RM after 4.9

Hello All, As you all know, I am the RM for the 4.9 release. Unfortunately, this is not a position I will be able to maintain for the long term, so we should start this discussion sooner rather than later. I am actively working to simplify the RM role by working towards the following goals: -

ACS PRs Status - 2016/05/02

ACS PRs - 1433 - master (ready) - 1230 - master (ready) - 1350 - master (ready) - 1463 - master (ready) - 1502 - master (ready, pending comments) - 1054 - master (ready, do grep) - 1515 (1375) - 4.8 (ready, pending new 4.7 PR) - 1477 - 4.7 (ready, pending verification)

CCCNA in Montreal - Price increase at 4PM EST

Hey Everyone, Just wanted to give you all a heads up. The early bird pricing of $150 + tax will be increasing to $250 + tax today at 4PM EST. Get your tickets today to save some money... CCCNA Website: http://ca.cloudstackcollab.org/ Registration Link:

Re: [DISCUSS] Pull Requests Triage sprint

Thanks Rohit. This is very helpful. :) *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > great w

Re: Python Question (with regards to Marvin)

ed in might be broken if I don't keep the class method. > ________ > From: Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com> > Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 12:03 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Python Question (with regards to Marvin) >

Re: Python Question (with regards to Marvin)

> > There exists the same problem for at least one other pair of methods. > > Since the class method is listed second in the file currently, it is the > only one of the two that can be utilized. That being the case, we might > just want to keep the class method and remove the instance m

Re: Python Question (with regards to Marvin)

as listed after the instance method for that test, so I wasn't > surprised that the class method did, in fact, get executed there). > > What I did not try was to list the class method first, then list the > instance method, and then try to invoke the class method. > > As mentioned in m

Re: Python Question (with regards to Marvin)

n(self): > 7 print 'instance hi' > 8 > 9 test = Test() > 10 > 11 test.run() > > As I suspected, I think this means we have a problem in base.py. > > From: Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com> > Sent: Saturday

Re: Python Question (with regards to Marvin)

Python, but can you overload it? > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10202938/how-do-i-use-method-overloading-in-python > > > On Apr 30, 2016, at 6:23 AM, Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Here is a pretty good explanation. > > > &

Re: Python Question (with regards to Marvin)

You are probably getting this error because you are trying to call: Host.enableMaintenance(client) Check my examples above for how to call it. Sorry I am on my phone, so I am not very efficient with my phone and cant civet you better details. :) On Apr 30, 2016 8:23 AM, "Will St

Re: Python Question (with regards to Marvin)

Here is a pretty good explanation. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/136097/what-is-the-difference-between-staticmethod-and-classmethod-in-python I am guessing that both exist because the function is called both with a host instance and with the class itself. Class instance example:

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-jdk18 #509

Some of the tests that were added can take some time, so is it possible to bump the timeout value on Jenkins? If we were close before, we are going to be over now. *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com

Re: [LOGISTICS] Move 'apache/cloudstack' to 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

org > wrote: > Hi Will, > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > ...I have CC'ed in both the ACS dev@ list and the ASF board@ list to > try to > > keep everyone on the same page... > > Thanks - with my board me

Re: Incorrect system vm templates for master build.

4.9 will require a new system vm template when we add the strongswan support and ospf, but I don't think I have added anything yet which will require a new system vm (yet). Rohit started a dev@ thread about a week or so ago on this topic for us. On Apr 28, 2016 7:38 AM, "Rajani Karuturi"

Re: Jenkins issue

I didn't think was supported yet... *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Nathan Johnson <njohn...@ena.com> wrote: > I am aware that there

Jenkins

Seeing a few jobs with this result recently. [cloudstack-pr-analysis] $ /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/tools/hudson.tasks.Maven_MavenInstallation/maven-3.3.3/bin/mvn clean --projects=org.apache.cloudstack:cloudstack org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.10:check[ERROR] Error executing Maven.[ERROR] 1

[LOGISTICS] Move 'apache/cloudstack' to 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

This thread is primarily to work out the logistical details with the ASF Infra team for making this move. I thought I had members of the ASF Infra team CC'ed earlier, but that was not the case, so I appologize if this was not on your radar until now. I have CC'ed in both the ACS dev@ list and

