On Thursday 03 October 2013 08:44 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:31:50AM +, Anshul Gangwar wrote:
Description
---
added the connection and socket timeout parameters for SMTP and sending
message in new thread so that HA doesn't get blocked beacause of hang in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14451/#review26660
---
utils/src/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java
Hi Nitin,
I was trying on running vm only, but I was
using changeServiceForVirtualMachine API instead of scaleVirtualMachine API.
But I wonder why changeServiceForVirtualMachine API succeeded in allocating
more than host capacity.
What is the basic difference between these two operations?
Hi Marcus and Kirk,
Good day to you, and thank you for your email replies.
We are using Ceph RBD primary storage. I can't find any error information
on agent.log, and I have set the logging to verbose (DEBUG) for all.
Since I am using RBD, am I still able to run the qemu-img info command?
I
Can we discuss the folowing:
Some type of device, the flutch is widely used and cloudstack supports
brands a and b. Now brand c comes to the market with feature X. It grows
it's market share slowly becouse of this feature and we, or better the
producer implement
a plugin using the new
Maurice,
Do you mean a clean install or an update?
In the latter case this would be the responsibility of the cloud operator.
In the first case, probably an oversight on the side of the community.
regards,
Daan
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Maurice Lawler maurice.law...@me.comwrote:
Hello,
Issue resolved for me.
In my case, my dashboard said me, i have 0kb of storage on my secondary
storage.
The reason was not due to the cs 4.2, but it was entirely my fault due to a
misconfiguration :
My ssvm was correctly deploying, but it can't communicate with my nfs
server.
The
Yes Chip, i can just download the rpms from the cloudstack repo.
However, in the past i always compiled myself my cs rpms, so i would
continue on this way.
But the cloudstack already-build rpms can be sufficient for my needs
Wei, in my link http://pastebin.com/TNegzXUX
I saw i had a building
Hey Rayees,
It's fixed.
You can find the 4.2 nonoss packages here if you want
http://nvpmadm1.nvp.strocamp.net:8080/job/cloudstack-branch-4_2-package-rpm-nonoss/
Cheers,
Hugo
From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com]
Sent: vrijdag 4 oktober 2013 7:30
To: Hugo
Hi,
I am planning to write script utility to monitor processes and restart on
the event of failure. It will also logs the events.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 02-Oct-2013, at 3:25 AM, Simon Weller swel...@ena.com wrote:
supervisord maybe?
- Original Message -
From: Chiradeep Vittal
Please provide me edit permissions, username: saksham
Regards,
Saksham
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 10:46 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wiki access
Mike, Tuna, Srinivas, Go, done.
On
Could we not use the native syslog to gather the info (process monitoring
will still be needed) and present an admin interface on this on the ms?
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I am planning to write script utility to monitor
this is not a counter proposal to your initiative, Jayapal. It sounds great.
I just want to give cloud operators and domain admins more control on how
to react on mishaps on the systemvms.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
Could we not use the native
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Saksham Srivastava
saksham.srivast...@citrix.com wrote:
saksham
you're in
Thanks Daan.
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:52 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Wiki access
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Saksham Srivastava
saksham.srivast...@citrix.com wrote:
saksham
you're in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14489/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Sateesh Chodapuneedi.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14489/
---
(Updated Oct. 4, 2013, 9:43 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep
need edit permissions , username: anshulg
Regards,
Anshul
On Friday 04 October 2013 02:47 PM, Saksham Srivastava wrote:
Please provide me edit permissions, username: saksham
Regards,
Saksham
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14335/#review2
---
Checking LB rules deletion after network gc looks good to me.
anshulg is in
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Anshul Gangwar
anshul.gang...@citrix.comwrote:
need edit permissions , username: anshulg
Regards,
Anshul
On Friday 04 October 2013 02:47 PM, Saksham Srivastava wrote:
Please provide me edit permissions, username: saksham
Regards,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14248/#review26667
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me.
- sanjeev n
On Oct. 3, 2013, 7:28
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14489/#review26668
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me.
- Rajesh Battala
On Oct. 4, 2013,
Please provide me edit permissions, username : abhinavr
Thanks and regards,
Abhinav
-Original Message-
From: Saksham Srivastava [mailto:saksham.srivast...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:47 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Wiki access
Please provide me edit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14489/
---
(Updated Oct. 4, 2013, 10:17 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep
Hi Mike,
Where do you see this information ? On the CS dashboard ? Or with
xencenter, listing the sr with the windows gui ?
Regards, Benoit.
2013/10/3 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
Hi,
On one of my SRs, I see the following information:
100.2 GB used of 200 GB total (100 GB
This would be very great !!
