Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.4.0 based on RC2

Gary, thanks for putting together an RC and the thorough description on how to verify releases! (perhaps some got scared.. we don't need everyone to test everything though!) My vote is: +1 (binding) Checked: [+] checksums vs *.sha512 vs VOTE email vs maven repo [+] git tag vs commit [*] git vs

Re: New Sub-project Proposal.

e container implementation or are they more for disk-based collections? -- Stian Soiland-Reyes https://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: New Sub-project Proposal.

gt; concerns about conflicts with existing code. Duplication with of > functionality was the main concern as I recall. > > Claude > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019, 09:43 Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > > > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:12:24 +0200, Gilles Sadowski < > gillese...@gmail.

Re: New Sub-project Proposal.

s email I see it is it's *use* that needs explanation! The only dependencies in that code seem to be within the org.xenei.bloomfilter.collections package which currently include use of Jena's extended iterator classes. This could probably be refactored, if this package is also to be included? (tho

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.0 RC2

My vote: +1 (binding) Verified: +1 sha512 sha256 +1 asc / KEYS +1 src zip vs tar.gz +1 bin zip vs tar.gz vs jar +1 src vs git (missing in src: README.md CONTRIBUTING.md; whitespace differences in commons-daemon-1.2.0-native-src) +1 mvn repo vs dist +1 mvn

Google summer of code ideas?

-- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [RDF] Fluent parser API?

On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:49:23 +, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-re...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > ajs6f and others who like talking about immutability and fluent APIs: > I'll come back to the alternative ParserBuilder interface > which guides the client caller step by step straigh

[RDF] Fluent parser API?

rser interface to implement, no abstract class needed. It might however need to check itself that the config is complete enough for its needs as in theory it could be a null-config with nothing set. I'll come back to the alternative ParserBuilder interface which guides the client caller ste

Re: commons-csv git commit: CSV-216: Avoid Arrays.copyOf()

I've added such comments :) (It was also used for copying the headers, which was also String[]) -- Stian Soiland-Reyes The University of Manchester http://www.esciencelab.org.uk/ http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscr

Re: commons-csv git commit: CSV-216: Avoid Arrays.copyOf()

out and can just go with the cleanest code :) On 16 February 2018 at 11:22, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 February 2018 at 10:01, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: >> I agree in general for .clone() on objects - and I'm trying to move >

Re: commons-csv git commit: CSV-216: Avoid Arrays.copyOf()

; .withValue(x) in an out-of-range column >>>> >>>> >>>> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-csv/repo >>>> Commit: >>>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-csv/commit/f66a8390 >>

Re: [CSV][POLL] How to provide mutable records

On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:10:56 -0700, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> > I've not had time to review this yet but I hope to get to it sometimes this > week. Thanks. I'll wait for that before

Re: [CSV][POLL] How to provide mutable records

On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 19:19:58 +0100, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > This came up also for commons rdf where we also have everything immutable, > which I think is a good principle to keep for modern Java 8 programming. > > So you need a mutator function like

Re: [CSV] Release 1.6

/apache/commons-csv/pull/25 proposing mutator functions. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes The University of Manchester http://www.esciencelab.org.uk/ http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Release Plugin 1.0 base on RC1

gt; 2018-01-14T03:00:00Z > (this is UTC time). > > > > Cheers, > -Rob > > [1] http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For addit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 based on RC2

-0.5.0 >> > commons-rdf-rdf4j-0.5.0 >> > commons-rdf-jsonld-java-0.5.0 >> > commons-rdf-integration-tests-0.5.0 >> > >> > The Maven Staging repository can be found at: >> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 from RC1

hich KEYS file is used after the component has been >> graduated? >> > I'm fine with the KEYS file location being in the vote thread, but just >> thought it >> > would be worth checking. >> >> As I pointed in a previous thread, although we graduated as a componen

Re: [IO] Releasing 2.6

ts should be >>> executed sequentially. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Pascal >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>

Re: [CSV][POLL] How to provide mutable records

This came up also for commons rdf where we also have everything immutable, which I think is a good principle to keep for modern Java 8 programming. So you need a mutator function like in (4) that either returns a new immutable (but changed) CSVRecord; or alternatively a different MutableCSVRecord

Re: [launcher] Move to dormant?