Re: Another question about Marvin

Perfect. That is what I was looking for. Thanks... :) *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Prashanth Manthena < prashanth.ma

Another question about Marvin

So I see a few different ways in which tests are defined. For example, here are a few different attribute configurations: a) @attr(tags=["advanced", "intervlan"]) b) @attr(tags=["advanced", "intervlan"], required_hardware="true") c) @attr(tags=["advanced", "intervlan"],

Re: Failed to create VPC: Unable to start VPC VR (VM DomainRouter) due to error in finalizeStart, not retrying

It looks like your host(9) is unreachable. Can you verify that the connectivity is all setup correctly? *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:31 AM

RE: No module named marvin

o do something like, pip > install --upgrade --egg > > Regards. > > Regards, > > Rohit Yadav > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > -Original Message- > From: Will St

RE: No module named marvin

t; 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > -Original Message- > From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 11:37 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: No module named marvin > > Could this: > >

ACS PRs Status - 2016/04/25

ACS PRs - 826 - master (ready, pending comments) - 1515 (1375) - 4.8 (ready, pending squash) - 1376 - master (ready, pending 1515 + rebase) - 1374 - master (ready, pending 1515 + 1376 + rebase) - 1054 - master (grep, pending CI) - 1464 - master (pending LGTM) - 1436 - master

No module named marvin

Could this: Deploy data center.. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/data/git/cs3/cloudstack/tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py", line 28, in from marvin import configGenerator ImportError: No module named marvin Be caused by this: Installing Marvin DEPRECATION:

Re: Jenkins broken?

> > > > > > > On 4/25/16, 8:54 AM, "Will Stevens" <williamstev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Jenkins has been acting up a bit recently. Try doing a force push of your > >PR to kick off the run again to see if it still fails. > >On Apr 25, 2016

Re: Jenkins broken?

Jenkins has been acting up a bit recently. Try doing a force push of your PR to kick off the run again to see if it still fails. On Apr 25, 2016 9:14 AM, "David Mabry" wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Can someone check on Jenkins? It looks like it not able to check out 4.7 > branch

Re: Multithreaded Builds

To: dev > Subject: Re: Multithreaded Builds > > No Will, it was to prove you need extra hardware! > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Haha. Awesome. :) > > > > This was more to validate that it was OK that I con

Re: Multithreaded Builds

, then I will make it available to everyone. One step at a time. Making progress. :) On Apr 23, 2016 10:02 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > No Will, it was to prove you need extra hardware! > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Will Stevens <willi

Re: Multithreaded Builds

Haha. Awesome. :) This was more to validate that it was OK that I configure parallelism in my CI environment. On Apr 23, 2016 9:34 AM, "Ian Rae" <i...@cloudops.com> wrote: > Ok ok, point made, we can buy you new hardware Will ;) > > On Saturday, 23 April 2016,

RE: Here goes nothing... :)

apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Marvin+Test+Matrix > > > > > Kind regards, > > Paul Angus > > Regards, > > Paul Angus > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > >

RE: Multithreaded Builds

> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Multithreaded Builds > > > > > Op 22 apr. 2016 om 00:03 heeft Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com> > het volgende geschreven: > > > > Well the multithreaded build did complete successfully and it took. &

Here goes nothing... :)

​In an effort to figure out which tests are working and which are not and to start compiling a list of tests with issues I have written a small python script which auto discovers and categorizes the tests in the 'smoke' and 'component' directories. This will be interesting: # HARDWARE REQUIRED

Re: Multithreaded Builds

runs I will take any minutes I can shave. :) Cheers, Will On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is it a reasonable expectation for ACS to be able to be built using the > `-T 1C` flag? I am trying it now, but if it works once, it

Multithreaded Builds

Is it a reasonable expectation for ACS to be able to be built using the `-T 1C` flag? I am trying it now, but if it works once, it may not mean that it would always work. I see a lot of messages like this: [WARNING] * [WARNING] *

