Re: Moving JBoss FreeMarker IDE (Eclipse plugin) to the ASF?

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > [...] > It's our turn. I'm really just waiting to hear if the other PPMC > members think that this should be attempted (like, if we want that > code at all), then I will ask ASF Legal. > > I don't feel much comfortable

Re: Started graduation resolution DISCUSS on general@incubator.a.o

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > [...] Though it's not clear from > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html# > graduating_to_a_top_level_project > if after the board decision when can we actually do a non-incubating > release. Pretty much

Re: Proposal for FREEMARKER-84: More flexible handlig of missing templates

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 8:04 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Some more opinions guys? Especially as we got one opinion against the > feature. > Just to clarify my opinion: I am not against this feature; I simply don't consider it a must since there are some workaround to get a

Re: Proposal for FREEMARKER-84: More flexible handlig of missing templates

For less common use cases like this my preference is to defer the implementation to the template developer rather than adding complexity to the language. If I understand the use case that originated this request, something similar could be achieved with a simple trick like the following: 1) the

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache FreeMarker Project from Incubator to TLP

I think the last final steps should be: 1) send the charter proposal, already prepared by Daniel, to the Incubator general list for review before the vote [*] 2) start the graduation vote in the Incubator general list; see "The Recommendation Vote" [**] Then (if the recommendation vote will be

Re: Status file date issues

> > > Daniel Dekany wrote: So, David, can > you join the IPMC? I know, it's annoying and all, but rule are rules. > David, since you are an ASF member you can simply send an email to the general@incubator list asking to be added to the IPMC. Jacopo

Re: Resolution draft for graduation, members

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:30 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > You would probably be better served by having someone else volunteer to be > PMC chair. My reasoning for that is exactly for the same reason you put > yourself there. You are the most active committer and obviously

Re: Resolution draft for graduation, members

; for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache FreeMarker Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache FreeMarker Project: > > * Dáni

Re: Please check and sign off our Podling Report for January!

It looks great to me, thank you Daniel.The only change I would do is to add Woonsan also in the section: "When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?". Jacopo On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Dear PPMC members! > > Please read the draft of

Re: Attempting graduation?

a "resolution" general incubator list before a > > >> VOTE, etc. (OFBiz is brough up as a good example there.) Anyone > > >> intends to tackle these? > > >> > > >> > > >> Wednesday, November 8, 2017, 1:34:24 AM, Daniel Dek

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

I don't know if there will be issues with a certificate for sub-sub domain but I agree with the extra careful approach outlined in your email because I think it is better to cope with some small headaches now but do our best to be prepared asap for a successful graduation. Thanks, Jacopo On

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache FreeMarker 2.3.27-incubating released

Congratulations! Jacopo On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Thank you Woonsan! > > Anything to improve on the release process itself, and on its > documentation? (I did some updates in the how-to, on the places where > you had questions, so apart from

Re: Changing official domain to freemarker.apache.org now? Was: Migrating [try.]freemarker.org to HTTPS, anyone?

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:12 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > There is no requirement that you ever get rid of the freemarker.org > domain. This is not the first project to have its own domain. > Exactly. For example OFBiz owns the ofbiz.org domain since before the

Re: Changing official domain to freemarker.apache.org now? Was: Migrating [try.]freemarker.org to HTTPS, anyone?

+1 for the migration. And right after that I think we should start the graduation process. Jacopo On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > As this issue that we aren't using an apache.org domain comes up again > and again, I propose that we switch to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.27 (incubating)

+1 (binding) Jacopo On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote: > Hi all, > > Please vote on releasing FreeMarker 2.3.27-incubating! If this voting > passes, another similar voting will be started on > gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can

Re: Preparing for 2.3.27 - please check the change log

+1 Jacopo On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > We have quite a few bug fixes piled up, so I it's time for a new > release. There's a few very minor new feature as well (mostly in > response to issues raised on StackOverflow). Please review them, also >

Re: Please reivew (then sign) our July poddlin report

Looks good. Signed. Thank you Jacopo On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > PPMC members, please review (then sign) our July poddlin report! > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2017 > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > >

Re: FreeMarker Online Tester legal status and hosting

So, should I bring this up on incubator-general, > or where? > > > Tuesday, May 2, 2017, 7:49:18 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > > Le 02/05/2017 à 13:23, Daniel Dekany a écrit : > >> Tuesday, May 2, 2017, 12:19:47 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >> > >>&g