On 13 Aug 2017 7:43 pm, "Pascal Schumacher" wrote: Hello everybody, an opinions on moving commons-launcher to dormant? The last release is from 2007 and their have not been any bugfix or feature addition commits since. +1

Re: [all] Deploying components

Personally I am happy about source distributions accompanying the jars in Maven Central, which are actually rebuildable as opposed to the -source.jars. they continue to be retrievable using Maven version mechanisms, compares to more fragile scripts crawling archive.apache.org (dist only contains

Re: [all] Should our gitignore files contain only build-related entries?

gitignore perfectly set up. (I don't even have one!) Should we add it to https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-build-plugin/ or keep the .gitignores drifting per component? -- Stian Soiland-Reyes The University of Manchester http://www.esciencelab.org.uk/ http://orcid.org/-0001-9

Re: [Numbers] NUMBERS-33

On Tue, 09 May 2017 14:52:09 +0200, Gilles wrote: > [I specifically avoided "apply" so that it is free for when the > component > targets Java 8.] > > Can the "apply" method be static? No, interface implementations can't be static (and it is not possible to make

Re: [Numbers] NUMBERS-33

On Tue, 9 May 2017 13:29:21 +0100, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > I can only see this "value()" style make sense if there is also a common > interface, perhaps DoubleFunction? > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/function/DoubleFunction.

Re: [Numbers] NUMBERS-33

On Mon, 08 May 2017 14:16:12 +0200, Gilles wrote: > > Overall the addition looks good and well commented. The javadoc is a > > bit > > sparse and could do with some more hyperlinks. > Strange; I thought that it was doing rather well on this point. > Can you be more

Re: [Numbers] NUMBERS-33

Thanks! Not being a mathematician I am afraid I have not been able to review the correctness of the equation use. Overall the addition looks good and well commented. The javadoc is a bit sparse and could do with some more hyperlinks. I have some code design questions you may be able to

Re: [lang]

Adding a class with a plan to @deprecate it, something doesn't sound right. :) We should not be putting much effort (and future maintainability) into adding functionality in Lang that jdk8 already (easily) can do. The point of Lang is to complement JDK's Lang classes and friends, not to backport

Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2017 Mentor Registration

Do we have any GSOC2017 ideas for Apache Commons? Tag them with the label "gsoc2017" in Jira! Any volunteers to mentor GSOC2017 students? All committers are eligible, I guess for Commons that is a bit special (as all ASF committers have write access), but I guess if you have contributed before

Immutable builder pattern for parsers?

ld the settings be kept? Fields, map, or what? Does it make sense with an interface, abstract class (keeps settings) and implementations (processess settings), or should we have a single ParserFactory class and have a new internal interface below? -- Stian Soilan

Re: [Text] Consider making the project "multimodule"

Modules of Text would make sense if we get larger differences of dependencies; if it is just different functionality, subpackages within a single module would be better. On 30 Jan 2017 5:53 pm, "Emmanuel Bourg" wrote: > Le 30/01/2017 à 15:16, Rob Tompkins a écrit : > > > I

Re: RDF commons testing

On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:20:46 +, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > BTW - in your approach, would it work to run the tests out of the box > from an IDE like Eclipse? I think that is quite important so Commons RDF > can be maintainable by many people in Apache Com

Re: RDF commons testing

ch, would you still have to make a such specialization, or is that automatic? BTW - in your approach, would it work to run the tests out of the box from an IDE like Eclipse? I think that is quite important so Commons RDF can be maintainable by many people in Apache Commons. -- Stian

Re: StringUtils.isEmpty() family of methods on Objects

Agree with Benedikt here, if it's only the .toString() that is important, then "string" should appear in the method name; otherwise we need to do Commons Collections style handling of anything that can be empty or not. To support null (which isn't really "empty" but missing), perhaps just have

Re: [rdf] roles after graduation

I agree on not expanding too much on the roles and would favour removing PPMC roles except for those who are listed only as emeritus. On 17 Jan 2017 10:30 am, "Jochen Wiedmann" wrote: > Hi, Sergio, > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Sergio Fernández