Re: jenkins builds are failing

Would that be related to the PR being tested? On Apr 21, 2016 7:17 AM, "Suresh Sadhu" wrote: > HI All, > > Jenkins build are failing with below licensing error "Too many files with > unapproved license: 1 " can someone please look into it. PR merge getting > delayed

Re: ACS Testing

tests, I would happily review it. :) *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think we wan

ACS Testing

This is going to be a stupid question, but I don't know the answer, so I would like some guidance on this. Under 'cloudstack/test/integration/' there are the following folders: - component - smoke - plugins - testpaths Looking specifically at 'components' and 'smoke', there seems to be a lot of

Re: [DISCUSS] Network offerings for Isolated Networks / VPCs

haha, i know you well enough daan to know how to read your emails. :P *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.

Re: [DISCUSS] Network offerings for Isolated Networks / VPCs

Ws: Inline On Apr 20, 2016 8:24 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'm not sure that is a good idea. There are a LOT of implications with this >

Re: [DISCUSS] Network offerings for Isolated Networks / VPCs

I'm not sure that is a good idea. There are a LOT of implications with this idea. For example, many hardware appliances can not handle overlapping ip space between networks. Because of this they can't be implemented in a vpc, only isolated guest networks. I know there are a lot more examples

Re: CloudStack Logging

Thanks Paul. Are you looking for only logs with errors or are you just looking for just any management server logs? *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11

Re: CloudStack Logging

for sure. I think knowing the answer to this will help people feel more comfortable uploading logs. Thanks for the valuable initiative... *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Tue

Re: [DISCUSS] ACS 4.9 systemvmtemplate

Thanks for starting this discussion Rohit. :) *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: &g

CloudStack Collab - Montreal - June 1-3

Hey All, The planning of the CCC event in Montreal is in full swing. A lot of people have submitted talks, so this is going to be an awesome event. We currently have a venue booked, but based on the number of talks submitted, this event may be bigger than we were initially expecting, so we may

Re: ACS PRs Status - 2016/04/18

we can start to distribute the CI load a little more, that should start to really get things moving. Gotta start somewhere. :) *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Mon, Apr 18

ACS PRs Status - 2016/04/18

ACS PRs - 1452 - master (ready, pending LGTM) - 1475 - 4.7 (pending clarification) - 1420 - master + svm (CI running) - 1365 - 4.7 (pending ALL) - 1402 - 4.7 (needs work) - 1454 - master (ready, pending LGTM) - 1459 - master (rerun CI) NOTE: This closes #561 - 1409 -

Re: [discuss] CloudStack logging

Do you have to recompile in order to turn off the logging for a specific package or class? If yes, that is a show stopper for almost everyone... If it only requires a management server restart, that is more realistic. *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue

Re: [discuss] CloudStack logging

Is there an easy way to do that Daan, or is it a tedious task you just have to power through? I agree this initiative would be helpful. On Apr 14, 2016 9:04 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > I largely agree with just one sneer to the operators amongst us: the level > can be

4.9 Release Schedule

Sorry this has taken me so long to publish. I was trying to make sure I had good momentum before I published a timeline so the timeline was realistic given our current pace. I know this release has taken quite a bit longer than usual. Sorry about that, I will be trying to get us back to a

Re: instances in test vpc without router

im not sure, i will let remi answer that. *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Re: ACS PRs Status - 2016/04/11

Yep, I got it. Thanks... :) 1487 (1449) - 4.7 (ready) NOTE: This closes #1449 *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:14 AM, martin kolly <martin

Re: Travis Failing

Hmmm. I am unable to reproduce this locally. I need to look deeper. Rohit, do you have any ideas on this? *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:13 PM

Re: Travis Failing

Could this be related to the following test errors? Tests run: 13, Failures: 0, Errors: 13, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.055 sec <<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.api.ApiServletTest *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|*

Re: Re. ACS PRs Status - 2016/04/11

Yep, no problem. Thanks for the heads up... *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Lv Haijiao <luhaij...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Will &g

Re: ACS PRs Status - 2016/04/11

from getting any new code merged, so this is something I will need to resolve. Thanks for reporting... :) *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:49 AM

