s are used by which other
>>>>>>> projects? Off the top of my head….
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Specs …. who uses G’s and who has their own?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Components…. I think there are several users of the tran
On March 8, 2017 at 10:44:45 AM, Mark Struberg (strub...@yahoo.de) wrote:
Alan, I understand that you don't want to put much more energy into this
project. That is totally understandable and fine.
But while you are PMC chair you still cannot declare that the project is dead
as long as there are
Heh, are you saying it would be cool with you if I look into it?
:-P
--jason
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 2:04 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Anyone want to look into setting this up? If not I can look into it further
when I've got some
Anyone want to look into setting this up? If not I can look into it further
when I've got some free time.
--jason
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jun 13, 2012, at 11:25 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Jason Dillon jdil
Is this site sync stuff still in use?
--jason
Forwarded message:
From: Cron Daemon jdil...@apache.org
To: jdil...@apache.org
Date: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 2:05:06 PM
Subject: Cron lt;jdillon@minotaurgt; /home/jdillon/ws/site/bin/sync
svn: E155036: Please see the 'svn upgrade' command
Its been a long time since I fired up the server, but I just did (to look at
the keystore muck) and WOW. 3.0 looks really nice... from the web-console at
least. I still have issue with the text-console you are using, but eh
whatever ;-)
Nice work folks!
--jason
Installing rngd/rng-tools also can help fix these sorts of problems.
--jason
On Jul 14, 2011, at 7:19 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
From time to time I encounter a problem starting a Geronimo server on a Linux
system (I've always seen it on Ubuntu -- but the problem could exist on other
Come on just use javaee, and be done with it.
--jason
On Jan 29, 2010, at 9:22 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
You cannot use JEE to refer to Java EE. We had several instances of the
JEE usage on our OpenJPA website/docs and were politely reminded of
the correct naming by one of our PMC members
On Nov 4, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Geronimo 2.x has its own shell which
bases on gshell
uses groovy to define commands.(I don't kown why but I don't like
this)
BTW, I only used Groovy for the launching commands because of the nice
integration with Ant... and because of the desire
Me too :-) I guess that is why I put that in there, just never
updated projects to use it.
--jason
On Jul 16, 2009, at 1:08 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 15, 2009, at 10:46 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
I noticed there's a maven resource best practice defined in genesis-
.
FAQ
Browse SpaceAdd Page
View
Edit
Attachments (0)
Info
Added by Jason Dillon, last edited by Jason Dillon on Jun 22, 2006
(view change)
Labels: (None) EDIT
The Knowledge Base was intended to be the home for FAQ-ish thingys.
--jason
On Jul 7, 2009, at 12:04 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Obviously, there are really some FAQ in the mailing list such as
1, Lib conflict including myface, spring
2, Log4j
3, JPA JTA/Non-JTA DS requirement.
4, web-service
On Jul 2, 2009, at 11:56 PM, gno...@apache.org wrote:
eventDispatcher.blueprintEvent(new
BlueprintEvent(BlueprintEvent.DESTROYED,
getBundleContext().getBundle(), getExtenderBundle()));
-LOGGER.debug(Module container destroyed: +
this.bundleContext);
+
Is it time to make framework its own sub-project? Seems like it would
reduce some complexity if the bits needed to `mvn -Dstage=bootstrap
install` where separate... leaving server to pull in its outputs,
build plugins and then assemble. Eventually plugins can be split off.
But right now
)
Components: Commands - SSH
Reporter: Jason Dillon
Assignee: Jason Dillon
Fix For: 1.0-alpha-3
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon closed GSHELL-163.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Upgrade to org.apache.sshd 0.1.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon updated GERONIMO-4709:
---
Summary: start-server's -j flag does not work (was: start-servers' -j flag
does not work
)
Components: commands
Affects Versions: 2.1.4
Reporter: Jason Dillon
Assignee: Jason Dillon
Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2
Problem is that node.setAttribute(String, String) won't coerce 2nd param of
type java.io.File to string.
--
This message is automatically
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-4709.
--
Resolution: Fixed
start-server's -j flag does not work
I guess no one ever tested the start-server -j flag, cause its been
broke for a long time. Should work now though.
--jason
On Jun 24, 2009, at 7:56 PM, jdil...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jdillon
Date: Wed Jun 24 12:56:16 2009
New Revision: 788006
URL:
It would be great to get rid of the local repo in svn. I forget, but
I think jtidy is needed by the muck that generates html reports for
whatever reason.
Would be good to get the dwr and dojo stuff published. BTW, we are
using some really old versions of dojo, any chance on updating
I spent a lot of hours with genesis 1.x looking through all the poms
for the setting that was causing behavior I was wondering about to
want to eliminate every bit of unnecessary complexity I could.
In the event we come up with a flava that doesn't want to inherit
from default-flava we can
Why was this module change made? If I recall I setup genesis-flava
and genesis-default-flava (as a child of the previous) on purpose.
Why was this changed?
--jason
On Jun 22, 2009, at 11:03 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 22, 2009, at 6:58 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why was this module change made? If I recall I setup genesis-flava
and genesis-default-flava (as a child of the previous) on purpose.
Why was this changed?
Because I couldn't see the purpose
, at 4:31 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 1:36 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why do the assemblies in the repository have dependencies? I
realize that they are probably there to facilitate the build, but
shouldn't they all be marked as scopeprovided/scope?
The reason I think
Jencks wrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 1:36 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why do the assemblies in the repository have dependencies? I
realize that they are probably there to facilitate the build, but
shouldn't they all be marked as scopeprovided/scope?
The reason I think they should be, is that when
hrm... weird... will try to clean some of my repo and build again.
--jason
On Jun 18, 2009, at 8:39 PM, Ivan wrote:
It is in http://repository.apache.org/snapshots. But this site is in
the root pom file, it should not have problem in downloading this
module.
Ivan
2009/6/18 Jason Dillon
Why do the assemblies in the repository have dependencies? I realize
that they are probably there to facilitate the build, but shouldn't
they all be marked as scopeprovided/scope?
The reason I think they should be, is that when a user wants to use
the geronimo-maven-plugin with the
Okay, I will give it a shot on trunk first, if that works I will try
on branches/2.1.
--jason
On Jun 18, 2009, at 4:31 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 1:36 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why do the assemblies in the repository have dependencies? I
realize that they are probably
PM, Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com
wrote:
Was using the 2.1.4+tomcat release and found this very odd:
Also, why do we say Apache Tomcat/... instead of Geronimo+Tomcat/
2.1.4?
Totally agree with you that Geronimo+Tomcat/2.1.4 is more
appropriate here.
--jason
--
Shawn
PM, Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com
wrote:
Why do we not show the error of a deployment, or in this case app
start in the console:
Also, shouldn't the *not* part be hi-lighted bold+red or something?
It does not look all that dissimilar to a successful deploy+start,
so it might be easily
/16 Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com
Aren't we trying to do something a little bit more intelligent about
picking a context for deployed wars w/o a plan.xml?
Seems like all of these default/... wars want to mount under /
WebApp_ID... forcing me to make a plan for them, just to set
I have to retract this with some shame... *blush*
I didn't realize that all of the silly webapps I was testing had their
web-app id=WebApp_ID ...
OMG.
--jason
On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:29 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Even a random context would be better than always using /
WebApp_ID... but I
On Jun 16, 2009, at 2:40 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 16, 2009, at 12:08 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I have to retract this with some shame... *blush*
I didn't realize that all of the silly webapps I was testing had
their web-app id=WebApp_ID ...
It's news to me that tomcat does
when it begins, this should
be improved, maybe we could use the war file's name as the default
context.
2009/6/16 Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com
Aren't we trying to do something a little bit more intelligent about
picking a context for deployed wars w/o a plan.xml?
Seems like all
Why is apache.snapshots old and apache.people.snapshots is new?
--jason
On Jun 16, 2009, at 4:17 PM, xuhaih...@apache.org wrote:
Author: xuhaihong
Date: Tue Jun 16 09:17:37 2009
New Revision: 785118
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=785118view=rev
Log:
Update the id of old snapshot site
Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com
Why is apache.snapshots old and apache.people.snapshots is new?
--jason
On Jun 16, 2009, at 4:17 PM, xuhaih...@apache.org wrote:
Author: xuhaihong
Date: Tue Jun 16 09:17:37 2009
New Revision: 785118
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=785118view=rev
Log:
Update
of this repository is also proxied and aggregated
at the new url.
/snip
So it makes sense to use it and not add another repository into the mix.
--jason
On Jun 16, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why is server/trunk not using the new snapshots repository?
--jason
On Jun 16, 2009, at 4:47 PM, Ivan
Kay :-)
--jason
On Jun 16, 2009, at 8:31 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
It was in a rush to get the admin console security vulnerabilities
fixed and everyone had a chance to review and test the changes that
went in before 2.1.4 was released :-)
-Donald
Jason Dillon wrote:
Okay, thx.
/me
Why do we not show the error of a deployment, or in this case app
start in the console:
inline: Geronimo Console-1.jpg
Also, shouldn't the *not* part be hi-lighted bold+red or something?
It does not look all that dissimilar to a successful deploy+start, so
it might be easily missed.
I think it was me...
--jason
On Jun 7, 2009, at 10:47 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Apparently we're supposed to upgrade our nabble stuff...
http://www.nabble.com/help/Answer.jtp?id=42skin=134
which you get to by clicking the are you the owner of this project
warning link from e.g.
Um, what kinda javadoc is this.
From what I have seen stuff like this tends to stay, asis... so if
you take the effort to check something like this in, why not add real
docs?
--jason
On Apr 23, 2009, at 2:30 AM, gno...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gnodet
Date: Wed Apr 22 19:30:51 2009
New
On Apr 20, 2009, at 12:58 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Here are a few points i'd like to discuss about the blueprint
implementation:
* logging api: should be use JUL, commons-logging, slf4j ?
slf4j I hope... :-)
--jason
On Mar 12, 2009, at 1:26 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I believe that xbean-spring is still unnecessary noisy when
compared to something like the Spring Bean Builder (http://www.grails.org/Spring+Bean+Builder
).
That looks nice, but is there any syntax validation possible? I'm
pretty much
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12677271#action_12677271
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-4557:
This is not a GShell issue... its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon reassigned GERONIMO-4557:
--
Assignee: (was: Jason Dillon)
geronimo/stop-server -p 3099 can't shutdown
On Feb 18, 2009, at 7:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Feb 17, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Sounds worth the time to try it out.
Two requests:
1) If this works, we publish the framework assembly instead of the
two minimal assemblies to the Download page for 2.2, as this would
allow
+1
--jason
On Feb 18, 2009, at 2:17 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Last week I noted that there's an apache nexus installation that we
can use for staging and deployment... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896
They suggest a vote on this, so here goes.
Lets ask sonatype/infra to
On Feb 18, 2009, at 9:54 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 17, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
None of those files are included in a release.
They're part of the source release, whether or not they're in the
binary distribution is irrelevant...
The binary files (build, extract, etc
None of those files are included in a release.
--jason
On Feb 17, 2009, at 10:47 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I ran rat against the tag and found the following files missing the
Apache license header. These are probably alright because I don't
see them included in any of the distribution
+1
--jason
On Feb 14, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of gshell 1.0-alpha2.
The staging repo is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/gshell-1.0-alpha2
The svn tag is:
What happened?
--jason
On Feb 13, 2009, at 9:26 PM, gno...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gnodet
Date: Fri Feb 13 14:26:06 2009
New Revision: 744122
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=744122view=rev
Log:
Rollback release
Removed:
geronimo/gshell/tags/gshell-1.0-alpha-2/
k
--jason
On Feb 13, 2009, at 10:01 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I will commit a patch that is kinda blocking on windows. It's
minimal, but has been raised while i was doing the release. So I will
commit the patch and restart the release asap.
2009/2/13 Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12673267#action_12673267
]
Jason Dillon commented on GSHELL-159:
-
This should have been fixed by the gshell
Hrm, this should have been fixed by the gshell-terminal adapters...
and why that if () was removed.
--jason
On Feb 13, 2009, at 10:21 PM, gno...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gnodet
Date: Fri Feb 13 15:21:56 2009
New Revision: 744143
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=744143view=rev
Log:
Yay! Can you make them activate with -Dit plz?
--jason
On Feb 12, 2009, at 5:41 AM, David Jencks wrote:
While I much prefer running the testsuite integration tests by
default I think it is no longer a reasonable strategy.
Due to the bootstrap requirements the default modules have to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12671563#action_12671563
]
Jason Dillon commented on GSHELL-157:
-
Ya, a side effect of leaning on VFS to handle
can't found anymore.
I will try to upgrade to 3.0-alpha-1 and see what it gives.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 04:47, Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com wrote:
Yes, go ahead.
--jason
On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month.
Do
-project-2.1.0-r72 which I can't found anymore.
I will try to upgrade to 3.0-alpha-1 and see what it gives.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 04:47, Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com
wrote:
Yes, go ahead.
--jason
On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
We are planning a release
Yes, go ahead.
--jason
On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month.
Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ?
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com
wrote:
Well, I think its mostly Genesis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12668766#action_12668766
]
Jason Dillon commented on GSHELL-156:
-
I'm tempted to leave it in there just to annoy
On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:07 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
What does git have that svn doesn't which makes you so interested in
the subject?
IIUC, the major advantages of GIT are:
* offline commits - you can commit changes, even if online.
* cheap branching - this would make it much simpler for
On Jan 28, 2009, at 1:47 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
There are some usages of GIT that would not fit well into an
Apache project. For instance, I would not want to see project
members using GIT as a private means of sharing code updates.
Ultimately, code needs to get into our svn repo -- that's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon reopened GERONIMO-4170:
Assignee: Jason Dillon (was: Donald Woods)
Upgrade Selenium version for Firefox 3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-4170.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.4)
Upgraded to selenium-maven-plugin
:
On Jan 16, 2009, at 2:04 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
... looks like it works fine with FF3. I'm gonna see how well it works in
server/trunk and then will publish a release if it works.
Excellent. Thanks Jason.
--kevan
Any comments on using the nexus install on the zone for the custom
artifacts we need for our builds? I'd like to make this live.
--jason
The process of adding artifacts is adding new bits to:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/repository/trunk/
The nexus simply proxies/caches from this URL.
--jason
On Jan 16, 2009, at 7:56 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jan 16, 2009, at 6:35 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Any comments
File a JIRA, explaining what it does that you don't like and what you
would prefer to see it do.
--jason
On Jan 15, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Jack Cai wrote:
I found a relevant GShell command called geronimo/wait-for-server
that might do the job. The command will check whether all relevent
... looks like it works fine with FF3. I'm gonna see how well it
works in server/trunk and then will publish a release if it works.
--jason
of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future.
What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ?
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon jason.dil...@gmail.com
wrote:
The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The
major
changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make
FYI, you should be able to just use iterModel.name, or if you want
something like:
def zipName = ${targetDir}/logs/${iterModel.name}.zip
--jason
On Jan 9, 2009, at 8:38 AM, jawar...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jawarner
Date: Thu Jan 8 17:38:03 2009
New Revision: 732905
URL:
Why aren't these links? Its pointless IMO to add items to nav pages
which are not links of some sort.
--jason
On Jan 6, 2009, at 10:38 PM, conflue...@apache.org wrote:
Page Edited : GMOxSITE : SideNav Subprojects
SideNav Subprojects has been edited by Donald Woods (Jan 06, 2009).
(View
Um, that is way to big for me to answer here. Suggest you watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
--jason
On Dec 27, 2008, at 3:48 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com
wrote:
I've been doing some experimenting using
On Dec 18, 2008, at 1:12 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Seems that as a community we should keep our project name as part
of all groupIds we generate...
If no one else feels that way, then fine, I will not call for a
vote, but my opinion stands... :-)
Just curious what you think about xbean and
/gshell/gshell-api/1.0-alpha-2-SNAPSHOT/
seems to be over a week old.
Regards,
Gert
Jason Dillon wrote:
Thx :-)
--jason
On Dec 17, 2008, at 4:31 PM, gno...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gnodet
Date: Wed Dec 17 01:31:44 2008
New Revision: 727321
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev
-repository/org/apache/geronimo/gshell/gshell-api/1.0-alpha-2-SNAPSHOT/
seems to be over a week old.
Regards,
Gert
Jason Dillon wrote:
Thx :-)
--jason
On Dec 17, 2008, at 4:31 PM, gno...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gnodet
Date: Wed Dec 17 01:31:44 2008
New Revision: 727321
URL: http
. xbean on the other hand is
not geronimo specific directly under o.a.
IMO GShell is not geronimo-specific, closer in nature to xbean than to
specs or components.
So for me the change of packages makes a lot of sense.
--jason
-Donald
Jason Dillon wrote:
No, it just seems that subprojects
. That and there has been some discussion on the infra list
about an ASF git repo, hopefully that will be per TLP, but who knows.
--jason
On Dec 6, 2008, at 1:22 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Dec 4, 2008, at 9:13 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Has anyone figured out a way to use git, hg, or bzr for G
Thx :-)
--jason
On Dec 17, 2008, at 4:31 PM, gno...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gnodet
Date: Wed Dec 17 01:31:44 2008
New Revision: 727321
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=727321view=rev
Log:
GSHELL-154: Create interfaces to represent links and aliases
Added:
Maven too.
-Jack
2008/12/16 Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
OS+Java 6+FF3+Server+Samples+Eclipse+GEP would be ideal for
developers
-Donald
Jason Dillon wrote:
Any idea why kinda of images you'd like to see? I'm gonna try and
craft a simple, base-os+Geronimo image to test out. But I
Sure. I just but that issue in there so I don't forget :-)
--jason
On Dec 16, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
Seems like something we should vote on, given our specs, samples,
components and plugin subprojects all use org.apache.geronimo.*
-Donald
Jason Dillon
I've been playing around with VMWare, trying to optimize my
virtualization configuration, and it occurred to me that folks who are
savvy to the virtualization concept might benefit from having a linux
+openjdk+geronimo appliance ready to play with perhaps another which
is ready for
On Dec 15, 2008, at 3:24 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I think this is a great idea. I doubt we can host it at apache.
unless we do something like bsd + harmony (not even sure if that is
likely to work)
Thats what I've been realizing... But can we link to it/documented it
from apache?
, 2008, at 3:24 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I think this is a great idea. I doubt we can host it at apache.
unless we do something like bsd + harmony (not even sure if that is
likely to work)
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 15, 2008, at 12:01 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I've been playing around
and not a Geronimo subproject?
-Donald
Jason Dillon (JIRA) wrote:
Repackage org.apache.geronimo.gshell.* - org.apache.gshell.*
-
Key: GSHELL-151
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-151
: public (Regular issues)
Components: Support - Artifact + Mercury
Reporter: Jason Dillon
Assignee: Jason Dillon
Fix For: 1.0-alpha-3
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: Build
Reporter: Jason Dillon
Assignee: Jason Dillon
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 1.0-beta-1
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add
Why are we building Simple Monitoring Console Server assemblies? Do
we ship these? Why?
--jason
And why on earth does the build run by default selenium-based
integration tests? Even when -Pno-it is configured?
--jason
On Dec 14, 2008, at 6:51 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why are we building Simple Monitoring Console Server assemblies?
Do we ship these? Why?
--jason
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: Build
Reporter: Jason Dillon
Assignee: Jason Dillon
Fix For: 1.0-alpha-3
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
)
Components: Build
Reporter: Jason Dillon
Assignee: Jason Dillon
Fix For: 1.0-alpha-3
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon updated GSHELL-152:
Component/s: (was: Build)
Maven Plugin
Add gshell-maven-plugin to allow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon closed GSHELL-153.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0-alpha-3)
1.0-alpha-2
Here:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-resources-plugin/resources-mojo.html#encoding
And here is a more general document about it:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/POM+Element+for+Source+File+Encoding
--jason
On Dec 12, 2008, at 9:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
On Dec 5, 2008, at 3:43 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Dec 4, 2008, at 5:55 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Hi I just realized (or rather remembered) that the G repository
doesn't include any poms. This presents a little bit of a problem
for integrating the latest GShell which uses Maven2 poms
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon closed GSHELL-149.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0-alpha-3)
1.0-alpha-2
Get
Why do we need 2 sets of activemq modules? If the new ones work, then
lets just use them.
--jason
On Dec 9, 2008, at 9:26 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
One of 2 good questions...
The ${activemqString} was put in there by Jencks, so I just kept
using it, but it should probably be removed.
Hey, you really should not rely on system environment variables here,
as that kinda defeats the purpose of using the svn-based controllers
for all configuration.
I'd recommend you revert this and setup defaults in the controllers.
--jason
On Dec 10, 2008, at 1:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Commons-logging should not be included at all, we are using the slf4j
adapters.
--jason
On Dec 10, 2008, at 2:18 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
We also have multiple versions of some depends getting pulled into
the assemblies right now, that needs to get fixed:
commons-logging - 1.0.3 and
1 - 100 of 3782 matches
Mail list logo