Re: [REPORT][DRAFT] Apache Commons Board Report for December 2016

We had waited for Infra to do the rename/move of the commons rdf git repository; that was just completed two days ago. I did not republish site yet from src as half the pages would have many broken links to the new repo; in src/site it is already updated. Sergio was looking at ways to ensure the

Re: [VOTE][RC6] Release Commons RNG 1.0 (reminder)

On 11 December 2016 at 06:11, Gilles wrote: >> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons RNG 1.0 (from RC6). >> Tag name: >> RNG_1_0_RC6 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') >> >> Tag URL: >> >> >> >>

Re: [ALL] Why is the component's web site part of the release vote?

That sounds like not a problem at all as RAT passes on the RC. Just regenerate the site after releasing. (We have to verify download page manually anyway). (Perhaps building the site from the RC's tar-ball rather than the "dirty" mvn tree post release is safer) I think it would only block a

Re: Commons release policy

t; chas >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.

Re: [CANCE][VOTE][LAZY] Release Commons Parent POM 42 based on RC1

Dec 2016 4:41 pm, "Gary Gregory" <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: So, when I run: mvn clean deploy -Duser.name=ggregory -Prelease -Ptest-deploy The zip and gz files are created but not signed or hashed. Thoughts? Gary On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <

Re: [CANCE][VOTE][LAZY] Release Commons Parent POM 42 based on RC1

> wrote: > > > >> I am canceling this VOTE to deal with the missing src files. > >> > >> Gary > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I did "mvn

Re: [VOTE][RC5] Release "Apache Commons RNG" version 1.0

; [ ] -1 No, do not release it because ... > > This vote will close in 72 hours, at 2016-12-03T00:00:00Z (this is UTC > time). > -- > > > Thanks, > Gilles > > > --------

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Commons Parent POM 42 based on RC1

;garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Just a thing I noticed.. >> >> In https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/commons- >> parent/commons-parent-41/ >> and befor

Re: [ALL] Version number(s) for modular components

il...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:23:37 +, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > >> Yeah, that could be the better way, with a branched off commit for the >> "shrunk" project with a smaller list in the parent, then no >> particular flags are n

Re: [RDF] Graduating Commons RDF to Commons PMC

pers" are 'Admins'), and asked INFRA to change it to the commons notification scheme (issues@commons). I also put Apache Commons Developers (e.g. issues@commons) as the "Lead". I also renamed the Jenkins build from incubator-commonsrdf to commons-rdf (but did not change it's git repo settin

Re: [ALL] Version number(s) for modular components

Yeah, that could be the better way, with a branched off commit for the "shrunk" project with a smaller list in the parent, then no particular flags are needed to build from the resulting tag or source repo. I initially planned to do so within the Taverna project (before we moved to ASF), as it

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Commons Parent POM 42 based on RC1

0459=as2=garygregory-20=cadb800f39946ec62ea2b1af9fe6a2b8> >> >> >> <http://ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20=am2=1=1617290459> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >> >> <https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1935182021/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8=1789=9325=19351

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Commons Parent POM 42 based on RC1

rygregory-20=31ecd1f6b6d1eaf8886ac902a24de418%22 > > > < http://ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20=am2=1=1935182021 > > Spring Batch in Action > < https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1935182951/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8=1789=9325=1935182951=%7B%7BlinkCode%7D%7D=garygregory-20=%7B%7Blink_id%7D%7D%22%3ESpring%20Batch%20in%20Action > > > < http://ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20=am2=1=1935182951 > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718

[RDF] Graduating Commons RDF to Commons PMC

ll send a separate reminder about this to the dev@commonsrdf list before it closes) -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For a

Re: [ALL] Version number(s) for modular components

I think Gilles' reasoning is sound for semantic versioning and releases, in line with OSGi principles. However I think that would be better suited in a large or enterprise project with mainly internal usersnpf the libraries that can play along, not in Apache Commons which are making general

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Commons RDF as a new component

On 23 November 2016 at 13:47, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > [Note: this is the Commons PMC vote on dev@commons - there's a > concurrent IPMC VOTE thread on general@incubator] > > Please VOTE on graduating Commons RDF as new component: Thanks to everyone who

Re: [RNG][ALL] Official vs "courtesy" code ?

