Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2023-02-08 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 2:37 PM Ivan Zhakov wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 at 21:06, Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> >> On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 21:37, Ivan Zhakov wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 11:57, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >>> > >>> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 3:58 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote: >>> > >

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2023-02-06 Thread Ivan Zhakov via dev
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 at 21:06, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 21:37, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > >> On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 11:57, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 3:58 PM Johan Corveleyn >> wrote: >> > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:59 AM Mariusz W wrote: >> >

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2022-06-16 Thread Ivan Zhakov via dev
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 21:37, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 11:57, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 3:58 PM Johan Corveleyn > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:59 AM Mariusz W wrote: > > > > On 2021/01/26 14:54:04, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > > >

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2022-01-05 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 11:57, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 3:58 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:59 AM Mariusz W wrote: > > > On 2021/01/26 14:54:04, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 10:25 AM Johan Corveleyn > > > >

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2021-09-13 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 3:58 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:59 AM Mariusz W wrote: > > On 2021/01/26 14:54:04, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 10:25 AM Johan Corveleyn > > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 8:17 PM William A Rowe Jr > > > >

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2021-09-07 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:59 AM Mariusz W wrote: > On 2021/01/26 14:54:04, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 10:25 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 8:17 PM William A Rowe Jr > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Sorry, I'd been pounding on a beta deliverable,

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2021-02-23 Thread Mariusz W
On 2021/01/26 14:54:04, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 10:25 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 8:17 PM William A Rowe Jr > > wrote: > > > > > > Sorry, I'd been pounding on a beta deliverable, it's my bad. This coming > > > week I have cycles to give >

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2021-01-26 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 10:25 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 8:17 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > > > Sorry, I'd been pounding on a beta deliverable, it's my bad. This coming > > week I have cycles to give > > back to APR, CMake and other projects neglected during this

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-12-24 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 8:17 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Sorry, I'd been pounding on a beta deliverable, it's my bad. This coming week > I have cycles to give > back to APR, CMake and other projects neglected during this crunch period. I > hope an end-of-year > (or very early January)

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-12-23 Thread William A Rowe Jr
Sorry, I'd been pounding on a beta deliverable, it's my bad. This coming week I have cycles to give back to APR, CMake and other projects neglected during this crunch period. I hope an end-of-year (or very early January) release will meet your goals.. On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 6:32 AM Johan

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-12-11 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:30 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 2:26 AM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 3:35 PM Nick Kew wrote: > >> > >> > >> > On 24 Nov 2020, at 18:51, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > >> > > >> > Yes, I'm on it. 1.6.x and prior

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-11-27 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 2:26 AM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 3:35 PM Nick Kew wrote: >> >> >> > On 24 Nov 2020, at 18:51, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> > >> > Yes, I'm on it. 1.6.x and prior somewhat works. 1.7.0 does not, asking >> > for apr_stat of a root drive. Seeing

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-11-26 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 3:35 PM Nick Kew wrote: > > > On 24 Nov 2020, at 18:51, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > > > Yes, I'm on it. 1.6.x and prior somewhat works. 1.7.0 does not, asking > > for apr_stat of a root drive. Seeing the request yesterday for a new > release, > > I'd like the chance to

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-11-26 Thread Nick Kew
> On 24 Nov 2020, at 18:51, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Yes, I'm on it. 1.6.x and prior somewhat works. 1.7.0 does not, asking > for apr_stat of a root drive. Seeing the request yesterday for a new release, > I'd like the chance to fix that quirk of the Win32 API and populate the stat >

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-11-24 Thread William A Rowe Jr
Yes, I'm on it. 1.6.x and prior somewhat works. 1.7.0 does not, asking for apr_stat of a root drive. Seeing the request yesterday for a new release, I'd like the chance to fix that quirk of the Win32 API and populate the stat struct with something resembling correct info about the root mounts.

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-11-24 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 3:13 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 12:22 AM William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > > > > This information is basically all we needed to resolve. The additional call > > to obtain more fileinfo cannot resolve a root dir. It could, if we > > transform the >

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-06-12 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 12:22 AM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > This information is basically all we needed to resolve. The additional call > to obtain more fileinfo cannot resolve a root dir. It could, if we transform > the > path \\?\c:\ to \\.\c: (the device c). Looking at this further tomorrow

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-05-16 Thread William A Rowe Jr
This information is basically all we needed to resolve. The additional call to obtain more fileinfo cannot resolve a root dir. It could, if we transform the path \\?\c:\ to \\.\c: (the device c). Looking at this further tomorrow after some family hangout time tonight. Thanks for this level of

