Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XBean 4.13

+1 (non-binding) Thanks! regards, François Papon fpa...@apache.org Le 29/03/2019 à 12:45, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi guys, > > Here is the vote for xbean 4.13, it solves 3 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/XBEAN/versions/12344253 > > Here is the staging > repo:  >

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec api jar (take2)

+1 (non-binding) Thanks! regards, François Papon fpa...@apache.org Le 02/03/2019 à 01:50, Mark Struberg a écrit : > hi folks! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the JPA-2.2 api (take2). > I've updated all missing parts and did verify with the signets against > the official jar. > > Here

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-json_1.1 spec API jar version 1.2

+1 (non-binding) Thanks! regards, François Papon fpa...@apache.org Le 02/03/2019 à 23:06, Mark Struberg a écrit : > hi folks! > > I'd like to call a vote on releasing our jsonp-1.1 api jar in version 1.2. > This Release fixes > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6712 > which might

Re: [xbean] - OSGi module class

hy I didn't > push it. > > Let me take a look. > > Regards > JB > > On 11/03/2019 17:40, Francois Papon wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> When deploying a WAR included log4j-api-2.11.1.jar in Apache Karaf 4.2.3 >> with PaxWeb, I have a NPE. >> >> I t

[xbean] - OSGi module class

Hi guys, When deploying a WAR included log4j-api-2.11.1.jar in Apache Karaf 4.2.3 with PaxWeb, I have a NPE. I tried to debug XBeanFinder and I can see that the NPE is throw when a module-info.class is check. The version of XBean used is 4.12.0 and I tried on oracle-jdk1.8 and oracle-jdk-11. I

Re: [xbean] - OSGi module class

/github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le lun. 11 mars 2019 à 17:40, Francois Papon > mailto:francois.pa...@openobject.fr>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XBean 4.14

Hi, I can't see the issue attach to the release in the JIRA version link and the release note is empty : https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/XBEAN/versions/12345220 May be a bug in Jira? regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 23/05/2019 à 17:08, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > > Hi guys,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XBean 4.14

be great. > > Le jeu. 23 mai 2019 à 20:21, Francois Papon > <mailto:francois.pa...@openobject.fr>> a écrit : > > Hi, > > I can't see the issue attach to the release in the JIRA > version link and the release note is empty : &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.8

+1 (non-binding) Thanks! regards, François Papon fpa...@apache.org Le 29/04/2019 à 11:41, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi guys, > > here is the vote for Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.8. This is mainly for a few > fixes/enhancement and to enable CXF to upgrade: > > Major Improvement

Re: arthur release?

Hi! It would be nice :) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 04/12/2019 à 16:41, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi all, > > should we release arthur? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau |  Blog >  | Old Blog >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.0

+1 (non-binding) Thanks! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 05/12/2019 à 09:48, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote for our Geronimo Arthur project. > As a reminder it is a light preprocessor for GraalVM which enables to > build native binaries from java

Re: [DISCUSS] graal tooling?

Hi Romain! I think it's a great idea, it make sense to have tooling around graalvm. I will be more than happy to contribute ;) "arthur" looks good to me :) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 25/10/2019 à 09:00, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > Wonder if we want to create a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XBean 4.15

+1 (non-binding) Thanks! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 23/10/2019 à 09:24, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > As mentionned on the list some weeks ago we upgraded our xbean asm > shade to 7.2. > Here is the vote to let it be consumed and it is the only change to > the

Re: [DISCUSS] graal tooling?

com/rmannibucau> | >>  Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | >> Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> >> | Github >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo JCache Simple 1.0.3

+1 (non-binding) Thanks! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 14/02/2020 à 09:22, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > As mentionned on the list, here is our jcache implementation release vote. > Main change is to enable to deploy it in OSGi adding the required > metadata. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo JCache Simple 1.0.4

+1 (non-binding) Thanks! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 17/02/2020 à 10:35, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > As mentionned on the list, here is the vote for > our jcache implementation fixing OSGi-CDI metadata. > > Here is the staging > repo:  >

Re: Javax/jakarta

Hi, I think it would be a nice feature! Thanks! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 29/12/2019 à 11:48, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi all > > Do we want to host a binary+mvn plugin remapping javax on jakarta > package (with exclusions for future api pby)? > > This would enable to