I think I'll tend towards agreeing with Jochen here, rather get half the modules out early than fight ourselves with versioning workarounds if the rest of the modules are not ready for prime time. However I see concerns of selective "part releases" and reproducible builds, so I would do this

Re: [RNG] Aggregate artefacts (for archive download)

Within the assembly descriptor you can use a for the modules you want to include. See https://github.com/apache/commons-jcs/blob/trunk/commons-jcs-dist/src/assembly/bin.xml for example, here the assembly is done in a -dist submodule itself, but it can also be done directly in the parent as long

[VOTE] Accept Commons RDF as a new component

@commonsrdf: +1 Stian Soiland-Reyes (Commons PMC binding) +1 Benedikt Ritter (Commons PMC binding) +1 Gary Gregory (Commons PMC binding) Proposed component name: rdf Proposed package name: org.apache.commons.rdf Source code of RDF component: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator

[RDF] Draft introduction to Commons RDF

, which would require use of Maven for dependencies. I thing a second tutorial could cover that aspect. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org

Re: [BEANUTILS] Docker Jenkins Job?!

You can delete it, it was my attempt to test the build on different jdk versions not already on Jenkins slaves, I think there were some oracle vs OpenJDK issues in the last Release Candidate. On 18 Nov 2016 10:21 pm, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > Hello, > > we have this jenkins

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 Released

ache/commons/commons- >> jcs-core/2.0-beta-2/ >> >> Bye, Thomas. >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional comma

Re: [ALL] How to "deploy" selectively (multi-module project)?

; Regards, > Gilles > > [1] See the contents of the module here: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-rng.git;a=tree;f=commons-rng-build-tools;h=a126e20df3ed8921783b0ca4754e33f6ed6e9692;hb=refs/heads/RNG-30__sampling > > >> >> Cheers, >> Jörg

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: commons-beanutils #17

> <https://builds.apache.org/job/commons-beanutils/ws/target/surefire/surefire6659744902052208714tmp> > > <https://builds.apache.org/job/commons-beanutils/ws/target/surefire/surefire_0173508163941142471tmp> > [ERROR] -> [Help 1] > [ERROR] > [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e > switch. > [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging. > [ERROR] > [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please > read the following articles: > [ERROR] [Help 1] > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoFailureException > [JENKINS] Archiving > <https://builds.apache.org/job/commons-beanutils/ws/pom.xml> to > commons-beanutils/commons-beanutils/1.9.4-SNAPSHOT/commons-beanutils-1.9.4-SNAPSHOT.pom > Sending e-mails to: dev@commons.apache.org > channel stopped > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: How to publish multi-module site..?

l...@harfang.homelinux.org> > wrote: > >> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:26:41 +, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >> >>> Hi, (in particular Gilles and Artem) >>> >>> What was the status of how to do a multi-site publish? I just tried >>> now

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF as new component?

gt; > public RDF createFactory() { > > return new SimpleRDF(); > > } > > > > Is/should a service loader be used to allow pluging in/discovering > > implementations? > > > > Gary > > > > On Nov 16, 2016 5:22 AM, "Stian Soiland-Reye

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF as new component?

e member and recently reviewing the > still evolving RDF4J integration, have been deferred to the future and > they would not be easily addressed if a 1.0 release line was declared > now. > > However, that isn't a reason to keep it in incubation. Good luck! > > Cheers, > > Peter

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF as new component?

OK, I'll go straight to VOTE in a couple of days to allow dev@commonsrdf list to sync up first :) (One questions would be how to do mailing list transition) On 16 November 2016 at 13:30, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Stian Soiland-

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons RDF 0.3.0-incubating

t;Resource Description Framework" > would help as there are other possible meanings for the acronym RDF. > Most are unlikely to apply but the reader should not have to research this. > > > On 16 November 2016 at 11:15, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: >>

[DISCUSS] Commons RDF as new component?

github.com/apache/incubator-commonsrdf/ https://commonsrdf.incubator.apache.org/apidocs/ -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional c

Re: How to publish multi-module site..?