Re: FreeMarker Online Tester legal status and hosting

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > We have received the source code donation of said service form > Kenshoo. Pradeep has changed the license headers and renamed the > packages, and did some other cleanup. While we plan to do further > development, the

New ASF Member from FreeMarker Community

Good news: Daniel Dekany from the FreeMarker community has been invited to become member of the Apache Software Foundation. Many congratulations Daniel!!! Jacopo

Re: Please reivew (then sign) our April poddlin report

Thank you, signed! Jacopo On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Here it is: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2017 > > I have applied all changes Jacopo has recommended. > > I have added a sentence about the age of the project, so that they > will

Re: Poddling report draft - needs discussion

requests, > updating the project home page, and more. > > We have worked some on our Twitter channel, such as we have a new > logo and some posts. > > When were the last committers or PMC members elected? > > 2017-02-13 Woonsan Ko, committer (non-PMC) > > Date of last release: > > 2017-03-25 > > Signed-off-by: > > [ ](freemarker) Jacopo Cappellato > [ ](freemarker) Jean-Frederic Clere > [ ](freemarker) David E. Jones > [ ](freemarker) Ralph Goers > [ ](freemarker) Sergio Fernández > I like it! Thanks Jacopo > > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.26 (incubating)

+1 (binding) signature is ok sha checksum is ok md5 checksum is ok build and tests are successful tests on Apache OFBiz release branch 15.12 are successful Jacopo On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Hi all, > > Please vote on releasing FreeMarker

Re: New committer: Woonsan Ko

Welcome Woonsan! Jacopo On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache FreeMarker > (incubating) has invited Woonsan Ko to become a committer and we are > pleased to announce that he has accepted. > > Woonsan Ko

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Which logo?

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Julien NICOLAS wrote: > > I don't know what is needed but I transfert all rights of my logos to the > freemarker project. :) Julien has already filed a ICLA so we should be good with that. Jacopo

Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment

Oh yes, I see the same when I open the page in a different browser! Please ignore and thanks. Jacopo On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote: > Monday, January 23, 2017, 4:00:06 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:39

Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > I have just went ahead and published what you have written on the site > (with some minor edits). > > The related pages: > http://freemarker.org/report-security-vulnerabilities.html > And I have also added this: >

Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > I don't know, it's visible for me. Maybe you haven't waited for the > publishing commit, or it's a browser cache issue? > > Weird... do you see the link under the COMMUNITY group in the left bar? Jacopo

Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment

Hi Daniel, thanks for your commit. I have noticed that there is no link to the new security page in the left bar but it used to generate one when I tested in my local box. Is it intentional or I am missing something? Jacopo On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.capp

Re: incubator-freemarker-docgen git commit: Changed footer layout to accept arbitrary long copyright text. Added copyrightSuffix setting, where you can add the trademark notes and such.

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:39 PM, wrote: > Repository: incubator-freemarker-docgen > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master 05ddf9339 -> f968b192e > > > Changed footer layout to accept arbitrary long copyright text. Added > copyrightSuffix setting, where you can add the

Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Thanks! But, do all PMC members get a notification if there's a mail > waiting for moderation at private@freemarker.i.a.o? Does somebody know > that (or else I will try it)? > Only the mailing list moderators will

Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Though it's still a good point that we should say something to the > users... Right now, the best they can do is figuring out who the key > personal are, and write to them privately. > > This is a good point: I have

Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > For QU30 we can easily ask infra to create a security ML. > For the wiki page at least a link to http://www.apache.org/security > /#vulnerability-handling would help. > We could, but we can also postpone

Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > [...] Note that for instance OFBiz only links to its security ML from > http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html > > BTW out of subject and it's maybe late for OFBiz (was not a requirement > then), but

Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment

I have created a wiki page (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KBUIB) > inspired by the Apache ranger example and added the first responses for a > start. > > Feel free to add, edit, remark. Any help is appreciated. > > Regards, > > Michael > > > Am 07.01.17

Re: Proposed Tweet re: Logo Vote

m need to be fixed, the community > will found a technical solution without starting a discussion on the colour > of the method ^^. Add a colour issue in this problem, and the thread will > be longer ;) > > Thanks for this sharing, I'll share it also :) > > Julien. > > &

Re: Proposed Tweet re: Logo Vote

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > ... > (On the same time, the more technical questions remain unanswered. Not > surprisingly anyway, so it's fine, I was just surprised how many are > reading this list regularly, based on the number of vote answers.)

Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a > new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all, > changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling > if you

Re: Proposed Tweet re: Logo Vote

+1 I like it, thanks Il 19 Gen 2017 12:37 PM, "Sharan Foga" ha scritto: > Hi Everyone > > As we have a current vote in progress about the twitter logo, I'd like to > tweet about it and maybe get some additional involvement from the > freemarker twitter followers. The proposed

Re: [VOTE] Which logo?

I like the first. Jacopo On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > We will replace our square logo at Twitter > (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo > in the future elsewhere too. > > Which one do you prefer from the *top*

Re: Refining the Freemarker product description to follow trademark best practices

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Huh? It's software. There are no FreeMarker cars and FreeMarker > motorcycles and FreeMarker trucks ... FreeMarker is the product > itself. It's not like BMW, it's like BMW i3, where BMW is Apache in > our case. We

Updated the Incubator STATUS page of the Freemarker project

For your information, I have updated our STATUS page [*] with the following minor changes: 1) mentioned that freemarker.org is owned by the ASF 2) added reference to the new Wiki space 3) added one missing date to the todo list (which is now complete!) Jacopo [*]

Re: Proposed Tweets for Freemarker Twitter Account

Sharan, I love each of them, thank you. One small remark below: On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Sharan Foga wrote: > [...] > Interested in a simple Freemarker UI? Share your ideas and collaborate > with us > https://s.apache.org/yQUr For clarity, this maybe should be

Relevant extract from the Incubator report to the Board

Hi all, I would like to highlight the following paragraph from the draft of this month's Incubator report: == The following appear to be close from maturity model: - Airflow - BatchEE - FreeMarker - Metron == We are getting closer to a

Re: Completing the copyright footer of the FreeMarker website

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > I have added the trademark notice to the footer (see on > http://freemarker.org/). I have removed the "All rights reserved." > part, as it weren't used on the OFBiz page either. (The Manual wasn't > regenerated, so it's

Re: Using Social Media to Help Promote Freemarker

Hi Denis, welcome! Please see inline: On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Denis Bredelet wrote: > I am thinking of contributing a very simple UI for FreeMarker. Something > able to read a single template and process it with a datamodel pulled from > various sources (user

Re: Using Social Media to Help Promote Freemarker

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Hi, > > First of all, thanks for the offer! We don't really have social media > presence (or other marking), so surely it would be helpful if we can > improve there. Now, I'm not a social media consumer, and I'm pretty >

Re: About a Freemarker template evaluator service

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Christoph Rüger wrote: > +1 > > watch out for security / template injection attacks: e.g. see > http://blog.portswigger.net/2015/08/server-side-template-injection.html > > set > >

Re: Comitter how-to page, step-by-step instructions for making releases

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > I did and bravely published a page to help future Committers (by which > I mean people who can commit directly into the Apache repo, and > certainly can do releases too). It's mostly to help in technical > things, such

Re: About a Freemarker template evaluator service

< jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Le 03/01/2017 à 09:32, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> Hi all, >> >> a couple of days ago Daniel brought to my attention the site/service: >> >> http://freemarker-online.kenshoo.com/ >> >> They provide

Re: PPMC members, please check our January Poddling Report!

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:39 PM, David E Jones wrote: > > Thank you Jacopo. Looking at it again a little bit ago it still shows as > immutable. My guess is that my permission got > reset and I'll need to request it again. It's very helpful that you signed > it for me as I'm on site

Re: PPMC members, please check our January Poddling Report!

Signed off! Thank you Jacopo On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote: > I have added our report to > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017. PPMC members, please > read it, and sign it off if you agree! > > > Tuesday, January 3,

Re: [DRAFT] FreeMarker report - January 2017

It would be also great if any of you could write a short summary (i.e. a sentence or two) of the changes to the codebase we did in the last quarter and add it to the section "How has the project developed since the last report?" Jacopo On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Jacopo

About a Freemarker template evaluator service

Hi all, a couple of days ago Daniel brought to my attention the site/service: http://freemarker-online.kenshoo.com/ They provide a nice online tool to evaluate any Freemarker template by providing the template code and its context. Wouldn't be nice is we could offer that or a similar service

Re: [DRAFT] FreeMarker report - January 2017

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Is there any "political" reason for not mentioning that we also plan > to try to make the project more attractive and more approachable by > making a branch which drops the very much significant legacy burden? > Or

[DISCUSS] graduation (again!)