MetricRegistry impl

Hi, I pushed a PR to override the default methods of the MetricRegistry implementation. The default methods will be removed from the specs in the next release. https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/5 Here the jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6769 Thoughts?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Metrics 3.0-M2

+1 (non-binding) Thanks! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 13/04/2020 à 17:22, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi all, > > Here is the vote for our Microprofile Metrics implementation. > It brings our compliance to v3.0-M2 spec and also provides jars > without jaxrs part of the impl. > >

Re: potential enhancement for our microprofile fault tolerance impl

Hi Romain, I can try to take a look and push a PR :) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 22/04/2020 à 15:48, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > I'm not a big user of Microprofile fault tolerance (without entering > into the details cause it is not the goal but I'm putting the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo XBean 4.17

+1 (non-binding) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 27/04/2020 à 16:47, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for xbean 4.17 which provides asm8 shade. > > Here is the > tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.17/ (rev > 1877082) > Here is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Specs JCDI_2.0 1.2, Annotation_1.3 1.3, AtInject_1.0 1.2, Interceptor_1.2 1.2, JSONP_1.1 1.4, JSONB_1.0 1.3

+1 (non-binding) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 28/04/2020 à 07:59, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for some of our spec with jakarta shades. > > Tags: > -  > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec-1.2/ >  (rev 

Re: [PROPOSAL] - website

| Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le sam. 9 mai 2020 à 09:57, Francois Papon > mailto:francois.pa...@openobj

Re: [PROPOSAL] - website

tps://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-

Re: [PROPOSAL] - website

om/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le sam. 9 mai 2020 à 15:22, Francois Papon > mailto:francois.pa...@openobject.fr>> a > écrit : > > Ah yes, got it. > > It's an online provider for my personal server so I don't have the > r

[PROPOSAL] - website

Hi, I would like to make a proposal about the Geronimo website (https://geronimo.apache.org). I think the actual website can be simplified because as the Geronimo application server is no longer under maintenance, the main goal of the Geronimo project is to provider multiple sub-projects like:

Re: [PROPOSAL] - website

> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le sam. 9 mai 2020 à 06:13, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit : > > It sounds good ! > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] - website

Hi, I added a section with a disclaimer, let me know ;) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 09/05/2020 à 09:14, Francois Papon a écrit : > > Hi, > > Thanks for the feedbacks! > > Agree with David's proposal, I will add a section about that. > > regards, > > Fra

Re: potential enhancement for our microprofile fault tolerance impl

Hi, I pushed a PR for this thread: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-safeguard/pull/4 TCK passed. regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 22/04/2020 à 16:14, Francois Papon a écrit : > Hi Romain, > > I can try to take a look and push a PR :) > > regards, > François > f

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Health v2.0.0 and Geronimo Metrics 1.0.5

+1 (non-binding) Thanks! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 15/09/2020 à 14:31, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to release our microprofile Health implementation in v2.0.0 > and Metrics implementation in v1.0.5. > > Main change is to support the new health spec

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-openapi-1.0.13

+1 (non-binding) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 16/10/2020 à 15:20, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > > Hi! > > Here is the staging repo > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1132/ >

Re: [VOTE] geronimo jsonp, jsonb, security, validation releases

+1 (non-binding) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 15/10/2020 à 22:38, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi! > > I want to call a VOTE on releasing  > > > geronimo-json_1.1_spec-1.5 > geronimo-jsonb_1.0_spec-1.4 > geronimo-security_1.0_spec-1.1 > geronimo-validation_2.0_spec-1.1 > > The only

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec api version 1.3

+1 (non-binding) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 15/10/2020 à 19:40, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi! > > I want to call a VOTE on releasing  > geronimo-jcdi_2.0 1.3 > > The staging repo is: > _https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1130/ >

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jcdi_1.0 and 1.1 spec jars

+1 (non-binding) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 15/10/2020 à 19:37, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi! > > I want to call a VOTE on releasing  > geronimo-jcdi_1.0-1.1 and > geronimo-jcdi_1.1-1.1 > > The staging repo is: >

Re: Fork some of our MP impls

ni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://ww

Re: Fork some of our MP impls

; Btw i dont care much of the name while it can last but Id like some > other opinion if possible (even negative) - otherwise it can be done > at github ;). > > Le mar. 22 sept. 2020 à 19:34, Francois Papon > mailto:francois.pa...@openobject.fr>> a > écrit : > > May b

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo XBean 4.18

+1 (non-binding) Thanks! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 21/09/2020 à 08:21, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for xbean 4.18 which provides asm9 shade. > > Here is the > tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.18/ >

Re: [PROPOSAL] - website

ucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le dim. 10 mai 2020 à 09:06, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>&

Re: [Arthur] support github as download url

Hi, Thanks for the fix! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 17/07/2020 à 17:22, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > You may not know but until now our default download url for graalvm in > arthur was the sdkman broker. > Sadly this one does not keep all versions so our master

Re: Fork some of our MP impls

Hi Romain, I think the config spec is interesting and could be add to the list. regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 31/07/2020 à 08:34, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > After some years of MP I think it is not a safe enough technology for > long term applications - i.e.

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-openapi-1.0.14

+1 (non-binding) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 30/11/2020 à 11:53, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.14. > Here is the changelog: > > 1–4 of 4View in Issue Navigator >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Simple JCache 1.0.5

+1 (non-binding) thanks! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 10/11/2020 à 15:36, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for our JCache implementation. > The only issue it fixes is: > > Major TaskGERONIMO-6789 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo JWT Auth 1.0.4

+1 (non-binding) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 11/11/2020 à 21:53, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > Here is the vote for our JWT Auth implementation v 1.0.4. > > The issues are: > > MajorBugGERONIMO-6757 > Changes to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo BatchEE 0.6

Nice! +1 (non-binding) Thanks Romain! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 12/11/2020 à 12:39, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi all, > > Here is the vote for batchee 0.6. > Here is the changelog:  > > 1–14 of 14View in Issue Navigator >

Re: [openapi][discuss changing a default in mojo] default for output in our openapi.json mojo

It make sense to have it in META-INF/resources regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 21/10/2020 à 11:38, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Default is target/classes/META-INF/classes/openapi.json > > think the last classes should have been resources, do we want to > change it - as a breaking

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.1

+1 (non-binding) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 08/01/2021 à 12:40, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi all, > > I'd like to release Arthur 1.0.1. > > Here is the changelog: > > T Patch Info Key Summary AssigneeReporter > P Status Resolution >

Re: Pending patches

ates from INFRA on this? Couldnt find the ticket id anymore, > sry. > > Gruss > Richard > > Am Mittwoch, den 19.05.2021, 09:38 +0200 schrieb Francois Papon: >> Hi, >> >> Yes, we plan to do this just after the migration to git ;) >> >> regards, >> >>

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

t; strub > > >> Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon >> mailto:francois.pa...@openobject.fr>>: >> >> Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward! >> >> regards, >> >> François >> fpa...@apache.org >

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit : > > +1 to have one repo per spec > > regards, > > François > fpa...@apache.org > Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Buc

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

+1 to have one repo per spec regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Guess we should stick to what we are used to. > The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we > do one repo per atomic release. > For specs it likely

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

ation-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le mer. 12 mai 2021 à 09:49, Francois Papon > mailto:francois.pa...@openobject.fr>> a > écrit : > > You mean having a vote per spec repository? > > regards, > > François > fpa...@apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache xBean-4.20

+1 (binding) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 07/05/2021 à 10:22, Mark Struberg a écrit : > hiho! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing xbean-4.20. > > The only change is to switch back to a dependency-reduced pom. > 4.18 und 4.19 did leak the shaded ASM dependencies down to consumers.

Re: Pending patches

Hi, Yes, we plan to do this just after the migration to git ;) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 19/05/2021 à 09:09, Zowalla, Richard a écrit : > Hi, > > thanks for your response! I think, that [1] might also affect the hard- > coded TLS1.0 in GERONIMO-6792 [2], so the pending patch would

Re: BATCHEE release?