On 16 November 2016 at 11:26, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > But I could not get it to publish the submodule sites correctly. > mvn clean package site-deploy > > overwrites the main site with the last module's site instead! (Do not use!) https://maven.apache

How to publish multi-module site..?

target/site-content/commons-rdf-$a ; done cd target/site-content/ svn add commons-rdf-* svn commit -m "submodules" Any ideas..? -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: de

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons RDF 0.3.0-incubating

indicate that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF. sha1 checksums: 965cbbb52946ae9ba710ab19a8fb931fbfe65e7f apache-commons-rdf-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip 9e08b3edcc633eb07a1c303b1939a0faaebb6c1f apache-commons-rdf-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org

Re: [crypto] package access on ivars?

ue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:40 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 8 November 2016 at 09:30, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:19 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> On 8 November 2016 at 07:34

Re: Enable travis-ci for commons-io?

Sounds great to me, particularly if it can test the pull requests! For testing with Java 8 on Travis you may need a little workaround, as on the default build slave you get a broken oldie jdk8 build: https://github.com/apache/incubator-commonsrdf/blob/master/.travis.yml On 8 Nov 2016 7:34 am,

Re: [crypto] package access on ivars?

I don't think binary compatibility should include package level access, as long as that package is only used within a single Commons JAR, then we are free to change those, at least in a new minor release. (I would say even patch level unless serialisation is used). In particular, package level

FindBugs project announced as 'dead', blaims code rot and lack of maintainers

or all the evil. This > code can't be fixed, it must be rewritten. ..but the main problem seems to be lack of maintaners. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@comm

Re: [ALL] hashes of signatures

Apache BVal and find the files are there on the staging repo. Is anyone > aware of having fixed this issue in the Commons build? I can't find any > config that seems relevant. > > Thanks, > Matt -- Stian Soiland-Reyes

Re: [VOTE] DBCP 2.2 rc2

gt; > > > >> >> > > > Clirr Report (compared to 2.1.1): >> >> > > > http://musigma.org/dbcp/clirr-report.html >> >> > > > >> >> > > > RAT Report: >> >> > > > http://musigma.org/dbc

Re: [VOTE] DBCP 2.2 rc2

; > > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, >> > > > i.e. sometime after 10-Aug-2016 >> > > > >> > > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts >> > > > [ ] +0 OK, but... >> > > > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...

Re: [lang] To Java 7

- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718

Re: [lang] To Java 7

+1, in line with earlier discussed upgrade path we can then do a Java 7 minor version before we jump to Java 8. On 23 Oct 2016 9:39 am, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > I don't see improvements from a user perspective when upgrading to Java 7, > but Java 6 is long EOL. So +1 from

Re: [RDF] Rename RDFTermFactory to RDFFactory / RDF?

On 21 October 2016 at 16:37, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > Great, I've got a branch suggesting changing it to RDFFactory and have > already changed the implementations to "JenaFactory" and "RDF4JFactory" > > I'll raise it as a pull re

Re: [RDF] Rename RDFTermFactory to RDFFactory / RDF?

gt; --- > A. Soroka > Committer/PMC Apache Jena > > On 2016-09-15 07:11 (-0400), Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Should we rename RDFTermFactory to RDFFactory? Or just RDF? Someone > > suggested that some time ago. >

Re: [ALL] Component with multiple modules?

