[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-423?page=all ]
Bruce Snyder closed SM-423:
---
Change the AutoDeploymentService.updateExternal(String,boolean) to return an
ArchiveEntry
WS-Notification broker only creates subscriptions for endpoints in SM, should
be possible for endpoints outside SM
--
Key: SM-424
URL:
On 5/2/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd certainly support moving the transports out of the Geronimo server
SVN tree and into a separate repos/asf/geronimo/mail-transports tree
or something. That way they could be independently versioned along
with the spec JARs and you wouldn't
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1949?page=all ]
John Sisson closed GERONIMO-1949:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Some Tomcat Jetty web app deployment errors do not identify web app module
name associated with the error
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1970?page=all ]
John Sisson closed GERONIMO-1970:
-
Resolution: Fixed
During deployment, ModuleBuilders don't log an error if call to
DeploymentUtil.recursiveDelete(dir) does not work
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1616?page=all ]
David Jencks reopened GERONIMO-1616:
Correct solution for interoperability is to append @target during encode and
remove it again during decode. Fixed in 1.1 branch in openejb rev
Hello!
Now version of HOWL in
Geronimo is 0.1.11. What do you think about its replacing with new one 1.0.0?
Some problems are fixed
in new HOWL version. One of them is of importance for correct Geronimo startup:
class org.objectweb.howl.log.BlockLogBuffer
from
Most of the documentation was uploaded into a JIRA and granted ASF license long time ago. I say most
because the last updates have not been yet uploaded. Once we have cwiki.apache.org in production the
license should no longer be an issue.
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Hernan Cunico
javamail Session class using wrong classloader search sequence for resolving
providers.
---
Key: GERONIMO-1973
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1973
Project: Geronimo
On 5/3/06, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the documentation was uploaded into a JIRA and granted ASF license long
time ago. I say most
because the last updates have not been yet uploaded. Once we have
cwiki.apache.org in production the
license should no longer be an issue.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1973?page=all ]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-1973:
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 399294
geronimo-spec-javamail/src/main/java/javax/mail/Session.java
javamail Session class using wrong
All
The Geronimo Team is happy to provide you with a stable build of Geronimo 1.1 for your review,
testing and comments. This is not the final release of Geronimo 1.1 but is an excellent
representation of what will be available in 1.1. I will follow this note up with a set of
Preliminary
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1789?page=comments#action_12377593
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1789:
I dont think we want to apply individual change to trunk at this point. Let's
wrap up 1.1 and then decide how we want to
I'd like to kick off a thread about the monitoring of clustered
deployments...
There is a section in the 1,000ft Clustering Overview
(http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Clustering),
but little content, due to the fact that there has been little
discussion about
Distributed JMX sounds like a simple way to monitor a cluster of any
Java stuff. Details on using clustered JMX over JMS here...
http://lingo.codehaus.org/JMX+over+JMS
which lets you monitor the cluster in a single MBeanServer
On 5/3/06, Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to
No good deed goes unpunished...the URLs below were malformed. Please use these
instead. Apologies.
Tomcat Versions
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/20060502/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1-20060502.tar.gz
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/20060502/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1-20060502.zip
Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-501?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-501:
---
Resolution: Fixed
I created the
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/systest/weblogic-test
modules to test MDB and outbund jms
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-629?page=comments#action_36136 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-629:
---
Adiran,
Is this still broken?
test case SslTransportBrokerTest not working
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-629?page=comments#action_36138 ]
james strachan commented on AMQ-629:
It certainly is on the m2 build on OS X
test case SslTransportBrokerTest not working
Hi folks,
I think that the 4.0 release has been cooking long enough and we
should do a 4.0 final release before Java 1. Since that last RC3
build, numerous small bugs and memory leaks have been tightened up.
Also LICENSE files for the 3rd party dependencies have been added to
the
Listing WARs portlet broken after a redeploy using CLI
--
Key: GERONIMO-1974
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1974
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components:
I have been testing the redeploy functionality using CLI and came
across the following issues/questions/concerns. Basically, I have been
redeploying the same war but bumping the version # in the plan.
1) After a redeploy is done by CLI, the portelt in the console that
displays the list is
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1974?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1974:
-
Attachment: redeploy-stacktrace.txt
Listing WARs portlet broken after a redeploy using CLI
Hi Chris,
we are currently ironing out all remaining issues so we can feel
comfortable calling for a vote for a GA release of ActiveMQ very
soon. We want to actively start discussing the changes required on
the dev list - but want to get 4.0 settled first. So if you could
bear with us
James Strachan wrote:
Distributed JMX sounds like a simple way to monitor a cluster of any
Java stuff. Details on using clustered JMX over JMS here...
http://lingo.codehaus.org/JMX+over+JMS
which lets you monitor the cluster in a single MBeanServer
cool - sounds like exactly the sort of
BTW I'm not necessarily saying that the Lingo JMX connector is *the* solution, just *a* solution - but I think the general approach of using distributed JMX connectors seems like a good, standards based approach to monitoring and controlling clusters of POJOs. Then folks can choose the JMX
Anyone know of any Geronimo BOFs at JavaOne this year? If not, any
interest on getting one together?
I haven't seen or heard of any from our community here. I think it
would be great to get everyone together and do some form of BOF to
update everyone of where we are at and where we are going.
That would be great. I don't know of one. It would be good to get the committers (and other
community members) together and hammer out some of the details on the community goals. Aaron's
document is a great starting point.
Matt
Jeff Genender wrote:
Anyone know of any Geronimo BOFs at
I think that would be great. I've love to spend some time there doing
an introduction to plugins. But don't we need Sun to bless any BOF
for JavaOne?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 5/3/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know of any Geronimo BOFs at JavaOne this year? If not, any
Yes...I have some connections I can try to ping...
Great idea for a topic though!
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I think that would be great. I've love to spend some time there doing
an introduction to plugins. But don't we need Sun to bless any BOF
for JavaOne?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 5/3/06, Jeff
security builder should trim everything
---
Key: GERONIMO-1975
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1975
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Versions: 1.1
its a neat solution, I like it.
one would still need to build the aggregate view, so that summaries
etc can be reported on,
otherwise you only view a server at a time, which can be achieved by
just connecting to the server itself.
by aggregate I mean the sum of the nodes in the cluster, for
No, I wasn't suggesting that updating the Wiki hoses up the copyright. You have a much better
understanding of copyrights and ownership than I do; you've written a book and I can barely read.
What I was referring to was my perceived distinction between project documentation and supporting
Jeff Genender wrote:
Anyone know of any Geronimo BOFs at JavaOne this year? If not, any
interest on getting one together?
Yes - I asked for a slot late and I think we have it. More as I know it.
geir
I haven't seen or heard of any from our community here. I think it
would be great to
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 5/3/06, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the documentation was uploaded into a JIRA and granted ASF
license long time ago. I say most
because the last updates have not been yet uploaded. Once we have
cwiki.apache.org in production the
license should no
Yay! Thanks Geir!!
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Anyone know of any Geronimo BOFs at JavaOne this year? If not, any
interest on getting one together?
Yes - I asked for a slot late and I think we have it. More as I know it.
geir
I haven't seen or heard of any
0.1.11 to 1.0.0 appears like a major jump... What else has changed?
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Udovichenko, Nellya [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 14:14:53
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: New HOWL version in Geronimo
Hello!
Now version of HOWL in Geronimo is
Hi All,
I remember discussing about the alternative commands for starting and stopping the server but I
can't find that note.
Did we ever came up with an official position as of what would be the preferred commands to start
and stop the server? I also believe we even mentioned about adding a
Change Welcome Application for G1.1
---
Key: GERONIMO-1976
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1976
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: usability
Versions: 1.1
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1976?page=all ]
Dave Colasurdo updated GERONIMO-1976:
-
Attachment: welcome-app.patch
Change Welcome Application for G1.1
---
Key: GERONIMO-1976
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1976?page=comments#action_12377630
]
Dave Colasurdo commented on GERONIMO-1976:
--
BTW, the patch should get applied to /applications/welcome/src/webapp/
Thanks
Change Welcome Application for G1.1
Cool.
Can you post a diff of what you had to change to get G to build and
start with different verion number. Trying to update the
publish_build.sh script. Got the standard plugins and etc/
project.properties stuff, but it seems i'm missing something still.
-David
On May 3, 2006, at
On May 2, 2006, at 12:27 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~hcunico/site/
I think these proposed changes will facilitate access to the
documentation, increase it's visibility and hopefully we will see
more volunteers to continue developing the docs.
Thoughts, comments,
Remove corba spec javamail spec from rmi-naming
-
Key: GERONIMO-1977
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1977
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1977?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1977:
---
Attachment: 1977_RemoveDeps.patch
patch was created on windows xp from geronimo root directory.
Remove corba spec javamail spec from rmi-naming
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1977?page=all ]
Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-1977:
--
Assign To: David Jencks (was: Joe Bohn)
Remove corba spec javamail spec from rmi-naming
-
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1946?page=all ]
Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-1946:
--
Assign To: Joe Bohn (was: Dain Sundstrom)
SingleFileHotDeploy does not correctly resolve the configuration ID.
Great, if you can provide with some content for XBean and GBuild I will create the respective
directories and reorg accordingly.
devtools.html is currently at root level so I will move it to the existing devtools directory and
rename it as index.html.
I will go ahead an implement this
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1946?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1946:
---
Summary: SingleFileHotDeploy fixes for resolve, no force restart, empty
target, and messages (was: SingleFileHotDeploy does not correctly resolve the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1946?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1946:
---
Attachment: 1946_SFHDResolvePlus.patch
This patch includes changes for all of the items mentioned in the description.
Use this patch
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1946?page=all ]
Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-1946:
--
Assign To: Dain Sundstrom (was: Joe Bohn)
SingleFileHotDeploy fixes for resolve, no force restart, empty target, and
messages
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1961?page=all ]
Joe Bohn closed GERONIMO-1961:
--
Resolution: Duplicate
This issue and fix was integrated into GERONIMO-1946
SingleFileHotDeployer - Application is not started on server restart
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1962?page=all ]
Joe Bohn closed GERONIMO-1962:
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Assign To: Joe Bohn
This issue and resolution was integrated in to GERONIMO-1946
SingleFileHotDeployer: Messages on the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1961?page=all ]
Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-1961:
--
Assign To: Joe Bohn
SingleFileHotDeployer - Application is not started on server restart
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1848?page=all ]
Joe Bohn closed GERONIMO-1848:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Shared Library support via a GBean
--
Key: GERONIMO-1848
URL:
Hi Guys,
I couldn't compile the current solution file (in VS.NET 2005), it was missing some includes.
Here is the patch to get the project compiling.
Cheers,
Rob.
Index: activemq-dotnet.csproj
===
--- activemq-dotnet.csproj
On May 3, 2006, at 2:55 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Great, if you can provide with some content for XBean and GBuild I
will create the respective directories and reorg accordingly.
devtools.html is currently at root level so I will move it to the
existing devtools directory and rename it as
Hi,
Jeff, I do know that you are working hard on preparing the release of
G1.1; however, when you get more time, could you please try to expand a
little bit on this subject?
I am curious to see how the Session API has been implemented and how it
is leveraged to provide clustering
On 5/3/06, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will go ahead an implement this changes (including the proposal for the
documentation), will need
the XBean and GBuild info from you before though :)
It's great to see more participation in the documentation. However,
please revise the
On May 3, 2006, at 8:51 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
I'd like to kick off a thread about the monitoring of clustered
deployments...
There is a section in the 1,000ft Clustering Overview (http://
opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/
Clustering), but little content, due to
+1
David Blevins wrote:
On May 2, 2006, at 12:27 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~hcunico/site/
I think these proposed changes will facilitate access to the
documentation, increase it's visibility and hopefully we will see more
volunteers to continue developing the
little-G for Jetty
--
Key: GERONIMO-1978
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1978
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: general
Versions: 1.1
Environment: all
Reporter:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1978?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1978:
---
Attachment: 1978_littleG-jettty.patch
I created this patch on windows under the geronimo root directory.
Please note: I've had problems in the past where
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1978?page=all ]
Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-1978:
--
Assign To: Matt Hogstrom (was: Joe Bohn)
little-G for Jetty
--
Key: GERONIMO-1978
URL:
Hi Gianny,
Thanks for the ping. I would be happy to engage and walk through some
ideas, etc. But you hit the nail on the head...I am working hard on
trying to get us to J1 - so many hours in the day! ;-)
I am with you all the way on offering a more robust solution and am in
complete alignment
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1925?page=comments#action_12377686
]
Dain Sundstrom commented on GERONIMO-1925:
--
I just committed a new class loader that should eliminate the file locks
created by the class loader. To enable the
I added a new optional class loader to 1.1 which should fix our file
lock problem on Windows. To enable the class loader use the
following command line option:
-DXorg.apache.geronimo.NewClassLoader=true
If the class loader actually solves the problem, and passes the TCK
we can
Add custom class loader that does not leave open file locks
---
Key: GERONIMO-1979
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1979
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Security: public (Regular
Can we use this URL for JIRA:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO
instead of the version that is up there now:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10220
--jason
On 5/2/06, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
when we updated the web site we
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1925?page=comments#action_12377695
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-1925:
--
Dain has fixed this problem in G-1979
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1979). This issue may be closed.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1979?page=comments#action_12377698
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-1979:
--
Dain's comment in G-1925
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1925#action_12377686 )
I just committed a
Move Plugin Installer from rmi-naming to j2ee-system
Key: GERONIMO-1980
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1980
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Security: public (Regular issues)
Thar she blows
David Blevins wrote:
Cool.
Can you post a diff of what you had to change to get G to build and
start with different verion number. Trying to update the
publish_build.sh script. Got the standard plugins and
etc/project.properties stuff, but it seems i'm missing
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1900?page=comments#action_12377703
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1900:
I agree with Dave's analysis.
Also, I don't like the fact that the patch has a hardcoded port in the redirect
URL, or
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1887?page=all ]
Erin Mulder updated GERONIMO-1887:
--
Fix Version: 1.1
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
Remove unneeded jars from console WEB-INF/lib directories
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1683?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1683:
Resolution: Fixed
patch applied, thanks!
Web app context-root should trim whitespace
---
Do you have one of these for OpenEJB too? Is there anything to do
thre other than etc/project.properties?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 5/4/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thar she blows
David Blevins wrote:
Cool.
Can you post a diff of what you had to change to get G to build and
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-704?page=comments#action_36140 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-704:
---
The reason the singleton map was put in the System properties were chosen in
the first place is because it's guaranteed to be in the
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-704?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino reassigned AMQ-704:
-
Assign To: Hiram Chirino
ActiveIO compromises java.lang.System.properties
Key: AMQ-704
You're welcome to look at that. Can you list the issues you're going
to attempt to fix? There seems to be a lot of variation in what
people think the problems actually are.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 5/4/06, Rakesh Ranjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have not seen much activity in hot
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1769?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1769:
Resolution: Fixed
Console should create links for all sections including the current section
Thanks Aaron for the quick response.
Here are two issues with Geronimo-1.2-SNAPSHOT which need to be fixed :
1. When Geronimo starts, it try to deploy the modules in the hot
deployment directory even if that module is already deployed. Since
the application is already deployed, it throws an error
Please do any work in the 1.1 branch. Right now 1.2 is in a very
uncertain state. Though, I suspect the issues will be different in
1.1, so you may want to start by testing the same things there.
IIRC, the hot deployer does not yet check the timestamp of the
deployments in it its directory
Hi All,
I would like to work on the enhancement based on JDK 1.5.
Can any one please let me know about the current status of the same?
With Warm Regards,
Reghu
Geronimo 1.1 runs under JDK 1.5, but will not be J2EE certified on JDK
1.5. The CORBA features do not work in 1.5, but everything else
should. There is an issue if you serialize a QName under JDK 1.4 and
deserialize it until JDK 1.5, but that is not a Geronimo problem per
se -- and it shouldn't
I have seen the same problems with Geronimo-1.1-SNAPSHOT also. So i will create JIRA ID for these two issues and start working.
Rakesh RanjanOn 5/4/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please do any work in the 1.1 branch.Right now 1.2 is in a veryuncertain state.Though, I suspect the issues
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1231?page=all ]
Erin Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1231:
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Was unable to reproduce with:
Operating System: SuSE Linux 10
JVM: Sun 1.5.0_06
G Version: 1.1-SNAPSHOT
Web Connector has GBean=(container name) in AbstractName
Key: GERONIMO-1981
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1981
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1273?page=all ]
Erin Mulder updated GERONIMO-1273:
--
Attachment: 1273-jms-listener-add-dialog.patch
This patch changes the add dialog to show the protocol.
JMS Network Listener add dialogs should give
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1273?page=all ]
Erin Mulder updated GERONIMO-1273:
--
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
JMS Network Listener add dialogs should give some context information on the
protocol.
server try to deploy the modules in hot deployment directory again during
server startup
Key: GERONIMO-1982
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1982
Project: Geronimo
Why are the plugins using geronimoVersion in addition to the
standdard geronimo_version?
I remember seeing some of that usage in the past, though it seems to
have flourished.
-David
On May 3, 2006, at 9:28 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Thar she blows
David Blevins wrote:
Cool.
Can you
92 matches
Mail list logo