Hi all, we have discussed this already some months ago and I think it is time to restart the conversation now: does this community feel ready to graduate to a Top Level Project (TLP) at the ASF? I think that the incubation phase has been very useful for the FreeMarker project/community:

Re: Podling Report Reminder - October 2016

In this report, under the section "Not yet ready to graduate", Freemarker is listed under the group "No release". However this is not accurate since Freemarker did a release in the Incubator: http://freemarker.org/freemarkerdownload.html Would it be possible to update this section? Freemarker

Re: Please read and sign the Podling Report

Thank you Daniel, looks good to me. I have signed it, but it would be nice to add a sentence to log that we have positively completed the verifications about possible name conflicts. Regards, Jacopo On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Ugh... subject

Re: [mentors] Check out FreeMarker status page

That document would be a good asset for the project! Jacopo > > > Thursday, June 30, 2016, 6:18:47 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > > > I have spent some time reading the graduation guidelines, specifically > [*]. > > > > Here I am quoting the preparation s

Re: [mentors] Check out FreeMarker status page

I have spent some time reading the graduation guidelines, specifically [*]. Here I am quoting the preparation steps before graduation: Preparations - Complete (and sign off) tasks documented in the status file - Ensure

Re: Podling Report Reminder - July 2016

Hi Daniel, the report looks good to me, thank you. Maybe we could rephrase the following section: = Most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: 1. Find more active contributors, discuss how to proceed without that 2. Fill blanks left on the

Re: Podling Report Reminder - July 2016

Indeed a good chance! And it is exactly one year since the graduation started. Maybe we could do an internal vote to formally express the FreeMarker PMC willingness to graduate, based on this: Organizational acceptance of responsibility for the project - If graduating to a new PMC, has the

Re: Graduation issues

makes sense, thank you Sergio. Jacopo On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < > jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Should I start the thread today? Should I send

Re: Graduation issues

I agree that it is the right time to discuss graduation. In my opinion the incubation process for Freemarker has been successful and for this reason I will vote +1 for the graduation. As anticipated when we initially discussed the incubation, one critical aspect of the Freemarker project was its

Re: Podling Report Reminder - April 2016

eatures and > fixes, > >> we > >> > have adjusted the source code and build process to follow Apache best > >> > practices more closely, and to be more appealing for contributors > >> > (switching to Java 5, fixing formatting where it didn't fit the modern > >&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

+1 for both releases (binding) The release files look good, I have built the jar from source files and tested in the OFBiz framework. Jacopo On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Hi all, > > Please vote on releasing FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating! This

Re: [VOTE] Release FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating, attempt 3

wrote: > Those also look fine to me. The artifacts has the new NOTICE files, > and the the sha1 and md5 checksums are correct. > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > > > Saturday, January 16, 2016, 4:34:54 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > > > I was tal

Re: [VOTE] Release FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating, attempt 3

I was talking about the files here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/freemarker/freemarker/2.3.24-rc01-incubating/ Jacopo On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote: > Friday, January 15, 2016, 9:46:31 AM, Jacopo Cappell

Re: Signing the Januray report (and mailing list subscriptions)

The report looks good to me, thank you Daniel. One minor suggestion: you could add the name of the new committer near the date of the addition at the bottom of the report. Jacopo On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Dear FreeMarker Mentors! > > Please

Re: Should freemarker.org remain the canonical domain?

I think that the project should keep it, and it should redirect to the actual domain: freemarker.org --> freemarker.incubator.apache.org (now) freemarker.org --> freemarker.apache.org (after graduation) We did something similar with OFBiz and its ofbiz.org domain. Jacopo On Tue, Nov 3, 2015

Re: PPMC members, please read and sign the October report

Thanks, the report looks good to me, I have signed it. Jacopo On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/October2015 > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > >

Re: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?

he new copyright To all, please review my notes above and correct them if you see any errors. Jacopo > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > > > Monday, September 21, 2015, 9:43:54 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >> >> On Sep 20, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Daniel Dekany &

Re: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?

ttp://creadur.apache.org/rat/ Regards, Jacopo > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > > > Sunday, September 20, 2015, 5:14:17 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >> Daniel, >> >> I think we are done with the IP clearance process at this point, >> the requ