Commons RDF as well, although it is still published under its own incubator subdomain. On 20 Oct 2016 2:00 pm, "Gilles" wrote: > Hi. > > Can you point me at a component that has a config supporting > multiple modules? > > Thanks, > Gilles > > >

Re: [logging][proposal] Statement of intent/status

+1 - we can show how Commons Logging user code can be updated to log4j2. I think many users of Commons Logging now is through the libraries they depend on. On 17 Oct 2016 6:45 pm, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > Hi All, > > I propose that we state that: > - Apache Commons

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC1

s/dist/dev/commons/lang/LANG_3_5_RC1 ? > > Regards, > Benedikt -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[COMPRESS] [MATH] [VALIDATOR] [PARENT] Removing old releases from dist?

for different JDK compatibility) -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [RNG] modules vs projects

quot;utils" and you force users of "core" to upgrade. > And the converse is also true. > >> >>> Just to spare one vote every two years? >> >> >> And multiple projects would hypothetically ease one migration every five >> years? > > > This would happen for _every_ release. > > Gilles > > >> >> Emmanuel Bourg >> >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [ALL] Character set in dist area? (e.g. RELEASE-NOTES.txt)

gt; > +1 > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718

Re: clirr-maven-plugin fails - update to 2.8?

mp may be a good alternative. > > >> >> >> - Should we use the Animal Sniffer plugin for all components to build with >> a more recent Java version than the one the component requires and still >> check that the code does not use new Java APIs? >> > > Ye

Re: Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 released

On 26 September 2016 at 12:59, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Apache > Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 Bah.. "Subject: Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT]" -- hope it still counts :-( BTW - all other emails on ht

Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 released

-collections from 3.2.1 to 3.2.2 (CVE-2015-4852). Thanks to Gary Gregory. * BEANUTILS-490: Update java requirement to Java 6. Thanks to Gary Gregory. * BEANUTILS-492: IndexedPropertyDescriptor tests now pass on Java 8. Thanks to Stian Soiland-Reyes. * BEANUTILS-495: DateConverterTestBase fails on M/d/yy

clirr-maven-plugin fails - update to 2.8?

clirr-maven-plugin/2.8/clirr-maven-plugin-2.8.pom https://github.com/mojohaus/clirr-maven-plugin/releases/tag/clirr-maven-plugin-2.8 -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe

[ALL] Character set in dist area? (e.g. RELEASE-NOTES.txt)

t breaks anything on the mirrors. So far so good: stain@biggiebuntu:~/src/95$ curl -s -I http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/beanutils/RELEASE-NOTES.txt | grep Content-Type Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Views..? -- Stian Soiland-Reyes

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC3

On 21 September 2016 at 17:54, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 (from RC3) > (..) > 4c285c2c9af35be0ea77e6ada9674e2c7b226fa6 commons-beanutils-1.9.3-bin.tar.gz > b2e6f70aaa2ca500899cb149c919b6b

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC3

, platform encoding: UTF-8 OS name: "linux", version: "4.4.0-38-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix" On 25 September 2016 at 01:05, Henning Schmiedehausen <henn...@schmiedehausen.org> wrote: > Builds fine on Mac with JDK8 > > +1 > > -h >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC3

heckstyle.xml in SVN. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC3

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-497 on doclint errors. -- it's quite a few for beanutils! :-( I hope as this only happens with "mvn site" on Oracle JDK 8++ I hope the [VOTE] can proceed.. -- Stian Soiland-Re

Re: [codec] ready for a release

g > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: AW: Java8 utilities

out of the picture. > > Gary > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> +1 to be brave and make Lang 3.6 be Java 8, so Lambda helpers can join >> here. I have a couple of Stream helpers that could also

Re: [ALL] Valid reasons for blocking a release?

ng you see, our site or >>> github, is wrong or missing info. It could make one wonder about >>> overall attention to detail... > >> Nothing _looks_ lame. > > Please mind Gary's "IMO" in the paragraph above. > > &qu

Re: AW: Java8 utilities

subscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Editio

[VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC3

r glitches: ... [ ] -1 No, do not release it because ... This vote will be open for at least 72 hours, let's say 2016-09-25T08:00:00Z -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: de

Re: [RDF] Include RDFParserBuilder in 0.3.0?

On 15 September 2016 at 12:06, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > [[ Cross-posting - let's try to reply to dev@commons. ]] > b) Move RDFParserBuilder to package org.apache.commonsrdf.experimental > or similar (allowing us to fully change it for the next version)

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC2

The below vote is CANCELLED. Thanks to all who helped review. I'll improve the build to match better our minimum requirement of Java 6 and try again. On 14 September 2016 at 16:45, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.

  1   2   3   >