+1 François fpa...@apache.org Le 28/04/2021 à 08:54, Mark Struberg a écrit : > while coming along, I'd also update BATCHEE to fit EE8 and update to > 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. > Any objections? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > On Wednesday, 28 April 2021, 08:44:08 CEST, Francois Pa

Re: BATCHEE release?

Hi Mark, Sounds good to me :) Thanks! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 28/04/2021 à 07:13, Mark Struberg a écrit : > hi folks! > > I'd like to do a BATCHEE release soon. > Anything you want to work on then ping me. > > txs and LieGrue, > strub >

Re: Release arthur 1.0.2 soon?

Hi, Thanks for the fix, I can test it ;) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 08/02/2021 à 17:12, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > Anyone able to test GERONIMO-6803 before we release arthur 1.0.2? > I'd love to release it with this fix but a second pair of eyes would > be

Re: Release arthur 1.0.2 soon?

Hi, I can confirm that the fix is ok. I removed the knight extensions from the local repo before to be sure :) +1 to release regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 08/02/2021 à 17:18, Francois Papon a écrit : > > Hi, > > Thanks for the fix, I can test it ;) > > regards,

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Arthur 1.0.2

+1 (non-binding) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 11/02/2021 à 12:16, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi all, > > I'd like to release Arthur 1.0.2 as mentionned on the list. > It is only about ensuring our maven plugin resolves knights properly: > > GERONIMO-6803

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Arthur 1.0.3

+1 (binding) François fpa...@apache.org francois.pa...@openobject.fr Le 30/08/2021 à 17:37, Francois Papon a écrit : > |Hi,| > | > | > |This is a call to vote in favor of releasing Apache Geronimo Arthur > version ||1.0.3.| >   > |We solved 9 issues:||| >   > |htt

ARTHUR Release

Hi, We solved some issues and I would like to do an ARTHUR release. Is this ok for all or someone want to include another issues or work? regards, -- François fpa...@apache.org

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.3

The Apache Geronimo team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.3. Apache Geronimo Arthur is an effort to build a thin layer on top of Oracle GraalVM to build native binaries from your Java programs. This is a feature release for 1.x.This release includes 9 issues

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Geronimo Arthur 1.0.3

Hi, This vote passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Romain Manni-Bucau, François Papon I'm promoting the artifacts on Central and dist.apache.org, update the website and Jira, I will then announce the release. Thanks all for your vote! -- François

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.1

Hi, I'm not sure to understand, we moved the source repository from svn to gitbox for javamail so for me it's a -1. Can you do the release from gitbox? regards, François fpa...@apache.org francois.pa...@openobject.fr Le 07/10/2021 à 21:30, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > Hi! > > I’d like to

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.1

Here the new ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22400 regards, François fpa...@apache.org francois.pa...@openobject.fr Le 11/10/2021 à 17:41, Francois Papon a écrit : > > Hi, > > According to the ticket, Infra noticed that the repo was made in RO at

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.1

cau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le lun. 11 oct. 2021 à 17:29, Francois Papon > mail

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.1

Louis MONTEIRO <mailto:jeano...@gmail.com>> a écrit : > > I'm confused François. > The ticket seems to reference Geronimo javamail provider and mail. > > This VOTE is for Geronimo Javamail specs. > > Did specs all move to gitbox? > > If so I'm sorry, I misse

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1 (reroll)

+1 (binding) Thanks! regards, François fpa...@apache.org francois.pa...@openobject.fr Le 15/10/2021 à 15:47, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > Hi! > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) > 1.0.1 > Importante note: we previously voted for the spec part. This vote

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1

+1 (binding) Thanks Jean-Louis! regards, François fpa...@apache.org francois.pa...@openobject.fr Le 12/10/2021 à 22:51, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > Hi! > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) > 1.0.1 > Importante note: we previously voted for the spec part.