ACS PRs Status - 2016/04/11

Here is this Monday's weekly status update. Jenkins and Travis were a bit flaky last week, so I will be keeping an eye on that and will be doing what I can to get those environment stabilized. Please note that I am trying to keep up on the statusus, but if I am wrong, I appologize... ACS PRs

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

" CLOUDSTACK-9203 Implement security group move on updateVM API call > #1297 > > " > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1297 > > > > -- > > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > > Nux! > > www.nux.ro &

Re: ACS PRs Status - 2016/04/08

I will get into the habit of posting these statuses on monday mornings so it better aligns with people's regular activities and does not get lost in the 'weekend emails'. :) Have a good weekend everyone... On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com>

ACS PRs Status - 2016/04/08

This is something I will likely start doing on a weekly basis. This is my current RM task list. As I merge in PRs they will be removed from this list, but these are the PRs I am actively working on. I have a thread open (PRs for 4.9 Release) for people to specify PRs they want to get on my

Re: [ACP Doctor] What is it?

Thanks Eran. Historically this tool was freely available at http://ccpdoctor.com/. I am guessing that is no longer the case? Thanks for maintaining this tool, I have used it quite a bit in the past and it is a valuable tool for troubleshooting... *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps

Re: [ACP Doctor] What is it?

Thanks Eran. Can you clarify if the tool will remain freely available? *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Eran Steiner <eran.stei...@accelerite.

Re: Travis Failing

> > For Cloudstack the account is setup (a hook was enabled in our github > mirror via infra), and every PR gets run through travis that way. > > Not sure about the the failure... > > -seb > > > On Apr 8, 2016, at 10:30 PM, Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com>

Travis Failing

I am not sure who has control of travis and how that works. I have not had a chance to get my head into that aspect yet. Can someone have a look at the following issue which seems to be happening to a bunch of travis builds right now. Requirement 'tools/marvin/dist/Marvin-*.tar.gz' looks like a

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

Thank you sir. I have added it to my queue. :) *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

Thanks for the items syed. I have added them to my active list. *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Syed Mushtaq <syed1.mush...@gmail.com>

Re: Introduction

While I know we all want these answers, I doubt the 'new guy' is going to be able to speak to that. :P Welcome. I look forward to working with you. On Apr 8, 2016 1:58 AM, "Erik Weber" wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Rashmi Dixit wrote:

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

of the issues. :) *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > For those interested: Fred and I have some ad

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-9341) Cannot upload volume when using Swift as secondary storage

PLD, do we have a github PR for this one already? I thought we had a fix for this locally. On Apr 7, 2016 2:45 PM, "Pierre-Luc Dion (JIRA)" wrote: > Pierre-Luc Dion created CLOUDSTACK-9341: > --- > > Summary: Cannot upload

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

/cloudops/upr *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote: > Will et al, > > These are currently the PRs we're

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

If you want me to verify things in your env, you can send me a tmate <https://tmate.io/> and I can have a look. *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

Yes, if the PR is ONLY a test and does not touch any other code then we can only run that test. I agree with you. If any code is changed outside the test, I always run the full suite. Make sense? *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

Yes, I agree we only need to run tests against the branch it was created on. It probably SHOULD be done against all branches it will be merged into, but we need to have things streamlined a bit more for that to be viable IMO. *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

I also had problems with 1459, but I was trying to run 4 CIs in the same bubble, so I thought it may have had something to do with that. I want to run it on its own so I don't have resource contention to make sure the tests are actually failing. *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

than having to work through it later. I am going to be doing a big push on getting testing cleaned up, so when I start going through all the tests and validating them, I want to reduce the amount of work I have to do, so validating the tests at source makes sense. :) *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

/' directory so changes to the 'run_marvin_router_tests.sh' file will be seen by both of my stacks. If you have any problems either Fred or I can get you sorted. Fred has been a superstar helping me get setup. :) *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal

Re: PRs for 4.9 Release

Thanks Rafael. I have 1/2 of those on my watch list, so I will review the ones I am not already actively working on. *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 12

PRs for 4.9 Release

I know this is not how this usually works, but I need to crowd source some info to be more effective. I am slowly getting things rolling for the 4.9 release. My CI is chugging away and I have a queue of PRs to get tested, so I will be getting through them as quickly as I can. I have finally

Re: http://cloudstackcollab.org/

Thanks Mike. @Paul, please use Mike's link and I will make sure that gets onto the website. :) *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Tutkowski, Mike

Re: http://cloudstackcollab.org/

email me your talk and I can get it to the correct people. *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> wrote: &g

Re: [ACP Doctor] What is it?

