'm currently running tests on the 1.9.x
branch where I fix a bunch a FileNameMapper implementations that
wouldn't handle null sourceFileNames (which could happen for resources
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/57
@adamretter, this is now merged and we have added your name (Adam Retter)
to our contributors list. If you want us to a use different name or not include
the name at all, please do let us know
://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39960
[6]
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Matrix-1.9.x-Linux/OS=xenial,jdk=JDK%201.5%20(latest)/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/src.tests.antunit.taskdefs/copy-test_xml/testResourceWithoutName/
-Jaikiran
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/62#discussion_r167136873
--- Diff:
src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/resolver/AbstractPatternsBasedResolver.java ---
@@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ protected ResolvedResource
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/68
There will be one soon. There's a discussion going on, in the mailing list
to work towards a release soon.
---
-
To unsubscribe
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/66
@javabrett, thank you reporting as well as providing the fix for this. This
is now merged.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/57
Looks good to me. If @bodewig doesn't have any concerns with this change,
I'll go ahead and merge this, this week
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/59
Thanks for the PR @jpountz. Can we add you to our contributors file,
crediting you for this fix? If yes, what would you like your name to be
mentioned
On 06/02/18 10:10 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2018-02-06, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
The PR build on Jenkins is backed by the github PR integration
plugin[1]. One of the features of that plugin is to prevent some
malicious/rogue PR (imagine someone creating a PR with code which does
some odd things
amount of bug fixes that have been done since 2.4.0 and I think we
should start looking at what it takes to do the release formalities.
-Jaikiran
On 09/01/18 12:29 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hi Jan,
My efforts to resolve IVY-1485 have taken longer than I expected,
mainly due to not finding enough
and see if it solves the issue?
-Jaikiran
On 09/01/18 5:53 PM, Maarten Coene wrote:
The change to the URLHandler class (TimoutConstraint) is also backwards
incompatible.The IvyIdea plugin (IntelliJ) breaks on this which contains an
extension of AbstractURLHandler.
I didn't look into it yet
Maybe the new task is worth highlighting. But other than
that I don't have anything specific.
-Jaikiran
On 06/02/18 11:18 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
as you can witness in
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/site/ant/sources/antnews.xml?r1=1823368=1823367=1823368
I don't really know
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/62#discussion_r166282397
--- Diff:
src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/resolver/AbstractPatternsBasedResolver.java ---
@@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ protected ResolvedResource
So it looks like, although I did send a mail about this PR integration a
while back[1], I did not include the details about this plugin which was
used for the integration. Sorry about that.
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ant.apache.org/msg46284.html
-Jaikiran
On 06/02/18 5:12 PM
g about github users who
belong to the apache organization.
P.S: There are a few other keywords that the plugin recognizes and is
documented at [1].
[1]
https://wiki.jenkins.io/display/JENKINS/GitHub+pull+request+builder+plugin
-Jaikiran
On 06/02/18 4:59 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/65
These changes don't solve the real issue. The details of this issue are
part of the discussion in ant dev mailing list, where I explained what the real
issue is. I do have a completely different
Just to be clear, my -1 was meant for both this commit as well as a
subsequent commit where some specific jars have been tagged as JPMS
modules. I think adding this automatic module names just for the sake of
it isn't a good thing.
-Jaikiran
On 06/02/18 9:38 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I agree
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/57
@adamretter The test failure
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Windows/37/testReport/junit/org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit/XMLResultAggregatorTest/testFrames/
looks related
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/58
Overall, IMO, this can't be a general find/replace change and instead needs
to be checked for individuals places where the `StringBuffer` is used and
whether the change to `StringBuilder` will impact
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/58#discussion_r166183671
--- Diff: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Parallel.java ---
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ public synchronized void run() {
}
// now
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/58#discussion_r166183611
--- Diff: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/listener/MailLogger.java ---
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
private static final String DEFAULT_MIME_TYPE = "text/
I agree. -1.
On a related note, I don't think we should be doing any of these commits
especially when there's a RC out which we plan to release. IMO, only
blocker issues need to be addressed when the RC is out.
-Jaikiran
On 06/02/18 1:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Generate manifest files
+1.
- Downloaded the .tar.gz and installed locally. Setup ANT_HOME to this
new version.
- Ran some existing projects against this new version
- Checked some documentation in the manual.
Tested the projects using this version of Ant against both Java 8 and
Java 9.
-Jaikiran
On 03/02/18
. Checked the presence of source files.