Re: Fwd: OpenJPA 3.2.0 with Java 16

+1 regards, François fpa...@apache.org francois.pa...@openobject.fr Le 30/09/2021 à 20:04, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hiho! > > Sorry for x-posting, but this is really something we need to fix in > geronimo-specs. > Gonna roll the changes and perform a release if there is no objection. > >

[VOTE] Release Geronimo Arthur 1.0.3

|Hi,| | | |This is a call to vote in favor of releasing Apache Geronimo Arthur version ||1.0.3.|   |We solved 9 issues:|||   |https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220=12349696| |** Improvement     * [GERONIMO-6807] - support of annotated mode for openwebbeans

Re: Batchee coming release 1.0.1

+1! regards, François On 26/10/2021 10:07, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi all, I pushed a few changes on BatchEE, highlights are: 1. drop of cxf 2 client support (think it is way overdue) 2. adding basic spring-boot batchee UI integration I'd like to release it, any objection? Romain

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo BatchEE 1.0.1

+1 (binding) regards, François On 28/10/2021 14:11, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi all, Here is the vote for BatchEE 1.0.1 Changelog: MajorTaskBATCHEE-152 Provide a batchee UI spring-batch/spring-boot bridge

Re: Pending patches

mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit : > > Thanks for the update and taking action ! > > Regards > JB > > On 7/21/21 10:58 AM, Francois Papon wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This 3 repo has moved successfuly to gitbox: > > &g

Re: Pending patches

Zowalla a écrit : > Thx for the ticket id ! > > Am Dienstag, den 08.06.2021, 14:07 +0200 schrieb Francois Papon: >> Hi, >> >> Migration is still pending, waiting for infra: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21908 >> <https://issues.a

Re: Pending patches

pply them directly? > > Gruss > Richard > > > Am Mittwoch, den 21.07.2021, 10:58 +0200 schrieb Francois Papon: >> Hi all, >> >> This 3 repo has moved successfuly to gitbox: >> >> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean >> https://github.com/ap

Re: Pending patches

Thanks! François fpa...@apache.org Le 21/07/2021 à 11:59, Zowalla, Richard a écrit : > Ok. Will do! > > Am Mittwoch, den 21.07.2021, 11:58 +0200 schrieb Francois Papon: >> Hi, >> >> I think it's better if you can push a PR via github. >> >> regards, >&

Re: Pending patches

Hi, I merged some PRs to update the scm section and infra confirmed that the svn repos has been passed to read only mode when they started the migration process. regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 21/07/2021 à 11:04, Francois Papon a écrit : > > Good point! > > I will up

Re: Pending patches

woch, den 21.07.2021, 09:59 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: >> Ok. Will do! >> >> Am Mittwoch, den 21.07.2021, 11:58 +0200 schrieb Francois Papon: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think it's better if you can push a PR via github. >>> >>> regards, >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.5

+1 (binding) Thanks! regards, François On 14/02/2022 18:03, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi all, As discussed on the list, here is the vote for Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.5 which enables to use OpenWebBeans interceptors without any hack. Dist:

Re: [VOTE Apache TransactionManager 3.1.5 and Geronimo Config 1.2.3, Health 2.0.1, OpenAPI 1.0.15, OpenTracing 1.0.3, Metrics 1.0.6

+1 (binding) Thanks! regards, François On 25/02/2022 12:10, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: Hi! Just adding VOTE to the message object so it's clear. JLouis Le jeu. 24 févr. 2022 à 20:22, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : Hi everyone, I'd like to release our Apache TransactionManager

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Arthur 1.0.4

Hi guys, Kindly reminder that need more binding vote :) Thanks! regards, François On 26/01/2022 15:46, Francois Papon wrote: +1 (binding) Thanks! regards, François On 26/01/2022 11:50, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi all, we fixed and enhance Geronimo Arthur and here is the vote to let

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Arthur 1.0.4

+1 (binding) Thanks! regards, François On 26/01/2022 11:50, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi all, we fixed and enhance Geronimo Arthur and here is the vote to let it go public: Major Improvement GERONIMO-6819 Add openwebbeans jakarta

Re: Arthur 1.0.4-SNAPSHOT

+1! regards, François On 25/01/2022 20:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi all, Just to let you know I did the needed changes to enable to use arthur with GraalVM 22.0.0.2 (java 11 or 17 flavors). Even our OpenWebBeans Knight can be used for the jakarta flavor now. Not sure there is any need

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.21 release

+1 (binding) Thanks! regards, François On 13/04/2022 15:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi everyone, I submit Apache XBean 4.21 release to your vote. This release includes: - Spring 4 & 5 support, up to Spring 5.3.19 - ASM 9.3 update Release Notes:

Re: Milestone / Alpha Release of geronimo-txmanager?

