Title: Message
Hi,
For
writing a transformer (or another component) I recommend you to read the Carsten
Ziegeler and Matthew Langham book "Cocoon: Building XML Applications", chapter 8
and 9. It is well explained and there are exemples.
Sylvain
-Original Message-From: Han Jon
On Dec 4, 2003, at 11:36 AM, Arje Cahn wrote:
I had a great laugh when I saw a screenshot of my own sitemap
tracer application, copied in a Korean version, rebuilt and
downloadable on the cocoon.apache-korea.org website
(http://cocoon.apache-korea.org/application/c-tracer.html)..
I have no
So, is anyone against reverting back to Recyclable?
If not, I will do it in the next days.
Carsten
-Original Message-
From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Compatibility Issues with 2.2
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I looked into the repository block and I find a *lot* of things
(locking, permissions, properties) that look very much like a
duplication of effort. The Slide project spent years optimizing and
polishing issues like transactionality and locking, do you really want
to
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 12:24, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 03.12.2003 10:01, Leszek Gawron wrote:
Hi Tim,
I am working on a big project using woody (oops CocoonForms) with around
1600 forms. We will probably run some benchmarks to get the sizing info and
I will let you know once we get them
IIRC, your own sitemap tracer trial never made it into Cocoon CVS
neither? So him copying some aspects of it is hardly an ASF concern
(nor is your point really about the copying, of course).
Actually, I made a small mess of the tracer trial, wasn't being particularly original
or creating a
sorry for the late follow-up, I've been out-of-office the last two days.
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 23:04, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 18:02, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
..
My intuition tells me that a BooleanConvertor should return a
Marc Portier wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Marc Portier wrote:
- in fact it also struck me that the @readonly concept only allows
us to choose between two modes of operation : 1/ do load AND save 2/
do only load. Maybe we should provide a generic attribute on all
bindings that looks like
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 12:24, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 03.12.2003 10:01, Leszek Gawron wrote:
Hi Tim,
I am working on a big project using woody (oops CocoonForms) with around
1600 forms. We will probably run some benchmarks to get the sizing info and
I will let you
I'm keyseon, Min and a Korean.
I am a korean undergraduate and I am running , managing, and translating
cocoon.apache-korea.org with korean.
The cocoon.apache-korea.org is translation site with korean.
Since I have sutdied Cocoon, I thought it is good Cocoon is activated and I
hope to help
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So, is anyone against reverting back to Recyclable?
If not, I will do it in the next days.
I thought there was a deeper difference than semantic but
assumed that someone (Berin?) would pipe in and explain.
If you've looked into it carefully and think that's it, I agree
with
Timothy Larson wrote:
--- Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Timothy,
the rudimentary dox (see wiki) on the simple-repeater-binding are
explaining this:
It is currently only supporting binding back to XML (so I suspect that
you were testing versus a java beans backend model here?)
I
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 12:33, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 12:24, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 03.12.2003 10:01, Leszek Gawron wrote:
Hi Tim,
I am working on a big project using woody (oops CocoonForms) with around
1600 forms. We will
Thanks Reinhard for the link. Ehm, from what I see there, there is
no need/deeper meaning for moving to Resettable. Or did I oversee
something?
Carsten
-Original Message-
From: Reinhard Poetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 1:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 12:24, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 03.12.2003 10:01, Leszek Gawron wrote:
...
There's also another problem: the store used to cache the stylesheets
apparently tries to serialize the cached items to disk, as reported
here:
Marc Portier wrote:
Timothy Larson wrote:
--- Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Timothy,
the rudimentary dox (see wiki) on the simple-repeater-binding are
explaining this:
It is currently only supporting binding back to XML (so I suspect
that you were testing versus a java beans backend
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Thanks Reinhard for the link. Ehm, from what I see there, there is
no need/deeper meaning for moving to Resettable. Or did I oversee
something?
Well, this message implies that the plan was to use reflection to
provide back-compatibility with recycle()
Geoff Howard wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Thanks Reinhard for the link. Ehm, from what I see there, there is
no need/deeper meaning for moving to Resettable. Or did I oversee
something?
Well, this message implies that the plan was to use reflection to
provide back-compatibility
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20640.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip /
I was attempting and failing to bind to an XML document. The load
worked, but the save gave the exception.
Sylvain?
I know Sylvain created this:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon-2.1/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/util/jxpath/DOMFactory.java
exactly to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24500.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Unico Hommes wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 4 december 2003 11:03
To: Cocoon-Dev
Subject: Compatibility Issues with 2.2
I'm a little bit concerned about compatibility between 2.1 and 2.2. Now, imho every
component developed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23796.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
We talked about this at the GT and today again on irc, the goal is to
allow structured comments in sitemaps, for example:
map:sitemap
xmlns:map=http://apache.org/cocoon/sitemap/1.0;
xmlns:note=http://apache.org/cocoon/sitemap/annotations/1.0;
note:revision date=2003-12-05
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23796.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We talked about this at the GT and today again on irc, the goal is to
allow structured comments in sitemaps, for example:
snip example/
The TreeProcessor would ignore everything in the annotations namespace
(Sylvain suggests adding a filtering
Timothy Larson wrote:
--- Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We talked about this at the GT and today again on irc, the goal is to
allow structured comments in sitemaps, for example:
snip example/
The TreeProcessor would ignore everything in the annotations namespace
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25242.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Upayavira wrote:
snip/
If relevant, I've started extending the MountTableMatcher to include
the code from the host selector. This means that you can set up
virtual hosts in the matchtable.xml file, and have sitemaps mounted
based upon hostname.
Mmmh... is it good to mix prefix-based and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25242.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Sylvain Wallez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Timothy Larson wrote:
snip embedding files in sitemap idea/
Uh? What kind of files do you want to embed?
A small CocoonForms form or xReporter report may require several files,
such as a mini-sitemap, definition, template, and stylesheet.
When these
From: Bertrand Delacretaz
I've been doing this for two bugs today:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24817
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20640
I think it makes it clear that we're waiting for input from these
people. It will help keeping track of
On 05.12.2003 15:36, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I've been doing this for two bugs today:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24817
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20640
I think it makes it clear that we're waiting for input from these
people. It will help keeping
Timothy Larson wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip /
So what about adding this into the AbstractJXPathBinding: if the object
passed to load/save is a Node, then add the DOMFactory automatically.
I had not looked into that technique, but if we add on-insert-row to the
simple repeater then it
Marc Portier wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip /
I was attempting and failing to bind to an XML document. The load
worked, but the save gave the exception.
Sylvain?
I know Sylvain created this:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
snip/
If relevant, I've started extending the MountTableMatcher to include
the code from the host selector. This means that you can set up
virtual hosts in the matchtable.xml file, and have sitemaps mounted
based upon hostname.
Mmmh... is it good to
--- Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Timothy Larson wrote:
--- Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see a need for a combination of the 'simple' strategy _and_ the use of
unique identifiers:
Not sure if I caught this correctly...
are you suggesting to have these three strategies?:
Upayavira wrote
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
snip/
If relevant, I've started extending the MountTableMatcher
to include
the code from the host selector. This means that you can set up
virtual hosts in the matchtable.xml file, and have
sitemaps mounted
based
-Original Message-
From: Sylvain Wallez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 5 december 2003 16:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load Balancing web applications with mod_proxy...
Upayavira wrote:
snip/
If relevant, I've started extending the MountTableMatcher to
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
The TreeProcessor would ignore everything in the annotations namespace
(Sylvain suggests adding a filtering XMLPipe just after the parser that
reads the sitemap file).
Suggested namespace is http://apache.org/cocoon/sitemap/annotations/1.0
WDYaT?
+1
Timothy Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PS: Don't tell anyone, but really I would like to do it the other
way
around; use a stylesheet to extract the sitemap from a composite
file
and be able to use the cocoon: protocol in map:mount. This is a
little drastic, so I am saying it very very
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24500.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 4 Dec 2003, at 02:22, Unico Hommes wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 4 december 2003 11:03
To: Cocoon-Dev
Subject: Compatibility Issues with 2.2
I'm a little bit concerned about compatibility between 2.1 and 2.2.
Now, imho
On 5 Dec 2003, at 06:43, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
We talked about this at the GT and today again on irc, the goal is to
allow structured comments in sitemaps, for example:
map:sitemap
xmlns:map=http://apache.org/cocoon/sitemap/1.0;
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Marc Portier wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip /
I was attempting and failing to bind to an XML document. The load
worked, but the save gave the exception.
Sylvain?
I know Sylvain created this:
Geoff Howard wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 12:24, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 03.12.2003 10:01, Leszek Gawron wrote:
There's also another problem: the store used to cache the stylesheets
apparently tries to serialize the cached items to disk, as reported
here:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
mega-snip/
Note that it's very unlikely that some component other than store
will directly use transient-store (direct read/write to disk without
a memory front-end isn't efficient). So we may want to write a new
class that combines MRU+Jisp to remove a persistent-store
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
We talked about this at the GT and today again on irc, the goal is to
allow structured comments in sitemaps, for example:
map:sitemap
xmlns:map=http://apache.org/cocoon/sitemap/1.0;
xmlns:note=http://apache.org/cocoon/sitemap/annotations/1.0;
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 12:33, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 12:24, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
...
There's also another problem: the store used to cache the stylesheets
apparently tries to serialize the cached items to disk, as
Bruno Dumon wrote:
...
Aha, I finally got it. The problem is that the selection list doesn't
allow an empty (or null) value.
Is it the problem with selection list only, or with some other classes too?
If you look into the generated HTML
source you'll see that the Dunno choice also has a value of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25242.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Upayavira wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
snip/
If relevant, I've started extending the MountTableMatcher to include
the code from the host selector. This means that you can set up
virtual hosts in the matchtable.xml file, and have sitemaps mounted
based upon hostname.
Unico Hommes wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sylvain Wallez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 5 december 2003 16:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load Balancing web applications with mod_proxy...
Upayavira wrote:
snip/
If relevant, I've started extending the
Timothy Larson wrote:
--- Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Timothy Larson wrote:
--- Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see a need for a combination of the 'simple' strategy _and_ the use of
unique identifiers:
Not sure if I caught this correctly...
are you suggesting to have
Unico Hommes wrote:
Upayavira wrote
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
snip/
If relevant, I've started extending the MountTableMatcher
to include
the code from the host selector. This means that you can set up
virtual hosts in the matchtable.xml file, and
* Tony Collen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-04 15:56]:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 4 Dec 2003, at 00:57, Tony Collen wrote:
It's easy: for each vhost, create whatever subsitemaps you want in
Cocoon, then in each vhost config in httpd.conf, do something like:
---
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23796.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
God, yes, we need this a long time ago.
On 5 Dec 2003, at 14:38, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
[bunch of great stuff]
+1, but I can't help ATM.
--
Stefano.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
58 matches
Mail list logo