2013/10/3 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
go go go
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:07 PM, David Ortiz dpor...@outlook.com wrote:
This sounds like a great idea.
From: chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]
Does anybody have a link to a howto that is useful for building the docs on
a mac (osx 10.6)?
thanks,
Daan
guess 10.6 is lion so
http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/en-US/Publican/3.2/html/Users_Guide/chap-Users_Guide-Installing_Publican.html#sect-Users_Guide-Installing_Publican-Installing_Publican_on_OSX_Lion
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
Does anybody have
On Oct 4, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anybody have a link to a howto that is useful for building the docs on
a mac (osx 10.6)?
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.1/html/Developers_Guide/installing-publican.html
installing
On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:43 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
utils/src/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java, line 149
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14451/diff/1/?file=360597#file360597line149
I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4807.
You could assign the bug to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14451/
---
(Updated Oct. 4, 2013, 11:12 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Bugs:
Hey Darren, the build appears to be broken on spring-modularization.
Actually a test is broken. If fixed I could generate some packages for
testing.
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-yumrepo-refresh/3028/console
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 10:27:55AM +0530, Prasanna
thank you for your answer,
I tried ssvm health check script, everything looks nice - no error or
warning, all works correct.
This generally should happen because of management server not able to
communicate with the SSVM agent.
Could you run the ssvm health check script to see if the
There are around ~110 Automation tickets open. Most of them are major, can
automation guys go thru the tickets and start picking them.
Following Jira query will give the tickets that are open.
project = CLOUDSTACK AND resolution = Unresolved AND fixVersion in (4.2.0,
4.2.1) AND text ~
works slow but like a charme. no tinkering needed for creating the devguide
in pdf format. I am about to try the rest in pdf+html
thanks Sebastien
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:58 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 4, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
There are around ~47 Documentation tickets open. Most of them are major, can
documentation guys go thru the tickets and start picking them.
Following Jira query will give the tickets that are open.
project = CLOUDSTACK AND resolution = Unresolved AND fixVersion in (4.2.0,
4.2.1) AND text ~
On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:43 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
utils/test/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtilsTest.java, line 225
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14451/diff/1/?file=360598#file360598line225
What I am suggesting is that add a method something like
boolean isEqual(var1, var2) {
There are around ~72 UI tickets open. Most of them are major, can documentation
guys go thru the tickets and start picking them.
Following Jira query will give the tickets that are open.
project = CLOUDSTACK AND resolution = Unresolved AND fixVersion in (4.2.0,
4.2.1) AND text ~ “UI
-abhi
I'll summarize and address the concerns raised so far.
Marvin has been in this repo for a long time for us to start writing
tests. The only tests I've seen coming are from a specific set of
people focussed on QA efforts. I want to reduce the impediment for
people who are writing tests *today*.
H,
Is there a reason the split of docs repo does not have anything in master
but only in 4.2? Should I cherrypick the entire tree or do we want to wait
with that for some reason?
Daan
hi guys ,
finally i was able to add the instance,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templates%2C+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
the above like helped to find the problem.
i ssh'd into SSVM using sh -i /root/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud -p 3922
root@LinkLocaip
ran the script
Prasanna,
I share Chips concern. But let me start by saying that given the effort
Citrix puts in the integration testing, making it easy for your guys should
be somewhat a priority. However, can we do the separation is such a way
that integration tests as part of plugin and other enhancements is
Hello Prasanna,
After sending this out yesterday I realized it would probably get stripped so
Chip recommended opening issues in Jira and attaching the patches there.
I've created two issues and attached patches as well as attaching a patch to
another issue that came in about the docs:
*
Yes, specially the one in CC.
On 04/10/13 6:16 pm, Sudha Ponnaganti sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com
wrote:
Do you mean UI guys??
-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 4:54 AM
To: CloudStack Dev
Cc: Brian Federle;
H,
I started building the docs of the 4.2 tree, using the cfg publican-all.cfg
I fails. Is there a defined set of targets that must/should build in the
docs?
Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/zone-add.xml -
tmp/en-US/xml/zone-add.xml
Beginning work on en-US
Validation failed:
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Anshul Gangwar anshul.gang...@citrix.comwrote:
On Thursday 03 October 2013 08:44 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:31:50AM +, Anshul Gangwar wrote:
Description
---
added the connection and socket timeout parameters for SMTP and
On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:43 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
utils/test/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtilsTest.java, line 225
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14451/diff/1/?file=360598#file360598line225
What I am suggesting is that add a method something like
boolean isEqual(var1, var2) {
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H,
I started building the docs of the 4.2 tree, using the cfg publican-all.cfg
I fails. Is there a defined set of targets that must/should build in the
docs?
I personally don't like the -all target. I generally
Bah - I hit send without dealing with the second question.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H,
I started building the docs of the 4.2 tree, using the cfg publican-all.cfg
I fails. Is there a defined set of targets that must/should build in the
Doh! I guess that would have been helpful info. :)
It is in XenCenter. If you click on an SR and look at the General tab.
http://i.imgur.com/z5F1Ct0.png
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:34 AM, benoit lair kurushi4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
Where do you see this information ? On the CS dashboard
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H,
Is there a reason the split of docs repo does not have anything in master
but only in 4.2? Should I cherrypick the entire tree or do we want to wait
with that for some reason?
There are two reasons that it's
And i will hold my peace thee rest of the week.
mobile biligual spell checker used
Op 4 okt. 2013 16:28 schreef David Nalley da...@gnsa.us:
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
H,
Is there a reason the split of docs repo does not have anything in
4.2 in the new repo, yes. It doesn't fail. I happend to notice the severe
message as it ran by
mobile biligual spell checker used
Op 4 okt. 2013 16:22 schreef David Nalley da...@gnsa.us:
Bah - I hit send without dealing with the second question.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Daan Hoogland
Effectively, it's very surprising.
I checked my differents storage (local as iscsi sr) on xcp 1.0, xcp 1.1,
xcp 1.4.90, xcp 1.6, xenserver 6.0 and xenserver 6.2, i observe that i can
have a 'used' storage more important that the 'allocated' one
I verified connected to my hypervisors shells and
I just cherry picked that commit, so it should be fixed now.
Darren
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes unfortunately when I did the rebase and pushed the branch, master
was broken. So that failing test is not related to Spring and was
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-180 for this.
Darren
Abhi
It is best to set up a shared filter. You will need to open a INFRA ticket like
this one https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/INFRA-6145 to get relevant
permissions for the JIRA
Thanks
Animesh
-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek
As per thread below with Animesh, we would like to resurrect the issue.
As per my conversation with Chip, the issue for not letting component
maintainers - get assignments by default - was because we wanted to maintain a
balance of getting things done vs letting community grow
Question to JIRA
That¹s great Benoit. You could have also found this out running the ssvm
health check script.
Thumb rule - In case of ssvm/secondary storage related issues first
troubleshooting step is to run ssvm health check script
On 04/10/13 1:37 AM, benoit lair kurushi4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Issue
What is your storage over provisioning factor ? Even that could be the
reason.
Regarding allocated vs used capacity I had written a wiki[1] sometime
back. Please see if it helps.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Understanding+Dashbo
ard
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 04/10/13
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13938/#review26676
---
utils/src/com/cloud/utils/StringUtils.java
Unfortunately, that is out of scope for our plans right now. If anyone knows
who originally asked for this functionality or who is still using it, we would
be interested in having discussions around the use cases these APIs are
addressing and then looking into bringing that functionality into
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:11:32PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
Question to JIRA experienced admins, we can preserve assign to me option,
and if unassigned goto component maintainer?
Absolutely. Initial assignment does not equal the actual assignee.
Component-based assignment is just a way to
*JoinVOs are used to store entries from MySQL views, which are not editable. I
think removing setters from the *JoinVOs may help avoid some potential
confusion as setters seem to imply that the fields are editable, which they
really aren't.
I started looking around and it looks like most
-Original Message-
From: SuichII, Christopher [mailto:chris.su...@netapp.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 9:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring
Sure - I could see that working. Anyone have thoughts whether an enum
could be used
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:11:32PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
Question to JIRA experienced admins, we can preserve assign to me
option, and if unassigned goto component maintainer?
Absolutely. Initial assignment does not equal the actual assignee.
Component-based assignment is just a way
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 10:28 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:11:32PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
Question
Hi guys,
Not arguing against it, but I would be very much interested in your reasoning
behind why having docs in a separate repo makes them easier to work on. What
have we experienced since this time last year which has led us to reverse the
original decision to keep docs in the same repo with
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:40:06PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
[Animesh] Chip does that mean you are open to folks assigning tickets to
others? Should this be posted in the original thread
http://markmail.org/thread/btovj6t6opqxge5q. because the threads where Ilya
reopened the
Maybe this is a silly question, but if CS handles Live Migrations, are we
still constrained to migrating VMs from one host to another in the same
cluster?
Same question for HA.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Clayton Weise cwe...@keyinfo.com wrote:
AFAIK, no, but it's a great RFE that I would
FYI - We have received the SGA for this plugin, and the 72 hours of lazy
consensus over at general@incubator.a.o has started.