All above tests done on Java 8 setup.
-Jaikiran
On 03/02/18 10:02 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.9.10:
git tag: ANT_1_9_10_RC1
on commit: 528c94e
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant
I think we should use java.specification.version system property instead
which is the recommended one as per the JEP
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/223. We use this property in Ant too to
determine the Java version.
-Jaikiran
-
To u
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/56
this is ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
I just remembered - we probably have to investigate that image task test
failure on Java 9 and see if its some setup issue or whether that task is
genuinely broken against that runtime. I haven't yet found the time to dig
deeper on that one.
-Jaikiran
On Friday, January 26, 2018, Stefan Bodewig
One minor but important detail - this feature/task will only be
available in the 1.10.x releases (whichever release we decide to include
this in) and won't be available in 1.9.x releases of Ant.
-Jaikiran
On 27/01/18 8:40 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Here's an update on where this effort now
eedback reports)
For those of you curious to see what the task usage is going to look
like, here's an example[2] build file which shows its many usages. That
file will be cleaned up a bit, before I send a PR for review/merge.
[1] https://github.com/apache/ant/compare/master...jaikiran:junit5
that it can be used for the basic minimal functionality and then
keep adding anything more that we want in this task in future releases.
More details about this are in the other thread.
[1] https://github.com/apache/ant/compare/master...jaikir
are using
and the exception stacktrace that you got) and attach the proposed patch
there?
-Jaikiran
On 24/01/18 4:57 PM, Adam Retter wrote:
If you previously used the Saxon XSLT Processor within
you would get an error as the XSLT stylesheets
provided with Ant do not work with Saxon, they in fact
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/55
this is ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
.
-Jaikiran
On 22/01/18 10:21 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2018-01-21, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
I see three failures in ImageTest
testSimpleScale (did not create largeimage.jpg)
testSimpleScaleWithMapper (did not create largeimage-scaled.jpg)
testOverwriteTrue (negative time)
Could
to add especially
since the steps themselves are clear enough and this only just affects
the people who do the releases.
-Jaikiran
On 28/12/17 10:02 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi
over in https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/54 Gintas is proposing to
automate some of the steps needed to cut
Thanks Maarten, I'll look this.
-Jaikiran
On 09/01/18 5:53 PM, Maarten Coene wrote:
The change to the URLHandler class (TimoutConstraint) is also backwards
incompatible.The IvyIdea plugin (IntelliJ) breaks on this which contains an
extension of AbstractURLHandler.
I didn't look into it yet
Github user jaikiran closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/52
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/52
This is now commit to both master and 1.9.x branches
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/6c860e0036a8742f4cc35e3e6a8e595e42804c89
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/52
Thanks Stefan (@bodewig) for the review. The tests (existing and a new one
in this PR) are passing on both *nix and Windows. Given that this change does
address the issues noted in the referenced
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/52
@bodewig, do you think this change is OK? Any thoughts/concerns? I
understand that this is one of the central classes, so don't want to push this
if there's any concerns with this change
On 21/12/17 10:42 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-12-21, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I committed this change below, to use a resource collection to allow
the build to pass, which had started failing on Windows, after I did a
recent change to the delete task to use Java 7 java.nio.file.Files
API
s expected that it should work even with file="*.something" then
let me know, I'll undo this change and see how I can fix the regression.
-Jaikiran
On 21/12/17 10:21 AM, jaiki...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: ant
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 1a2c33fd0 -> ca91b859f
Fix a
No specific reason, just that I'm more used to using the javadoc variant
of @deprecated since it allows explaining what's deprecated and why. I
have now added the @Deprecated annotation too and pushed a commit.
-Jaikiran
On 20/12/17 11:08 PM, twogee wrote:
Github user twogee commented
On 19/12/17 5:13 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Looking at the JDK code, I still am not sure which exact code path
triggers this stale/invalid cache in this specific case, but
apparently it does.
Now that we know the canonical path cache is playing a role, I think the
only way this issue makes
[exec] [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
elapsed: 0.276 sec
-Jaikiran
On 19/12/17 5:02 PM, bode...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: ant
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master c2c821a38 -> 3dad11d41
disable a bunch of caches, just so we've tried that as w
which check that
file1 exists. Furthermore, given that this is manifesting for all the
links in that properties file, it looks a very generic issue and not
just to this specific "link1" symlink.
