to ConversationScoped ;) )
- Mail original -
De : Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
À : dev@deltaspike.apache.org
Cc :
Envoyé le : Jeudi 6 juin 2013 15h21
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features
#1 imo those names don't fit at all.
#2 starting the scope
:
Envoyé le : Jeudi 6 juin 2013 15h21
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features
#1 imo those names don't fit at all.
#2 starting the scope explicitly is against the initial idea
(please
have a
look at [1] and even [2] as well as any other std. scope) and it's
you are very welcome to suggest a better name.
regards,
gerhard
2013/6/6 titou10 titou10 titou10.tito...@gmail.com
Suggestion:
When porting CODI ConversationScope to DS, should it be possible to
NOT name this Scope ConversationScope
Currently, when using CODI, it is very confusing to have
DialogScope ?
FlowScope ? (Possible confusion with JSF 2.2 ?)
ExtendedConversationScope ?
CustomConversationScope ?
ConversationCustomScope ?
ConversationExtendedScope ?
ExtendedScope ?
DSConversationScope ?
RequestExtendedScope ?
Also should this scope :
- be started and terminated explicitely
all (or most of my
needs) and is really easy to use.
Adrian
De : titou10 titou10 titou10.tito...@gmail.com
À : dev@deltaspike.apache.org
Envoyé le : Jeudi 6 juin 2013 14h56
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features
DialogScope ?
FlowScope ? (Possible
UltraScope ;-)
Quoting hantsy han...@yahoo.com.cn:
WizardScoped or FlowScoped
On 6/6/2013 20:56, titou10 titou10 wrote:
DialogScope ?
FlowScope ? (Possible confusion with JSF 2.2 ?)
ExtendedConversationScope ?
CustomConversationScope ?
ConversationCustomScope ?
ConversationExtendedScope ?
@ #1: users use it e.g. also for whole sub-sections and/or use-cases of an
application - it doesn't fit imo
@ #2: is reserved (see jsf 2.2+)
regards,
gerhard
2013/6/6 hantsy han...@yahoo.com.cn
WizardScoped or FlowScoped
On 6/6/2013 20:56, titou10 titou10 wrote:
DialogScope ?
FlowScope
...@gmail.com
À : dev@deltaspike.apache.org
Cc :
Envoyé le : Jeudi 6 juin 2013 15h21
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features
#1 imo those names don't fit at all.
#2 starting the scope explicitly is against the initial idea (please
have a
look at [1] and even [2] as well
2013, 13:07
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features
Mark,
A little aggressive based on how long it took to get 0.4? Should
this
be
a small release then?
I'd like to add some level of BeanValidation support in this
release,
looks like the CODI and Seam features are pretty similar
le : Lundi 3 juin 2013 14h43
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features
For us DS v0.5 should be focused on the JSF module and particularly
on porting CODI scopes top get rid of CODI asap. ie:
- port the CODI Conversation and related scopes to DS (Group etc.)
- Enhance the WindowScope
10 matches
Mail list logo