FYI, It does still seem to be freely available: http://ccpdoctor.com/ *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 12:11 AM, ilya <ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com>

Re: GPG signing commits on Github

Ok cool. I was jumping to conclusions. :P My bad... *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: >

Re: Jenkins on PRs

Ya, that is what I am doing... Thanks... *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > basically t

Re: Jenkins on PRs

ok, thanks... *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > strangely the timeout wasn't reached

Re: Jenkins on PRs

Is there a way to kick off a new Jenkins run on a PR that it had failed on previously? *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Will Stevens <ws

Re: Jenkins on PRs

The reason I bring it up is because I don't want to '--force' PR merges, but it wants PRs to have all green lights (obviously). *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Apr 6

Re: Jenkins on PRs

I have been seeing it fail more often than usual with "timeout" errors. For example, this PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1461 With this run: https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-pr-analysis/719/console *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions E

Jenkins on PRs

Hey All, Anyone know what is going on with Jenkins? It seems to be failing for most PRs. It seems to be timing out, but I am not a Jenkins wizard... Cheers, Will

Re: GPG signing commits on Github

yes, for now. this is something I want to work towards, but we have to be patent and go one step at a time. *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Daan

Re: GPG signing commits on Github

as possible and that we look at the problem from both sides (ours and the ASF). *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweing

Re: GPG signing commits on Github

Yes, I agree with both of you. Maybe I am not being clear. My point is only that we can't allow commit access on Github because then we can not limit it to only valid committers who COULD commit. Is that clearer? *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy

Re: GPG signing commits on Github

be allowed to actually commit via Github. How would this be resolved? *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweing

Re: GPG signing commits on Github

AND that they are a committer in ASF and have an identity there. I think there are more moving parts here than meet the eye, but we can definitely continue the discussion and see where it can lead. *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w

Re: [LOGISTICS] Move 'apache/cloudstack' to 'apache-cloudstack' org

er, I would point you at recent threads related to expanding > the MATT experiment that have surfaced on board@ in recent days > and I would raise an infrastruct...@apache.org email there to > discuss. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > On 4/5/16, 6:34 PM, "Will Stevens"

Re: [LOGISTICS] Move 'apache/cloudstack' to 'apache-cloudstack' org

tics with the Infra team? Thanks everyone... On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com> wrote: > No problem. I will try to keep you CC'ed with this email so you can > contribute. :) > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.

Re: [ACP Doctor] What is it?

to be honest. Especially if you are troubleshooting an environment you didn't setup. *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:28 PM, ilya <ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.

Re: Hooking into the SecurityGroups

Oh sorry, I misunderstood what you needed to do. The events stream may be able to give you a way to hook in and have some code called on Create and Delete, but you are right, it is probably not the best approach for what you need to do. *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud

Re: Hooking into the SecurityGroups

Patrick, did you guys end up doing anything with these events? I know we were messing with that at one point. Did we learn anything interesting? Is it a viable solution for what Nux is trying to do? *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal

Re: Hooking into the SecurityGroups

thing to explore, though it sounds like a level lower than what you're proposing. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Will Stevens" <williamstev...@gmail.com> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Se

Re: Hooking into the SecurityGroups

Slightly off topic, but relevant. Ideally we could easily hook into the event logging and build added logic by simply tying them to specific events. This would limit the hackery and would provide a system that others could use without having to change the core. Has anyone done something like this?

Re: [LOGISTICS] Move 'apache/cloudstack' to 'apache-cloudstack' org

> > -Original Message----- > From: Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com> > Date: Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 10:47 AM > To: jpluser <mattm...@apache.org> > Cc: Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net>, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>, > "dev@cloudsta

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >