12, 2007, at 9:09 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
bubbleboy:/usr/lib/jvmjava -version
java version 1.5.0_08
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_08-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_08-b03, mixed mode)
The file /usr/lib/libgcj.so.5.0.0 exists. I have discovered
Dims,
Has this been fixed now ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 12 Feb 2007 22:14:44 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 506686 built with tests skipped
See the full build-1700.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070212/build-1700.log
Downloading:
Removed geronimo-corba-deployer from the list of modules in the
configs/pom.xml.
Anybody has a problem, HOLLER !
At Revision 506852
Cheers
Prasad
On 13 Feb 2007 04:00:58 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 506847 built with tests skipped
See the full build-2300.log
Is this what David Jencks is talking about in the following thread ?
http://www.nabble.com/New-openejb-deployer-has-very-different-assumptions-than-the-rest-of-the-deployment-system---not-compatible-with-offline-deployment-tf3207032.html
Cheers
Prasad
On 10 Feb 2007 22:19:24 -, [EMAIL
- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 9 Feb 2007 12:59:16 -
Subject: Build failure for Revision: 505235
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
[INFO]task-segment:
McGuire wrote:
Prasad,
Any chance I can convince you to add an easy to filter on tag to
the beginning of the subject line for these notices? Typically,
build successful is not an interesting event, and can be shuffled
into a different folder.
Rick
Prasad Kashyap wrote
event, and can be shuffled into a
different folder.
Seems like there are other folks who follow a successful build and
thereby get the latest binaries from it.
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=8870930framed=y
Rick
Cheers
Prasad
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
-- Forwarded message
, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Of late I have begun seeing a number of java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
during deployment of some test apps in the testsuites.
Here are a couple of them
o.a.g.testsuite/jms-ear/2.0-SNAPSHOT/ear
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/jms-ear-2.0-SNAPSHOT.ear
http
On 2/9/07, Ted Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am also getting a build failure:
Compiling 89 source files to C:\g\modules\geronimo-connector\target\classes
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
On 2/9/07, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are these really necessary? Can we send these to SCM? They are getting
really annoying...
I don't know Jeff. This came about b'coz some folks expressed a need
to see constant build notifications. It helps to catch and notify
build breaks
:
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
On 2/9/07, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are these really necessary? Can we send these to SCM? They are getting
really annoying...
I don't know Jeff. This came about b'coz some folks expressed a need
to see constant build notifications. It helps to catch
Done ! These notifications will now go to scm list from now on.
Cheers
Prasad.
On 2/9/07, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
No, I don't think you have an unreasonable request.
I'm perfectly ok with sending this to the scm list. I chose the
devlist because
Of late, there's been a lot more samples contributions. To make this
task easier, I have a geronimo-samples-archetype which will create the
samples template for you. You will just have to drop your java code in
there without having to worry too much about maven build structure.
Wow ! Thanx Paul.
David Blevins had once told me that if the deployer does not find
geronimo-openejb.xml, it does not know it has to handle the app to
OpenEJB deployer. The recent changes during OpenEJB integration
enables a DD and plan free deployment. However, this I suspect, causes
a nasty
)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.SimpleConfigurationManager.startConfiguration(SimpleConfigurationManager.java:527)
2007/2/8, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2/8/07, Sean Qiu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why the test pass rate is not 100%?
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html
On 2/9/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: prasad
Date: Fri Feb 9 13:52:23 2007
New Revision: 505518
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=505518
Log:
* removed persistence-context-type. transaction is implied
.
Cheers
Prasad
Lin
-Original Message-
From: Prasad Kashyap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 11:50 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Build successful for Revision: 504936
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 8
using the binaries. ;-)
Cool. I shall work on making those binaries available for you.
Cheers!
Hernan
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
On 2/8/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks! I think it would be really good to have a blessed build every
day!:-)
I have set it up to run builds 4 times
I thought they were currently stopped for some reason (AntHill
problems ?). It's been a while since we saw any posts from the GBuild
to the devlist.