To make it much more weird, if I run this exact same state of "master"
branch, by jus
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/52
Have updated the PR to fix the test case so that it runs the correct
command on Windows, during the tests.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e
GitHub user jaikiran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/52
[master] Fix BZ-58451 BZ-58833
The commit here fixes the issues reported in:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58833
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58451
Thank you. I'm moving ahead with the new proposed task. Hopefully I
should be able to have something functional in a few days.
-Jaikiran
On 14/12/17 5:14 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-12-14, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
With that context, I would like to explain what I have attempted so
far
by changing the internal
implementation detail of this task (and maybe removing support for
certain attributes).
Either way, I would still like to hear others thoughts on this.
-Jaikiran
On 14/12/17 3:39 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I've started some experiments in adding support for the recently
[1] http://junit.org/junit5/
[2] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61796
[3]
https://github.com/jaikiran/ant/commit/42c7f221a8cd0848df0a2d6cac2897c07d446bda
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...
It's back to normal [1], so the crash seems to be specific to certain
nodes on Jenkins, for Java 6. I don't plan to look more into this.
[1]
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Matrix-1.9.x-Linux/jdk=JDK%201.6%20(latest)/135/
-Jaikiran
On 13/12/17 8:40 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
So we
On 12/12/17 8:05 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
The next few days, I'll probably try and see if I can get a Linux
based job to run alongside this Windows job for PRs.
We now have a Linux one too for the PRs
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant%20Github-PR-Linux/. It has the same
characteristics
most likely _not_ a coincidence. But given this a JVM
crash (in Java 6), it most likely is a JVM issue. I'll see if I can find
something on this, before we decide if at all we need to rollback that
commit.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/0fd2a86369aab41db316b1064a559bae08afae0f
-Jaikiran
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/51
Thanks for reviewing. Merged to master branch. Will backport it to 1.9.x
too.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/51
>> an alternative would be to only wrap the stream inside of zipFile if
mark wasn't supported.
@bodewig, I actually liked your idea. So I did an additional change in this
commit (PR ha
Do let me know if there's anything I can do to help investigate this.
I'm curious myself to see what's causing this.
-Jaikiran
On 13/12/17 2:56 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-12-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-12-12, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
So the one final test that's still failing
My experiments have completed [1] and any new mails from github/jenkins
jobs are genuine mails. Hopefully, the next time I try something around
this, it won't take these many spurious mails.
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ant.apache.org/msg46284.html
-Jaikiran
On 12/12/17 7:05 PM
/
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Github user jaikiran closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/38
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Github user jaikiran closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/51
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
GitHub user jaikiran reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/51
[master] Changes for BZ-19516
As suggested in https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19516, the
change in this PR uses `java.io.BufferedInputStream` which can take an
underlying
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/38
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/38
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/38
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Sorry about the continuous mails from github/ant repo. I'm (yet again)
trying to get the Jenkins job integrated with Ant github repo. I don't
have a way to disable these mails while I experiment with it to get it
right. Hopefully, it should be sorted out in the next hour or so.
-Jaikiran
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/51
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/51
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/38
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/38
this is ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/38
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user jaikiran closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/51
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
GitHub user jaikiran reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/51
[master] Changes for BZ-19516
As suggested in https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19516, the
change in this PR uses `java.io.BufferedInputStream` which can take an
underlying
GitHub user jaikiran reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/38
Do not merge
Testing Jenkins integration. Do not merge this PR
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jaikiran/ant dummy
Alternatively
GitHub user jaikiran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/51
[master] Changes for BZ-19516
As suggested in https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19516, the
change in this PR uses `java.io.BufferedInputStream` which can take an
underlying `InputStream
/org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.unix/SymlinkTest/testRecreate/
-Jaikiran
On 10/12/17 3:13 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-12-10, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
testCreateDoubleHanging is related to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 judging from the
history. Here the link points to a non-existent file
.
Done. The documentation of symlink task is now updated
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/485b92fe7494c5473e019329cbf7a33e556acad6
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e
of changes, I am willing
to undo them and go back to the original state that was before I started
these changes.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/b3c7d5dc451960986a94d24785a2c1d24b0b0d6a
-Jaikiran
On 10/12/17 5:15 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
[@Steve I'm trying to drag you
On 10/12/17 3:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-12-10, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I'll investigate why this is failing (local tests pass for me) and fix it.
Target testCreateOverFile in the antunit test explicitly tries to
replace a file with a link, doing exactly what the bugzilla report says
401 - 500 of 709 matches
Mail list logo
