or
GBeanLifeCycleController ?
(same for GBeanLifecycle and GBeanLifeCycle) ?
English is not my native language so I was just guessing if there
could be some naming issue here.
I think a LifeCycle is a cardiovascular fitness machine. :)
geir
Eric
--
Geir Magnusson Jr
Milestone me, baby.
+1
On Jun 24, 2004, at 1:40 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Hot deployment thing was the big thing I was waiting for in the next
milestone - is there anything else imminent or should we put out
another milestone release?
+1 from me for a milestone.
--
Geir Magnusson Jr
On Jul 13, 2004, at 11:47 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Tuesday, July 13, 2004, at 06:36 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Jul 11, 2004, at 12:40 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi David,
If I remember correctly, setting a maxsize on the PooledExecutor can
cause deadlocks IF your not careful with the work
On Jul 13, 2004, at 5:39 PM, toby cabot wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:33:35PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Is it really now as in if you don't have to wait for a thread, do
it
- otherwise return w/ a status indicating now wasn't possible or now
as in wait until there's a thread, do
On Jul 13, 2004, at 5:39 PM, toby cabot wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:33:35PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Is it really now as in if you don't have to wait for a thread, do
it
- otherwise return w/ a status indicating now wasn't possible or now
as in wait until there's a thread, do
. Thank you.
--
Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
310.536.8355, ext. 26
--
Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in there to make
it easer for committers to bootstrap into helping, but right now it's
just odds and ends needed for the testing work, like geronimo specific
configuration.
Access to these resources is for committers that have signed NDAs. If
you wish access, please let me know.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson
(or XmlBeans parses it into a typeless thing
that looks like a DOM). I prefer to simply pass the location through
to the module builder so it can handle it like it does for a
standalone module with an external plan (6 one way, half a dozen the
other)
-dain
--
Geir Magnusson Jr
what's going on?
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on!
geir
karan
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
lines...
+1
geir
-dain
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jars from sun privately on our local machines. It's a minor pain for
those of us that care, and doesn't affect the rest of the world.
geir
--
Jeremy
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
done
In the future, please use the standard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
geir
On Oct 10, 2004, at 6:36 AM, Vaughn Bullard wrote:
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of the
work that Gianny has done, and that he has recently been given commit
on OpenEJB and TranQL. So thanks, Gianny, for a job well done!
-dain
--
Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect
Gluecode Software
310.536.8355, ext. 26
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL
WITH IT!
--
Jeremy
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
plans. As usual, any comments
would be welcome.
http://chariotsolutions.com/geronimo/
Thanks,
Aaron
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
What's in it?
On Nov 3, 2004, at 8:48 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On the belief we need to formally vote on making a release, should we
produce a M3 release?
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, if there were any
trunk changes to that
Thanks,
Aaron
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 4, 2004, at 4:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Nov 4, 2004, at 3:51 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Nov 4, 2004, at 3:45 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
It is covered in the subversion book http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
Can understand why you would want to branch for security, but I
think you
On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:39 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 7, 2004, at 1:21 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
Per these disagreements, I think that we should address them before
we move on simply because I don't want to be bitten by these same
issues again. I suggest that we learn
that people are
trying to have their cake and eat it too by riding on
the ASF name without adhering to its standard practices.
This is an issue that every ASF project has had to deal with
in one way or another.
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
appreciate any feed
back quickly, as we are going to (try to) cut M3 tomorrow afternoon.
What are the repercussions for existing users?
-dain
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
know if you have problems - do a test checkin on somethign
harmles (like maven.xml)...
cheers
Srinath
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:03:33 -0800, Geir Magnusson Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On behalf of the Apache Geronimo PMC, I'm pleased to announce that
Srinath Perera has been granted committer status
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1728802,00.asp
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
need to update if it hasn't
changed since 2004
geir
Jacek
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
://mail.yahoo.com
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
--
Jeremy
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.com.com/Open-source+software+gets+J2EE+nod/2110-7344_3
-5557582.html?part=rsstag=5557582subj=news.7344.5
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jonas.objectweb.org/
Lets catch them...