After the recent spate of build failures, thought I'd run this some 4
times a day so that
1) it will catch a build failure and notify the community
problems were fixed.
I have been sending emails manually about failures I run into. Might
have time next week to clean up the email template and then I will
enable them to be sent to the list again.
--jason
On Feb 8, 2007, at 5:49 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I thought they were currently stopped
The deployment-testsuite/test-deployments deploys the following 2 ears
in succession, hits the context-root URL in a browser and then
undeploys it again.
org.apache.geronimo.testsupport/test-ear-j2ee_1.3/2.0-SNAPSHOT/ear
org.apache.geronimo.testsupport/test-ear-j2ee_1.4/2.0-SNAPSHOT/ear
This
Dain was referring to this -
http://www.nabble.com/Persistence-deployer-bugs--tf3189760.html
Will wait on David Jencks to fix this soon :-)
Cheers
Prasad
On 2/8/07, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 8, 2007, at 6:17 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote
Of late I have begun seeing a number of java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
during deployment of some test apps in the testsuites.
Here are a couple of them
o.a.g.testsuite/jms-ear/2.0-SNAPSHOT/ear
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/jms-ear-2.0-SNAPSHOT.ear
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 9 Feb 2007 03:51:17 -
Subject: Build successful for Revision: 505152
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070208/build.log
Download the
The testsuite on 1.2 is neither maintained nor supported. If you want
to try it, please use the trunk.
But if you want to stay on 1.2, build the geronimo/maven-plugins
directory first. It will build the testsuite-maven-plugin for you. You
may also have to build the geronimo/testsupport
On 2/7/07, Sean Qiu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/2/7, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The testsuite on 1.2 is neither maintained nor supported. If you want
to try it, please use the trunk.
do you mean use the testsuite in trunk or the src of geronimo in trunk?
I meant the testsuite
]
---
[INFO] Running console-testsuite.basic-console
2007/2/8, Sean Qiu [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks :)
I want to run all the testsuite with harmony classlib and vm instead of
sun-jre.
To compare these results.
2007/2/8, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2/7/07, Sean Qiu [EMAIL PROTECTED
Is this on trunk ? We don't have any itests in the regular build of
trunk. So that config option (with or without) shouldn't be doing
anything to you.
Cheers
Prasad
On 2/6/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there, for the past few times, I didn't have any luck in building
Geronimo using
Revision 503718Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Revision: 503718
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: dims
Last Changed Rev: 503689
Last Changed Date: 2007-02-05 09:06:26 -0500 (Mon, 05 Feb 2007)
Properties Last Updated: 2007-01-03 09:25:29 -0500 (Wed,
Problem solved.
Apparently deleting just o.a.g.* from the local repo wasn't enough. I
had to delete org/apache/axis2 too.
Cheers
Prasad
On 2/5/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision 503718Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Revision: 503718
Node Kind
+1
On 2/2/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Vamsi
On 2/1/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3 as
requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.
I hereby propose we release this branch
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/31/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3 as
requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.
I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
Release Branch:
://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=8652849framed=y
--jason
Cheers
Prasad
On Jan 31, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
The samples-parent was added to have a separate tree for the
individual samples and differentiate them from the
geronimo-samples-archetype child project
The project did not inherit from genesis' project-config because I
could not prevent it from inheriting all the reports. I tried using
excludeDefaults for the maven-project-info-plugin and that didn't
work too.
Now I have it extending from project-config but I have to exclude all
other unwanted
the reason that WARs contained in EARs are not listed in the
Web App WARs portlet is because the start, stop, restart, and
uninstall controls would not work as expected.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 1/28/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the samples application EAR is deployed, it shows up only
On 1/27/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 27, 2007, at 1:01 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I have made the binaries from Geronimo 2.0-M2 available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M2-rc1
In this directory you will find the various assemblies for your
I think we talked about this offline. OK. You may remove this if you want.
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/27/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This just enables one module... testsuite, same as...
cd testsuite; mvn
To enable mutiupule modules I can see the need for a profile, but for
a
No I haven't verified the @EJB injection on Jetty. I believe it is
only on trunk. I was working on getting my M2 build to work. (unable
to resolve dependency o.a.g.specs.geronimo-ejb_3.0_specs//jar)
When I finally gave on M2 build and work on trunk, I hit the
following problem -
Missing:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1939:
-
Affects Version/s: 2.0
2.0-M2
1.1.1
I reviewed the binaries that Matt has put for review on the following
vote thread -
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--2.0-M2-Milestone-ready-for-review-and-JACC-Specs-tf3126768.html
The @EJB injection does not work for Jetty. However, the undeploy of
EJBs now work fine.
These fixes were first put
/attachments/35312/calculator-stateless-ear-2.0-SNAPSHOT.ear?version=1
The wiki page is here -
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/Using+some+of+EJB+3.0+functionalities
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/27/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I reviewed the binaries that Matt has put for review
OK. Now I have verified the @EJB injection jack for Jetty on TRUNK and
have found it to be working.
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/27/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No I haven't verified the @EJB injection on Jetty. I believe it is
only on trunk. I was working on getting my M2 build to work
This is how I see it. The apps in geronimo/server/trunk/applications
should be the ones that are absolutely required by the server. Eg:
console, welcome app etc.
The optional apps like servlet-examples, jsp-examples should be moved
elsewhere to a samples directory or project. There is no need to
Two issues here -
1) Dain's fixes are in trunk. They have not been merged with the M2
changes yet. So at the moment, the M2 has these limitations.
2) This is a bigger issue. I don't see the Release Notes in the
unpacked server !!!
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/26/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/26/07, Dave Colasurdo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks... Have included the MDB restriction in the latest attachment.
BTW, The version in the 2.0-M2 branch is quite stale.
Can someone please refresh the copy at:
I have been experiencing problems with plexus artifacts downloaded
from the codehaus repo. More specifically, the problems are regarding
the plexus-compiler artifact and it's parent. The poms there have been
corrupted.
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/26/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 26,
I merged the M2 branch with the latest changes from Dain, Blevins and Jencks.
I think the merge went pretty well considering I was doing it for the
first time. However, the M2 build fails in the assemblies with the
error shown below.
I spent quite some time trying to resolve this but in vain
but I
probably won't work on it tonight if there are problems.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 25, 2007, at 12:14 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I merged the M2 branch with the latest changes from Dain, Blevins and
Jencks.
I think the merge went pretty well considering I was doing it for the
first time
, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I merged the M2 branch with the latest changes from Dain, Blevins
and Jencks.
I think the merge went pretty well considering I was doing it for the
first time. However, the M2 build fails in the assemblies with the
error shown below.
I spent quite some time trying
and used mvn install to build.
Paul
On 1/25/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 25, 2007, at 2:44 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I'm afraid I can't claim the same result. Even after very many
attempts, it fails at the very same spot. So I checked out revision
499677 (one before
Blevins just deployed the OpenEJB3 jars. So you may want to give it
another shot.
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/24/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm also failing with a very similar error at rev 499420.
Paul
On 1/24/07, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hitting this build failure this
'svn up' openejb3
'svn up' geronimo trunk
mvn clean install openejb3 and trunk
Encountered the following error while starting the server. With all
the recent deploys going on, this may or may not be problem. Will
re-confirm after the other machine builds from scratch again.
11:26:09,947 INFO
Sorry for the false alarm !
The binary built from a clean repo is good !
We have a good server running on trunk.
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/24/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'svn up' openejb3
'svn up' geronimo trunk
mvn clean install openejb3 and trunk
Encountered the following error
You mean geronimo-openejb free deploy.
The latest revisions do support ejb-jar.xml free deployments
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/24/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but not yet a ejb-jar.xml application.xml free deploy
On Jan 23, 2007, at 9:54 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
We can now have
Congrats Chris ! Welcome aboard !