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-05-15 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 7:41 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > Op vr 8 mei 2020 16:25 schreef William A Rowe Jr : >> >> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 4:50 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 1:59 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: >>> > >>> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 4:48 PM Johan Corveleyn

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-05-08 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Op vr 8 mei 2020 16:25 schreef William A Rowe Jr : > On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 4:50 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 1:59 AM Johan Corveleyn >> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 4:48 PM Johan Corveleyn >> wrote: >> > > >> > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 3:51 PM William A

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-05-08 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 4:50 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 1:59 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 4:48 PM Johan Corveleyn > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 3:51 PM William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > > > > > > > > Interesting. > > > > > > > >

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-05-08 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 1:59 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 4:48 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 3:51 PM William A Rowe Jr > > wrote: > > > > > > Interesting. > > > > > > Not being familiar with the subversion code, it would be helpful to see >

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-04-23 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 4:48 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 3:51 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > > > Interesting. > > > > Not being familiar with the subversion code, it would be helpful to see > > what args > > are being passed to the offending (offended) apr_stat call,

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-04-15 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 3:51 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Interesting. > > Not being familiar with the subversion code, it would be helpful to see what > args > are being passed to the offending (offended) apr_stat call, so we can > investigate > the behavior of APR 1.7.0 (or trunk) further.

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-04-15 Thread William A Rowe Jr
Interesting. Not being familiar with the subversion code, it would be helpful to see what args are being passed to the offending (offended) apr_stat call, so we can investigate the behavior of APR 1.7.0 (or trunk) further. I had to tweak the logic of the test I presented above to ask a

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-04-15 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 4:19 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 3:45 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:48 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:31 PM William A Rowe Jr > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > That's very likely, and this can be

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-04-10 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 3:45 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:48 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:31 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> > >> > That's very likely, and this can be researched further to dig up exactly >> > how >> > subst is handled. (As you

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-04-10 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:48 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:31 PM William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > > > > That's very likely, and this can be researched further to dig up exactly > how > > subst is handled. (As you mention, it hasn't been common since the > introduction > > of

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-04-09 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:31 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 8:01 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 1:20 PM Nick Kew wrote: >> > > >> > > The below report about a problem with Subversion working on 'subst'ed >> > > drives (Windows), seemed to be

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-04-09 Thread William A Rowe Jr
I'm pursuing something like the attached patch. Only one test fails, which I presume devolves back to the /. root comparison (so the data directory comparison is good.) The stat/getfileinfo comparison doesn't alert if the info can't be retrieved from one or the other call, which isn't good (the

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-04-09 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 8:01 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 1:20 PM Nick Kew wrote: > > > > > > The below report about a problem with Subversion working on 'subst'ed > > > drives (Windows), seemed to be related to a change in APR 1.7.0 > > > (https://svn.apache.org/r1855950),

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-04-09 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 1:20 PM Nick Kew wrote: > > On 9 Apr 2020, at 11:07, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > > > [ cc -= dev@subversion.a.o ] > > > > Hi APR devs, > > > > The below report about a problem with Subversion working on 'subst'ed > > drives (Windows), seemed to be related to a change in APR

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-04-09 Thread Nick Kew
> On 9 Apr 2020, at 12:19, Nick Kew wrote: > > >> On 9 Apr 2020, at 11:07, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> >> [ cc -= dev@subversion.a.o ] >> >> Hi APR devs, >> >> The below report about a problem with Subversion working on 'subst'ed >> drives (Windows), seemed to be related to a change in APR

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-04-09 Thread Nick Kew
> On 9 Apr 2020, at 11:07, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > [ cc -= dev@subversion.a.o ] > > Hi APR devs, > > The below report about a problem with Subversion working on 'subst'ed > drives (Windows), seemed to be related to a change in APR 1.7.0 > (https://svn.apache.org/r1855950), That fixed a

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-04-09 Thread Johan Corveleyn
nterface\WinFarmNet\WinFarmNet\Debug > X Applications\GUI > X Applications\PluginInstaller\SimLauncherLib > > Svn info seems to be the same, but svn status indicate that in the root they > are different: > > R:\>svn status > !M . > > And > > C

Re: Subversion reports status fault on substituted drive

2020-01-02 Thread Julian Foad
Mikael Rahbek wrote: As part of our development we use a substituted drive (Windows 10): E.g.: subst r: C:\Data\Production_work_7_1_Clean In the root of r: there is now always shown a change with status missing If checking from C:\Data\Production_work_7_1_Clean it shows the status correct.