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
support of the spec,
asymmetry and all.
2) A Geronimo-specific tool that lets me have the nifty things you
guys
designed into this, like a redistributable configuration archive.
I'll
go re-read the threads...
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, it would be great if you could make a list of the
features that you're looking for (e.g. the requirements) so we can talk
about what is or should be implemented.
I'll do that. First one that comes to mind is what triggered this,
namely undistribute. :)
geir
Aaron
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr
On Feb 7, 2005, at 1:04 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Feb 7, 2005, at 7:34 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
It seems I can deploy to a running server and distribute to a
non-running server. I understand the technical difference, but I
don't grok why we need this difference, and more importantly, why
and build it to
have the jars locally until the publishing happens. I don't like doing
this to people - what should I do? I'd prefer a solution that didn't
require me to back out my dependency additions, but will if that's the
only way.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr
Mail client senior moment...
Begin forwarded message:
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: February 8, 2005 7:14:16 AM EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: we now have a dep on Apache Scout
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because of recent JAXR work, we now have a dependency on Apache Scout
if failure to the dev list, and keeps trying
until success, in which case also an email to dev list then you
could look at the dev list to see where we are...
(This isn't an original idea...)
geir
thanks
david jencks
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL
On Feb 9, 2005, at 3:02 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Feb 9, 2005, at 11:59 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Feb 9, 2005, at 1:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I'd like to volunteer some Gluecode resources
(non-Geronimo-committer!) to setup a simple CI-like system - it just
moronically does a clean
break seamless integration with JMX,
and could require redesign of OpenEJB, ActiveMQ gbeans, and gbeans in
geronimo itself.
If you want, I'll implement the class and make the changes.
-dain
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 23, 2005, at 10:14 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Feb 23, 2005, at 9:24 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Feb 23, 2005, at 12:23 AM, David Jencks wrote:
+1 on canonical name as internal string representation
-1 on attempting to preserve whatever string is used to construct
the gbean name
I've
() {
+return map.entrySet();
+}
+
+public boolean equals(Object o) {
+return map.equals(o);
+}
+
+public int hashCode() {
+return map.hashCode();
+}
+}
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
build (unless xmlbeans is providing snapshots)
3. Move when the next beta including XMLBEANS-116 is released.
Comments?
I'd prefer 1, 2, and 3 in that order.
thanks
david jencks
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think by definition he kicks you out of the rookie club, and you
graduate to old hand
:)
geir
On Mar 25, 2005, at 11:18 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Congrats! Now you can join me in the rookie club!
Jeff
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Congratulations Mark.
--
Jeremy
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Dear Mark
close), so is now a good
time to do a milestone? I'm willing to help with the mechanics to keep
Dain and David (and others) cranking on certification work...
Comments?
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
forward w/ a
release? We're going to have to bang out a real release process for
1.0, and this is a good opportunity to get started. I volunteer to
help.
geir
I am sure there are more
--
Jeremy
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
(From a tangential discussion on pmc@, this came up and Alan noted
this would
, 2005, at 9:10 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
(From a tangential discussion on pmc@, this came up and Alan noted
this would be better discussed here, so I'm just moving it here)
It's been 5 months since the M3 milestone release, and a *tremendous*
work has gone into the project since then.
We
On Mar 29, 2005, at 11:33 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Mar 29, 2005, at 10:40 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
-1
We'll ignore this as it isn't a vote :)
Whilst I agree with the intention, we do not have a process defined
that would allow us to generate a reproducable release
On Mar 29, 2005, at 12:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Heh. I was just thinking about that, and also about the subject of
OpenEJB - would there be good benefit into bringing it to Geronimo?
We seem to be so interdependent...
Well, hopefully that will change. I would
for a month
or on the website for a while.
-David
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and painful at times.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
style
manifest, so we can remove all the funky arguments to the deploy
command that creates a manifest. This new tool could considerably
speed up the assembly process.
What do you think?
-dain
--
Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect
Gluecode Software
310.536.8355, ext. 26
--
Geir Magnusson Jr
On Mar 30, 2005, at 5:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Mar 30, 2005, at 3:37 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Mar 30, 2005, at 5:57 AM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
All - For now, we could make a first step by just putting the
geronimo build artifacts on geronimo.apache.org/maven - namely
on the oversight process
I think that covers the basics. Comments?
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
capabilities.
More comments inline, all fine tuning.
--
Jeremy
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Here's a proposal for the Geronimo PMC regarding running a maven
repository for the project here at the ASF. The basic problem is
that there are many at the ASF, including board members, that believe
w/o having to have HEAD of G locally and built...
That's the only reason I can think of (and it applies to any project
that wants to tie closely to us...)
geir
-dain
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(try downloading from http://mx4j.sourceforge.net)
Thanks!
-Hari
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mar 31, 2005, at 6:30 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
On Mar 31, 2005, at 6:17 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Mar 31, 2005, at 6:14 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
I think we should keep as much history as possible, at least the
dependencies for all maintained branches.
I would say, we never remove a jar
On Mar 31, 2005, at 8:15 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
On Mar 31, 2005, at 7:35 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Mar 31, 2005, at 6:30 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
On Mar 31, 2005, at 6:17 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Mar 31, 2005, at 6:14 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
I think we should keep as much history
be an artifact from ActiveMQ. The word 'SNAPSHOT' would help.
I also would have thought that the ActiveMQ project wouldn't want
activeMQ-*.jar floating around out there where they didn't choose *...
We'll figure it out...
geir
Regards,
Hiram
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1
On Mar 31, 2005, at 11:17 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
No, but I worry about just bundling random whatever from outside the
project with our releases. It would help to use the svn revision on
the jar, but we should really make it clear that it's something the
geronimo
by Geronimo, and we're a
long way from that as that hasn't been the focus or a requirement for
our near-term goal of certification.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
be usable via normal JDBC configuration.
--
Jeremy
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 1, 2005, at 12:01 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Hiram Chirino wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005, at 4:53 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Mar 31, 2005, at 11:17 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
No, but I worry about just bundling random whatever from outside
the project with our
-specific descriptor files?
Thanks a lot
-Vincent
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/licenses/cla-corporate.txt
This is optional, but encouraged. This document shows
that your employer knows and accepts that you are
contributing to the project. There are lots of good
reasons to get this done if you can.
Congratulations!
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr
to this change. It is critical that we let people know when
this kind of change is made.
--
Jeremy
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and 0.9 stuff are becoming good enough for some dependable use, and
thus we should only depend on released software.
My USD0.02
geir
-dain
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 4, 2005, at 4:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:10:55PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 2:20 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 9:59 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Seems like we are going in circles on this one. Can we reasonable
agree
On Apr 4, 2005, at 5:48 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:10:55PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 2:20 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 9:59 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Seems like we are going in circles on this one. Can we reasonable
agree
On Apr 4, 2005, at 7:12 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 3:53 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 5:48 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Even further, I don't think pressuring projects into giving us an
officially named version of our SNAPSHOT when they aren't ready to
release
On Apr 5, 2005, at 8:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks everyone!
I would like to accept and I am waiting for approval from corporate
legal.
BTW, if you need any help explaining or discussing, let us know. We've
been through this before with other companies.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr
that could be cleaned up?
--
Jeremy
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a manager, if that manager
many not be around later...
geir
Enquiring minds want to know!
Jeff
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Apr 5, 2005, at 8:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks everyone!
I would like to accept and I am waiting for approval from corporate
legal.
BTW, if you need any help
, there's no doubt that's not easy to do ..
witness Xerces. I know the IBM folks realize the challenges and I have
no doubt Geir and crew will avoid the pitfalls.
Sanjiva.
(an IBMer until a few weeks ago)
:)
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
that, or
if you can just post to the JIRA.
Great!
geir
Katia
Descubre la descarga digital segura. Medio millón de canciones en
MSN Music.
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
standalone.
This will also speed the unstable build as we won't need to check
SNAPSHOTs for everything all the time.
I would suggest we start on this as part of packaging for M4 and
would be willing to co-ordinate.
--
Jeremy
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203
BTW, however we resolve stable and unstable, I really do like the
idea of a separate sandbox tree. That will make things very clear to
people.
geir
On May 27, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Clearly, we need something like this to get organized around the
final push
On May 27, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Clearly, we need something like this to get organized around the
final push for certification and the 1.0 release, by why not just
branch for the stable, and head is unstable?
The names are just suggestions
On May 27, 2005, at 12:48 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On May 27, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Clearly, we need something like this to get organized around the
final push for certification and the 1.0 release, by why not
just branch
.
This will also speed the unstable build as we won't need to check
SNAPSHOTs for everything all the time.
I would suggest we start on this as part of packaging for M4 and
would be willing to co-ordinate.
--
Jeremy
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL
...) but
I can now identify one feature of CVS that I miss...
geir
Regards,
Alan
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of libations
(j/k)!
It would be great to meet everyone.
Should we plan a place and meeting time?
Jeff
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, 29 May 2005, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 5/28/2005 5:32 PM:
On May 28, 2005, at 1:43 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Its getting close to the big event...
Should we be thinking about a small Geronimo get-together for some
beers?
How about a big Geronimo get together
.
Aaorn
On Sun, 29 May 2005, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 5/28/2005 5:32 PM:
On May 28, 2005, at 1:43 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Its getting close to the big event...
Should we be thinking about a small Geronimo get-together for
some beers?
How about a big
, at 11:25 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Actually, SVN's repo for geronimo could have been set up in a
modular approach instead of a monolithic trunk, and act similarly
to CVS.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 5/28/2005 7:10 AM:
On May 27, 2005, at 7:46 PM, Alan D
/gARAmOpAKCVANxfB36tX36emF6nLvKy+a/IkACghrzo
nG3rKqN5K3CNVFIEWPDSKjg=
=BFcE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
not impact each other in
any way.
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 30, 2005, at 4:18 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 5/30/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm too dim to figure out how, because no matter what, since there is
no notion of a tag or branch, no matter how you slice and dice,
either you branch to a different root when you cut
On May 30, 2005, at 4:49 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On May 30, 2005, at 11:13 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On May 29, 2005, at 6:46 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
-1 on Saturday.
+1 on Sunday. I get in Sunday.
The only issue on Sunday is that we have J2EE Licensee Day that
afternoon
On May 30, 2005, at 3:28 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On May 28, 2005, at 1:41 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I think I wrote something a little confusing...let me clarify...
What we do to a subset of Geronimo has impact on the whether it
passes. However if Geronimo
On May 30, 2005, at 6:59 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 5/30/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 30, 2005, at 4:18 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 5/30/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm too dim to figure out how, because no matter what, since
On May 30, 2005, at 8:10 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Well, it does if you want to avoid getting the entire history of the
project when you do a co. That's really the issue.
That's really a layout issue. You put the trunk, branches, and
tags
this one first. The other follows after that, IMO.
geir
Regards,
Alan
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can we agree that we need to somehow construct the stable, unstable
and sandbox codebases?
If so, can we move on to how?
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of
interesting assemblies that people might want to do that aren't
J2EE. For example, a simple Geronimmo server (no API stakc), a
simple servlet/jsp stack, etc...
geir
Aaron
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Can we agree that we need to somehow construct the stable, unstable
collectively? I think we
want to provide better visibility for those that want to contribute...
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 695 matches
Mail list logo
