Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-09-01 Thread Anthony Baker
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15001 . Anthony > On Aug 22, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > >> On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-22 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
+1 On 8/22/17 1:48 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: +1 to migrate :) On 8/22/17 10:43, Anthony Baker wrote: On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: Hi! it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being able to click Merge this PR b

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-22 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
+1 to migrate :) On 8/22/17 10:43, Anthony Baker wrote: On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: Hi! it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite some time. This basicall

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-22 Thread Ernest Burghardt
+1 On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Joey McAllister wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:28 AM Ken Howe wrote: > > > +1 Yes, let’s make the move > > > > > On Aug 22, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Nabarun Nag wrote: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > > >

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-22 Thread Joey McAllister
+1 On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:28 AM Ken Howe wrote: > +1 Yes, let’s make the move > > > On Aug 22, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Nabarun Nag wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > > > >> +1 to move all our repos to gitbox > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:08 AM,

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-22 Thread Ken Howe
+1 Yes, let’s make the move > On Aug 22, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Nabarun Nag wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > >> +1 to move all our repos to gitbox >> >> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Jacob Barrett >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-22 Thread Nabarun Nag
+1 On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > +1 to move all our repos to gitbox > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Jacob Barrett > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Aug 22, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Jared Stewart > wrote: > > > > > > +1 for moving the other repos t

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-22 Thread Kirk Lund
+1 to move all our repos to gitbox On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Jacob Barrett wrote: > +1 > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 22, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Jared Stewart wrote: > > > > +1 for moving the other repos to Gitbox > > > > On Aug 22, 2017 10:43 AM, "Anthony Baker" wrote: > > > > > >>

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-22 Thread Jacob Barrett
+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 22, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Jared Stewart wrote: > > +1 for moving the other repos to Gitbox > > On Aug 22, 2017 10:43 AM, "Anthony Baker" wrote: > > >> On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> it has just come to my attention that Gi

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-22 Thread Dan Smith
+1 - Let's do it! -Dan On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Dave Barnes wrote: > +1 > I'm interested to see how it works for geode-site, which has a sorta quirky > build/branch structure. > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Jared Stewart > wrote: > > > +1 for moving the other repos to Gitbox >

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-22 Thread Dave Barnes
+1 I'm interested to see how it works for geode-site, which has a sorta quirky build/branch structure. On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Jared Stewart wrote: > +1 for moving the other repos to Gitbox > > On Aug 22, 2017 10:43 AM, "Anthony Baker" wrote: > > > > On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-22 Thread Jared Stewart
+1 for moving the other repos to Gitbox On Aug 22, 2017 10:43 AM, "Anthony Baker" wrote: > On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF > has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being > able to click Merge this PR butt

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-22 Thread Anthony Baker
> On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF > has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being > able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite > some time. > > This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-14 Thread Jacob Barrett
Awesome! Thanks! On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:27 PM Mark Bretl wrote: > Ticket created, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14876 > > Lets see where it goes... > > --Mark > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Jacob Barrett > wrote: > > > Mark, if you want the experience for the next repo yo

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-14 Thread Mark Bretl
Ticket created, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14876 Lets see where it goes... --Mark On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Jacob Barrett wrote: > Mark, if you want the experience for the next repo you should do it. > Thanks! > > -Jake > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 14, 2017, a

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-14 Thread Jacob Barrett
Mark, if you want the experience for the next repo you should do it. Thanks! -Jake Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 14, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Ernest Burghardt wrote: > > Mark, Go ahead and file it and geode-native will be the canaries... > > Thanks, > Ernie > >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Mar

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-14 Thread Ernest Burghardt
Mark, Go ahead and file it and geode-native will be the canaries... Thanks, Ernie On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Mark Bretl wrote: > Since we have people wanting this and need a small experiment group to > blaze the trail for us, I think the geode-native would be a good choice > since it has

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-14 Thread Mark Bretl
Since we have people wanting this and need a small experiment group to blaze the trail for us, I think the geode-native would be a good choice since it has active PRs and commits. Looks like the process to migrate from Git@ASF to GitHub is to create an INFRA ticket with type 'Gitbox Request'. Jake

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-14 Thread Jacob Barrett
Well, I am not seeing any -1 votes for this switch. Let's make the change. Any takers for following up with Inra to make this go? On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:49 PM Jacob Barrett wrote: > +1 for Gitbox > > This will greatly simplify the workflow committers go through with pull > requests from the c

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-11 Thread Jacob Barrett
The geode-native synch from ASF to GitHub is stuck again and while we are waiting for Infra to make the fix it occurred to me it might be more productive to have them just move us to GitBox. We have another big commit coming that will likely break the commit again. Does anyone object to geode-nativ

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-11 Thread Ernest Burghardt
+1 On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Nabarun Nag wrote: > +1 > > will this allow us to choose reviewers while creating PRs on github now? > > Regards > Nabarun > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:19 PM Udo Kohlmeyer > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On 8/9/17 12:56, Anthony Baker wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > >

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-09 Thread Nabarun Nag
+1 will this allow us to choose reviewers while creating PRs on github now? Regards Nabarun On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:19 PM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > +1 > > > On 8/9/17 12:56, Anthony Baker wrote: > > +1 > > > >> On Aug 8, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Mark Bretl wrote: > >> > >> +1 for Gitbox > >> > >> I h

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-09 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
+1 On 8/9/17 12:56, Anthony Baker wrote: +1 On Aug 8, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Mark Bretl wrote: +1 for Gitbox I have been watching threads on INFRA list and been waiting to see when a good time would be to introduce the idea to the community. The Gitbox project has been going since the end of 2

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-09 Thread Anthony Baker
+1 > On Aug 8, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Mark Bretl wrote: > > +1 for Gitbox > > I have been watching threads on INFRA list and been waiting to see when a > good time would be to introduce the idea to the community. The Gitbox > project has been going since the end of 2016 and looks as though it might

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-08 Thread Mark Bretl
+1 for Gitbox I have been watching threads on INFRA list and been waiting to see when a good time would be to introduce the idea to the community. The Gitbox project has been going since the end of 2016 and looks as though it might be ready now as INFRA has begun moving some of their repositories

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-08 Thread Dan Smith
I'm in favor of switching to gitbox. We're already getting pretty much all contributions from non-committers coming in as pull requests so we might as well make it easier for us to manage things in github. -Dan On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > One thing that's given me trouble

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-08 Thread Kirk Lund
One thing that's given me trouble is that the mirroring of ASF git (for Apache Geode) to github can have a lengthy delay. In other words, after I commit to ASF git, it's not uncommon for my commit to not show up in the GitHub mirror right away and I've seen this delay take an hour. On Mon, Aug 7,

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-07 Thread Hong
Good to know!! The problem for Github issues is that the id is not continuous(the id space is shared with Github's issues and pull requests) which is not a good design IMO. Hong 2017-08-08 10:01 GMT+08:00 Lei Chang : > cool. this will simplify the commit workflow a lot. > > And if we can use git

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-07 Thread Lei Chang
cool. this will simplify the commit workflow a lot. And if we can use github issues instead of apache JIRA, that will be more convenient. Cheers Lei On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF > has been enabling full

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-07 Thread Jacob Barrett
+1 for Gitbox This will greatly simplify the workflow committers go through with pull requests from the community. It will also allow us to close out pulls that go dark. On our local repos we would really have no need to ever include the apache repo so it reduces the number of remotes we need t

Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

2017-08-07 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Hi! it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite some time. This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently have: https://gitbo