+1 for a final :) On 19/10/2023 19:44, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: so let's do a final would be my 2 cts ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog  | Old Blog | Github

Re: Milestone / Alpha Release of geronimo-txmanager?

if there is a bug Le jeu. 19 oct. 2023, 21:08, Francois Papon a écrit : +1 for a final :) On 19/10/2023 19:44, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: so let's do a final would be my 2 cts ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.7

+1 (binding) On 18/08/2023 16:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi all, Here is the vote for Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.7. Main change is the support of new URL for graalvm download. Repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1161/ Tag:

Re: Proposal: Retiring the Geronimo Project

+1 for retiring the main project and finding hosts for sub projects. regards, François On 11/07/2022 18:52, Raymond Augé wrote: The "Geronimo" project is getting long in the tooth and has very few maintainers. It's been teetering on the edge of what could be considered active ever since I've

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.22 release

+1 (binding) On 10/10/2022 11:23, fpapon wrote: Hi everyone, I submit Apache XBean 4.22 release to your vote. This release includes: - ASM 9.4 update Release Notes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310312=12352368

Re: Next XBEAN release

Ok, Thanks for the reply, I will start the release process for the 4.22 and close the old jira versions. regards, Francois On 07/10/2022 13:25, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: PS: 3.19 and 3.20 never got released so think it is ok to keep them hanging even if it is unlikely we would release

[Arthur] Next release

Hi all, I would like to prepare the next 1.0.6 version of Arthur. Any objections or wishes to be included? Regards, François

Re: [batchee] future?

Hi, I don't have insights about how BatchEE is used today and how the jbatch specification is support by others. +1 for freeze. regards, François On 18/11/2022 08:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi all, We discussed some time ago to drop batchee as an active subproject, wonder where we

Re: [batchee] future?

ell alive. Also investing time on and on. Is there anything which is required to do? LieGrue, strub Am 18.11.2022 um 09:50 schrieb Francois Papon : Hi, I

Re: [batchee] future?

? LieGrue, strub Am 18.11.2022 um 09:50 schrieb Francois Papon : Hi, I don't have insights about how BatchEE is used today and how the jbatch specification is support by others. +1 for freeze. regards, François On 18/11/2022 08:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi all, We discussed some time

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo BatchEE-1.0.3

+1 (binding) regards, François On 18/04/2023 12:26, Mark Struberg via dev wrote: Hi! I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing BatchEE-1.0.3. This is mostly an update to the latest TomEE version and a fix in the ChildFirstURLClassLoader * [BATCHEE-162

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Arthur 1.0.6

+1 (binding) regards, François On 17/04/2023 20:54, fpapon wrote: |Hi,| | | |This is a call to vote in favor of releasing Apache Geronimo Arthur version ||1.0.6.| |We solved 7 issues:||| |https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220=12351343| |** Bug     *

Re: Status BatchEE-2.0.0

+1 to remove them also On 25/04/2023 09:52, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: Yes. Let's use the major release to remove the components not ready. As Romain says it's easy to add them back if needed Le mar. 25 avr. 2023, 09:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : Agree, I also think we can drop all

Re: Release of BatchEE ?

Hi, I never did release for BatchEE before but if it can help I can try to run the process. regards, François On 19/03/2024 09:34, Richard Zowalla wrote: Hey all, since the PR got merged, can anyone trigger a release for BatchEE 2.0.0 ? The TCK challenge is open and might take some more

Re: Release of BatchEE ?

> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 19 mars 2024 à 10:42, Francois Papon a écrit :

Re: Release of BatchEE ?

For TomEE it's just for tests purpose? On 19/03/2024 15:46, Richard Zowalla wrote: TomEE 10 requires BatchEE 2.0.0 :-) Don't know if we really need the Deltaspike integration (for now) Am 19. März 2024 15:42:11 MEZ schrieb Francois Papon : There is some SNAPSHOT dependencies used

  1   2   >