I'll update this thread when we have cleared that hurdle, allowing us to
accept the patch into the repo.
-chip
- Forwarded message from Chip Childers
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 10:45 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:40:06PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:43:16PM +, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
Hi guys,
Not arguing against it, but I would be very much interested in your reasoning
behind why having docs in a separate repo makes them easier to work on. What
have we experienced since this time last year which has led us
Was that a limitation caused by the primary storage only being available to a
single cluster and not zone wide like 4.2.0 provides?
Travis
On Oct 4, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Maybe this is a silly question, but if CS handles Live Migrations, are we
Not Sure, if it falls under similar lines\requires a separate thread. I am
trying to see if there is a way we can add a component field, primary owner
fields for component available to be assigned for a given review under
Http://reviews.apache.org.
This way i will select component as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12134/#review26678
---
Ship it!
master: bd8536739c012e1025d35271ce82dbc9e5e66a8d
-
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:55:58PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
[Animesh] Chip I get the principle behind the reasoning in thread[2] which
should be maintained but at the same time not being able to assign the issues
is a big hindrance in running a release. I am not sure if you saw my
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13939/#review26682
---
I believe this is being blocked by 13938, can you please update to
From the perspective of a new community member being able to contribute to a
separate repo that doesn't touch the app code is nice because that would open
up the possibility of being a committer for the doc repo and separate that silo
of work. Also less volatile in the fact that people, like
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14290/#review26687
---
I'm fine with dropping the methods that are not needed, but I don't
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14405/#review26688
---
Ship it!
master: 826c69fd29bb98d3f631596f72a6eb3525d83aa2
-
Yeah, that's kind of what I was interested in learning about.
Now that we have zone-wide primary storage, does that mean CS is able to
issue the live migration of a VM from one cluster to another (or are we
still confined to clusters)?
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Travis Graham
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/#review26690
---
I would prefer not to do this. From a technical perspective the
Darren,
I think one of the benefits of allowing the priority to be specified in the xml
is that it can be configured after deployment. If for some reason two
strategies or providers conflict, then their priorities can be changed in XML
to resolve the conflict. I believe the Spring @Order
On 10/04/2013 10:36 AM, Edison Su wrote:
How to use the way spring 4.0 did:
https://jira.springsource.org/browse/SPR-5574?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16967971/spring-ordered-list-of-beans
Add order in bean.
That is a spring specific API/interface. In general we should never
using
Response in line:
-Original Message-
From: Santhosh Edukulla [mailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment
Not Sure, if it falls under similar lines\requires a
On 10/04/2013 11:58 AM, SuichII, Christopher wrote:
Darren,
I think one of the benefits of allowing the priority to be specified in the xml
is that it can be configured after deployment. If for some reason two
strategies or providers conflict, then their priorities can be changed in XML
to
On 10/4/13 10:37 AM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:11:32PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
Question to JIRA experienced admins, we can preserve assign to me
option, and if unassigned goto component maintainer?
Absolutely. Initial assignment does not equal
We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and destroy.
For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA ticket (rest
call) to track the decomision process.
When VM is deployed, we may need to do something else, but also rest based?
I can see 2 ways of
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and
destroy.
For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA ticket (rest
call) to track the decomision process.
When VM is deployed, we may
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14289/#review26691
---
Ship it!
master: c9f41d40465e3cc8bd775dcfdeb3fa1907fd1e7f
-
Hi Prasanna,
Thank you for let me know.
I'll resubmit the patch, but I cannot find the repository
cloudstack-docs.git in the ReviewBoard.
Do you know how to send the patch to the repository?
Regards,
Yoshikazu
2013/10/3 Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org:
Hi,
The docs were broken out into a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14477/#review26693
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Oct. 4, 2013, 12:57 a.m.,
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and
destroy.
For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA ticket
(rest call) to track the decomision process.
When VM is deployed, we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/
---
(Updated Oct. 4, 2013, 8:19 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy
and
destroy.
For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA
ticket
(rest call) to track the decomision process.
When VM is
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and
destroy.
For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA
On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:52 p.m., Darren Shepherd wrote:
I would prefer not to do this. From a technical perspective the code uses
getRealPath and Files which are not compatible across all serlvet
containers and this implementation forces a lot of file system stat()
calls, but that isn't
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14477/#review26694
---
Some questions and comments that probably need to be answered
I some outstanding questions I just posted to the review.
Any thoughts on those questions?
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14477/
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:07 PM, edi...@apache.org wrote:
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master c9f41d404 - 180cfa19e
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