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/24/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In recognition of Chris' contributions to DayTrader (new UI, new
runtime modes) and his sustained set of patches and nagging he has
accepted our offer to join our merry little band of pirates.
the NPE position has now changed, I believe I have the latest
code in the server.
Cheers
Prasad
-David
On Jan 22, 2007, at 4:46 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 21, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I was able to deploy the app successfully but only after using an
openejb-jar.xml
: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 2.0-M2, 2.0
Reporter: Prasad Kashyap
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 2.0-beta2, 2.0
3.0 EJBs can now implement POJO interfaces. So when you reference them
The easiest way to reference a 3.0 EJB is by dependency injection
(@EJB). But we don't have annotations working in servlets yet. So if
we go back to doing the traditional way of a lookup, we would have to
declare a ejb-ref in the web.xml
Even if the annotations are processed, they write an
For those interested and following this thread (D Jencks had a similar
NPE), both these issues are now resolved.
We can now have a ejb-jar.xml free deployment and openejb-jar.xml free
deployment.
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/23/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/22/07, David Blevins
I worked on the EJB 3.0 samples over the weekend and finally got the
samples deployed. In the process, I also dug out some bugs in the
builder (http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=8479403framed=y).
I might open a JIRA and fix it.
Here are the things that I found not quite working so
Stateless Container/
/openejb-jar
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/19/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/webservices-testsuite/jaxb-tests/jaxb-ejb/
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/19/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
It's a test case
Hi Jacek,
It's an archetype file, a template; when the testsuite-archetype
plugin used to create a testsuite. Eclipse shouldn't be trying to
compile it.
Anyways, I have removed it now.
Completed: At revision: 498317
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/20/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Created a -Puser profile.
Revision 498337
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/20/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright.. I can put that in a profile. But a user should be able to
have a way to build and install it all in one go. If that's a profile
invocation, then so be it.
Cheers
Prasad
Have you tried cleaning your entire local repo ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/21/07, Heinz Drews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get following failure:
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
Sure, no problem. Anything to keep you happy :-)
My one good deed for the day is done !
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/21/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/21/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jacek,
It's an archetype file, a template; when the testsuite-archetype
plugin
/openejb/deployment/EjbModuleBuilder.java?view=log
Should this be fixed ? Or is the openejb-jar.xml mandatory ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/20/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have created a sample application out of the
calculator-stateless-pojo example in OpenEJB 3.0
It is checked in here
On Jan 19, 2007, at 7:54 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
On 1/19/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are there reporting elements in the architype (and also in the
first sample), which are not at the top-level, but are in calculator-
stateless-pojo?
The requirement is for only 2 reporting
]
/snip
--jason
On Jan 19, 2007, at 7:54 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
On 1/19/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are there reporting elements in the architype (and also in the
first sample), which are not at the top-level
I have created a sample application out of the
calculator-stateless-pojo example in OpenEJB 3.0
It is checked in here -
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/samples/trunk/calculator-stateless-pojo/
The app tries to demonstrate dependency injection of the bean into a
servlet and obviates the
to
start Geronimo or deploy anything, which it appears that it currently
does.
The default build, should compile/package/install and should not be
attempting to start or deploy anything.
--jason
On Jan 20, 2007, at 6:21 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
On 1/19/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED
I didn't use any toolbox.
On 1/20/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: prasad
Date: Sat Jan 20 09:13:51 2007
New Revision: 498144
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=498144
Log:
* dummy/minimum plans for ejb
Oops.. hit the send inadvertently.
Anyways, Blevins told me that ejb-jar/ should be good enough. But
since that didn't work. I tried a bit more. I copied that line from
the plan in the geronimo-openejb-builder module
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/20/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't
Wow !!! You guyz are terrific !
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/19/07, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has been a long week, but David and I got the integration working
tonight. We successful got the OpenEJB 3 itest application to deploy
and got the client to fire up and call the server. A
Encouraged by your kind words of appreciation for the Testsuite
framework, I put together a similar Samples Framework.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/samples/
UseCase Scenario 1
---
Actor: Geronimo user, JEE5 Developer.
Requirements:
* Actor wants to learn
Hernan,
Can you please post the stacktrace of the mvn -e command ? Maybe
something in the trace can help us decipher what's actually going on.
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/19/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have been consistently having this build failure all day while building
, at 9:22 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Encouraged by your kind words of appreciation for the Testsuite
framework, I put together a similar Samples Framework.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/samples/
UseCase Scenario 1
---
Actor: Geronimo user, JEE5 Developer
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/webservices-testsuite/jaxb-tests/jaxb-ejb/
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/19/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
It's a test case in Geronimo source code. See
testsuite/webservices-testsuite/jaxb-tests/jaxb-ejb directory.
Jarek
On
Versions: 2.0
Reporter: Prasad Kashyap
Assigned To: Davanum Srinivas
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 2.0
At revision 497491.
Compiling 71 source files to
/home/prasad/geronimo/trunk/modules/geronimo-axis2/target/classes
[INFO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12465807
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-2751:
--
+ Error stacktraces are turned on.
[INFO] Scanning
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap closed GERONIMO-2751.
Resolution: Fixed
The build works from a squeaky clean repo.
Earlier, I had just
I'm OK with shipping the same configurations for M2 but we really
should have a serious discussion on our packaging strategy.
I think we will be opening ourselves to a lot of grief if we took upon
the responsibility of TCK'ing every permutation and combination that
there is. We can claim support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap closed GERONIMO-2755.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Thanx for the tests, Paul.
Completed
Srinivas,
Your console config failed to start. It doesn't seem to be related to
the webservices-testsuite.
I suspect you may be encountering the long-path problem on windows.
By default, the geronimo-maven-plugin will unpack the Geronimo server
into the target directory of the project invoking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463915
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-2716:
--
Anita, on second thoughts, I wonder if we should have left
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200701.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/11/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 10, 2007, at 8:55 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Here i go again on a wild goose chase :( Anyone have a clue?
- Fresh svn checkout of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463606
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-2716:
--
Cool. Let me take a look and get back. Thanx Anita.
Create
David (Jencks),
The cxfPojoWS/server test in the testsuite has only 1 test and that
too is commented out. This is currently under testsuite/itests.
The other tests that Jarek contributed have now been renamed as more
generic jaxws-tests and moved to the webservices-testsuite.
What should
Affects Versions: 2.0-M2, 2.0
Reporter: Prasad Kashyap
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 2.0-M2, 2.0
Geronimo Testsuite failed all testcases since it could not deploy any of the
configurations. Please see the exception below. A similar exception is seen
when
I wonder if this is the cause of the deployment failures I am seeing
in the Testsuite
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2721
Cheers
Prasad
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jan 5, 2007 6:56 PM
Subject: svn commit: r493249 - in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap closed GERONIMO-2721.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed !
Unable to deploy anything
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463654
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-2716:
--
Anita, believe this is a partial patch. I was unable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463676
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-2716:
--
The mods in 1.3 and 1.4 apps look good. I had to specify
??? I'm confused... is it currently fixed and if so by
what? I'd guess it was fixed by my commits last night in rev 494692
(trunk) and 494701 (1.2). IIRC I ran some Testsuite bits which
passed for me before committing.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:58 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I wonder
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap reassigned GERONIMO-2664:
Assignee: Joe Bohn
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=7869532framed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2664:
-
Affects Version/s: 2.0
Fix Version/s: 2.0
2.0-M2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2664:
-
Affects Version/s: 2.0-M2
Servlet Filter Error
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap reassigned GERONIMO-2651:
Assignee: Paul McMahan
Servlet annotations are not supported
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2651:
-
Affects Version/s: 2.0
Fix Version/s: 2.0
2.0-M2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2650:
-
Affects Version/s: 2.0
2.0-M2
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Comments inline
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/5/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the pictures, but haven't had time to look at the implementations.
Ditto
I think some of the dependency viewer info is already available somewhere
else where we show the parents and children of each
401 - 500 of 1196 matches
Mail list logo
